DOCSLIB.ORG

Negation Processing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Negation Processing NEGATION PROCESSING A DYNAMIC PRAGMATIC ACCOUNT YE TIAN Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics UCL 2014 Declaration I, Ye Tian, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Acknowledgements First and foremost, my wholehearted thanks go to my supervisor Richard Breheny. I am honoured to have been his PhD student, and to have been guided, challenged and inspired by him. I have developed as a linguist and a critical thinker because of Richard. Special thanks go to Robyn Carston for her tremendous help and encouragement during my writing up period. Thank you Nathan Klinedinst for your insightful comments and ideas. Thank you Bob van Tiel for the help with constructing experiment items in Dutch and for data collection. Thank you Billy Clark and Sylvia Shaw for giving me the opportunity to develop as a teacher. My thanks also go to Andrew Nevins, Alison Hall, Ad Neelman and Hans van de Koot, Andrea Santi, Nino Grillo, Matthew Reeve, Kriszta Szendroi, Yasu Sudo for your interesting discussions and support. My PhD journey wouldn’t have been as rewarding and fun as it would have been without the discussions, support, the friendship and the daily jokes from the supercalifragilisticexpialidocious PhD bunch in Chandler House. Thank you Zoë Belk, Harris Constantinou, Natalia Cichosz, Thiago Galery, Felicity Deamer, Giulio Dulcinati, Elizabeth Eden, Elena Titov, Patrick Elliott, Matthew Gotham, Claire Grant, Sam Green, Jiri Kaspar, Akis Kechagias, Ya-Fang Lu, Giorgos Markopoulos, Diana Mazzarella, Nick Neasom, Isabelle Needham-Didsbury, Ezekiel Panitz, Thanasis Soultatis, Chao Sun, Irini Symeonidou, Kevin Tang, Maria Varkanitsa, and Xiaobei Zheng. Thank you PhD-writing-lab: Chrissy Meijins, Maarten Steenhagen, Kathrine Cuccuru, Neil Barton, and particularly Johnny Mclntosh for introducing me to this life saving group and for the conversations in linguistics, philosophy and writing. Last but not least, I want to thank my wonderful husband for his incredible support and encouragement throughout my MA and PhD journey, for reading my writing, for listening to me, and for putting up with me. Thank you father and mother for your encouragement, support and love. Abstract This thesis investigates the processing of negative assertions. Psycholinguistic research shows that out-of-context negative sentences are more difficult to process than positive sentences. In the early stages of negation processing, the positive counterpart is often represented. Pragmatic research shows that negative sentences have richer pragmatic functions than positive sentences. These findings require a theory of negative sentence processing that can account for both the processing effects and pragmatic functions. Among current theories, a popular approach – rejection approach – attributes the processing effects to the processing of the linguistically coded meaning of negative sentences. They propose that negative sentences are represented as the rejection of their positive counterparts. They state that the representation of the positive counterpart is a mandatory first step of negation processing, and explain the processing cost in terms of the extra step of embedding. Arguing against current theories (especially rejection accounts), I propose the dynamic pragmatic account. In general, sentence processing – with or without explicit context- should not only involve processing the linguistically coded content, but also involve inferring pragmatically retrieved content such as how the sentence relates to the broader discourse. Specifically, when we interpret an assertion, we not only process the asserted meaning, but also the Question Under Discussion (QUD) addressed by this assertion, which can be retrieved and accommodated using linguistic and non-linguistic cues. Negation is a cue for retrieving the prominent QUD. Without contextual support or further cues, the most prominent QUD for a negative sentence ¬p is the positive question whether p. The projection of this positive QUD is due to the most frequent uses of negation, and is sensitive to other factors (e.g. frequency of the predicate and context) and other QUD cues (e.g. prosodic focus and cleft construction). I propose that the accommodation of a positive QUD contributes to the processing cost of negation, explains why the positive counterparts are often represented, and accounts for the pragmatic effects of negative sentences. The dynamic pragmatic account and competing theories are tested in three series of experiments in Chapters 3-5. In Chapter 3, I show that the representation of the positive counterpart is not a mandatory first step for negation processing. Rather it is likely due to QUD accommodation. When a negative sentence projects a negative prominent QUD (such as a cleft negative sentence “It is John who hasn’t ironed his shirt”), the positive counterpart is no longer represented. In Chapter 4, I investigate the verification of negative sentences against pictures. Previous studies have reported inconsistent results where verifying true negative sentences can take less, equal amount or more time than verifying false negatives. I argue that two strategies can be used in the task: the default strategy and the truth-functional strategy. The default strategy is to infer and represent the situation that makes the sentence true and compare it with the evidence. In addition, the accommodation of the positive QUD may encourage the development of a truth-functional strategy, in which participants answer the positive QUD and then switch the truth index. I show that when negative sentences project positive QUDs, there is a training effect: the reaction time pattern of true and false negatives change over time, indicating a development of a task- specific strategy; on the other hand, when negative sentences project negative QUDs, participants no longer develop the task-specific strategy. In Chapter 5, I investigate the time course of negative sentence processing in a visual world eye-tracking study. The results show that processing simple negative sentences is delayed compared to processing simple positives, but processing cleft negatives is no more delayed than processing cleft positives. Importantly, both QUD accommodation and the integration of the meaning of negation can happen incrementally. Overall, the findings speak against current models of negation processing (especially rejection accounts), and support the dynamic pragmatic account. Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................ 14 Scope of research: negative assertions ................................................................... 18 Chapter 1 Negation processing – findings and accounts ........................................ 21 1.1 Findings in negation processing ................................................................. 21 1.1.1 Negation processing: the extra effort ..................................................... 21 1.1.2 Negation and the representation of the positive counterpart .................. 27 1.1.3 Negated words are less accessible.......................................................... 34 1.1.4 Negation is not difficult with context..................................................... 39 1.2 Current Accounts ....................................................................................... 44 1.2.1 Grammatical transformation .................................................................. 45 1.2.2 Rejection accounts ................................................................................. 47 1.2.3 Contextual approach............................................................................... 51 1.3 Summary .................................................................................................... 54 Chapter 2 Dynamic pragmatic account of negation processing ............................. 55 2.1 Dynamic semantic/ pragmatic approach to meaning ................................. 56 2.2 Context ....................................................................................................... 58 2.2.1 Stalnakerean common ground ................................................................ 61 4 2.2.2 Moves ..................................................................................................... 62 2.2.3 QUD ....................................................................................................... 63 2.3 Utterance interpretation .............................................................................. 64 2.3.1 Presupposition accommodation ............................................................. 66 2.3.2 QUD accommodation............................................................................. 68 2.4 Dynamic pragmatic account of negation processing ................................. 69 2.4.1 What is accommodated is a question rather than a proposition ............. 71 2.4.2 Positive versus Negative assertions ....................................................... 74 2.4.3 Processing negative sentences out of context ........................................ 75 2.5 Summary .................................................................................................... 77 Chapter 3 Negation and the representation of the positive counterpart – a probe recognition study
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 1 Negation in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective
    Chapter 1 Negation in a cross-linguistic perspective 0. Chapter summary This chapter introduces the empirical scope of our study on the expression and interpretation of negation in natural language. We start with some background notions on negation in logic and language, and continue with a discussion of more linguistic issues concerning negation at the syntax-semantics interface. We zoom in on cross- linguistic variation, both in a synchronic perspective (typology) and in a diachronic perspective (language change). Besides expressions of propositional negation, this book analyzes the form and interpretation of indefinites in the scope of negation. This raises the issue of negative polarity and its relation to negative concord. We present the main facts, criteria, and proposals developed in the literature on this topic. The chapter closes with an overview of the book. We use Optimality Theory to account for the syntax and semantics of negation in a cross-linguistic perspective. This theoretical framework is introduced in Chapter 2. 1 Negation in logic and language The main aim of this book is to provide an account of the patterns of negation we find in natural language. The expression and interpretation of negation in natural language has long fascinated philosophers, logicians, and linguists. Horn’s (1989) Natural history of negation opens with the following statement: “All human systems of communication contain a representation of negation. No animal communication system includes negative utterances, and consequently, none possesses a means for assigning truth value, for lying, for irony, or for coping with false or contradictory statements.” A bit further on the first page, Horn states: “Despite the simplicity of the one-place connective of propositional logic ( ¬p is true if and only if p is not true) and of the laws of inference in which it participate (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Syntax of Answers to Negative Yes/No-Questions in English Anders Holmberg Newcastle University
    The syntax of answers to negative yes/no-questions in English Anders Holmberg Newcastle University 1. Introduction This paper will argue that answers to polar questions or yes/no-questions (YNQs) in English are elliptical expressions with basically the structure (1), where IP is identical to the LF of the IP of the question, containing a polarity variable with two possible values, affirmative or negative, which is assigned a value by the focused polarity expression. (1) yes/no Foc [IP ...x... ] The crucial data come from answers to negative questions. English turns out to have a fairly complicated system, with variation depending on which negation is used. The meaning of the answer yes in (2) is straightforward, affirming that John is coming. (2) Q(uestion): Isn’t John coming, too? A(nswer): Yes. (‘John is coming.’) In (3) (for speakers who accept this question as well formed), 1 the meaning of yes alone is indeterminate, and it is therefore not a felicitous answer in this context. The longer version is fine, affirming that John is coming. (3) Q: Isn’t John coming, either? A: a. #Yes. b. Yes, he is. In (4), there is variation regarding the interpretation of yes. Depending on the context it can be a confirmation of the negation in the question, meaning ‘John is not coming’. In other contexts it will be an infelicitous answer, as in (3). (4) Q: Is John not coming? A: a. Yes. (‘John is not coming.’) b. #Yes. In all three cases the (bare) answer no is unambiguous, meaning that John is not coming.
