DOCSLIB.ORG

Bqe Triple Cantilever

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BQE TRIPLE CANTILEVER Importance to Regional Truck Activity May 2019 nyc.gov/dot 1 As presented to the BQE Expert Panel for informational/background purposes only. https://bqe-i278.com/en/expert-panel/documents Background nyc.gov/dot 2 As presented to the BQE Expert Panel for informational/background purposes only. https://bqe-i278.com/en/expert-panel/documents INTER-BOROUGH & REGIONAL TRUCK TRIPS • Between 2011 and 2018: • Volumes of larger tractor-trailers on most regional bridges have 3 either declined or remained stable, while single-unit trucks increased during this time. 1 • Tolled passenger car traffic on the George Washington Bridge 5 increased 2.5% from 46.1 million to 47.3 million vehicles, and commercial traffic remained stable at 3.8 million vehicles per year. 7 • Tolled passenger car traffic on the Mario Cuomo Bridge (Tappan Zee) increased 9.7% from 22.6 million to 24.8 million vehicles, and commercial traffic increased 71.4% from 1.4 million to 2.4 million 2 vehicles per year. • The increased regional presence of the Mario Cuomo Bridge for 6 trucks has implications for truck travel on regional highways including the BQE. 4 • Trucks made up an average of 8.3% of all total inter-borough crossings • 17,844 average daily trucks on BQE triple cantilever, which has bi- directional truck volumes comparable to the region’s most important 8 bridges TOP TRUCK CROSSINGS INTO & OUT OF NYC: TOP INTER-BOROUGH TRUCK CROSSINGS: 1. 31,764: The George Washington Bridge (GWB) 5. 37,078: Alexander Hamilton Bridge 2. 16,966: The Long Island Expressway (LIE) 6. 19,657: Kosciuszko Bridge 3. 8,852: New England Thruway 7. 13,929: Throgs Neck Bridge 4. 8,514: Goethals Bridge 8. 12,368: Verrazano-Narrows Bridge nyc.gov/dot 3 As presented to the BQE Expert Panel for informational/background purposes only. https://bqe-i278.com/en/expert-panel/documents GROWTH ON VERRAZANO-NARROWS BRIDGE Truck Volumes • The Verrazano-Narrows Bridge (VNB) is one of the Annual Truck Volume & Percent Change on VNB (2015-2018) major feeder crossings for BQE truck traffic. Truck Type • 6% (12,652) of the 202,523 vehicles using the VNB daily are trucks. Between 2015 and 2018, overall traffic Total Trucks volume on the VNB increased by 12%; truck traffic increased by 21% over the same period. 2-axle 3-axle 4-axle 5-axle 6-axle All Axles . 58% (7,372) of the total daily truck traffic is inbound 2015 2,087,398 389,210 241,112 927,904 37,030 3,688,166 (eastbound), and 42% (5,280) of it is outbound (westbound), with even greater directional imbalances 2,185,946 473,208 266,786 908,806 34,926 3,877,960 2016 during peak hours and for larger trucks. +5% +22% +11% -2% -6% +5% . Eastbound (inbound) truck peak: 9 – 10 AM 2,350,138 513,522 277,798 961,368 29,338 4,136,822 2017 . Westbound (outbound) truck peak: 10 – 11 AM +8% +9% +4% +6% -16% +7% 2,467,832 587,946 332,444 1,015,512 34,356 4,444,342 • This imbalance is at least partly caused by existing 2018 commercial tolls, which can range from $34 for 2 axle +5% +14% +20% +6% +17% +7% trucks to $132 for 7 axle trucks, are only administered for westbound traffic entering Staten Island. nyc.gov/dot 4 As presented to the BQE Expert Panel for informational/background purposes only. https://bqe-i278.com/en/expert-panel/documents Origin-Destination Analysis Methodology nyc.gov/dot 5 As presented to the BQE Expert Panel for informational/background purposes only. https://bqe-i278.com/en/expert-panel/documents METHODOLOGY Analysis of INRIX Commercial GPS sources with Streetlight Insights • Origin-destination (OD) analysis was performed using commercial GPS sources from INRIX data and were analyzed through Streetlight Insights platform • This analysis includes commercial GPS data from trips starting an ending within 25 miles of NYC (the limits of NYCDOT’s subscription with Streetlight Insights); This analysis does not include trips starting or ending beyond the 25 miles limit • The AM peak period reflects the hours of 8am-9am, while the PM peak period corresponds to the hours of 2pm-3pm; these reflect the periods when commercial vehicle activity is greatest on the triple cantilever section of the BQE • Both Standard and Middle Filter OD analyses were conducted: • Standard OD analysis does not restrict the route trips take from beginning to the end of a trip (i.e. local streets, expressway, etc.) This analysis can be found in section 3. • Middle filter OD analysis restricts trips to a specified zone – they must pass through a certain zone to be included (i.e. a bridge, specific entrance ramp, etc.). In this case, the Verrazano Narrows Bridge was used as a filter zone. This analysis can be found in section 4. nyc.gov/dot 6 As presented to the BQE Expert Panel for informational/background purposes