DOCSLIB.ORG

Kosciuszko Bridge Project Pin X729.77.123

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kosciuszko Bridge Project Pin X729.77.123 DRAFT NEPA SCOPING MEMORANDUM: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT KOSCIUSZKO BRIDGE PROJECT PIN X729.77.123 Project Limits Brooklyn-Queens Expressway (BQE)/Interstate 278 Between Morgan Avenue and the Long Island Expressway (LIE) Interchange Kings and Queens Counties April 2002 New York State U.S. Department of Transportation Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Kosciuszko Bridge Project Draft NEPA Scoping Memorandum I. Introduction The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), in cooperation with the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT), will prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that will study and document possible improvements to the Kosciuszko Bridge, focusing on a 1.1-mile segment of the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway (BQE) portion of I-278, from Morgan Avenue in Kings County to the Long Island Expressway (LIE) interchange in Queens County. In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), a public "scoping" process will be conducted to identify the social, economic, and environmental issues to be evaluated in a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). This process ensures that the DEIS is a concise, accurate and comprehensive document that covers all concerns and issues for public and agency review. This Draft Scoping Memorandum is one of the first steps in the preparation of the DEIS for the Kosciuszko Bridge Project. It presents: (1) background information on the project, (2) the types of alternatives to be considered and the methods to be used to select alternatives for consideration in the DEIS, and (3) the projected procedures and methodologies to be followed in the preparation of the DEIS. Information on the project’s extensive public outreach program is also provided. This memorandum also outlines the Kosciuszko Bridge Project's goals and objectives, the alternatives selection process and expected environmental issues, each of which is discussed in later sections of this memorandum. II. Overview of the Kosciuszko Bridge Project Project Location The Kosciuszko Bridge Project will study possible solutions for the rehabilitation or replacement of the Kosciuszko Bridge, focusing on a 1.1-mile segment of the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway (BQE), from Morgan Avenue in Kings County to the Long Island Expressway (LIE) interchange in Queens County (see Figure 1). North of the bridge, the BQE connects to the LIE, the Grand Central Parkway (GCP), which extends to LaGuardia International Airport, and across the Triborough Bridge leading into Manhattan and the Bronx. To the south, the BQE connects to the Williamsburg, Manhattan and Brooklyn bridges, as well as the Brooklyn-Battery Tunnel, leading into Manhattan, and continues south as the Gowanus Expressway and across the Verrazano-Narrows Bridge, leading to Staten Island. As one of New York City’s few north-south interstates, I-278 serves commuter and local traffic as well as a significant amount of truck traffic, which is prohibited from neighboring parkways. Need for Improvements The Kosciuszko Bridge Project will address three primary problems identified with this segment of the BQE: 1 Kosciuszko Bridge Project Draft NEPA Scoping Memorandum • Traffic Congestion. The bridge, built in the 1930’s, cannot safely carry the present volume of traffic. The bridge’s narrow lanes (11 feet), steep grades (4 percent), lack of shoulders, and short merge/weave distances near ramps and interchanges do not meet current highway design standards. These design shortcomings, combined with the approximately 170,000 vehicles using the bridge each day, result in stop-and-go conditions during the morning and evening peak periods and severe congestion throughout much of the midday. The delay that results on the bridge encourages many drivers to seek alternate routes around the highway congestion by diverting onto already crowded arterials and neighborhood streets in adjacent communities. As the expected growth in highway volumes continues, these problems will increase as well. • Traffic Safety. The same design problems that affect traffic flow, as noted above, also T r i B - B r id o r LaGuardia g o e Airport N Gra Li nd C nc A entra T ol l Pk un n wy ne T l T A H L Expwy N ong pwy Ex d an A Isl Holland Tun M s nel n ee u Q QUEENS V a Kosciuszko n W n Bridge y y l c k k o E o r x B p w y Pkwy y w p x E s u Kennedy n a w Airport o G lt e BROOKLYN B Be l t no S aza P IE err kwy V idge Br FIGURE 1. KOSCIUSZKO BRIDGE LOCATION affect traffic safety conditions on the bridge and adjacent highway segments. Those problems collectively result in an accident rate more than four times higher than found on comparable roads elsewhere in New York State. 