FILED ELECTRONICALLY AND VIA COURIER Michael D. Schafler Michael.Schafler@FMC‐law.com November 3, 2011 DIRECT 416‐863‐4457

Ms. Kirsten Walli Board Secretary Ontario Energy Board 2300 Yonge Street PO Box 2319, 27th Floor Toronto, ON M4P 1E4

Dear Ms. Walli:

RE: Application by Canadian Distributed Antenna Systems Coalition ("CANDAS"); Board File No.: EB‐2011‐0120

We represent CANDAS in connection with its application to the Board regarding access to the power poles of licensed electricity distributors for the purpose of attaching wireless telecommunications equipment (“Application”).

Please find enclosed CANDAS’ motion for an order compelling THESL to provide proper answers to certain IRs.

CANDAS will file two paper copies of the above‐noted evidence as soon as possible.

Yours very truly,

(signed) Michael D. Schafler

MDS/ag cc: Mr. George Vinyard Helen Newland All Intervenors

57100336_1|TorLitigation EB-2011-0120

ONTARIO ENERGY BOARD

IN THE MATTER OF the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c. 15 (Schedule B);

AND IN THE MATTER OF an Application by the Canadian Distributed Antenna Systems Coalition for certain orders under the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998.

MOTION RECORD OF THE CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION

November 3, 2011 FRASER MILNER CASGRAIN LLP 77 King Street, Suite 400 Toronto Dominion Centre Toronto, ON M5K 0A1 Fax: (416) 863-4592

Helen T. Newland Telephone: (416) 863-4471 [email protected]

Michael D. Schafler Telephone: (416) 863-4457 [email protected]

Kathleen Burke Telephone: (416) 862-3466 [email protected]

Solicitors for the Applicants, Canadian Distributed Antenna Systems Coalition

57099844_1 1 TorLitigation TO: ONTARIO ENERGY BOARD Ms. Kirsten Walli Board Secretary

AND TO: WEIRFOULDS LLP Barristers & Solicitors Suite 1600, The Exchange Tower 130 King Street West P.O. Box 480 Toronto, ON M5X 1J5

Robert B. Warren Tel: (416) 365-1110 Fax: (416) 365-1876 Lawyers for the Consumers Council of Canada

AND TO: BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP Scotia Plaza, 40 King St. W. Toronto, ON M5H 3Y4

J. Mark Rodger Tel: (416) 367 6000 Fax: (416) 367-6749 Lawyers for Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited

AND TO: All other Intervenors

57099844_11TorLitigation INDEX TO MOTION RECORD

TAB DOCUMENT PAGE

1 Notice of Motion 1

2. Questions pertaining to THESL's letter to the Board dated August 5 13, 2010

THESL 5.3, Schedule 1(h) & (i) 5

THESL 5.3, Schedule 2 8

THESL Tab 5.1, Schedule 2 9

THESL 5.3, Schedule 3(d) 11

THESL 5.3, Schedule 4(a) & (f) 13

3. Questions pertaining to the use of THESL's poles 15

THESL 5.3, Schedule 10(e) 15

THESL Tab 5.1, Schedule 6 22

THESL 5.3, Schedule 32 25

THESL Tab 5.1, Schedule 3 27

THESL Tab 5.1, Schedule 15 & Attachment 1 28

THESL Tab 5.3, Schedule 6 47

THESL Tab 5.1, Schedule 7 51

THESL Tab 5.1, Schedule 15 54

THESL Tab 5.1, Schedule 16 60

THESL Tab 5.1, Schedule 27 63

THESL 5.4, Schedule 20(b) 65

4. The Application of CANDAS filed April 25, 2011 69

57099844_1 I TorLitigation TAB 1 1

EB-2011-0120

ONTARIO ENERGY BOARD

IN THE MATTER OF the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c. 15 (Schedule B);

AND IN THE MATTER OF an Application by the Canadian Distributed Antenna Systems Coalition for certain orders under the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998.

NOTICE OF MOTION

THE CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION ("CANDAS") will make a motion on a date and at a time to be fixed by the Ontario Energy Board (the "Board"), at the Board's Chambers at 2300 Yonge Street, Toronto, Ontario, in connection with the motion by Consumers Council of Canada ("CCC") filed on October 31, 2011 for similar relief ("CCC Motion").

PROPOSED METHOD OF HEARING: CANDAS proposes that the motion be heard orally.

. THE MOTION IS FOR:

1. An Order of the Board directing Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited ("THESL") to provide responsive answers to the following CANDAS interrogatories: general interrogatories 1(h), 1(i), 2, 3(d), 4(a), 4(f); Starkey interrogatories 10(e) and 32; and Yatchew interrogatory 20(b) (the "CANDAS IRs"); and

2. Such further and other relief that CANDAS may request and the Board may consider appropriate.

THE GROUNDS FOR THE MOTION ARE:

1. This motion is made pursuant to Rules 8 and 29.03 of the Board's Rules of Practice and Procedure;

57090669_6 I TorLitigation 2

2. THESL's responses to the CANDAS IRs are unresponsive, incomplete or have been improperly refused;

3. Answers to the CANDAS IRs are necessary so that CANDAS may adequately understand THESL's position and fully prepare for the hearing;

4. The CANDAS IRs are relevant to the issues raised by this Application;

5. The CANDAS IRs may be categorized as follows:

a. Questions pertaining to THESL's letter to the Board dated August 13, 2010 [Application, para. 2.3, Tab 211:

i. General Interrogatories - 1(h), 1(i), 2, 3(d), 4(a) and 4(f);

b. Questions pertaining to the use of THESL's poles [Application, paras. 3.11, 10.9, 10.11-10.38];

i. Starkey Interrogatories —10(e) and 32;

ii. Yatchew Interrogatories — 20(b); and

6. The CCC Motion;

THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE will be used at the hearing of the Motion:

1. Relevant documents forming part of the record of this proceeding and as contained in the Motion Record, filed;

2. Such further and other evidence as counsel may advise and this Board may permit.

1 The references to the relevant sections in the Application are not exhaustive.

57090669_6 I TorLitigation 3

November 3, 2011 FRASER MILNER CASGRAIN LLP 77 King Street, Suite 400 Toronto Dominion Centre Toronto, ON M5K 0A1 Fax: (416) 863-4592

Helen T. Newland Telephone: (416) 863-4471 [email protected]

Michael D. Schafler Telephone: (416) 863-4457 [email protected]

Kathleen Burke Telephone: (416) 862-3466 [email protected]

Solicitors for the Applicants, Canadian Distributed Antenna Systems Coalition

TO: ONTARIO ENERGY BOARD Ms. Kirsten Walli Board Secretary

AND TO: WEIRFOULDS LLP Barristers & Solicitors Suite 1600, The Exchange Tower 130 King Street West P.O. Box 480 Toronto, ON M5X 1J5

Robert B. Warren

Tel: (416) 365-1110 Fax: (416) 365-1876

Lawyers for the Consumers Council of Canada

AND TO: BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP Scotia Plaza, 40 King St. W. Toronto, ON M5H 3Y4

J. Mark Rodger

57090669_6 I TorLitigation 4

Tel: (416) 367 6000 Fax: (416) 367-6749

Lawyers for Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited

AND TO: All other Intervenors

57090669_6 I TorLitigation TAB 2

5

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.3 Schedule 1 Filed: 2011 Sep 22 Page 1 of 3

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

1 INTERROGATORY 1:

2 Reference(s): none provided

3

4 (a) On what date did THESL adopt the "no wireless" policy? 5 (b) Provide a copy of THESL's "no wireless" policy, as adopted.

6 (c) Has THESL amended or revised the "no wireless" policy since its adoption? If yes,

7 please provide a copy of the amended or revised policy.

8 (d) Provide copies of THESL's written policy with respect to attachments to distribution

9 poles as it existed prior to the submission date of the August 13, 2010 letter to the Board

10 ("THESL Letter"). 11 (e) Did THESL's Board of Directors approve or otherwise endorse the "no wireless"

12 policy?

13 (f) If the response to (e) is "yes", provide the date of the meeting at which this occurred

14 and a list of those Board members who voted to adopt a "no wireless" policy.

15 (g) If the adoption of the "no wireless" policy was not endorsed by the THESL Board of

16 Directors, by vote or otherwise, how was the Board of Directors advised of THESL's

17 adoption of the "no wireless" policy?

18 (h) Were any presentations (oral or in writing) made to the THESL Board of Directors in

19 relation to any of the subjects discussed in the THESL Letter, prior to the letter being

20 filed with the Ontario Energy Board ("Board")? If yes, provide particulars of any oral

21 presentations and copies of any written presentations, including, without limitation,

22 power points, notes, memoranda, executive summaries and any similar writing.

23 (i) Provide copies of all drafts, including notes to draft, of the THESL Letter.

24

25

6

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.3 Schedule 1 Filed: 2011 Sep 22 Page 2 of 3

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

RESPONSE:

2 (a) This in an inaccurate summary of THESL' s position with regard to wireless

3 attachments. THESL's policy, clearly stated in the August 13, 2010 letter, is that

4 THESL does not believe that DAS or any other wireless attachers have a right to

5 attach wireless equipment to THESL poles pursuant to the CCTA Decision. The

6 Board's 2005 CCTA Decision did not mandate Ontario distributors to

7 accommodate wireless attachments on their distribution poles. In particular, the

8 issue and subject of wireless attachments was not raised, considered or addressed

9 in the CCTA Decision or the CCTA proceeding. The CCTA Settlement

10 Agreement explicitly excluded wireless as an unsettled issue and the Board

11 accepted that Settlement Agreement as part of the CCTA proceeding, and as such,

12 the CCTA Decision did not encompass wireless.

13

14 (b) Please see the response in (a) above. THESL has not developed any particular

15 written policies with respect to wireless since that was unnecessary because the

16 CCTA Decision did not mandate Ontario distributors to accommodate wireless

17 attachments on their distribution poles.

18

19 (C) Please see the response in (a) and (b) above.

20

21 (d) THESL does not have written policies over and above those provided in Tab 5.1,

22 Schedule 1, Attachment 1 (Section - 23: Foreign Attachments, Index of

23 Standards.)

24

7

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Intenogatory Responses Tab 5.3 Schedule 1 Filed: 2011 Sep 22 Page 3 of 3

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

1 (e) There was no need to take anything to THESL's Board because THESL had not

2 adopted a "no wireless" policy at alleged by CANDAS. The Board's 2005 CCTA

3 Decision did not mandate Ontario distributors to accommodate wireless

4 attachments on their distribution poles. Please also see the response in (a) above.

5

6 (f) Not applicable.

7

8 (g) Not applicable.

9 10 (h) THESL declines to respond to this interrogatory on the basis that the information 11 requested is privileged as being in contemplation of litigation. 12

13 (i) THESL declines to respond to this interrogatory on the basis that the information

14 requested is privileged as being in contemplation of litigation. 8

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.3 Schedule 2 Filed: 2011 Sep 22 Page 1 of 1

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

1 INTERROGATORY 2: 2 Reference(s): none provided

3 4 Does the "no wireless" policy apply to the street lighting poles that are to be transferred

5 to THESL from THESI?

6

7 RESPONSE: 8 Please refer to the responses in Tab 5.3, Schedule 1 and Tab 5.1, Schedule 2. 9

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.1 Schedule 2 Filed: 2011 Sep 22 Page 1 of 2

RESPON' SES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

INTERROGATORY 2:

2 Reference(s): Byrne, paras. 3 and 5

3 4 (a) Provide a table that shows the breakdown, by pole type (i.e., cedar, various classes of

5 concrete, steel, other), of the 140,000 THESL poles and the 40,000 THESI poles that are

6 to be transferred to THESL, both referenced in paragraph 3.

7 (b) Do the statements on page 2, paragraph 5, pertain equally to the 40,000 THESI poles

8 that are to be transferred to THESL?

9 (C) What is the average life span of a: 10 (i) Cedar pole

11 (ii) Steel pole

12 (iii) Concrete pole

13 14 RESPONSE: s (a) From THESL's asset records, the following is the breakdown by pole type, for all 16 poles listed as THESL and THESI. Information on all the composition of all

17 (current) streetlight poles is provided below. It is not possible with reasonable effort

18 and within the given timelines to provide the composition of only those streetlight

19 poles that will be transferred to THESL, and in any event, production of the information requested would be onerous and is not justified by the probative value of 21 that information.

2?

23

24

25 1 0

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.1 Schedule 2 Filed: 2011 Sep 22 Page 2 of 2

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

POLE MATERIAL THESL THESI

Wood 101,710 3,096 Concrete 38,218 38,897 Steel 3,146 4,607 Missing Data 1,258 5,814 Aluminum 472 4,263 Fibreglass 27 43 Iron 7 21 TOTAL 144,838 56,741

2 (b) Streetlighting poles — currently THESI assets - were erected for a different purpose

3 and have different physical characteristics than THESL's distribution poles, which

4 carry primary voltage. THESL only received approval from the Board to transfer

5 certain streetlighting poles from THESI to THESL in August 2011, and the related

6 transactions have not occurred yet. Accordingly, THESL is currently in the process

7 of transitioning these assets, including assessing the appropriate standards, safety, 8 operational and other considerations that apply in respect of streetlighting poles. It

9 would be premature for THESL to speculate on the considerations that would apply

10 to those streetlighting poles. Further, streetlighting poles are not essential facilities

11 for wireless attachers and the CCTA Decision does not apply to THESI.

12

13 (C) THESL uses the following approximations for pole life span: 14 (i) Cedar pole — 40 years

15 (ii) Steel pole — 50 years

16 (iii) Concrete pole — 50 years

17

18

11

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.3 Schedule 3 Filed: 2011 Sep 22 Page 1 of 2

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

1 INTERROGATORY 3:

2 Reference(s): none provided

3

4 (a) Prior to adopting or implementing the "no wireless" policy, did THESL request any 5 input from the Board or Board staff regarding this policy?

6 (b) Why did THESL not wait for the Board to reply to the THESL Letter, prior to

7 adopting the "no wireless" policy? 8 (c) Is it THESL's practice to consult with the Board or Board staff prior to implementing

9 new policies or changing existing policies?

10 (d) Prior to adopting the "no wireless" policy did THESL seek and obtain legal advice as

11 to the application of the CCTA Order to wireless attachments?

12 (e) Did THESL receive any form of acknowledgement of receipt, by the Board, of the

13 THESL Letter? If yes, provide copies of all correspondence received from the Board or

14 its staff in this regard.

15

16 RESPONSE:

17 (a) Please refer to the response in Tab 5.3, Schedule 1. THESL formed its conclusion

18 regarding the applicability of the CCTA Decision independently and wrote to the

19 Board on August 13, 2010 to advise the Board of that fact and to invite the Board

20 to contact THESL if the Board had any concerns.

21

22 (b) Please see the response in (a) above. At no time has the Board expressed

23 concerns with respect to THESL's position as articulated over a year ago in its

24 August 13, 2010 letter.

25 1 2

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.3 Schedule 3 Filed: 2011 Sep 22 Page 2 of 2

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

(c) THESL's approach to policy management is dependent on the specific issues and

2 circumstances attending each policy question. Where THESL believes it is

3 appropriate to consult the Board, it does so.

4

5 (d) THESL declines this interrogatory on the basis that the information sought is

6 privileged as being in contemplation of litigation.

7 8

9 (e) No.

13

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.3 Schedule 4 Filed: 2011 Oct 3 Page 1 of 1

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

INTERROGATORY 4: Reference(s): none provided

3 4 (a) Did THESL consult with any Canadian Carrier, including DAScom, Public Mobile, 5 Rogers, Telus and Bell, prior to adopting its "no wireless" policy?

6 (i) If yes, with whom did THESL consult?

7 (ii) If yes, what feedback was received and from whom?

8 (b) Was the THESL Letter served on affected and interested parties? If not, why not?

9 (c) As of August 13, 2010 how many separate parties had wireless equipment attached to 10 THESL poles? Provide the names of such parties, the number of poles attached to, the 11 type of the equipment so attached, and the date on which those parties first started

12 attaching wireless equipment to the THESL poles.

13 (d) Is it THESL's intention to decline to review all attachment agreements with the

14 parties indentified in response to (c) at the expiry of their pole attachment agreements 15 with THESL?

16 (e) Is it THESL's intention to require all parties, identified in response to (c), to remove 17 their wireless attachments from THESL poles at the expiration of the attachment 18 agreement?

19 (f) Has THESL had any negotiations or discussions with any of the parties who have zo attached wireless equipment with respect to terms and conditions on which attachment

21 will be available in the future?

22

23 RESPONSE:

24

14

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.3 Schedule 4 Filed 2011 Oct 3 Page 2 of 2

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

I (a) THESL disagrees with the premise of this question. THESL has not adopted a "no

2 wireless" policy. Please see the response in Tab 5.3, Schedule 1.

3

4 (b) THESL's letter was addressed to the Ontario Energy Board and as it was not filed

5 in the context of any proceeding, so THESL had no obligation to serve on any

6 particular parties.

7

8 (C) To produce this information would require an exhaustive examination of THESL's 9 records and cannot be completed within the timelines of this proceeding. The 10 information has questionable relevance and would be overly burdensome to 11 produce relative to its probative value (if any).

12

13 (d) THESL reviews matters of contractual negotiation on a case-by-case basis, and

14 declines to speak to future contingent events in this regard.

15

16 (e) Please see the response in (d) above.

17

18 (f) THESL is unable to interpret this question as worded. TAB 3

15

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.3 Schedule 10 Filed: 2011 Oct 3 Page 1 of 1

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

1 INTERROGATORY 10:

2 Reference(s): THESL's June 2011 Letter, Section 5

3

4 "CANDAS does not represent a public interest that is in any way relevant to the Board's 5 mandate. CANDAS represents a consortium of commercial private interests. The public

6 interest in this proceeding centres around: (i) ensuring that LDCs and electricity

7 ratepayers are not subsidizing a private business model and otherwise undermining a 8 competitive market; (ii) ensuring that the safety and reliability of the distribution system 9 is not compromised; and (iii) ensuring that scarce pole attachment space is appropriately to value and efficiently allocated among numerous competing demands for that very limited 1 1 sp ace." 12 (a) Please provide examples of how the introduction of wireless equipment and antennas

13 would compromise the safety and reliability of the distribution system in a way that is

14 different from the installation of

15 (i) Cable TV equipment and wireline attachments

16 (ii) Electricity distribution hardware including transformers, capacitors, breakers, 17 power conductors or other hardware routinely installed on distribution poles

18 (iii) Copper cables, splice enclosures and power supplies

19 (iv) Traffic control boxes, security cameras, public safety hardware

20 (V) SCADA or SmartGrid systems

21 (vi) WiFi equipment and antenna systems

22 (b) What is the estimated number of attachment positions available for each pole type

23 owned or controlled by THESL?

24 (c) What percentage of the poles currently owned or controlled by THESL have

25 attachments? Please provide a breakdown by pole type and identify the number and type

16

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.3 Schedule 10 Filed: 2011 Oct 3 Page 2 of 2

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

of attachments.

2 (d) What percentage of the poles currently owned or controlled by THESL have

3 attachments in the communication space? Please provide a breakdown by pole type and

4 identify the number and type of wireless attachments. 5 (e) What percentage of the poles currently owned or controlled by THESL have wireless

6 attachments? Please provide a breakdown by pole type and identify the number and type

7 of wireless attachments.

8 (f) What percentage of THESL owned or controlled poles have attachments, wireline,

9 equipment or otherwise, in the "unusable space" or otherwise in the space below the lo communication space?

ii (g) Does THESL object to the placement of equipment such as optical converters or p battery backup in the "unusable space" or otherwise to the space below the

13 communication space provided appropriate Electrical Standards Association ("ESA") and 14 other safety guidelines are met? If yes, please explain why THESL objects to placing 15 equipment in the "unusable space" under such conditions.

16 (h) Is there any equipment which THESL believes could be acceptable to place in the

17 "unusable space"? If yes, what equipment and under what conditions?

18 (i) What percentage of poles does THESL believe are at full capacity and could not

19 support additional attachments if "make-ready" work or additional support, e.g. guy

20 wires, were added? 21 (j) Based on the number of poles owned or controlled, or to be owned or controlled by

22 THESL, please explain how the use of approximately 790 poles that were to be used for

23 the wireless attachments of DAScom's Toronto DAS Network would greatly impact the

24 available attachment space on THESL poles.

25 (k) Does THESL believe that there could be more than three attachments in the

17

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.3 Schedule 10 Filed: 2011 Oct 3 Page 3 of 3

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

communications space provided ESA and other safety guidelines were met and the as-built structure would pass structural and wind loading analysis?

3 (1) Has THESL evaluated options for increasing the number if attachments on the

4 distribution poles including;

5 (i) Use of standoff brackets that convert a single attachment to 3 or more wireline

6 attachments

7 (ii) Overlashing multiple cables onto a single messenger cable

8 (iii) Increasing the available communication space on taller poles through power

9 "make ready" engineering and commonly used construction standards and

10 practices 11 (iv) Allowing wireline carriers or antenna attachments to be made on the field

12 side of the pole as opposed to the road side of the pole (pole boxing)

13 (V) Use of the "unused space" for placement of wireless equipment with antennas

14 on the field side of the pole so as to not consume any existing attachment points

15 on the road side of the pole 16 (vi) Decreasing space between wireline attachments to allow for additional

17 attachments or any other means of making reasonable accommodation to all

18 Canadian Carriers making applications to attach

19 If yes, please describe the research that was performed and provide any studies that were

20 produced as a result, including specific references to ESA 22/04, that resulted in their 91 exclusion from consideration. If not, please explain for each numbered section, why

22 these methods haven't been considered?

23 (m) What is THESL's criteria for efficiently allocating "scarce pole attachment space"

24 among numerous competing demands? Please provide the decision metrics THESL uses 25 to determine if and when poles are available and who can attach to poles if they are

1 8

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.3 Schedule 10 Filed: 2011 Oct 3 Page 4 of 4

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

I available.

2 (n) Does THESL have any written or unwritten policy regarding reservations of

3 attachment space in the communication space? If yes, which entities are entitled to a 4 reserved space on all or some number of poles? 5 (o) Provide copies of the distribution pole attachment agreement(s) as between Toronto

6 Hydro (as it then was) and Toronto Hydro Telecom (as it then was).

7 (p) Provide copies of the distribution pole attachment agreement(s) as between THESL

8 and Cogeco in respect of the One Zone network.

9 (q) Provide copies of the distribution pole attachment agreement as between THESI and 10 Cogeco in respect of One Zone attachments to poles that are to be transferred to THESL.

ii (r) Do any existing attachers have a contractual right to reserve space on THESL poles?

12 If yes, please disclose who these entities are and what process is used when a Canadian

13 Carrier requests access to poles with available space that are reserved by others with a

14 contractual right to use the available attachment points.

15

16 RESPONSE:

17 (a) THESL disagrees with the premise of this question. In particular, THESL never

18 stated that "the introduction of wireless equipment and antennas would

19 compromise the safety and reliability of the distribution system", except to the

70 extent that THESL has safety, operational and cost concerns with hosting wireless

21 attachments (which is detailed in the affidavit of Ms. Byrne — see in particular

22 paragraphs 40-55).

23

24 (b) THESL standards do not speak to an estimated number of attachment positions

25 available for each THESL Pole. THESL standards speak to the number of

19

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.3 Schedule 10 Filed: 2011 Oct 3 Page 5 of 5

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

telecommunications attachments allowed on any given THESL Pole: which is

2 three, within the communications space. Please see Standard 23-3100 in Tab 5.1,

3 Schedule 1, Attachment 1.

4

5 (C) Please see the responses in Tab 5.1, Schedules 2, 7 part (d) and 15.

6

7 (d) Please see the response in Tab 5.1, Schedule 7.

8

9 (e) Please see the response in Tab 5.1, Schedule 6.

10 (f) Please see the responses in Tab 1, Schedule 21; Tab 5.2, Schedule 17; and Tab

12 5.1, Schedules 7 and 15.

13

14 (g) THESL cannot answer this question in the abstract. THESL reviews attachment 15 applications on a case-by-case basis (including examining the attachment type and

16 whether the CCTA Decision applies), and before approving any such application,

17 would need ensure that all internal and external standards are met.

18

19 (h) Please see (g) above as well as the response in Tab 1, Schedule 21.

20

21 (i ) Please see the response in Tab 5.1, Schedule 7, part (d). Whether any given 22 THESL pole could not support additional attachments if "make-ready" work or 23 additional support were added, is considered on a case-by-case basis.

25 (j) Please see the responses in Tab 5.1, Schedules 2 and 7. Placement of wireless

20

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.3 Schedule 10 Filed: 2011 Oct 3 Page 6 of 6

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

ancillary equipment requires connection of that equipment via wireline

2 attachments to the rest of the operator's network, and will therefore create the

3 need for an incremental wireline attachment for all those mini-systems.

4

5 (k) No. Please see (b) above.

6

7 (1) 8 (I) No. 9 (ii) No. 10 (iii) No. Please see (b) above and the CCTA Decision. 11 (iv) No. 17 (v) No. 13 (vi) No. THESL has had no need to evaluate this.

14

15 (m) THESL does not currently have an explicit procedure for "allocation" of THESL

16 Pole Space. THESL processes applications for NDAs on a first-come-first-serve

17 basis while following its current Standards and processes. See affidavit of Ms.

18 Byrne, at paragraph 18, as well as the response in Tab 1, Schedule 1.

19

20 (n) No.

21

22 (o) The information sought is not relevant to this proceeding and in any event, is

23 confidential.

24

25 (p) THESL does not have any records of an agreement with Cogeco in respect of One 21

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.3 Schedule 10 Filed: 2011 Oct 3 Page 7 of 7

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

I Zone.

2

3 (q) THESI is not a party to this proceeding and therefore the information sought is not 4 relevant.

5

6 (r) No.

7

8

22

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.1 Schedule 6 Filed: 2011 Sep 30 Page 1 of 3

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

INTERROGATORY 6: 2 Reference(s): Byrne, para. 4

3

4 (a) Are the poles from each of the six former municipal electric distribution utilities 5 subject to the same engineering and construction standards?

6 (b) If the response to (a) is "no", compare and contrast the various applicable legacy

7 standards.

8 (c) In the event that a THESL standard conflicts with OR 22/04, CSA C22.3 No. 1, or

9 Ontario OSHA, which standard applies? 10 (d) Does THESL attempt to reconcile conflicting standards in the field? If so, explain the 11 process by which this is achieved and the time it takes to correct the conflict.

12 (e) Describe and explain how legacy variations in distribution equipment configurations

13 etc. are managed visaàtvis the THESL employees and contractors that work on THESL

14 poles. 15 (0 Is it THESL's position that such legacy variations constitute a safety issue or concern?

16

17 RESPONSE:

18 (a) No. Existing "legacy" assets are not expected to meet current standards, and

19 accordingly, THESL performs like-for-like maintenance on legacy assets without

20 rebuilding to current standards. Any new construction requiring an incremental change to the asset requires assessment of the extent to which current engineering and 79 construction standards apply, and replacement of a legacy asset is done to current

23 THESL Construction Standards.

24

23

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.1 Schedule 6 Filed: 2011 Sep 30 Page 2 of 3

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

(b) The relevance of such information to this proceeding is minimal. In any event, the

2 onerous nature of generating this information is not justified by its low probative

3 value. THESL cannot provide a meaningful response to this interrogatory within the

4 timelines provided in this proceeding.

5

6 (C) O.Reg. 22/04 authorizes the creation of company standards. If a conflict arose

7 between the OSHA or CSA that THESL could not resolve itself, given its ability to

8 create company standards, it would review the specific situation, and could ask for

9 input from other members of the industry, including ESA, the MOL or could ask CSA

10 to review the conflict and propose a resolution through its standards-making 11 processes. As a general matter, the ESA, MOL and the CSA do not overlap in their

12 subjects: ESA oversees the legislation for the safety of the public related to the

13 electricity distribution system, MOL oversees the legislation for worker health and

14 safety, and the CSA publishes standards for design, construction, and maintenance of

15 the electricity distribution system.

16

17 (d) Please see the response in (c) above. THESL employees are expected to follow

18 THESL Standards when conducting their work. If THESL employees have any

19 concerns when performing work, they are expected to follow established protocols

20 with regard to questions about job design, or Standards, or unsafe work concerns.

21

22 (e) THESL employees gain experience on the various existing assets during their training

23 and apprenticeship, and through their ongoing work experiences. For example, both

24 CPLP apprentices, and staff in groups that performance emergency response, are

25 rotated across the city to gain, and maintain their knowledge base. 24

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.1 Schedule 6 Filed: 2011 Sep 30 Page 3 of 3

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

1 2 (f) No. As stated in Ms. Byrne's affidavit at paragraph 4 it is THESL's position that

3 such legacy assets materially contribute to the way in which the configuration,

4 condition and congestion of THESL Poles today is highly varied.

25

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.3 Schedule 32 Filed: 2011 Oct 3 Page 1 of 1

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

I INTERROGATORY 32: 2 Reference(s): Application, para. 10.21

3 Responses to CCC 1 and CEA 9-1

4

5 (a) Produce any and all documents, including contracts, evidencing the terms and

6 conditions upon which THESL (or any affiliate) permitted the "One Zone" network to be 7 attached to its poles. 8 (b) How many of THESL's (or its affiliates') poles are currently utilized to hold:

9 (i) TTC communications equipment

10 (ii) "One Zone" communications equipment I I (iii) Any other telecommunications equipment 12 (c) For each of the equipment identified in operations (b)(i), (ii) and (iii) provide:

13 (i) The identity of the pole (by location and alpha-numerical designation)

14 (ii) A photograph of each pole, with all communications equipment clearly visible

15

16 RESPONSE: 17 (a) THESL does not have a contract with One Zone for pole attachments. THESI is

18 not a party to this hearing and declines to provide this information.

19

20 (b) Please see the responses in Tab 5.1, Schedules 2, 3, 15, as well as Tab 5.3, 21 Schedule 6.

22 23 (c) THESL is in the process of gathering this data in the ordinary course, but due to the 24 time-consuming nature of the project, it is not possible to have this data available 25 for the purposes of the present proceeding. In any event, THESL declines this 26

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.3 Schedule 32 Filed: 2011 Oct 3 Page 2 of 2

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

interrogatory on the basis that production of the information sought is unduly onerous as compared with its probative value, and/or not relevant.

27

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.1 Schedule 3 Filed: 2011 Sep 22 Page 1 of I

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

INTERROGATORY 3: 2 Reference(s): Byrne, paras. 3 and 5

3

4 (a) Does THESL provide services to THESI in connection with the maintenance and 5 operation of THESI poles?

6 (b) Do the THESL-specific standards (as opposed to external standards such as ESA and

7 CSA standards) that govern the construction, operation and maintenance of THESL 8 distribution poles apply, mutatis mutandi to THESI poles?

9 (c) If the response to (b) is "no", describe how THESL standards differ from THESI 10 standards in this regard.

11

12 RESPONSE:

13 a) THESI is not a party to this proceeding and therefore the information sought is not

14 relevant, however THESL currently provides certain limited services to THESI in

15 connection with the maintenance and operation of THESI poles.

16

17 b) No.

18

19 c) THESI is not a party to this proceeding and therefore the information sought is not

20 relevant, however there are certain standards applicable to LDC primary distribution

21 assets and a separate set of standards applicable to Streetlighting. The Standards for

22 Streetlighting contain information specific to the poles used for Streetlighting that are

23 not used for primary electricity distribution. Further, many THESL LDC Standards

24 are not relevant to Streetlighting, such as the distribution standards for switches.

25 28

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Lirnited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Reponses Tab 5.1 Schedule 15 * Filed 2011 Oct 3 Page 1 of 6

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

I INTERROGATORY 15: 2 Reference(s): Byrne, para. 16

3 4 a) Do non-communications attachments on power poles present physical impediments to

5 pole workers accessing or climbing the poles?

6 b) Are line crews trained to navigate around non-communication attachments?

7 c) Explain how navigating around non-communications, non-distribution attachments

8 ("NDAs") differs from navigating around communications NDAs?

9 d) CCTV cathers install power supplies in the unused portion of the pole, the 10 communication space and the separation space. Does THESL categorize these types

11 of power supplies as communication or non-communications NDAs? 12 e) Would splice enclosures installed by the ILEC's or CLEC's in the unused portion of

13 the pole, in the communication space or in the separation space, be considered

14 communication or non-communications NDAs? 15 f) Provide a list of all non-wireline (i.e. fibre, cable or other) NDAs attached to THESL

16 poles and, for each such NDA, describe:

17 (i) The geographic location of each NDA

18 (ii) The specific type of NDA attachment (e.g. surveillance camera, Wi-Fi

19 antenna, battery unit, DAS antenna, etc.)

20 (iii)The owner of each NDA 21 (iv)The size, weight, dimensions and other physical specifications of each NDA

22 (v) The attachment location of each NDA on the pole (distribution space,

23 communication space, unusable space, etc.)