only. https://bqe-i278.com/en/expert-panel/documents Standard Origin-Destination Analysis of BQE Triple Cantilever Activity nyc.gov/dot 7 As presented to the BQE Expert Panel for informational/background purposes only. https://bqe-i278.com/en/expert-panel/documents BQE TRUCK ORIGIN-DESTINATION On BQE Triple-Cantilever (Atlantic Ave to Sands St) • The BQE is a critical inter-borough connection for all commercial vehicles and trips that either originate or are destined for New Jersey or Long Island. • Trucks represent 12% of the 155,071 daily vehicles passing through the BQE triple-cantilever section. • Of the 17,844 daily trucks, 52% are inbound and 48% are outbound. According to 2018 GPS data*: • 70% of AM inbound truck trips on the BQE (Atlantic to Sands) are coming from Staten Island and the Southwest Brooklyn IBZ (Sunset Park, Red Hook) destined primarily for Manhattan south of 59th, the Northern Brooklyn IBZ, the railyards in southern Queens, Hunts Point, and JFK Airport. • 57% of PM outbound truck trips on this section are coming from the Northern Brooklyn IBZ, the railyards in southern Queens, Hunts Point, and JFK Airport destined primarily for the Southern Brooklyn IBZ and the west shore of Staten Island. nyc.gov/dot *Data Source: Streetlight Insights 8 As presented to the BQE Expert Panel for informational/background purposes only. https://bqe-i278.com/en/expert-panel/documents AM Peak –Trip Origins Bound for the BQE within NYC • 89% of AM peak trips on the BQE Triple Cantilever (BQETC) start in Brooklyn and Staten Island • Almost 50% of the peak trips using the BQE start in Sunset Park area alone % of Total Commercial Top 5 Neighborhood Origin Vehicle Activity Sunset Park West (BK) 48.23% Carroll Gardens-Columbia Street-Red Hook (BK) 15.54% Borough Park (BK) 3.51% Gravesend (BK) 2.38% Mariner's Harbor-Arlington-Port Ivory- Graniteville (SI) 1.76% Park Slope-Gowanus (BK) 1.76% % of Total Commercial All Other Neighborhood Origins* Vehicle Activity New Jersey Neighborhoods (NJ) 11.59% All Other Brooklyn Neighborhoods (BK)* 8.96% All Other Staten Island Neighborhoods (SI)* 6.28% *Outside of the top 5 destinations noted in the above table, and aggregate of all other neighborhoods are tabulated within 25 mile limit of NYC 9 As presented to the BQE Expert Panel for informational/background purposes only. https://bqe-i278.com/en/expert-panel/documents AM Peak – Trip Origins Bound for the BQE from New Jersey • During the AM peak, NJ generates less commercial vehicle activity in comparison to Staten Island and Brooklyn along the Jersey City (BQETC) • For trips starting in NJ, the top 5 Woodbridge neighborhoods account for 9% of trips on the (BQETC) E Brunswick Bayonne • These trips originate primarily from heavy truck areas/industrial clusters (namely, Perth Amboy manufacturing and freight distribution centers servicing NYC. Hamilton Top 5 Neighborhood % of Total Commercial Vehicle Origins Activity Jersey City 3.24% East Brunswick 3.17% Perth Amboy 1.17% Bayonne 0.81% Woodbridge 0.52% Other New Jersey Mantua Neighborhoods 2.70% As presented to the BQE Expert Panel for informational/background purposes only. https://bqe-i278.com/en/expert-panel/documents 10 AM Peak – Trip Destinations within NYC via the BQE • Many commercial vehicle trips from the BQE are destined for IBZs (i.e. Maspeth and North Brooklyn, JFK), and Central Business Districts (CBDs) • During the AM Peak, 32% of trips from the BQE end in top 5 neighborhood destinations listed below. % of Total Commercial Top 5 Neighborhood Destinations Vehicle Activity Chinatown (MN) 8.02% Bushwick South (BK) 7.76% Greenpoint (BK) 6.47% North Side-South Side (BK) 5.46% Hunters Point-Sunnyside-West Maspeth (QN) 4.40% % of Total All other Neighborhood Commercial Vehicle Destinations Activity Long Island Neighborhoods 4.38% Bronx Neighborhoods 2.02% Other Manhattan Neighborhoods 28.36% Other Queens Neighborhoods 18.89% Other Brooklyn Neighborhoods 14.24% As presented to the BQE Expert Panel for informational/background purposes only. https://bqe-i278.com/en/expert-panel/documents 11 AM Peak – Trip Destinations Bound for Long Island via the BQE Hauppauge Medford Port Washington Hicksville Farmingdale Uniondale W Babylon *All additional neighborhoods outside of the top 5 destinations noted in the above table • During the AM peak, 4.4% of trips are destined for Top 5 Neighborhood % of Total Commercial Vehicle Long Island Destinations Activity Hauppauge 0.53% W Babylon 0.36% • 44% of Long Island bound trips from the BQE were Farmingdale 0.36% Hicksville 0.34% headed for the top 5 neighborhoods: Hauppauge, West Uniondale 0.34% Babylon, Farmingdale, Hicksville, Uniondale Other Long Island Neighborhoods 2.45% As presented to the BQE Expert Panel for informational/background purposes only.
Recommended publications
  • New York City Comprehensive Waterfront Plan