2 Kosciuszko Bridge Project Draft NEPA Scoping Memorandum • Structural Conditions. The structural condition of the bridge is deteriorating. The 60- year old bridge underwent a major rehabilitation in the 1960s, followed by a series of major roadway and structural repairs starting in the late 1980s. However, recent inspections have indicated that despite these aggressive maintenance efforts by NYSDOT, the structural deficiencies are increasing. The frequent maintenance and repair efforts and their associated lane closures, while necessary to maintain the bridge, exacerbate the congestion and traffic diversion problems mentioned above and do not provide a long-term solution to the structure’s underlying problems. Project Goals and Objectives During the EIS process, alternatives will be developed to address the traffic capacity, safety, and structural needs noted above. NYSDOT, working with local elected officials, community boards and groups, and other agencies, is establishing a series of goals and objectives that any proposed alternatives should seek to achieve. Any alternative being considered will then be evaluated against these goals and objectives, balancing the needs of the project with a broad range of social, economic, and environmental concerns. Prior to the start of the public scoping process, NYSDOT held several open houses in Brooklyn and Queens and meetings with community boards, along with discussions with other agencies and elected officials. From these efforts, NYSDOT gained an initial understanding of what issues were of most concern to community members, business groups, planning agencies and other stakeholders. Using this information, the following goals and objectives have been developed for the project: Transportation Goals: • Improve traffic operations in the corridor, reducing delays and increasing efficiency and reliability. • Reduce the frequency and severity of traffic accidents in the corridor by eliminating non-standard elements on the bridge and associated highway sections and ramps. • Minimize diversion of highway auto and truck traffic to local streets, both during construction and long-term. • Substantially conform to established project design criteria to ensure safe operation and a smooth flow of traffic. • Be consistent with regional transportation plans in the I-278 corridor and any related highway, transit or freight plans potentially affected by decisions in the project corridor. • Provide a cost-effective solution to problems in the corridor, including both required capital construction costs and recurring operations and maintenance expenses. • Improve the opportunities for pedestrian/bicycle travel in the corridor. • Increase effectiveness of mass transit modes in the corridor. 3 Kosciuszko Bridge Project Draft NEPA Scoping Memorandum Social, Economic & Environmental Goals: • Minimize the displacement of residences, commercial establishments, parks and other valued community assets during construction and in the final build condition. • Minimize adverse impacts on the operation of commercial, residential and industrial properties, historic sites, and educational, religious or recreational facilities, during construction and in the final build condition. • Minimize adverse environmental impacts in the surrounding communities during construction and in the final build condition. • Be consistent with existing and committed transportation, community development, and land use plans and projects. This list will be refined and expanded during the scoping process based on additional input from agencies, elected officials, and the general public. As part of the alternatives analysis process, screening criteria, reflecting these goals and objectives, will be developed and used to evaluate the project alternatives and select those to receive detailed consideration in the EIS. This alternatives analysis process is discussed further in Section IV. III. Environmental Review and Scoping Process Based on its review of the potential impacts of the proposed Kosciuszko Bridge Project, FHWA and NYSDOT concluded that it was appropriate