24 (vi)The attachment method (e.g. through bolt, metal band, in-line (i.e. on-cable,

25 etc.)

29

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Reponses Tab 5.1 Schedule 15 Filed: 2011 Oct 3 Page 2 of 6

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

(vii) The rates charged for each type of NDA

2 g) Provide a list of all wireless attachments that are used in conjunction with electricity 3 distribution such as SCADA antennas or other SCADA equipment, and, for each such 4 attachment, describe: 5 (i) The geographic location of each wireless attachment 6 (ii) The specific type of wireless attachment

7 (iii)The owner of each wireless attachment

8 (iv)The size, weight, dimensions and other physical specifications of each

9 wireless attachment 10 (v) The attachment location on the pole of each wireless attachment (distribution I I space, communication space, unusable space, etc.) 12 (vi)The attachment method (e.g. through bolt, metal band, in-line (i.e. on-cable,

13 etc.)

14 h) Does THESL publish standard terms and conditions pertaining to non-communication

15 attachments?

1 6 1) Provide a pro forma copy of one attachment agreement in respect of non- 17 c ommunication attachments. 18 j) Provide a copy of THESL's policies governing the attachment of non-communication

19 equipment.

20 k) Provide a copy of THESL's construction guidelines pertaining to non-communication

21 attachments. 1) Provide a copy of the pro forma permit application pertaining to non-communication

23 equipment.

30

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Reponses Tab 5.1 Schedule 15 Filed: 2011 Oct 3 Page 3 of 6

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

m) Is any wireless equipment, including equipment associated with wireless attachments,

2 currently attached outside the communications space on any THESL pole? If "yes",

3 provide:

4 (i) The geographic location of each such wireless attachment

5 (ii) The specific type of such wireless attachment

6 (iii)The owner of each such wireless attachment

7 (iv)The size, weight, dimensions and other physical specifications of each such

8 wireless attachment

9 (v) The attachment location on the pole of each such wireless attachment (distribution 10 space, communication space, unusable space, etc.) 11 )The attachment method (e.g. through bolt, metal band, in-line (i.e. on-cable, etc.)

12

13 RESPONSE:

14 a) NDAs on THESL Poles may limit pole climbing and bucket mobility, and can make 15 work such as stringing conductors more difficult and time consuming for THESL.

16 When performing work such as pole replacements or removals, attachments are an 17 additional project dependency in the project planning and execution, and can delay

18 this work.

19

20 b) During their apprentice and other training, as well as on-going work, THESL staff are 21 taught how to work around NDAs on poles. Please see also the response in Tab 5.1,

22 Schedule 5, part (b).

23

24 c) All attachments (whether or not communications attachments) create an encumbrance 25 on THESL Poles that THESL crews must navigate around. 31

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Reponses Tab 5.1 Schedule 15 Filed: 2011 Oct 3 Page 4 of 6

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

d) THESL does not consider CCTV NDAs to be communications NDAs.

3 e) CANDAS has not defined what an ILEC or CLEC is, which is required in order for

4 THESL to answer this question. THESL believes that this refers to splices that are

5 made in-line (i.e. along the wireline), and are not installed on the pole, and therefore

6 THESL does not consider these to be NDAs.

7

8 0 Please see also the response in Tab 5.1, Schedule 7. THESL does not have records

9 that capture the geographic location of each NDA, the specific type of NDA 10 attachment, the size, weight, dimensions and other physical specification of each

I I NDA (other than as detailed in THESL's standards, attached as Exhibit "A" to 12 CANDAS Byrne IR 1), the attachment location of each NDA on the pole, nor the

13 attachment method. THESL is in the process of gathering such data in the ordinaiy 14 course, but due to the time-consuming nature of the project, it is not possible to have 15 this data available for the purposes of the present proceeding.

16 17 Regarding (iii), the specific owner name of NDAs is not relevant to this proceeding, 18 and in any event confidential. The non-wireline attachments, by type, are as follows:

19 TYPE TOTAL NUMBER transit shelters 297 DAScom 105 wireless antennae 32

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Reponses Tab 5.1 Schedule 15 Filed: 2011 Oct 3 Page 5 of 6

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

rectifier 170 transit 443 equipment baskets, 1968 banners, lighting traffic signs and No Data signals, police cameras

Regarding (vii), the rate applied to telecommunications attachments on THESL primary

3 distribution poles is $22.35. Others are not relevant to this proceeding, and in any event,

4 confidential.

5 6 g )

7 Refer to the two lists:

8 - SCADA equipment, attached as Attachment 1

9 - Radio equipment, attached as Attachment 2

10

ii h) Yes. See THESL Standards Section 23. Standards 23-1100 through 2500 provide

12 information for how temporary and decorative attachments are made.

13

14 i) DAScom is a current THESL customer and has numerous examples of attachment

15 agreements within its possession. 33

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Reponses Tab 5.1 Schedule 15 Filed: 2011 Oct 3 Page 6 of 6

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

j) See THESL Standards Section 23. Standards 23-100 through 2500 give the

2 information for how temporary and decorative attachments are made. Standards 23-

3 3500 and 3900 show the installation for traffic sensors and Enbridge rectifier power

4 supplies, respectively. THESL does not have any further written policies.

5

6 k) See answer to (j) above.

7

8 1) DAScom is a current THESL customer and has numerous examples of permit

9 applications within its possession.

10

11 m) Yes. Please see the reponses in Tab 1, Schedules 19 and 20. See also see the

12 response in Tab 5.1, Schedule 11, part (d), as well as (f) above. Please see CANDAS

13 Evidence Larson for the specifications and placement of DAScom equipment.

14

15

16

17

18 Toronto Hydro-Electrk inited cn-2011-0120 Interrogatories Responses Tab 5.1 Schedule 15 Attachment 1 Page 1 of 3

Toronto Hydro IT&S Radio Systems Base Station & Remote Inventory

. - . :- . 5 • . ci- - ‘ ,. ..!.„.r. .:..1 "7" , "'IZ-.".-"4-:-T'r - --..-, . ' • : ' ,-,.. t ""r•- ",--,-"--'`,"' --,7-, 7,77-.' SOO MHaelotordiSmartnet,;TrunIticl!Simultasf- .. Voice•Rdid•System Base Station Site Number Base Station Name & Sector Location Latitude (dd.dddd) Longitude (-dd.dddd) Licensed Frequency (YIN) Installation Structure Leased Structure MN) 1 Forest 6 Forest La neway 43.762281 79.408914 `I High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y 2 Eglinton 3434 Eglinton Avenue EAST 43344726 79.211932 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y 3 Logan 444 Logan Avenue 43.6653767 79.344634 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y 4 Weston 3077 Weston Road 43.732261 79.537081 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y 5 Neilson 1095 Neilson Road 43.8061123 79.2181246 r High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium r 6 Islington 1300 Islington Avenue 43.6492775 79.5254649 V High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y A Toronto Western Hospital (Receive Only) 399 Bathurst Street 43 652997 79.4062077 Y High-Rise/Hospital Y B Fenelon (Receive only) 135 Fenelon Avenue 43.7628204 79.3386296 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y C Duplex (Receive Only) 500 Duplex Avenue 43.709756 79.401478 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium r

.,,,-:-_,--„,, -. •-,,,... ' 00 MHz Motorola•Micor/PURC'. _ -"-Cohfified!SOace. .:_... ... , . -:Voicti RadiO.50(difil- Base Station Site Identifier Base Station Name Location Latitude (dd.dddd) Longitude (-cfcl.dddd) L censed Frequency (V/M Installation Structure Leased Structure (Y/N) 1 ManuLife 44 Charles Street WEST 43.6682961 79.3884279 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y 2 St Clair 40 St. Clair Avenue WEST 43.6879274 79.3956344 Y High-Rise/Apartment/CondomiMurn `I 3 Erskine 55 Erskine Avenue 43.7115531 79.3968532 `I High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y 4 C.N. Tower 301 Front Street WEST 43.6416076 79.3868205 Y High-Rise/CN Tower Y s Oak,mod 161 Oakwood Avenue 43.6802561 79.4357398 r High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium r 6 Parkdale 45 Oakmount Road 43.6552459 79.4627364 V High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y 7 Logan 444 Logan Avenue 43.6653767 79.344634 V High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium r 8 Kingston 1080 Kingston Road 43.6810078 79.2828588 V High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y 9 Bloor West 2 Jane Street 43.6493636 79.4844892 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium `I 10 Runnyrnede 61 Pelham Park Gardens 43.6687092 79.4580811 r High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium r 11 Dufferin 245 Dunn Avenue 43.6410162 79 .4344471 r High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y 12 Jarvis 96 Gerrard Street EAST 43.6602761 793772563 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y 13 Bathurst 2500 Bathurst Street 43.7055457 79.4264672 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y 14 Danforth 740 Pape Avenue 43.6800803 79.3456154 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y 15 Bloor North 730 Dovercourt Road 43.6602678 79.4290569 r High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium `I 16 Toronto Western Hospital 399 Bathurst Street 43.652997 79.4062077 r High-Rise/Hospital V 17 Coxwell 300 Coxwell Avenue 43.6738931 79.3198169 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y 18 Control 5800 Yonge Street 43.7847676 79.4168176 V Toronto Hydro Work Centre N 19 60 Eglinton 60 Eglinton WEST 43.7059648 794017339 `I Toronto Hydro Work Centre N

,.. _ • , MHz' E-MDSTransir=S- A--_-. :zfla Kr- ysterp: - ,--;._, A5,-:. • Base Station Site Number Base Sta ion Name Location Latitude (dd.dddd) Longitude (-dd.dddd) Licensed Frequency (Y/N) Installation Structure Lea ed Structure (`ON) 1 Forest 6 Forest La neway 43.762281 79.408914 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y 2 Eglinton 3434 Eglinton Avenue EAST 43.744726 79.211932 High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium r 3 Logan 444 Logan Avenue 43.6653767 79.344634 V`I High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y 4 Weston 3077 Weston Road 43732261 79.537081 I' High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y 5 Neilson 1095 Neilson Road 43.8061123 79.2181246 r High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium V 6 Islington 1300 Islington Avenue 43.6492775 79.5254649 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y Subscriber Identifier (Name) Base Station Name & Sector Location Latitude (dd.dddd) Longitude (-dd.dddd) Licensed Frequency (Y/N) Installation Structure Leased Structure NM TRANSIT REMOTE SUBSCRIBER (RADIO) DETAILS CAPTURED IN SCADA ENGINEERING'S DOCUMENT TITLED, "Radio antenna.xlse (re: Comm. Type =Transit)

•-25F-7," ii4.111FR.; 71C- - ftlft",

Page 1 of 6

Toronto Hydro-Electric Med Lis-2011-0120 Interrogatories Responses Tab 5.1 Schedule 15 Attachment 1 Page 2 of 3

. ....7Y....ie;,7 -...--",w."4.E 1 ,.1-2 - Base Station Site Number Base Station Name Location Latitude (dd.ddddl Longitude (-dd.dddd) Licensed Frequency [SIN) Installation Structure Leased Structure DIM 1 Monogram Hub Site (Formerly Belfield) 6 Monogram Place (Formerly Belfield) 43.7047391 79 5513376 r Toronto Hydro Work Centre N 2 Dixon (Master Station) 330 Dixon Road 43.6956814 79.5530882 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium V Subscriber Identifier (Name) Base Station Name & Sector Location Latitude (dd.clddd) Longitude (-dd.dddcl) Licensed Frequency (Y/N) Installation Structure Leased Structure (VN) DARCOM REMOTE SUBSCRIBER (RADIO) DETAILS CAPTURED IN SCADA ENGINEERING'S DOCUMENT TITLED, "Radio antenna.xisx" (re: Comm. Type = DARCOM)

.,.. - 1.7.7 - 7, tri7eY, •---.' r,t. i- .. ... ,. :-. MHz Mototola DPCSCAN/M7R2 4;41r...S A4- id: s . . - _ -.- Base Station Site Number Base Station Name Location Lati ude (dd.dcidd) Longitude (-dd.dddd) licensed Frequency [Y/N) Installation Structure Leased Struc ure (Y/N1 Forest 6 Forest Laneway 43.762281 79.408914 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y Subscriber Identifier (Name) Base Station Name & Sector Location Latitude (dd.dddd) Longitude (-dd.dddd) Licensed Frequency PUN) Installation Structure Leased Structure PUN( DACSCAN REMOTE SUBSCRIBER (RADIO) DETAILS CAPTURED IN SCADA ENGINEERING'S DOCUMENT TITLED, "Radio antenna.xlsx" (re: Comm. Type = NY radio)

. v.,- .,=.--,--...-7-.--,---:-....r. . 00 MHz GE-Mii.S Sib -,..5e..ADA - Da6 Ridico-System• ...... . .

Base Station Site Number Base Station Name Location Latitude (dd.dddd) Longitude (-dd clddd) Licensed Frequency (Y/N) In tallation Structure Leased Structure (WM 1 Forest 6 Forest Larieway 43.762281 79.408914 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium r 2 Eglinton 3434 Eglinton Avenue EAST 43.744726 79.211932 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condorninium r 3 Logan 444 Logan Avenue 43.6653767 79.344634 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium V 4 Weston 3077 Weston Road 43.732261 79.537081 r High-R ise/Apartment/Condorninium Y 5 Neilson 1095 Neilson Road 43.8061123 79.2181246 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y 6 Islington 1300 Islington Avenue 43.6492775 79 5254649 `I High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y Subscriber Identifier (Name) Base Station Name & Sector Location Latitude (dd.dddd) Longitude (-dcl dddd) Licensed Frequency (Y/N) Installation Structure Leased Structure (`ON) SD9 REMOTE SUBSCRIBERS (RADIOS) HANVE NOT YET BEEN DEPLOYED

g Ghz bragonwave Hcitizon CoqvicePacket Microwave Sysfem

Base Stat on Site Number Base Station Name location Latitude (dd.dddd) Longitude (-dd.dddd) Licensed Frequency (Y/N] Installation Structure leased S ructure (Y/N) 1 Forest 4 Forest Laneway 43.7627254 79.4095117 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y 2 Forest 6 Forest Laneway 43.762281 79.408914 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y 3 Duplex 500 Duplex Avenue 43.709756 79.401478 y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y 4 Islington 1300 Islington Avenue 43.6492775 79,5254649 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y 5 Weston 3077 Weston Road 43,732261 79.537081 r High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y

It001v1HiRedliriliedMAXiWiMAX,WireleSs1304aand-tietviptijfiL_. ..q.::=::.

Base Station Site Identifier Base Station Name & Sector Location Lati ude (dd.dddd) Longitude (-dd dddd) Licensed Frequency (y/ ') Installation Structure Leased Structure [Y/N) BS201 Forest EX-200 Sector 1 6 Forest Laneway 43.762281 79.408914 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y 85201 Forest EX-200 Sector 2 6 Forest Laneway 43.762281 79.408914 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y 131200 Forest E5-200 Sector 3 4 Forest Laneway 43.762642 79.409822 r High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y I3S203 Weston EX-200 Sector 1 3077 Weston Road 43.732261 79.537081 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium V 135203 Weston EX-200 Sector 2 3077 Weston Road 43.732261 79.537081 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y 135202 Duplex EX-200 Sector 1 SOO Duplex Avenue 43.709756 79.401478 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y 81202 Duplex EX-200 Sector 2 500 Duplex Avenue 43.709756 79.401478 r High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium V 85202 Duplex EX-200 Sector 3 500 Duplex Avenue 43_709756 79.401478 Y High-Rise/Apartment/Condominium Y Subscriber Identifier (Name) Base Station Name & Sector Location Latitude (dd.dddd) Longitude (-dd.dddd) Licensed Frequency (Y/N) Installation Structure Leased Structure NM CPE-1-8d Forest EX-200 Sector 1 300 Dudley Ave & Church Ave 43,764801 79.372892 Y Hydro Utility Pole N CPE-1-4 Forest EX-200 Sector 2 Woodsworth Rd & Hopperton Dr 43.762275 79.474958 Y Hydro Utility Pole N CPE-1-5c Forest E0-200 Sector 3 555 Sheppard Ave W, East of Bathurst St 43.778366 79,397389 Y Hydro Utility Pole N CPE.3-10 Duplex 01-200 Sector 1 Wilson Ave & Belgrave Ave 43.740877 79.41825 Y Hydro Utility Pole N CPE-3-11 Duplex EX-200 Sector 1 Lawrence Ave & Elm Rd 43 72261 79.411991 V Hydro Utility Pole N CPE-3-5a Duplex EX-200 Sector 2 Glenvale Blvd, East of Bayview Ave 43.691393 79 433043 Y Hydro Utility Pole N CPE-3-5d Duplex 01-200 Sector 2 Cornrnercial Rd, East of Laird Dr 43.704934 79.353373 Y Hydro Utility Pole

Page 2 of 5 Toronto Hydro-Electm to-2011-0120 Interrogatories Responses Tab 5.1 Schedule 15 Attachment 1 Page 3 of 3

CPE-3-7 Duplex EX-200 Sector 3 52 Blossomfield Dove 43.718038 79 449031 Y Hydro Utility Pole N CPE-3-12c Duplex EX-200 Sector 3 100 Forest Hill Road, North of Lonsdale Rd 43311222 79.449343 r Hydro Utility Pole N CPE-2-1 Weston EX-200 Sector 1 3637 Weston Rd, North of Fenrnar Or 43.723137 79.307411 r Hydro Utility Pole N CPE-2-2 Weston EX-200 Sector 2 Huxley Rd and Clayson Rd 43.723957 79.525661 r Hydro Utility Pole N

Page 3 of 6

37

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited 68-2011-0120 Interrogatories Responses Tab 5.1 Schedule 15 Attachment 2 Comm . Page 1 Of 11 Area RTU name Address Type Radio ID TRxTUfreTqyp. e Type Voltage Feld Fdr2 GPS GPS MSL

1 - Transit Master radi 444 Logan Ave 928.81875 Rx treg 928.81875 Scar_EY EY_0SC10238 Pole 266 Donlands Ave 1-Transit 1 DART 195 OH Switch 27.6 KV 34513 Scar_EY EY_OSC41917 Pole 746 O'Connor Dr 1-Transit 2 DART 3 95 OH SWIch 27 6 KV 3454 34M3 Scar_EY EY_0SC24910 Pole 760 O'Connor Dr 1-Transit 3 DART 3.95 01-1 Switch 27 6 KV 5357 3453 Scar_EY EY_0SC17088 Pole 499 Samrnon Ave 1-Transit 4 DART 3 95 OH Switch 27.6 KV 3458 3454 Scar_EY EY_0SC40052 Pole 210 Dawes Rd 1-Transit 5 DART 3 95 OH Switch 27 6 KV 43532 Scar_EY EY_0SC33856 Pole 74 Don Valley Dr 1-Transil 6 DART 3 95 OH Switch 27.6 KV Tor TO_OSC69036 Pole 49 Eglinton Ave W 1-Transit 7 SEC 5801 OH SvAtch 13.8 KV 4A20334:0 31 D2X 42200X 43° 42 304' N 79° 24 34' W 243 Scar_EY EY_OSC31022 Pole 1092 Victoria Park Ave 1-Transit 8 DART 195 OH Switch 27_6 KV 5357 Scar_EY EY_O5C15961 Pole 78 O'Connor Dr 1-Transit 9 DART 3_95 OH Swdch 27.6 KV 3454 3458 Scar_EY EY_05C26788 Pole 1108 O'Connor Dr 1-Transit 10 DART 3 95 OH Snatch 27 6 KV 5357 Scar_EY ET_OSC38300 Pole 33 Gamble Ave 1-Transt 11 DART 3 95 OH Switch 27.6 KV 3451 34524 Scar_EY EY_05C26589 Pole 1025 O'Connor Dr 1-Transit 12 DART a 95 OH Switch 27.6 KV 5357 Scar_EY EY_0SC21136 Pole 6A Curity Ave 1-Transit 13 DART 3.95 OH Switch 27.6 KV Scar_EY EY_OSC39821 Pole 382 Tower Line 1-Transit 14 DART 3.95 OH Switch 27 6 KV 4533:372 Tor EY_L5281 Pole 55 Moore Ave 1-Transil 15 DART 3 95 OH Switch 13 8 KV 435431MM2 L33 4r 41.8' N 79' 22 294' W 135 908 Tm EY_L5280 Pole 61 Moore Ave 1-Transit 16 DART 3 95 OH Switch 13 8 KV 412L 4 3 41 818' N 79° 22 183' W 135 264 Scar_ EY EY_0SC2056 Pole 8 Dohme Ave 1-Transit 17 DART 3 95 OH Switch 27.6 KV 5353 5357 Tor EY_05 C6672 Pole 266 Rurnsey Rd 1-Transit 18 DART 3 95 OH Switch 13.8 KV 413L 43' 42 736' N 79' 22.18' W 135 948 Tor EY_OSC70113 Pole 1803 Bapiew Ave 1-Transit 19 DART 3 95 OH Switch 13.8 KV 413L 43° 42 726' N 79" 22.645' W 149 9618 Tor EY_LS295 Pole 226 Millwood Rd 1-Transit 20 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV 412L 413L 43° 42 157' N 79` 21.726' W 145 Tor EY_OSC84999 Pole 433 Baywew Ave 1-Transil 21 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13.8 KV 412L 413L 4Y 42 244' N 79° 22 464' W 1428512 Scar_EY EY_O5C23677 Pole 5 Hollinger Rd 1-Transit 22 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV Scar SC_OSC49275 Pole 18 Wynnview Crt 1-Transit 23 DART 3.95 OH Switch 27 6 KV 4533M5 234 43' 41 92' N 79° 15.236' W 109 9616 Scar SC_O5C65211 Pole 3150 St Clair Ave E 1-Transit 24 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 5357 443M12783E2 43,709101 79 295066 139 Scar SC_OSC8515 Pole 10-121 Kingston Rd, PO Fallint 1-Transit 25 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 43523 43. 39.875' N 79° 2_68 W 14 Tel TO_OSC95982 Pole 355 Queen St W 1-Transit 26 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV 4240T 4230T -79 43283 100 Tor TO_OSC171327 Pole 187 Russell Hill Rd 1-Transit 29 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13.8 KV A20000 4 31 760421 8274' N 79.41521' W 176 Tor TO_05 C18230 Pole 125 Oriole Pkwy 1-Transit 30 SEC 5801 OH Swttch 13 8 KV 420013X 43 70500° N 79 40595° W 180 Tor TO_0SC14061 Pole 123 Oriole Pkwy 1-Transt 31 SEC 5801 OH Swdch 13 8 KV 425005 43 70472° N 79 40588' W 180 Tor 70_05C36607 Pole 56 Chaplin Gres 1-Transit 33 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13.8 KV 4200011 4250DX 43 69872° N 79 40555° W 184 Tor TO_0SC18657 Pole 42 ChapIrn Gres 1-Transit 34 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV 42200X 4250DX 43 69796' INI 79 40282° W 181 Tor TO_OSC51634 Pole 43 Huron St 1-Transit 36 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13.8 KV 42320 43 6755° N 79 40522° W 126 Tor S5274 Pole 243 Eastern Ave 1-Transit 37 DART OH Switch 13 8 KV 4251BN 43° 39.677' N 78 19 781' VV 96 Tor T0_05063659 Pole 14 Weds St 1-Transit 38 SEC 5801 OH Switch 1313 KV 425206 4231B 43 67078°N 79 41019° W 125 Tor TO_OSC84783 Pole 100 Dupont St 1-Transit 39 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV 425209 4232B 43.6738T N 79 41139° W 167 Tor T0_05C14270 Pole 357 Bathurst St 1-Transit 40 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13.8 KV 425205 43 67120° N 79.41340° W 122 Tor TO_OSC81233 Pole 39 Folks Ave 1-Transit 41 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV 4252DN 43.66832° N 79 41895° W 102 Tor T0_05 C76732 Pole 63 Madison Ave 1-Transit 42 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV 42318 43 67494° N 79 40579° W 110 Tor TO_OSC57083 Pole 170 Dupont SI 1-Transit 43 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV 54255314 2DH 42520N 43 67181°N 79 42110° W 117 Scar SC_OSC66373 Pole 1413 Victoria Park Ave 1-Transit 44 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV E5M6 43 720327° N 79 300746° W 16 Tor TO_05C88292 Pole 367 Queen St W 1-Transit 45 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13_8 KV 4225T 43 6130' N 79 4959Y W 120 Scar_EY SC_0SC15346 Pole 3834 Haldon Ave 1-Transit 46 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 43531 43532 43.6997 ° N 79 3125° W 116 Tor S8224 Pole 52 Greenwood Ave 1-Transit 101 DART 3 95 OH Switch 13 8 KV 448E 79' 19 243' N 79' 19 681' W 86 2584 Tor S8225 Pole 50 Greenwood Ave 1-Transit 102 DART 3 95 OH Switch 13 8 KV 421E 79' 19.218' N 79° 19 669' W 85 392 Tor S8234 Pole 50 Greenwood Ave 1-Transit 103 DART 3 95 OH Switch 13 8 KV 448E 79° 19 248' N 79° 19 689' W 86 5632 Tor 58236 Pole 95 Coxwell Ave 1-Transil 104 DART 3.95 OH Switch 13.8 KV A2E 43° 4 43' N 79° 19 151' W 88 392 Tor TO_SEI015 Pole 87 Parliament St 1-Transit 105 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13 El KV 425GD 43° 39_344' N 79' 21.878' W 37 Tor TO_O5 C28709 Pole 34 Basin St 1-Transit 106 SEC 5801 01-1 Switch 13 8 KV 425195 43° 38.993' N 79° 2 327' W 88 Tor TO_0SC36939 Pole 76 Commissioners St 1-Transit 107 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV 423B74 43° 39 27 - N 79° 2 45' W 93 Scar SC_OSC19677 Pole 1359 Woodbine Ave 1-Transit 108 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 43531 3454 43 69678. N 79 317487° W 126 Tor TO_OSC71749 Pole 36 Basin St 1-Transit 109 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV 4230N 43° 38.994' N 79' 2_318 W 88 Tor TO_OSC39227 Pole 43 Coxwell Ave 1-Transit 111 SEC 5E101 OH Switch 13.8 KV 4201E 436669° N 79 31671° W 79 Tor TO_0SC77522 Pole 41 Coxwell Ave 1-Transd 112 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13.8 KV 42028N 4201E 43 6668° N 79 31661° lN 79 Tx tree: 2 - Transit Master 1300 Islington Ave 932 04375 Rx free 932 04375 Pole 63 HONI ROW. Rear 61 EH_OSC28943 Etob W ill owridge 2-(P2)Tran 58 MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 88515 Blob EH_TST2 Moscad Test RTU in Islington 2-(P2)Tran 100 MOSCAD Test RTtJ Etch EH_SINC 17 Sinclair SI 2-(P2)Tran 101 MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob EH_ISLI 79 Cordova Ave 24P2)Tran 102 MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Elob EN_MONO 6 Mongram (lest) 2-(P2)Tran 103 MOSCAD TEST 27 6 KV Etob EH_OSC350 Pole 3 Park Lawn Rd 2-(P2)Tran 104 MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 3058 Etob EN_MILL 119 Mill Rd 2-(P2)Tran 105 MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Blob EH_REID 54 Reid Manor 2-11.2)Tran 106 MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Elob EH_BERR 132 Berry Rd 2-(P2)Tran 107 MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob EH_O5C51012 Pole 1514Kipling Ave 2-Transit 1 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 88513 88516 43'48'N 79" 33 137' W 185 Elob EH_OSC35818 Pole 3991 Eglinton Ave W 2-Transil 2 DART 3.95 OH Switch 27_6 KV 88518 1157 43. 41 32' N 79° 1656' W 116 Etob EH_0508528 Pole 3190 Lakeshore Blvd 2-Transit 3 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV R3-MS R3-51 43 35.86' N 79° 31 182' W 91 Elob El-1_0507256 Pole 411 Evans Ave 2-Transit 4 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV R3-M3 43' 36 89414 79' 31 85' W 58 Elob_YK YK_0SC6216 Pole 31 Todd Baylis Blvd 2-Transtl 5 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27_6 KV 1154 3551 43° 41 689' N 79' 29 262 W 111 Etob EH_OSC66267 Pole 1447 Islington Ave 2-Transit 6 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 881413 38516 43' 39.541' N 79' 31 775 W 15 Elob_YK YK_O0C5257 Pole 2199 Keele St 2-Transit 7 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 31 5114561 3, 5,14-1428 43° 41 864' N 79° 28.518' W 166 Etob_YK YK_05C5334 Pole 5 East Dr 2-Transit 8 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 43' 4 722' 14 79' 2885' W 125 Elob_YE YK_OSC3735 Pole 12 Blcknell Ave 2-Transit 9 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 1158 43° 4 96Y NI 79' 2E451' 49 135 Etob_YK YK_OSC5789 Pole 19 Scarlet( Rd 2-Transit 10 SEC 5801 CH Switch 27 6 KV 11145 1157 4Y 39 98411 79° 29.948 W 122 Elob_YE YK_0SC863 Pole 187 Wright Ave 2-Transit 11 SSC 5801 CH Smtch 27.6 KV 1152 88518 43° 42.8' N 79° 3 351' W 154 Etob_YK YK_OSC829 Pole 296 Weston Rd 2-Transrl 12 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 1152 88518 43` 41 789' N 7V a 534' W 7 Etob_YE YK_OSC5839 Pole 113 Hickery Tree Rd 2-Transit 13 580 5801 01-I Switch 27.6 KV 88518 43' 41 925' N 79' 31 87' W 18 Elob_YE YK_OSC9619 Pole 7 Hurnber Blvd S 2-Transit 14 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 1 1 15421 1158 43° 4 94' N 79° 28 832' W 12 Etob_YK YK_OSC1563 Pole 1525-4 Jane St 2-Transit 15 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 1153 43. 41 686' N 79' 31 148 W 118 Etob_YE 5 K_OSC4528 Pole 212 Scarlet Rd 2-Transit 16 SEC 5801 01-I Switch 27.8 KV 1157 43° 4 578' N 79° 3 362' W 19 Etob_YK YK_O 0 C50245 Pole 238 Bicknell Ave 2-Transit 17 SEC 6801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 1158 3551 Etob_YE YK_0SC3534 Pole 1246 Weston Rd 2-Transit 18 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV ,1 ,1 445 21 43' 41.33' N 79' 29 611'W 145 Blob_ YK YK OSC4182 Pole 165 Rockclifl Blvd 2-Transit 19 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 43' 4 68 N 79' 29 378 W 14 Emb_YE YK_OSC2782 Pole 450 St Johns Rd 2-Transit 20 SSC 5801 01-I Switch 27 6 KV 1155 43° 39.747' N 79' 29 27T W 134 Etob_YE YK_OSC6276 Pole 55 Emmett Ave 2-Transit 21 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 1153 43' 41.344' N 79- 3.224' W 128 Elob_YK YK_0SC453 Pole 17 Cobalt St 2-Transit 22 SEC 5801 01-15witch 27 6 KV 1153 3551 03' 41 537' N 79' 29 99' W 137 Etob_YE YK_OSC25363 Pole 617 McRoberts Ave 2-Transit 23 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 3552 43° 01 543' N 79' 27.63' W 16 NY NY_O5C2319 Pole 2696 Keele St 2-Transit 24 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 1815145825 43.72414° N 79 48199° W 148 in Etob_YE YK_OSC19399 Pole 134 Kitchener Ave 2-Transit 25 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 3552 43' 41.417' N 79 27 589' W 157 38

