DOCSLIB.ORG

(Eflows) Assessments for the Western Indian Ocean (WIO) Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(Eflows) Assessments for the Western Indian Ocean (WIO) Region Guidelines on Environmental Flows (EFlows) Assessments for the Western Indian Ocean (WIO) region i Check that this page complies with most recent approved UNEP format Published by the United Nations Environment Programme/Nairobi Convention Secretariat. Copyright © Nairobi Convention 2019. All rights reserved: The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Contracting Parties to the Nairobi Convention. Rights and Permissions: The information in this report is copyrighted, therefore, copying and/or transmitting portions of this report without permission of the Nairobi Convention may be a violation of applicable law. However, the Nairobi Convention encourages dissemination and use of the materials in this report. Disclaimer: This publication has been produced with the kind assistance of the various governments, United Nations Agencies, Non-Governmental Organizations, Civil Society Organizations, as well as of individuals with financial support from the Global Environment Facility (GEF). However, the report is copyrighted entirely to the Nairobi Convention. Compiled and prepared by: Cate Brown and Jackie King, with contributions from Lara Van Niekerk and Susan Taljaard. Citation: UNEP-Nairobi Convention/WIOMSA (2019). Guidelines on Environmental Flows (EFlows) Assessments for the Western Indian Ocean (WIO) region. UNEP, Nairobi, XXXpp. ISBN: XXXX ii Table of Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Rationale, mandate and process followed in the development of the guidelines .......................... 1 1.2 Structure of the guidelines ................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Definitions............................................................................................................................................ 3 2 Environmental Flows .................................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 The need for EFlows ............................................................................................................................ 5 2.2 The effects of human developments on rivers and estuaries .......................................................... 6 2.3 Climate change and EFlows ................................................................................................................ 8 2.4 Negotiating objectives for river and estuarine ecosystem status .................................................... 9 2.5 An integrated river basin management approach .......................................................................... 10 3 EFlows Assessments ................................................................................................................................. 12 3.1 EFlows Assessment methods ............................................................................................................ 12 3.2 Trends in EFlows Assessments in the WIO region ........................................................................... 19 3.3 Information provided by EFlows Assessments ................................................................................ 21 3.3.1 EFlows information to support the sustainability of marine ecosystems .............................. 23 4 Undertaking an EFlows Assessment ........................................................................................................ 26 4.1 Nature of the assessment, budget, method and team ................................................................... 26 4.1.1 Purpose and scope .................................................................................................................... 26 4.1.2 Budget ....................................................................................................................................... 27 4.2 Select an appropriate EFlows Assessment method ........................................................................ 29 4.2.1 Supporting models .................................................................................................................... 31 4.2.2 Consideration for the selection of methods for WIO EFlows Assessments........................... 31 4.3 EFlows Assessment team .................................................................................................................. 32 4.4 Spatial and temporal units of assessment ....................................................................................... 34 4.4.1 Site selection ............................................................................................................................. 34 4.4.2 Time-scales for analysis ............................................................................................................ 35 4.4.3 Baseline conditions ................................................................................................................... 37 iii 4.5 Stakeholder engagement .................................................................................................................. 37 4.6 Scenarios ............................................................................................................................................ 39 4.7 Biophysical and social indicators ...................................................................................................... 40 4.7.1 Mapping indicator links ............................................................................................................ 41 4.8 Data requirements ............................................................................................................................ 42 4.8.1 Physical/chemical ...................................................................................................................... 46 4.8.2 Biology ....................................................................................................................................... 48 4.8.3 Social .......................................................................................................................................... 48 4.9 Field visits .......................................................................................................................................... 49 4.10 Set-up and calibrate EFlows models ................................................................................................ 