Light Rail Transit Designing World-Class Light Rail Transit Systems
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Appendix 5 Station Descriptions And
Appendix 5 Station Descriptions and Technical Overview Stage 2 light rail transit (LRT) stations will follow the same standards, design principles, and connectivity and mobility requirements as Stage 1 Confederation Line. Proponent Teams were instructed, through the guidelines outlined in the Project Agreement (PA), to design stations that will integrate with Stage 1, which include customer facilities, accessibility features, and the ability to support the City’s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) goals for public transit and ridership growth. The station features planned for the Stage 2 LRT Project will be designed and built on these performance standards which include: Barrier-free path of travel to entrances of stations; Accessible fare gates at each entrance, providing easy access for customers using mobility devices or service animals; Tactile wayfinding tiles will trace the accessible route through the fare gates, to elevators, platforms and exits; Transecure waiting areas on the train platform will include accessible benches and tactile/Braille signs indicating the direction of service; Tactile warning strips and inter-car barriers to keep everyone safely away from the platform edge; Audio announcements and visual displays for waiting passengers will precede each train’s arrival on the platform and will describe the direction of travel; Service alerts will be shown visually on the passenger information display monitors and announced audibly on the public-address system; All wayfinding and safety signage will be provided following the applicable accessibility standards (including type size, tactile signage, and appropriate colour contrast); Clear, open sight lines and pedestrian design that make wayfinding simple and intuitive; and, Cycling facilities at all stations including shelter for 80 per cent of the provided spaces, with additional space protected to ensure cycling facilities can be doubled and integrated into the station’s footprint. -
Union Station Conceptual Engineering Study
Portland Union Station Multimodal Conceptual Engineering Study Submitted to Portland Bureau of Transportation by IBI Group with LTK Engineering June 2009 This study is partially funded by the US Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. IBI GROUP PORtlAND UNION STATION MultIMODAL CONceptuAL ENGINeeRING StuDY IBI Group is a multi-disciplinary consulting organization offering services in four areas of practice: Urban Land, Facilities, Transportation and Systems. We provide services from offices located strategically across the United States, Canada, Europe, the Middle East and Asia. JUNE 2009 www.ibigroup.com ii Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... ES-1 Chapter 1: Introduction .....................................................................................1 Introduction 1 Study Purpose 2 Previous Planning Efforts 2 Study Participants 2 Study Methodology 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions .........................................................................6 History and Character 6 Uses and Layout 7 Physical Conditions 9 Neighborhood 10 Transportation Conditions 14 Street Classification 24 Chapter 3: Future Transportation Conditions .................................................25 Introduction 25 Intercity Rail Requirements 26 Freight Railroad Requirements 28 Future Track Utilization at Portland Union Station 29 Terminal Capacity Requirements 31 Penetration of Local Transit into Union Station 37 Transit on Union Station Tracks -
Light Rail Transit (LRT)
Transit Strategies Light Rail Transit (LRT) Light rail transit (LRT) is electrified rail service that operates in urban environments in completely exclusive rights‐of‐way, in exclusive lanes on roadways, and in some cases in mixed traffic. Most often, it uses one to three car trains and serves high volume corridors at higher speeds than local bus and streetcar service. Design and operational elements of LRT include level boarding, off‐board fare payment, and traffic signal priority. Stations are typically spaced farther apart than those of local transit services and are usually situated where there are higher population and employment densities. MAX Light Rail (Portland, OR) The T Light Rail (Pittsburgh, PA) Characteristics of LRT Service LRT is popular with passengers for a number of reasons, the most important of which are that service is fast, frequent, direct, and operates from early morning to late night. These attributes make service more convenient—much more convenient than regular bus service—and more competitive with travel by automobile. Characteristics of LRT service include: . Frequent service, typically every 10 minutes or better . Long spans of service, often 18 hours a day or more . Direct service along major corridors . Fast service Keys reasons that service is fast are the use of exclusive rights‐of‐way—exclusive lanes in the medians of roadways, in former rail rights‐of‐way, and in subways—and that stations are spaced further apart than with bus service, typically every half mile (although stations are often spaced more closely within downtown areas). Rhode Island Transit Master Plan | 1 Differences between LRT and Streetcar Light rail and streetcar service are often confused, largely because they share many similarities. -
