Supplemental Figures

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Supplemental Figures 1 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS: 2 3 Supplemental figures 4 1 Control lung IPF lung (perivascular space) (fbroblast foci) PRRX1 PRRX1 PRRX1 PRRX1 aB VIM b ACTA2 d VIM e ACTA2 PRRX1 PRRX1 c CD45 f CD45 Supplemental Figure 1 5 Supplemental Figure S1: Co-expression of PRRX1 with Vimentin and ACTA2 in control 6 and IPF lungs by immunochemistry. 7 (a-c) Representative immunohistochemistry images (n=3 per group) in control lung showing 8 PRRX1 staining (Brown Chromogen, nuclear staining) in perivascular space with (a) Vimentin 9 (Red chromogen), (b) ACTA2 (Red chromogen) and (c) CD45 (Red chromogen). Note that 10 PRRX1 positive cells (arrow) were Vimentine positive (a) but ACTA2 (b) and CD45 negative 11 (c). Insert in (a): high magnification of the black dashed box in the main left panel showing a 12 double positive PRRX1 (brown nuclear staining, outlined with dashed white line) and Vimentin 13 (red cytoplasmic staining) cell. Insert in (c): high magnification of the black dashed box in the 14 main bottom panel showing a PRRX1 (brown nuclear staining) positive but CD45 negative cell 15 (arrow) as well as a CD45 (red cytoplasmic staining) positive but PRRX1 negative cell 16 (arrowhead). (d-f) Representative immunohistochemistry images (n=3 per group) showing 17 PRRX1 staining (Brown Chromogen, nuclear staining) in IPF fibroblast foci with (d) Vimentin 18 (Red chromogen), (e) ACTA2 (Red chromogen) and (f) CD45 (Red chromogen). Note that 19 PRRX1 positive cells were Vimentin positive (see black arrow in (d)) but only some were 20 ACTA2 positive (arrow and dashed box in (e)). PRRX1pos ACTA2neg cells were also present 21 (see arrowhead in (e)). All PRRX1pos cell populations were also CD45 negative (f). Insert in 22 (d): high magnification of the black dashed box in the main left panel showing a double positive 23 PRRX1 (brown nuclear staining, see black arrow) and Vimentin (red cytoplasmic staining) 24 cells. Note that the epithelium is negative for both markers. Panel in (e): high magnification of 25 the black dashed box in the main right panel showing a double positive PRRX1 (brown nuclear 26 staining, see black arrow) and ACTA2 (red cytoplasmic staining) cell. PRRX1pos ACTA2neg cells 27 were also present (see arrowhead). Right panel in (f): high magnification of the black dashed 28 box in the main left bottom panel showing a PRRX1 (brown nuclear staining) positive but CD45 29 negative cell (arrow) and a CD45pos (red cytoplasmic staining) positive but PRRX1neg cell 30 (arrowhead). Nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin in all panels. Abbreviations: Vim 31 (Vimentin), Pos (positive), neg (negative). (Scale bar: 50µm in (a-b), 80μm in (c) and 25µm in 32 high magnification (a and c); 80µm in (d-f) and 40µm in high magnification (d-f)). 