to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the project. Therefore, FHWA published a “Notice of Intent” (NOI) to prepare an EIS in the Federal Register, consistent with NEPA regulations, while under parallel SEQRA guidelines, NYSDOT published a similar “Positive Declaration” in the Environmental Notice Bulletin. The Draft and Final EIS documents, to be completed in compliance with NEPA and SEQRA regulations, will be used by the FHWA, NYSDOT and other involved agencies to consider environmental concerns when making decisions. These documents will also serve as a public disclosure of the project's environmental effects. Scoping Process The scoping process is the earliest opportunity
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New York City Comprehensive Waterfront Plan
    NEW YORK CITY CoMPREHENSWE WATERFRONT PLAN Reclaiming the City's Edge For Public Discussion Summer 1992 DAVID N. DINKINS, Mayor City of New lVrk RICHARD L. SCHAFFER, Director Department of City Planning NYC DCP 92-27 NEW YORK CITY COMPREHENSIVE WATERFRONT PLAN CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMA RY 1 INTRODUCTION: SETTING THE COURSE 1 2 PLANNING FRA MEWORK 5 HISTORICAL CONTEXT 5 LEGAL CONTEXT 7 REGULATORY CONTEXT 10 3 THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 17 WATERFRONT RESOURCES AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE 17 Wetlands 18 Significant Coastal Habitats 21 Beaches and Coastal Erosion Areas 22 Water Quality 26 THE PLAN FOR THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 33 Citywide Strategy 33 Special Natural Waterfront Areas 35 4 THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 51 THE EXISTING PUBLIC WATERFRONT 52 THE ACCESSIBLE WATERFRONT: ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES 63 THE PLAN FOR THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 70 Regulatory Strategy 70 Public Access Opportunities 71 5 THE WORKING WATERFRONT 83 HISTORY 83 THE WORKING WATERFRONT TODAY 85 WORKING WATERFRONT ISSUES 101 THE PLAN FOR THE WORKING WATERFRONT 106 Designation Significant Maritime and Industrial Areas 107 JFK and LaGuardia Airport Areas 114 Citywide Strategy fo r the Wo rking Waterfront 115 6 THE REDEVELOPING WATER FRONT 119 THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT TODAY 119 THE IMPORTANCE OF REDEVELOPMENT 122 WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT ISSUES 125 REDEVELOPMENT CRITERIA 127 THE PLAN FOR THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT 128 7 WATER FRONT ZONING PROPOSAL 145 WATERFRONT AREA 146 ZONING LOTS 147 CALCULATING FLOOR AREA ON WATERFRONTAGE loTS 148 DEFINITION OF WATER DEPENDENT & WATERFRONT ENHANCING USES
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E: History and Projection of Traffic, Toll Revenues And
    APPENDIX E HISTORY AND PROJECTION OF TRAFFIC, TOLL REVENUES AND EXPENSES and Review of Physical Conditions of the Facilities of Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority April 26, 2013 Prepared for the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority A Constituent Agency of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority By TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................................. E-1 Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority (TBTA) .......................................................... E-1 Metropolitan Area Arterial Network ............................................................................... E-3 Other Regional Toll Facilities .......................................................................................... E-4 Regional Public Transportation ....................................................................................... E-5 TOLL COLLECTION ON THE TBTA FACILITIES ................................................................ E-5 Present and Proposed Toll Structures and Operation ...................................................... E-5 E-ZPass Electronic Toll Collection System ..................................................................... E-8 TBTA‘s Role in E-ZPass ............................................................................................... E-10 Passenger Car Toll Rate Trends and Inflation ............................................................... E-11 HISTORICAL TRAFFIC, REVENUES AND EXPENSES AND ESTIMATED/BUDGETED NUMBERS
    [Show full text]
  • $223,355,000 Triborough Bridge and TUNNEL Authority Lehman