49 4.11 Analyse the scenarios........................................................................................................................ 50 4.12 Reporting ........................................................................................................................................... 52 4.12.1 Other deliverables .................................................................................................................... 52 5 Managing data limitations ........................................................................................................................ 54 6 Mainstreaming the uptake of EFlows Assessments ................................................................................ 56 6.1 Deciding on EFlows allocations ........................................................................................................ 56 6.2 Harmonizing policies and working with government agencies ...................................................... 57 6.3 Building managerial and technical capacity in E-Flows Assessment .............................................. 58 6.4 E-Flows information systems ............................................................................................................ 59 6.5 Funding to support EFlows ............................................................................................................... 60 7 References................................................................................................................................................. 62 iv List of Tables Table 3.1 Commonly-used EFlows Assessment methods for rivers .......................................................... 15 Table 3.2 Commonly-used EFlows Assessment methods for estuaries ..................................................... 16 Table 3.3 Actions required for including the nearshore marine environment into an EFlows Assessments ....................................................................................................................................................... 18 Table 3.4 Definitions of the ecological condition categories ..................................................................... 22 Table 3.5 Strengths and weakness of categories of EFlows Assessment methods................................... 24 Table 4.1 Personnel time (days) for different resolution levels of flow assessments per river , excluding travel and stakeholder liaison time, and disbursements. These are estimates only. ............... 28 Table 4.2 Personnel time (days) for different resolution levels of flow assessments per estuary, excluding travel and stakeholder liaison time, and disbursements. These are estimates only. ............... 28 Table 4.3 Decision matrix for selection of a suitable EFlows Assessment method................................... 30 Table 4.4 Potential members of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter One Introduction
    CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Overview The lubricant sub-sector of the downstream industry is one with so many potential that is capable of being a major source of revenue earner for the country, and has grown over the years with increase in the number of second hand passenger and commercial vehicles in the country calling for more frequent lubricant changes. Though Nigeria has an installed lubricant capacity of 600, 000 metric tonnes the current demand is 700 million litres which is about 1% of global demand. The lubricants market is driven by various steps being taken by government such as initiatives to increase the ease of doing business to boost manufacturing sector activities and the Nigeria Economic Recovery and Growth Plan (ERGP) to emphasize investment in infrastructure. With the increase of import duty on finished lubricants to 30% and the recent 7.5 percent VAT on finished lubes in the country, the sectors have been opened up for further investment and the proposed project considered in this study is set to explore the given opportunity. Though there are presently 34 lube blending plants in Nigeria, only two of these (5.9%) are located in the south- south region of the country (DPR, 2020). This proposed lubricating oil blending plant project by Eraskon Nigeria Ltd is thus a private effort to support the government of Nigeria on how local production of lubricant can be increased to boost its domestic availability especially in the south-south region of the country. 1.2 Project Proponent Eraskon Nigeria Limited is a lubricant oil manufacturing company incorporated in Nigeria by the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) with RC No.
    [Show full text]
  • The Israeli Journal of Aquaculture - Bamidgeh, IIC:63.2011.539, 8 Pages
    The Israeli Journal of Aquaculture - Bamidgeh, IIC:63.2011.539, 8 pages The IJA appears exclusively as a peer- reviewed on -line Open Access journal at http://www.siamb.org.il Sale of IJA papers is strictly forbidden. Effect of Three Diets on Growth and Survival Rates of African Catfish Heterobranchus bidorsalis Larvae Yao Laurent Alla1*, Ble Melecony Célestin1, Atse Boua Célestin1, Kone Tidiani2 1 Centre de Recherches Océanologiques, BPV 18 Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire 2 Laboratoire d’Hydrobiologie, UFR Biosciences, Université de Cocody Abidjan, 22 BP 582 Abidjan 22, Côte d’Ivoire (Received 23.2.10, Accepted 14.4.10) Key words: Heterobranchus bidorsalis, growth, survival, Artemia salina, beef brain, formulated food Abstract Investigations are underway in the Centre de Recherches Océanologiques d’Abidjan (Côte d’Ivoire) to find whether the catfish (Heterobranchus bidorsalis) could be an interesting aquaculture species. Within this framework a 28-day aquarium culture feeding trial was conducted to investigate the effects of three diets (Artemia salina nauplii, beef brain enriched with vitamins, and a compound food) on the growth and survival rates in 2-day post hatch H. bidorsalis. The feeding experiments started after the yolk sac of the larvae was absorbed (initial mean weight = 2.03±0.38 mg). Larvae fed Artemia nauplii had a higher growth rate (final mean weight = 708.60±411.61 mg] than those fed beef brain (381.81±118.88 mg) or compound food (102.72±48.09 mg). Conversely, the beef brain diet yielded a better survival rate (70.47±9.48%) than the Artemia nauplii (38.72±7.74%) or the compound diet (5.37±2.24%).