    [Show full text]
  • Affirmative and Negated Modality*
    Quaderns de Filologia. Estudis lingüístics. Vol. XIV (2009) 169-192 AFFIRMATIVE AND NEGATED MODALITY* Günter Radden Hamburg 0. INTR O DUCTI O N 0.1. Stating the problem Descriptions of modality in English often give the impression that the behaviour of modal verbs is erratic when they occur with negation. A particularly intriguing case is the behaviour of the modal verb must under negation. In its deontic sense, must is used both in affirmative and negated sentences, expressing obligation (1a) and prohibition (1b), respectively. In its epistemic sense, however, must is only used in affirmative sentences expressing necessity (2a). The modal verb that expresses the corresponding negated epistemic modality, i.e. impossibility, is can’t (2b). (1) a. You must switch off your mobile phone. [obligation] b. You mustn’t switch off your mobile phone. [prohibition] (2) a. Your mobile phone must be switched off. [necessity] b. Your mobile phone can’t be switched off. [impossibility] Explanations that have been offered for the use of epistemic can’t are not very helpful. Palmer (1990: 61) argues that mustn’t is not used for the negation of epistemic necessity because can’t is supplied, and Coates (1983: 20) suggests that can’t is used because mustn’t is unavailable. Both “explanations” beg the question: why should can’t be used to denote negated necessity and why should mustn’t be unavailable? Such questions have apparently not been asked for two interrelated reasons: first, the study of modality and negation has been dominated by logic and, secondly, since the modal verbs apparently do * An earlier version of this paper was published in Władysław Chłopicki, Andrzej Pawelec, and Agnieszka Pokojska (eds.), 2007, Cognition in Language: Volume in Honour of Professor Elżbieta Tabakowska, 224-254.
    [Show full text]
  • Negation, Referentiality and Boundedness In
    WECATfON, REFERENTLALm ANT) BOUNDEDNESS flV BRETON A CASE STUDY Dl MARKEDNESS ANI) ASYMMETRY Nathalie Simone rMarie Schapansky B.A. (French), %=on Fraser University 1990 M.A. (Linguistics), Simon Fraser university 1992 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIEiEMEN'I'S FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of Linguistics @Nathalie Simone Marie Schapansky, 1996 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY November 1996 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. BibiiotMque nationale du Canada Acquisitions and Direction des acquisitions et Bibliogra~hicServices Branch des services bibiiographiques Your hie Vorre rbference Our hle Notre r6Orence The author has granted an k'auteur a accorde une licence irrevocable nsn-exclusive f icence irtct5vocable et non exclusive allowing the National Library of perrnettant a la Bibliotheque Canada to reproduce, loan, nationale du Canada de distribute or sell copies of reproduire, prgttor, distribuer ou his/her thesis by any means and vendre des copies de sa these in any form or format, making de quelque rnaniere et sous this thesis available to interested quelque forme que ce soit pour persons. mettre des exemplaires de cette these a la disposition des personnes interessees. The author retains ownership of L'auteur conserve la propriete du the copyright in his/her thesis. droit d'auteur qui protege sa Neither the thesis nor substantial these. Ni la these ni des extraits extracts from it may be printed or substantiels de celle-ci ne otherwise reproduced without doivent &re imprimes ou his/her permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Aug 3 1 1990 Ubraries ,% Abstract
    NEGATION IN SYNTAX: ON THE NATURE OF FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES AND PROJECTIONS by MIREN ITZIAR LAKA MUGARZA B.A. University of the Basque Country (1985) M.A. University of the Basque Country (1986) SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF LINGUISTICS & PHILOSOPHY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT.OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN LINGUISTICS at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY August, 1990 c Miren Itziar Laka Mugarza The author hereby grants to M.I.T. permission to reproduce and to distribute copies of this thesis document in whole or in part Signature of Author Department of Linguilstics & Philosophy Certified by A .. ....