8 Impact Assessment and Mitigation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

8 Impact Assessment and Mitigation Zambezi River Authority Public Disclosure Authorized Kariba Dam Rehabilitation Project (KDRP) Volume I Public Disclosure Authorized Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Revised October 14, 2020 Zambezi River Authority Kariba Table of Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Background ....................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Objectives .......................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Project Proponent .......................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Purpose of this Report ................................................................................................... 3 1.5 International and Regulatory Requirements for ESIA................................................... 3 1.6 ESIA Methodology ........................................................................................................ 4 1.7 ESIA and ESMP Update ............................................................................................... 6 1.8 Structure of updated Kariba ESIA-ESMP ..................................................................... 6 2 Project Description ............................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Project Background and Location ................................................................................. 7 2.2 Plunge Pool and Spillway Rehabilitation ...................................................................... 9 2.3 KDRP Components ..................................................................................................... 10 2.4 Project Land, Materials and Labour Requirements ..................................................... 20 2.5 Schedule and Costs ...................................................................................................... 21 2.6 Area of Influence ......................................................................................................... 22 3 Project Rationale ............................................................................................................. 25 3.1 Avoidance of Catastrophic Dam Failure ..................................................................... 25 3.2 Maintenance of Renewable Generation Capacity ....................................................... 25 4 Policy and Legal Requirements ....................................................................................... 26 4.1 Applicable Legal Requirements for ESIA ................................................................... 26 4.2 Key Applicable Legislation and Permitting Requirements ......................................... 27 4.3 International regulations and treaties ........................................................................... 46 4.4 Zambezi River Authority (ZRA) Mission, Vision, Values and Policy ........................ 46 4.5 Mandatory Environmental and Social Safeguards Policies ........................................ 47 5 Assessment of Alternatives ............................................................................................. 55 5.1 No Project Alternative ................................................................................................. 55 5.2 Reservoir Management Alternatives ........................................................................... 55 5.3 Plunge Pool Cofferdam Alternatives ........................................................................... 57 5.4 Slipway Site Alternatives ............................................................................................ 58 5.5 Waste Rock Dump Site Alternatives ........................................................................... 59 5.6 Alternatives Blasting Technologies Considered .......................................................... 61 6 Public Participation and Consultation ............................................................................. 62 6.1 Public Participation Process ........................................................................................ 62 6.2 Issues and Concerns Raised ......................................................................................... 68 6.3 ESIA Disclosure .......................................................................................................... 70 Zambezi River Authority i Kariba Dam Rehabilitation Project (KDRP) 6.4 Ongoing Consultation During Construction To-date .................................................. 72 6.5 Disclosure of the Updated ESIA and ESMP ............................................................... 72 7 Baseline Information ....................................................................................................... 73 7.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 73 7.2 Physical Environment .................................................................................................. 74 7.3 Biological Environment ............................................................................................... 80 7.4 Social Characteristics ............................................................................................... 106 8 Impact Assessment and Mitigation ............................................................................... 