33 2 Supplemental Figure 2 PRRX1 mRNA expression UMAP2 a Aberrant Basaloid AT1 AT2 Bcell Plasmacytoid B Cell Basal Eptih. Cell Ciliated Eptih. Cell Club Eptih. Cell DCs A DCs B DCs C Langerhans DCs pDCs Fibroblast Goblet Innate Lymphoid A Epithelial Immune Innate Lymphoid B Stromal Ionocyte Lymphatic UMAP1 Macrophage Alveolar Macrophage Mast Cell Mesothelial Cell Monocyte Non Classical Monocyte Myofbroblast NK Cell Pericyte PNEC Smooth muscle Cell TCelll Cyttooxic T Cell PRRX1 Regulatory T Cell IPF VE_arterial Control VE Capillary A VE Capillary B VE Peribronchial VE Veinous UMAP2 b PRRX1 mRNA expression AT1 AT2 Bcell Basal Eptih. Cell cDCs Ciliated Eptih. Cells Differentiat. Cilaited Eptih. Cell Endothelial cell Fibroblast HAS1 High Fibroblast KRT5-/KRT17+ Eptih. Cell Epithelial Lymphatic Endothelial cell Immune Stromal Macrophages Mast cell UMAP1 Mesothelial Cell Monocyte MUC5AC+ High Eptih. Cell MUC5B+ Eptih. Cell Myofbroblast NK pDCs Plasmacytoid B Cell PLIN2+ Fibroblast Proliferating Epith. Cell Proliferating Macrophage ILD Proliferating T Cell Control SCGB3A2+ Eptih. Cell SCGB3A2+ SCGB1A1+ Eptih. Cell PRRX1 Smooth muscle Cell TCell Transitional AT2 34 Supplemental Figure S2 : PRRX1 expression profiles at single cell resolution using the 35 “IPF Cell Atlas” web database (http://ipfcellatlas.com/). 36 (a-b) UMAP plots describing the distribution of PRRX1 expressing cells in different lung cell 37 lineage clusters were drawn with UMAP Explorer (upper part) using (a) Kropski’s and (b) 38 Misharin’s datasets. The labeling of each cell cluster (including all samples) are shown on the 39 left and PRRX1 relative expression in those clusters is shown on the right. In the lower part, 40 violin plots visualizing PRRX1 mRNA expression in each cell type stratified by disease states 41 (control lung cell types in blue (a-b) and IPF (a) or ILD (b) ones in red) were drawn with Gene 42 Explorer using (a) Kropski’s dataset and in (b) Misharin’s dataset. Note that PRRX1 mRNA 43 expression was associated with stromal clusters in both datasets (dashed lines in the upper 44 part and labels in bold font in the lower part). Abbreviations: AT1 (alveolar type 1 epithelial 45 cell), AT2 (alveolar type 2 epithelial cell), Epith. (epithelial), B Cell (B lymphocyte), T Cell (T 46 lymphocyte), DCs (DenDritic cells), pDCs (plasmacytoid DenDritic cells), NK Cell (Natural Killer 47 cell), PNEC (pulmonary neuroendocrine cell), VE (vascular enDothelium), ILD (interstitial lung 48 Disease). 49 3 a b Control IPF Control TGF-β1 PGE2 PRRX1 PRRX1 GAPDH GAPDH Total PRRX1 Total PRRX1 2.5 100 $ $ H H D D 2.0 ) l AP ) l a AP a s /G s /G 1.5 1 ba 1 ( X 10 ba ( X o i t RR o i a t 1.0 RR P r a Basal P r e v i e t v i Basal 0.5 a l t e a 1 l r e r 0.0 Control IPF Control IPF Control IPF Control IPF l a s H a O t B PRRX1 E PHAL DAPI 1 2 β E F G G P T TGFβ11ng/ml PGE2 100nM 0.6 1.0 ** 1.0 1.0 e e e 0.8 ** e * v v c * c e i 0.8 i I t t I v i en P a en a P t ** l l A 0.4 A a 0.8 sc e 0.8 e sc l D D r e r e 0.6 r e r r to to e 0.6 e uo uo e c c e e f f v n i v i n i i c 1 0.4 p 1 0.6 e p 0.6 at e n i at l X l X 0.2 c a c a p e e e r s R r s D c a D RR e R e s r P D 0.2 0.4 o P r o t e t o o r 0.4 o 0.4 u t u l o l f f u l 0.0 0.0 f 1 Basal TGFβ1 Basal TGFβ1 EtOH PGE2 EtOH PGE2 1 X 1 0.2 0.2 X 0.2 X R R R R Control IPF Control IPF R P R P P 0.0 0.0 0.0 EtOH PGE2 EtOH PGE2 Heparin FGF2 Heparin Basal TGFb Basal TGFb 10-7M 10-7M Supplemental1ng/mL Figure1ng/mL 3 20ng/mL Control IPF Control IPF Control 50 Supplemental Figure S3: Regulation of PRRX1 protein expression by growth factors as 51 assayed by immunoblots and immunofluorescence. 