Selling Justice Short RIGHTS Why Accountability Matters for Peace WATCH

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Selling Justice Short RIGHTS Why Accountability Matters for Peace WATCH HUMAN Selling Justice Short RIGHTS Why Accountability Matters for Peace WATCH Selling Justice Short Why Accountability Matters for Peace Copyright © 2009 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-508-3 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 hrwnyc@hrw.org Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 berlin@hrw.org Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 hrwbe@hrw.org 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 hrwgva@hrw.org 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 hrwuk@hrw.org 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 paris@hrw.org 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 hrwdc@hrw.org Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org July 2009 1-56432-508-3 Selling Justice Short Why Accountability Matters for Peace I. Overview ......................................................................................................................... 1 II. State of the Law ............................................................................................................10 A. The obligation in international law to prosecute serious international crimes ............ 10 B. No amnesty for the most serious crimes .................................................................... 14 Part One: In the Heat of the Moment: Justice Issues during Peace Talks III. Marginalization ........................................................................................................... 18 A. Charles Taylor ........................................................................................................... 20 B. Radovan Karadzic ...................................................................................................... 25 C. Lord’s Resistance Army ............................................................................................. 28 IV. The Price of Inclusion .................................................................................................. 35 A. Afghanistan ............................................................................................................... 35 B. Democratic Republic of Congo .................................................................................. 43 1. Incorporating abusers in the transitional government .......................................... 45 2. New armed groups want official appointments ................................................... 46 3. Repeat offenders, contrasting fortunes – Laurent Nkunda and Bosco Ntaganda . 50 C. Bosnia and Herzegovina ............................................................................................ 54 V. Explicit and Implicit Amnesties in Peace Agreements .................................................... 57 A. Sierra Leone .............................................................................................................. 57 B. Angola ....................................................................................................................... 61 1. The Bicesse Accords ........................................................................................... 62 2. The next war and the Lusaka Protocol ................................................................. 64 3. The final phase of conflict ................................................................................... 66 C. Sudan ....................................................................................................................... 68 1. North-south conflict ............................................................................................ 68 2. Darfur ................................................................................................................. 70 3. Naivasha peace talks ........................................................................................... 72 4. Ongoing impunity ................................................................................................ 73 Part Two: Long-Term Impact VI. Renewed Cycles of Violence ......................................................................................... 75 A. Kenya ........................................................................................................................ 77 B. Rwanda .................................................................................................................... 82 C. Burundi .................................................................................................................... 86 VII. Strengthening the Rule of Law: Enhanced Domestic Criminal Enforcement .................. 93 A. Ad hoc tribunals ....................................................................................................... 