PDF Document

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PDF Document Iran Human Rights Documentation Center The Iran Human Rights Documentation Center (IHRDC) believes that the development of an accountability movement and a culture of human rights in Iran are crucial to the long-term peace and security of the country and the Middle East region. As numerous examples have illustrated, the removal of an authoritarian regime does not necessarily lead to an improved human rights situation if institutions and civil society are weak, or if a culture of human rights and democratic governance has not been cultivated. By providing Iranians with comprehensive human rights reports, data about past and present human rights violations and information about international human rights standards, particularly the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the IHRDC programs will strengthen Iranians’ ability to demand accountability, reform public institutions, and promote transparency and respect for human rights. Encouraging a culture of human rights within Iranian society as a whole will allow political and legal reforms to have real and lasting weight. The IHRDC seeks to: . Establish a comprehensive and objective historical record of the human rights situation in Iran since the 1979 revolution, and on the basis of this record, establish responsibility for patterns of human rights abuses; . Make such record available in an archive that is accessible to the public for research and educational purposes; . Promote accountability, respect for human rights and the rule of law in Iran; and . Encourage an informed dialogue on the human rights situation in Iran among scholars and the general public in Iran and abroad. Iran Human Rights Documentation Center 129 Church Street New Haven, Connecticut 06510, USA Tel: +1-(203)-772-2218 Fax: +1-(203)-772-1782 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.iranhrdc.org Photograph: The front cover photo shows a female protestor during the post-election demonstrations facing approaching security forces. © 2010 All Rights Reserved. Iran Human Rights Documentation Center, New Haven, Connecticut Silencing the Women’s Rights Movement in Iran Iran Human Rights Documentation Center August 2010 Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1. The Women’s Rights Movement in Iran ....................................................... 3 1.1 Before the Islamic Republic .....................................................................................3 1.2 The Islamic Republic ...............................................................................................5 1.2.1 Ahmadinejad’s First Term (2005-2009) ................................................................ 8 2. Targeting of Women’s Rights Activists in Lead-Up to the June 2009 Election ........................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Promises by Presidential Candidates .....................................................................12 2.2 Suppression of Activists ........................................................................................13 3. Targeting of Women’s Rights Activists and Defenders Post-Election ...... 16 3.1 Discrediting the Leadership ..................................................................................19 3.2 Arrests of Other Women’s Rights Activists ..........................................................23 3.3 Arrests of Leaders, Members and Signature Collectors of One Million Signatures Campaign ...............................................................................................................30 3.4 Arrests of Members of the Mourning Mothers ......................................................32 3.5 Interrogations .........................................................................................................33 3.6 Restriction on Freedom of Movement ...................................................................38 4. Violations of International and Iranian Law ..............................................40 4.1 Violation of Fundamental Freedoms of Expression, Assembly and Association ..40 4.2 Denial of Due Process ............................................................................................42 4.3 Mistreatment and Torture in Detention ..................................................................45 4.4 Use of Bail as Punishment .....................................................................................46 4.5 Offi cial Harassment ...............................................................................................48 4.5.1 Right to Privacy .................................................................................................. 48 4.5.2 Right to Work .......................................................................................................49 4.5.3 Freedom of Movement ........................................................................................ 49 Conclusion ............................................................................................................. 50 Methodology .......................................................................................................... 51 Introduction 1 Introduction On the morning of July 17, 2009, Shadi Sadr, the prominent lawyer and women’s rights activist, was walking with friends to Tehran University where they planned to attend the Friday prayer led by Ayatollah Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani. Suddenly, plainclothesmen jumped out of a car and threw her into it. They drove her to the Tracking Offi ce (Daftar-i Paygiri) in the center of Tehran, which houses personnel from Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence. Later that night, they took her to Evin prison, where she was held for twelve days, much of the time in solitary confi nement and in unsanitary conditions. Rotating teams continuously interrogated her about her personal life, other women’s rights activists, her foreign travels, and her opinion about the recent election. Interrogators tried to pressure her into divulging the passwords to her e-mail accounts. Two or three days after her arrest, she was told she was charged with endangering national security through causing riots (iqtishash). Three or four days before her release, interrogators blindfolded her and put her in a room where she could hear the screams and moans of about 15-20 men being beaten. The room shook with the loud