    New York City Comprehensive Waterfront Plan

    NEW YORK CITY CoMPREHENSWE WATERFRONT PLAN Reclaiming the City's Edge For Public Discussion Summer 1992 DAVID N. DINKINS, Mayor City of New lVrk RICHARD L. SCHAFFER, Director Department of City Planning NYC DCP 92-27 NEW YORK CITY COMPREHENSIVE WATERFRONT PLAN CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMA RY 1 INTRODUCTION: SETTING THE COURSE 1 2 PLANNING FRA MEWORK 5 HISTORICAL CONTEXT 5 LEGAL CONTEXT 7 REGULATORY CONTEXT 10 3 THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 17 WATERFRONT RESOURCES AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE 17 Wetlands 18 Significant Coastal Habitats 21 Beaches and Coastal Erosion Areas 22 Water Quality 26 THE PLAN FOR THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 33 Citywide Strategy 33 Special Natural Waterfront Areas 35 4 THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 51 THE EXISTING PUBLIC WATERFRONT 52 THE ACCESSIBLE WATERFRONT: ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES 63 THE PLAN FOR THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 70 Regulatory Strategy 70 Public Access Opportunities 71 5 THE WORKING WATERFRONT 83 HISTORY 83 THE WORKING WATERFRONT TODAY 85 WORKING WATERFRONT ISSUES 101 THE PLAN FOR THE WORKING WATERFRONT 106 Designation Significant Maritime and Industrial Areas 107 JFK and LaGuardia Airport Areas 114 Citywide Strategy fo r the Wo rking Waterfront 115 6 THE REDEVELOPING WATER FRONT 119 THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT TODAY 119 THE IMPORTANCE OF REDEVELOPMENT 122 WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT ISSUES 125 REDEVELOPMENT CRITERIA 127 THE PLAN FOR THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT 128 7 WATER FRONT ZONING PROPOSAL 145 WATERFRONT AREA 146 ZONING LOTS 147 CALCULATING FLOOR AREA ON WATERFRONTAGE loTS 148 DEFINITION OF WATER DEPENDENT & WATERFRONT ENHANCING USES
  • Appendix E: History and Projection of Traffic, Toll Revenues And