93 1. Bosnia and Herzegovina ..................................................................................... 94 2. Serbia ................................................................................................................. 96 3. Croatia ................................................................................................................ 98 4. Rwanda .............................................................................................................. 99 B. International Criminal Court ..................................................................................... 100 1. Uganda .............................................................................................................. 101 2. Democratic Republic of Congo ........................................................................... 101 3. Sudan ................................................................................................................ 102 4. Central African Republic .................................................................................... 104 5. Situations under analysis: Kenya and Colombia ................................................. 105 C. Universal Jurisdiction ............................................................................................... 108 1. Chile .................................................................................................................. 109 2. Argentina ........................................................................................................... 112 VIII. Protection against Revisionism ................................................................................ 117 A. International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia ......................................... 117 1. Milosevic trial .................................................................................................... 118 2. Srebrenica ......................................................................................................... 120 IX. Deterrence ................................................................................................................. 123 A. Afghanistan ............................................................................................................. 123 B. Côte d’Ivoire ............................................................................................................ 124 C. Democratic Republic of Congo ................................................................................. 125 D. Central African Republic .......................................................................................... 126 Acknowledgments .......................................................................................................... 128 I. Overview The long-running debate about whether seeking justice for grave international crimes interferes with prospects for peace has intensified as the possibility of national leaders being brought to trial for human rights violations becomes more likely. The International Criminal Court (ICC) at The Hague, which is mandated to investigate and prosecute war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide, has already issued its first arrest warrant for a sitting head of state—Sudan’s president Omar al-Bashir. That the ICC operates while armed conflicts are ongoing fuels the justice and peace debate. The temptation to suspend justice in exchange for promises to end a conflict has already arisen with respect to the ICC’s work in Darfur and Uganda, and threatens to recur in coming years as parties and mediators struggle to negotiate peace deals. With the functioning of international criminal courts, national tribunals, and, increasingly, trials abroad, the context of amnesty discussions is already very different from several years ago. It is now generally recognized that international law obligates countries to prosecute genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. International tribunals and national courts applying universal jurisdiction are likely to reject de jure amnesties for the most serious human rights abuses. The trials of Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic and Liberia’s Charles Taylor demonstrate that insulation from prosecution is no longer a certainty for former heads of state. The expectations of victims for justice have changed in this evolving context.1 At the same time, some diplomats tasked with negotiating
Recommended publications
  • 1 Sierra Leone