noises of weapons, batons, and whips. After 30-45 minutes, they took her, still trembling, to another room for further interrogation. A few days after her release, prosecutors read the indictment at the fi rst mass show trial in Tehran. It named Sadr as a leader of the women’s rights movement that was fomenting an alleged velvet revolution to overthrow the Islamic Republic. Sadr was stunned—these accusations and her charges were very serious and could merit the death penalty in Iran. She fl ed for Turkey forty-eight hours later. The women’s rights movement in Iran can trace its origins to the Constitutional Revolution of 1906 during which women advocated for equal education rights. After the Pahlavis took power in 1925, many of the demands for equality became part of their drive to modernize Iran. By the time Ayatollah Khomeini took power in 1979, veiling was no longer mandatory, and women could vote and run for political offi ce. The Family Protection Law, passed in 1966 and amended in 1975, gave women more rights relating to marriage, divorce and inheritance. Many of these rights were abrogated in the years following the 1979 revolution. While women were encouraged to organize during the presidency of reformist Seyyed Mohammad Khatami from 1997 to 2005, conservative elements of the regime continued to suppress activists. The suppression increased during the fi rst Ahmadinejad administration. Activists were regularly harassed, interrogated, arrested and imprisoned. However, the women’s rights movement not only survived but prospered. In 2006, a group of veteran activists created the One Million Signatures Campaign. The Campaign is a grassroots effort to gather signatures and educate the Iranian public on the inequalities suffered by women. Women’s rights activists were successful in convincing the Parliamentary Judicial Committee to temporarily shelve the controversial parts of a “Family Protection Law” introduced by Ahmadinejad during the summer of 2008. The proposed law made polygamy easier for men, divorce more diffi cult for women, and criminalized the marriage of a non-Iranian man to an Iranian woman without government authorization. The impact of the movement was also refl ected in the fact that, although Iran’s Guardian Council rejected the candidacy of women who sought to run in the June 2009 presidential election (as it had in all prior presidential elections), three of the four candidates permitted to run endorsed many of their calls for equality. Considering the movement as an increasing threat, the Iranian government took calculated steps during the months leading up to the election to silence women’s rights activists. It closed the offi ces of the Defenders of Human Rights Center that had been founded by Nobel Prize Winner Shirin Ebadi; it implemented, for the fi rst time, the prison sentence of a women’s rights activist that had been imposed for her activism; and it arrested, interrogated, and detained activists. It prohibited many from leaving the country. 2 Silencing the Women’s Rights Movement in Iran As reported in
Recommended publications
  • A/HRC/13/39/Add.1 General Assembly
    United Nations A/HRC/13/39/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 February 2010 English/French/Spanish only Human Rights Council Thirteenth session Agenda item 3 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development Report of the Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, Manfred Nowak Addendum Summary of information, including individual cases, transmitted to Governments and replies received* * The present document is being circulated in the languages of submission only as it greatly exceeds the page limitations currently imposed by the relevant General Assembly resolutions. GE.10-11514 A/HRC/13/39/Add.1 Contents Paragraphs Page List of abbreviations......................................................................................................................... 5 I. Introduction............................................................................................................. 1–5 6 II. Summary of allegations transmitted and replies received....................................... 1–305 7 Algeria ............................................................................................................ 1 7 Angola ............................................................................................................ 2 7 Argentina ........................................................................................................ 3 8 Australia.........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    iran ★• by Nayereh Tohidi POPULATION: 73,244,000 GNI PER CAPITA: US$3,998 COUNTRY RATINGS 20041 2009 NONDISCRIMINATION AND ACCESS TO JUSTICE: N/A 1.9 AUTONOMY, SECURITY, AND FREEDOM OF THE PERSON: N/A 2.1 ECONOMIC RIGHTS AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY: N/A 2.7 POLITICAL RIGHTS AND CIVIC VOICE: N/A 2.1 SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS: N/A 2.5 (COUNTRY RATINGS ARE BASED ON A SCALE OF 1 TO 5, WITH 1 REPRESENTING THE LOWEST AND 5 THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF FREEDOM WOMEN HAVE TO EXERCISE THEIR RIGHTS) INTRODUCTION A populist revolution in 1978–79 put an end to Iran’s long-standing tradi- tion of monarchy, replacing it with a unique Islamic republic, wherein reli- gious clerics assumed political control under a supreme leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. Despite massive participation by women in the revo- lution and a subsequent increase in the levels and forms of women’s social presence and educational achievements, the Islamic Republic brought many negative changes to women’s rights and personal freedoms. Sex seg- regation and compulsory veiling, discrimination in penal and civil codes, and setbacks in personal status and family law further institutionalized patriarchal gender relations and cultural attitudes. The discriminatory state ideology and policies of the Islamic Re pub- lic run against the modern socioeconomic and demographic realities in the country, especially with respect to the growing number of urban, educated, middle-class women. Their quest for equal rights and col- lective action to improve their status began during the Constitutional Revolution of 1906–11. Continuous pressure from women’s groups led to government reforms concerning women’s education, employment, suffrage, and family law under the Pahlavi dynasty, which ruled from 1925 until 1979.