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited 88-2011-0120 Interrogatories Responses Tab 5.1 Schedule 15 Elob_YK YK_0SC7171 Pole 8 Woodborough Ave 2-Transit 26 SAC 5801 OH Switch 276 KV 43' 41 715 N 79' 28.75W 131 Attzthment 2 Elats_YK YK_05C88012 Pole 1774 Eglinton Ave W 2-Transit 27 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 3355M21M 35M1 43' 41.768 N 79' 26118' W 175 Page a ot 11 Etob_YK YK_0SC70554 Pole 1001 Castlefield Ave 2-Transit 28 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 43' 41.871' N 79° 27 953' W 159 Elob_YK YK_0SC8250 Pole 116 Rogers Rd 2-Transit 29 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 31 5M1M 81 35M1 43' 41.98' N 7 V 26931' W 155 Elob_YK YK_0SC49573 Pole 120 Bowie Ave 2-Transit 30 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 35M2 43° 41.779' N 79° 27 454' W 177 Elob_YK YK_0SC25445 Pole 58 Northchtf Blvd 2-Transit 31 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 35M1 43 ° 41 173' N 79° 26.638' W 156 Elob_YK Y1K_OSC20083 Pole 356 Vaughan Rd 2-Transit 32 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 35M9 43° 41 325' N 79" 25 84' W 18 Etob_YK YK_05C36717 Pole 2 Belvidere Ave 2-Transit 33 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 35M9 35144 43° 41621' N 79' 2621 W 54 Etob_YK YK_0SC81789 Pole 260 Vaughan Rd 2-Transit 34 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 35M9 35M1 43° 41.31'N 79' 25 546' W 13 Etob_YK YK_0SC51433 Pole 700 Winona Ave 2-Transit 35 SIC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 35M4 43° 41.837' N 79 26.314' W 166 Etob_YK YK_0SC80842 Pole 162 Alarneda Ave 2-Transit 36 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 35M9 43' 41.819' N 79' 26.396 W 181 Elob_YK YK_0SC31786 Pole 7 Glenhurst Ave 2-Transil 37 SAC 5801 OH SvAtch 27 6 KV 35M1 43° 4.931'N 79' 26 111' W 137 Tor 10_58263 Pole 62 Campbell Ave 2-Transit 38 DART 3 95 OH Switch 13 8 KV A530N A271DN 43' 39 879' N 79' 26.974' W 145 Elob_YK YK_05C724 Pole 235 South Kingsway 2-Transit 39 &BC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 11MS 381429 Etob EH_0SC7699 Pole 39 Willowndge Rd 2-Transit 40 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 88M11 43' 4561' N 79' 34 123' W 154 Etob EH_0SC55255 Pole 65 Vulcan St 2-Transit 41 SAC 5801 OH Switch 276 KV 88M43 881414 43° 42.218' N 79' 35 15' W 164 Elob EFL0SC2489 Pole 40 New Toronto St 2-Transit 42 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV R3-M4 Elob_YK YK_0SC53886 Pole 152 Caledonia Rd (3525) 2-Transit 43 DART OH Switch 27.6 KV 35M1 43' 42 1' N 79° 27 834' W Etob_YK YK_0SC3317 Pole 3600 Dundas St W 2-Transit 44 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 11M7 34M811145 Etob EH_0SC7003 Pole 45 The West Mall 2-Transit 45 DART OH Switch 276 KV 88M15 Etob EH_0SC713058 Pole 604-1 Dixon Rd 2-Transit 46 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 88M3 Tor T0_55984 Pole 2 Vine Ave 2-Transit 47 58C 5801 OH Switch 13 B KV A273DN 43' 39 996' N 79' 27 935' W 147 Etob EH_0SC75064 Pole 30 Ronson Dr 2-Transit 48 SAC 5801 OH Switch 276 KV 88-M16 Tor TO_0SC38218 Pole 113 Sterling Rd 2-Transit 49 SAC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV A2510N 43' 39 195' N 79° 26 656 W 98 Tor TO_0SC74055 Pole 376 Sorauren Ave 2-Transit 50 SAC 5801 OH Switch 13.8 KV A251DN A251DN 43 ° 39 66' N 79 ° 26124' W 15 Tor TO_05C52803 Pole 107A Clendenan Ave 2-Transit 51 SAC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV 43° 39921' N 79° 28 411' W 94 Etob_YK Y1K_0SC92448 Pole 29 Gilpin Ave 2-Transit 52 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV A112M738°N 43° 4 96' N 79° 28 399' W 119 Elob_YK YK_OSC4662 Pole 175 Rogers Rd 2-Transit 53 SSC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 43° 4 992' N 79' 27 .79' W 125 Etob_YK YK_0SC73333 Pole 45 Dunraven Dr 2-Transit 54 SEX 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 1 1I M13M8 43° 41 8' N 79' 28 163' W 115 Tor TO_05C7565 Pole 2 Noble St 2-Transit 55 68.0 5801 OH Switch 118 KV A2401 43 64214° N 79.42963' W 87 8106 EH_05C22629 Pole 106 Rexdale Blvd 2-Transit 56 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 881412 Etob_YK YK_OSC26809 Pole 2 Keetesdale Dr 2-Transit 59 SaC 5801 OH Simtch 27 6 KV 8,1to21M81 M 1 17 43° 68614' N 79° 48 370' W 108 Etob_YK YK_0SC38866 Pole 4 Symes Rd 2-Transit 60 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 3151MM51 Etob_YK YK_0SC41651 Pole 525 McRoberts Ave 2-Transil 61 SAC 5801 OH Switch 276 KV 11M8 35142 43 41 330' N 79 27 535 W 129 Etob_YK YK_O5C69140 Pole 63 Cayuga Ave 2-Transit 62 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 11M2 11148 Etob EH_0SC498 Pole 280 New Toronto St 2-Transit 63 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 30M4 30146 43' 36.351' N 79° 30.666' W 102 Etob EH_0SC99327 Pole 446 Kipling Ave 2-Transit 60 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 30M3 30M5 43' 36 512' N 79° 31 296' W 112 Etob Elt0SC89569 Pole 285 Aldercrest Rd 2-Transil 65 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 30M3 30M7 43° 36 695 N 79° 32 559' W 119 Etob EH_OSC93977 Pole 3146 Lake Shore Blvd W 2-Transit 66 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 30M9 30M10 Etob EH_0SC55264 Pole 64 Thirtieth St 2-Transit 67 SAC 5801 OH Swtch 27 6 KV 30M5 30M10 Etob EH_0SC58684 Pole 53 Manstor Rd 2-Transil 69 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV WNF2 WNF3 43° 31102' N 79° 33 551' 4V 123 Etob EH_05C82666 Pole 218 Horner Ave 2-Transit 70 SAC 5601 OH Switch 276 KV 30M10 30M2 43° 36 472 N 79° 31 074 W 102 Elob EH_OSC23352 Pole 2324 Lake Shore Blvd W 2-Transil 71 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 30M2 3300h4N147 43' 37 019 N 79° 29 258 W 63 81°6 EH_OSC24075 Pole 37 Soften Ave 2-Transit 74 SAC 5801 01-I Switch 216 KV 38M6 43° 36 601 N 79' 31 886' W 131 Etob EFLOSC75130 Pole 445 Royal York Rd 2-Transit 75 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 30M1 Etob_YK YK_0SC73280 Pole 15651. Marks Rd 2-Transit 76 68.0 5801 OH Switch 216 KV 1111:27 11145 43° 39 573' N 79°29 619 W 108 NY 194_05C36880 Pole 3 Rockchtte 8Ivd 2-Transit 77 SAC 51301 OH Switch 27 6 KV 11M5 43° 40 311 N 79° 29 230 W 117 Tor T0_513199 Pole 9 Annette Ave 2-Transit 78 SAC 5801 OH Switch 13.8 KV A530D19 (NOW A273DN 43° 39 833 N 79' 27 594 W 120 Elob_YK YK_OSC414 Pole 2116 Lawrence Ave W 2-Transit 79 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 13131412 43° 41.956' N 79' 31 211 W 17 Tor TO_0SC54501 Pole 136 Indian Rd 2-Transit 80 SitC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV A257DN 4165492° N 7945697° W 129 Tor TO_00C16487 Pole 118 Roncesvalles Ave 2-Transit 81 SAC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV 42580N 43 65052° N 79.450760° W 120 Tor TO_O0C91407 Pole 36 Geoffrey St 2-Transit 82 SAC 5801 OH Switch 118 KV A258DN A257DN 43 64796° N 79.45026° W 110 Etob_YK YK_0SC61616 Pole 3 Trmes Rd 2-Transit 83 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 35M9 43° 41 841 9 79' 26671' W 176 Etob EH_OSC71901 Pole 198 30th St 2-Transit 84 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 30M10 43° 36 265' N 79° 32 042' W 121 Elob_YK YK_0SC17136 Pole 60 Symes Rd 2-Transit 85 SEC 5801 OH Smitch 27.6 KV 11M8 43° 40 442' N 79° 28 904' W 111 Eta EFL0SC78438 Pole 10 North Queen St 2-Transit 88 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 38M4 43° 37 504' N 79' 31.828' W 129 Elob EH_0SC51418 Pole 737 Kipling Ave 2-Transit 89 SAC 5801 OH Switch 276 KV 38M12 43' 37 610' Al 79' 31 722 W 96 Etob EH_OSC49707 Pole 579 Kipling Ave 2-Transit 90 SSC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 30M1 43° 36918' N 79° 31 435 W 114 Elob EH_0SC34725 Pole 369 Evans Ave 2-Transit 91 SAC 5801 OH Svvitch 27 6 KV 30M3 30M1 43' 36 944' N 79` 31 450 W 104 8106 EH_0SC35254 Pole 651 Kipling Ave 2-Transit 92 SAC 5801 OH Switch 276 KV 38M4 43' 37 283' N 79° 31 609' W 119 Etob EH_PSC29816 115 Tenth SI 2-Transit 93 SAC 5801 PMH-9 256 KV R30M9 43° 36.056' N 79° 30 256' W 83 Etob EH_OSC31511 Pole 4571-28 Eglinton Ave W Rear '2-Transit 94 S8.0 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 88M15 886145 43 67377° N 79 56541' W 152 Etob EI-L0SC71684 Pole 1574 Royal York Rd 2-Transit 95 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 88M18 881412 43 6975° N 79 53347' W 176 Etob_YK YK_O5C43993 Pole 25 Times Rd 2-Transit 96 SSC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 35M9 43 69970' N 79 44544° W 250 Tor TO_OSC96167 Pole 26 Roncesvalles Ave 2-Transit 97 68-C 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV 425130N 43 64148' N 79.44731°W 116 Elob_YK Y1K_0SC36794 Pole IS Rogers Rd 2-Transit 111 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 35M9 43.68604' N 7943950' W 192 Etob_YK YK_OSC15469 Pole 9 McRoberts Ave 2-Transit 112 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 311 5A4M81° 43 68341° N 79 45671' W 142 Elob EH_0SC63034 Pole 271 Birmingham SI 2-Transit 116 SAC 5801 OH Switch 256 KV R3OM5 030146 43 60088° N 79.51769' W 101 Etob EH_05C3723 Pole 432 Homer Ave 2-Transit 118 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV R30M10 43 60348 N 79 53764° W 119 Etob EN_OSC9984 Pole 460 Homer Ave 2-Transt 119 SAC 5801 01-I Switch 256 KV R30M7 R30M10 43 60269' N 79.54128' W 95 Etch Eli_05C21749 Pole 619 Kipling Ave 2-Transit 120 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 38A14 43 62001° N 79 52612° VV 112 Etob EH_0SC74871 Pole 566 Kipling Ave 2-Transit 121 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 3300M3M 43 61530°N 79 52454.W 115 Etob E1-1 05C72640 Pole 2 Diesel Dr 2-Transit 124 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV R30M3 38M27 43 61394° N 79 53500' W 63 Tor TO_0SC49719 Pole 390 King St W 2-Transit 125 SAC 5801 01-I Swilch 13 8 KV A2257 4363681° N 79 43803° W 107 Elob EI-LPSC40934 1204 Carlingview Blvd 2-Transit 126 DART PMH-11 27.6 KV 881444 88M41 43 67654' N 79 59113° W 149 Tx: 3 • Transit Master 1095 Neilson Rd 941.14375 Rr 941.14375 Etob_YK 1K_OSC34332 Pole 62 Syrnes Rd 2-Transil 129 SAC 5901 OH Switch 276 KV 111142 43' 40 4532 N 79° 29 5044' W 149 Scar 5C_0SC14194 Pole 2993 Pharmacy Ave 3-Transit 1 DART 3 95 OH Switch 27.6 KV 50211124 Scar SC_OSC49119 Pole 2187 Warden Ave 3-Transit 2 SAC 5601 OH Switch 27 6 KV 502M22 Scar SC_0SC65977 Pole 3201 Ellesmere Rd 3-Transit 3 DART 01-1 Switch 27 6 KV 47M14 43 785719' N 79 190486° VV 18 Scar SC_0SC10728 Pole 3070 Eninley Rd 3-Transit 4 DART 195 OH Switch 27 6 KV 63M6 H9M25 Scar SC_LIC 1000 Scarborough Golf Club Rd 3-Transil 5 SEL 2032 Substation 4 KV Scar SC_0SC78778 Pole 25 Channel Nine Crt 3-Transit 6 DART 3 95 OH Switch 27 6 KV H9M25 43° 47 22' N 79° 15 389 W 166 Scar SC_0SC55277 Pole 1564 Markham Rd 3-Transil 7 DART 3 95 OH Switch 27 6 KV H9M3 991427 43' 46 69' N 79' 13 718' W Scar SC_OSC64254 Pole 21 Glen Watford Or 3-Transit 8 DART OH Switch 27 6 KV 63M5 Scar SC_0SC89976 Pole 2207 Bnrnely Rd 3-Transit 9 DART OH Switch 27 6 KV 502M32 63M6 Scar SC_OSC38192 Pole 1438 Kennedy Rd 3-Transit 10 DART 3 95 OH Swilch 27.6 KV E5M29 43' 45 891' N 79° 16 867' W Scar SC_0SC59905 Pole 1918 McGowan Rd 3-Transit 11 DART OH Switch 27.6 KV H9M25 63M6 Scar SC_05038623 Pete 4980 Finch Ave E 3-Transit 12 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 63M6 43' 48.472' N 79. 16 83' W Scar SC_OSC46418 Pole 1988 Brimley Rd 3-Transil 13 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV H9M25 E5M24 43° 48 393* 79° 11111' W 174 3456 Scar SC_0SC40834 Pole 2190 Midland Rd 3-Transit 14 DART 3.95 OH Switch 27.6 KV 63M5 E5M26 43' 46.425 N 79° 16 4T W Scar SC_OSC40880 Pole 1933 Kennedy Rd 3-Transit 15 DART 3 95 OH Switch 27 6 KV E5M29 E5M3 43° 4671 N 79' 16 881 W Scar SC_0SC38413 Pole 919 Ellesmere Rd 3-Transit 16 DART 3.95 OH Switch 27 6 KV E5M29 43° 45 953' N 79° 16 818 W Scar SC_OSC20772 Pole 2098 Markham Rd 3-Transit 17 DART OH Switch 27 6 KV 261436 H9M32 39

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatories Responset Tab 5 1 Schedule 15 Scar SC_0SC5742 Pole 852 Markharn Rd 3-Transit 18 DART 01-I Switch 27.6 KV 119M30 H9M27 Attachment 2 Scar SC_0SC3015 Pole 6145 Stenles Ave E 3-Transit 19 SE.0 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 26M23 43'48 393' N 79' 13 111' W SHAME? Page 3 of 11 Scar SC_0SC84468 Pole 5235-B Finch Ave E 3-Transtl 20 DART OH Switch 27 6 KV 63M8 26M32 Scar SC_EJ Pole 1919 Midland Ave 3-Trans/I 21 SEL 2032 Substation 4 KV Scar SC_0SC73460 Pole 2015 Bernley Rd 3-Transit 22 SOC 5801 01-I Switch 27 6 KV H9M25 43° 47 22 N 79° 16 54' W 184 44 Scar SC_OSC84972 Pole 1760 Mar/dram Rd 3-Transit 23 DART OH Switch 27 6 KV 1-19M32 1491423 Scar SC_0SC55748 Pole 5111 Sheppard Ave E 3-Transit 24 DART 3 95 OH Svntch 27 6 KV H9M23 ar 47 619' N 79' 14.366' W Hydro One ROW West El0 TiffieId 25 Scar SCI0SC2938 Rd 3-Trarisit DART 01-I Switch 27 6 KV 63M12 20133 Scar SC_PSC34341 W/S Neilson IWO Tapscott 3-Transil 26 DART PMH-11 27 6 KV 47M3 26M34 43 807842° N 79 219997° W 123 rn Scar SC_05C84659 Pole 5500 Finch Ave E 3-Transit 27 DART OH Scorch 27.6 KV 63M5 26M36 Scar SC_05C3215 Pole 850 Passmore Ave 3-Transit 28 SRC 5801 01-1 Switch 27 6 KV 2611421 43' 49.88' N 79' 14 89' W 173 Scar SC_0SC19912 Pole 3180 Markham Rd 3-Transil 29 DART 395 OH Switch 27 6 KV 26M21 261432 Scar SC_0SC70721 Pole 4145 Sheppard Ave E 3-Transil 30 S8C 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 502M26 63145 43' 47 097' N 79° 16.870' W ? Scar SC_PSC97430 W/S Meadowvale S/0 Kirkharns 3-Transit 31 DART PMH-11 27.6 KV 47M6 471018 43-810567° N 79 172448° W 279 rn Scar SC_05C64242 Pole 1134 Morningside Rd 3-Transit 33 DART 3 95 OH Switch 27 6 KV 47143 47M8 43° 47 925' N 79' 11 929' W Scar SC_OSC68123 Pole 379 Old Finch Ave 3-Transil 34 DART 3 95 OH Swilch 27 6 KV 26M36 471418 43' 49 511 N 79° 11 34' W Scar SC_0SC47289 Pole 5149 Sheppard Ave E 3-Transil 35 DART 395 OH Switch 27.6 KV H9M32 47141 43° 47673' N 79° 14.11 W 16.9344 NY NY_05C40550 Pole 2908 Victoria Park Ave 3-Transit 36 58C 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV SIMI Scar SC_0SC924 9390 Sheppard Ave E, Pole 8945-4 13-Transit 37 DART OH Switch 27 6 KV 47M5 471414 43808073° N 79.176497' W 336' Scar SC_05C93757 9390 Sheppard Ave E, Pole 9388-2 13-Transit 38 DART OH Swilch 27 6 KV 47M6 471413 43 807768' N 79 176095° W 338' Scar SC_OSC45071 Pole 5590 Finch Ave E 3-Transit 39 DART OH Switch 27 6 KV 26M32 261431 Scar SC_0SC58853 Pole 6715 Sheppard Ave E 3-Transit 40 DART 195 OH Switch 27 6 KV 26M21 43' 47 896 N 79° 12 984' W 184,992 Scar SC_0SC64753 Pole 7471 Sheppard Ave E 3-Transil 41 S&C 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 47M3 43' 48 25' N 79° 12 42' W 184 992 Scar SC_OSC33911 Pole 5453 Lawrence Ave E 3-Transit 42 DART OH Switch 27,6 KV 47M13 471417 Scar SC_0SC943 Pole 6776 Kingston Rd 3-Transit 43 DART 3 95 OH Switch 27.6 KV 47M13 47M17 43 798338. N 79 147353 5 W 124 968 Scar SC_0SC92350 Pole 355 Old Finch Ave 3-Transit 44 DART 3.95 OH Switch 27 6 KV 47M18 47M18 43° 49 62' N 79° 1 91' W 145 39 Scar SC_0SC69882 Pole 431 Morningside Ave 3-Transit 45 DART 3_95 OH Switch 27.6 KV 478114 43' 46 862' N 79 11 485 W 14 546 Scar SC_0SC54003 Pole 3850 Ellesmere Rd 3-Transit 48 S8C 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 47M7 47146 Scar SC_0SC75950 Pole 4060 Finch Ave E 3-Transit 49 DART OH Switch 27 6 KV 502M26 63148 Scar SC_0SC9516 Pole 3620 Finch Ave E 3-Transii 50 SOC 5801 OH Swtch 27.6 KV 52M23 63143 Scar SC_0SC22631 Pole 301 TitheId Rd (82 HONI ROW 3-Transit 51 SOC. 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 63M11 26M32 Scar SC_OSC91100 Pole 4040 Finch Ave E 3-Transit 52 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 63M5 Scar SC_0SC61279 Pole 4620 Finch Ave E 3-Transit 53 513,C 5801 OH Svnich 276 KV 63148 Scar SC_0SC83356 Pole 5020 Finch Ave E 3-Transit 54 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 63146 Scar SC_OSC92794 Pole 5177 Finch Ave E 3-Transit 55 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 63M8 43 809430 ° N 79 260048' W 192 Scar SC_0SC44144 Pole 2550 Birchmount Rd 3-Transit 56 SOC 5801 01-1 Switch 27_6 KV 5021429 Scar SC_05C46563 Pole 3546 Sheppard Ave E 3-Transit 57 S&C 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 502M22 5021429 Scar SC_OSC64590 Pole 3760-4 Sheppard Ave E 3-Transit 58 58.0 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 5021429 50211126 Scar SC_OSC20317 Pole 34-133 Kennedy Rd 3-Transit 59 SiSC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 502M26 Scar SC_0SC93304 Pole 5 Milner Ave 3-Transit 60 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 9M25 9M25 Scar SC_0SC30210 Pole 237 Milner Ave 3-Transd 61 SOC 5801 OH SWitCh 27 6 KV 9M26 Scar SC_OSC33180 Pole 69-3 Sleeles Ave E (3 Poles W/ 3-Transit 62 S&C 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 63M12 261432 43° 48.393' N 79° 13 111' W SHAME? Scar SC_OSC97120 Pole 217 Kennedy Rd 3-Transit 63 S6C 5801 01-1 Switch 27 6 KV 502M26 Scar SC_0SC16198 Pole 8 Progress Ave 3-Transit 64 S&C 5E101 OH Switch 27 6 KV E51429 E5M26 Scar SC_OSC15342 Pole 1061 Ellesmere Serv. Rd SE 3-Transit 65 S8C 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 35M29 E5M21 Scar SC_0SC7414 Pole 1329 Ellesmere Rd 3-Transit 66 56C 5801 01-1 Switch 27 6 KV E5M21 Scar SC_OSC47319 Pole 374 Progress Ave 3-Transit 67 DART OH Swdch 27 6 KV 5M26 51424 43° 46 55' N 7915 884' W 1666592 Scar SC_PSC48419 Cor. Sheppard Ave E & Neilson 3-Transit 68 DART PMH-11 27 6 KV 47M1, 47M3 9M24, 26M34 Scar SC_PSC41403 Steeles Ave E @ Silver Star Blvd 3-Transit 69 DART PMH-11 27.6 KV 63M4 Scar SC_PSC32511 N/E cor. Kennedy 6 William Kitchen I 3-Transit 70 DART PMH-11 27.6 KV 51426, 5M29 52M26 Scar SC_0SC41954 Pole 102-751 Sheppard Ave R, W/0 83-Transit 72 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 47141 43° 48 11 N 79' 12 452' W 537 Scar SC_PSC5792 StE Cor N/Leg Barnburgh Cir & Wa 3-Transtt 73 DART PMH-9 27 6 KV 502M21 Scar SC_PSC7260 W/S ot Birchmount Ave, 6/0 Winten 3-Transit 74 DART PMH-9 27.6 KV 502M21 Scar SC_FBT I 2355 Lawrence 8 Kennedy 3-Transit 75 SEL 2032 Substation 4 KV Scar SC_0SC62447 Pole 3390 Kennedy Rd 3-Transil 78 S&C 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 502M23 63M4 Scar SC_OSC23778 Pole 3455 Midland Ave 3-Transd 79 S&C 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 63M4 631146 43' 48 73r N 79' 17 327' W Scar SC_05C26706 Pole 5080 Finch Ave E 3-Transit 80 68,C 5801 OH Swilch 27 6 KV 63M8 63M6 Scar SC_0SC43225 Pole 126 2 Sheppard Ave E 3-Transit 83 SOC 5801 01-ISwilch 27 6 KV 47M16 47M6 Scar SC_0SC90429 Pole 8121 Sheppard Ave E 3-Transit 84 S&C 5801 OH Switch 276 KV 47M3 43 802067' N 79 198804° W 154 Scar SC_0SC15939 Pole 7501 Sheppard Ave E 3-Transit 85 S8,,C 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 47M3 43 800702' N 79 205957' W 187 Scar SC_0SC8616 Pole 6725 Sheppard Ave E 3-Transit 86 58,C 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 47M3 43.798434' N 79 215674° W 124 Scar SC_PSC15603 Old Fmch Morningside 3-Transit 87 DART PMH-11 27 6 KV 47M3 261431 Scar SC_OSC49484 Pole 221-I HONI ROW Neilson/Militi3-Transt 88 S&C 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV H9M23 47M8 43 786912° N 79 206115' W 73 Scar SC_O5C90073 Pole 5891 Sheppard Ave E 3-Transit 89 S8C 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 47141 59M23 43 7974°N 79 2212° W 155 Scar SC_OSC18358 Pole 5595 Steeles Ave E 3-Transil 90 S&C 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 26M21 41832378° N 79 268543' W 229 Scar SC_OSC65945 Pole 4200 Finch Ave E 3-Transit 91 SOC 5801 OH SwItch 27 6 KV 63M5 63M6 436039571 N 79286163° W 163 nt Scar SC_0SC28664 Pole 20 Nuggel Ave 3-Transit 92 SSC 5801 011 Switch 27 6 KV 63M6 H9M23 43.792406' N 79 259613° W 188 Scar SC_0SC74977 Pole 3100 Ellesmere Rd 3-Transil 93 S&C 5801 OH Switch 276 KV H9M22 47M15 43.785590' N 79195017° W 144 4 - Transit Master 3077 Western Rd 932.1437 Re: 932.14375 Elob EH_0SC6870 Pole 2208 Lawrence Ave W 4-Transit 1 DART 195 OH Switch 27 6 KV 881418 450 4 82 N 79' 33 13r W 185 Etob EH_0SC92492 Pole 370 Cadingview Dr 4-Transit 2 S&C 5801 OH Swilch 13 8 KV EHF1 EHF2 4169575° N 79 59966° W 134 NY NY_0SC67983 Pole 18 Norfinch Dr 4-Transit 3 58,C 5801 01-1 Switch 27 6 KV 55M24 55M26 4175587° N 79 52475° W 218 Elob EH_0SC23137 Pole 2 Skyway Ave 8 Dixon 4-Transit 4 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27,6 KV 138M44 43° 41 226 N 79° 35175 W 169 Blob E1-L0SC20271 Pole 13 Citplew Dr (Dixon 8 27) 4-Transt 5 S&C 5801 OH Switch 276 KV 881442 43° 41 519' N 79° 34 963' W 158 Etob EH_0SC60353 Pole 130 Rexdale Blvd 4-Translt 6 DART 01-I SWtch 27 6 KV 471413 43° 47.652 N 79° 9 217 W 105 h/Y NY_0SC7833 Pole 2 Re/ alda Rd 4-Transit 7 SOC 5801 OH SvAtch 216 KV 55M29 55M7 Etob EH_0SC4858 Pole 316 Rexdale Blvd 4-Transit 8 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 29141 29M33 43° 42 887' N 79° 35 091' W 147 NY NY_0SC18581 Pole 4600 Jane St 4-Transi 9 S8C 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV SS55F1 43' 46 74' N 79° 31.229' W 166 NY NY_0SC65589 Pole 2781 Jane St 4-Transit 10 S&C 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 55M8 43° 44 933' N 79' 3 726' W 19 NY NY_0SC59837 Pole 1927 Sheppard Ave W 4-Transit 11 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 55M25 43' 44 366' N 79° 3.719' W 166 NY NY_0SC74827 Pole 230 Norlinch Dr 4-Transil 12 SOC 5801 OH Switch 276 KV 55M2 43 46 373- N 79° 31 92 W 19 NY NY_OSC85384 Pole 1384 Finch Ave W 4-Transit 13 S8C 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M32 55M1 43' 45 774' N 79' 29 596' W 198 12 NY NY_0SC32607 Pole 3681 Weston Rd 4-Transit 14 S&C 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 5511131 55M1 43° 45 675 N 79° 32 664' W 173 NY NY_0SC2414 Pole 5 Kenhar Dr (S1086) 4-Trans,' 15 S8 C 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 55M1 43' 05 746 - N 79' 32.442 W 176 NY NY_0SC58091 Pole 36 Tangrers Rd 4-Transit 16 S&C 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M4 43 76351° N 79.48820' W 192 NY NY_0SC2204 Pole 4843 Steeles Ave W 4-Transil 17 S&C 5801 OH Switch 276 KV 55M2 555132 43° 46.267 N 79' 32.511' W 19 NY NY_0SC5251 Pole 121 Penman Dr (S116) 4-Transit 18 S&C 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 55M5 55M1 43° 45 568' N 79° 32 94' W 157 NY NY_0SC5933 Pole 465 Eddystone Ave 4-Transit 19 S&C 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV A53DN A273DN ar 44.87' N 79' 31 56 W 155 NY NY_PSC66410A Pole 3429 Duttenn St (Yorkdale Mall 4-Transil 20 5802 Vista 27 6 KV 35M3 85M9 43.725227' N 79 4569250 W 161 in NY NY_PSC66410B Pole 3429 Duftenn SI (Yorkdale Mall 4-Transit 20 5802 Vista 216 KV 35513 85M9 43.725227' N 79.456925 ° W 181 m NY NY_OSC9275 Pole 168 Millwick Dr 4.Transit 21 S&C 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 55M22 43' 45621' N 79° 34 245' W 164 NY NY_0SC957 Pole 75 Signet Dr 4-Transit 22 S&C 5801 01-I SwItch 27 6 KV 55M32 55M5 43' 45 538' N 79' 32 336'141 169 h/Y NY_OSC3130 Pole 2209 Sheppard Ave W 4-Transil 23 S8C 5E101 OH Switch 27 6 KV 55M29 55M26 43' 44 195 N 79 ° 31 472 W 188 NY NY_0SC9429 Pole 112-1 Norfinch Dr 4-Transil 24 SOC 5801 OH Svntch 27 6 KV 55M2 55M5 43° 4564' N 79' 31.776' W 130 40