114 8.1 Impact Assessment Methodology .............................................................................. 114 8.2 Impacts on the Physical Environment ....................................................................... 117 8.3 Impacts on the Biological Environment .................................................................... 125 8.4 Impacts on the Social Environment ........................................................................... 130 Source: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus:accessed on 11/08/2020 . ................... 133 8.5 Summary of Impacts and Residual Impacts .............................................................. 149 8.6 Impacts of Associated Facilities ................................................................................ 150 8.7 Cumulative Impacts ................................................................................................... 153 9 Environmental and Social Management Plan ................................................................ 156 9.1 Scope and Objectives of the ESMP ........................................................................... 156 9.2 ESMP Organizational Structure ................................................................................ 156 9.3 .................................................................................................. 168 9.4 ZRA Plans ................................................................................................................. 215 10 Monitoring ................................................................................................................. 223 10.1 ............................................................................................ 223 10.2 ZRA Monitoring ........................................................................................................ 224 11 ESMP Implementation Schedule and Budget ........................................................... 239 11.1 Implementation Schedule .......................................................................................... 239 11.2 Budget ....................................................................................................................... 239 12 Conclusion ................................................................................................................. 242 13 References ................................................................................................................. 243 14 Appendix A Administrative and Legal Framework of Zambia and Zimmbabwe .. 250 14.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 250 14.2 Zambian Institutional Framework ............................................................................. 251 14.3 Zambian Environmental and Social Laws and Regulations ...................................... 256 14.4 Zambian Development Policies ................................................................................. 265 14.5 International Treaties, Conventions and Protocols .................................................... 266 14.6 Zimbabwean Institutional Framework....................................................................... 268 Zambezi River Authority ii Kariba Dam Rehabilitation Project (KDRP) 14.7 Zimbabwean Environmental and Social Laws and Regulations ............................... 272 14.8 Zimbabwean Development Policies .......................................................................... 284 15 Appendix B Consultation Materials and evidence of meetings. ............................. 286 16 Appendix C IBAT Proximity Report ..................................................................... 287 17 Appendix D - General Requirements .......................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Chapter One Introduction
    CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Overview The lubricant sub-sector of the downstream industry is one with so many potential that is capable of being a major source of revenue earner for the country, and has grown over the years with increase in the number of second hand passenger and commercial vehicles in the country calling for more frequent lubricant changes. Though Nigeria has an installed lubricant capacity of 600, 000 metric tonnes the current demand is 700 million litres which is about 1% of global demand. The lubricants market is driven by various steps being taken by government such as initiatives to increase the ease of doing business to boost manufacturing sector activities and the Nigeria Economic Recovery and Growth Plan (ERGP) to emphasize investment in infrastructure. With the increase of import duty on finished lubricants to 30% and the recent 7.5 percent VAT on finished lubes in the country, the sectors have been opened up for further investment and the proposed project considered in this study is set to explore the given opportunity. Though there are presently 34 lube blending plants in Nigeria, only two of these (5.9%) are located in the south- south region of the country (DPR, 2020). This proposed lubricating oil blending plant project by Eraskon Nigeria Ltd is thus a private effort to support the government of Nigeria on how local production of lubricant can be increased to boost its domestic availability especially in the south-south region of the country. 1.2 Project Proponent Eraskon Nigeria Limited is a lubricant oil manufacturing company incorporated in Nigeria by the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) with RC No.