    Sierra Leone – Researched and compiled by the Refugee Documentation Centre of Ireland on 18 March 2010 Information as to what recent wars Sierra Leone has been involved in and when they ended. In a section titled “History” the United Kingdom Foreign & Commonwealth Office country profile for Sierra Leone states: “The SLPP ruled until 1967 when the electoral victory of the opposition APC was cut short by the country's first military coup. But the military eventually handed over to the APC and its leader Siaka Stevens in 1968. He turned the country into a one -party state in 1978. He finally retired in 1985, handing over to his deputy, General Momoh. Under popular pressure, one party rule was ended in 1991, and a new constitution providing for a return to multi-party politics was approved in August of that year. Elections were scheduled for 1992. But, by this stage, Sierra Leone's institutions had collapsed, mismanagement and corruption had ruined the economy and rising youth unemployment was a serious problem. Taking advantage of the collapse, a rebel movement, the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) emerged, with backing from a warlord, Charles Taylor, in neighbouring Liberia, and in 1991 led a rebellion against the APC government. The government was unable to cope with the insurrection, and was overthrown in a junior Officers coup in April 1992. Its leader, Capt Strasser, was however unable to defeat the RUF. Indeed, the military were more often than not complicit with the rebels in violence and looting.” (United Kingdom Foreign & Commonwealth Office (25 February 2009) Country Profiles: Sub-Saharan Africa – Sierra Leone) This profile summarises the events of the period 1996 to 2002 as follows: “Strasser was deposed in January 1996 by his fellow junta leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Profile of Internal Displacement : Sierra Leone
    PROFILE OF INTERNAL DISPLACEMENT : SIERRA LEONE Compilation of the information available in the Global IDP Database of the Norwegian Refugee Council (as of 15 October, 2003) Also available at http://www.idpproject.org Users of this document are welcome to credit the Global IDP Database for the collection of information. The opinions expressed here are those of the sources and are not necessarily shared by the Global IDP Project or NRC Norwegian Refugee Council/Global IDP Project Chemin Moïse Duboule, 59 1209 Geneva - Switzerland Tel: + 41 22 799 07 00 Fax: + 41 22 799 07 01 E-mail : idpsurvey@nrc.ch CONTENTS CONTENTS 1 PROFILE SUMMARY 6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 CAUSES AND BACKGROUND OF DISPLACEMENT 9 BACKGROUND TO THE CONFLICT 9 CHRONOLOGY OF SIGNIFICANT EVENTS SINCE INDEPENDENCE (1961 - 2000) 9 HISTORICAL OUTLINE OF THE FIRST EIGHT YEARS OF CONFLICT (1991-1998) 13 CONTINUED CONFLICT DESPITE THE SIGNING OF THE LOME PEACE AGREEMENT (JULY 1999-MAY 2000) 16 PEACE PROCESS DERAILED AS SECURITY SITUATION WORSENED DRAMATICALLY IN MAY 2000 18 RELATIVELY STABLE SECURITY SITUATION SINCE SIGNING OF CEASE-FIRE AGREEMENT IN ABUJA ON 10 NOVEMBER 2000 20 CIVIL WAR DECLARED OVER FOLLOWING THE FULL DEPLOYMENT OF UNAMSIL AND THE COMPLETION OF DISARMAMENT (JANUARY 2002) 22 REGIONAL EFFORTS TO MAINTAIN PEACE IN SIERRA LEONE (2002) 23 SIERRA LEONEANS GO TO THE POLLS TO RE-ELECT AHMAD TEJAN KABBAH AS PRESIDENT (MAY 2002) 24 SIERRA LEONE’S SPECIAL COURT AND TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION START WORK (2002-2003) 25 MAIN CAUSES OF DISPLACEMENT 28 COUNTRYWIDE DISPLACEMENT
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Leone
    Coor din ates: 8°3 0′N 1 1 °3 0′W Sierra Leone Sierra Leone (/siˌɛrə liˈoʊn, -ˈoʊni/, UK also /siˌɛərə-, [6] Republic of Sierra Leone ˌsɪərə-/), officially the Republic of Sierra Leone, is a country in West Africa. It is bordered by Guinea to the northeast, Liberia to the southeast and the Atlantic Ocean to the southwest. It has a tropical climate, with a diverse environment ranging from savanna to 2 rainforests. The country has a total area of 7 1,7 40 km Flag Coat of arms (27 ,699 sq mi)[7] and a population of 7 ,07 5,641 as of Motto: "Unity, Freedom, Justice" the 2015 census.[2] Sierra Leone is a constitutional republic with a directly elected president and a Anthem: High We Exalt Thee, Realm of the Free unicameral legislature. Sierra Leone has a dominant unitary central government. The country's capital and largest city is Freetown (population 1,050,301). The second most populous city is Kenema (population 200,354) located 200 miles from Freetown. Sierra Leone is made up of five administrative regions: the Northern Province, North West Province, Eastern Province, Southern Province and the Western Area. These regions are subdivided into sixteen districts, which are further divided into 190 chiefdoms.[8][9] Sierra Leone was a British colony from 1808 to 1961. Sierra Leone became independent from the United Location of Sierra Leone (dark blue) Kingdom on 27 April 1961, led by Sir Milton Margai, – in Africa (light blue & dark grey) – in the African Union (light blue) – [Legend] who became the country's first prime minister.
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Leona Sierra Leona