- - r S-, Keneth Hale Thesis Supervisor Accepted by . M Wayne O'0Neil OMTASSACHUIEIT Departamen al Committee AUG 3 1 1990 UBRARIES ,% ABSTRACT. The central concern of this work is the syntactic nature of negation in Universal Grammar, and its relation to other functional elements in the Syntax. The study argues that negation is not a syntactic category on its own; rather, it is one of the values of a more abstract syntactic category, named E, which includes other sentence operators, such as affirmation and emphasis (Chapter 2). It is also argued that the syntactic feature [negation] surfaces in other syntactic categories besides E. In particular, the existence of (N] (negative) Complementizers is defended; this acounts for a range of phenomena in various languages: across-the-clause licensing of Negative Polarity Items in English, the ditribution of the -nik complementizer in Basque, and the nature of Dubitative Subjunctive in Romance (Chapter 3). Chapter I argues for the existence of a universal requirement that inflectional heads such as negation (E) must be c-commanded by the syntactic head Tense at S- structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Expression and Interpretation of Negation: an OT Typology
    [REVIEW ] Expression and Interpretation of Negation: An OT Typology By Henriëtte de Swart, Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 77, Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York, 2010, xvii+279pp. KIYOKO KATAOKA Kanagawa University* Keywords: bidirectional Optimality Theory, negative concord, double nega- tion, universality, markedness 1. Introduction The work aims to give a unified view of negation, polarity, and con- cord across different languages, dialects and diachronic stages of a lan- guage. The author takes her work as providing a general theory of human language and cognition to account for cross-linguistic variation in synchronic terms as well as diachronic terms. The basic view comes from the thesis by Dahl (1979) that negation is a universal category of natural language and also the thesis by de Swart (2009) that it is presumably a universal category of human cognition. Though cross-linguistic variation is a major topic, from both a synchronic (typology) and a diachronic (language change) perspective, the book inves- tigates mainly the negative indefinites (so-called n-words, which de Swart refers to as Neg-expressions) to draw the whole picture of Negative Concord (NC), where more than one Neg-expression leads to a single negation, and Double Negation (DN), where two Neg-expressions lead to a double nega- tion. Under the assumption that knowledge of first-order logic is part of human cognition, de Swart concentrates on how propositional negation in sentence structure is derived involving Neg-expressions, and tries to con- struct the same underlying mechanisms to exploit the relations between form * I am very grateful to Jennifer L.
    [Show full text]
  • Between Both of These and the Process of Short Time, and He
    1 DOCUMENT RESUME AL 001 322 ED 021 218 48 By- McNeill, David THE DEVELOPMENT OF LANGUAGE Behavior. Michigan Univ., Ann Arbor. Centerfcr Research on Language and Language Spons Agency- Office of Education(DHEW), Washington, D.C. Bureauof Research Bureau No- BR- 6-1784 Pub Date 1 Feb 68 Con trac t OEC- 3- 6-061784- 0508 Behavior, Progress Report No.VI. Note-226p.; Supplementary Report toStudies in Language and Language EDRS Price MF-S1.00 HC-$9.12 DEVELOPMENT, PHONOLOGY, Descriptors-*CHILD DEVELOPMENT, *CHILD LANGUAGE *LANGUAGE SYNTAX, TRANSFORMATIONS (LANGUAGE), *PSYCHOLINGUISTICS,SEMANTICS SURFACE STRUCTURE *VERBAL DEVELOPMENT This chapter, to be included in"Carmichael's Manual of ChildPsychology," edited by P.A. Mussen, deals with the connectionbetween the acquisitionof language and the growth of intellect, and the connectionbetween both of these andthe process of account for maturation. The authorfeels that various theoriesof development cannot the child's acquisition of grammarin a relativelyshort time, and hediscusses the bulk of the chapter reasons aswell as the lines which theexplanation must follow. The is a survey oflanguage acquisition itself.It is organized underthree major headings, of a grammar: syntax,phonology, and one for eachof the three main components of semantics. A descriptionof the methods typically used instudying the development The emergence of the componentsthemselves is traced each component is given. light of (insofar as it is known), and adiscussion of varioustheoretical issues in the of children the empirical findings ispresented. Wherever possible,mention is made exposed to languages otherthan English, with thechief contrast languagesbeing Russian and Japanese. (Seerelated document ED 017921.) (DO) -05C-.3-6-06/7047-1).5-08 e-r44111)1e.2146/F 'THEUNIVERSITY OFMICHIGAII i3X 6- 17P/ ?1,s1 011 Studies in Language and Intot - .7.