    [Show full text]
  • §4-71-6.5 LIST of CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF CONDITIONALLY APPROVED ANIMALS November 28, 2006 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Plesiopora FAMILY Tubificidae Tubifex (all species in genus) worm, tubifex PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Crustacea ORDER Anostraca FAMILY Artemiidae Artemia (all species in genus) shrimp, brine ORDER Cladocera FAMILY Daphnidae Daphnia (all species in genus) flea, water ORDER Decapoda FAMILY Atelecyclidae Erimacrus isenbeckii crab, horsehair FAMILY Cancridae Cancer antennarius crab, California rock Cancer anthonyi crab, yellowstone Cancer borealis crab, Jonah Cancer magister crab, dungeness Cancer productus crab, rock (red) FAMILY Geryonidae Geryon affinis crab, golden FAMILY Lithodidae Paralithodes camtschatica crab, Alaskan king FAMILY Majidae Chionocetes bairdi crab, snow Chionocetes opilio crab, snow 1 CONDITIONAL ANIMAL LIST §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Chionocetes tanneri crab, snow FAMILY Nephropidae Homarus (all species in genus) lobster, true FAMILY Palaemonidae Macrobrachium lar shrimp, freshwater Macrobrachium rosenbergi prawn, giant long-legged FAMILY Palinuridae Jasus (all species in genus) crayfish, saltwater; lobster Panulirus argus lobster, Atlantic spiny Panulirus longipes femoristriga crayfish, saltwater Panulirus pencillatus lobster, spiny FAMILY Portunidae Callinectes sapidus crab, blue Scylla serrata crab, Samoan; serrate, swimming FAMILY Raninidae Ranina ranina crab, spanner; red frog, Hawaiian CLASS Insecta ORDER Coleoptera FAMILY Tenebrionidae Tenebrio molitor mealworm,
    [Show full text]
  • Fish, Various Invertebrates
    Zambezi Basin Wetlands Volume II : Chapters 7 - 11 - Contents i Back to links page CONTENTS VOLUME II Technical Reviews Page CHAPTER 7 : FRESHWATER FISHES .............................. 393 7.1 Introduction .................................................................... 393 7.2 The origin and zoogeography of Zambezian fishes ....... 393 7.3 Ichthyological regions of the Zambezi .......................... 404 7.4 Threats to biodiversity ................................................... 416 7.5 Wetlands of special interest .......................................... 432 7.6 Conservation and future directions ............................... 440 7.7 References ..................................................................... 443 TABLE 7.2: The fishes of the Zambezi River system .............. 449 APPENDIX 7.1 : Zambezi Delta Survey .................................. 461 CHAPTER 8 : FRESHWATER MOLLUSCS ................... 487 8.1 Introduction ................................................................. 487 8.2 Literature review ......................................................... 488 8.3 The Zambezi River basin ............................................ 489 8.4 The Molluscan fauna .................................................. 491 8.5 Biogeography ............................................................... 508 8.6 Biomphalaria, Bulinis and Schistosomiasis ................ 515 8.7 Conservation ................................................................ 516 8.8 Further investigations .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Olive Barb (Systomus Sarana) ERSS
    Olive Barb (Systomus sarana) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, February 2013 Revised, March 2019 Web Version, 9/11/2019 Photo: Dr. Pratap Chandra Das. Licensed under CC-BY-NC. Available: https://www.fishbase.de/photos/UploadedBy.php?autoctr=16479&win=uploaded. (March 2019). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “Asia: Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Nepal, Bangladesh, Bhutan [Talwar and Jhingran 1991] and Sri Lanka [Pethiyagoda 1991]. Reported from Myanmar [Oo 2002] and Thailand [Sidthimunka 1970].” Status in the United States Systomus sarana has not been found in the wild or in trade in the United States. Means of Introductions in the United States Systomus sarana has not been found in the wild in the United States. 1 Remarks From Gupta (2015): “In India it has been reported as endangered while in Bangladesh it has been reported as critically endangered.” 2 Biology and Ecology Taxonomic Hierarchy and Taxonomic Standing From Fricke et al. (2019): “Current status: Valid as Systomus sarana (Hamilton 1822).” From Froese and Pauly (2019b): “Animalia (Kingdom) > Chordata (Phylum) > Vertebrata (Subphylum) > Gnathostomata (Superclass) > […] Actinopterygii (Class) > Cypriniformes (Order) > Cyprinidae (Family) > Barbinae (Subfamily) > Systomus (Genus) > Systomus sarana (Species)” Size, Weight, and Age Range From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “Max length: 42.0 cm TL male/unsexed; [Rahman 1989]; max. published weight: 1,400 g [Rahman 1989]” Environment From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “Freshwater; brackish; benthopelagic; potamodromous [Riede 2004]” Climate/Range From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “Tropical” Distribution Outside the United States Native From Froese and Pauly (2011): “Asia: Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Nepal, Bangladesh, Bhutan [Talwar and Jhingran 1991] and Sri Lanka [Pethiyagoda 1991].