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Lirmted B-2011-0120 Interrogatories Responses Tab 5.1 Schedule 15 NY NY_0SC6246 Pole 1630 Finch Ave W 4-Transit 25 S&C 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV Attachment 2 NY NY_05C64055 Pole 138 Brookhaven Dr 4-Transit 26 SEC 5801 OH Snatch 27.6 KV 11M4 43' 42 292' N 76 29 792' W 11 Page 4 of 11 Elob EH_05C30357 Pole 46 Disco Rd 4-Transit 27 SEC 5801 OH Swilch 13.8 KV N3555FMMF38.1 NFF1 43° 42 107 N 79° 35.507' W 176 NY NY_OSC52383 Pole 97 Torbarne Rd 4-Transit 28 SEC 5801 OH Snatch 27 6 KV 55M26 43° 43 556 N 79' 31.396' W 137 NY NY_05 C4048 Pole 4 Sheffield St 4-Transit 29 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 53561M712 35M8 ar 02 T N 79' 28 141' W 11 NY NY_0 SC6723 Pole 13 Bradslock Rd 4-Transit 30 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 43° 44139 N 79 32.317 W 185 NY NY_OSC74655 Pole 32 Tangiers Rd 4-Transit 31 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13.8 KV SS58F4 43.76318° N 79.4881r W 202 NY NY_OSC203 Pole 2370 Finch Ave W 4-Tr anslt 32 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 55M7 55M27 43 45114' N 79° 34.666' W 5 NY NY_05C7954 Pole 3983 Keele St 4-Transit 33 SEC 5801 OH Swilch 27 6 KV 85M32 43. 46.85' N 79 29.111' W 222 NY NY_OSC3190 Pole 2565 Jane St 4-TranSit 34 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 55M28 43° 43 981' N 7T 3 676' W 76 NY NY_OSC1315 Pole 3402 Keele St 4-Transit 35 SEC 5801 OH Snatch 27 6 KV 855M2M 85 85M24 4R3e°4.6 49 913' N 79° 29 246 W 168 NY NY_OSC9842 Pole 54 North Park Dr 4-Transit 36 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 35M24 NY NY_OSC67313 Pole 41 Duncanwoods Dr 4-Transit 37 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 55M27 NY NY_OSC7652 Pole 141 Toryork Dr 4-Transit 38 SEC 51301 OH Switch 27 6 KV 55M9 55M22 43° 45 61' N 79' 31256 W 144 NY NY_OSC3401 Pole 1879 Jane SI 4-TransIt 39 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 51M28 51M24 43° 02 561' N 79' 3 314' W 182 NY NY_O5C2321 Pole 2391 Steeles Ave W 4-Transit 40 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 55M2 55M3 43' 47 86' N 79° 28611' W 182 NY NY _05C7621 Pole 1896 Wilson Ave 4-Transit 41 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 55M23 Ready NY NY_O5C6789 POle 4975 Sleeles Ave W 4-Transil 42 S&C 5801 01-1 Switch 27 6 KV 55M32 55M31 43° 46.219 N 79' 32.741 W 169 NY N Y_OSC1934 Pole 4246 Chesswood Dr 4-Transit 43 SEC 5801 OH Swilch 27 6 KV 5855M4 m 2 85M24 43° 45 6' N 79' 28 674' W 198 NY NY_OSC2160 Pole 2801 Weston Rd 4-Transit 44 BC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 43' 43 166' N 79° 32 25' W 138 NY NY_0SC5966 Pole 1244 Orrnont Dr 4-Transit 45 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 55M31 55M1 43° 45 889 N 79° 33 31' W 188 NY NY_OSC2630 Pole 4230 Jane St 4-Transit 46 SEC 5801 OH Swilch 27 6 KV 55M3 43° 45.66 N 79' 31 131' W 216 NY NY_0SC96074 Pole 222 Norfinch Or 4-Transit 47 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV SS55F1 SS55F5 43' 46 326 N 79° 31.91 W 2 NY NY_O5C4311 Pole 4220-13 York Gate Blvd 4-Transit 48 SEC 5801 OH Smich 27 6 KV 55M2 55M30 43' 45 551 N 79' 13 325' W 186 NY NY_OSC78613 Pole 1057 Flint Rd 4-Transit 49 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M2 43' 46 883' N 79 28.721' W 197 NY NY_OSC1675 Pole 840 Flint Rd 4-Transil 50 SEC 51301 OH Switch 27 8 KV 85M2 85M7 43° 46 538' N 79' 28.878' W 27 Etob EH_OSC37859 Pole 6138 Hwy 0 27 4-Transit 51 SEC 5801 OH Swath 27.6 KV 29M1 43' 43 496' N 79° 35 966' W 161 NY NY_O5 C29837 Pole 15 Dante Rd 4-Transil 52 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 340424 43' 42 548' N 79' 29.42' W 129 NY NY_OSC82651 Pole 457 Glen Park Ave 4-Transit 53 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 3355MM712 43- 42 472' N 79° 27.26' W 166 NY NY_0SC47B99 Pole 2959 Steeles Ave W 4-Transit 54 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 55M24 85M3 43° 46 91 N 79' 29 589' W 2 NY NY_OSC31480 Pole 533 Rustic Rd 4-Transit 55 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 135M9 35M24 NY NY_OSC46232 Pole 29 Clayson Rd 4-Transit 56 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 55M21 55M23 NY NY_0SC71379 Pole 152 Clayson Rd 4-Transit 57 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 43° 43 626 N 79° 31.712 W NY NY_OSC78043 Pole 1620 Wilson Ave 4-Transit 58 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 555M2M 26 55M28 43' 43 246' N 79° 3 616' W 19 NY NY_OSC69795 Pole 729 Trethewey Dr 4-Transit 59 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 11144 Etob EH_OSCE15410 Pole 60 Rexdale Blvd 4-Transit 60 SEC 5801 OH Snatch 27 6 KV 88M1 55M6 43 71332' N 79 56081° W 164 NY N Y_OSC93629 Pole 218 Norelco Dr 4-Transit 61 DART O H Switch 27 6 KV 551'432 55N12 NY NY_OSC29608 Pole 8 Wallsey Ave 4-Transit 62 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 55M21 NY NY_OSC71389 Pole 14 Fisherville Rd 4-Transit 65 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27Z KV 85M7 13505MM; 43' 47.406 N 79' 26 872' W unknown Elob EH_OSC20261 Pole 229 Claireville Rd 4-Transit 66 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV BRP2 43° 44.753' N 79 ° 37 415' W 175 Etob EH_OSC90097 Pole 559 Carrier Dr 4-Transit 67 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV BBRBFF; E0F3 43' 44 294' N 79° 36 532' W 169 Etob EH_OSC54729 Pole 227 Carrier Or 4-Transit 68 SEC 5801 01-1 Switch 27 6 KV BRF2 EOF3 43' 44 824' N 79' 36.901' W 173 Etob EH_OSC92162 Pole 100 Dixon Rd 4-Transit 69 SEC 5801 OH Sna tch 27.6 KV 813M18 43° 41.998' N 79° 32 095' W 190 NY NY_OSC72476 Pole 2562 Finch Ave W 4-Transit 70 SEC 5801 OH Snatch 27 6 KV 55M27 43' 44 916' N 79° 33 615' W 161 NY NY_OSC458616 Pole 2203-1 Sheppard Ave W 4-Transit 71 SEC 5801 Ohl Switch 27 6 KV 55M29 55M25 43° 44 217 N 79' 31.416' W 142 NY NY_OSC97234 Pole 4034 Keele St 4-Transit 72 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV B5M32 43° 46.325' N 79' 29 607' W 188 Elob EH_OSC82070 Pole 418 Carltngview Or 4-Transit 73 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV EHF1 557F33N 43 69769' N 79 60067° W 161 Etob EH_O5C74966 Pole 907 Dixon Rd 4-Transtl 74 SEC 5801 OH Snatch 13.8 KV NFF1 ZJF2 43 68670° N 79 59440° W 144 Slob EH_OSC33561 Pole 74-1 Guided Crt 4-Transit 75 SEC 5801 OH Snatch 13 8 KV ECIF2 43° 45 236' N 79° 36.539' W 166 Etob EH_OSC88773 Pole 66 Guided CH 4-Transii 76 SEC 5801 OH Snatch 13 8 KV EBOOFF11 EQF2 43° 45.252 N 79' 36.490'W 146 Eros EH_OSC99407 Pole 50 Leading Rd 4-Transt 77 BC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV E0F3 43 73509" N 79 60861* W 179 Eta EH_OSC42959 Pole 7090 Hwy #27 4-Transil 78 SEC 5801 OH SWileil 13.8 KV EQF3 80F2 43° 44 171' N 79° 36 292' W 188 Elob EH_0SC21692 Pole 7198 Hwy 827 4-Transit 79 SEC 5801 OH Switch 118 KV EOF 1 60F3 43' 45 118' N 79° 36 724' W 188 Elob EH_0SC95089 Pole 17708 Albion Rd 4-Transit 80 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV EQF3 43 ° 44 629' N 7T 36.248' W 175 Elob EH_OSC31064 Pole 6950 Hwy 0 27 4-Transit 81 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV BC/OF ; NFF1 43' 42.041' N 79 35 674' W 173 Elob EH_OSC16399 Pole 280 CarlIngview Or 4-Transit 82 S&C 5801 OH Snatch 27.6 KV EHF2 ZJF2 43° 41 356 N 79° 35 809' W 175 Bob EH_OSC5738 Pole 278 Cartingview Dr 4-Transit 83 SEC 5801 OH Snatch 27_6 KV EEHHPF11 ZEJHFF12 43° 41 338' N 79' 35 798' W 174 Etob EH_OSC11625 Pole 336 Carlingview Dr 4-Transit 84 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13.8 KV 43` 41 625' N 79° 35 940' W 167 El.!, EH_OSC93976 Pole 909 Dixon Rd 4-Transil 92 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV NEF1 43.68658' N 79 59473' W 173 Blob EFLOSC60813 Pole 19 Marmac Dr 4-Transit 93 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV ZNIFFFI1 NFF3 43' 41E0Er N 79' 35 240' W 170 Etob EH_OSC30877 Pole 31 McLachlan Dr 4-Transil 94 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV NIFF1 NFF3 43° 41 599'14 79° 35 253' W 164 Elob EH_OSC42909 Pole 17 McLachlan Dr 4-Transit 95 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV NFF2 NFF3 43° 41 613' N 79' 35 174' W 177 Etob EH_OSC77371 Pole 80 Brockport Dr 4-Transil 96 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV NFF2 NFF1 43° 41 650' N 79' 37.111' W 177 Etob EH_OSC77010 Pole 5 Fordwich Ores 4-Transii 97 5.40 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 5259.m73 551,44 43 72684 1 N 79 561251 W 142 NY NY_0SC20790 Pole 3214 Weston Rd 4-Transit 98 SEC 5901 Ohl Switch 27 6 KV 43' 44.306 II 79' 32.365' W 157 Etob EH_0SC53476 Pole 55 Carrier Dr 4-Transil 99 SEC 51301 CH Switch 27 6 KV 29M6 5295M375 41738429° N 79 607902° W Tor TO_OSC13038 Pole 76 Hallam St 4-Transil 100 SEC 5801 OH Switch 13.8 KV A255DN Elob EH_05072044 Pole 128, Belfield Rd 4-Transii 101 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 88M1 60643 Etob EH_05067169 Pole 66 Disco Rd 4-Transit 102 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 88148 88M43 43.70144' N 79 59480' W 175 Etat, EH_OSC81061 Pole 259 Hurnberline Dr 4-Transit 104 SEC 5801 OH Snatch 27 6 KV 29M36 29M6 Etob EH_00044784 Pole 6779 Steeles Ave W 4-Tr000 it 105 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 016M4 D6M1 43 75745' N 79 60490' W 192 Etob EH_OSC130131 Pole 1317 Martin Grove Rd 4-Transit 106 SEC 5801 OH Snatch 27 6 KV 29M5 29M33 43.71383° N 79 58075' W 167 Etob EH_OSC17908 Pole 20 Huddersfield Rd 4-Transit 107 SOS 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 43 74240° N 79 62515' W 181 Elob EH_OSC56767 Pole 7100 Hwy 027 4-Transit 108 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 2599MM355 43.73774° N 79 60516' W 173 Etob EH_OSC36624 Pole 7094 Hwy #27 4-Transit 109 SEC 5801 OH Snatch 27 6 KV 29 ,4M21 222989114MM3266 43 73712' N 79 60480° W 181 Etob EH_OSC21392 Pole 7022 Hwy 927 4-Transit III) SEC 5801 01-1 Switch 27.6 KV 29M2 43 72323° N 79 59873' W 107 Etob El-1_06078249 Pole 14 Racine Rd 4-Transit 111 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 29M33 28 9RkFtt 3 43.71550° N 79 57358' W 198 Et ob EH_OSC28369 Pole 266B Huberlinem Dr 4-Transit 112 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV BRF2 NY NY_05062920 Pole 9 Eddystone Ave 4-Transit 113 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 55M8 4 31 7 546E12936° N _77995512631642° VV 172 NY hlY_OSC82536 Pole 2058 Finch Ave W 4-Transil 119 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 55M8 185 NY NY_OSC5149 Pole 2316 Finch Ave W 9-Transit 115 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27_6 KV 43 75233 -79 54163 145 NY NY_OSC79515 Pole 6 Tangiers Rd 4-Transit 116 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 8555MM47 43.76114 -79.48763 220 NY NY_OSC80150 Pole 1 Oak St 4-Transit 117 SEC 5801 01-1 Switch 27 6 KV 55M7 88M12 43 70833 79 53078 130 NY NY_05077270 Pole 319 Oak St 4-Transit 118 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 55M7 S5M23 43.70842 79 53036 152 NY NY_05025905 Pole 3812 Keele St 4-Transit 119 S&C 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 135M4 85M32 4175997° N 79.49034° W 221 NY NY_OSC13147 Pole 2090 Finch Ave W 4-Transil 120 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 55M10 55M8 43 7559T N 79 52476° W 171 NY NY_O5C70002 Pole 20 Norfinch Ave 4-Transit 121 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 55M24 43_756435 N 79 52464° W 183 NY NY_OSC11567 Pole 2100 Finch Ave W 4-Transit 122 SEC 5801 01-I Switch 27 6 KV 43.75583° N 79 52559° Of 164 NY NY_OSC52481 Pole 960 Oakdale Rd 4-Transil 123 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 5055MM; 86 43 75865' N 79.52425. W 174 NY Ny_OSC87697 Pole 481-1 Sentinel Rd 4-Transit 124 SEC 51301 OH Switch 27.6 KV 55M24 43.76381 ° N 79 50083° W 191 m Etob EH_PSC94783 840 Hurnberwood Blvd 4-Transit 125 DART PMH-9 27 6 KV R29M36 R29M2 43.73024' N 79 61946' W 159 Elob EI-I_PSC90900 146 Westrnore Dr 4-Transit 126 DART PMH-9 118 KV BO-F2 4333440° N 79 60112' W 147 Etob EH_PSC61609 30 Humberline Dr 4-Transit 127 DART PMH-9 13.8 KV BR-F3 43 731855° N 79615410' W 166 Etob EH_PSC36546 10 Humberline Dr 4-Transit 128 DART PMH-9 13 8 KV 8R-F3 43 73145° N 79 61177° W 145

41

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited atoriEeEts-R211.-00,12es Interrog Tab 5.1 Schedule 15 NY NY_0SC67148 Pole 242 Albion Rd 4-Transit 129 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 55M4 55M7 43 72002° N 79 54360 W 12 AzZleofnt121 NY NY_0SC23095 Pole 3497 Weston Rd 4-Transil 131 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 55M7 41751812 N 79 54219° W 128 rn Etch EH_P1C33905 Finch Ave W. W(O Hurnber College 4-TransIt 132 DART PMH-9 13.8 KV BR-F2 43.73437° N 79 61309° W 171 Etob EH_01C4783 Pole 2329 Islingion Ave 4-1ransit 133 SIC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 55M6 43.71752' N 79 55605' W 146 Etob EH_P5C95983 179 Provence Trail 4-Transit 134 DART PMH-9 13 8 KV E0F1 43.75529° N 79 60687° W 184 Slob 61-1_P5C35024 100 Cabernet Cir (N/Pad) 4-Transil 145 DART PMI-1-9 13.8 KV EOF1 4375151° N 79.60454° W 149 rn Etob EH_PSC92012 100 Cabernet Cir IS/Pad) 4-Transit 146 DART PMH-9 13.8 KV 43 75144° N 79 60447" W 148 rn Elob_YK YK_0SC9385 Pole 10 Todd Balyis Blvd 4-Transit 150 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 61 01M 7.11 11M2 ar 41 549' 6 79° 29 129 W 119 Elob_YK EFLOSC18917 Pole 492 Weston Rd 4-Transit 151 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 88M12 43 707438° N 79533499' W 155 m Tx: 941.0437 5 - Transit Master 3434 Eglinton Ave E 5 Ric 941.04375 Scar SC_05C63227 Pole 175 Coronation St 5-Transit 1 DART 3 95 OH Swnch 27 6 KV 47M15 43° 45 72' N 79° 11 125 W Scar SC_05C60779 Pole 4131 Lawrence Ave E 5-Transit 2 DART 3 95 OH Switch 27 6 KV H9M21 47M5 43° 46 I& N 79' 11 542' W Scar SC_OSC11811 Pole 39-385 Danforth Rd 5-Transit 3 DART 3 95 OH Svntch 27 6 KV 43M29 43° 43 369' N 79° 15 342' W 157 Scar SC_OSC2I482 Pole 2826 Eglinton Ave E 5-Transit 4 DART 395 OH Switch 27.6 KV E5M5 157 Scar SC_0SC85939 Pole 4634 Kingston Rd 5-Transit 6 DART OH Switch 27.6 KV 47M14 47M7 43 774997° N 70178566' W 170 Scat SC_0505813 Pole 435 Kingston Rd 5-Transit 7 DART 3 95 OH Switch 27 6 KV 47M14 ar 46 142' N 79' 11.318' W Scar SC_0SC3206 Pole 4232 Kingston Rd 5-Transil 8 DART 3 95 OH Switch 27 6 KV 47M15 47M14 43' 45 653' N 79' 11.795' W Scar SC_05C52727 Pole 225 Guildwood Ave 5-Transit 9 DART 395 OH Switch 276 KV 47M15 43° 44 967' N 79° 11 40' W Scar SC_OSC53619 Pole 3812 Kingston Rd 5-Transit 10 SEC 5801 ON Switch 27 6 KV H9M3 47M15 43' 44 968' N 79° 12 381' W Scar SC_O5C21889 Pole 3267 Kingston Rd 5-Transit 11 DART 3.95 OH Switch 27 6 KV E5M3 69M3 43° 43 851' N 79° 13 559' W 167 Scar SC_DJ 150 Orton Park 5-Transit 12 SEL 2032 Substation 4 KV Scar SC_OSC1031 Pole 530 Midland Ave 5-Transit 13 DART OH Switch 27.6 KV 43M3 43' 43 38' N 79° 15.57' W Scar SC_0SC74990 Pole 384 Beechgrove Dr 5-Transit 14 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV Scar SC_05091703 Pole 645 Coronation Dr 5-Transit IS DART 195 OH Switch 27.6 KV 4 7M7M 7 43° 45 962' N 79' 9 65' W Scar SC_OSC2007 Pole 821 Brimley Rd 5-Transit 16 DART 3 95 OH Switch 27 6 KV E5M22 E5M23 43° 45 185' N 79' 15 295' W Scar SC_OSC35169 Pole 1558 Birchinounl Rd 5-Transit 17 DART 3 95 OH Switch 27 6 KV E5111 43' 45 713' N 79' 17.455 W Scar SC_OSC42204 Pole 1232 Brimley Rd 5-Transil 18 DART OH Switch 27.6 KV E525124 Scar SC_OSC11234 Pole 1987 Lawrence Ave E 5-Transit 19 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 52M9 43' 44 695' N 79' 17 78' W 184 992 Scar SC_OSC70141 Pole 572 Birchrnount Rd 5-Transil 20 DART 3 95 OH SWitch 27 6 KV 43M43 43M213 43° 42.85'19 79° 16.253' W 489 Scar SC_OSC32426 Pole 1313 Pharmacy Ave 5-Transit 21 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 52M8 43. 45 224' N 79° 18 523' W 174 3456 Scar SC_OSC33094 Pole 14-285 Brian Ave 5-Transit 22 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 52M8 43' 44 624' N 79° 12 71' W 185.928 Scar SC_RF 29 Canadian Rd 5-Transit 23 TEL 2032 Substation 4 KV Scar SC_OSC38185 Pole 845 Ellesmere Rd 5-Transit 24 DART 3 95 OH Switch 27 6 KV E5M1 E5M29 43° 45 91' N 79° 16 994' W 167 Scar SC_0SC23978 Pole 102 McCowan Rd 5-Transit 25 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV E5M3 43° 44 31' N 79. 14 175' W 166 Scar SC_TJ Birchrnount . Ashlonbee 5-Transit 26 SEL 2032 Substation 4 KV Scar SC_RJ Morningside - Coronation 5-Transit 27 TEL 2032 Substation 4 KV Scar SC_TA Sounder - Kingston 5-Transit 28 SEL 2032 Substation 4 KV Scar SC_TO 500 Coronation Dr 5Transit 29 SEL 2032 Substation 4 KV 43° 45 951' N 79' 9 779' W 133 872 Scar SC_OSC72810 Pole 347-C Danforth Rd 5-7ransit 30 DART 3 95 0115,114h 27 6 KV 43M24 43M28 43' 42.224' N 79' 16.211' W 16 Scar SC_OSC71732 Pole 101-A Mack Ave 5.Transit 31 DART 3 95 OH Switch 27 6 KV 43M24 43M28 43' 42 91' N 79' 15.948' W 158 Scar SC_OSC3385 Pole 3 Hollis Ave 5-Transit 32 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 43M23 43M24 43° 44 624' N 79 12.71' W 129.2352 Scar SC_0SC19519 Pole 56 Anson Ave 5-Transit 33 DART 3.95 OH Switch 27 6 KV 43M29 4E75mA/1137 43' 43655 N 79. 14.165' W 18 Scar SC_OSC98546 Pole 60 East Ave 5-Transit 34 DART 395 OH Switch 27 6 KV 47M6 43° 46 954' N 79' 17 95 W 11 NY NY_OSC81004 Pole 2764-51 Old Leslie SL Rear 29.5-Transit 35 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 51M23 Scar SC_OSC11803 Pole 49 Bertrand Ave 5-Transit 36 DART 3.95 OH Switch 27 6 KV 43M25 43° 44 79' N 79° 16 928' W 159 414 Scar SC_0SC264 Pole 3080 Eglinton Ave E 5-Transit 37 DART 3 95 OH Switch 27.6 KV E5M5 FIE598123 43° 44 477 N 79° 13 648' W 159 Scar SC_0SCI3977 Pole 126 Bennet Rd 5.Transit 36 DART 3 95 OH Switch 27 6 KV 47M16 43 772496° N 79 166390' W 128 Scar SC_OSC9416 Pole 365 Centennial Rd 5-Transit 39 DART 3 95 OH Switch 27.6 KV 47M13 47M7 M 1 36 43' 47.652' N 79' 9 217' W 15 Pole 630 Pharmacy Ave, N/0 St 40 153 3144 Scar 5C_OSC10521 Clair Ave 5-Transit DART 195 OH Switch 27.6 KV 43M27 E5M6 43' 42 621' N 79' 17 479 W Pole 3563 Lawrence Ave E, W/O 41 167 9448 Scar SC_OSC26044 Markham Rd 5-Transit DART 3 95 OH Switch 27 6 KV 4E75mM1253 199M3 43' 45 568' N 79' 11582' W Scar SC_OSC65736 Pole 221 Coronation Dr 5-Trans.1 42 DART OH Switch 27 6 KV H9M29 41 762341' N 79 181598° W 298' Scar SC_OSC60575 Pole 4181 Lawrence Ave E 5-Transit 43 DART 3_95 OH Switch 27.6 KV 47M5 47MI 5 43' 46 79 N 79° 11 246' W Scar SC_OSC65544 Pole 4247 Lawrence Ave E 5-Transit 44 DART 3 95 OH SwrIch 27 6 KV H47:01259 191129 43 769127° N 79 181916° W 146 Srca SC_OSC90459 Pole 358 Coronation Dr 5-Transit 45 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 471116 43' 45 976' N 79' 1 32T W 111 8616 Scar SC_OSC96095 Pole 303 Port Union Rd 5-Trans.t 46 DART 3.95 OH Switch 27.6 KV PJF1 XGF2 43' 47 385' N 79'8 436' W 97 231 Scar SC_OSC99384 Pole 6560 Lawrence Ave E 5-Transit 47 DART OH Switch 13 8KV XGF1 XGF3 Scar SC_OSC81900 Pole 6223 Lawrence Ave E 5-Transit 48 DART 3 95 OH Switch 13 8KV PJF3 Scar SC_OSC11170 Pole 175 Ellesrnere Rd 5-Transit 49 SIC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV EX 5GMF; 43° 45 61' N 79' 18 37' W 139 932 Pole 65-45 McCowan Rd, 19/0 156 576 Scar SC_OSC9874 Lawrence Ave E 5-Transil 5° SAC 5801 OH Switch 276 KV E5M23 H9M28 43. 44 624' N 79° 12 71' W Scar SC_OSC13178 Pole 571 Coronation Dr 5-Transit 51 SIC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 47M7 47M16 Scar SC_0SC5477 Pole 73-75 Bellamy Rd 5.Transii 52 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV H9M28 43' 44 624' N 79' 12.71' W 15 Scar SC_OSC3515 Pole 56-35 Brunley Rd 5-Transit 53 SIC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 51M22 43' 44.633' N 79° 15 68' W 158 Scar SC_OSC2961 Pole 1031 Danforth Rd 5-Transit 54 SIC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 4433mM2239 E5M25 43' 44.42' N 79' 14.666' W 166 116 Scar SC_05C6864 Pole 3122 Danforth Ave 5-Transit 55 SIC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 43M27 43' 41.511' N 79' 17 168' W 126 7968 Scar_EY EY_OSC7562 Pole 2638 SI Clair Ave E 5-Transit 56 SIC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 53M7 53M3 43° 44 624' N 79' 12,71' W 12 396 Scar SC_0SC1602 Pole 1263 Warden Ave 5-Transit 57 SIC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV E5M1 43M26 ar 43 329' N 79' 17 126' W 156 576 Scar SC_SA Kingston - Morningside 5-Transil 58 SEL 2032 Substation 4 KV Scar SC_OSC195 Pole 865 Pharmacy Ave 5-Transil 59 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 5M6 Scar SC_O5C82482 Pole 30-112 Birchmount Rd 5-Transit 60 SEC 5801 OFI Switch 27 6 KV 5113 Scar SC_OSC58475 Pole 435 Comstock Rd 5-Transit 61 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 4433MM;66 Scar SC_OSC73914 Pole 3560 St Clair Ave E 5-Transit 62 SIC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 43M30 Scar SC_OSC87400 Pole 6048irchmount Rd 5-Transit 63 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 43M29 43M26 Scar SC_OSC90460 Pole 3279 Lawrence Ave E 5-Transit 54 S&C 51101 OH Switch 27 6 KV 5M23 Scar SC_0SC64201 Pole 2628 McGowan Rd 5-Transit 65 DART OH Switch 27 6 KV 63116 Scar SC_AB 10 Lupin 5-Transit 66 TEL 2032 Substation 4 KV 43' 44 624' N 79' 1271' W 169 4688 Scar SC_05012863 Pole 968 Port Union Rd 5-Transit 67 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 47M17 Scar SC_OSC72806 Pole 2949 Kingston Rd 5-Transit 68 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 431,430 651413 43' 724564 N 79° 232875 W 152 NY NY_OSC24776 Pole 150-1 Carnforth Rd 5-Transit 69 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 53M8 43° 43 851' N 79' 13 559' W 496 ft NY NY_OSC63454 Pole 1594 Victoria Park Ave 5-Transit 70 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 53M6 NY NY_O5C8654 Pole 297.1 EglinIon Ave E 5-Transit 71 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV Scar SC_OSC2234 Pole 19-342 Kingston Rd @ Meadow 5-Transit 72 SIC 5801 01-I Switch 27.6 KV 4347MM613 47M16 43° 78.875' N 79° 16.247 W 84 NY NY_0SC16780 Pole 2 Sweeney Or 5-Transit 73 SIC 5801 01-I Swilch 27 6 KV 53M6 53M8 Scar SC_FE 20 Underwriters Rd 5.Transit 74 2032 Subslation 4 KV NY NY_OSC/304138 Pole 1589 Victoria Park Ave 5-Transit 75 SIC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV E5M8 43 728697° N 79 304126° W 148 Scar SC_OSC43119 Pole 6896 Warden Ave 5-Transit 76 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 453M26 43M24 43 42452° 14 79 16733" W 140 Scar SC_05C36264 Pole 111 Brimley Rd 5-Transit 77 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 43M2g E5M25 Scar SC_05074582 Pole 161 Galloway Rd 5-Transit 78 SEC 5801 01-I Switch 27.6 KV 691129 43.763011' N 79 195028' W 162 Scar SC_O5C57791 Pole 223 Copperfield Rd 5-Transit 79 SEC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 479MM1249H 47M7 43 760359° N 79 168229' W 145 Scar SC_05C37709 Pole 741 Kennedy Rd 5-Transit 80 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 43M29 4.E35mM258 43 731099' N 79267388' W 170 Scar SC_OSCE12123 Pole 425 Kennedy Rd 5-Transit 81 SIC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 43M29 43.42960' N 79 15683° W 158 Scar SC_P5C3763 Warden Ave & Metropolitan Rd 5-Transit 82 DART Pft4H-11 27 6 KV 5M9 52M22 42

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited 06-2011-0120 interrogatories Responses Tab S 1 Schedule 15 TX: 6 - Transit Master 6 Forest Laneway 928.70625 Fir 928.70625 Artachrnent 2 NY NY_06026437 Pole 02-1 Prince Andrew PI 6-Transit 1 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 34MS Page 6 of 11 NY NY_0SC73169 Pole 5 Finch Ave W 6-Transit 2 SSC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 8M3 43° 46 777 N 79° 24 971' W 96 9 NY NY_OSC61755 Pole 956 Willowdale Ave 6-Transit 3 SOC 5801 OH Swilch 27 6 KV 8M4 8M6 43° 47 289 N 79° 24 6' W 166 NY NY_05C4593 Pole 43 Dudley Ave 6-Transit 5 SOC 51301 OH Switch 27 6 KV BOMS 80M29 43° 45.874' N 79° 24 680' W 160 NY NY_05C8927 Pole 3620 Duff enn St 6-Transit 6 SSC 5601 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M9 Ready NY NY_OSC573 Pole 4976 Bathurst St 6-Transit 7 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 8M9 Ready NY NY_0SC76728 Pole 1346 Sheppard Ave E 6-Transit 8 SOC 5801 OH Sitilch 13.8 KV SS68F2 NY NY_0SC79333 Pole 3108 Victoria Park Ave 6-Transit 9 DART 3.95 OH Switch 27 6 KV 51M32 NY NY_0SC98517 Pole 1298 Sheppard Ave E 6-Transit 10 DART 3 95 OH Switch 27 6 KV 51M24 51146 NY NY _05014134 Pole 1021 Lawrence Ave E 6-Transil 11 DART 3.95 OH Swilch 27 6 KV 53M10 535025 NY NY_0SC29453 Pole 7 Colville Rd 6-Transit 12 DART 3.95 OH Sweet, 27.6 KV 35M12 351412 NY NY_05C63962 Pole 2417 Keele St 6-Transit 13 DART 3.95 OH Switch 276 KV 35k412 351424 NY NY_OSC41259 Pole 2588 Victoria Park Ave 6-Transit 14 SOC 5801 01-1 Switch 27 6 KV 51M4 NY NY_0SC95536 Pole 2359 Bayview Ave 6-Transit 15 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 51M21 34M7 Tor TO_0SC49431 Pole 345 Mount Pleasant Rd 6-Transil 16 SOC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV A210DX A13L 43° 42 419' N 79° 23 36E W 165 NY NY_0SC63706 Pole 137 Johnston Ave 6-Transit 17 SOC 5801 01-1 Switch 27 6 KV 80M30 43 7574 -79 41704 91 m NY NY_0SC21702 Pole 266 Fisherville Rd 6-Transit 18 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 85M7 43 78707° N 79 49161° W 191 NY NY_0SC3951 Pole 459 Patricia Ave 6-Transit 19 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 8M2 NY NY_O5C19741 Pole 11 Steeles Ave W 6-Transit 20 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 801421 43 79770' N 79 42094° W 131 NY NY_0SC209 Pole 203 Hilda Ave 6-Transit 22 ESC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 81410 NY NY_0SC4594 Pole 551 Curnmer Ave 6-Transil 23 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 52M5 NY NY_05C59862 Pole 5952 Bathust St 6-Transit 24 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 801413 80M2 43 782488 N 79 44534° W 219 NY NY_0SC44941 Pole 3622 Victoria Park Ave 6-Transit 25 68.0 51301 OH Switch 27.6 KV 52M27 51M32 NY NY_0SC3939 Pole 375 Steeles Ave E 6-Transit 26 SOC 5801 OH Svntch 27 6 KV 80M21 51M3 NY NY_0SC19417 Pole 2513 Steeles Ave E 6-Transil 27 SSC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 51M27 NY NY_0SC6921 Pole 3196 Bayview Ave 6-Transit 28 SSC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 51M8 51M5 NY NY_0SC56263 Pole 514 Dudley Ave 6-Transit 29 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV SIM27 511432 NY NY_05C29169 Pole 2103 Steeles Ave E 6-Transit 30 SOC 5801 OH SwIch 27 6 KV 51M3 NY NY_0SC90710 Pole 2002 Sheppard Ave E 6-Transit 31 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 51M4 011422 NY NY_05011328 Pole 2043 Bayview Ave 6-Transil 32 SSC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 34M6 NY NY_0SC5286 Pole 1101 Magnellc Dr 6-Transit 33 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M3 85M6 Tor 70_05C67346 Pole 85 Oriole Pkwy 6-Transit 34 SOC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV A2500X 43 700470 N 79 40403° W 174 in NY NY_0SC1710 Pole 3952 Dultenn St 6-Transt 35 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M3 NY NY_05C36749 Pole 1292 Lawrence Ave E 6-Transil 39 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 53146 NY NY_S190 Pole 1895 Leslie SI 6-Transit 40 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 51M3 51M7 NY NY_05C2131 Pole 1212-1 Finch Ave E 6-Transt 41 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27E KV 51M26 NY NY_05C63730 Pole 1202-1 Finch Ave E 6-71001i1 42 SIIC 51301 OH Switch 27.6 KV 511426 51518 43' 47 454' N 79' 21 807 W 65 NY NY_05C85382 Pole 303 Van Horne Ave 6-Transit 43 SIC 5801 01-1 &ditch 27 6 KV 51M28 NY NY_05C902 Pole 610 Wilson Ave 6-Transit 44 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M1 85M9 Ready NY NY_0SC8491 Pole 30 Easton Rd 6-Transit 45 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 85M8 130M30 NY NY_0SC1256 Pole 253 HON! ROW W/O Victoria F 6-Transit 46 SSC 5801 OH Swilch 27 6 KV SS613F6 43° 48.95' N 79' 2 176 W 184 NY NY_0SC7773 Pole 2536 Bayview Ave 6-Transit 47 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 51M21 NY NY_0SC4843 Pole 1894 Victoria Park Ave 6-Transit 48 SOC 51301 OH Switch 27 6 KV 531426 53146 43° 44.598' N 79° 18 621W 165 NY NY_0SC2118 Pole 89 Underhill Dr 6-Transil 09 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 53M25 Ready NY NY_0SC8209 Pole 486 Lawrence Ave E 6-Transit 50 SOC 51301 OH Switch 27 6 KV 34M7 NY NY_0SC3973 Pole 11 Banbury Rd 6-Transit 51 VIC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 34M6 53M24 NY NY_0SC4679 Pole 338 Willowdale Ave 6-Transit 52 SOC 5801 OH Swilch 27.6 KV 8M6 43' 46 367 N 79° 24 21' W 169 7736 NY NY_0SC4655 Pole 5 Kenneth Ave 6-Transit 53 SOO 5801 OH Swiloh 27 6 KV 8M213 43° 45 817' N 79° 24 327 W 34 NY NY_OSC1179 Pole 2440 Sheppard Ave E 6-Transit 54 SSC 5801 01-1 Switch 27.6 KV 5668F7 SS68F6 NY NY_0SC2363 Pole 465 Steeles Ave E 6-Transil 55 SOC 5801 01-1 Switch 27 6 KV S568F4 SS68F 1 43° 48 47 N 79' 22 41' W 182 274 NY NY_0SC3898 Pole 865-16 Don Mills Rd (Rear 17 0 6-Transt 56 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 83M27 53M2 43 43 767 N 79° 19 959' W 25 NY NY_OSC9351 Pole 1390-1 York Mills Rd. Approx 1516-Transit 57 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 51M29 43° 45 379' N 79' 2 817 W 12 NY NY_0SC4778 Pole 110 Willowdale Ave 6-Transit 58 SOC 5801 OH Switch 276 KV 80M29 80M6 NY NY_0SC9200 Pole 288 York Mills Rd 5-Transit 59 SSC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 8M29 51M21 43° 44 86E N 79° 23 152' W 15 876 NY NY_0SC639 Pole 881 York Mills Rd 6-Transit 60 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 53M28 NY NY_0SC1727 Pole 52 York Mills Rd 6-Transe 61 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M8 80M29 NY NY_0SC4017 Pole 4403 Bathurst SI 6-Transit 62 SOC 5801 OH SvAtch 27.6 KV 861427 NY NY_0509792 Pole 2061 Sleeles Ave W 6-Transit 63 SOC 5801 01-1 Switch 27 6 KV 85M7 NY NY_0SC353 Pole 695 Finch Ave W 6-Transt 64 SOC 5801 01-1 Swilch 27 6 KV 8M8 85146 43° 46 221' N 79' 27 578' W 191 NY NY_05C6338 Pole 6 Alness SI 6-Transit 65 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M31 85M2 NY NY_PSC1999 282 Upper Highland Gres 6-Transit 66 DART 3 95 PMH-9 27 6 KV 80M29 NY NY_0SC92822 Pole 3142 Elayview Ave 6-Transit 67 SSC 5801 OH Svinch 27 6 KV 51M8 NY NY_0SC27253 Pole 1198 Lawrence Ave 6-Transit 68 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 53M25 53146 Tor TO_0SC29782 Pole 137 Duplex Avenue 6-Transit 69 SOC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV A22005 43° 70 5274' N 79° 39 989E W 128 Elob_YX YK_0SC75252 Pole 427 Hopewell Ave 6-Transit 70 58,0 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 35M2 35M9 43 69984' N 79 44559' W 175 NY NY_0SC5072 Pole 3 Ranee Ave 6-Transit 71 SSC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M26 85M5 NY NY_OSC10376 Pole 287 Ranee Ave 6-Transit 72 SOC 5801 OH Swtch 27E KV 35M7 Ready 162 7632 Tor T0_0SC4941 Pole 226 Duplex Ave 6-Transit 73 SOC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV A23DX A22GL Tor 70_05C4764 Pole 264 Duplex Ave 6-Transit 74 SSG 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV A22GL Tor TO_0SC3586 Pole 57 St Clements Ave 6-Transil 75 SOC 5801 OH SwItch 13 El KV A23DX Tor TO_0SC2261 Pole 31 Lawrence Ave W 6-Transit 76 SOC 5801 OH Svatch 13 8 KV 422GL A240L Tor 70_05C4256 Pole 174 Duplex Ave 6-Transit 77 SOC 5801 OH Switch 13.8 KV A23DX Tor TO_0SC8344 Pole 14 Strathallan Blvd 6-Transil 78 SOC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV A2305 A24DX NY NY_PSC834 245 Consumer Rd 6-Transit 79 DART 3 95 PM1-1-11 27 6 KV 51M28 Tor TO_0SC3169 Pole 61 Roselawn Ave 6-Transrt 80 SIX 5801 OH Svotch 13 8 KV A24DX Scar_EY EY_05C600 Pole 32 Browning Ave 6-Transit 81 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 34M1 34M2 43 682064' N 79 352489° W NY NY_OSC29137 Pole 2901 Bayview Ave 6-Transil 82 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 51M21 51M8 NY NY_0SC48803 Pole 1622 Sheppard Ave E 6-Transil 83 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 5668F7 SS68F2 NY NY_0SC39850 Pole 334 Wilmington Ave 6-Transit 85 SOC 5801 OH Scotch 27 6 Kv 85M6 43 76911° N 79 46046° W 196 in NY NY_0SC96756 Pole 85 Dufflaw Rd 6-Transit 86 SOC 5801 OH Svritch 27 6 KV 35M23 43° 43 18 . N 79° 27 77 W 179 NY NY_OSC7353 Pole 363 Senlac Rd 6-Transit 87 SSC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 8M1 43° 46 517 N 79' 25 773' W 19 NY NY_0SC47012 Pole 479 Cummer Ave 6-Transit 88 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 80M4 80M21 43' 47 5117 N 79° 23 687 W 180 NY NY_0SC59025 Pole 2558 Bayview Ave 6-Transit 89 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 531,421 NY NY_OSC55509 Pole 23 Ernest Ave 6-Transit 90 SSC 5801 01-1 Switch 27 6 KV SS68F3 5568F9 NY NY_0SC928213 Pole 2126 Bayview Ave 6-Transit 91 58.0 5801 OH Svntch 27.6 KV 34M7 NY NY_0SC33749 Pole 698 Sheppard Ave E 6-Transit 92 56C 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 80M5 51M7 NY NY_0SC52670 Pole 3350 Victoria Park Ave 6-Transit 93 SOC 5801 OH SvAtch 27E KV 51M32 51M4 NY NY_0SC88301 Pole 2230 Victoria Park Ave 6-Transit 94 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV S3M26 NY NY_OSC91960 Pole 5025 Leslie SI 6-Transit 96 56.0 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV SS68F1 93 48 25' N 79' 22 223 W 161 8 NY NY_0SC73096 Pole 96 Post Rd 6-Transit 97 SOC 5801 OH Switch 276 KV 51M21 53M24 43° 44 344' N 79° 22 094' W 155 7528 NY NY_OSC 28922 Pole 851 Dolomite Dr 6-Transit 98 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M6 NY NY_OSC12207 Pole 42-19 888 Don Mills Rd 6-Transit 100 SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 34M6 55M27 NY NY_0SC74736 Pole 3502 Don Mills Rd 6-Transit 102 SOC 5801 OH SwIch 27 6 KV 51M26 43.7931288 79 355189° W 165 43