    NEW ISSUE BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY $223,355,000 TRIBOROUGH BRIDGE AND TUNNEL AutHORITY (MTA Bridges and Tunnels) General Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A DATED: Date of Delivery DUE: November 15, as shown on the inside cover The Series 2007A Bonds are being issued to finance bridge and tunnel projects. The Series 2007A Bonds – • are general obligations of MTA Bridges and Tunnels, payable generally from the net revenues collected on the bridges and tunnels operated by MTA Bridges and Tunnels as described herein, and • are not a debt of the State or The City of New York or any other local government unit. MTA Bridges and Tunnels has no taxing power. In the opinion of Hawkins Delafield & Wood LLP, Bond Counsel to MTA Bridges and Tunnels, under existing law and relying on certain representations by MTA Bridges and Tunnels and assuming the compliance by MTA Bridges and Tunnels with certain covenants, interest on the Series 2007A Bonds is • excluded from a bondholder’s federal gross income under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, • not a preference item for a bondholder under the federal alternative minimum tax, and • included in the adjusted current earnings of a corporation under the federal corporate alternative minimum tax. Also in Bond Counsel’s opinion, under existing law, interest on the Series 2007A Bonds is exempt from personal income taxes of New York State or any political subdivisions of the State, including The City of New York. The Series 2007A Bonds are subject to redemption prior to maturity as described herein. The Series 2007A Bonds are offered when, as, and if issued, subject to certain conditions, and are expected to be delivered through the facilities of The Depository Trust Company, on or about June 20, 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Client Service and Attention Drive Carl Schipfmann's
    CLIENT SERVICE AND ATTENTION DRIVE CARL SCHIPFMANN’S LEADERSHIP Schipfmann takes responsibility for HNTB’s reputation when delivering bridge projects to clients. Whether you are his client, supervisor, coworker or friend, Carl Schipfmann is going to present you with his genuine self. With a reputation as a dynamic leader, Schipfmann dedicates himself to his projects by embedding himself into their intricate, day-to-day details. Schipfmann is a veteran bridge project manager in the Kansas City office whose expertise includes bridge design, inspection and construction administration. He currently serves on the Kansas City design team that is working on the cable-stayed unit of the Kosciuszko Bridge Replacement, a New York City design-build project replacing the bridge spanning New Town Creek between Brooklyn and Queens. He has served HNTB on many bridge-related design projects over the past 22 years, and has provided shop drawing review and answered requests for information to provide clarification on numerous projects, all within schedule constraints. “Carl loves to get in and get his hands dirty with the design,” said Marc Whitmore, project CARL schipFMANN PROJECT MANAGER manager in the Kansas City office. “He thrives on the challenge of figuring out how to KANSAS CITY OFFICE design and build different components of his projects and really shines when handling technical issues.” DETAIL-ORIENTED LEADERSHIP Schipfmann’s bridge teams seem to respond well to his leadership style, which is as much relationship-oriented as anything else. Rather than listening to him bark out orders, his teams become closely knit while learning from the example of his attention to detail and dedication to client service.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes
    2016 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes TM NEW YORK CITY Bill de Blasio Polly Trottenberg Mayor Commissioner A member of the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council 2016 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes Contract C033467 2014-2015: PTDT14D00.E01 2015-2016: PTDT15D00.E01 2016-2017: PTDT16D00.E02 2017-2018: PTDT17D00.E02 The preparation of this report has been financed through the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Transit Administration and Federal Highway Administration. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council in the interest of information exchange. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Federal Transit Administration, Federal Highway Administration or the State of New York. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. NYCDOT is grateful to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Bridges and Tunnels (MTABT), the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ), and the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council (NYMTC) for providing data used to develop this report. This 2016 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes Report was funded through the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council SFY 2017 Unified Planning Work Program project, Data Management PTDT17D00.E02, which was funded through matching grants from the Federal Transit Administration and from the Federal Highway Administration. Title VI Statement The New York Metropolitan Transportation Council is committed to compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, and all related rules and statutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Governor Andrew M. Cuomo Thursday, August 1, 2019
    Governor Andrew M. Cuomo Thursday, August 1, 2019 9:28 AM Wheels up Albany en route Oswego County Airport Aircraft: NYSP Helicopter Passengers: Governor Andrew M. Cuomo Kelly Cummings, Director of State Operations & Infrastructure John Maggiore, Senior Advisor to the Governor Protective Services incl. Capt. V. Straface State Purposes: The Governor flew from Albany to Oswego to participate in a Lake Ontario tourism event with the Attorney General. Mixed Use: No Reimbursed: No 10:28 AM Wheels down Oswego County Airport 11:15 AM Lake Ontario Fishing Trip with Attorney General Letitia James Location: Port of Oswego 1 East 2nd Street Oswego, NY 13126 1:45 PM Press Conference with Attorney General Letitia James regarding Lake Ontario Tourism Location: Port of Oswego 1 East 2nd Street Oswego, NY 13126 3:08 PM Wheels up Oswego County Airport en route Albany Aircraft: NYSP Helicopter Passengers: Governor Andrew M. Cuomo Kelly Cummings, Director of State Operations & Infrastructure John Maggiore, Senior Advisor to the Governor Protective Services incl. Capt. V. Straface State Purposes: The Governor flew from Oswego to Albany to end his day. Mixed Use: No Reimbursed: No 4:08 PM Wheels down Albany **** OTHER EXECUTIVE USE OF STATE AIRCRAFT 10:16 AM Wheels up LaGuardia International Airport en route Oswego County Airport Aircraft: NYSP King Air Passengers: Dani Lever, Director of Communications NYS Attorney General Letitia James Ibrahim Khan, Chief of Staff to the Attorney General Delaney Kempner, Sr. Communications Advisor to the Attorney General Hector Fuentes, LE Advisor to the Attorney General 1 State Purposes: Attorney General Letitia James flew from NYC to Oswego to participate in a Lake Ontario tourism event and press conference with the Governor.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E History and Projection of Traffic
    APPENDIX E HISTORY AND PROJECTION OF TRAFFIC, TOLL REVENUES AND EXPENSES and Review of Physical Conditions Of the Facilities of Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority April 29, 2008 Prepared for the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority By TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE .............................................................................E-1 Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority (TBTA)..........................................................E-1 Metropolitan Area Arterial Network ...............................................................................E-3 Other Regional Toll Facilities..........................................................................................E-4 Regional Public Transportation .......................................................................................E-4 TOLL COLLECTION ON THE TBTA FACILITIES................................................................E-5 Current Toll Structure and Operation ..............................................................................E-5 E-ZPass Electronic Toll Collection System ....................................................................E-7 TBTA’s Role in E-ZPass.................................................................................................E-9 Passenger Car Toll Rate Trends and Inflation .................................................................E-9 HISTORICAL TRAFFIC, REVENUES AND EXPENSES AND ESTIMATED/BUDGETED NUMBERS FOR 2008 ..............................................................................................................E-12
    [Show full text]
  • Kosciuszko Bridge Brooklyn, New York