    [Show full text]
  • Jlb Smith Institute of Ichthyology
    ISSN 0075-2088 J.L.B. SMITH INSTITUTE OF ICHTHYOLOGY GRAHAMSTOWN, SOUTH AFRICA SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 56 SCIENTIFIC AND COMMON NAMES OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN FRESHWATER FISHES by Paul H. Skelton November 1993 SERIAL PUBLICATIONS o f THE J.L.B. SMITH INSTITUTE OF ICHTHYOLOGY The Institute publishes original research on the systematics, zoogeography, ecology, biology and conservation of fishes. Manuscripts on ancillary subjects (aquaculture, fishery biology, historical ichthyology and archaeology pertaining to fishes) will be considered subject to the availability of publication funds. Two series are produced at irregular intervals: the Special Publication series and the Ichthyological Bulletin series. Acceptance of manuscripts for publication is subject to the approval of reviewers from outside the Institute. Priority is given to papers by staff of the Institute, but manuscripts from outside the Institute will be considered if they are pertinent to the work of the Institute. Colour illustrations can be printed at the expense of the author. Publications of the Institute are available by subscription or in exchange for publi­ cations of other institutions. Lists of the Institute’s publications are available from the Publications Secretary at the address below. INSTRUCTIONS TO AUTHORS Manuscripts shorter than 30 pages will generally be published in the Special Publications series; longer papers will be considered for the Ichthyological Bulletin series. Please follow the layout and format of a recent Bulletin or Special Publication. Manuscripts must be submitted in duplicate to the Editor, J.L.B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology, Private Bag 1015, Grahamstown 6140, South Africa. The typescript must be double-spaced throughout with 25 mm margins all round.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 7: Species Changing IUCN Red List Status (2018-2019)
    IUCN Red List version 2019-3: Table 7 Last Updated: 10 December 2019 Table 7: Species changing IUCN Red List Status (2018-2019) Published listings of a species' status may change for a variety of reasons (genuine improvement or deterioration in status; new information being available that was not known at the time of the previous assessment; taxonomic changes; corrections to mistakes made in previous assessments, etc. To help Red List users interpret the changes between the Red List updates, a summary of species that have changed category between 2018 (IUCN Red List version 2018-2) and 2019 (IUCN Red List version 2019-3) and the reasons for these changes is provided in the table below. IUCN Red List Categories: EX - Extinct, EW - Extinct in the Wild, CR - Critically Endangered [CR(PE) - Critically Endangered (Possibly Extinct), CR(PEW) - Critically Endangered (Possibly Extinct in the Wild)], EN - Endangered, VU - Vulnerable, LR/cd - Lower Risk/conservation dependent, NT - Near Threatened (includes LR/nt - Lower Risk/near threatened), DD - Data Deficient, LC - Least Concern (includes LR/lc - Lower Risk, least concern). Reasons for change: G - Genuine status change (genuine improvement or deterioration in the species' status); N - Non-genuine status change (i.e., status changes due to new information, improved knowledge of the criteria, incorrect data used previously, taxonomic revision, etc.); E - Previous listing was an Error. IUCN Red List IUCN Red Reason for Red List Scientific name Common name (2018) List (2019) change version Category
    [Show full text]
  • Parasites of Barbus Species (Cyprinidae) of Southern Africa
    Parasites of Barbus species (Cyprinidae) of southern Africa By Pieter Johannes Swanepoel Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Magister Scientiae in the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of the Free State. Supervisor: Prof J.G. van As Co-supervisor: Prof L.L. van As Co-supervisor: Dr K.W. Christison July 2015 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 CYPRINIDAE .......................................................................................................... 6 BARBUS ............................................................................................................... 10 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................... 12 2. Study Sites ................................................................................................ 16 OKAVANGO RIVER SYSTEM .............................................................................. 17 Importance ................................................................................................................... 17 Hydrology .................................................................................................................... 17 Habitat and Vegetation ................................................................................................ 19 Leseding Research Camp...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Proceedings 2006