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Lamed 03-2011-0120 Interrogatories Responses Tab 5.1 Schedule 15 NY NY_0SC64725 Pole 851 Willowdale Ave 6-Transit 103 &AC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 80M6 43' 782997 N 79° 407581' W 130 Attachment 2 NY NY_OSC52475 Pole 3504 Don Mills Rd 6-Transit 104 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 51M26 43.793547° N 79 355160° W 165 rn Page 7 of 11 NY NY_0SC44526 Pole 228 Van Horne Ave 6-Transit 105 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 51M24 51M213 43 78766° N 79.3510867 W 103 0 0 NY NY_0SC36739 Pole 517 Kenneth Ave 6-Transit 105 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 80M3 80M5 43 06.931' N 79 44 783 W NY NY_0SC38702 Pole 77 Norton Ave 6-Transit 107 SaC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 80M3 801422 43° 46 371 N 79" 24.563 W 188 NY 811'_05C52702 Pole 19 Churchill Ave 6-TranSit 108 SAC 5801 OH SvAlch 27 6 KV 80M22 417734200 N 79,4153707 W 153 NY NY_0SC1436 Pole 865-2-1 Don Mills Rd, CPR R016-Transit 109 69/C 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV S3M27 531411 43 7256°N 79 3392° W 146 NY NY_0SC67692 Pole 3924 Victoria Park Ave 6-Transit 110 SSC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 51M27 43 813807° N 79 340271° W 185 Scar SC_0SC56394 Pole 3911 Victoria Park Ave 6-Transil 111 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 502M28 43 812618' N 79 339826° W 274 Tor T0_0SC77986 Pole 124 Eglinton Ave W 6-Transit 113 SAC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV 6220DX 43° 42 199' N 79° 24 922' W 153 NY 0 NY_P5C7236 4150 Yonge St 14/0 York Mills 6-Transit 114 DART PMH-9 27 6 KV 80M27 43 44 806 NI 79° 24 455 W 119 NY NY_OSC98867 Pole 39 Tarnworth Rd 6-Transit 115 SSC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 8M9 NY NY_05C23506 Pole 72 Lesrnill Rd 6-Transit 116 SAC 5801 OH Swirah 27 6 KV 511423 531428 43 758202° N 79 356793' W 238 NY NY_0SC21189 Pole 2872 Victoria Park Ave 6-Transit 117 SSC 5801 OH Svrach 27.6 KV 51M25 43 792418° N 79 331558° W 129 in NY NY_OSC64990 Pole 2465 Steeles Ave E 6-Transil 119 SSC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 51M3 511427 43 810740° N 79362030° W 190 0 NY NY_0SC25791 Pole 91 Willowdale Ave 6-Transit 122 Sti.0 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 80M29 43 45 761' N 79° 23 948' W 173 NY NY_05C82163 Pole 237 Shaunnessy Blvd 6-Transit 124 SAC 5801 OH Switch 13.8 KV 566805 43 784271° N 79 35646E W 130 NY NY_05C396113 POle 12 De Quincy Blvd 6-Transit 125 SSC 5801 OH SvaIch 27 6 KV 85M26 85M5 43' 44.425 N 79° 26.179' W 184 Elob_YK YK_05C97076 Pole 53 The Belt Line 6-Transit 126 SAC 5801 OH SvAfah 27 6 KV 35M5 35M6 43° 42.217 N 79' 25.220 W 194 NY NY_0SC83601 Pole 2763 Bayview Ave 6-Transit 127 SA4 5901 OH Snatch 276 KV 51M21 41761361° N 793136567° W 167 NY NY_PSC45390 50 Denlow Blvd 6-Transit 129 DART PMH-9 27 6 KV 53M24 51M30 43 74546 79 36321 131 NY NY_00075954 Pole 2076 Bayview Ave 6-Transit 130 S8/C 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 34M7 34M5 43,719115° N 79 378593° W 103 30 NY_03C11709 Pole 1216 Sheppard Ave E 6-Transit 131 68/C 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 51M7 43.771606° N 79 366891° W 56 m NY NY_0SC283713 Pole 851 York Mills Rd 6-Transit 132 SSC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 51M30 53M28 43.753913° N 79.354503° W 131 NY NY_05C3735 Pole 11 Underinll Dr 5-Transit 133 SAX 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 53M25 43.702018° N 79 325303° W 123 NY NY_0SC78646 Pole 2764-12 Leslie Railway 6-Transit 134 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 51M7 43 766721 ° N 79 365250' W 108 NY NY_05C5668 Pole 73 Banbury Rd 6-Transit 136 SSC 5801 OH Switch 27_6 KV 531424 43 739256° N 79 366048*W 149 m NY NY_05C46631 Pole 3748 Keele St 6-Transit 139 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M24 85M4 430 45 491' N 79' 29 38E W 217 NY NY_0SC53454 Pole 76 Bond Ave 6-Transit 142 SA.0 5801 OH Snatch 27.6 KV 511430 53M10 41745379° 79 350712° 137 NY NY_0SC70236 Pole 1863 Leslie St 6-Transit 143 SAO 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 51M3O 531,124 41753321° N 79 359954° W 197 NY 14Y_05C19185 Pole 36 Bogert Ave 6-Transit 144 SAC 5801 OH Snatch 27 6 KV 85M27 8011423 43 760385° N 79412829° W 202 NY NY_0SC48471 Pole 885 York Mills Rd 6-Transit 145 SF.0 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 53M29 511429 43 755241° N 79 348560° W 98 NY NY_05084704 Pole 240 Duncan Mill Rd 6-Transit 147 SSC 5801 OH SwItch 27 6 KV 51M23 51M29 43.7615960 6 79.350937 0 W 102 rn NY NY_0SC67980 Pole 3324 Bayview Ave 6-Transit 148 68.0 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 80M6 BOWS 43.791714° N 79 393442" W 198 NY NY_OSC.56690 Pole 2 Laredo Cd 6-Transit 149 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 80M5 51M5 43 795840° N 79 399542° W 174 rn NY NY_0SC23846 Pole 91 Norton Ave 6-Transit 150 94C 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 80M3 80M6 NY NY_PSC61372 150 Beecroh Ave 6-Transit 151 S.SC 5801 PMH-9 27 6 KV 851427 813M24 43 764883' N 79 415200" W 370 NY NY_0SC26003 Pole 819 York Mills Rd 6-Transit 152 SSO 5801 OH Swnch 27.6 KV 51 M30 43 75325° N 79 3575° W 152 NY NY_OSC42196 Pole 82 Parkwoods Village Dr 6-Transit 153 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV NY 14Y_0SC19305 Pole 59 Old Sheppard Ave 6-Transit 154 SALO 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV 65613F7 43° 46 672' N 79° 20 214' W 181 NY NY_OSC38815 Pole 1103 Finch Ave W 6-Transit 155 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M31 43 76733' N 79.47344' W 32 NY NY_0SC22678 Pole 61 Curnrner Ave 6-Transit 157 SSC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 80M4 NY NIY_0SC26536 Pole 807 Lawrence Ave E 6-Transit 158 68.0 5801 OH Smich 27 6 KV 34M6 53M25 43.734407 0 N 79 354752° W 232 NY NY_0SC19199 Pole 808-0 Lawrence Ave E 6-Transit 159 68.0 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 34M5 34M6 43.7348230 NI 79 354868. W 147 Scar SC_05016891 Pole 3635 Steeles Ave E 6-Transil 161 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 502M21 43 818197° N 79 331048° W 307 in Scar SC_05C22543 Pole 3260 Pharmacy Ave 6-Transit 164 68-C 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 5521428 43 803209° N 79 330191° W 182 in NY NY_05C87704 Pole 11 Cuindier Ave 6-Transit 165 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 80M4 43,787093° N 79416904" W 182 rn S80 SpeedNet radio unlicense freq. 902 - 928 Mhz, NY NY_0SC44438 Pole 17 Wilmington Ave SpeedNet i 10 244.1.1 SAX 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M1 43° 45.210'N 79 . 27 165' W 166 NY NY_0SO8354 Pole 194 Wilson Ave SpeedNel •113.244.1,1i SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 135M8 43" 44 374' N 79" 25 405 W 162 NY NY_OSC70691 Pole 2111 Avenue Rd SpeedNet 110.244 1 1 56.0 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV asms 135M23 43' 44.275' N 790 25 24T W 187 NY NY_0SC23592 Pole 110 Wilson Ave SpeedNel /10 244 1 1 SEX 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M8 43' 44 463 N 790 25 11' W 163 NY NY_05C1019 Pole 4022 Yonge St SpeedNet 110 244 1 1 68/C 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 85M8 80M27 NY NY_OSC13420 Pole 3690 DuHenn SI SpeedNel t 10 244 1 1 , SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 65M10 43" 43 979' N 79" 27 557 W 199 NY NY_0SC72133 Pole 3686 Duffenn SI SpeedNet 110,244 1.1 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M10 85749 43' 43 971' N 79° 27 54A W 199 NY NY_OSC7890 Pole 182 Regent Rd SpeedNet 110 244.1 1•S&C 5801 OH Switch 276 KV 85M10 43' 43 834' N 79° 28 295' W 19 NY NY_0SC79792 Pole 1077 Wilson Ave SpeedNet •10 244.1 1 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M10 85M25 43" 43 617 N 79° 28 867' W 194 NY NY_0SC91140 Pole 1865 Avenue Rd SpeedNet 110 244 1 1.68C 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 85M23 434 43 915 N 79 0 25 150 W 115 NY NY_OSO88314 Pole 254 Faywood Blvd SpeedNet 110 244.1 2 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 65M1 43° 45 010' N 79 27 004' W 190 NY NY_OSC44472 Pole 1581 Avenue Rd SpeedNel ■ 10 244 1 2iSAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M23 NY NY_0SC85941 Pole 308 Lawrence Ave W SpeedNet 110 244 1 2 68.0 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M23 35M5 43° 43 335 N 79 24974' W 118 NY NY_0SC55286 Pole 2992 Keele SI SpeedNet t 10 244.1.2' S/AC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M25 43' 44 203' 79° 29 069' 195 NY NY_0SC90796 Pole 2854 Keele SI SpeedNet 110 244 1 2 SaC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M25 43° 43 895 N 79' 29 005 W 195 NY NY_05C73743 Pole 1111 Wilson Ave SpeedNet 110.244 1 2, SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M25 430 43 580' N 79° 28 975' W 206 NY NY_0SC15257 Pole 1220 Wilson Ave SpeedNet 110.244 1 2 SAC 5601 OH Swach 27 KV 55M28 85M25 43' 43 496' N 79° 29 405 W 174 NY NY_0S080757 Pole 5 Ranee Ave SpeedNet 110244.1.2 SAX 5801 OH Snatch 27 6 KV 851426 43' 43 609 N 79° 25 917 W 202 NY NY_0SC32360 Pole 139 Ranee Ave SpeedNet 810 244 1 2.94C 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 85M26 43. 43 495 NI 79° 26 443 W 175 NY NY_05C565 Pole 259 Ranee Ave (S725) SpeedNet 110 244 1 2. 93C 5801 OH SvAtch 27 6 KV 85M26 35817 NY NY_0SC83748 Pole 144 Faywood Blvd SpeedNet 110 244 1 3 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M1 43° 44.561 N 79° 26 908' W 191 NY NY_OSC18706 0 Pole 3048 Dufferin St SpeedNet 110 244 1 3169.0 5901 OH Switch 27 6 KV 35M3 43° 42.815' N 79 29 29 W 119 NY NY_0SC85887 Pole 7 Orton Rd SpeedNet 110.244.1 3 SSC 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 35M3 35M23 NY 6'1_05075577 Pole 3296 Duffenn St SpeedNet 110,244 1.1 SAC 5001 OH Switch 27.6 KV 35M3 43° 41271 N 79' 27 38W W 192 NY NY_OSC5305 Pole 176 Bentworth Ave SpeedNet 110.244 1 1 680 5801 OH Snatch 27 6 KV B5M9 35M3 NY NY_OSC879 Pole 9 Glen Park Ave SpeedNel t 10 244 1 3.SfiC 5801 OH Snatch 27 6 KV 35M5 43' 42 782' N 79° 25 747' W 182 NY NY_05C90200 Pole 2787 Bathurst St SpeedNet 110.244 1.1 SAC 5801 CH Snatch 27 6 KV 35M5 43° 42 714' N 79 25 679 W 186 NY NY_OSC61721 Pole 2895 Bathurst St SpeedNet 110 244 1.3 S8,C 5801 OH Swach 27 6 KV 35M5 NY NY_OSC88300 Pale 3077 Bathurst St SpeedNet 110 244 1 3.68.0 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 35M5 355111 NY NY_05C48846 Pale 764 Marine Ave SpeedNel 110 244 1 3/68,C 5801 OH Snatch 27 6 KV 351411 43.715457' N 79 446259° W 178 NY NY_0SC93009 Pole 532 Wilson Ave SpeedNet 110.244 1 4 SF.0 5801 OH SkAtch 27.6 KV 85M1 135M26 43 ° 44 097 N 79' 26 758' W 173 NY NY_0SC2874 Pole 546 Lawrence Ave SpeedNet 110 204 1 4 1 68.0 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 35M11 43' 43 111 14 79° 25 99A W 198 NY NY_03C631135 Pole 3089 Bathurst St SpeedNel 110 244 1 4 SSC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 3511 43' 43 221 79' 25 799' W 191 NY NY_0SC85768 Pole 228 Wilson Ave SpeedNel i 192441.4.68C 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 65M8 NY NY_0SC13613 Pole 230 Wilson Ave SpeedNet 110/44.1.4 SAC 5801 OH Snatch 27.6 KV 85M6 85M23 NY NY_05056669 Pole 2 Murray Rd SpeedNet 110 2441 4- Se.0 5801 OH SvAtch 27 6 KV 85M10 43° 43 781' N 79° 28 314'1Y 187 NY Ny_0SC4794 Pole 393 Brooke Ave SpeedNel 110.244.1 4. 68.0 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 85M23 43' 43 945' N 79' 25 83 W 119 NY NY_0SC38741 0 Pole 403 Brooke Ave SpeedNel 110 244.1.4.68C 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M23 43 43 829' N 79' 25.905' W 199 NY NY_05C17651 Pole 3320 Keele St SpeedNet 110 244 1.4 SAC 5801 Oki Switch 27 6 KV 85M25 43' 44.658' N 79° 29 191' W 175 NY NY_OS08071 0 Pole 1423 Sheppard Ave W SpeedNet 110 244.1,4SOC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 55M25 851425 43 44 678' N 79° 29 221' W 191 NY NY_0SC5958 Pole 60 De Quincy Blvd SpeedNet irS. 244 1.4.58.0 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 85N476 NY NY_OS01484 Pole 4117 Bathurst St SpeedNet 10 244 1.5 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M5 NY NY_05088040 Pole 191 Brooke Ave SpeedNet 119244 1 51SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M23 801■13 43° 44.020' N 79 25 045 W 164 NY NY_0SC96144 Pole 2677 Bathurst St SpeedNel 110 244 1.5 SAC 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 35145 35M6 Tor S5466 Pole 3 Teddington Pk SpeedNet 110 244.1.5 SAC 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV A230GL Tor 55792 Pole 2 Melrose SpeedNet 1102441.5 68.0 5801 OH Switch 13 8 KV A240GL 44

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited E0-2011-0120 Interrogatories Responses Tab 5.1 Schedule 15 NY NY_05C94709 Pole 3883 Bathurst SI SpeedNet it!) 244.1.6 S&C 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 85M5 Attachment 2 NY NY_OSC2820 Pole 3781 Bathurst St (S328) SpeedNet 110.244.1 7 S&C 5801 OH Switch 27.6 KV 85M26 85M5 Page 8 of 11 NY NY_0SC28388 Pole 3557 Bathurst St SpeedNet 110.244.1.8 S&C 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M5 NY NY_05C4472 Pole 3285 Bathurst St SpeedNel 110.244.1.9 S&C 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M5 35M11 Slob EH_OSC 11473 Pole 2 Old Park Rd SpeedNet r' 10.244 1.! S&C 5801 OH Switch 27 6 KV 35M4 35M6 1 Pole 197 Faywood Ave SpeedNel radio 43.74659 -79 44912 2 Pole 72 FaywoOd Aye SpeedNet radio 43.73842 -79 44738 3 Pole 537 Wilson Ave SpeedNet radio 43 73464 -79.44641 4 Pole 002 Wilson Ave on Lat/LOng; 10 SpeedNet radio 43 73615 .79 44085 Pole 3 Transit Rd 114/W Cor @ 5 Wilson) Conc, OIL Pole SpeedNer radio 43.73331 -79 45323 6 Pole 100 Regent Rd SpeedNet radio 43.73194 7946566 7 Pole 973 Wilson Ave (5/5), 5/0 Corny SpeedNet radio 43 72845 -79 47618 9 Pofe 3535 Dufferin WE Cor. @ BIlly E SpeedNet radio 43 72998 .79 45827 10 Pole 121 Ranee Ave SpeedNet radio 43 72219 -7945241 11 Pole 85 Ranee Ave (S/S, W/O Rajah) SpeedNet radio 43 72572 79 43671 12 Pole 752 Lawrence Ave W (Cons SA SpeedNet radio 43 71501 -79 44953 13 Pole 606 Lawrence Ave W (N/5), 0/0 SpeedNet radio 4171683 .79_44095 14 Pole 3045 Bathurst 51, 5/0 Lawrence SpeedNel radio 43 71918 -79,42982 15 Pole 448 Lawrence Ave W @ WellaniSpeedNet radio 43 72011 -79.42634 16 Pole 365 Brooke Ave @ Falkirk SpeedNet radio 43 73112 .79.42854 17 Pole 36 Brooke Ave @ Clyde SpeedNet radio 4173202 -79 42422 18 Pole 1795 Avenue Rd, WO Melrose SpeedNet radio 43 73014 -79.41874 19 Pole 250 Wilson Ave @ Allard SpeedNet radio 4173767 -79 42945 20 Pole 2160 Avenue Road SpeedNet radio I 43.73988 .79.42149 21 Pole 68 Wilson Ave, 5/0 Young 8Ivd SpeedNet radio 43.74196 -79.41299 22 Pole 902 Sheppard Ave W SpeedNet radio 43.75192 -79.4557 Pole 3750 Bathurst St & Wilson Ave 23 (51W Cor ) SpeedNel radio 43.73731 -79 43403 24 Pole 706 Marlee Ave @ Glengrove SpeedNet radio 43 71063 7944047 25 Pole 300 Marlee Ave @ Ernst SpeedNet radio 43 .70622 -79,44277 26 Pole 44 Marlee Ave (N/W Cot.) @ RoSpeedNet radio 43 70218 -79.44121 27 Pole 3222 Keele St SpeedNet radio 43 74076 -79 48557 28 Pole 006 Bentworth Ave (110691 @ I SpeedNet radio 4369923 -79.43371 29 Pole 10612.7 Sheppard Ave W SpeedNet radio 43,75005 -79A6563 30 Pole X Carl 14all Rd 6/0 John Derry Dr SpeedNet radio 4174654 -79.48103 31 Pole 2740 Bathurst St SpeedNel radio 43.7099 -79 42773 32 Pole 724 Lawrence Ave W (Cons 5/1 Speedhlet radio 43.71562 -79 44646 34 Pole 3423 Duffenn 51 E/S @ Jane Osh SpeedNet radio 43 72479 -79.45703 35 Pole 30, Melrose Ave SpeedNet radio 4176632 -79.45923 36 Pole 167 Wilmington Ave (0/5), 5/0 I SpeedNet radio 43 76084 -79_45603 37 Pole 950 Roselawn Ave (N/5), 6/0 Da SpeedNel radio 4170183 -79 44337 38 4 Forest Laneway (Condo building) SpeedNet radio 43.76114 .79 451044 40 3077 Weston Rd (Condo building) SpeediNet radio 43.732189 -79.537582 Bathurst Station 176 Goddard Street (substa)ion) SpeedNet radio Fairbank Station 950 Roselawn (substation SpeedNel radio 41 Pole 32 Old Park road SpeedNet radio 43.70373 -79.43254 Slob Master Darcom radio 330 Dixon Rd DARCOM MOSCAD radio hub Elob EH_MONO 6 Mongrarn point to point to 330 Dixc DARCOM MOSCAD Slob EH ANNA I Annabelle Dr DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Bob 61-1_LONG 1 Longfield Rd DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob EH_BLAK 395 The East Mall DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 13.8 KV Elob El-LOONS 367 Carlingwew Dr DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 13 8 KV Etob EH_ENTE 74 Leading Rd DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 13 8 KV Elob EH_HLIN 267 Hurnbeitine Dr DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 13 8 KV Elob EH_INDE 21 Manstor Rd DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 13.8 KV Etob El-i_MARM 25 McLachlan Dr DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 13 8 KV Etob EH_METE 139 Cartingview Or DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 13 8 KV Bob EH_PALM 360 The West Mall DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 13 8 KV Etob El-f_SHER 25 The West Mall (Plaza) DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 13 8 KV Blob EH_WALN 510 The West Ma)l DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 13.8 KV Elob EH_WMOR 127 Westrnore Dr DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 13.8 KV Etob EH_WOOD 500 Rexdale Blvd DARCOM MOSCAD customer 13 8 KV Etob EFLOSC10293 Pole 2200 Hurnberhne Dr DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 29N136 Etola EH_OSC10447 Pole 31 Legion Rd DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 30M8 Elob EH_OSC10670 Pole 787 The Queensway DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27.6 KV 38M13 38M12 Etob EM_OSC11099 Pole 440 Kipling Ave DARCOM MOSCAD 01-1 SwItch 27.6 KV 30M9 Elob EH_OSC11169 Pole 115 Skyway Ave DARCOM MOSCAID OH Switch 27 6 KV 88M44 Etob EM_OSC11208 Pole 462 Dixon Rd DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 88M18 Etob EH_OSC120131 Pole 659 Kipling Ave DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 38M4 Etob EH_O5C12617 Pole 1676 Martin Grove Rd DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27.6 KV 29M33 6106 EH_OSC12642 Pole 60-A Guided Cr1 DARCOM MOSCAD CH Swish 27 6 KV D6M4 29M35 Etob EH_OSC13015 Pole 3747 Lakeshore Blvd DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 30M5 30M10 Elob EH_OSC13047 Pole 1122 Islington Ave DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 38M5 151M16 Etob EFLOSC13535 Pole 110 Vulcan St DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27.6 KV 88M43 Blob EH_0SC13747 Pole 4441 Eglinton Ave W DARCOIN MOSCAD OH Switch 27.6 KV 88M15 Etob EH_OSC13959 Pole 4631 Eglinton Ave W DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 518M46 Etob EH_OSC150 Pole 2337 Kipling Ave DARCOM MOSCAO OH Switch 27 5 KV 29M3 Etob EH_OSC1516 Pole 213 Bering Ave DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 38M7 38M24 Etob Eli_OSC1518 Pole 462 Rathburn Rd DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 813M45 Eta EH_OSC15450 Pole 1 Penlea Ave DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27.6 KV 29M4 Etob EH_OSC1582 Pole 24 Princess Margaret HONI RO DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27.6 KV 38M1 88M13 Etob Eli_OSC16011 Pole 4081 Eglinton Ave W DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27.6 KV 881■415 Blob EFLOSC16293 Pole 414 Rexdale Blvd DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 29M1 29M2 glob EH_0SC16303 Pole 551 Royal York Rd DARCOM MOSCAD 01-1 Switch 27 6 KV 38M13 30M1 Etob EH_OSC16986 Pole 1992 Martin Grove Rd DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 29M34 29M5 Elob EH_OSC 17629 Pole 6 Evans Ave DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 30M7 38M21 Elob EH_0SC17900 Pole 145 Evans Ave DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 30M1 Blob EH_OSC18109 Pole 2750 Islington Ave DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 551N4 Etob 61-1_0SC21308 Pole 1738 Islington Ave DARCOM MOSCAD OH Swach 27.6 KV 88M15 881013 Elob EH_0SC21905 Pole 108 Neilson Dr DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 38M23 Blob Eli_0SC22666 Pole 6767 Sleeles Ave W DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27.6 KV 06M1 Etob EH_OSC24013 Pole 205 Carrier Dr DARCOM MOSCAD OH SwIch 27.6 KV D6M4 29M36 Etob EI-LOSC2437 Pole 270 Dixon Rd DARCOM MOSCAD 014 Switch 27 6 KV 88M17 45