    [Show full text]
  • Decentralization and Democracy in Iran
    DECENTRALIZATION AND DEMOCRACY IN IRAN SAEID NOURI NESHAT THESIS SUBMITTED IN FULFILMENTMalaya OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHYof FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND ADMINISTRATION UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA UniversityKUALA LUMPUR 2017 i Abstract It was only twenty years after the 1979 Revolution that local Islamic councils were legalized and launched everywhere in Iran as part of reforms to strengthen decentralization and enhance people’s participation in policy planning. However, although these councils comprise elected members, they have not been fully institutionalized within the local government system and within Iran’s hierarchy of power. Local councils, therefore, have not led to the greater empowerment of people. This study assesses the decentralization process within the power structure after the Iranian Revolution. The research aims to provide insights into these key questions: how was the structure of the post-revolution decentralization system different from that of the previous regime? Why has the policy of decentralizationMalaya not led to the sort of devolution that would enable people to participateof in decision-making? What are the political obstacles to the empowerment of the people, a professed goal of the post- revolution government? A qualitative research method involving a multiple case study approach is used here. Urban and rural communities were selected for assessment through purposive sampling. Easton’s theory of political system was applied as it provides an effective conceptual framework to examine and explain the data. TheUniversity results indicate that the post-revolution system is one that can be classified as a filtered democracy. In this type of political system, inputs from society have to pass through filters created by power elites.
    [Show full text]
  • Women's Rights in the Middle East and North Africa
    HARD-WON PROGRESS AND A LONG ROAD AHEAD: WOMEN’S RIGHTS IN THE MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA by Sanja Kelly As the governments of the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) under- take the diffi cult process of enacting social and political change, the unequal status of women presents a particularly formidable challenge. In Iraq, deliberations over women’s legal status have been as contentious as negotiations over how to structure the government. In Jordan, measures to increase penalties for so-called honor crimes faced strong resistance by ultraconservative parliamentarians and ordinary citizens who believe that tradition and religion afford them the right to severely punish and even murder female relatives for behavior they deem immoral. These debates are not just legal and philosophical struggles among elites. They are emo- tionally charged political battles that touch upon fundamental notions of morality and social order. In order to provide a detailed look at the conditions faced by women in the Middle East and understand the complex environment surrounding efforts to improve their status, Freedom House conducted a comprehen- sive study of women’s rights in the region. The fi rst edition of this project was published in 2005. The present edition offers an updated examination of the issue, with a special focus on changes that have occurred over the last fi ve years. Although the study indicates that a substantial defi cit in women’s rights persists in every country in the MENA region, the fi ndings also include notable progress, particularly in terms of economic opportu- nities, educational attainment, and political participation.