    Appendix E: History and Projection of Traffic, Toll Revenues And

    APPENDIX E HISTORY AND PROJECTION OF TRAFFIC, TOLL REVENUES AND EXPENSES and Review of Physical Conditions of the Facilities of Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority April 26, 2013 Prepared for the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority A Constituent Agency of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority By TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................................. E-1 Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority (TBTA) .......................................................... E-1 Metropolitan Area Arterial Network ............................................................................... E-3 Other Regional Toll Facilities .......................................................................................... E-4 Regional Public Transportation ....................................................................................... E-5 TOLL COLLECTION ON THE TBTA FACILITIES ................................................................ E-5 Present and Proposed Toll Structures and Operation ...................................................... E-5 E-ZPass Electronic Toll Collection System ..................................................................... E-8 TBTA‘s Role in E-ZPass ............................................................................................... E-10 Passenger Car Toll Rate Trends and Inflation ............................................................... E-11 HISTORICAL TRAFFIC, REVENUES AND EXPENSES AND ESTIMATED/BUDGETED NUMBERS
  • $223,355,000 Triborough Bridge and TUNNEL Authority Lehman

    $223,355,000 Triborough Bridge and TUNNEL Authority Lehman

    NEW ISSUE BOOK-ENTRY-ONLY $223,355,000 TRIBOROUGH BRIDGE AND TUNNEL AutHORITY (MTA Bridges and Tunnels) General Revenue Bonds, Series 2007A DATED: Date of Delivery DUE: November 15, as shown on the inside cover The Series 2007A Bonds are being issued to finance bridge and tunnel projects. The Series 2007A Bonds – • are general obligations of MTA Bridges and Tunnels, payable generally from the net revenues collected on the bridges and tunnels operated by MTA Bridges and Tunnels as described herein, and • are not a debt of the State or The City of New York or any other local government unit. MTA Bridges and Tunnels has no taxing power. In the opinion of Hawkins Delafield & Wood LLP, Bond Counsel to MTA Bridges and Tunnels, under existing law and relying on certain representations by MTA Bridges and Tunnels and assuming the compliance by MTA Bridges and Tunnels with certain covenants, interest on the Series 2007A Bonds is • excluded from a bondholder’s federal gross income under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, • not a preference item for a bondholder under the federal alternative minimum tax, and • included in the adjusted current earnings of a corporation under the federal corporate alternative minimum tax. Also in Bond Counsel’s opinion, under existing law, interest on the Series 2007A Bonds is exempt from personal income taxes of New York State or any political subdivisions of the State, including The City of New York. The Series 2007A Bonds are subject to redemption prior to maturity as described herein. The Series 2007A Bonds are offered when, as, and if issued, subject to certain conditions, and are expected to be delivered through the facilities of The Depository Trust Company, on or about June 20, 2007.
  • Bayonne Bridge Lesson Plan

    Bayonne Bridge Lesson Plan

    The Bayonne Bridge: The Beautiful Arch Resources for Teachers and Students [Printable and Electronic Versions] The Bayonne Bridge: The Beautiful Arch Resources for Teachers And Students [Printable and Electronic Versions] OVERVIEW/OBJECTIVE: Students will be able to understand and discuss the history of NOTES: the Bayonne Bridge and use science and engineering basics • Key words indicated in to investigate bridge design and test an arch bridge model. Bold are defined in call- out boxes. TARGET GRADE LEVEL: • Teacher-only text Fourth grade instruction, adaptable to higher levels as indicated with Italics. desired in the subjects of Social Studies and Engineering. FOCUS: In Part I, students learn about history of the Bayonne Bridge including the many engineering challenges encountered during the project and the people who helped overcome those challenges. In Part II, students learn engineering concepts to understand how bridges stay up and use these concepts to complete activities on bridge design before applying these concepts to theorize how the Bayonne Bridge works. MATERIALS: • Part I: DVD of “The Bayonne Bridge Documentary” • Part II: 2–4 heavy textbooks or 2 bricks per group; 2 pieces of “cereal box” cardboard or similar, 12 x 8 in; weights (anything small that can be stacked on the structure); red and blue marker, crayon or colored pencil for each student or group. The Bayonne Bridge: The Beautiful Arch Contents Teacher Materials | Part I: History of the Bayonne Bridge . T-1 Teacher Materials | Part II: Bridge Engineering . T-7 Student Materials | Part I: History of the Bayonne Bridge . S-1 Student Materials | Part II: Bridge Engineering .
  • Traffic Rules and Regulations/"Green Book" (PDF, 220