52 (a) Upper part: immunoblot showing PRRX1 expression in control and IPF primary Human 53 lung fibroblasts stimulated 48h with TGF-β1. GAPDH was used as loading control. Middle 54 panel: quantification of PRRX1 relative expression to GAPDH in control (circle) and IPF 55 (square) lung fibroblasts stimulated for 48h with TGF-β1 compared to basal condition (red 56 dashed line). Lower part: representative immunofluorescence images (n=7 per group) of 57 PRRX1 expression (red) in control and IPF lung fibroblasts at basal level or stimulated for 48h 58 with TGF-β1 (1ng/ml). DAPI was used as loading control. Actin fibers (green) were stained 59 with Phalloidin. The quantification of PRRX1 relative expression to DAPI in control (circle) and 60 IPF (square) lung fibroblasts at basal level or stimulated 48h with TGF-β1 is displayed as dot 61 plot with median on the lower panel. (b) Upper part: immunoblot showing PRRX1 expression 62 in control and IPF primary Human lung fibroblasts stimulated 48h with PGE2. GAPDH was 63 used as loading control. Middle panel: quantification of PRRX1 relative expression to GAPDH 64 in control (circle) and IPF (square) lung fibroblasts stimulated for 48h with PGE2 compared to 65 basal condition (red dashed line). Lower part: representative immunofluorescence images 66 (n=7 per group) of PRRX1 expression (red) in control and IPF lung fibroblasts stimulated for 67 48h with EtOH or PGE2 (100nM). DAPI was used as loading control. Actin fibers (green) were 68 stained with Phalloidin. The quantification of PRRX1 relative expression to DAPI in control 69 (circle) and IPF (square) lung fibroblasts stimulated for 48h with EtOH or PGE2 is displayed 70 as dot plot on the bottom. (c) Upper part: immunoblot showing PRRX1 expression in control 71 and IPF primary Human lung fibroblasts stimulated 48h with FGF2. GAPDH was used as 72 loading control. Middle panel: quantification of PRRX1 relative expression to GAPDH in control 73 (circle) and IPF (square) lung fibroblasts stimulated for 48h with FGF2 compared to basal 74 condition (red dashed line). Lower part: representative immunofluorescence images (n=7 per 75 group) of PRRX1 expression (red) in control and IPF lung fibroblasts stimulated for 48h with 76 Heparin or FGF2 (20ng/ml). DAPI was used as loading control. Actin fibers (green) were 77 stained with Phalloidin. The quantification of PRRX1 relative expression to DAPI in control 78 (circle) and IPF (square) lung fibroblasts stimulated 48h with Heparin or FGF2 is displayed as 79 dot plot with median on the bottom (Scale bar: 50µm), (Abbreviations: PhalloiDin (PHAL)).
