Forest Insect Pests and Their Signs 158 6
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution
INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 20, No. 3-4, September-December, 2006 165 The beetle fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and distribution Stewart B. Peck Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada stewart_peck@carleton. ca Abstract. The beetle fauna of the island of Dominica is summarized. It is presently known to contain 269 genera, and 361 species (in 42 families), of which 347 are named at a species level. Of these, 62 species are endemic to the island. The other naturally occurring species number 262, and another 23 species are of such wide distribution that they have probably been accidentally introduced and distributed, at least in part, by human activities. Undoubtedly, the actual numbers of species on Dominica are many times higher than now reported. This highlights the poor level of knowledge of the beetles of Dominica and the Lesser Antilles in general. Of the species known to occur elsewhere, the largest numbers are shared with neighboring Guadeloupe (201), and then with South America (126), Puerto Rico (113), Cuba (107), and Mexico-Central America (108). The Antillean island chain probably represents the main avenue of natural overwater dispersal via intermediate stepping-stone islands. The distributional patterns of the species shared with Dominica and elsewhere in the Caribbean suggest stages in a dynamic taxon cycle of species origin, range expansion, distribution contraction, and re-speciation. Introduction windward (eastern) side (with an average of 250 mm of rain annually). Rainfall is heavy and varies season- The islands of the West Indies are increasingly ally, with the dry season from mid-January to mid- recognized as a hotspot for species biodiversity June and the rainy season from mid-June to mid- (Myers et al. -
A New Oriental Genus of Bostrichid Beetle
European Journal of Taxonomy 189: 1–12 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2016.189 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2016 · Liu et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C05A64BE-EF55-4761-BAEF-14A0DDF43691 A new Oriental genus of bostrichid beetle (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae: Xyloperthini), a new synonym and a lectotype designation for Octodesmus episternalis (Lesne, 1901) Lan-Yu LIU1,*, Roger A. BEAVER2 & Sunisa SANGUANSUB3 1 Department of Science Communication, National Pingtung University, No.4-18, Minsheng Rd, Pingtung City, Pingtung County 90049, Taiwan. 2 161/2 Mu 5, Soi Wat Pranon, T. Donkaew, A. Maerim, Chiangmai 50180, Thailand. 3 Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture at Kamphaeng Saen, Kasetsart University, Kamphaeng Saen, Nakhonpathom 73140, Thailand. *Corresponding author: [email protected] 2 [email protected] 3 [email protected] 1 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:8A4ECE7C-2607-440D-B1BC-6E3B05EF02BB 2 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:EEF5C471-ECFB-4786-8E2F-13C5B5EC4F0D 3 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:65EBEA67-515A-4CC7-AE93-DAD47765971E Abstract. A new genus and species of bostrichid beetle, Octomeristes gen. nov. and Octomeristes pusillus gen. et sp. nov., in the tribe Xyloperthini is described from litchi (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) wood in Thailand. The genus is compared to Octodesmus Lesne, 1901, the only other xyloperthine genus with eight-segmented antennae, and to the xyloperthine genera, Xylion Lesne, 1901, Xylionulus Lesne, 1901 and Xylobosca Lesne, 1901. A new combination, Octomeristes minutissimus (Lesne, 1932) comb. nov., is transferred from Octodesmus Lesne, 1901. A lectotype is designated for Octodesmus episternalis Lesne, 1901, the type species of Octodesmus. -
The Mcguire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity
Supplemental Information All specimens used within this study are housed in: the McGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity (MGCL) at the Florida Museum of Natural History, Gainesville, USA (FLMNH); the University of Maryland, College Park, USA (UMD); the Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle in Paris, France (MNHN); and the Australian National Insect Collection in Canberra, Australia (ANIC). Methods DNA extraction protocol of dried museum specimens (detailed instructions) Prior to tissue sampling, dried (pinned or papered) specimens were assigned MGCL barcodes, photographed, and their labels digitized. Abdomens were then removed using sterile forceps, cleaned with 100% ethanol between each sample, and the remaining specimens were returned to their respective trays within the MGCL collections. Abdomens were placed in 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes with the apex of the abdomen in the conical end of the tube. For larger abdomens, 5 mL microcentrifuge tubes or larger were utilized. A solution of proteinase K (Qiagen Cat #19133) and genomic lysis buffer (OmniPrep Genomic DNA Extraction Kit) in a 1:50 ratio was added to each abdomen containing tube, sufficient to cover the abdomen (typically either 300 µL or 500 µL) - similar to the concept used in Hundsdoerfer & Kitching (1). Ratios of 1:10 and 1:25 were utilized for low quality or rare specimens. Low quality specimens were defined as having little visible tissue inside of the abdomen, mold/fungi growth, or smell of bacterial decay. Samples were incubated overnight (12-18 hours) in a dry air oven at 56°C. Importantly, we also adjusted the ratio depending on the tissue type, i.e., increasing the ratio for particularly large or egg-containing abdomens. -