    OFICINA DE INFORMACIÓN DIPLOMÁTICA FICHA PAÍS Sierra Leona Sierra Leona La Oficina de Información Diplomática del Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores y de Cooperación pone a disposición de los profesionales de los medios de co- municación y del público en general la presente ficha país. La información contenida en esta ficha país es pública y se ha extraído de diversos medios no oficiales. La presente ficha país no defiende posición política alguna ni de este Ministerio ni del Gobierno de España respecto del país sobre el que versa. JUNIO 2020 División administrativa: 3 provincias y un distrito: Provincia del Norte, Pro- Sierra Leona vincia del Sur, Provincia del Este y el Área Occidental. Las Provincias se dividen en 12 distritos, que a su vez se dividen en 149 comunidades (chie- fdoms). La Provincia del Este está dividida en tres distritos: Kailahun, Ke- nema y Kono; la Provincia del Norte (la más extensa del país) se divide en 5 distritos: Bombali, Kambia, Koinadugu, Port Loko y Tonkolili.; y la Provincia del Sur en cuatro: Bo, Bonthe, Moyamba y Pujehun. En el Área Occidental, GUINEA se encuentra la capital Freetown que se divide en dos sectores: Área rural y Área urbana. Kabala 1.2. Geografía Kambia Gran parte de sus 402 kilómetros de costa está formada por manglares panta- Makeni nosos, a excepción de la península donde se sitúa Freetown. El resto del suelo de Sierra Leona se compone por una gran meseta, a 300 metros sobre el nivel Lungi Koidu del mar, principalmente poblada por bosques. En contraste a esta geografía poco FREETOWN abrupta, el Norte del país está poblado por diversos montes, cuyo pico más alto es el Loma Mansa, que se estira hasta los 1948 metros.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 November, 97 Ref
    ECONOMIC COMMUNITY OF WEST AFRICAN STATES COMMUNAUTE ECONOMIQUE DBS ETATS DE L'AFRIQUE DE L'OUEST ECOWAS CEDEAO HEADQUARTERS: SIEGE: 6, KING GEORGE V ROAD, 6, KING GEORGE V ROAD, P. M. B. 1 2745, LACOS (NIGERIA) P. M. B. 12745, LAGOS (NIGERIA) TELEPHONE: 2600720-9, 2600860-8, TELEPHONE: 2600720-9, 2600860-8, TELEX: 22633, 28213, 23749 ECOWAS NC. TELEX: 22633, 28213, 23749 ECOWAS NG. FAX: 26370S2, 2637675, 2600869. FAX:2637052, 2637675, 2600869. SECRETARIAT. SECRETARIAT. ECW/REL/020/LEG/139 5 November, 97 Ref. No., :.-•. 19 The Secretary-General United Nations 1 UN Plaza New York 10017 New York Dear Sir, of the ECOWAS Committee of Five Sierra Leone— -? to the United Nations Security Council I have the honour to transmit the first report of the ECOWAS Committee of Five on Sierra Leone, covering the period from 8 October to 5 November, 1997 as requested by the Security Council in paragraph 9 of Resolution 1132(1997) concerning the situation in Sierra Leone for onward transmission to the Chairman of the United Nations Security Council. ......................... ....... ------ ............ ----------- Please accept, Your Excellency, the renewed assurances of my highest consideration. Lansana Executive Secre/tary ECONOMIC COMMUNITY OF WEST AFRICAN STATES FIRST REPORT OF THE ECOWAS COMMITTEE OF FIVE ON SIERRA LEONE TO THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL MADE PURSUANT TO UNITED NATIONS RESOLUTION S/RES 1132(1997) OF 8/10/97 EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT LAGOS, INTRODUCTION 1. On 25 May, 1997. a section of the military in Sierra Leone violently overthrew the legitimate government of President Ahmad Tejan Kabbah. 2. The coup d'etat was not only notably bloody but it also resulted in very tragic consequences on all class of citizens of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeking Stability at Sustainable Cost: Principles for a New U.S
    Seeking Stability at Sustainable Cost: Principles for a New U.S. Strategy in the Middle East Report of the Task Force on Managing Disorder in the Middle East April 2017 Aaron Lobel Task Force Co-Chairs Founder and President, America Abroad Media Ambassador Eric Edelman Former U.S. Ambassador to Turkey Mary Beth Long Former Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Jake Sullivan Affairs Former Director of Policy Planning, U.S. State Department Former National Security Advisor to the Vice President Alan Makovsky Former Senior Professional Staff Member, House Foreign Affairs Committee Task Force Members Ray Takeyh Ambassador Morton Abramowitz Former Senior Advisor on Iran, U.S. State Department Former U.S. Ambassador to Turkey General Charles Wald (ret., USAF) Henri Barkey Former Deputy Commander, U.S. European Command Director, Middle East Program, Woodrow Wilson International Center Former Commander, U.S. Central Command Air Forces Hal Brands Amberin Zaman Henry A. Kissinger Distinguished Professor of Global Affairs at the Columnist, Al-Monitor; Woodrow Wilson Center Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies Svante Cornell Staff Director, Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and Silk Road Studies Program Blaise Misztal Director of National Security Ambassador Ryan Crocker Former U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and Lebanon Nicholas Danforth Senior Policy Analyst Ambassador Robert Ford Former Ambassador to Syria Jessica Michek Policy Analyst John Hannah Former Assistant for National Security Affairs to the Vice President Ambassador James Jeffrey Former Ambassador to Turkey and Iraq DISCLAIMER The findings and recommendations expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of the Bipartisan Policy Center’s founders or its board of directors.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Chronology: 1991-1997