Toronto HyclroiElectric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatories Responses Tab 5 1 Schedule 15 Etob EH_0SC78347 Pole 7066 HWy 6 27 DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27.6 KV 29M2 Attachment 2 Etob EFI_OSC79171 Pole 11 Bethndge Rd DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 88M1 Page 10 of 11 Elob EH_OSC80158 Pole 270 Carlingview Dr DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27.6 KV 88M2 Etats EH_0SC80306 Pole 6902 Hwy # 27 DARCOM MOSCAD OH SMIch 27 6 KV 29M2 88M8 Etch EH_OSC8146 Pole 197 Royal York Rd DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27.6 KV 3M4 3M9 Etob EH_OSC81817 Pole 905 Dixon Rd OARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27.6 KV 88M2 Etob EH_OSC824 Pole 3481 Lakeshore Blvd DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 30M5 Elob EH_OSC82549 Pole 2255 Islington Ave DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 29M5 55146 Etob EFLOSC83124 Pole 1892 Islington Ave DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27.6 KV 88M15 885417 Etob EFLOSC8360 Pole 2 HONI ROW, Rear 2 Westrose DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27.6 KV 38547 Elob EH_O5C84334 Pole 1 Royalcrest Rd DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27.6 KV 29M35 Etob EH_OSC85025 Pole 2094 Marlin Grove Rd DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 29M34 Etob EH_OSC85412 Pole 255 Royal York Rd DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 3648 3M4 Elob EH_0SC85543 Pole 2760 Lakeshore Blvd DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27.6 KV 30M9 Etob EH_OSC85912 Pole 274 Carlingview Dr DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 276 KV 88M11 88M2 Etob EH_0SC8681 Pole 8 Manstor Rd DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 38M23 38M25 Elob EH_0SC87281 Pole 518 Rathburn Rd OARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 885445 Etob EH_OSC138969 Pole 1325 Marlin Grove Rd DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27.6 KV 29M33 Etob EH_OSC89050 Pole 586 Scarlett Rd DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27.6 KV 138M18 86M15 Etob EH_OSC89248 Pole 45.2 The West Mall DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27.6 KV 38M23 Etob EH_0SC90416 Pole 1270 Islington Ave DARCOM MOSCAD OH Svntch 27 6 KV 38M16 Etat, EH_OSC91394 Pole 2285 Ishngton Ave DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 55M6 Etob EH_OSC91565 Pole 260 Rest:tale Blvd DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 88M1 29M33 Etob EH_OSC91608 Pole 29 Coney Rd DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27.6 KV 38M3 38M2 Elob EH_OSC92474 Pole 2135 Kipling Ave DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 29M3 Elob EH_OSC92813 Pole 82 The West Mall DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 38M25 Etob EH_OSC9297 Pole 1311 Martin Grove Rd DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 88M14 295433 Mob EH_OSC93103 Pole 126 The Oueensway DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27.6 KV 30542 38M13 Elob EH_OSC9320 Pole 830 Burnharnthorpe Rd DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27.6 KV 88M46 88M45 Etob EH_0SC9343 Pole 160 New Toronto SI DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 30M4 Dols EIH_OSC93935 Pole 428 Mill Rd DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 885446 Etob EH_OSC94501 Pole 350 Humber-line Dr DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 29M6 Elob EFI_OSC95041 Pole 4515 Eglinton Ave W DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27.6 KV 88M13 Etob EH_OSC97424 Pole 113 North Queen St DARCOM MOSCAD Oki Switch 27.6 KV 36M25 Etob EH_OSC99568 Pole 5 McLachlan Dr DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27.6 KV 88M6 Etob EH_0SC99532 Pole 50 Northqueen St DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27.6 KV 38M6 38M25 Etat] EH_OSC99139 Pole 1730 Kipling Ave DARCOM MOSCAD OH Switch 27 6 KV 88M17 88M16 Elob EH_ALBI 2 Rampart Rd DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob Eli_ALLE 2310 Islington Ave DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob EH_ASHL 1179 Royal York Rd DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob EH_BELF 121 Belfield Rd DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etch EH_BELL 10 Beltrnan Ave DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob EH_BLAC 95 Blackfriar Blvd DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Bob Eli_BRAE 15 Arcot Blvd DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob Eli_BROW 756 Browns Line DARCOM MOSCAO Substation 4 KV Etob Ell_BURL 16 Burhngarne Rd DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob EH_BURN 790 Burnharnthorpe Rd DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etch EH_CEOR Rear 18 Bell Royal Gil DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Elob EIH_CENT 56 Centennial Park Rd DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob EH_CHAL 196 Beihndge Rd DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob EH_CHAP 20 Trehorne Dr DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob EH_DALE 59 Dategrove Cres DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Elob EH_DELA 2094 Martin Grove Rd DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Elob EH_DUNS 64 Dunsany Cres DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob EH_EDEN 294 Scartell Rd DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob Ell_ELMH 2 Elmhurst Dr DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob EH_FIEL 61 Fieldway Rd DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Elob EH_GUNT 39 Gunton Dr DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob Ekl_HARD 33 Hardwick Crt DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob EH_HART 191 The Westway DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob EH_HBAY 70 Cannon Rd DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Elob EH_HIGH 18 Warbeck PI DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Elob EH_HOLL SIO 1285 The Queensway DARCOM MOSCA0 Substation 4 KV Etob EH_HUNT 63 Hunting Ridge DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob EN_INVE 913 Islington Ave DARCOM MOSCAD Substatton 0 KV Elob Ell_KING 318 Prince Edward Dr OARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Elob EFI_LAMB 110A Westrose Ave DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob EH_MOUN 746 Scarlett Rd DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob EH_NEIL 4237 Bloor SI W DARCOM MOSCAD Substabon 4 KV Etob Eli_NORS 1066 Islington Ave DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob EH_OBER B Newell Cn DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob EH_PORT 2 Guiness Ave DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob Eli_RATH 395 Rathburn Rd DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob EH_RAVE 1720 Islington Ave DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Eta EH_REDC 2130 Kipling Ave DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob EH_RENF 40 Tornngton Dr DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Elob EN_ROSE 1442 Islington Ave DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Rob EH_ROYA 4236 Marbn Grove Rd DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob EH_SHAV 78 Shaver Ave S DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Elob EH_TAYS 153 Taysham Cres DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob EH_THIS 55 Thistletown Blvd DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etc], EIH_THOR 59 Glen Agar Dr DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob EFI_TIDE 307 Rexdale Blvd DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Eli:lb EH_WATE 40A Waterchtte Rd DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Slob EH_WIND 298 Dixon Rd DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etch EH_WING 27 Wingrove Hill DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob Eli_WISL 55 Ashbourne Dr DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etob EH_WMOU 174 Dixon Rd DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Etat, ER_YORK 714 Royal York Rd S DARCOM MOSCAD Substation 4 KV Tx UHF master radio 6 Forest Laneway BOW 417.6375 Rx. 412 6375 NY NY_0SC68582 Pole 5 Raitherm Rd NY radio BOW OH Switch 27.6 KV 35M8 NY NY_O5C94852 Pole 2731 Keefe St NY racho BOW OH Switch 27 6 KV 355424 85M25 NY NY_0SC59202 Pole 72 Highland HSI NY radio BOW OH Switch 27 6 KV 35M7 NY NY_OSC10580 Pole 151 Barlor Rd NY radio BOW OH Switch 27 6 KV 55M21 46

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited E8.2011-0120 Interrogatories Responses Tab 5.1 Schedule 15 Attachment 2 Page 11 0011

NY NY_0SC10615 Pole 126 Overland Dr NY radio BOW OH Switch 276 KV 34M5 NY NY_0SC14319 Pole 39 The Donway E NY radio BOW OH Switch 27 6 KV NY NY_O5C14544 Pole 183 Railside Rd NY radio BOW OH Switch 27.6 KV 53M25 53M8 NY NY_OSC26527 Pole 2 Milvan Dr NY radio BOW OH Switch 27 6 KV 55M27 55M9 NY NY_OSC28163 Pole 1546 Wilson Ave NY radio BOW OH Switch 27.6 KV 55M28 NY NY_0S0361364 Pole 1023 Caledonia Rd NY radio BOW OH Switch 27 6 KV 35M12 NY NY_OSC4163 Pole 140 Shaughnessy Blvd NY radio BOW OH Switch 27 6 KV SS6875 SS68F2 NY NY_OSC43532 Pole 143 HONI ROW, Approx 3621 NY radio BOW OH Switch 27 6 KV 01M27 NY NY_0SC43742 Pole 1082 York Mills Rd NY radio BOW OH Swnch 27.6 KV 53M25 51M29 NY NY_0SC4420 Pole 160 Cactus Ave NY radio BOW OH Switch 276 KV 8M10 8M2 NY NY_0SC48240 Pole 539 Finch Ave W NY radio BOW OH Switch 27.6 KV 8M8 NY NY_OSC51878 Pale 3 Jethro Rd NY radio BOW OH Switch 27.6 KV 55M26 NY NY_OSC58792 Pole 251 Brooke Ave NY radio BOW OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M23 NY NY_00062576 Pole 557 Alness SI NY radio BOW OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M2 NY NY_0SC63084 Pole 2257 Sheppard Ave W NY radio BOW OH Switch 27 6 KV 55M29 NY NY_OSC6363 Pole 4 Ashwarren Rd NY radio BOW OH Switch 27.6 KV 85M24 NY NY_OSC690213 Pole 18 Oakdale Rd NY radio BOW OH Switch 27 6 KV 55M26 NY NY_OSC69414 Pole 323 Churchill Ave NY radio BOW OH Switch 27 6 KV 85M27 8M1 NY NY_OSC74876 Pole 2937 Fairview Mall Dr, Rear 56 NY radio BOW OH Switch 27 6 KV SS68F9 NY NY_0SC76074 Pole 534 Signet Dr NY radio BOW OH Switch 27.6 KV 55M1 55M32 NY NY_OSC713931 Pole 55 Tycos Dr NY radio BOW OH Switch 27.6 KV 35M8 NY NY_OSC13151313 Pole 1649 Jane 51 NY radio BOW Ohl Switch 27 6 KV 11M4 NY NYI0SC85456 Pole 21 Johnston Ave NY radM BOW OH Switch 27 6 KV 8M3 NY NY_0SC92100 Pole 2394 Finch Ave W NY radio BOW OH Switch 27 6 KV 55M9 NY NY_PS080063 245 Consumers Rd NY radio BOW OH Switch 276 KV 51M4 NY NY_OSC46432 Pole 216 Milvan Dr NY radio BOW OH Switch 27.6 KV 55M22 NY NY_0SC75500 Pole 5661 Steeles Ave W NY radio BOW OH Switch 27 6 KV 55M31 55M22 NY NY_S180 Pole 4250 Dutierin St NY radio BOW OH Switch 276 KV 85M4 NY NY_PSC111354-SC1 1185 Eglinton Ave E (PSC11854) NY radio BOW PAD 27.6 KV 53M1 53M5 NY NY_P5056496-SC1 4828 Leshe St, Opp Van Home NY radio BOW PAD 27.6 KV 51M6 NY NY_IBMV2 245 Consurners Rd, IBM Bldg (DXJ) NY radio BOW Vault 27 6 KV NY NY_JJL-SC2 1020 Lawrence Ave W (JJL) MinpRis NY radio BOW Vault 27 6 KV 35M24 NY NY_TWO-SC2 950 Lawrence Ave W (TWO) Mini-Ri NY radio BOW Vault 27 6 KV 35M23 47

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.3 Schedule 6 Filed: 2011 Oct 3 Page 1 of 1

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

INTERROGATORY 6:

2 Reference(s): none provided

3

4 (a) Please list all third parties that have any "non-distribution attachments" ("NDAs") on

5 THESL owned or controlled poles. For each third party, please include

6 (i) What type of wireless attachment is located on the poles

7 (ii) The total number of each type of wireless attachment located on the poles

8 (iii) The attachment rate, and all other applicable fees, paid by such third party

9 (iv) The permitted term of each wireless attachment 10 (v) Whether there are also wireline attachments associated with any of the

11 wireless attachments (vi) The number of associated wireline attachments

13 (vii) Any applicable agreements with such party that allows NDAs

14 (b) Please provide engineering drawings and specifications of all NDAs currently

15 attached to THESL poles.

16 (C) Explain how each type of NDA attached to THESL poles could have been attached to

17 alternative structures including, but not limited, buildings, cell towers, or other structures.

18 If they could not have been reasonably been attached, please explain why.

19 (d) Please provide engineering drawings and specifications of all non-wireline

20 attachments currently attached to THESL poles and the location of all such attachments

21 on THESL poles. For clarity, non-wireline attachments includes all equipment related to

22 or used in conjunction with wireline attachments such as power supplies, rectifiers, cable

23 TV boxes, etc.

24 (e) As it relates to Figure 2 of page 3 of the Appendix to the THESL Letter, please

25 provide: 48

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.3 Schedule 6 Filed: 2011 Oct 3 Page 2 of 2

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

(i) a list of all non-wireline (i.e. fibre, cable or other) NDAs attached to THESL 2 poles including: 3 A. The geographic location of each NDA 4 B. The specific type of NDA attachment (e.g. surveillance camera, Wi-Fi 5 antenna, battery unit, DAS antenna, etc.) 6 C. The owner of each NDA 7 D. The size, weight, dimensions and other physical specifications of each 8 NDA 9 E. The attachment location on the pole of each NDA (distribution space, 10 communication space, unusable space, etc.) 11 F. The attachment method (e.g. through bolt, metal band, in-line (i.e. 12 on-cable), etc.)

13 14 RESPONSE:

15 (a)

16 TYPE TOTAL NUMBER Wireline 83,258 transit shelters 297 DAScom 105 wireless antennae rectifier 170 transit 443 49

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.3 Schedule 6 Filed: 2011 Oct 3 Page 3 of 3

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

equipment baskets, 1968 banners, lighting traffic signs and No Data signals, police cameras

2

3 Regarding (i) and (ii), see category labelled "DAScom wireless antennae" in the

4 above chart. Please see the response in Tab 5.1, Schedule 11.

5

6 Regarding (iii), the rate applied to telecommunications attachments on THESL

7 primary distribution Poles is $22.35. Others are not relevant to this proceeding,

8 and in any event, are confidential.

9

10 Regarding (iv), once the attachment is on a THESL Pole, the term of the

11 attachment is provided for in the agreement. All wireless attachments currently

12 on THESL primary distribution Poles are DAScom attachments, and THESL's

13 contract with DAScom provides that the term of the agreement continues through

14 midnight on December 31, 2014.

15

16 Regarding (v) and (vi), please see the responses in Tab 5.1, Schedule 16 and 27.

17

18 Regarding (vii), the information requested is not relevant to the current

50

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.3 Schedule 6 Filed: 2011 Oct 3 Page 4 of 4

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

1 proceeding, production of it is unduly onerous relative to its probative, and it is, in

2 any event, confidential.

3

4 (b) It is not possible for THESL to produce the requested information within the

5 timelines of this proceeding. In any event, production of such information in

6 unduly onerous relative to its probative value.

7

8 (c) THESL believes that wireless attachers have other alternatives available. See

9 evidence of Dr. Yatchew and Mr. Starkey. THESL is mandated to grant wireline

10 attachers access to THESL Poles pursuant to the CCTA Decision, which assumes

11 that such THESL Poles are an "essential facility" for those attachers. Other

12 NDAs are non-communications NDAs and are not relevant to this proceeding. In

13 any event, a more detailed response to this question would depend the

14 circumstances, and no particular facts or circumstances have been provided in this

15 interrogatory.

16

17 (d) It is not possible for THESL to produce the requested information within the

18 timelines of this proceeding. In any event, production of such information in 19 unduly onerous relative to its probative value.

20

21 (e) Please see the responses in Tab 5.1, Schedules 7 and 15.

51

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.1 Schedule 7 Filed: 2011 Sep 30 Page 1 of 3

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

INTERROGATORY 7:

2 Reference(s): Byrne, para. 4

3

4 Ms. Byrne states that "the configuration, condition and congestion of the THESL Poles 5 today is highly varied." 6 (a) How are legacy variations (i.e., different distribution configurations and varying 7 standards on poles) documented and tracked? 8 (b) What in THESL's view, is an acceptable level of congestion in respect of all "zones" 9 on a pole. 10 (c) Describe the basis upon which THESL relies to determine when a pole exceeds 11 acceptable levels of congestion. 12 (d) Provide a breakdown, in tabular form, for the THESL poles (140,000) and the THESI 13 poles to be transferred to THESL (40,000), that shows how many poles are at capacity in 14 terms of the acceptable level of congestion (described in (b)) and how many poles have 15 capacity available to accommodate new attachments. 16 (e) How is the age and condition of poles tracked and managed to ensure that poles are 17 replaced at the end of their useful life? 18 (f) If age, condition and congestion (loading) are not tracked on a pole by pole basis, 19 explain how THESL decides when to replace a pole? 20 (g) Does THESL visually inspect each pole before a decision is taken to replace it? If so, 21 how often are all 140,000 poles inspected?

22

23 RESPONSE: 24 (a) Legacy asset installations may be documented in construction drawings from the time 25 of the installation. There may also be documented Standards from the former

52

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.1 Schedule 7 Filed: 2011 Sep 30 Page 2 of 3

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

company. THESL asset information is contained in computer system databases and

2 programs, such as our geographical information system.

3

4 (b) The THESL Standards give the approved configurations for conductors or other items

5 installed on a pole.

6

7 (c) THESL follows its own Standards for construction in the ordinary course.

8

9 (d) THESL records for pole attachments, based on current invoicing, show:

10 Telecommunications: 83,662 pole attachments

11 Other commercial: 1,332

12

13 THESL does not have records that capture the specific number of attachments on

14 each given distribution pole, nor does it have precise records regarding the number of

15 traffic attachments, police cameras or temporary decorative attachments put up by

16 business improvement areas on its primary distribution poles. THESL is in the

17 process of gathering such data in the ordinary course, but due to the time-consuming

18 nature of the project, it is not possible to have this data available for the purposes of

19 the present proceeding.

20

21 Streetlighting poles — currently THESI assets - were erected for a different purpose

22 and have different physical characteristics than THESL's distribution poles, which

23 carry primary voltage. THESL only received approval from the Board to transfer

24 certain streetlighting poles from THESI to THESL in August 2011, and the related

25 transactions have not occurred yet. Accordingly, THESL is currently in the process

53

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.1 Schedule 7 Filed: 2011 Sep 30 Page 3 of 3

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

1 of transitioning these assets, including assessing the appropriate standards, safety,

2 operational and other considerations that apply in respect of streetlighting poles. It

3 would be premature for THESL to speculate on the considerations that would apply

4 to those streetlighting poles. Further, streetlighting poles are not essential facilities for

5 wireless attachers and the CCTA Decision does not apply to them for those wireless

6 attachers' purposes.

7

8 (e) THESL has various maintenance programs for preventive, predictive and corrective

9 or emergency maintenance, including asset condition assessments.

10

11 (f) THESL will replace a Pole if under any of the various maintenance programs, or

12 through any other means, a pole is found to be in unacceptable condition. THESL

13 Poles may also be replaced for other reasons. For example, refer to page 37, Section

14 3.3.7 in the EB-2011-0144 THESL Evidence, Exhibit D1, Tab 71, Schedule 6 that

15 discusses the Rear Lot and Box Construction Conversion capital programs. This

16 information can be found on the Board's website at the following weblink:

17 http://www.rds.ontarioenergyboard.ca/webdrawer/webdrawer.d11/webdrawer/search/r

18 ec&sm_udfl0=eb-2011-0144&sortd1=rs_dateregistered&rows=200

19

20 (g) Not necessarily. For example, where THESL is required to move its poles for the

21 purposes of road widenings, not every THESL Pole would be visually inspected.

22

54

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Reponses Tab 5.1 Schedule 15 Filed: 2011 Oct 3 Page 1 of 6

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

1 INTERROGATORY 15:

2 Reference(s): Byrne, para. 16

3

4 a) Do non-communications attachments on power poles present physical impediments to 5 pole workers accessing or climbing the poles? 6 b) Are line crews trained to navigate around non-communication attachments?

7 c) Explain how navigating around non-communications, non-distribution attachments

8 ("NDAs") differs from navigating around communications NDAs? 9 d) CCTV carriers install power supplies in the unused portion of the pole, the to communication space and the separation space. Does THESL categorize these types 11 of power supplies as communication or non-communications NDAs? 12 e) Would splice enclosures installed by the ILEC' s or CLEC's in the unused portion of

13 the pole, in the communication space or in the separation space, be considered

14 communication or non-communications NDAs? 15 f) Provide a list of all non-wireline (i.e. fibre, cable or other) NDAs attached to THESL

16 poles and, for each such NDA, describe: 17 (i) The geographic location of each NDA 18 (ii) The specific type of NDA attachment (e.g. surveillance camera, Wi-Fi

19 antenna, battery unit, DAS antenna, etc.)

20 (iii)The owner of each NDA

21 (iv)The size, weight, dimensions and other physical specifications of each NDA 22 (v) The attachment location of each NDA on the pole (distribution space, 23 communication space, unusable space, etc.) 24 (vi)The attachment method (e.g. through bolt, metal band, in-line (i.e. on-cable, 25 etc.)

55

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Reponses Tab 5.1 Schedule 15 Filed: 2011 Oct 3 Page 2 of 6

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

1 (vii) The rates charged for each type of NDA

2 g) Provide a list of all wireless attachments that are used in conjunction with electricity

3 distribution such as SCADA antennas or other SCADA equipment, and, for each such

4 attachment, describe:

5 (i) The geographic location of each wireless attachment

6 (ii) The specific type of wireless attachment

7 (iii)The owner of each wireless attachment

8 (iv)The size, weight, dimensions and other physical specifications of each

9 wireless attachment to (v) The attachment location on the pole of each wireless attachment (distribution

11 space, communication space, unusable space, etc.)

12 (vi)The attachment method (e.g. through bolt, metal band, in-line (i.e. on-cable,

13 etc.)

14 h) Does THESL publish standard terms and conditions pertaining to non-communication

15 attachments?

16 i) Provide a pro forma copy of one attachment agreement in respect of non-

17 communication attachments.

18 j) Provide a copy of THESL's policies governing the attachment of non-communication

19 equipment.

20 k) Provide a copy of THESL's construction guidelines pertaining to non-communication

21 attachments.

22 1) Provide a copy of the pro forma permit application pertaining to non-communication

23 equipment.

56

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Reponses Tab 5.1 Schedule 15 Filed: 2011 Oct 3 Page 3 of 6

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

m) Is any wireless equipment, including equipment associated with wireless attachments,

2 currently attached outside the communications space on any THESL pole? If "yes",

3 provide:

4 (i) The geographic location of each such wireless attachment

5 (ii) The specific type of such wireless attachment

6 (iii)The owner of each such wireless attachment

7 (iv)The size, weight, dimensions and other physical specifications of each such

8 wireless attachment

9 (v) The attachment location on the pole of each such wireless attachment (distribution

10 space, communication space, unusable space, etc.)

11 (vi)The attachment method (e.g. through bolt, metal band, in-line (i.e. on-cable, etc.)

12

13 RESPONSE:

14 a) NDAs on THESL Poles may limit pole climbing and bucket mobility, and can make

15 work such as stringing conductors more difficult and time consuming for THESL.

16 When performing work such as pole replacements or removals, attachments are an

17 additional project dependency in the project planning and execution, and can delay

18 this work.

19

20 b) During their apprentice and other training, as well as on-going work, THESL staff are

21 taught how to work around NDAs on poles. Please see also the response in Tab 5.1,

22 Schedule 5, part (b).

23

24 c) All attachments (whether or not communications attachments) create an encumbrance

25 on THESL Poles that THESL crews must navigate around. 57

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Reponses Tab 5.1 Schedule 15 Filed: 2011 Oct 3 Page 4 of 6

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

1

2 d) THESL does not consider CCTV NDAs to be communications NDAs.

3 e) CANDAS has not defined what an ILEC or CLEC is, which is required in order for

4 THESL to answer this question. THESL believes that this refers to splices that are

5 made in-line (i.e. along the wireline), and are not installed on the pole, and therefore

6 THESL does not consider these to be NDAs.

7

8 f) Please see also the response in Tab 5.1, Schedule 7. THESL does not have records

9 that capture the geographic location of each NDA, the specific type of NDA

10 attachment, the size, weight, dimensions and other physical specification of each

11 NDA (other than as detailed in THESL's standards, attached as Exhibit "A" to

12 CANDAS Byrne IR 1), the attachment location of each NDA on the pole, nor the

13 attachment method. THESL is in the process of gathering such data in the ordinary

14 course, but due to the time-consuming nature of the project, it is not possible to have

15 this data available for the purposes of the present proceeding.

16

17 Regarding (iii), the specific owner name of NDAs is not relevant to this proceeding,

18 and in any event confidential. The non-wireline attachments, by type, are as follows:

19 TYPE TOTAL NUMBER transit shelters 297 DAScom 105 wireless antennae 58

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Reponses Tab 5.1 Schedule 15 Filed: 2011 Oct 3 Page 5 of 6

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

rectifier 170 transit 443 equipment baskets, 1968 banners, lighting traffic signs and No Data signals, police cameras

1

2 Regarding (vii), the rate applied to telecommunications attachments on THESL primary 3 distribution poles is $22.35. Others are not relevant to this proceeding, and in any event,

4 confidential.

5

6

7 Refer to the two lists: 8 - SCADA equipment, attached as Attachment 1

9 - Radio equipment, attached as Attachment 2

10

11 h) Yes. See THESL Standards Section 23. Standards 23-1100 through 2500 provide

12 information for how temporary and decorative attachments are made.

13

14 i) DAS corn is a current THESL customer and has numerous examples of attachment

15 agreements within its possession. 59

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Reponses Tab 5.1 Schedule 15 Filed: 2011 Oct 3 Page 6 of 6

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

j) See THESL Standards Section 23. Standards 23-100 through 2500 give the

2 information for how temporary and decorative attachments are made. Standards 23-

3 3500 and 3900 show the installation for traffic sensors and Enbridge rectifier power

4 supplies, respectively. THESL does not have any further written policies.

5

6 k) See answer to (j) above.

7

8 1) DAScom is a current THESL customer and has numerous examples of permit

9 applications within its possession. 10

11 m) Yes. Please see the reponses in Tab 1, Schedules 19 and 20. See also see the

12 response in Tab 5.1, Schedule 11, part (d), as well as (f) above. Please see CANDAS

13 Evidence Larson for the specifications and placement of DAScom equipment.

14

15

16

17

18

60

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.1 Schedule 16 Filed: 2011 Sep 22 Page 1 of 3

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

INTERROGATORY 16:

2 Reference(s): Byrne, paras. 19-20

3

4 The reference states that: "[P]rior to 2009, THESL had a group of four dedicated

5 employees who processed NDA applications" and "[W]hereas in 2007 and 2008, we

6 received 103 and 418 attachment requests respectively, in 2009 we received 1135

7 requests."

8 a) What percentage of the annual increase in applications received the period 2007

9 to present were in respect of wireless attachments? What percentage were in

10 respect of DAS?

11 b) How many attachment applications were received annually, in the period 2007 to

12 present, in respect of:

13 (i) NDAs

14 (ii) Other types of applications

15 (iii)Wireless attachments (please include a breakdown of different types of

16 wireless attachments)

17 (iv)Wireline attachments

18 c) Given the increase in applications for NDAs between 2007 and 2009, why did

19 THESL wait until 2009 to begin to augment staffing in this area?

20 d) What were the average times to process an attachment application, by type of

21 attachment (i.e. wireless, wireline, etc.) in the period 2007 to present. Describe

22 how these times have been calculated, including methodology and data collection

23 methods.

61

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.1 Schedule 16 Filed: 2011 Sep 22 Page 2 of 3

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

e) For each year in the period 2007 to present, provide the average time required to

2 perform fieldwork (e.g. make ready work) to accommodate a permitted

3 attaclunent.

4 0 How does THESL prioritize the processing of attachment applications, e.g. first 5 in-first out, by application type, by complexity of the application, by entity

6 requesting attachment, etc.?

7

8 RESPONSE:

9 (a) Please refer to the response in Tab 5.1, Schedule 27. THESL is not able to tell on

10 the face of wireline applications which applications are to support wireless. The

11 information provided by CANDAS in response to THESL IR 1.1 is that Cogeco

12 submitted 303 applications between 2009 and 2010 for the wireline aspect needed

13 for DAScom's wireless attachments.

14

15 (b) (i) THESL has incomplete data on total number of NDA applications it received

16 annually, in the period 2007 to present.

1 7 (ii) not applicable

18 (iii) see answer to (a) above

19 (iv) Please see the affidavit of Ms. Byrne, at paragraph 32

20

21 (c) There were no set time frames in the applicable agreements within which

22 attachment applications needed to be processed by THESL.

23

24 (d) THESL does not track processing time by type of attachment.

25 62

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Inten-ogatory Responses Tab 5.1 Schedule 16 Filed: 2011 Sep 22 Page 3 of 3

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

(e) THESL does not track average time required to perform fieldwork.

2

3 (f) THESL has historically used a first-in-first-out system, but clients are allowed to 4 designate which attachments are to be processed within their positions in the first-

5 in-first out queue.

6

7

8

9

63

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.1 Schedule 27 Filed: 2011 Sep 22 Page 1 of 2

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

INTERROGATORY 27:

2 Reference(s): Byrne, para. 34

3

4 Ms. Byrne states, "[T]he major distinction signified by the term "wireless" (as compared

5 to wireline) is that the equipment being supported is not composed primarily of cable

6 which must run contiguously between poles in order to function."

7 a) Is it THESL's position that the attachment of the wireline components of a wireless

8 network is mandated by the CCTA Decision in the same manner as the attachment of

9 the wireline component of a wireline network? If the response is "no", explain why to not. 11 12 b) Is it THESL's position that the wireline connection required to support DAS networks

13 is materially different than the wireline connection required to support CATV

14 components? If "yes", explain the reasons why.

15

16 RESPONSE: 17 a) THESL treats applications for wireline attachments equally. THESL does not know

18 the ultimate purpose of the wireline application at the time of processing that

19 application. It is THESL's understanding that DAScom has entered into an

20 agreement with Public Mobile (perhaps via Extenet, which is not a "Canadian carrier"

21 as defined within the Telecommunications Act) to put up all of the attachments

22 necessary to build Public Mobile's telecommunications network, and that one or both

23 of these parties has entered into an agreement with Cogeco to put up the wireline

24 component of this network. Therefore, applications for the wireless and wireline

25 portions respectively of the DAS network come from different entities, and the

26 connection between them (if any) is not apparent to THESL. 64

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.1 Schedule 27 Filed: 2011 Sep 22 Page 2 of 2

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

1

2 b) Yes. The material difference between "stand alone" wireline attachments

3 telecommunications and those which support wireless systems is that in the case of

4 the latter (i.e. wireline which is a component of wireless systems), but-for the wireless

5 attachments, the wireline component is unnecessary. In the case of DAS, the need for

6 the wireline component is dependent on the existence of the DAS wireless equipment,

7 including the antenna(s) associated with those wireless mini-systems.

8

65

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.4 Schedule 20 Filed: 2011 Sep 20 Page 1 of 4

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

1 INTERROGATORY 20:

2 Reference(s): Yatchew, page 29, lines 23-24

3

4 Dr. Yatchew states: 5 "Wireline attachers are fundamentally different from wireless entities as the latter do not

6 require continuous corridors for placement of their wireless facilities." 7 (a) Confirm whether Dr. Yatchew relies on the LCC International, Inc. report for his 8 understanding that wireless entities "do not require continuous corridors for placement of 9 their wireless facilities." 10 (i) If so, provide the specific excerpts from the LCC International, Inc. report 11 upon which Dr. Yatchew relies in this regard.

12 (b) Advise whether Dr. Yatchew relies on any other sources for his understanding that

13 wireless entities "do not require continuous corridors for placement of their wireless

14 facilities."

15 (i) If so, provide the all relevant references and specific excerpts upon which Dr.

16 Yatchew relies.

17 (c) Advise whether Dr. Yatchew has any personal knowledge or experience relevant to 18 the requirements or desirable features of the deployment of wireless facilities.

19 (i) If so, answer the following questions. If Dr. Yatchew has no prior knowledge

20 or experience concerning the placement of equipment on utility poles, Dr.

21 Yatchew need not answer the following questions:

22 A. Explain how the unique contiguous nature of a pole route's design

23 differs from the required contiguous nature of a Greenfield wireless

24 network design to provide for basic mobile service coverage in a given

25 area.

66

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.4 Schedule 20 Filed: 2011 Sep 20 Page 2 of 4

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

1 B. Can fibre cables be strung overhead, from building rooftop, to towers,

2 to billboards or alternate structures on anything other than utility poles?

3 C. Indicate whether Dr. Yatchew would agree that the installation of

4 wireless equipment on utility poles within 10 feet of the fibre optic cable

5 is more commercially viable than attempting to attach to buildings,

6 rooftops, towers or other structures, which will inevitably require fibre

7 lateral engineering and construction from the pole line to the building?

8 D. Would the cost, increased administrative burdens, disruptive nature of

9 underground construction, road and sidewalk restoration and other factors 10 and costs in building a fibre network to reach an alternative location

11 represent a barrier to entry to wireless carriers if wireless carriers were

12 refused access to utility poles?

13 E. If not, provide an economic and operational assessment that

14 demonstrates specifically what barriers to entry exist for wireline carriers

15 that do not exist for wireless carriers having to use alternate structures.

16

17 RESPONSE: 18 a) The LCC study is helpful and informative. 19

20 Moreover, it is reassuring that my conclusion, that "Wireline attachers are

21 fundamentally different from wireless entities as the latter do not require continuous

22 corridors for placement of their wireless facilities.", which I arrived at long before the

23 present proceeding, is confnmed by the engineering expertise underlying this document.

67

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.4 Schedule 20 Filed: 2011 Sep 20 Page 3 of 4

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

b) I arrived at this conclusion earlier in the course of reviewing various issues associated

2 with attachments to power poles.

3

4 c) Please see below.

5 A. The development of a true "Greenfield" setting, such as a new residential,

6 commercial or industrial development, would entail the provision of a number

7 of physically connected networks: power, water supply, sewage, natural gas if 8 available, and cables/fibre for the provision of telecom services. (Presently, it

9 is common to put all of these systems underground.) A wireless network 10 would then be super-imposed on the existing wireline systems by placing

11 wireless components at judicious locations and connecting them to wireline

12 systems.

13 B. Wireline systems are attached to structures other than poles, indeed the

14 provision of centrally generated electricity to our homes would be impossible

15 otherwise. Fibre can also be attached to structures other than poles. However,

16 the main supply lines for wireline services are overwhelmingly run along

17 support structures such as poles, or through underground conduits.