    CASE STUDY Kosciuszko Bridge Brooklyn, New York HISTORY The Kosciuszko Bridge has a long and storied history. The first bridge on the site, built in 1803, connected Meeker Street in Brooklyn to Review Avenue and Laurel Hill Blvd. in Queens. Several replacement bridges have come and gone, with the most recent being a cable- stayed bridge that replaced the deteriorating truss bridge built in 1939. PROBLEM Traffic on and around the Kosciuszko Bridge in Brooklyn has been a problem for years. The 1939 bridge was built to serve up to 10,000 cars a day. However, when it became part of the Interstate Highway System in 1965, traffic flowing across the bridge was up to 18 times that number. In 2009, the New York State Department of Transportation decided to replace the aging structure with a new bridge. Two structures would be built. The first, a new 5-lane eastbound span constructed parallel to the old structure. In April 2017, the eastbound edges are then simultaneously heated with a structure opened with 2-way traffic, allowing high frequency current and squeezed together PROJECT PARTNERS the older bridge to be demolished and to produce a bond. The longitudinal ERW seam Owner construction to begin on the second structure, does not require filler metal while impurities in New York State Department of Transportation – Albany, NY a new westbound span. the heat affected zone are extruded during the welding process. General Contractor SOLUTION Granite Construction Company – The ERW pipe piles used for the pier footings Watsonville, CA Granite Construction Company was the were all produced by Nucor Skyline’s new contractor on the second bridge span, ERW mill.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes
    2015 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes TM NEW YORK CITY Bill de Blasio Polly Trottenberg Mayor Commissioner A member of the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council 2015 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes Contract C033467 2014-2015: PTDT14D00.E01 2015-2016: PTDT15D00.E01 The preparation of this report was financed in part with funds from the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, under the Federal Highway Act of 1956, as amended, and the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964, as amended. This document is disseminated by the New York City Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. It reflects the views of the New York City Department of Transportation (NYCDOT), which is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The report does not necessarily reflect any official views or policies of the Federal Transit Administration, the Federal Highway Administration, or the State of New York. The report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. NYCDOT is grateful to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Bridges and Tunnels (MTABT), the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ), and the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council (NYMTC) for providing data used to develop this report. Prepared by: New York City Department of Transportation Polly Trottenberg Commissioner Margaret Forgione Chief Operating Officer Joseph Jarrin, Executive Deputy Commissioner for Strategic and Agency Services Ryan Russo Deputy Commissioner Charles Ukegbu, Assistant Commissioner, Regional & Strategic Planning Naim Rasheed Senior Director, Traffic Engineering & Planning Alexander M. Keating Director of Special Projects Richard P. Roan Special Projects Danny Yoder Special Projects Published October 2016 2015 NEW YORK CITY BRIDGE TRAFFIC VOLUMES 2,661,105 5.8% Decrease (‐6,428 Daily vehicles per day used the 47 toll‐free Vehicles) bridges monitored by the New York City Department of Transportation in Williamsburg Bridge over the East 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Corridors Vehicle Speed Data - 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS County Corridor From Street To Street Page BRONX Appendix A Inerstate I‐278 Triborough Bridge I‐95 A‐15 Inerstate I‐87 Westchester County Line I‐278 A‐2 Inerstate I‐95 New York County Line Westchester County Line A‐14 Bronx River Pkwy Inerstate I‐278 Westchester County Line A‐13 TOC Boston Rd Bronx River Pkwy Ropes Ave A‐12 1 Boston Rd 3rd Ave E Tremont Ave A‐1 Bruckner Blvd Inerstate I‐87 Westchester Ave A‐16 Edward L Grant Hwy/Dr M. L. King Jerome Ave W Kingsbridge Rd A‐4 Fordham Rd New York County Line Boston Rd A‐10 Grand Concours e E 138th St Mosholu Pkwy S A‐6 Gun Hill Rd Gun Hill Pkwy Inerstate I‐95 A‐7 Jerome Ave/Central