Report-VIC-Croajingolong National Park-Appendix A
Croajingolong National Park, Victoria, 2016 Appendix A: Fauna species lists Family Species Common name Mammals Acrobatidae Acrobates pygmaeus Feathertail Glider Balaenopteriae Megaptera novaeangliae # ~ Humpback Whale Burramyidae Cercartetus nanus ~ Eastern Pygmy Possum Canidae Vulpes vulpes ^ Fox Cervidae Cervus unicolor ^ Sambar Deer Dasyuridae Antechinus agilis Agile Antechinus Dasyuridae Antechinus mimetes Dusky Antechinus Dasyuridae Sminthopsis leucopus White-footed Dunnart Felidae Felis catus ^ Cat Leporidae Oryctolagus cuniculus ^ Rabbit Macropodidae Macropus giganteus Eastern Grey Kangaroo Macropodidae Macropus rufogriseus Red Necked Wallaby Macropodidae Wallabia bicolor Swamp Wallaby Miniopteridae Miniopterus schreibersii oceanensis ~ Eastern Bent-wing Bat Muridae Hydromys chrysogaster Water Rat Muridae Mus musculus ^ House Mouse Muridae Rattus fuscipes Bush Rat Muridae Rattus lutreolus Swamp Rat Otariidae Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus ~ Australian Fur-seal Otariidae Arctocephalus forsteri ~ New Zealand Fur Seal Peramelidae Isoodon obesulus Southern Brown Bandicoot Peramelidae Perameles nasuta Long-nosed Bandicoot Petauridae Petaurus australis Yellow Bellied Glider Petauridae Petaurus breviceps Sugar Glider Phalangeridae Trichosurus cunninghami Mountain Brushtail Possum Phalangeridae Trichosurus vulpecula Common Brushtail Possum Phascolarctidae Phascolarctos cinereus Koala Potoroidae Potorous sp. # ~ Long-nosed or Long-footed Potoroo Pseudocheiridae Petauroides volans Greater Glider Pseudocheiridae Pseudocheirus peregrinus -
Home Pre-Fire Moth Species List by Species
Species present before fire - by species Scientific Name Common Name Family Abantiades aphenges Hepialidae Abantiades hyalinatus Mustard Ghost Moth Hepialidae Abantiades labyrinthicus Hepialidae Acanthodela erythrosema Oecophoridae Acantholena siccella Oecophoridae Acatapaustus leucospila Nolidae Achyra affinitalis Cotton Web Spinner Crambidae Aeolochroma mniaria Geometridae Ageletha hemiteles Oecophoridae Aglaosoma variegata Notodontidae Agriophara discobola Depressariidae Agrotis munda Brown Cutworm Noctuidae Alapadna pauropis Erebidae Alophosoma emmelopis Erebidae Amata nigriceps Erebidae Amelora demistis Pointed Cape Moth Geometridae Amelora sp. Cape Moths Geometridae Antasia flavicapitata Geometridae Anthela acuta Common Anthelid Moth Anthelidae Anthela ferruginosa Anthelidae Anthela repleta Anthelidae Anthela sp. Anthelidae Anthela varia Variable Anthelid Anthelidae Antipterna sp. Oecophoridae Ardozyga mesochra Gelechiidae Ardozyga sp. Gelechiidae Ardozyga xuthias Gelechiidae Arhodia lasiocamparia Pink Arhodia Geometridae Arrade destituta Erebidae Arrade leucocosmalis Erebidae Asthenoptycha iriodes Tortricidae Asura lydia Erebidae Azelina biplaga Geometridae Barea codrella Oecophoridae Calathusa basicunea Nolidae Calathusa hypotherma Nolidae Capusa graodes Geometridae Capusa sp. Geometridae Carposina sp. Carposinidae Casbia farinalis Geometridae Casbia sp. Geometridae Casbia tanaoctena Geometridae Catacometes phanozona Oecophoridae Catoryctis subparallela Xyloryctidae Cernia amyclaria Geometridae Chaetolopha oxyntis Geometridae Chelepteryx -
Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas
Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas Neal L. Evenhuis, Lucius G. Eldredge, Keith T. Arakaki, Darcy Oishi, Janis N. Garcia & William P. Haines Pacific Biological Survey, Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817 Final Report November 2010 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Islands Fish & Wildlife Office Honolulu, Hawaii Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 2 BISHOP MUSEUM The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai’i 96817–2704, USA Copyright© 2010 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America Contribution No. 2010-015 to the Pacific Biological Survey Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 5 Background ..................................................................................................................... 7 General History .............................................................................................................. 10 Previous Expeditions to Pagan Surveying Terrestrial Arthropods ................................ 12 Current Survey and List of Collecting Sites .................................................................. 18 Sampling Methods ......................................................................................................... 25 Survey Results .............................................................................................................. -
Phylogenomics Reveals Major Diversification Rate Shifts in The