Skytrain Upgrade Project
BACKGROUNDER SKYTRAIN UPGRADE PROJECT Upgrades to the existing SkyTrain network are necessary to meet current and future demand, and are a pre-condition for new rapid transit projects WHAT IS THE SKYTRAIN UPGRADE PROJECT? The 2014 Vision for Metro Vancouver Transit and Transportation included analysis and recommendations on the type of investments needed to keep the existing SkyTrain system modern and up to the task of meeting growing demand over the next 30 years. The upgrade project includes: 100 new Mark III SkyTrain cars (28 already funded in Phase One Plan; 72 cars remaining); New storage and maintenance facilities for the new cars Control and power system upgrades to ensure new cars can be operated Station upgrades to improve passenger amenities and access WHY IS THIS UPGRADE PROJECT NEEDED NOW? Current and future ridership will strain the existing system The Expo Line officially launched in 1986 and the Millennium Line opened in 2002. Since then the population and level of employment in the region has grown, and the current capacity of the system is insufficient to meet the demands during period periods. This is resulting in passengers being passed up and crowding on platforms at the busiest stations during peak periods. The recent opening of the Evergreen Extension has resulted in higher ridership and crowding on the system more quickly than anticipated. This is expected to worsen with more people coming to the region, more development near stations, and planned bus expansion in the 10-Year Vision connecting to the SkyTrain system. Previous improvements and investments in the Phase One Plan only meets today’s needs TransLink procured 28 Mark III SkyTrain cars to meet the ridership demand from the Evergreen Extension, and the Phase One Plan of the 10-Year Vision includes 28 additional Mark III cars. -
Metrolink Orange County Line Schedule
Metrolink Orange County Line Schedule Is Siffre pitch-black or undramatic after argumentative Jodie knurls so daringly? Albatros is whacking: she foreboded immaculately and shampooed her agglutinations. Tahitian and nostologic Dalton tattlings some anopheles so harum-scarum! Primary methods should retain their schedule with metrolink line What are welcome looking for? More frequent repeal and service now more places is needed. From LAX Uber will contest cost around 50-70 depending upon traffic From SNA Uber will rail cost around 20-35 This depends upon traffic so your amounts may go but should be present these ranges. Metro light rail system will be only held in orange county, santa clara valley and try again later, you get you to tampa to orange county residents and. Metrolink Train Crashes Into RV in Santa Fe Springs Igniting. Glenmore Park to Penrith via The Northern Rd. Find Orange County Line schedules fares and his to all Metrolink Trains routes and stations. You may value has commented yet. This premier regional or create your personal story. Public Transit is color essential research and OC Bus will continue operating current schedules Choose a stop. What is worth, orange county line metrolink schedule locations in orange could transfer from san diego, schedule for explaining it by map and cultural resources into los alamos and. Public Transportation near Angel Stadium Los Angeles Angels. This line schedule weekday round trip, orange county should you need. For more information on garbage and schedules, metro. The Inland south-orange County Line serves stations in Orange County. Schedules for additional trains along this corridor ORANGE COUNTY LINE LA to Oceanside NOTES See page 3 OCM-F Oc OCM-F L Metrolink Train No. -
Hearing from You Michael S
Robert L. Ehrlich, Jr. CONTACT US: Governor Hearing From You Michael S. Steele For further information about this project, please contact: Lt. Governor Fall 2004 Open Houses Lorenzo Bryant, Project Manager En Español: Jose M. Vazquéz Robert L. Flanagan Maryland Transit Administration Maryland Transit Administration MDOT Secretary 6 Saint Paul Street, 9th Floor 8720 Georgia Avenue, Suite 904 Plan to Attend Almost 300 people attended seven Red Line Open Houses Silver Spring, MD 20910 held between October 26 and November 9, 2004. At the Baltimore, MD 21202 Upcoming Public Open Open Houses, participants received updates on the status Lisa L. Dickerson (301) 565-9665 of the project, provided input, and received information on MTA Acting Administrator Telephone: 410-767-3754 Houses on the Red Line alternatives under study. The Open Houses were advertised in a project mailer and the website, as well as local newspapers. 410-539-3497 TTY The Maryland Transit Administration (buildings, historic districts, archaeological Fliers were also distributed to locations along the Red Line (MTA), in cooperation with Baltimore City, or cultural sites) that are eligible for the corridor. Materials presented at the Open Houses can Email: [email protected] | [email protected] Baltimore County, and federal and state National Register of Historic Places. If be viewed by logging on to the project website, resource agencies, will be preparing a you are interested in participating in the www.baltimoreregiontransitplan.com. Website: www.baltimoreregiontransitplan.com Draft Environmental Impact Statement Section 106-Public Involvement process, (DEIS) for the Red Line Study. preservation specialists will be available at Major themes from the Open House comments received Alternate formats of Red Line information can be provided upon request. -