Park Ave E 204th St Westchester County Line A‐8 Jerome Ave/Macombs Dam Bridge W 169th St New York County Line A‐5 Tremont Ave Sedgwick Ave Williamsbridge Rd A‐11 Webster Ave/Melrose Ave 3rd Ave Westchester Ave A‐9 Westchester Ave 3rd Ave Inerstate I‐95 A‐3 KINGS Appendix B Inerstate I‐278 Verrazanno Bridge Kosciuszko Bridge B‐11 Atlantic Avenue 6th Ave Queens County Line B‐2 Belt Pkwy Inerstate I‐278 Queens County Line B‐5 Bushwick Ave Maspeth Ave Pennsylvania Ave B‐6 Conduit Blvd Atlantic Ave Queens County Line B‐7 State Hwy 27 Inerstate I‐278 Ocean Pkwy B‐20 Williamsburg Bridge Inerstate I‐278 Clinton St (Manhattan) B‐22 Fort Hamilton Pkwy Marine Ave State Hwy 27 B‐9 4th Ave Flatbush Ave Shore Rd B‐1 Avenue U Stillwell Ave Mill Ave B‐3 Bedford Ave Division Ave Emmons Ave B‐4 N E W Y O R K C I T Flatbush Ave/Marine Pkwy Bridge Manhattan Bridge Rockaway Point
    [Show full text]
  • Download the List
    NEW YORK–AREA WORLDWIDE ENGINEERS ENGINEERS 2019 FIRMWIDE COMPANY/ PHONE NUMBER/ 2019/ 2019/ REVENUE NEW YORK–AREA SERVICE MIX RANK ADDRESS WEBSITE SENIOR EXECUTIVE(S) 2018 2018 (IN MILLIONS) (PORTION OF BILLINGS) RECENT PROJECTS/CLIENTS WSP USA 212-465-5000 Lou Cornell 797 27,058 $6,954.4 Construction mgmt.: 15% Kosciuszko Bridge for the state 1 Penn Plaza wsp.com Chief executive 819 26,950 Engineering: 83% Department of Transportation; 1 New York, NY 10119 Facility assessment: 2% 55 Hudson Yards for Related Cos. Thornton Tomasetti Inc. 917-661-7800 Peter DiMaggio, 336 980 $285.0 Architecture: 12% LaGuardia Airport Terminal B; 51 Madison Ave. thorntontomasetti.com Michael Squarzini 324 980 Engineering: 48% Sunnyside Yard New York, NY 10010 Co-chief executives Facility assessment: 35% 2 Thomas Scarangello Other:5% Executive chairman Langan 212-479-5400 David Gockel 313 571 $307.0 Engineering: 100%4 Hudson Square; Bronx Point 21 Penn Plaza langan.com President, chief executive 287 525 3 New York, NY 10001 STV 212-777-4400 Dominick Servedio 225 586 $582.5 Architecture: 30% Highbridge Interchange 225 Park Ave. South stvinc.com Executive chairman 229 440 Construction inspection: 5% rehabilitation design-build for New York, NY 10003 Construction mgmt.: 20% Posillico Civil Inc. and the state Engineering: 45% Department of Transportation; South Beach Psychiatric Center 4 new residential building for Dormitory Authority of the State of New York GPI Greenman-Pedersen Inc. 646-791-8800 Denise Carter 212 395 $300.8 Construction inspection: 25% George Washington Bridge 21 W. 38th St. gpinet.com Executive vice president, 207 381 Construction mgmt.: 35% rehabilitation construction New York, NY 10018 metro-area branch manager Engineering: 35% management; Bayonne Bridge 5 Facility assessment: 5% navigational clearance program construction management AECOM 212-973-2900 Denise Berger 200 10,750 $20,200.0 Architecture: 12% n/d 605 Third Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Newtown Creek Guide
    total. There are 4 sections of Calvary (365 acres in total), the one on the Newtown Creek Superfund cleanup and coal tar (a product Newtown Creek closest Newtown Creek is known as First or Old Calvary. It is a Roman from MGP) can be seen bubbling up from the Creek’s floor nearby is a 3.8 mile waterway connected to the East River and serves as the border between Western Queens and North Brooklyn. By the early 20th century the Creek became Catholic Cemetery, managed by St. Patrick’s Cathedral. at low tide. one of the busiest waterways in the country, carrying more value and volume of cargo than the entire Mississippi River. Goods manufactured in the area included fer- 1 tilizers, chemicals, glues, ropes, dyes and many varieties of petroleum products. The lax environmental regulation and protections in place during the heyday of heavy industrial use (1860-1970) left a legacy of toxic contamination, still present within the sediments of the Creek. As a result, the Creek was declared a federal Superfund Greenpoint Oil Spill Maspeth Avenue Plank Road Bridge The largest underground oil spill in the history of the United States One of the oldest crossing of Newtown Creek this bridge connected N 2 bridge site in 2010; investigation and remediation is currently underway, overseen by the US EPA. Environmental conditions continue to improve on Newtown Creek with many 16 23 is located beneath a 55 acre area of Greenpoint. The plume, an esti- the early communities of Maspeth and Newtown, across what was north native species of fish and birds returning to the area.
    [Show full text]