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/517995; this version posted January 11, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. 1 Phylogenomics reveals major diversification rate shifts in the evolution of silk moths and 2 relatives 3 4 Hamilton CA1,2*, St Laurent RA1, Dexter, K1, Kitching IJ3, Breinholt JW1,4, Zwick A5, Timmermans 5 MJTN6, Barber JR7, Kawahara AY1* 6 7 Institutional Affiliations: 8 1Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA 9 2Department of Entomology, Plant Pathology, & Nematology, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 10 83844 USA 11 3Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK 12 4RAPiD Genomics, 747 SW 2nd Avenue #314, Gainesville, FL 32601. USA 13 5Australian National Insect Collection, CSIRO, Clunies Ross St, Acton, ACT 2601, Canberra, 14 Australia 15 6Department of Natural Sciences, Middlesex University, The Burroughs, London NW4 4BT, UK 16 7Department of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725, USA 17 *Correspondence: [email protected] (CAH) or [email protected] (AYK) 18 19 20 Abstract 21 The silkmoths and their relatives (Bombycoidea) are an ecologically and taxonomically 22 diverse superfamily that includes some of the most charismatic species of all the Lepidoptera. 23 Despite displaying some of the most spectacular forms and ecological traits among insects, 24 relatively little attention has been given to understanding their evolution and the drivers of 25 their diversity. -
Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring Within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘I: Synthesis Report
Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Prepared by Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Surveying for Terrestrial Arthropods (Insects and Relatives) Occurring within the Kahului Airport Environs, Maui, Hawai‘i: Synthesis Report Francis G. Howarth, David J. Preston, and Richard Pyle Hawaii Biological Survey Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817 USA Prepared for EKNA Services Inc. 615 Pi‘ikoi Street, Suite 300 Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96814 and State of Hawaii, Department of Transportation, Airports Division Bishop Museum Technical Report 58 Honolulu, Hawaii January 2012 Bishop Museum Press 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i Copyright 2012 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America ISSN 1085-455X Contribution No. 2012 001 to the Hawaii Biological Survey COVER Adult male Hawaiian long-horned wood-borer, Plagithmysus kahului, on its host plant Chenopodium oahuense. This species is endemic to lowland Maui and was discovered during the arthropod surveys. Photograph by Forest and Kim Starr, Makawao, Maui. Used with permission. Hawaii Biological Report on Monitoring Arthropods within Kahului Airport Environs, Synthesis TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents …………….......................................................……………...........……………..…..….i. Executive Summary …….....................................................…………………...........……………..…..….1 Introduction ..................................................................………………………...........……………..…..….4 -
A Review of the Powderpost Beetle Genera Xylothrips Lesne, 1901 and Calophagus Lesne, 1902 (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae: Bostrichinae: Xyloperthini)
European Journal of Taxonomy 746: 130–147 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2021.746.1325 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2021 · Liu L.-Y. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Research article urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D6AAF507-AC02-47E8-95DB-47B936E625BC A review of the powderpost beetle genera Xylothrips Lesne, 1901 and Calophagus Lesne, 1902 (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae: Bostrichinae: Xyloperthini) Lan-Yu LIU Department of Science Communication, National Pingtung University, No.1, Linsen Rd, Pingtung City, Pingtung County 90049, Taiwan. Email: [email protected] urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:2A7CCDB9-5AA5-4C96-821F-64867C4E29C0 Abstract. This paper reviews the genera Xylothrips Lesne, 1901 and Calophagus Lesne, 1902, and their species, and proposes that Calophagus should be reinstated as a full genus from a subgenus of Xylothrips (contra Borowski & Węgrzynowicz 2019). The genera and their included species are diagnosed and redescribed, and a summary of information on the distribution and biology of all species is provided. The importance of characters of the antennal club and pronotum in separating the two genera is stressed. A key to the two genera and the two species of Xylothrips is provided. Keywords. Review, Xylothrips, Calophagus, reinstatement. Liu L.-Y. 2021. A review of the powderpost beetle genera Xylothrips Lesne, 1901 and Calophagus Lesne, 1902 (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae: Bostrichinae: Xyloperthini). European Journal of Taxonomy 746: 130–147. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2021.746.1325 Introduction The tribe Xyloperthini Lesne, 1921 is the most species-rich in Bostrichidae Latreille, 1802, and currently includes 33 genera (Borowski & Węgrzynowicz 2007, 2019; Park et al. -
Development of Hazard Site Surveillance Programs for Forest Invasive Species: a Case Study from Brisbane, Australia