    FOSAF THE FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN FLYFISHERS PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10 TH YELLOWFISH WORKING GROUP CONFERENCE STERKFONTEIN DAM, HARRISMITH 07 – 09 APRIL 2006 Edited by Peter Arderne PRINTING & DISTRIBUTION SPONSORED BY: sappi 1 CONTENTS Page List of participants 3 Press release 4 Chairman’s address -Bill Mincher 5 The effects of pollution on fish and people – Dr Steve Mitchell 7 DWAF Quality Status Report – Upper Vaal Management Area 2000 – 2005 - Riana 9 Munnik Water: The full picture of quality management & technology demand – Dries Louw 17 Fish kills in the Vaal: What went wrong? – Francois van Wyk 18 Water Pollution: The viewpoint of Eco-Care Trust – Mornē Viljoen 19 Why the fish kills in the Vaal? –Synthesis of the five preceding presentations 22 – Dr Steve Mitchell The Elands River Yellowfish Conservation Area – George McAllister 23 Status of the yellowfish populations in Limpopo Province – Paul Fouche 25 North West provincial report on the status of the yellowfish species – Daan Buijs & 34 Hermien Roux Status of yellowfish in KZN Province – Rob Karssing 40 Status of the yellowfish populations in the Western Cape – Dean Impson 44 Regional Report: Northern Cape (post meeting)– Ramogale Sekwele 50 Yellowfish conservation in the Free State Province – Pierre de Villiers 63 A bottom-up approach to freshwater conservation in the Orange Vaal River basin – 66 Pierre de Villiers Status of the yellowfish populations in Gauteng Province – Piet Muller 69 Yellowfish research: A reality to face – Dr Wynand Vlok 72 Assessing the distribution & flow requirements of endemic cyprinids in the Olifants- 86 Doring river system - Bruce Paxton Yellowfish genetics projects update – Dr Wynand Vlok on behalf of Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Barotse Floodplain
    Public Disclosure Authorized REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA DETAILED ASSESSMENT, CONCEPTUAL DESIGN AND ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (ESIA) STUDY Public Disclosure Authorized FOR THE IMPROVED USE OF PRIORITY TRADITIONAL CANALS IN THE BAROTSE SUB-BASIN OF THE ZAMBEZI ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT Public Disclosure Authorized ASSESSMENT Final Report October 2014 Public Disclosure Authorized 15 juillet 2004 BRL ingénierie 1105 Av Pierre Mendès-France BP 94001 30001 Nîmes Cedex5 France NIRAS 4128 , Mwinilunga Road, Sunningdale, Zambia Date July 23rd, 2014 Contact Eric Deneut Document title Environmental and Social Impact Assessment for the improved use of priority canals in the Barotse Sub-Basin of the Zambezi Document reference 800568 Code V.3 Date Code Observation Written by Validated by May 2014 V.1 Eric Deneut: ESIA July 2014 V.2 montage, Environmental baseline and impact assessment Charles Kapekele Chileya: Social Eric Verlinden October 2014 V.3 baseline and impact assessment Christophe Nativel: support in social baseline report ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE IMPROVED USE OF PRIORITY TRADITIONAL CANALS IN THE BAROTSE SUB-BASIN OF THE ZAMBEZI Table of content 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 2 1.1 Background of the project 2 1.2 Summary description of the project including project rationale 6 1.2.1 Project rationale 6 1.2.2 Summary description of works 6 1.3 Objectives the project 7 1.3.1 Objectives of the Assignment 8 1.3.2 Objective of the ESIA 8 1.4 Brief description of the location 10 1.5 Particulars of Shareholders/Directors 10 1.6 Percentage of shareholding by each shareholder 10 1.7 The developer’s physical address and the contact person and his/her details 10 1.8 Track Record/Previous Experience of Enterprise Elsewhere 11 1.9 Total Project Cost/Investment 11 1.10 Proposed Project Implementation Date 12 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Snakeskin Barb (Desmopuntius Rhomboocellatus) ERSS