    Traffic Rules and Regulations/"Green Book" (PDF, 220

    TRAFFIC RULES AND REGULATIONS For the Holland Tunnel Lincoln Tunnel George Washington Bridge Bayonne Bridge Goethals Bridge Outerbridge Crossing Revised September 2016 The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey is a self-supporting agency of the States of New York and New Jersey. It was created by a compact between the two States in 1921 for the development of transportation facilities and the promotion and protection of commerce in the New York/New Jersey metropolitan region. At the top of the organization is the twelve-member Board of Commissioners, appointed by the Governors of New York and New Jersey. There are six members from each state who serve for six-year overlapping terms. The Commissioners serve with-out pay as a public service. They report directly to the Governors of the two States, who have veto power over Commissioners’ actions. A career staff of more than 7,000 employees, headed by the Executive Director, is responsible to the Board of Commissioners. Over the years the Port Authority, at the direction of the States of New York and New Jersey has developed airports, marine terminals, bridges and tunnels, bus terminals, the PATH rapid transit system, the World Trade Center and other facilities of commerce and transportation. All of this has been accomplished without burden to the taxpayers. These undertakings are public projects; all are built with moneys borrowed solely on the Port Authority’s credit. There is no power to tax, or to pledge the credit of the States. i FOREWORD This booklet is intended to provide the users of Port Authority tunnels and bridges with detailed and specific information concerning rules, regulations and toll rates established by the Port Authority to regulate the conduct of traffic moving in or upon these vehicular crossings.
  • The Port Authority of NY & NJ

    The Port Authority of NY & NJ

    The Port Authority of NY & NJ 2012 to 2015 TOLL RATE TABLE George Washington Bridge, Lincoln Tunnel, Holland Tunnel, Goethals Bridge, Outerbridge Crossing, Bayonne Bridge PEAK HOURS: Weekdays 6 - 10 a.m., 4 - 8 p.m., Sat. & Sun. 11a.m. - 9 p.m. OFF-PEAK HOURS: All other times OVERNIGHT HOURS for Trucks: 10 p.m. - 6 a.m. Weekdays Beginning Dec. 2, 2012 Dec. 1, 2013 Dec. 7, 2014 Dec. 6, 2015 VEHICLE TYPE Trk Trk Trk Trk Off-Peak Peak Cash Off-Peak Peak Cash Off-Peak Peak Cash Off-Peak Peak Cash Overnight Overnight Overnight Overnight Class Vehicles with Two Axles and 1 $8.25 $10.25 N/A $13.00 $9.00 $11.00 N/A $13.00 $9.75 $11.75 N/A $14.00 $10.50 $12.50 N/A $15.00 Single Rear Wheels Vehicles with Two Axles and 2 $22.00 $24.00 $19.00 $30.00 $26.00 $28.00 $23.00 $34.00 $30.00 $32.00 $27.00 $38.00 $34.00 $36.00 $31.00 $42.00 Dual Rear Wheels** 3 Vehicles with Three Axles** $33.00 $36.00 $28.50 $45.00 $39.00 $42.00 $34.50 $51.00 $45.00 $48.00 $40.50 $57.00 $51.00 $54.00 $46.50 $63.00 4 Vehicles with Four Axles** $44.00 $48.00 $38.00 $60.00 $52.00 $56.00 $46.00 $68.00 $60.00 $64.00 $54.00 $76.00 $68.00 $72.00 $62.00 $84.00 5 Vehicles with Five Axles** $55.00 $60.00 $47.50 $75.00 $65.00 $70.00 $57.50 $85.00 $75.00 $80.00 $67.50 $95.00 $85.00 $90.00 $77.50 $105.00 Vehicles with Six Axles or 6 $66.00 $72.00 $57.00 $90.00 $78.00 $84.00 $69.00 $102.00 $90.00 $96.00 $81.00 $114.00 $102.00 $108.00 $93.00 $126.00 more** + Each add'l Axle $11.00 $12.00 $9.50 $15.00 $13.00 $14.00 $11.50 $17.00 $15.00 $16.00 $13.50 $19.00 $17.00 $18.00 $15.50 $21.00 Class
  • Commercial User Guide Page 1 FINAL 1.12