18 C. Each siting option, no doubt has advantages and disadvantages.

19 D. To the extent that up-front costs -- for example those associated with

20 obtaining access to wireline systems -- represent a barrier to entry, such costs

21 are incurred by all participants in the provision of wireless services. That

22 Public Mobile and other new entrants were able to launch their services in a

23 timely fashion in both Toronto and Montreal, suggests that these costs do not

24 represent an especially adverse barrier to entry. 68

Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited EB-2011-0120 Interrogatory Responses Tab 5.4 Schedule 20 Filed: 2011 Sep 20 Page 4 of 4

RESPONSES TO CANADIAN DISTRIBUTED ANTENNA SYSTEMS COALITION INTERROGATORIES

1 E. Perhaps the most stringent barrier to entry for a wireline service provider that

2 wishes to construct a new network of above-ground support structures is that

3 government approvals would most likely not be granted in areas where such

4 structures already exist. TAB 4 69

APPLICATION 70

Table of Contents

1.0 Relief Sought 1 2.0 Why Board Intervention is Required 3 3.0 The CCTA Order 4 4.0 The Applicant 12 5.0 DAS Technology 12 6.0 The Toronto DAS Network 15 (a) Agreement with City of Toronto 16 (b) Pole Access Agreements 16 7.0 Course of Dealing with THESL 19 8.0 The THESL Letter and the THESL/THESI Email 21 9.0 Termination of the Pole Access Agreements 23 10.0 Grounds 25 (a) Public Utilities vs. Private Corporations 25 (b) Breach of CCTA Order and Electricity Distribution Licences 27 (c) Unjust Discrimination and Undue Preference 29 (d) Anti-Competitive Behaviour 33 (e) Ontario Utilities are Acting with Unfettered Discretion 35 11.0 Interim Orders 38 12.0 Costs 40 13.0 Evidence 40

56901046_6.DOCX 71

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 1 of 41

ONTARIO ENERGY BOARD

IN THE MATTER OF the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c. 15 (Schedule B);

AND IN THE MATTER OF an Application by the Canadian Distributed Antenna Systems Coalition for certain orders under the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998.

APPLICATION

1.0 Relief Sought

The Canadian Distributed Antenna Systems Coalition ("CANDAS" or the "Applicant"), on behalf of its member companies and pursuant to Rule 16 of the Ontario Energy Board Rules of Practice and Procedure, applies to the Ontario Energy Board ("Board" or "OEB") for the following relief:

(a) Orders under subsections 70(1.1) and 74(1) of the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998 ("OEB Act"): (i) determining that the Ontario Energy Board's RP-2003- 0249 Decision and Order dated March 7, 2005 ("CCTA Order") requires electricity distributors to provide "Canadian carriers," as that term is defined in the Telecommunications Act, S.C. 1993, c. 38 ("Telecommunications Act"), with access to the power poles of such distributors for purposes of attaching wireless equipment, including wireless components of distributed antenna systems ("DAS"); and (ii) directing all licensed electricity distributors to provide such access if they are not so doing;

56901046_6.DOCX 72

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 2 of 41

(b) in the alternative, an Order under subsection 74(1) of the OEB Act amending the licences of all electricity distributors requiring them to provide Canadian carriers with timely access to the power poles of such distributors for purposes of attaching wireless equipment, including wireless components of DAS;

(c) an interim Order under subsection 21(7) of the OEB Act directing electricity distributors to refrain from adopting, implementing or enforcing, as the case may be, any policy or conduct that denies Canadian carriers timely access to the power poles of such distributors for purposes of attaching wireless equipment, including wireless components of DAS, pending disposition of the Applicant's requests for final orders;

(d) an interim Order under subsection 21(7) of the OEB Act directing Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. ("THESI") to identify THESI's light standards, poles or other structures classified as distribution assets in accordance with the Board's Decision and Order issued on February 11, 2010 in EB-2009-0180 ("MADD Order") and to refrain from removing, selling or disposing of any DAS facilities currently affixed to any of the foregoing, pending disposition of the Applicant's requests for final orders. A copy of the MADD Decision and Order is included at Tab 1 of this Application;

(e) an Order under subsections 74(1) and 70(2)(c) of the OEB Act amending the licences of all licensed electricity distributors requiring them to include, in their Conditions of Service, the terms and conditions of access to power poles by Canadian carriers, including the terms and conditions of access for the purpose of deploying the wireless and wireline components of DAS, such terms and conditions to provide for, without limitation: commercially reasonable procedures for the timely processing of applications for attachments and the performance of the work required to prepare poles for attachments ("Make Ready Work"); technical requirements that are consistent with applicable safety regulations and standards; and a standard form of licensed occupancy agreement, such agreement

-2- 73

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 3 of 41

to provide for attachment permits with terms of at least 15 years from the date of attachment and for commercially reasonable renewal rights;

(0 its costs of this proceeding in a fashion and quantum to be decided by the Board pursuant to s. 30 of the OEB Act; and

(g) such further and other relief as the Board may consider just and reasonable.

2.0 Why Board Intervention is Required

2.1 In 2005, the Board made the CCTA Order. It requires electricity distributors to grant Canadian carriers and cable companies access to distributors' power poles for the purpose of attaching telecommunications equipment. In making the CCTA Order, the Board drew no distinction between wireless and wireline carriers or equipment.

2.2 Until August of 2010, Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited ("THESL") complied with the CCTA Order. THESL did so without distinguishing between wireless and wireline carriers or equipment. THESL entered into pole access agreements permitting the attachment of both wireless and wireline equipment, charging the Board-approved rate per pole.

2.3 All of this changed suddenly when, on August 13, 2010, THESL sent a letter to the Board advising of a new "policy" not to permit the attachment of wireless equipment to its power poles. In its letter, THESL expressed the view that the CCTA Order did not apply to wireless equipment. For reasons unknown to the Applicant, THESL chose not to serve this letter on any directly affected parties; moreover, THESL repeatedly refused to provide the letter to affected parties who requested a copy. A copy of THESL's written response to one such request is included at Tab 2 of this Application.

2.4 Some months after the August 13 th filing, the Applicant obtained, from the Board, a copy of the letter and the accompanying attachment (together, the "THESL Letter"). A copy of the THESL Letter is included at Tab 3 of this Application.

2.5 CANDAS is not aware of any response of the Board to the THESL Letter.

-3 - 74

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 4 of 41

2.6 Since the date of the THESL Letter, THESL has purported to be honouring existing pole access agreements with wireless attachers. It will not, however, enter into new agreements for wireless attachments or, presumably, renew existing pole access agreements at the end of their terms. THESL's unregulated sister company, THESI, appears to have adopted the same "no wireless" policy, refusing to renew an existing agreement with a wireless attacher and exercising its contractual right to require the attacher to remove all of its equipment from THESI's poles.

2.7 At least one other large electricity distributor in Ontario appears to be following THESL's lead by adopting a "no wireless" policy. Certain other distributors appear to be considering whether or not to permit wireless attachments and, if so, on what terms and conditions. They are, accordingly, not prepared to offer pole access agreements for wireless attachments at this time.

2.8 In the result, investments in wireless networks that were made in reliance on the CCTA Order have become stranded. Moreover, Canadian carriers who require access to power poles to enable their wireless networks are now effectively precluded from entering the market. This is either because they are unable to obtain pole access at all, or because the terms and conditions of such access are completely indeterminate or subject to such uncertainties as to prelude the requisite capital investments.

2.9 If left unchecked, the ability of electricity distributors to use their monopoly power to unduly discriminate among Canadian carriers by unilaterally deciding who may have access to regulated assets and who may not, will materially and adversely affect the development of a competitive wireless industry in Ontario.

3.0 The CCTA Order

3.1 On December 13, 2003 the Canadian Cable Television Association ("CCTA"), on behalf of the 23 cable companies then operating in Ontario, applied to the Board for certain relief Specifically, the CCTA sought a generic amendment to the licences of all electricity distributors, under subsections 74(1) and 21(7) of the OEB Act, establishing uniform terms of access to power poles.

-4- 75

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 5 of 41

3.2 For more than six years prior to the filing of the CCTA application, the member companies of the CCTA had been negotiating with electricity distributors regarding the terms and conditions of a new pole attachment agreement. The last pole attachment agreement between CCTA members and the Ontario Municipal Electric Association, ("MEA"), the predecessor to the Electricity Distributors' Association ("EDA"), had expired on December 31, 1996.

3.3 Prior to seeking the Board's assistance, the CCTA had also applied to the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission ("CRTC") to obtain a determination regarding the appropriate pole access charge. The CRTC had subsequently issued an order setting the charge at $15.89 per year.' The MEA appealed this order to the Federal Court of Appeal which, in 2001, ruled that the CRTC lacked jurisdiction to regulate access to power poles by cable companies and Canadian carriers.

3.4 In 2003, on appeal by the CRTC, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld the decision of the Federal Court of Appea1. 2

3.5 In May 2004, and in response to the CCTA application, the OEB convened a proceeding ("CCTA Proceeding") to hear and decide whether: (i) it should regulate pole access; (ii) if so, who should be granted access; and (iii) on what terms and conditions. A copy of the Issues List from the CCTA Proceeding ("Issues List") is included at Tab 4 of this Application.

3.6 During a settlement conference convened prior to the commencement of the oral hearing, the parties to the CCTA Proceeding reached a complete settlement on only one of the five issues on the Issues List. A copy of the Settlement Agreement filed on October 19, 2004, as amended on October 20 th (together, the "Settlement Agreement"), is included at Tab 5 of this Application.

3.7 On March 7, 2005, after hearing testimony from cable companies, Canadian carriers and electricity distributors during the course of a seven month proceeding, the Board released

CCTA v. MEA et al. — Final Decision, Telecom Decision CRTC 99-13, September 28, 1999. 2 Barrie Public Utilities v. Canadian Cable Television Assn., 2003 SCC 28.

-5- 76

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 6 of 41

its decision and order (i.e., the "CCTA Order"). A copy of the CCTA Order is included at Tab 6 of this Application.

3.8 On the issue of whether the Board should regulate pole access (Issue 1 on the Issues List), there was no settlement among the parties. The Board decided the issue as follows: 3

There has been some evidence on both sides with respect to abuse. In the end the CCTA says that the electricity distributors do have monopoly power and the fact that the parties have been unable to come to an agreement for over a decade demonstrates the exercise of that monopoly power whether this results in abuse or not.

The Board agrees. A showing of abuse is not necessary to justify the intervention of this Board in this matter. The fact is the parties have been unable to reach an agreement in over a decade. This degree of uncertainty is not in the public interest.

The Board agrees that power poles are essential facilities. It is a well established principle of regulatory law that where a party controls essential facilities, it is important that non-discriminatory access be granted to other parties. Not only must rates be just and reasonable, there must be no preference in favour of the holder of the essential facilities. Duplication of poles is neither viable nor in the public interest.

The Board concludes that it should set access charges. [emphasis added]

3.9 The Board had also addressed the concept of "essential facilities" and "monopoly assets" earlier in the CCTA Proceeding, in response to certain motions:

3 CCTA Order, p. 3.

-6- 77

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 7 of 41

We realize that we've departed from our earlier decision with respect to costs in this matter, but the proceeding has changed materially in its complexion. In particular, the telecom companies have intervened and we think that has made a difference. We think it is important that the access to be enjoyed by telecom companies be dealt with at the same time as the cable companies. It's not in the Board's interest, nor in the public interest, or any of the parties' interest to split this into two separate proceedings.

We recognize that these are essential facilities. They are not only monopoly assets, as Mr. Brett stressed, but they are essential facilities, and non-discriminatory access is important. In this regard, the Board notes these industries are converging. The cable companies are increasingly competing with telecom companies and vice versa, and the LDCs are, themselves, entering into some telecommunication activities. In such circumstances, it is important that there be non-discriminatory access and no undue preference to any of the competing entities. [emphasis added]

3.10 On the issue of who should have access (Issue 2 on the Issues List), the parties to the CCTA proceeding (including THESL) did reach a settlement. In presenting the Settlement Agreement 4 to the Board, CCTA's counsel submitted as follows: 5

On the second issue, though, we did reach agreement, after some considerable discussion. And in general, I think it would be fair to say that the parties reached more agreement than they thought they would. There was a genuine effort made, I believe, by both sides, and I believe, Gail Morrison, the facilitator, assisted the process very ably. So we did reach agreement on certain issues, and we

4 The Settlement Agreement was filed as Exhibit E1.1. 5 RP-2003-0249, Transcript Vol. 1 at 183.

-7- 78

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 8 of 41

were able to provide a framework, or a sort of a summary framework for issues that we didn't agree on, to some degree.

Number 2 is an example of an issue that we did agree on. Number 2 is:

"If the Board does set conditions of access, to what types of cable or telecommunications services providers should these conditions apply to?"

And you can see the answer there is that they should apply to - "These conditions should apply to access to the communication space on an LDC's poles by Canadian carriers as defined in the Telecommunications Act and cable companies, provided, however" — and this is an important exception — "that these conditions shall not apply to joint-use arrangements between incumbent local exchange carriers and hydro distributors that grant reciprocal access to each other's poles."

And you will recall that this is really — that exception is crafted to exempt arrangements between Bell Canada and hydro companies in Ontario where they have, effectively, an arrangement where they use each other's poles. [emphasis added]

3.11 That the parties' settlement on this issue was reached after "considerable discussion" and resulted in universal access by all Canadian carriers (with only the Bell Canada carve- out) is significant. As appears from the THESL Letter, THESL now takes the position that the CCTA Order does not apply to wireless attachments because there was no discussion about such attachments during the CCTA Proceeding and the Board never "turned its mind" to this issue. To suggest that wireless attachments are not within the scope of the CCTA Order because the issue was not debated in the CCTA Proceeding ignores the fact that the parties in that proceeding had already agreed, as part of the settlement, that access should be given to all Canadian carriers and not just to wireline

-8- 79

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 9 of 41

carriers. Accordingly, there was no need for further discussion of this issue during the CCTA Proceeding. Moreover, to now suggest that the Board never turned its mind to the issue is to suggest that the Board and Board counsel did not apprehend that the definition of "Canadian carrier" included wireless carriers. Such a suggestion would be quite remarkable.

3.12 The Board's reasons for accepting the settlement of Issue 2 are articulated in the following passages: 6

On this issue, the parties are in agreement. In the Settlement Agreement of October 19, 2004, all parties agreed that if the Board does set access conditions, these conditions should apply to access...by all Canadian Carriers as defined in the Telecommunications Act and cable companies. The only exception is that these conditions would not apply to the current joint use agreements between telephone companies and electricity companies that grant reciprocal access to each others poles.

This Board has accepted the settlement agreement in this regard. In addition, the Board has heard submissions to the effect that the LDCs agree that their own telecommunication affiliates would access poles on the same conditions as other users of the communications space. The LDCs also confirmed that all users of the communications space should pay the same charge.

This is an important clarification. This market is changing rapidhL and industries are converging. Cable companies are now providing the telecommunication services just as the electricity distributors enter this industry. The fact that two groups that have been warring over the past decade are fast becoming competitors is an additional reason for the Board to intervene and establish clear

6 CCTA Order, p. 4.

-9- 80

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 10 of 41

guidelines. From this Board's perspective, it is equally important that costs be properly allocated and that the electricity distributor (and ultimately, the electricity ratepayer) receives its fair share of revenue. [emphasis added]

3.13 In the result, the Board ordered that':

The licence conditions of the electricity distributors licensed by this Board shall as of the date of this Order be amended to provide that all Canadian carriers as defined by the Telecommunications Act and all cable companies that operate in the Province of Ontario shall have access to the power poles of the electricity distributors at the rate of $22.35 per pole per year. [emphasis added]

3.14 The parties did not agree on the Issue 3 series of issues dealing with the appropriate charge for joint pole use. In particular, with respect to Issue 3(b) — "[H]ow should the charge be applied?" — one group took the position that the access charge should be applied on a per-pole, per user basis and not on a per-attachment basis, regardless of the number of attachments on a pole. 8 The parties who took this position defined "attachment," for this purpose (i.e., for the purpose of their position on the joint use charge issue and only for this purpose) as excluding "wireless transmitters and power line carriers."9' 10 The Board ultimately decided the pole charge issue in a way that did not distinguish among various types of attachments.

3.15 There was no agreement on what terms and conditions should govern pole access (Issue 4 on the Issues List) but the parties did agree to negotiate this matter separately, after the Board had issued its decision on the other issues on the Issues List." Pending the outcome of such negotiations, the CCTA, EDA and the Canadian Electricity Association

7 CCTA Order, p. 11. 8 Settlement Agreement, p. 6. 9 Presumably, the exclusion was intended to pertain to the "wireless attachments" of "wireless carriers". I° U-2003-0249, Transcript Vol.] at 221. / I Settlement Agreement, p. 8.

-1 0- 81

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 11 of 41

agreed to recommend, to their respective members, that pole access not be denied on the basis that an access agreement had yet to be negotiated. 12

3.16 By letter dated April 14, 2005, the CCTA requested that the Board confirm that all Ontario electricity distributors were required to provide pole access to "any attacher that is prepared to pay the rate established by the Board" regardless of whether agreement had been reached on terms and condition of access. A copy of this letter is included at Tab 7 of this Application. On May 30, 2005, the Board's Chief Compliance Officer issued Compliance Bulletin 200505 which stated that the obligation to provide pole access was in effect, that distributors were required to process attachment requests in a timely manner and that the access obligation applied, regardless of whether an agreement had been negotiated. A copy of the Compliance Bulletin is included at Tab 8 of this Application.

3.17 On August 3, 2005, some months after the conclusion of the CCTA Proceeding, the CCTA and the Mearie Group (representing 60 electricity distributors) filed an agreed- upon standard form of access agreement with the Board. Significantly, the Board never reviewed or approved this form of agreement and it appears that the Board never responded to the filing.

3.18 In 2005, the OEB's decision in the CCTA proceeding was followed by the New Brunswick Board of Commissioners of Public Utilities ("NBPUC") in another pole access case (the "NB Pole Access Case"). 13 In that case, Rogers Cable Communications Inc. brought an application seeking access to the poles of the New Brunswick Power Distribution and Customer Service Corporation ("Disco").

3.19 After noting that the New Brunswick legislative scheme was "patterned on and to some extent drawn from" the OEB Act, the NBPUC held that the CCTA Order had dealt with "virtually the same issue". The NBPUC went on to state the "reasoning of the OEB to be

12 Ibid.

13 Ruling - Rogers Jurisdiction Motion, October 27, 2005, Appendix C to the Decision of the New Brunswick Board of Commissioners of Public Utilities dated June 9, 2006 in the matter of a Rate Application dated March 21, 2005 by New Brunswick Power Distribution & Customer Service Corporation. 82

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 12 of 41

on all fours with the [NBPUC's] appreciation of the situation in New Brunswick" and ordered that access should be granted.

4.0 The Applicant

4. 1 CANDAS is a coalition of Canadian companies engaged in the telecommunications industry sector. CANDAS was formed for the purpose of promoting the ongoing improvement of wireless communications services in Canada, by creating an environment conducive to the rapid deployment of DAS networks in those areas where DAS technology offers technical, economic and environmental advantages that cannot be realized through traditional macro cell site infrastructure.

4.2 The members of CANDAS — Public Mobile Inc. ("Public Mobile"), ExteNet Systems

(Canada), Inc. ("ExteNet") and DAScom Inc. ("DAScom") — collaborated, with others, in a project to establish a new wireless network in the City of Toronto using DAS

technology. This network — the Toronto DAS Network — and the technology that underpins it are described in more detail in sections 5 and 6 below.

5.0 DAS Technology

5.1 A DAS network comprises three main elements: (i) multiple telecommunications "nodes," incorporating small, low elevation antennas and low-power radio units; (ii) fibre optic cabling that connects the nodes to the communications network through one or more hubs where the communications signal traffic is aggregated and interfaced with the equipment of the wireless carrier or carriers utilizing the DAS network; and (iii) one or more central hub facilities housing the wireless carriers' equipment that propagates and receives communication signals to and from the nodes utilizing the wireless carriers' licensed radio frequency spectrum.

5.2 The wireless and wireline components of a DAS network are equally essential to the operation of the network. One cannot function without the other. The antennas and radio units must be proximate to and interconnected with the fibre optic cabling which, as with other wireline systems, is most effectively and efficiently deployed by aerial suspension

12- 83

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 13 of 41

from support structures in public rights-of-way or established utility easements. Therefore, it makes sense — economically, environmentally and operationally — to attach the wireless equipment on the same support structures from which the fibre optic cabling is suspended.

5.3 Optimal and effective design and deployment of DAS networks require that node antennas be attached at elevations that correspond roughly to the heights of utility and street light poles (9-14 meters), as opposed to higher elevations of towers and the roof tops of multi-story buildings (greater than 15 meters). Ideally, cabling and equipment should also be located at street intersections and along traffic corridors to enable unimpeded transmission of wireless signals in the areas traversed by mobile users and into the most heavily traveled areas of surrounding buildings.

5.4 Depending on the particular needs of a given wireless carrier, the customers it serves and the characteristics of the area in which services are to be provided, a DAS network may be: (i) a complete substitute for a traditional macro cell site deployment (as detailed below); or (ii) a complement to a traditional deployment, providing enhanced coverage and increased network capacity in particular areas with high demands for services. Once installed, a DAS network (or portions thereof) may also be used to support the services of multiple wireless carriers, with relatively little incremental construction and disruption.

5.5 Traditional cellular telephone network technology relies on "Macro Cell Sites," comprising large antenna arrays mounted on tall communication towers or on building tops. These sites transmit high powered radio signals over large areas. Especially in urban settings, these large, wireless installations: (i) are typically more obtrusive; (ii) often provide incomplete coverage in areas around tall buildings which block radio signals; (iii) are less flexible in areas where capacity requirements may be changing; (iv) do not allow for the most efficient use of radio spectrum and radio equipment; and (v) are less suited to providing the high data through-put required by "smart phone" services. Compounding these problems is the fact that increases in the demand for high data rate services can only be met through the construction of more Macro Cell Sites.

-13- 84

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 14 of 41

5.6 In contrast, DAS networks can be deployed rapidly to provide precise, targeted coverage in areas that are not easily accessible to Macro Cell Sites. Such networks can more readily accommodate changes in capacity utilization and enable more efficient use of the carriers' licensed radio frequency spectrum. Moreover, DAS technology functions with less interference and delivers services at high data rates, using less radio frequency spectrum bandwidth.

5.7 Although the upfront capital cost of a DAS network may be higher than that of a Macro Cell Site deployment designed to cover the same geographic area, long-term user costs are generally substantially less. This is due to the flexibility and efficiencies described above and the fact that multiple wireless carriers can utilize components of the same DAS network, thereby spreading the cost over more users. Cost efficiencies can also result from the enhanced efficiency with which the wireless carriers' radio spectrum bandwidth can be used.

5.8 There are at least two operating DAS networks in Canada, both in the City of Montreal. Both of these DAS networks are located within existing city utility corridors, attached to the existing utility and streetlight pole infrastructure. One of these networks is owned and operated by Le Group Videotron Ltee. ("Videotron"). The other is a partially completed network that DAScom and ExteNet are constructing in collaboration with a local fiber provider. Public Mobile is already using this network to deliver cellular service in Montreal.

5.9 In the United States, DAS networks have been successfully deployed in most major cities. Such networks typically utilize hydro and telephone poles.

5.10 DAS technology facilitates a more competitive market for wireless services because it is particularly attractive to new entrants who wish to launch new services quickly. Such entrants may have less radio spectrum bandwidth with which to work, may have fewer deployed transmission facilities and may face challenges in accessing existing tower infrastructure.

-14- 85

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 15 of 41

5.11 In 2008, the Canadian government allowed new entrants into the wireless market to bid for wireless licences. As The Globe and Mail recently reported, at that time, only 60 percent of Canadians were wireless users. Today, 72.5 percent of Canadians are consumers of wireless services. By the end of 2010, cell phone prices offered by new wireless carriers such as Public Mobile, Videotron, Wind and Mobilicity were over 60 percent less than the prices offered by the large incumbent carriers. In 2010 alone, this resulted in the migration of approximately 36 percent of residential wireline telephone customers to wireless substitutes. This trend is expected to accelerate. Incumbent telecoms are being forced to reduce prices in order to preserve their customer base: 4

6.0 The Toronto DAS Network

6.1 Public Mobile is a mobile wireless carrier that has been licensed by Industry Canada to provide mobile wireless services to customers in Toronto as well as in other geographic regions in Ontario and Québec. Public Mobile is also registered with the CRTC as a Canadian carrier. In 2009, Public Mobile determined that DAS technology was its preferred solution for delivering new mobile wireless services to Toronto residents and local businesses. Public Mobile selected ExteNet to develop a DAS network.

6.2 ExteNet, working with two underlying suppliers, DAScom and Cogeco Data Services Inc. ("Cogeco"), undertook to design, develop and implement the Toronto DAS Network, initially for use by Public Mobile in launching its new wireless services. ExteNet is a Canadian corporation that is registered with the CRTC as a reseller of telecommunications services. ExteNet and its parent company have significant experience in the design and construction of DAS networks.

6.3 The plan for the Toronto DAS Network involved DAScom constructing the approximately 790 node sites (in relation to what CANDAS believes are some 100,000 poles controlled by THESL and THESI) required to cover the City of Toronto and

14 The Globe and Mail Report on Business, April 4, 2011, "Canada's Newest Wireless Entrants are on the Attack"; this article is based on a report prepared by Convergence Consulting Group Ltd. See also The Globe and Mail articles dated April 6, 2011 and April 7, 2011 entitled, respectively, "Telus Delivers Low-key Launch of Clearnet Wireless" and "Telus Seeks Licensing Edge to Build New Network". Copies of these articles are included at Tab 9 of this Application.

-15- 86

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 16 of 41

Cogeco providing the approximately 1,000 kilometers of fiber cabling required to connect the nodes with Public Mobile's hub facilities and switching center. DAScom and Cogeco are both registered with the CRTC as Canadian carriers. DAScom was selected because of its experience in the Canadian fibre cabling and construction industry. Cogeco was selected because it already had a municipal access agreement with the City of Toronto that permitted it to utilize public rights-of-way as well as the required pole attachment agreements with THESL and THESI.

(a) Agreement with City of Toronto

6.4 In order to construct the Toronto DAS Network, the consent of the City of Toronto was required. The City agreed and entered into a Municipal Access Agreement for Telecommunication Installations with DAScom as of August 6, 2009 (the "Municipal Access Agreement"). Copies of this Agreement and the City of Toronto Staff Report ("Staff Report") that sought Council approval to enter into the Agreement are included at Tabs 10 and 11 of this Application, respectively. The Municipal Access Agreement is for an initial term of 15 years and gives DAScom access to City roads for the purpose of constructing, installing, operating and maintaining a telecommunications network, including wireless antennas, radios and power supply equipment.

6.5 The Municipal Access Agreement includes a number of express prohibitions, including the construction or erection of poles or other above ground structures (s. 3(1)(a)). It also restricts the installation of overhead cabling to locations where overhead cabling already exists (s. 3(2)). The Municipal Access Agreement also imposes a number of safety- related requirements, including requiring DAScom to comply with technical standards relating to wireless equipment prescribed by Industry Canada and the City of Toronto.

(b) Pole Access Agreements

6.6 Without access to existing power and lighting poles in the City of Toronto upon commercially reasonable terms and conditions, neither the Toronto DAS Network, nor any other DAS network deployment in Toronto, would be economically or technically feasible. Since DAS technology depends on low elevation attachment of nodes near fiber

-16-

87

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 17 of 41

optic cabling and electric power, as a practical matter, its components must be attached to existing poles.

6.7 The economic and environmental costs of creating a new corridor and erecting a duplicative system of poles along City of Toronto streets would be unacceptable, not only to investors, but also to the public. The economic costs would ultimately be borne by the very consumers who have already funded the capital cost of existing electric and telephone infrastructure. Moreover, given that both sides of most City streets are already occupied by various and differing support structures (telephone, electrical and lighting), there is simply no room for additional poles. In any event, construction of a duplicative system of poles within City rights-of-way is not permitted under the terms of the Municipal Access Agreement.

6.8 It is against this backdrop that in November 2008, ExteNet first approached THESL and THESI to obtain information regarding requirements for access to their poles for the purpose of "attaching wireline and wireless infrastructure to utility structures." I5 On November 13, 2008, THESL advised that while THESI already had wireless attachments on its poles, THESL did not, but would be prepared to permit wireless attachments. Subsequently, THESL's legal department forwarded its "standard pole attachment agreement" to ExteNet, noting in its cover email that "the current Pole Rental Rate is $22.35 per pole in use." 16 THESL also suggested that the basic terms of its standard pole attachment agreement were not negotiable.

6.9 Over several months in 2009, prior to entering into any pole access agreements, DAScom and ExteNet communicated and met with representatives of THESL and THESI regarding the overall scope and also the technical and operational details of the proposed Toronto DAS Network. During this time, DAScom and ExteNet provided THESL and THESI with detailed drawings and photographs of the proposed node installations. Subsequently, they constructed a full-sized prototype of the proposed node installation on a utility pole at DAScom's Toronto office parking lot in order to assist THESL and

15 Email from ExteNet to THESL, dated November 13, 2008 (Tab 12 hereto). 16 Email from THESL to ExteNet, dated November 14, 2008 (Tab 13 hereto).

- 17 - 88

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 18 of 41

THESI personnel in understanding how the DAS equipment assembly would co-exist with other attachments on a utility pole. Representatives of both THESL and THESI inspected the prototype and indicated that they had no objections or suggested changes. A photograph of this prototype is included as Tab 14 of this Application.

6.10 On July 20, 2009 representatives of ExteNet and Public Mobile met with Mr. David O'Brien, the then President and Chief Executive Officer of THESL, to discuss the Toronto DAS Network project, including Public Mobile's new wireless network. Mr. O'Brien expressed his support for the new wireless network.

6.11 Subsequently, DAScom entered into an Agreement for Licensed Occupancy of Support Structures with THESL, effective August 1, 2009 ("Distribution Pole Access Agreement"). DAScom also entered into an Agreement for Licensed Occupancy of Support Structures with THESI, effective September 4, 2009 ("Light Pole Access Agreement").

6.12 Copies of the Distribution Pole and Light Pole Access Agreements and descriptions of the detailed provisions thereof are not included with this Application because THESI and THESL required DAScom to sign Confidentiality Agreements as a precondition to providing copies of their standard form of access agreements. Moreover, both the Distribution Pole Access Agreement and the Light Pole Access Agreement prohibit DAScom from disclosing their terms to third parties, except with the consent of THESL or THESI, as the case may be.

6.13 The Applicant understands and believes that others, such as Cogeco, have entered into pole access agreements with THESL and THESI and are similarly bound, thus preventing them from disclosing the terms of their agreements.

6.14 DAScom submits that the Board should require all such agreements to be placed on the public record in this proceeding. There is no reason not to do so.

-18- 89

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 19 of 41

7.0 Course of Dealing with THESL

7.1 Very soon after the effective dates of the Distribution Pole and Light Pole Access Agreements, representatives of Cogeco, DAScom, ExteNet and THESL met to discuss the procedures that would be necessary to process the large number of attachment permit applications that Cogeco and DAScom would need to submit in order to carry out the Toronto DAS Network project. THESL advised DAScom, ExteNet and Cogeco that THESL's practice was to process applications for attachment permits within three to four weeks. This was considered to be a commercially reasonable turnaround time for such applications and comparable to turnaround times of utilities in other jurisdictions. In the ensuing months, these parties met regularly to review the status of attachment permitting.

7.2 On October 1, 2009, Mr. Anthony Haines succeeded Mr. O'Brien as THESL's Chief Executive Officer. Until shortly after Mr. Haines became THESL's new CEO, the processing of DAScom's attachment applications proceeded in a relatively timely maimer. For example, in September 2010, DAScom submitted 44 node attachment applications to THESL and, by November 13, 2009, had received 32 corresponding attachment permits. Soon thereafter, however, it became apparent that Cogeco's fiber attachment applications and DAScom's node attachment applications were not being processed within the three to four weeks timeframe that had been promised. The slow processing of Cogeco's fiber attachment applications was of particular concern and the Toronto DAS Network participants attempted to escalate these issues to higher levels of management within THESL.

7.3 On November 30, 2009, during a conference call, Mr. Haines questioned the appropriateness of any policy or regulation requiring THESL to allow attachment of telecommunications facilities on its poles. Mr. Haines indicated that he intended to confer with THESL's Board of Directors with respect to these issues and suggested that Cogeco, DAScom and ExteNet should explore how the Toronto DAS Network might be developed without reliance on THESL's poles.

-19- 90

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 20 of 41

7.4 On January 13, 2010, representatives of Public Mobile met with Mr. Haines and other representatives of THESL in an attempt to resolve the on-going problems with respect to delays in processing of the attachment permits, which delays threatened to severely impact Public Mobile's business plan. At the meeting, Mr. Haines stated that he was unaware of any wireless equipment mounted on THESL poles and would order the removal of such equipment if an internal investigation revealed that such attachments existed. This came at a time when THESL and THESI had already issued approximately 164 attachment permits; applications for another 104 node attachment permits were pending.

7.5 On January 14, 2010, a representative of THESL advised DAScom that THESL had: (i) stopped processing all Toronto DAS Network pole attachment applications, including Cogeco's fiber optic cable attachment applications; and (ii) ordered all work on DAScom's previously permitted attachments to cease, pending a review of THESL's policy on such attachments (the "Stop Work Order").