Recommended publications
  • Propranolol-Mediated Attenuation of MMP-9 Excretion in Infants with Hemangiomas
    Supplementary Online Content Thaivalappil S, Bauman N, Saieg A, Movius E, Brown KJ, Preciado D. Propranolol-mediated attenuation of MMP-9 excretion in infants with hemangiomas. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2013.4773 eTable. List of All of the Proteins Identified by Proteomics This supplementary material has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work. © 2013 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 10/01/2021 eTable. List of All of the Proteins Identified by Proteomics Protein Name Prop 12 mo/4 Pred 12 mo/4 Δ Prop to Pred mo mo Myeloperoxidase OS=Homo sapiens GN=MPO 26.00 143.00 ‐117.00 Lactotransferrin OS=Homo sapiens GN=LTF 114.00 205.50 ‐91.50 Matrix metalloproteinase‐9 OS=Homo sapiens GN=MMP9 5.00 36.00 ‐31.00 Neutrophil elastase OS=Homo sapiens GN=ELANE 24.00 48.00 ‐24.00 Bleomycin hydrolase OS=Homo sapiens GN=BLMH 3.00 25.00 ‐22.00 CAP7_HUMAN Azurocidin OS=Homo sapiens GN=AZU1 PE=1 SV=3 4.00 26.00 ‐22.00 S10A8_HUMAN Protein S100‐A8 OS=Homo sapiens GN=S100A8 PE=1 14.67 30.50 ‐15.83 SV=1 IL1F9_HUMAN Interleukin‐1 family member 9 OS=Homo sapiens 1.00 15.00 ‐14.00 GN=IL1F9 PE=1 SV=1 MUC5B_HUMAN Mucin‐5B OS=Homo sapiens GN=MUC5B PE=1 SV=3 2.00 14.00 ‐12.00 MUC4_HUMAN Mucin‐4 OS=Homo sapiens GN=MUC4 PE=1 SV=3 1.00 12.00 ‐11.00 HRG_HUMAN Histidine‐rich glycoprotein OS=Homo sapiens GN=HRG 1.00 12.00 ‐11.00 PE=1 SV=1 TKT_HUMAN Transketolase OS=Homo sapiens GN=TKT PE=1 SV=3 17.00 28.00 ‐11.00 CATG_HUMAN Cathepsin G OS=Homo
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary File 2A Revised
    Supplementary file 2A. Differentially expressed genes in aldosteronomas compared to all other samples, ranked according to statistical significance. Missing values were not allowed in aldosteronomas, but to a maximum of five in the other samples. Acc UGCluster Name Symbol log Fold Change P - Value Adj. P-Value B R99527 Hs.8162 Hypothetical protein MGC39372 MGC39372 2,17 6,3E-09 5,1E-05 10,2 AA398335 Hs.10414 Kelch domain containing 8A KLHDC8A 2,26 1,2E-08 5,1E-05 9,56 AA441933 Hs.519075 Leiomodin 1 (smooth muscle) LMOD1 2,33 1,3E-08 5,1E-05 9,54 AA630120 Hs.78781 Vascular endothelial growth factor B VEGFB 1,24 1,1E-07 2,9E-04 7,59 R07846 Data not found 3,71 1,2E-07 2,9E-04 7,49 W92795 Hs.434386 Hypothetical protein LOC201229 LOC201229 1,55 2,0E-07 4,0E-04 7,03 AA454564 Hs.323396 Family with sequence similarity 54, member B FAM54B 1,25 3,0E-07 5,2E-04 6,65 AA775249 Hs.513633 G protein-coupled receptor 56 GPR56 -1,63 4,3E-07 6,4E-04 6,33 AA012822 Hs.713814 Oxysterol bining protein OSBP 1,35 5,3E-07 7,1E-04 6,14 R45592 Hs.655271 Regulating synaptic membrane exocytosis 2 RIMS2 2,51 5,9E-07 7,1E-04 6,04 AA282936 Hs.240 M-phase phosphoprotein 1 MPHOSPH -1,40 8,1E-07 8,9E-04 5,74 N34945 Hs.234898 Acetyl-Coenzyme A carboxylase beta ACACB 0,87 9,7E-07 9,8E-04 5,58 R07322 Hs.464137 Acyl-Coenzyme A oxidase 1, palmitoyl ACOX1 0,82 1,3E-06 1,2E-03 5,35 R77144 Hs.488835 Transmembrane protein 120A TMEM120A 1,55 1,7E-06 1,4E-03 5,07 H68542 Hs.420009 Transcribed locus 1,07 1,7E-06 1,4E-03 5,06 AA410184 Hs.696454 PBX/knotted 1 homeobox 2 PKNOX2 1,78 2,0E-06
    [Show full text]
  • The Correlation of Keratin Expression with In-Vitro Epithelial Cell Line Differentiation