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Assessment of Environmental Flows in the Western Indian Ocean Region Guidelines for the Assessment of Eflows in WIO Region
    Western Indian Ocean Ecosystem Guidelines and Toolkits Guidelines for the Assessment of Environmental Flows in the Western Indian Ocean Region Guidelines for the Assessment of EFlows in WIO region Western Indian Ocean Ecosystem Guidelines and Toolkits Guidelines for the Assessment of Environmental Flows in the Western Indian Ocean Region Published by the United Nations Environment Programme/Nairobi Convention Secretariat. Copyright © Nairobi Convention 2020. All rights reserved: The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Contracting Parties to the Nairobi Convention. Rights and Permissions: The information in this report is copyrighted, therefore, copying and/or transmitting portions of this report without permission of the Nairobi Convention may be a violation of applicable law. How- ever, the Nairobi Convention encourages dissemination and use of the materials in this report. Disclaimer: This publication has been produced by the United Nations Environ- ment Programme-Nairobi Convention and WIOMSA with the kind assistance of various regional governments, Non-Governmental Organizations, Civil Society Organizations, as well as of individuals through the Global Environment Facility (GEF) funded WIOSAP pro- ject and SIDA funded MASMA project executed by the Convention and WIOMSA respectively. The report is copyrighted entirely to the Nairobi Convention and WIOMSA. Compiled and prepared by: Cate Brown and Jackie King, with contributions from Lara Van Niekerk and Susan Taljaard. Series Editor: Matthew D. Richmond Designed by: Marco Nunes Correia Coordinated by: Jared Bosire, Julius Francis and Timothy Andrew Citation: UNEP-Nairobi Convention/WIOMSA (2020). Guidelines for the Assessment of Environmental Flows in the Western Indian Ocean Region.
    [Show full text]
  • Heterobranchus Longifilis Valenciennes, 1840 F1 Generation
    Sokoto Journal of Veterinary Sciences, Volume 13 (Number 1), April 2015 RESEARCH ARTICLE Sokoto Journal of Veterinary Sciences (P-ISSN 1595-093X/ E-ISSN 2315-6201) Suleiman et al/Sokoto Journal of Veterinary Sciences (2015) 13(1): 9-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/sokjvs.v13i1.2 Radiographic studies on morphological anomalies in artificially spawned Heterobranchus longifilis Valenciennes, 1840 F1 generation 1 2 3 B Suleiman *, L Maruff & SJ Oniye 1. Fisheries & Biological Sciences, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria 2. Surgery and Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria-Nigeria 3. Zoology & Biological Sciences, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria-Nigeria *Correspondence: Tel.: +2348069675754, E-mail: [email protected] Abstract This study was designed to examine radiographically the morphological anomalies in artificially spawned 24-week- old Heterobranchus longifilis. A total of 22 morphological deformities observed from an F1 population of 4,871 were classified. Based on anatomical positions, most of the anomalies (49.99%) manifested in the bodies as stunted growth with a weight range of 240-358g, standard length (SL) of 18.7-29.1cm and stump body trait with a weight range of 445-810g, SL of 22.9-35.9cm. Anomalies of the vertebral column accounted for 27.27% with a weight range of 410-945g, SL of 27.4-36.8cm. Fin aberrations including agenesis were seen in 22.73% with a weight range of 548-840g, SL of 34.1-39.2cm. Radiographic examination revealed anomalies such as hypoplasia and hyperplasia of fins, supernumeracry and agenesis of fins, fin cleft, and fusion of fins, scoliosis and kyphosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish, Various Invertebrates
    Zambezi Basin Wetlands Volume II : Chapters 7 - 11 - Contents i Back to links page CONTENTS VOLUME II Technical Reviews Page CHAPTER 7 : FRESHWATER FISHES .............................. 393 7.1 Introduction .................................................................... 393 7.2 The origin and zoogeography of Zambezian fishes ....... 393 7.3 Ichthyological regions of the Zambezi .......................... 404 7.4 Threats to biodiversity ................................................... 416 7.5 Wetlands of special interest .......................................... 432 7.6 Conservation and future directions ............................... 440 7.7 References ..................................................................... 443 TABLE 7.2: The fishes of the Zambezi River system .............. 449 APPENDIX 7.1 : Zambezi Delta Survey .................................. 461 CHAPTER 8 : FRESHWATER MOLLUSCS ................... 487 8.1 Introduction ................................................................. 487 8.2 Literature review ......................................................... 488 8.3 The Zambezi River basin ............................................ 489 8.4 The Molluscan fauna .................................................. 491 8.5 Biogeography ............................................................... 508 8.6 Biomphalaria, Bulinis and Schistosomiasis ................ 515 8.7 Conservation ................................................................ 516 8.8 Further investigations .................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance on Environmental Flows