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive Analysis of Double Negation
    ISSN 1799-2591 Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 1, No. 10, pp. 1442-1445, October 2011 © 2011 ACADEMY PUBLISHER Manufactured in Finland. doi:10.4304/tpls.1.10.1442-1445 A Constructive Study of English and Chinese Double Negation Fushan Sun Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China Email: [email protected] Abstract—As a universally used linguistic structure, double negation has long attracted the attention of scholars in Chinese and foreign countries. But so far the research of double negation is limited to the study and analysis of negative words, negative markers and the surface structure of double negation, and is also restricted to one particular language. In this essay, based on contrastive linguistics and cognitive linguistics, I launch a comparison between English double negation and its Chinese counterpart from the cognitive perspective to identify similarities and differences between them, and furthermore I also attempt to elaborate the causes and motivations for its meaning. Index Terms—double negation, cognitive, iconicity, M—Principle What is the basis of the sense of double negation? Many linguists are interested in and concentrate on this issue. Palmer and Otto Jespersen are the most typical representatives of these scholars. Palmer said that two negative elements cancel each other to form a positive sense in a sentence. Otto Jespersen (1939) explains "All the languages seem to have a common law, that is, two negative makes a positive". In fact, this theoretical basis used the principle of logic that "two noes mean a yes". As to the issue why double negation can strengthen the.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Negation ∗ J.L
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Journal of Applied Logic 8 (2010) 277–301 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Applied Logic www.elsevier.com/locate/jal A brief history of negation ∗ J.L. Speranza a,LaurenceR.Hornb, a Argentine Society for Philosophical Analysis, St. Michael Hall, Calle 58, No. 611, La Plata, Buenos Aires, B1900 BPY, Argentina b Department of Linguistics, Yale University, P.O. Box 208366, New Haven, CT 06520, USA article info abstract Article history: The history of scholarship on negation tracks and illuminates the major developments Available online 14 April 2010 in the history of metaphysics, philosophy of language, and philosophy of mind, from Parmenides, Plato and Aristotle through Frege, Russell, and Wittgenstein to contemporary Keywords: formal theorists. Our perspective focuses on the catalytic role played by the 20th century Negation philosopher of language Paul Grice, whose views on negation serve as a fulcrum for Grice Neo-Traditionalists his attempt to bridge the (neo-)Traditionalist and Formalist traditions in logical thought. Modernists Grice’s remarks on negation and speaker meaning and the elaboration of his ideas by Contradictory negation subsequent neo-Griceans are summarized and situated within a broader picture of the Contrary negation role of contradictory and contrary negation in the frameworks of Aristotelians, Medievals, Asymmetry of affirmation and negation early modern schoolmaster-logicians, 19th and early 20th century neo-Idealists and Formalists, Oxford ordinary-language analytics, practitioners of classical and non-classical logics, and a range of other philosophers and linguists.