    The correlation of keratin expression with in-vitro epithelial cell line differentiation Deeqo Aden Thesis submitted to the University of London for Degree of Master of Philosophy (MPhil) Supervisors: Professor Ian. C. Mackenzie Professor Farida Fortune Centre for Clinical and Diagnostic Oral Science Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry Queen Mary, University of London 2009 Contents Content pages ……………………………………………………………………......2 Abstract………………………………………………………………………….........6 Acknowledgements and Declaration……………………………………………...…7 List of Figures…………………………………………………………………………8 List of Tables………………………………………………………………………...12 Abbreviations….………………………………………………………………..…...14 Chapter 1: Literature review 16 1.1 Structure and function of the Oral Mucosa……………..…………….…..............17 1.2 Maintenance of the oral cavity...……………………………………….................20 1.2.1 Environmental Factors which damage the Oral Mucosa………. ….…………..21 1.3 Structure and function of the Oral Mucosa ………………...….……….………...21 1.3.1 Skin Barrier Formation………………………………………………….……...22 1.4 Comparison of Oral Mucosa and Skin…………………………………….……...24 1.5 Developmental and Experimental Models used in Oral mucosa and Skin...……..28 1.6 Keratinocytes…………………………………………………….….....................29 1.6.1 Desmosomes…………………………………………….…...............................29 1.6.2 Hemidesmosomes……………………………………….…...............................30 1.6.3 Tight Junctions………………………….……………….…...............................32 1.6.4 Gap Junctions………………………….……………….….................................32
    [Show full text]
  • G Protein-Coupled Receptors
    S.P.H. Alexander et al. The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16: G protein-coupled receptors. British Journal of Pharmacology (2015) 172, 5744–5869 THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16: G protein-coupled receptors Stephen PH Alexander1, Anthony P Davenport2, Eamonn Kelly3, Neil Marrion3, John A Peters4, Helen E Benson5, Elena Faccenda5, Adam J Pawson5, Joanna L Sharman5, Christopher Southan5, Jamie A Davies5 and CGTP Collaborators 1School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK, 2Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK, 3School of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK, 4Neuroscience Division, Medical Education Institute, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK, 5Centre for Integrative Physiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD, UK Abstract The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2015/16 provides concise overviews of the key properties of over 1750 human drug targets with their pharmacology, plus links to an open access knowledgebase of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. The full contents can be found at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ 10.1111/bph.13348/full. G protein-coupled receptors are one of the eight major pharmacological targets into which the Guide is divided, with the others being: ligand-gated ion channels, voltage-gated ion channels, other ion channels, nuclear hormone receptors, catalytic receptors, enzymes and transporters. These are presented with nomenclature guidance and summary information on the best available pharmacological tools, alongside key references and suggestions for further reading.
    [Show full text]
  • MALE Protein Name Accession Number Molecular Weight CP1 CP2 H1 H2 PDAC1 PDAC2 CP Mean H Mean PDAC Mean T-Test PDAC Vs. H T-Test
    MALE t-test t-test Accession Molecular H PDAC PDAC vs. PDAC vs. Protein Name Number Weight CP1 CP2 H1 H2 PDAC1 PDAC2 CP Mean Mean Mean H CP PDAC/H PDAC/CP - 22 kDa protein IPI00219910 22 kDa 7 5 4 8 1 0 6 6 1 0.1126 0.0456 0.1 0.1 - Cold agglutinin FS-1 L-chain (Fragment) IPI00827773 12 kDa 32 39 34 26 53 57 36 30 55 0.0309 0.0388 1.8 1.5 - HRV Fab 027-VL (Fragment) IPI00827643 12 kDa 4 6 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 - 0.0574 - 0.0 - REV25-2 (Fragment) IPI00816794 15 kDa 8 12 5 7 8 9 10 6 8 0.2225 0.3844 1.3 0.8 A1BG Alpha-1B-glycoprotein precursor IPI00022895 54 kDa 115 109 106 112 111 100 112 109 105 0.6497 0.4138 1.0 0.9 A2M Alpha-2-macroglobulin precursor IPI00478003 163 kDa 62 63 86 72 14 18 63 79 16 0.0120 0.0019 0.2 0.3 ABCB1 Multidrug resistance protein 1 IPI00027481 