    Commercial User Guide Page 1 FINAL 1.12

    E-ZPass Account User Guide Welcome to the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission’s E-ZPass Commercial Account program. With E-ZPass, you will be able to pass through a toll facility without exchanging cash or tickets. It helps ease congestion at busy Pennsylvania Turnpike interchanges and works outside of Pennsylvania for seamless travel to many surrounding states; anywhere you see the purple E-ZPass sign (see attached detailed listing). The speed limit through E-ZPass lanes is 5-miles per hour unless otherwise posted. The 5-mile per hour limit is for the safety of all E-ZPass customers and Pennsylvania Turnpike employees. If you have any questions about your E-ZPass account, please contact your company representative or call the PTC E-ZPass Customer Service Center at 1.877.PENNPASS (1.877.736.6727) and ask for a Commercial E-ZPass Customer Service Representative. Information is also available on the web at www.paturnpike.com . How do I install my E-ZPass? Your E-ZPass transponder must be properly mounted following the instructions below to ensure it is properly read. Otherwise, you may be treated as a violator and charged a higher fare. Interior Transponder CLEAN and DRY the mounting surface using alcohol (Isopropyl) and a clean, dry cloth. REMOVE the clear plastic strips from the back of the mounting strips on the transponder to expose the adhesive surface. POSITION the transponder behind the rearview mirror on the inside of your windshield, at least one inch from the top. PLACE the transponder on the windshield with the E-ZPass logo upright, facing you, and press firmly.
  • Client Service and Attention Drive Carl Schipfmann's

    Client Service and Attention Drive Carl Schipfmann's

    CLIENT SERVICE AND ATTENTION DRIVE CARL SCHIPFMANN’S LEADERSHIP Schipfmann takes responsibility for HNTB’s reputation when delivering bridge projects to clients. Whether you are his client, supervisor, coworker or friend, Carl Schipfmann is going to present you with his genuine self. With a reputation as a dynamic leader, Schipfmann dedicates himself to his projects by embedding himself into their intricate, day-to-day details. Schipfmann is a veteran bridge project manager in the Kansas City office whose expertise includes bridge design, inspection and construction administration. He currently serves on the Kansas City design team that is working on the cable-stayed unit of the Kosciuszko Bridge Replacement, a New York City design-build project replacing the bridge spanning New Town Creek between Brooklyn and Queens. He has served HNTB on many bridge-related design projects over the past 22 years, and has provided shop drawing review and answered requests for information to provide clarification on numerous projects, all within schedule constraints. “Carl loves to get in and get his hands dirty with the design,” said Marc Whitmore, project CARL schipFMANN PROJECT MANAGER manager in the Kansas City office. “He thrives on the challenge of figuring out how to KANSAS CITY OFFICE design and build different components of his projects and really shines when handling technical issues.” DETAIL-ORIENTED LEADERSHIP Schipfmann’s bridge teams seem to respond well to his leadership style, which is as much relationship-oriented as anything else. Rather than listening to him bark out orders, his teams become closely knit while learning from the example of his attention to detail and dedication to client service.
  • New York City Truck Route

    New York City Truck Route

    Staten Island Additional Truck and Commercial Legal Routes for 53 Foot Trailers in New York City Special Midtown Manhattan Rules Cross Over Mirrors Requirement Legal Routes for 53 Foot Trailers 10 11 12 13 14 15 Vehicle Resources The New York City interstate routes approved for 53 foot trailers are: The two rules below apply in Manhattan Due to the height of large trucks, it can North d Terrace ● I-95 between the Bronx-Westchester county line and I-295 on New York City m be difficult for truck drivers to see what is h Throgs from 14 to 60 Streets, and from 1 to 8 ic R ● I-295 which connects I-95 with I-495 Rich mo Avenues, inclusive. They are in effect happening directly in front of their vehicles. 95 n Thompskinville d L L NYCDOT Truck and Commercial Vehicle 311 ● I-695 between I-95 and I-295 Te Neck r Broadway Cross Over Mirrors, installed on front of the cab race Information Cross between the hours of 7 AM and 7 PM daily, ● I-495 between I-295 and the Nassau-Queens county line Bronx 95 www.nyc.gov/trucks 95 Expwy except Sundays. There may be different of a truck, are a simple way of eliminating a ZIP Code Index Expwy Av ● I-678 between I-95 and the John F. Kennedy International Airport To New Jersey h Turnpike ut 695 restrictions on particular blocks. Check truck driver’s front “blind spots” and allows the 10301 Staten Island L-14 o ● I-95 between I-695 and the New Jersey state line on the upper level of the S NYCDOT Truck Permit Unit 212-839-6341 carefully.
  • Verrazano-Narrows Bridge CCTV, VMS, CMS & Lane Controllers