    [Show full text]
  • Negation in Syntax--On the Nature of Functional Categories and Projections
    NEGATION IN SYNTAX: ON THE NATURE OF FUNCTIONAL CATEGORIES AND PROJECTIONS HIREN ITZIAR LAKA HUGARZA B.A. University of the Basque Country ( 1985) H.A. University of the Basque Country ( 1986) SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF LINGUISTICS & PHILOSOPHY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREHENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF f HILOSOPHY IN LINGUISTICS at the HASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY August, 1990 c Hiren Itziar Laka Mugarza The author hereby grants to H.I.T. permission to reproduce and to distribute copies of this thesis document in whole or in part Signature of Author /hr- bkJz artment of ~ingui'6tics& Philosophy Cestif ied by r-- Keneth Hale Thesis Supervi~or \ n PA A Wayne 0 '.Neil O'A~~*~H~~#~ZTCY~,OF TE Departanen .el Committee AUG 3 1IS90 The central concern of this work is the syntactic nature of negation in Universal Grammar, and its relation to other functional elements in the Syntax. The study argues that negation is not a syntactic category on its own; rather, it is one of the values of a more abstract syntactic category, named X, which includes other sentence operators, such as affirmation and emphasis (Chapter 2). It is also argued that the syntactic feature [negation] surfaces in other syntactic categories besides X. In particular, the existence of [Nl (negative) Complementizers is defended; this acounts for a range of phenomena in various lanquages: across-the-clause licensing of Negative Polarity Items in English, the ditribution of the -nik complementizer in Basque, and the nature of Dubitative Subjunctive in Romance (Chapter 3). Chapter 1 argues for the existence of a universal requirement that inflectional heads such as negation (Z) must be c-commanded by the syntactic head Tense at S- structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Basque Functional Heads
    Sentence Polarity and Word Order in Basque1 A well-known fact about Basque is that word order is sensitive to sentence polarity. In negative sentences, the relative order of the auxiliary and main verb is V-Aux, while in affirmative (neutral) sentences the order is Neg-Aux-V. The main goal of this paper is to argue for a new approach to this phenomenon within a grammar that assumes antisymmetry (Kayne 1994), and only XP movement. The proposal has two main components. First, drawing on Cinque‘s (1999) universal hierarchy of functional heads, it argues that the negative order—Aux-V—is the merged order. The affirmative V-Aux order is produced by raising of the VP to a higher, polarity-related position called PolP. Second, PolP is also argued to host the negative morpheme, ez, in negative sentences, and the emphatic marker, ba, in emphatic affirmatives. Evidence from scope interaction between negation and evidential and speech act particles suggests that the surface position of ez cannot be its merged position; rather ez is merged in a lower position and raises to spec, PolP. Part 1 of this paper discusses the surface ordering of clausal functional heads within Cinque‘s (1999) framework, and argues for VP raising in affirmative sentences. Part 2 argues for raising of ez to PolP. Part 3 discusses the behavior of verbal dependents drawing on Koopman and Szabolcsi‘s (2000) analysis of verb movement in Hungarian, German and Dutch. Part 4 addresses some remaining empirical problems. 1 1. The surface order of functional morphemes within Cinque’s
    [Show full text]
  • Negation, Indefinites, and Polarity in Early Greek and Indo- Iranian: a Typological and Comparative Approach
    UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID FACULTAD DE FILOLOGÍA TESIS DOCTORAL Negation, indefinites, and polarity in early Greek and Indo- Iranian: a typological and comparative approach (Negación, indefinidos y polaridad en griego antiguo e indo- iranio: un estudio tipológico y comparativo) MEMORIA PARA OPTAR AL GRADO DE DOCTOR PRESENTADA POR Juan Eugenio Briceño Villalobos Directores Juan Antonio Álvarez-Pedrosa Núñez Eugenio Ramón Luján Martínez Madrid © Juan Eugenio Briceño Villalobos, 2019 Programa de Doctorado de Estudios del Mundo Antiguo Facultad de Filología TESIS DOCTORAL Negation, indefinites, and polarity in early Greek and Indo-Iranian: a typological and comparative approach (Negación, indefinidos y polaridad en griego antiguo e indo-iranio: un estudio tipológico y comparativo) MEMORIA PARA OPTAR AL GRADO DE DOCTOR PRESENTADA POR Juan Eugenio Briceño Villalobos Directores Juan Antonio Álvarez-Pedrosa Núñez Eugenio Ramón Luján Martínez Madrid, 2019 For my parents, Gladys and Pedro, to whom I owe everything. Acknowledgements There is not enough space in several books to openly show my gratitude to all those who supported me through this long journey called “writing a dissertation” and thanks to whom I am writing right now these truly heart-felt words. I must say it has been a challenging journey, but nevertheless, fascinating. Thus, in spite of said handicaps, I will endeavor in this small section to enumerate all those who I believe deserve written mention, since, as the poet said, verba volant, sed scrīpta mānent. First thing first and with my parents’ excuse, I must first express my gratitude to that person who was literally there for me all the way from the start until the last word written in these pages.
    [Show full text]