141 kDa 41 46 23 26 52 64 43 25 58 0.0355 0.1660 2.4 1.3 ABHD14B Isoform 1 of Abhydrolase domain-containing proteinIPI00063827 14B 22 kDa 19 15 19 17 15 9 17 18 12 0.2502 0.3306 0.7 0.7 ABP1 Isoform 1 of Amiloride-sensitive amine oxidase [copper-containing]IPI00020982 precursor85 kDa 1 5 8 8 0 0 3 8 0 0.0001 0.2445 0.0 0.0 ACAN aggrecan isoform 2 precursor IPI00027377 250 kDa 38 30 17 28 34 24 34 22 29 0.4877 0.5109 1.3 0.8 ACE Isoform Somatic-1 of Angiotensin-converting enzyme, somaticIPI00437751 isoform precursor150 kDa 48 34 67 56 28 38 41 61 33 0.0600 0.4301 0.5 0.8 ACE2 Isoform 1 of Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 precursorIPI00465187 92 kDa 11 16 20 30 4 5 13 25 5 0.0557 0.0847 0.2 0.4 ACO1 Cytoplasmic aconitate hydratase IPI00008485 98 kDa 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 - 0.0081 - 0.0
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Functionality of Proteins Involved in GPCR and G Protein Signaling: Making Sense of Structure–Function Continuum with In
    Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2019) 76:4461–4492 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-019-03276-1 Cellular andMolecular Life Sciences REVIEW Multi‑functionality of proteins involved in GPCR and G protein signaling: making sense of structure–function continuum with intrinsic disorder‑based proteoforms Alexander V. Fonin1 · April L. Darling2 · Irina M. Kuznetsova1 · Konstantin K. Turoverov1,3 · Vladimir N. Uversky2,4 Received: 5 August 2019 / Revised: 5 August 2019 / Accepted: 12 August 2019 / Published online: 19 August 2019 © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 Abstract GPCR–G protein signaling system recognizes a multitude of extracellular ligands and triggers a variety of intracellular signal- ing cascades in response. In humans, this system includes more than 800 various GPCRs and a large set of heterotrimeric G proteins. Complexity of this system goes far beyond a multitude of pair-wise ligand–GPCR and GPCR–G protein interactions. In fact, one GPCR can recognize more than one extracellular signal and interact with more than one G protein. Furthermore, one ligand can activate more than one GPCR, and multiple GPCRs can couple to the same G protein. This defnes an intricate multifunctionality of this important signaling system. Here, we show that the multifunctionality of GPCR–G protein system represents an illustrative example of the protein structure–function continuum, where structures of the involved proteins represent a complex mosaic of diferently folded regions (foldons, non-foldons, unfoldons, semi-foldons, and inducible foldons). The functionality of resulting highly dynamic conformational ensembles is fne-tuned by various post-translational modifcations and alternative splicing, and such ensembles can undergo dramatic changes at interaction with their specifc partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded 18 July 2014 with a 1% False Discovery Rate (FDR)
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Chemical glycoproteomics for identification and discovery of glycoprotein alterations in human cancer Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0t47b9ws Author Spiciarich, David Publication Date 2017 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Chemical glycoproteomics for identification and discovery of glycoprotein alterations in human cancer by David Spiciarich A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Chemistry in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Carolyn R. Bertozzi, Co-Chair Professor David E. Wemmer, Co-Chair Professor Matthew B. Francis Professor Amy E. Herr Fall 2017 Chemical glycoproteomics for identification and discovery of glycoprotein alterations in human cancer © 2017 by David Spiciarich Abstract Chemical