    Verrazano-Narrows Bridge CCTV, VMS, CMS & Lane Controllers

    SYSTEMS ENGINEERING ANALYSIS REPORT Verrazano-Narrows Bridge CCTV, VMS, CMS & Lane Controllers VN-03 May, 2011 Prepared by MTA Bridges & Tunnels In cooperation with For Final PSE SEA May-2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Report Organization ....................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Intended Audience…………………………………………………………..………………….4 1.3 Scope……………………………………………………………………………..………………..5 2. MTA B&T ITS PLANNING PROCESS & ITS PROGRAM ........................................ 7 2.1 ITS PLANNING PROCESS OVERVIEW ......................................................................... 7 2.2 THE MTA B&T ITS ARCHITECTURE ............................................................................ 8 3. VN-SIE APPROACHES ITS SUBSYSTEMS ............................................................. 9 3.1 Portions of the Regional ITS Architecture Being Implemented ............................... 10 3.2 Project Level Architecture.. ......................................................................................... 12 3.3 Customized Market Package Analysis ....................................................................... 12 3.3.1 Traffic Surveillance ......................................................................................... 17 3.3.2 Freeway Control ............................................................................................. 17 3.3.3
  • 2016 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes

    2016 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes

    2016 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes TM NEW YORK CITY Bill de Blasio Polly Trottenberg Mayor Commissioner A member of the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council 2016 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes Contract C033467 2014-2015: PTDT14D00.E01 2015-2016: PTDT15D00.E01 2016-2017: PTDT16D00.E02 2017-2018: PTDT17D00.E02 The preparation of this report has been financed through the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Transit Administration and Federal Highway Administration. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council in the interest of information exchange. The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Federal Transit Administration, Federal Highway Administration or the State of New York. This report does not constitute a standard, specification or regulation. NYCDOT is grateful to the Metropolitan Transportation Authority Bridges and Tunnels (MTABT), the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ), and the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council (NYMTC) for providing data used to develop this report. This 2016 New York City Bridge Traffic Volumes Report was funded through the New York Metropolitan Transportation Council SFY 2017 Unified Planning Work Program project, Data Management PTDT17D00.E02, which was funded through matching grants from the Federal Transit Administration and from the Federal Highway Administration. Title VI Statement The New York Metropolitan Transportation Council is committed to compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, and all related rules and statutes.
  • Kosciuszko Bridge Project Pin X729.77.123

    Kosciuszko Bridge Project Pin X729.77.123

    DRAFT NEPA SCOPING MEMORANDUM: DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT KOSCIUSZKO BRIDGE PROJECT PIN X729.77.123 Project Limits Brooklyn-Queens Expressway (BQE)/Interstate 278 Between Morgan Avenue and the Long Island Expressway (LIE) Interchange Kings and Queens Counties April 2002 New York State U.S. Department of Transportation Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Kosciuszko Bridge Project Draft NEPA Scoping Memorandum I. Introduction The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), in cooperation with the New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT), will prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that will study and document possible improvements to the Kosciuszko Bridge, focusing on a 1.1-mile segment of the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway (BQE) portion of I-278, from Morgan Avenue in Kings County to the Long Island Expressway (LIE) interchange in Queens County. In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), a public "scoping" process will be conducted to identify the social, economic, and environmental issues to be evaluated in a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). This process ensures that the DEIS is a concise, accurate and comprehensive document that covers all concerns and issues for public and agency review. This Draft Scoping Memorandum is one of the first steps in the preparation of the DEIS for the Kosciuszko Bridge Project. It presents: (1) background information on the project, (2) the types of alternatives to be considered and the methods to be used to select alternatives for consideration in the DEIS, and (3) the projected procedures and methodologies to be followed in the preparation of the DEIS.