    QUESTION AND ANSWER SERIES SIERRA LEONE POLITICAL, MILITARY, AND HUMAN RIGHTS CHRONOLOGY: 1991-1997 [QA/SLE/98.001] APRIL 1998 PRODUCED BY: INS RESOURCE INFORMATION CENTER 425 I STREET, N.W. (ULLICO BUILDING, 3RD FLOOR) WASHINGTON, D.C. 20536 DISCLAIMER The July 27, 1990 Regulations, “Aliens and Nationality: Asylum and Withholding of Deportation Procedures,” mandated the creation of a new corps of Asylum Officers to provide an initial, nonadversarial adjudication of asylum claims. Asylum Officers use asylum law, interviews with asylum applicants, and relevant information on country conditions to determine the merits of individual claims for asylum. As specified in the Regulations (8 CFR 208.12), as amended, such information may be obtained from “the Department of State, the Office of International Affairs, other Service offices, or other credible sources, such as international organizations, private voluntary agencies, news organizations, or academic institutions.” Question and Answer Series papers are one means by which information on human rights conditions in a country and/or conditions affecting given groups or individuals deemed “at risk” within a given country is presented to Asylum and Immigration Officers. Question and Answer Series papers are brief descriptions of conditions in countries based on information provided by the sources referred to above. They are prepared by expert consultants and/or the staff of the Resource Information Center, Immigration and Naturalization Service, U.S. Department of Justice. Question and Answer papers cannot be, and do not purport to be either exhaustive with regard to the country surveyed, or conclusive as to the merits of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kosovo Report
    THE KOSOVO REPORT CONFLICT v INTERNATIONAL RESPONSE v LESSONS LEARNED v THE INDEPENDENT INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON KOSOVO 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Great Clarendon Street, Oxford ox2 6dp Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford Executive Summary • 1 It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, Address by former President Nelson Mandela • 14 and education by publishing worldwide in Oxford New York Map of Kosovo • 18 Athens Auckland Bangkok Bogotá Buenos Aires Calcutta Introduction • 19 Cape Town Chennai Dar es Salaam Delhi Florence Hong Kong Istanbul Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Mumbai Nairobi Paris São Paulo Singapore Taipei Tokyo Toronto Warsaw PART I: WHAT HAPPENED? with associated companies in Berlin Ibadan Preface • 29 Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the uk and in certain other countries 1. The Origins of the Kosovo Crisis • 33 Published in the United States 2. Internal Armed Conflict: February 1998–March 1999 •67 by Oxford University Press Inc., New York 3. International War Supervenes: March 1999–June 1999 • 85 © Oxford University Press 2000 4. Kosovo under United Nations Rule • 99 The moral rights of the author have been asserted Database right Oxford University Press (maker) PART II: ANALYSIS First published 2000 5. The Diplomatic Dimension • 131 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, 6. International Law and Humanitarian Intervention • 163 without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, 7. Humanitarian Organizations and the Role of Media • 201 or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics rights organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside... Exchanging Ideas on Europe the Cinema of the EU
    Exchanging Ideas on Europe NEWS UACES Issue 72 Summer 2012 UACES COLLABORATIVE RESEARCH NETWORKS Read about the latest UACES CRN events. PAGES 6-7 UACES ELECTION RESULTS Meet the new UACES committee members. PAGE 12 REPORTING EUROPE PRIZE Find out who was awarded this year’s prize at the award ceremony in London. PAGE 14 European Crisis, European Solidarity Tim Haughton reports on the 2012 JCMS Annual Review lecture by Erik Jones (pictured). PAGE 5 ASK ARCHIMEDES Can Europe maximise its potential by The Cinema of the EU: European Identity harnessing the value of its knowledge and Universality economy? PAGE 15 Brussels, 10 May 2012 Mariana Liz, King’s College London Aiming to offer an institutional perspective on contemporary European cinema, this presentation, part of the UACES Arena Seminar series, was centred on the EU’s major initiative in support of the audiovisual sector, the MEDIA Programme. The event provided a timely discussion on European fi lm and identity as ‘Creative Europe’, a new programme for the cultural sector, is being fi