    [Show full text]
  • Upgrading the Women's Movement in Iran
    Upgrading the Women’s Movement in Iran: Through Cultural Activism, Creative Resistance, and Adaptability Meaghan Smead Samuels A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in International Studies University of Washington 2018 Committee: Kathie Friedman Sara Curran Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies ©Copyright 2018 Meaghan Smead Samuels 2 University of Washington Abstract Upgrading the Women’s Movement in Iran: Through Cultural Activism, Creative Resistance, and Adaptability Meaghan Smead Samuels Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Kathie Friedman Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies The purpose of this research is to identify and analyze the effects of the 2009 post- election state crackdown on the Iranian Women’s Movement. Varying narratives of how the crackdown affected women’s activism necessitate a better understanding as to how this social movement negotiates periods of repression. An examination of accounts and actions by women in Iran reveal this Movement to be fluid, adaptable, and resilient, utilizing different structures, strategies and tactics depending on the current political environment. This study demonstrates the ability of Iranian women to develop creative solutions for public engagement in repressive moments, including through everyday acts of resistance and by practicing cultural activism. Women in Iran work to transform culture in order to impel the state to make changes to discriminatory laws. Prevailing social movement theories help to explain some characteristics of the Iranian Women’s Movement, but a more complex model is required to account for dynamic gendered social movements in non-Western, authoritarian contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly A/HRC/13/22/Add.1 24 February 2010
    UNITED NATIONS A Distr. GENERAL General Assembly A/HRC/13/22/Add.1 24 February 2010 ENGLISH/FRENCH/SPANISH ONLY HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL Thirteenth session Agenda item 3 PROMOTION AND PROTECTION OF ALL HUMAN RIGHTS, CIVIL, POLITICAL, ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO DEVELOPMENT Report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders, Margaret Sekaggya Addendum Summary of cases transmitted to Governments and replies received∗ ∗ The present document is being circulated in the languages of submission only, as it greatly exceeds the word limitations currently imposed by the relevant General Assembly resolutions. GE.10-11297 A/HRC/13/22/Add.1 Page 2 Contents Introduction................................................................................................................................5 Algeria .......................................................................................................................................5 Argentina ...................................................................................................................................8 Azerbaijan................................................................................................................................16 Bahrain.....................................................................................................................................18 Belarus .....................................................................................................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • Macron Confounding France
    WWW.TEHRANTIMES.COM I N T E R N A T I O N A L D A I L Y 16 Pages Price 20,000 Rials 1.00 EURO 4.00 AED 39th year No.13271 Thursday DECEMBER 6, 2018 Azar 15, 1397 Rabi’ Al awwal 28, 1440 Prayer can lift up 2231 resolution Iranian trio Blind artist to hold society’s virtue doesn’t limit missile appointed for workshop to erase doubts 2 program 2 2019 AFC Asian Cup 15 over her ability to paint 16 Anti-Iran consensus Macron confounding France fails at UN POLITICS TEHRAN – Attempts France seized the moment to wring deskto bring the United Na- an agreement against Iran’s missile As France faces worst riots, Paris sends rockets to terrorists tions Security Council into a consensus tests out of the session. against Iran’s missile tests failed to achieve The two European countries’ attempt to do chemical attacks in Syria the desired conclusion sought by the U.S., followed U.S. claim that Iran’s missile test France and Britain. was a violation of UN Security Council On Tuesday, the UN Security Resolution 2231 which endorsed the nu- See page 13 Council held a closed session whose clear agreement, officially known as the primary focus was the use of chem- JCPOA (the Joint Comprehensive Plan ical weapons in Syria. Britain and of Action). 2 Iran to carry out cloud seeding project by drones in weeks SOCIETY TEHRAN — A cloud Cloud seeding, a form of weather deskseeding project will modification, is a method to change the be carried out within the next few weeks amount or even type of precipitation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Binding Sisterhood of Transnational Feminism: a Close Look at Iran and Argentina
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 12-15-2019 A Binding Sisterhood of Transnational Feminism: A Close Look at Iran and Argentina Bernadette Mary Lazar Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the International Relations Commons Repository Citation Lazar, Bernadette Mary, "A Binding Sisterhood of Transnational Feminism: A Close Look at Iran and Argentina" (2019). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 3818. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/18608701 This Dissertation is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Dissertation in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Dissertation has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A BINDING SISTERHOOD OF TRANSNATIONAL FEMINISM: A CLOSE LOOK AT IRAN AND ARGENTINA By Bernadette M. Lazar Bachelor of Arts – Political Science University of Nevada, Las Vegas 2010 Master of Arts – Political Science University of Nevada, Las Vegas 2015 A dissertation
    [Show full text]
  • From Protest to Prison: Iran One Year After the Election 5