    Snakeskin Barb (Desmopuntius rhomboocellatus) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, February 2013 Revised, March 2019 Web Version, 10/10/2019 Photo: R. A. Collins. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported. Available: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Puntius_rhomboocellatus.jpg. (March 2019). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Froese and Pauly (2019a): “Asia: West and Central Kalimantan in Borneo, Indonesia.” From Seriously Fish (2019): “Endemic to southern Kalimantan, the Indonesian portion of Borneo where it’s been recorded from several river systems including the Kapuas, Kepayang, Barito and Kahajan Type locality is ‘Canal along the highway from Oelin to Bandjermasin, about 15 kilometers from Bandjermasin, Borneo.” 1 Status in the United States There are no records of Desmopuntius rhomboocellatus in the wild in the United States. D. rhomboocellaus is in trade in the United States. From Aquatic Arts (2019): “Snakeskin aka Rhombo Aka Orange Buffalo Barb (Desmopuntius rhomboocellatus) Sold Out” Means of Introductions in the United States There are no records of Desmopuntius rhomboocellatus in the wild in the United States. Remarks From Seriously Fish (2019): “D. rhomboocellatus is included in a group of closely-related, similar-looking fishes which were moved into the new genus Desmopuntius by Kottelat (2013). They were formerly included in the Puntius assemblage which was for a number of years viewed as a polyphyletic catch-all containing over 100 species of small to mid-sized cyprinid [sic] until Pethiyagoda et al. (2012) published a partial review covering South Asian members.” The valid name Desmopuntius rhomboocellatus and the synonym Puntius rhomboocellatus (Fricke et al.
    [Show full text]
  • HERPETOFAUNA of the CUBANGO-OKOVANGO RIVER CATCHMENT a Report on a Rapid Biodiversity Survey Conducted in May 2012
    HERPETOFAUNA OF THE CUBANGO-OKOVANGO RIVER CATCHMENT A report on a rapid biodiversity survey conducted in May 2012 Prepared by Werner Conradie (M. Env. Sc)* Museum Natural Scientist - Herpetologist Port Elizabeth Museum (Bayworld) P.O.Box 13147 Humewood Port Elizabeth 6013 Tel: +27 (41) 5840 650 Fax: +27 (41) 5840 661 E-mail: [email protected] * Werner Conradie has a Masters in Environmental Science (M.Env.Sc), specialising in Herpetology and Zoology in general with 8 years experience. Contents 1. Background ..................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Study area ....................................................................................................................................... 2 3. Methods .......................................................................................................................................... 3 4. Amphibian and reptile Species lists ................................................................................................ 3 5. Results ............................................................................................................................................. 7 5.1 Cubango River Basin .............................................................................................................. 7 5.2 Cuito River Basin .................................................................................................................... 8 5.3 Important Discoveries ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (Eflows) Assessments for the Western Indian Ocean (WIO) Region
    Guidelines on Environmental Flows (EFlows) Assessments for the Western Indian Ocean (WIO) region i Check that this page complies with most recent approved UNEP format Published by the United Nations Environment Programme/Nairobi Convention Secretariat. Copyright © Nairobi Convention 2019. All rights reserved: The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Contracting Parties to the Nairobi Convention. Rights and Permissions: The information in this report is copyrighted, therefore, copying and/or transmitting portions of this report without permission of the Nairobi Convention may be a violation of applicable law. However, the Nairobi Convention encourages dissemination and use of the materials in this report. Disclaimer: This publication has been produced with the kind assistance of the various governments, United Nations Agencies, Non-Governmental Organizations, Civil Society Organizations, as well as of individuals with financial support from the Global Environment Facility (GEF). However, the report is copyrighted entirely to the Nairobi Convention. Compiled and prepared by: Cate Brown and Jackie King, with contributions from Lara Van Niekerk and Susan Taljaard. Citation: UNEP-Nairobi Convention/WIOMSA (2019). Guidelines on Environmental Flows (EFlows) Assessments for the Western Indian Ocean (WIO) region. UNEP, Nairobi, XXXpp. ISBN: XXXX ii Table of Contents 1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]