7.6 On January 22, 2010, representatives of DAScom and ExteNet met with Mr. Haines and other representatives of THESL to discuss the Stop Work Order. At this meeting, THESL stated that it had an unwritten policy against allowing wireless attachments on its poles and suggested that the actions and statements of THESL employees in respect to the Toronto DAS Network project, including the issuance of attachment permits, had been unauthorized. Following a detailed discussion of the Toronto DAS Network project, Mr. Haines undertook to review THESL's policies related to wireless telecommunications attachments with THESL's Board of Directors and get back to DAScom.

7.7 By separate letters dated February 5, 2010, each of THESL and THESI advised DAScom that they would continue to entertain and process pole attachment applications in accordance with the terms of the Distribution Pole and Light Pole Access Agreements, respectively. Copies of these letters are included as Tab 15 of this Application.

-20- 91

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 21 of 41

7.8 Shortly thereafter, at a meeting among representatives of DAScom, ExteNet and THESL, THESL responded to the concerns about the continuing problem of delays in processing permit applications by suggesting that DAScom and ExteNet should find another way to construct the Toronto DAS Network.

7.9 By February 22, 2010, there was a backlog of approximately 301 Cogeco applications and 244 DAScom attachment applications. In the period from January 11 to March 19, 2010, THESL did not process a single pole attachment application nor issue a single attachment permit, to either Cogeco or DAScom.

7.10 By June, 2010 and after over six months of construction, the Toronto DAS Network was still only partially completed. As a result of the continuing delays in permit processing and the uncertainty as to when the Toronto DAS Network would be 100 percent completed, Public Mobile decided to launch its new Toronto service using "temporary" Macro Cell Sites. Accordingly, Public Mobile, ExteNet and DAScom agreed to terminate arrangements for the committed use of the Toronto DAS Network by Public Mobile. Although Public Mobile is still interested in utilizing DAS technology for portions of its network in Toronto, it will not commit to do so unless and until it receives credible assurances, including assurances that THESL will grant timely and long-term pole access for node and fiber attachments.

8.0 The THESL Letter and the THESL/THESI Email

8.1 The THESL Letter, filed with the Board on August 13, 2010, advised that as a matter of policy, the attachment of wireless telecommunications equipment to THESL power poles would not be permitted. THESL raised a number of points to support its claim that the CCTA Order was never intended to apply to wireless attachments and, if it was, that it should no longer so apply. THESL's position may be summarized as follows:

(i) notwithstanding the actual wording of the CCTA Order, it was not intended to extend to wireless attachments;

-21- 92

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 22 of 41

(ii) utility poles are not essential for the deployment of wireless technology;

(iii) essential and scarce resources, such as power poles, should not be allocated to undertakings that have other alternatives;

(iv) wireless attachments impair operational efficiency and present incremental safety hazards to electricity distributors; and

(v) a utility's obligation of non-discriminatory access to its distribution system pertains only to access required by "generators, retailers and consumers for the purposes of electricity distribution."

8.2 To the Applicant's knowledge, the THESL Letter was the first time that THESL had raised concerns about safety hazards allegedly created by wireless attachments. Certainly, THESL had never raised these issues with DAScom or ExteNet. Moreover, it had entered into the Distribution Pole Access Agreement without reservation and had issued many node attachment permits, also without reservation.

8.3 On August 17, 2010 and subsequent to the THESL Letter, Public Mobile received an email from Mr. Lawrence Wilde ("THESL/THESI Email") advising that neither THESL nor THESI would enter into any agreements for access to their poles for the purpose of affixing wireless attachments. With respect to wireline attachments, the email stated as follows: "[IJf your intent is to gain access for the purpose of affixing wireline attachments to Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited poles please advise as to the nature of the attachments which you are contemplating and we will advise regarding our requirements." A copy of the THESL/THESI Email is included as Tab 16 of this Application.

8.4 The THESL Letter and the THESL/THESI Email were the first written articulation of THESL's and THESI's new policy prohibiting wireless attachments. These communications came one year after THESL and THESI had executed the Distribution Pole and Light Pole Access Agreements and after ExteNet, DAScom, and Public Mobile

-22- 93

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 23 of 41

had, collectively, invested more than $10 million in developing the Toronto DAS Network.

9.0 Termination of the Pole Access Agreements

9.1 By letter to DAScom dated September 28, 2010, THESI terminated the Light Pole Access Agreement at the end of its initial term; i.e., as of December 31, 2010 ("Termination Notice"). By further letter to DAScom dated January 20, 2011, THESI advised DAScom that it would be required to remove all wireless attachments in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Light Pole Access Agreement ("Removal Notice"). Copies of the Termination and Removal Notices are included as Tabs 17 and 18 of this Application, respectively.

9.2 THESI's refusal to renew the Light Pole Access Agreement suggests that THESL will also refuse to renew the Distribution Pole Access Agreement when it expires. This means that even if a portion of the Toronto DAS Network could be completed in a form that could be utilized by Public Mobile or other wireless carriers, it would become stranded when the initial term of the Distribution Pole Access Agreement expires.

9.3 The Termination and Removal Notices add an element of urgency to the situation. This is because THESI has expressed its intention to require DAScom to remove its attachments from THESI poles within the applicable time frames, failing which THESI will remove the attachments and charge DAScom for so doing.

9.4 In the MADD Order", the Board found that certain of THESI's street light assets fall within the meaning of "distribution" and/or "distribution system". Specifically, with respect to streetlighting poles, the Board found that where the distribution circuits are in the form of overhead lines, the associated poles are distribution assets because the primary purpose of the pole is related to the distribution of electricity. If the distribution circuits are buried underground, however, categorization depends on whether the circuits are located in a "mixed urban use setting" or in a "residential" setting. Poles in a

17 See para. 1.0(d) above.

-23-

94

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 24 of 41

residential setting, where circuits are buried underground, are likely to be used exclusively for streetlighting and, thus, are not distribution assets. Poles located in a mixed urban use setting where circuits are buried underground are likely to be used for both street lighting and the distribution of electricity and, thus, may be characterized as distribution assets. The Board also concluded that luminaires are not distribution assets no matter where they are located.

9.5 In the result, the Board approved the sale, to THESL, of those assets which it deemed to be distribution assets, conditional on THESL and THESI filing: (i) additional evidence that "sets out the revised transactions;" and (ii) a new asset valuation to be used by the Board for rate-making purposes (the Board declined to accept the valuation that was filed as part of the original application).

9.6 On January 31, 2011, THESL and THESI (and a related entity) filed "Additional Evidence Regarding the Transfer of Streetlighting Assets" with the Board ("Additional MADD Evidence"), a copy of which is included as Tab 19 of this Application.

9.7 The Additional MADD Evidence classified 40,274 of THESI's 54,674 streetlighting poles as "distribution" 18 . As distribution assets, these poles are now subject to the CCTA Order and, in consequence, THESL and THESI are now obligated to grant Canadian carriers who so request, access to these poles.

9.8 Many, if not most, of the THESI poles on which DAScom's wireless equipment is attached pursuant to the terms of the Light Pole Access Agreement have been deemed to be part of THESL's distribution system in accordance with the MADD Order. This means that such attachments are now governed by the Distribution Pole Access Agreement as opposed to the Light Pole Access Agreement. Accordingly, by letter dated February 24, 2011 (a copy of which is included as Tab 20 of this Application), DAScom notified THESI of its position that neither the Termination Notice nor the Removal Notices pertained to the 40,274 streetlighting poles that were now classified as distribution assets.

18 See Table 2, p. 14 of 21 of the Additional MADD Evidence.

-24-

95

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 25 of 41

9.9 By letter dated March 18, 2011, THESI responded, stating that:

(i) the Termination and the Renewal Notices pertain to all permits issued under the Light Pole Access Agreement;

(n) no street lighting poles had been transferred to THESL but, if such poles were transferred in the future, DAScom would be at liberty to apply to THESL under the Distribution Pole Access Agreement, to install any proposed attachments; and

(iii) THESI was prepared to extend the deadline for attachment removal and pole restoration to May 1, 2011, but not beyond.

A copy of the March 18, 2011 letter is included as Tab 21 of this Application.

10.0 Grounds

(a) Public Utilities vs. Private Corporations

10.1 A public utility is not in the same position as a commercial vendor. It is more akin to a public body entrusted with the management of assets for the benefit of the public. In a sense, an owner of a public utility holds the utility in trust for the benefit of the general public (or, at least, that portion of it resident in the city within which the utility is located) and not just for the utility's ratepayers. 19

10.2 The CRTC recognized the distinction between public and private corporations in 1974, in its first pole access case: 20

It is not disputed that the telephone poles erected by Bell are its property, but as herein noted, the use or enjoyment Bell has of this property is subject to certain limitations imposed by law in the public interest. We believe that when one devotes one's property to a use in which the public has an interest, one, in effect, grants to

19 Canada (Attorney General) v. Toronto (City) (1893), 23 S.C.R. 514. 20 Transvision (Magog) Inc. v. Bell Canada, [1975] C.T.C. 463 at 485.

-25- 96

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 26 of 41

the public an interest in that use, and must submit to be controlled by the public for the common good, to the extent of the interest one has thus created. We believe that Bell is in that position with respect to its telephone poles which cease, for this reason to be juris privati only. [emphasis added]

10.3 More recently, in a case involving THESL, the Court of Appeal for Ontario also noted the "important distinction" between private corporations and publicly regulated corporation:

At the heart of a regulator's rate-making authority lies the "regulatory compact" which involves balancing the interests of investors and consumers. In this regard, there is an important distinction between private corporations and publicly regulated corporations. With respect to the latter, in order to achieve the "regulatory compact", it is not unusual to have constraints imposed on the utilities that may place some restrictions on the board of directors. That is so because the directors of utility companies have an obligation not only to the company, but to the public at large.21 [emphasis added]

10.4 Having devoted its poles to a use in which the public has an interest, an electricity distributor must submit to being controlled by the public (i.e., the Board), for the common good. In this context, the common good or public interest would include avoiding the duplication of infrastructure, accommodating local government objectives and avoiding the impairment of competition in converging industries.

10.5 This very point was addressed by the New Brunswick Public Utility Commission in the NB Pole Access Case: 22

21 Toronto Hydro-Electric System Ltd. v. Ontario Energy Board, [2010] O.J. No. 1594 (C.A.) at para. 49. 22 Oral Ruling, October 27, 2005 Transcript.

- 26 - 97

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 27 of 41

It is clear that one of the overall purposes of the Act is to ensure the provision of electricity to residents of New Brunswick in a safe, reliable and economic manner. It is essential to these objectives that Disco utilize electric power poles. However, it would be uneconomic and wasteful if all utilities and persons seeking to provide services in New Brunswick were required to acquire their own easements and poles in areas already served by electric power poles. It would be appropriate to allow access to electric power poles to provide services provided it can be done without interference with the distribution system. In New Brunswick Disco and Aliant own virtually all the poles in the Disco operating area and they have joint use agreement with respect to poles. The Disco power poles are an essential service provided by Disco in delivering services pursuant to the Act. It is not in the public interest that there be a proliferation of poles. The arrangement between Disco and Aliant to share poles for attachment of their respective services is to be encouraged as being prudent and economical. The exclusion of Rogers from equivalent access to Disco's electric power poles is not in keeping with the provisions of the Act or in the public interest. [emphasis added]

(b) Breach of CCTA Order and Electricity Distribution Licences

10.6 The fact that utility assets are not juris privati and must be "controlled by the public for the public good" was recognized by the Ontario legislature when it conferred, on the OEB, the express jurisdiction to impose licence conditions requiring a licensee to enter into agreements with third parties "for the ... use of any ...plant owned or operated by the licensee."23 This provision empowers the Board to require electricity distributors to enter into user agreements with attachers. This power is similar to powers conferred on

23 OEB Act, ss. 70(2).

-27- 98

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 28 of 41

other provincial energy regulators and simply reflects the public nature of regulated utilities.24

10.7 The OEB relied on its statutory power when it issued the CCTA Order, thereby recognizing that Ontario electricity distributors have a public utility obligation to manage utility assets for the benefit of the public as a whole and not simply for the benefit of their ratepayers.

10.8 The CCTA Order amended the licences of all Ontario electricity distributors by requiring them to provide pole access to all Canadian carriers, as defined by the Telecommunications Act, and to all cable companies that operate in Ontario. The Telecommunications Act defines a "Canadian carrier" as an owner or operator of "transmission facilities" which, in turn, are defined to mean "any wire, cable, radio, optical or other electromagnetic system, or any similar technical system, for the transmission of intelligence between network termination points". [emphasis added] Accordingly, the owners and operators of wireless transmission facilities are considered to be Canadian carriers under the Telecommunications Act.

10.9 The CCTA Order does not distinguish between Canadian carriers that seek to attach wireline equipment and those that seek to attach wireless equipment.

10.10 The CCTA Order has not been set aside, varied or amended. The condition imposed by the CCTA Order on the licences of all electricity distributors continues to pertain.

24 See for example, subsection 70(1) of the British Columbia Utilities Commission Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 473, which provides as follows: "On application and after a hearing, the commission may make an order directing a public utility to allow a person, other than a public utility, to use the electricity transmission facilities of the public utility if the commission finds that (a) the person and the public utility have failed to agree on the use of the facilities or on the conditions or compensation for their use, (b) the use of the facilities will not prevent the public utility or other users from performing their duties or result in any substantial detriment to their service, and (c) the public interest requires the use of the facilities by the person."

-28- 99

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 29 of 41

(c) Unjust Discrimination and Undue Preference

10.11 As is set out below, there is no question that THESL's refusal to permit wireless attachments discriminates unjustly. Access is granted to cable attachers. Access is granted to wireline attachers, but not to wireless attachers. And, access is granted to some wireless attachers, but not DAScom.

10.12 A public utility with a monopoly over services or facilities of fundamental importance to the public has a common law obligation to provide such services or grant access to such facilities to all who request it and are willing to pay the prescribed rates, without unjust discrimination.

10.13 The British Columbia Supreme Court aptly summarized these principles as follows: 25

The obligation of a public utility or other body having a practical monopoly on the supply of a particular commodity or service of fundamental importance to the public has long been clear. It is to supply its product to all who seek it for a reasonable price and without unreasonable discrimination between those who are similarly situated or who fall into one class of consumers. The great utility systems supplying power, telephone and transportation services now so familiar may be of relatively recent origin, but special obligations to supply service have been imposed from the very earliest days of the common law upon bodies in like case, such as carriers, innkeepers, wharfingers and ferry operators. This has been true in England and in the common-law jurisdictions throughout the world. In Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113, in the Supreme Court of the United States, the historical roots of this principle were examined and they have been applied in the United

25 Chastain v. British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority (1973), 32 D.L.R. (3 d) 443 at 454 (B.C.S.C.); see also Bell Canada v. Challenge Communication Ltd., [1979] 1 F.C. 857 (C.A.); leave to appeal refused (June 6, 1978, S.C.C.) ("Challenge").

- 29 - 100

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 30 of 41

States. In Canada the law has followed the same path. [emphasis added]

10.14 It is important to note that a public utility's obligation to provide non-discriminatory service and access exists as a matter of common law. It is not dependent on the existence of a contractual obligation: 26

That a public utility was at common law compelled to treat all consumers alike, to charge one no more than the others and to supply the utility as a matter of duty and not as a result of a contract, seems clear. 27

10.15 The prohibition against undue discrimination by public utilities cannot be displaced by operation of statute, except by express language. 28 Moreover, this prohibition exists outside of any statutory expression. 29

10.16 Once discrimination is shown to exist (as in this case) the onus shifts to the utility as a matter of law to justify that discrimination. The Federal Court of Canada stated this principle in Challenge30 which, like this case, pertained to the wireless telecommunications sector. THESL has offered no rational explanation to justify its abrupt change in policy.

10.17 This concept of onus was an important aspect of the Board's recent decision involving THESL and its refusal to connect two large condominiums unless they agreed that the smart meters in those buildings would be provided exclusively by THESL and not by

26 St. Lawrence Rendering Co. v. Cornwall (City), 1951 CarswellOnt 74 at para. 39 (H.C.J.). 27 Canada (Attorney General) v. Toronto (City) (1893), 23 S.C.R. 514; Scottish Ontario and Manitoba Land Co. v. Toronto (City) (1899), 26 0.A.R. 345 at p. 349; Hamilton (City) v. Hamilton Distillery Co. (1907), 38 S.C.R. 239 at p. 254. 28 See: E.A. Driedger, Construction of- Statutes, 2nd ed., (Butterworths, 1983) at p. 213, citing Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. of Can. v. T. Eaton Co., [1956] S.C.R. 610, at p. 614. See also Slaight Communications Inc. v. Davidson, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 1038 at 1077 per Lamer J.: "...in the absence of a clear provision to the contrary, the legislator should not be assumed to have intended to alter the pre-existing ordinary rules of common law". 29 Chastain, supra, footnote 25; see also Minister of Justice for the Dominion of Canada v. Levis, [1919] A.C. 505 at 513 (H.L.) 30 Challenge, supra, footnote 25; CNCP Telecommunications: Interconnection with Bell Canada, CRTC Decision 79-11; Alabama Power Company v. Federal Power Commission, 511 F.2d 383 at p. 391 (U.S.C.A, D.C. Cir., 1974).

-30- 101

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 31 of 41

competing suppliers31 . The Board held that this practice was contrary to the Electricity Act, 1998 ("Electricity Act") the Distribution Service Code ("DSC") and THESL's own licence.

10.18 What was particularly important in the Smart Meter Case was the Board's analysis of the onus a utility must satisfy when refusing to connect. The Board concluded that such refusal must be statutorily justified as otherwise permitted by the DSC. As the Board held:

It is significant that section 28 of the Electricity Act does not provide any justifications for the refusal to connect. It merely states two conditions, both of which are met by both the developments in this proceeding. There are justifications for refusal to connect set out in the DSC. The Board believes those should be narrowly interpreted. A utility refusing connection on the basis of the Code must clearly satisfy the Board that those conditions exist. This responsibility is also reflected in Toronto Hydro's distribution licence, which provides that an offer to connect shall be fair and reasonable and the utility should not refuse to connect unless it is permitted to do so by the OEB Act, or a regulation or any codes. 32

10.19 CANDAS submits that these principles also apply in this proceeding. Not only is there an onus on a utility to justify any termination or refusal to connect, the termination or refusal must also be in strict compliance with all statutory and other applicable requirements, such as the DSC. The only conceivable justification offered by THESL is a vague reference to a safety issue. This is not sufficient for THESL to discharge its onus.

3 EB 2009-0308, Decision and Order dated January 27, 2010 ("Smart Meter Case"). 32 Smart Meter Case, supra, para. 40. The Board's footnote at the conclusion of this paragraph reference to THESL's Electricity Distribution Licence, ED-2002-0497 at s. 7.

-31- 102

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 32 of 41

10.20 Notwithstanding their legal obligation (as set out in the foregoing paragraphs) to provide non-discriminatory access to all Canadian telecommunication carriers who are prepared to pay the Board-approved rate, some Ontario electricity distributors are now engaging in conduct that unjustly discriminates against certain wireless attachers and confers an undue preference on themselves or on related parties.

10.21 For example, although the THESL Letter articulates a blanket, "no wireless" policy, THESL is allowing the Toronto Transit Commission ("TTC") access to its poles in respect of the attachment of 750 wireless microwave transmitters that the TTC uses in connection with its bus service. 33 Presumably, THESL is not requiring the TTC to remove these transmitters. This conduct discriminates among wireless attachers — some, like the TTC, are granted access, while others, like members of CANDAS, are not. This conduct also confers an undue preference on an entity that is related to THESL.

10.22 THESL is also using its own facilities for wireless purposes. This is evidenced by the fact that it holds a number of Industry Canada "radio station" licences, many of which pertain to wireless equipment that is attached to its poles. Such conduct unduly discriminates against wireless carriers. It also confers an undue preference on THESL.

10.23 The Applicants do not know the reasons why at least one Ontario distributor, other than THESL, has adopted a "no wireless" policy. The Applicants do know that THESL is justifying its "no wireless" policy on the grounds of safety. THESL's willingness, however, to attach its own wireless equipment and that of the TTC puts the lie to its claims that wireless attachments pose certain electrical safety "risks". If THESL is able to see its way clear to attaching its own wireless devices and those of the TTC, one might well ask whether safety of wireless attachments is a real issue.

10.24 The fact that THESL willingly entered into the Distribution Pole Access Agreement with DAScom and then, for over a year, facilitated the attachment of DAScom's wireless equipment to its poles, is further evidence that THESL's expression of safety concerns merely amount to rationalizations for its discriminatory conduct. It is noteworthy that

33 See Toronto Transit Commission v. The Minister of Finance, 2009 CanLII 28407 ON S.C.

-32- 103

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 33 of 41

THESL and THESI received and processed many applications for wireless attachments in 2009 and throughout much of 2010 without raising any generalized safety concerns about wireless attachments with DAScom or ExteNet.

10.25 If any electricity distributor in Ontario is of the view that pole access should not be available to certain types of customers or equipment attachments, its remedy is to request the Board to vary the CCTA Order. It may not simply deny access unilaterally and, in so doing, unduly discriminate among categories of attachers and attachments in a manner that is not countenanced by the CCTA Order. If a distributor identifies concerns regarding safety that are unique to certain types of wireless attachments, it is obliged to bring these to the attention of the Board and request that the CCTA Order be varied to exclude the offending carriers. It may not, as THESL has done, take unilateral action to address the alleged concerns and in so doing, unduly discriminate among categories of attachers and attachments in a manner that is not countenanced by the CCTA Order.

(d) Anti - Competitive Behaviour

10.26 It is well established that a regulated monopoly, with control of an essential facility, may not refuse to supply such facility or create an unfair advantage by engaging in discriminatory behaviour in order to undermine competitors. 34 The OEB quite clearly

relied on this principle in the 2010 THESL compliance decision: 35

When a company is a sole supplier of an essential product, such as electricity, it faces special responsibility in terms of supplying customers. This is one of the most fundamental principles and obligations that face a public utility in this county.

10.27 In Canada, the CRTC has relied on the essential facility doctrine since the first pole attachment decision in 1974 where the CRTC noted that certain utility assets, such as electricity utility poles have a public interest component and the public has an interest in

34 The United States Supreme Court first articulated the doctrine in United States v. Terminal Railroad Ass'n, 224 U.S. 383 (1912). See also: Otter Tail Power Company v. United States, 410 U.S. 366 (1973). 35 EB-2009-0308, Decision and Order, at para. 38.

-33- 104

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 34 of 41

their use. 36 The CRTC expanded this concept in its 1979 decision concerning an application by CNCP seeking access to the facilities of Bell Canada in order to provide competitive, long-distance service. In light of the public interest in a competitive communications industry, the Director of Investigation and Research ("Director") (now the Commissioner of Competition) intervened in the application in support of CNCP. In its decision, the CRTC agreed with the Director's submission, as follows: 37

Based on this and other more recent authorities, the Director asserted that the principal had been established "that regulated companies with control of essential facilities may not refuse to supply us such facilities or create an unfair advantage through discriminatory tariffs to undermine competitors". The Commission agrees with this approach.

10.28 Like CNCP, the case now before the Board also raises public interests issues about competition in telecommunications. The issuance of licences in 2008 to new, lower cost wireless carriers signalled the federal government's commitment to fostering competition in this sector. The policies of THESL and other electricity distributors prohibiting wireless attachments can only serve to limit competition.

10.29 Applying the foregoing principles to the facts at hand:

(i) power poles are essential facilities; both the OEB and the NBPUC have so determined;

(ii) electricity distributors have a virtual monopoly on pole infrastructure in Ontario;

(iii) the successful development of a DAS network depends on the ability to attach DAS equipment to existing poles within existing linear corridors; the need to acquire new rights-of-way and

36 Transvision (Magog) Inc. v. Bell Canada, [1975] C.T.C. 463 at 485. 37 CNCP Telecommunications: Interconnection with Bell Canada, Telecom Decision CRTC 79-11 at 124.

-34- 105

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 35 of 41

construct new pole infrastructure would render a DAS project impractical and unfeasible;

(iv) cable companies and wireline telecommunications companies (who both have access to power poles) compete with wireless telecommunication companies and vice versa; moreover, the affiliates of electricity distributors also engage in telecommunications activities; 38'39

(v) the development of DAS networks is essential to the creation of a competitive wireless telecommunications market in Canada; and

(vi) there have been no findings by regulators or courts that the attachment of wireless equipment on power poles poses an unacceptable safety risk or otherwise impairs functionality.

(e) Ontario Utilities are Acting with Unfettered Discretion

10.30 The CCTA Order mandated pole access for all Canadian carriers at a prescribed rate of $22.35 per pole per year. The Board refrained from imposing any other terms and conditions of access, preferring to leave the issue to be negotiated among the parties. ° Ultimately, while some parties did negotiate private access agreements, the Board never revisited the issue and never promulgated standard terms and conditions.

10.31 In the result, electricity distributors have enjoyed completely unfettered discretion in deciding on the terms and conditions that should govern access to their poles. This has led to a patchwork of arrangements that differ from utility to utility and, it appears, attacher to attacher. More troubling, perhaps, is that it has allowed distributors to impose on attachers what, in some cases, are onerous requirements. As the access agreements

38 See para. 3.10 above. See also CCTA Order at p. 7 where the Board stated as follows: "In addition, an increasing number of telecommunication providers are entering the market to compete with incumbent telephone company providing voice and data services. A number intervened in this proceeding and by virtue of the settlement agreement will have access to the poles in question. Finally, in a number of major markets the Ontario electricity distributors have established their own affiliates to offer telecommunication services." 39 Of the licensed electricity distributors in Ontario today, approximately 12 have telecommunications affiliates. 40 See paragraphs 3.16-3.17 above.

-35- 106

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 36 of 41

offered by electricity distributors are typically not negotiated in any meaningful way, carriers such as DAScom, who wish to develop their own communications networks, have no choice but to accept the terms and conditions that are unilaterally imposed by the utility.

10.32 Once an access agreement has been executed, the attacher continues to be at the mercy of the distributor with respect to matters related to:

(i) the timeframes within which applications are processed and Make Ready Work is carried out by the utility;

(ii) the engineering and other requirements that are imposed by the utility; and

(iii) the rejection of attachment applications.

10.33 The course of dealing between THESL and DAScom and Cogeco in connection with the Toronto DAS Network project (described in section 7.0 above) aptly illustrates the problem. Although pole access is a mandated and rate-regulated "service" in Ontario, utilities have the ability to frustrate, in a myriad of ways, those who seek such access.

10.34 The need for transparent and equitable terms and conditions of pole access was the impetus for a report and order ("Report") issued on April 7, 2011 41 by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission ("FCC"). 42 The Report comprehensively revises the FCC's pole attachment rules by removing barriers to the deployment of wireline and wireless services in order to "promote competition and increase the availability of robust, affordable telecommunications and advanced services to consumers throughout the nation". 43 A copy of the Report is included at Tab 22 of this Application.

41 FCC 11-50, Report and Order on Order on Reconsideration, April 7, 2011. 42 Section 224 of the United States Telecommunications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 151, gives the FCC the jurisdiction to mandate attachments on telephone and electricity poles and to set the terms and conditions of such access, except in circumstances where an individual state has chosen to exercise its option to regulate matters. 43 Report, para. 1

-36- 107

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 37 of 41

10.35 In commenting on the need for new access rules, the FCC stated as follows: 44

In its efforts to identify barriers to affordable telecommunications and broadband services, the Commission has recognized that lack of reliable, timely, and affordable access to physical infrastructure — particularly utility poles — is often a significant barrier to deploying wireline and wireless services. There are several reasons for this. First, the process and timeline for negotiating access to poles varies across the utility companies that own this key infrastructure. The absence of fixed timelines and the potential for delay creates uncertainty that deters investment. Second, if a pole owner does not comply with applicable requirements, the party requesting access may have limited remedies; because of time constraints, cost, or the need to maintain a working relationship with the pole owner, it may not wish to pursue the enforcement process. Third, the wide disparity in pole rental rates distorts service providers' decisions regarding deployment and offering of advanced services. For example, providers that pay lower pole rates may be deterred from offering services, such as high-capacity links to wireless towers, that could fall into a separate regulatory category and therefore risk having a higher pole rental fee apply to the provider's entire network. [emphasis added]

10.36 A regulatory framework where terms and conditions of pole access are matters to be negotiated between a utility and the attacher does not work. The FCC recognized this in its Report: 45

The record in this proceeding demonstrates that the current framework often results in negotiation processes that may be so

44 Report, para. 3. 45 Report, para. 6.

-37- 108

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 38 of 41

prolonged, unpredictable, and costly that they impose unreasonable costs on attachers and may create inefficiencies by deterring market entry.

10.37 In the result, the FCC adopted a number of rules aimed at removing barriers to entry. These include a rule that establishes a four-stage timeline for granting access (with a maximum timeframe of up to 148 days) and a rule that requires an electricity distributor who rejects a request for attachment to explain the reasons why, in relation to capacity, safety, reliability or engineering concerns. 46

10.38 The Applicant requests that the Board establish well-defined and equitable terms and conditions of access, similar to those adopted by the FCC. At a minimum, such terms and conditions should:

(i) establish commercially reasonable procedures (including a timeline) for the processing of applications for attachment permits and the performance of Make Ready Work;

(ii) establish technical attachment requirements, by reference to existing legislation that already "occupies the field"; and

(iii) establish a standard form of licensed occupancy agreement that provides for attachment permits with terms of at least 15 years from the date of attachment and that includes commercially reasonable renewal rights.

11.0 Interim Orders

11.1 CANDAS seeks interim relief to preserve the status quo, pending final action on this Application. In particular, CANDAS requests that no distributor be permitted to implement the sort of "no-wireless" policy articulated in the THESL Letter unless and until the Board determines that the CCTA order does not and should not pertain to

46 Report, para. 8.

-38- 109

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 39 of 41

wireless attachments. CANDAS also asks that THESL and/or THESI be directed not to remove any wireless equipment from the 40,274 streetlighting poles that are now classified "distribution", as a consequence of the MADD Order.

11.2 CANDAS's request for interim relief meets the criteria established by the Supreme Court of Canada in Manitoba v. Metropolitan Stores Ltd. 47 An applicant for interim relief must meet the following three criteria: (i) there is a serious issue to be decided by the tribunal; (ii) the applicant would suffer irreparable harm if interim relief were denied; and (iii) the balance of convenience supports the grant of the requested relief, taking into consideration the public interest.

11.3 There can be no doubt that this Application raises serious issues such as whether THESL has breached the CCTA Order, whether access to power poles by all Canadian carriers is in the public interest and, generally, whether THESL's conduct has had and, if left unchecked, would continue to have an adverse impact on competition in the Ontario telecommunications sector.

11.4 Irreparable harm is harm that cannot be quantified. In this case, the harm to the members of CANDAS that would flow from the implementation of THESL's "no-wireless" policy would indeed be unquantifiable. If members of the public have no choice other than to subscribe to wireless services provided by wireless carriers who rely on traditional Macro Cell Site technology, the lost opportunity created by such consumer choices (or lack thereof) simply cannot be recouped.

11.5 The balance of convenience favours the status quo. Should CANDAS succeed on this Application, any wireless equipment already installed on THESL's or THESI's poles would be available for use by DAScom and ExteNet. On the other hand, were THESL and THESI permitted to remove the already attached equipment but, ultimately, were ordered to permit such attachments, the resulting delays and waste would be significant.

47 [1987] 1 S.C.R. 110.

- 39 - 110

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 40 of 41

11.6 The facts of this case meet the criteria for the granting of interim relief It is, accordingly, in the public interest for the Board to grant the interim relief that CANDAS seeks.

12.0 Costs

12.1 In the Smart Meter Case, the Board ordered THESL to pay the costs of all parties, including the Board's. CANDAS submits that THESL should also be directed to pay all parties' costs of this application. Here, as in the Smart Meter Case, THESL has unilaterally refused access in clear violation of the DSC, THESL's own licence and the CCTA Order.

13.0 Evidence

13.1 CANDAS relies on the Ontario Energy Board Act, 1998, S.O. 1998, c. 15, sched. B, as amended, including without limitation, sections 1, 4(2), 19(1), 19(4), 19(6), 21(7), 23(1), 70(1.1), 70(2)(c) and 74.

13.2 The Applicant will also rely on such evidence as may be filed by it in support of this Application as counsel may advise and the Board may permit.

April 21, 2011 FRASER MILNER CASGRAIN LLP 77 King Street, Suite 400 Toronto Dominion Centre Toronto, ON M5K ()Al Fax: (416) 863-4592

Helen T. Newland Telephone: (416) 863-4471 helen.newlandafmc-law. corn

Michael D. Schafler Telephone: (416) 863-4457 michael.schaflergfmc-law.corn

Solicitors for the Applicant

-40- 111

Application of CANDAS Filed: 21-04-2011 Page 41 of 41 TO: Ms. Kirsten Walli Board Secretary Ontario Energy Board

AND TO: All Licensed Electricity Distributors