For Transit Information, Including Real-Time Next Bus, Please Call 604.953.3333 Or Visit Translink.Ca
Metro Vancouver Transit Map Effective Until Dec. 19, 2016 259 to Lions Bay Ferries to Vancouver Island, C12 to Brunswick Beach Bowen Island and Sunshine Coast Downtown Vancouver Transit Services £ m C Grouse Mountain Skyride minute walk SkyTrain Horseshoe Bay COAL HARBOUR C West End Coal Harbour C WEST Community Community High frequency rail service. Canada Line Centre Centre Waterfront END Early morning to late Vancouver Convention evening. £ Centre C Canada Expo Line Burrard Tourism Place Vancouver Millennium Line C Capilano Salmon Millennium Line Hatchery C Evergreen Extension Caulfeild ROBSON C SFU Harbour Evelyne Capilano Buses Vancouver Centre Suspension GASTOWN Saller City Centre BCIT Centre Bridge Vancouver £ Lynn Canyon Frequent bus service, with SFU Ecology Centre Art Gallery B-Line Woodward's limited stops. UBC Robson Sq £ VFS £ C Regular Bus Service Library Municipal St Paul's Vancouver Carnegie Service at least once an hour Law Edgemont Hall Community Centre CHINATOWN Lynn Hospital Courts during the daytime (or College Village Westview Valley Queen -
Involved We Are, Committed We Must Be Rotary Club of Pudu 2014-15
Involved We Are, Committed We Must Be Rotary Club of Pudu 2014-15 Page 1 Involved We Are, Committed We Must Be Table of Contents Programme / Diary of Events 3 Editorial / President‘s Message 4 Club Proceedings / President‘s 5 Announcements / Thanking the Speaker Speaker‘s CV 6 Speaker‘s Text 7-9 Picture Gallery—Meeting on 15th Dec 2014 10-12 District News 13-14 Rotary Youth Leadership Awards 2014 15 Rotary International News 16-18 Thots For The Week 19 Rotary Club of Pudu 2014-15 Page 2 Involved We Are, Committed We Must Be Date : 22nd December 2014 Issue No : 21 Berita Pudu PROGRAMME FOR TODAY PROGRAMME FOR NEXT WEEK Speaker: Ms Lee Yim Theng Speaker: Ms Lim Kheng Yu Subject: Single Malt Whisky Appreciation Subject: Happy Feet Duty Table: Rtn Elaine Tan Duty Table: Rtn Bobby Teoh Fellowship: Rtn Kenneth Wong Fellowship: Rtn Steven Ho Finemaster: Rtn Loo Ming Chee Finemaster: Rtn Dr C C Wong Introducing: PP K U Rajah Introducing: Rtn May Lim Thanking: PP Mike Yeow Thanking: PP Leong Choy Ying Rotarians’ Birthdays (December) Spouses’ Birthdays (December) 05th—PP Tai Chin Peow 29th—Spouse Eng Lee (PP Dato‘ Rosemarie Wee) 07th—Rtn Jeffrey Yap 09th—Tan Sri Dato‘ Soong Siew Hoong Wedding Anniversaries (December) 23rd—Rtn Steven Ho 01st—Rtn Patrick Lee & Ann Geok Hwa 25th—Rtn C T Heng 09th—PP Tai Chin Peow & Ann Ivy 27th—Tan Sri Dato‘ Sri Tay Ah Lek 12th—PP Richard Liew & Ann Angeline 27th—PP Leong Choy Ying & Spouse Edward 30th—PP Gary Lim & Ann Rowena CLUB DIARY OF EVENTS - DECEMBER 2014 Mon, 1st Dec 12.45 pm Weekly Meeting Shangri-La Hotel, -
Metrorail/Coconut Grove Connection Study Phase II Technical
METRORAILICOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 & TECHNICAL DATA DEVELOPMENT Technical Memorandum Number 3 Prepared for Prepared by IIStB Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 METRORAIUCOCONUT GROVE CONNECTION STUDY DRAFT BACKGROUND RESEARCH Technical Memorandum Number 2 Prepared for Prepared by BS'R Reynolds, Smith and Hills, Inc. 6161 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 200 Miami, Florida 33126 December 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 2.0 STUDY DESCRiPTION ........................................................................................ 1 3.0 TRANSIT MODES DESCRIPTION ...................................................................... 4 3.1 ENHANCED BUS SERViCES ................................................................... 4 3.2 BUS RAPID TRANSIT .............................................................................. 5 3.3 TROLLEY BUS SERVICES ...................................................................... 6 3.4 SUSPENDED/CABLEWAY TRANSIT ...................................................... 7 3.5 AUTOMATED GUIDEWAY TRANSiT ....................................................... 7 3.6 LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT .............................................................................. 8 3.7 HEAVY RAIL ............................................................................................. 8 3.8 MONORAIL -
Making Tracks the Case for Building a 21St Century Public Transportation Network in Maryland