    from protest to pri son IrAn onE yEAr AftEr tHE ELECtIon amnesty international is a global movement of 2.8 million supporters, members and activists in more than 150 countries and territories who campaign to end grave abuses of human rights. our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of human rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. amnesty international publications first published in 2010 by amnesty international publications international secretariat peter Benenson house 1 easton street london Wc1X 0DW United Kingdom www.amnesty.org © amnesty international publications 2010 index: mDe 13/062/2010 original language: english printed by amnesty international, international secretariat, United Kingdom all rights reserved. this publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. the copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. for copying in any other circumstances, or for re-use in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. Cover phot o: Demonstration in tehran following the disputed 12 June 2009 presidential election. © Javad montazeri Back cover phot o: a mass “show trial” in tehran’s revolutionary court, 25 august 2009; defendants are dressed in grey. © ap/pa photo/fars news agency, hasan Ghaedi CONTENTS 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................5 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanrightsabuseiniran 2010.Pdf
    January 2010 2 January 2010 3 January 2010 4 January 2010 Copyright©2010 by Human Rights Center of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. A publication of the Human Rights Center of the National Council of Resistance of Iran Correspondance address: B.P. 18, 95430 Auvers-sur-Oise, France. Email: [email protected] 5 January 2010 6 January 2010 Introduction This year’s events brought about unprecedented instability for the mullahs’ regime in Iran. The Iranian people’s rejection of the regime in its entirety while demanding a de mocratic government, the clerical regime’s total isolation while losing its friends in the West in its duel with the international community to acquire the nuclear bomb as well as the major blows it received strategically in export of terrorism to neighboring countries and the region as a whole, joined hands to create a deep division within the Iranian regime. To survive, the mullahs stepped up suppression and committed systematic violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms, further deteriorating the already appalling situation in Iran. These attempts went even beyond Iran’s boundaries, moving into the neighboring Iraq to crack down on opponents protected by the Fourth Geneva Convention. The sham presidential elections in Iran on the one hand revealed the weakness of the religious-military regime and on the other, the Iranian people’s peaceful demand for change.
    [Show full text]
  • One Million Signatures Campaign for Equality the Inside Story Noushin Ahmadi Khorasani
    Iranian Women’s One Million Signatures Campaign for Equality The Inside Story Noushin Ahmadi Khorasani Women's Learning Partnership Translation Series Iranian Women’s One Million Signatures Campaign for Equality The Inside Story Noushin Ahmadi Khorasani Foreword by Mahnaz Afkhami Women's Learning Partnership Translation Series Copyright © 2009 by Women’s Learning Partnership (WLP) ISBN Number: 978-0-9814652-0-3 Design: Xanthusdesign.com OTHER PUBLICATIONS BY NOUSHIN AHMADI KHORASANI Women Without a Past, 1998 Women’s Historical Calendar, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2007, 2008 Senator: Biography of Senator Mehrangiz Manouchehrian, co-authored with Parvin Ardalan, 2003 Under the Shadow of the Godfathers, 2003 Diaries: Sixteen Iranian Women Reflect on Their Daily Lives, 2008 CONTENTS FOREWORD .....................................................................1 PREFACE ..........................................................................5 CHAPTER ONE Why the One Million Signatures Campaign? .........................11 The Perils of Polygamy ..........................................................16 Women and Men Under Polygamy ........................................19 Answering the Critics ............................................................30 CHAPTER TWO The One Million Signatures Movement: Toward a New Era in Iran .....................................................35 Without a Place: The Female Experience in Iran ...................40 Democracy from the Bottom Up ............................................42 Face-to-Face
    [Show full text]
  • Iranian Women's Equality Calendar
    Iranian Women’s Equality Calendar with Chronology of One Million Signatures Campaign Demanding Changes to Discriminatory Laws By: Noushin Ahmadi Khorasani Translated into English: Sahar Mofakham, Mahsa Shekarloo & Leila Tavakoli Email: [email protected] www.feministschool.net/english Published in Iran – Tehran P.O.Box : 14335-851 Copyright ©2008, All rights reserved Introduction The Iranian Women's Calendar provides a glimpse into the hidden history of Iranian women, a history that has not only remained unfamiliar throughout the world, but one that has yet to receive its due attention in Iran. It also shows a brief chronology of one Million Signatures campaign that is one of the most important movements in Iran. Women's world encyclopaedias and anthologies are void of Iranian women, despite the significant role they have played in women's advancement in the Middle East since Iran's 1905 constitutional revolution. The women's movement in Iran has made visible waves in the region and has shared an interactive relationship with other women's movements throughout the world; it has affected and been affected by women's movements in both Western and non-Western countries. During the past 100 years, Iranian women have overcome many obstacles imposed on them by various governments and restrictive traditions. The women honoured in these pages have challenged their prescribed subservient positions, and have penetrated a wide array of fields previously prohibited to them. It has not yet been a hundred years since the establishment of the first all-girls school in Iran- those women who participated in founding such schools and contributed to women's education are honoured in this calendar.
    [Show full text]