F.R. Wylie, M. Griffiths and J. King 229 Development of hazard site surveillance programs for forest invasive species: a case study from Brisbane, Australia F.R. Wylie1,2, M. Griffiths1 and J. King1 1Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, 80 Meiers Rd, Indooroopilly, Queensland 4068, Australia 2 Email: [email protected] Revised manuscript received 10 April 2008 Summary pests, mainly in forest plantations. A national Asian gypsy moth trapping program is funded by the Australian government and Hazard site surveillance is a system for post-border detection of serviced by state agencies. Australia also uses passive surveillance new pest incursions, targeting sites that are considered potentially in the early detection of exotic plant pests and diseases, enlisting at high risk of such introductions. Globalisation, increased the help of industry and the public through a variety of awareness volumes of containerised freight and competition for space at programs. domestic ports means that goods are increasingly being first opened at premises some distance from the port of entry, thus One of the consequences of the greater volumes of containerised dispersing risk away from the main inspection point. Hazard site freight and resulting competition for space at domestic ports is that surveillance acts as a backstop to border control to ensure that new goods more often are being first opened (devanned) at Quarantine incursions are detected sufficiently early to allow the full range Approved Premises (QAPs) some distance from the port of entry. of management options, including eradication and containment, Some containerised goods that receive clearance on the basis of to be considered. -
The New Crop Industries Handbook—Native Foods
The New Crop Industries Handbook Native foods Native Foods Book.indb 1 18/02/2008 2:05:26 PM © 2008 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra. All rights reserved. This handbook can be reproduced in whole or in part for studying or training purposes subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source and no commercial usage or sale. ISBN 1 74151 610 2 ISSN 1321 2656 Pub. No. 08/021 Project No. HAS-11A The New Crop Industries Handbook—Native Foods RIRDC shall not be responsible in any manner whatsoever to any person who relies, in whole or in part, on the contents of this handbook unless authorised in writing by the Managing Director of RIRDC. The handbook contains certain references to use of particular pesticides. No representation or warranty, express or implied, is made in relation to whether a particular brand of pesticide is preferable over another or whether a particular chemical product is registered by the National Registration Authority. In submitting these reports the researchers have agreed to RIRDC publishing them in edited form. RIRDC contact details Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation Level 2 15 National Circuit BARTON ACT 2600 PO Box 4776 KINGSTON ACT 2604 Tel: 02 6271 4100 Fax: 02 6271 4199 Email: [email protected] Web: www.rirdc.gov.au On-line bookshop: www.rirdc.gov.au/eshop This extract of The New Crop Industries Handbook (RIRDC Pub. No. 04/125) was printed in February 2008 Design, layout and typesetting by the RIRDC Publications Unit Printed by Union Offset Printing, Canberra Native Foods Book.indb 2 18/02/2008 2:05:26 PM Native foods Overview 1 Bush tomato 9 Lemon myrtle 16 Native citrus 21 Native pepper 31 Quandong 36 The Davidson plum 40 iii Native Foods Book.indb 3 18/02/2008 2:05:26 PM Foreword Farmers today, both those in existing businesses and new entrants, live in an environment where they by necessity have to keep an eye on new opportunities. -
Integrated Pest and Disease Management Manual for Persimmon
Department of Agriculture and Fisheries INTEGRATED PEST AND DISEASE MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR PERSIMMON Alan George, Bob Nissen, Grant Bignell, Don Hutton, Roger Broadley and David Bruun Second Edition – November 2017 Authors Alan George, Director, Asia Pacific Agricultural Consultants Pty Ltd Bob Nissen, Director, Ag-Hort International Pty Ltd Grant Bignell, Research Scientist, Department of Agriculutre and Fishereis Don Hutton Roger Broadley David Bruun, Field Operations Manager, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries We would also like to acknowledge the valuable contributions by Kent Andrews, Nic Hobbs, Geoff Patterson, Rod Dalton, Stephen Jeffers, Jeanette Wilson and many other persimmon growers. Hort Innovation and Department of Agriculture and Fisheries make no representations and expressly disclaim all warranties (to the extent permitted by law) about the accuracy, completeness, or currency of information in this Final Report. Users of this Final Report should take independent action to confirm any information in this Final Report before relying on that information in any way. Reliance on any information provided by Hort Innovation is entirely at your own risk. HIA Ltd is not responsible for, and will not be liable for, any loss, damage, claim, expense, cost (including legal costs) or other liability arising in any way (including from HIA Ltd or any other person’s negligence or otherwise) from your use or non‐use of the Final Report or from reliance on information contained in the Final Report or that HIA Ltd provides to you by any other means. This project has been funded by Horticulture Innovation Australia Limited using the Australian Persimmon industry levy and funds from the Australian Government.