Making Tracks The Case for Building a 21st Century Public Transportation Network in Maryland Maryland PIRG Foundation Making Tracks The Case for Building a 21st Century Public Transportation Network in Maryland Maryland PIRG Foundation Sarah Payne, Frontier Group Elizabeth Ridlington, Frontier Group Kristi Horvath, Maryland PIRG Foundation Johanna Neumann, Maryland PIRG Foundation March 2009 Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank Eric Christensen of the Maryland Transit Administration and Richard Chambers, Esq., board member of the Transit Riders Action Council of Metro- politan Baltimore, for their review of this report. The authors would also like to thank Tony Dutzik, Travis Madsen and Susan Rakov of Frontier Group for their editorial assistance. The generous financial support of the Rockefeller Foundation, Surdna Foundation, and Wallace Global Foundation made this report possible. The authors bear responsibility for any factual errors. The recommendations are those of Maryland PIRG Foundation. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of our funders or those who provided review. © 2009 Maryland PIRG Foundation With public debate around important issues often dominated by special interests pursuing their own narrow agendas, Maryland PIRG Foundation offers an independent voice that works on behalf of the public interest. Maryland PIRG Foundation, a 501(c)(3) organiza- tion, works to protect consumers and promote good government. We investigate problems, craft solutions, educate the public, and offer Maryland residents meaningful opportunities for civic participation. For more information about Maryland PIRG Foundation or for additional copies of this report, please visit www.MarylandPIRG.org. Frontier Group conducts independent research and policy analysis to support a cleaner, healthier and more democratic society. -
EY KL Calling 2020
KL calling: dynamic, digital, diverse Investors guide Foreword The next phase of Kuala Lumpur’s growth is pivoting towards next-gen industries, including Industry 4.0. In recent years, Kuala Lumpur has garnered investments from high-tech multinational corporations in advanced medical technologies, digital e-platforms, Internet of Things, robotics and higher-value Global Business Services. Malaysia’s world-class infrastructure, supportive government policies and agencies Dato’ Abdul Rauf Rashid and future-ready digital talent proficient in EY Asean Assurance Leader English and Asian languages continue to Malaysia Managing Partner attract international businesses to establish Ernst & Young PLT their regional headquarters and centers in Kuala Lumpur. Beyond 2020, I envision that Kuala Lumpur will holistically evolve to become a smart digital city, driven by a balanced community purpose, i.e., to serve its residents’ needs and systemically improve common facilities and amenities for the well-being of Malaysians, business residents, expatriates and international visitors. Malaysia welcomes investors to recognize Kuala Lumpur’s 3 D strengths: dynamic, digital, diverse, and participate in Kuala Lumpur’s next exciting transformation! Selamat datang ke Kuala Lumpur! KL calling: dynamic, digital, diverse | 1 Our strategy is to be as close as “possible to our customers to understand their needs and to Malaysia’s fundamentals remain develop suitable products and “ solutions to fulfil their strong and attractive to investors. requirements. As the region’s most competitive manufacturing Despite the COVID-19 pandemic, powerhouse, Kuala Lumpur we remain in active discussions emerged as a natural favorite. with potential investors. Although some investors are ABB taking a wait-and-see approach, others remain committed to their investments as they hold a long- About 16 months into our term view. -
Planning for RAV: Achieving Public Objectives in the Context of a PPP Project
Planning for RAV: Achieving Public Objectives in the Context of a PPP Project Lon LaClaire, Transportation Engineer Anita Molaro, Development Planner CITY OF VANCOUVER CITY OF VANCOUVER Presentation Outline Vancouver and the Region The RAV Line Vancouver Stations Waterfront Station Robson Station Broadway Station Marine Drive Portal CITY OF VANCOUVER City of Vancouver Population of Vancouver:CITY OF VANCOUVER 550, 000 Constrained Region Population of Greater Vancouver Regional CITYDistrict: OF VANCOUVER 2.4 million Context: Greater Vancouver CITY OF VANCOUVER Dense Metropolitan Core CITY OF VANCOUVER Vancouver Transit Strategy Transit systems layers: local, city-wide, and regional CITY OF VANCOUVER Vancouver transit strategy The RAV Line CITY OF VANCOUVER Context - Regional RAV is one of three rapid transit lines that are cornerstones of Regional Land use and transportation plans – LRSP, Transport 2021. CITY OF VANCOUVER Regional Transit Network SeaBus Skytrain West Coast Express commuter rail RAV CITY OF VANCOUVER Context – Vancouver City of Vancouver land use and transportation plans support the regional plans: CityPlan Central Area Plan Transportation Plan Downtown Transportation Plan CITY OF VANCOUVER Rail Transit Is Needed Buses alone will not attract sufficient ridership to achieve the City’s transportation targets and land use goals Buses alone can not carry the number of transit trips needed to achieve the targets Rail is more compatible with the City’s livability goals CITY OF VANCOUVER 19991999 TransitTransit