glycoproteomics for identification and discovery of glycoprotein alterations in human cancer by David Spiciarich Doctor of Philosophy in Chemistry University of California, Berkeley Professor Carolyn R. Bertozzi, Co-Chair Professor David E. Wemmer, Co-Chair Changes in glycosylation have long been appreciated to be part of the cancer phenotype; sialylated glycans are found at elevated levels on many types of cancer and have been implicated in disease progression. However, the specific glycoproteins that contribute to cell surface sialylation are not well characterized, specifically in bona fide human cancer. Metabolic and bioorthogonal labeling methods have previously enabled enrichment and identification of sialoglycoproteins from cultured cells and model organisms. The goal of this work was to develop technologies that can be used for detecting changes in glycoproteins in clinical models of human cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Genetics and Neurobiological Pathways Behind Addiction (Review)
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE 21: 544, 2021 Understanding the genetics and neurobiological pathways behind addiction (Review) ALEXANDRA POPESCU1, MARIA MARIAN1*, ANA MIRUNA DRĂGOI1* and RADU‑VIRGIL COSTEA2* 1Department of Psychiatry, ‘Prof. Dr. Alex. Obregia’ Clinical Hospital of Psychiatry, 041914 Bucharest; 2Department of General Surgery, ‘Carol Davila’ University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania Received January 15, 2021; Accepted February 15, 2021 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2021.9976 Abstract. The hypothesis issued by modern medicine states 1. Introduction that many diseases known to humans are genetically deter‑ mined, influenced or not by environmental factors, which is Substance‑related disorders are a set of behavioral, cognitive applicable to most psychiatric disorders as well. This article and physiological phenomena that occur after repeated use of a focuses on two pending questions regarding addiction: substance. These typically include: A strong desire to continue Why do some individuals become addicted while others do using a drug, difficulties in controlling its use, persistence in not? along with Is it a learned behavior or is it genetically using it although it has negative consequences, the use of the predefined? Recent data suggest that addiction is more than substance taking precedence over other activities and obliga‑ repeated exposure, it is the synchronicity between intrinsic tions, along with high tolerance and sometimes withdrawal (1). factors (genotype, sex, age, preexisting addictive disorder, New developments have altered the way we define addiction. or other mental illness), extrinsic factors (childhood, level of In this sense the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental education, socioeconomic status, social support, entourage, Disorders (5th ed.) (DSM‑5) (2) has changed the related chapter drug availability) and the nature of the addictive agent (phar‑ from ‘Substance‑Related Disorders’ to ‘Substance‑Related macokinetics, path of administration, psychoactive properties).
    [Show full text]
  • Download (PDF)
    Supplemental Information Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin Promoter Methylation Profiles between Human Lung Adenocarcinoma Multidrug Resistant A549/Cisplatin (A549/DDP) Cells and Its Progenitor A549 Cells Ruiling Guo, Guoming Wu, Haidong Li, Pin Qian, Juan Han, Feng Pan, Wenbi Li, Jin Li, and Fuyun Ji © 2013 The Pharmaceutical Society of Japan Table S1. Gene categories involved in biological functions with hypomethylated promoter identified by MeDIP-ChIP analysis in lung adenocarcinoma MDR A549/DDP cells compared with its progenitor A549 cells Different biological Genes functions transcription factor