nalised and identifi cation with the European integration project weakens in the face of an economic and political crisis. UACES Annual Running since 1991, MEDIA supports a series of initiatives in the pre- and post- General Meeting production of fi lms, with the largest share of its budget (currently at €755 million) being allocated to distribution. Although the impact of MEDIA was briefl y addressed, the 17:00 - 17:45 seminar’s main focus was on the programme’s communication. After an overview of the Sunday 2nd September history of European identity in the EU – from the Declaration signed in 1973 to the failed constitution and the signing of the Lisbon Treaty in 2007 – the presentation analysed fi ve Passau, Germany clips produced by the European Commission to promote MEDIA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Media and UN "Peacekeeping"Since the Gulf War
    Vol. XVII No. 1, Spring 1997 The Media and UN "Peacekeeping"Since the Gulf War by Stephen Badsey Stephen Badsey is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of War Studies at the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst, and a Senior Research Fellow of the Institute for the Study of War and Society at DeMontfort University. INTRODUCTION 1 The changes in United Nations (UN) "peacekeeping" operations within the last five years have been both dramatic and multifaceted. This article attempts to show that the media (particularly those of the United States, which are dominant within, and may under most circumstances be taken as virtually identical to, the international media) have in all their aspects become, and remain, critical elements in determining the success or failure of these operations. It points to three principal areas of current practice regarding the media which have contributed to the failure or partial failure of recent UN "peacekeeping" missions. One of these is a failure of understanding of the media exhibited by the government and military forces of the United States, as the result of doctrine established before the end of the Cold War. Another is the failure of the UN or its constituent members to respond effectively to anti-peacekeeper propaganda, especially that promulgated by political authorities in target countries for "peacekeeping," and including their ability to exploit the international media for propaganda purposes. The third is the failure of the UN to develop "peacekeeping" doctrine which takes the value of the media into account. The article calls for advances in international relations theory in this field as an aid to further understanding.
    [Show full text]
  • Selling Justice Short
    Selling Justice Short Why Accountability Matters for Peace Copyright © 2009 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-508-3 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 hrwnyc@hrw.org Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 berlin@hrw.org Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 hrwbe@hrw.org 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 hrwgva@hrw.org 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 hrwuk@hrw.org 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 paris@hrw.org 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 hrwdc@hrw.org Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org July 2009 1-56432-508-3 Selling Justice Short Why Accountability Matters for Peace I. Overview ......................................................................................................................... 1 II. State of the Law ............................................................................................................10 A. The obligation in international law to prosecute serious international crimes ............ 10 B. No amnesty for the most serious crimes .................................................................... 14 Part One: In the Heat of the Moment: Justice Issues during Peace Talks III. Marginalization ........................................................................................................... 18 A.
    [Show full text]
  • American University Library
    NAVIGATING CRISES IN SINO-AMERICAN RELATIONS: APOLOGY, NATIONALISM, AND HISTORICAL MEMORY by Elizabeth S. Dahl submitted to the Faculty of the School of International Service of American University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in International Relatic ~ Dr. PatrickJmaddeus Jackson Louis W. Goodman, Dean 2006 American University Washington, D.C. 20016 AMERICAN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 3222262 Copyright 2006 by Dahl, Elizabeth S. All rights reserved. INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ® UMI UMI Microform 3222262 Copyright 2006 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. © COPYRIGHT by Elizabeth S. Dahl 2006 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. To my parents, Janet and David Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
    [Show full text]