MYOD1, CDX2, HMX1, THRB, ARNT2, ZNF639, HOXD13, RORA, FOXO3, HOXD10, CITED1, GATA1, activity HOXC6, ZGPAT, HOXC8, ATOH1, FLI1, GATA5, HOXC4, HOXC5, PHTF1, RARB, MYST2, RARG, SIX3, FOXN1, ZHX3, HMG20A, SIX4, NR0B1, SIX6, TRERF1, DDIT3, ASCL1, MSX1, HIF1A, BAZ1B, MLLT10, FOXG1, DPRX, SHOX, ST18, CCRN4L, TFE3, ZNF131, SOX5, TFEB, MYEF2, VENTX, MYBL2, SOX8, ARNT, VDR, DBX2, FOXQ1, MEIS3, HOXA6, LHX2, NKX2-1, TFDP3, LHX6, EWSR1, KLF5, SMAD7, MAFB, SMAD5, NEUROG1, NR4A1, NEUROG3, GSC2, EN2, ESX1, SMAD1, KLF15, ZSCAN1, VAV1, GAS7, USF2, MSL3, SHOX2, DLX2, ZNF215, HOXB2, LASS3, HOXB5, ETS2, LASS2, DLX5, TCF12, BACH2, ZNF18, TBX21, E2F8, PRRX1, ZNF154, CTCF, PAX3, PRRX2, CBFA2T2, FEV, FOS, BARX1, PCGF2, SOX15, NFIL3, RBPJL, FOSL1, ALX1, EGR3, SOX14, FOXJ1, ZNF92, OTX1, ESR1, ZNF142, FOSB, MIXL1, PURA, ZFP37, ZBTB25, ZNF135, HOXC13, KCNH8, ZNF483, IRX4, ZNF367, NFIX, NFYB, ZBTB16, TCF7L1, HIC1, TSC22D1, TSC22D2, REXO4, POU3F2, MYOG, NFATC2, ENO1,
    [Show full text]
  • A Bioinformatics Model of Human Diseases on the Basis Of
    SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS A Bioinformatics Model of Human Diseases on the basis of Differentially Expressed Genes (of Domestic versus Wild Animals) That Are Orthologs of Human Genes Associated with Reproductive-Potential Changes Vasiliev1,2 G, Chadaeva2 I, Rasskazov2 D, Ponomarenko2 P, Sharypova2 E, Drachkova2 I, Bogomolov2 A, Savinkova2 L, Ponomarenko2,* M, Kolchanov2 N, Osadchuk2 A, Oshchepkov2 D, Osadchuk2 L 1 Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia; 2 Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia; * Correspondence: [email protected]. Tel.: +7 (383) 363-4963 ext. 1311 (M.P.) Supplementary data on effects of the human gene underexpression or overexpression under this study on the reproductive potential Table S1. Effects of underexpression or overexpression of the human genes under this study on the reproductive potential according to our estimates [1-5]. ↓ ↑ Human Deficit ( ) Excess ( ) # Gene NSNP Effect on reproductive potential [Reference] ♂♀ NSNP Effect on reproductive potential [Reference] ♂♀ 1 increased risks of preeclampsia as one of the most challenging 1 ACKR1 ← increased risk of atherosclerosis and other coronary artery disease [9] ← [3] problems of modern obstetrics [8] 1 within a model of human diseases using Adcyap1-knockout mice, 3 in a model of human health using transgenic mice overexpressing 2 ADCYAP1 ← → [4] decreased fertility [10] [4] Adcyap1 within only pancreatic β-cells, ameliorated diabetes [11] 2 within a model of human diseases
    [Show full text]
  • Early During Myelomagenesis Alterations in DNA Methylation That
    Myeloma Is Characterized by Stage-Specific Alterations in DNA Methylation That Occur Early during Myelomagenesis This information is current as Christoph J. Heuck, Jayesh Mehta, Tushar Bhagat, Krishna of September 23, 2021. Gundabolu, Yiting Yu, Shahper Khan, Grigoris Chrysofakis, Carolina Schinke, Joseph Tariman, Eric Vickrey, Natalie Pulliam, Sangeeta Nischal, Li Zhou, Sanchari Bhattacharyya, Richard Meagher, Caroline Hu, Shahina Maqbool, Masako Suzuki, Samir Parekh, Frederic Reu, Ulrich Steidl, John Greally, Amit Verma and Seema B. Downloaded from Singhal J Immunol 2013; 190:2966-2975; Prepublished online 13 February 2013; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202493 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/190/6/2966 http://www.jimmunol.org/ Supplementary http://www.jimmunol.org/content/suppl/2013/02/13/jimmunol.120249 Material 3.DC1 References This article cites 38 articles, 15 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/190/6/2966.full#ref-list-1 by guest on September 23, 2021 Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2013 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.
    [Show full text]