    Guidance on Environmental Flows Integrating E-flow Science with Fluvial Geomorphology to Maintain Ecosystem Services 2019 edition WEATHER CLIMATE WATER CLIMATE WEATHER WMO-No. 1235 Guidance on Environmental Flows Integrating E-flow Science with Fluvial Geomorphology to Maintain Ecosystem Services 2019 edition WMO-No. 1235 EDITORIAL NOTE METEOTERM, the WMO terminology database, may be consulted at http://public.wmo.int/en/ resources/meteoterm. Readers who copy hyperlinks by selecting them in the text should be aware that additional spaces may appear immediately following http://, https://, ftp://, mailto:, and after slashes (/), dashes (-), periods (.) and unbroken sequences of characters (letters and numbers). These spaces should be removed from the pasted URL. The correct URL is displayed when hovering over the link or when clicking on the link and then copying it from the browser. WMO-No. 1235 © World Meteorological Organization, 2019 The right of publication in print, electronic and any other form and in any language is reserved by WMO. Short extracts from WMO publications may be reproduced without authorization, provided that the complete source is clearly indicated. Editorial correspondence and requests to publish, reproduce or translate this publication in part or in whole should be addressed to: Chair, Publications Board World Meteorological Organization (WMO) 7 bis, avenue de la Paix Tel.: +41 (0) 22 730 84 03 P.O. Box 2300 Fax: +41 (0) 22 730 81 17 CH-1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland Email: [email protected] ISBN 978-92-63-11235-4 NOTE The designations employed in WMO publications and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WMO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Flows Overview
    Environmental Flows Overview Sam Sandoval and Sarah Yarnell Center for Watershed Sciences, UC Davis Presentation Outline • What are Environmental Flows? • History of E-flows in CA • E-flows methods • Policy and Implementation in CA • Seminar Schedule Environmental Flows • What do we mean by: “Environmental Flows”? Environmental Flows Ecosystem: community of living organisms and nonliving components that interact as a system • Aquatic • Riparian • Terrestrial Environmental Flows • Aquatic Ecosystem Environmental Flows • Aquatic Ecosystem: Food Chain Environmental Flows • Aquatic Ecosystem: Ecosystem Services Environmental Flows • Riparian Ecosystem Environmental Flows • Riparian Ecosystem Environmental Flows • Riparian Ecosystem Environmental Flows • Riparian Ecosystem Environmental Flows • Riparian Ecosystem: Services Environmental Flows • Riparian Ecosystem: Services Environmental Flows • Aquatic and Riparian Ecosystems Environmental Flows • Terrestrial Ecosystem Environmental Flows • Quantity • Quality • Geomorphology Environmental Flows Flow Regime the variability in its discharge throughout the year due to P, T, ET, and basin characteristics Environmental Flows Quantity ~ Flow regime: • Magnitude • Frequency • Timing • Duration • Rate of Change Hydrologic Classification for California State of California Natural Flow Class (SM) Snowmelt (HSR) High-volume snowmelt and rain (LSR) Low-volume snowmelt and rain (RSG) Rain and seasonal groundwater (WS) Winter Storms (GW) Groundwater (PGR) Perennial groundwater and rain (FER) Flashy, ephemeral
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Values, Flow Related Issues and Objectives for the Upper
    Environmental values, flow related issues and objectives for the Canning River, Western Australia From the Canning Dam to Kent St Weir Department of Water Environmental Water Report Series Report No. EWR5 May 2007 Environmental Water Report No. 5 Canning values and issues report Department of Water 168 St Georges Terrace Perth Western Australia 6000 <www.water.wa.gov.au> Telephone +61 8 6364 7600 Facsimile +61 8 6364 7601 For more information contact: Laurence Radin Water Resource Division, Department of Water PO Box K822 Perth Western Australia 6842 Acknowledgements This report was prepared by: Laurence Radin, Kylie La Spina, Mike Braimbridge and Ben Malseed, Environmental Water Planning. Comments on the early draft by Dr Andrew Storey are greatly appreciated as are contributions made throughout the project by Dr Storey. The assistance and advice provided by Mark Pearcey and others from the Department of Water, Surface Water Hydrology group is also acknowledged and appreciated. ISSN 1833-6582 (pbk.). Printed on recycled paper. May, 2007 Subject of cover photograph Freshwater cobbler (Tandanus bostocki) Department of Water ii Environmental Water Report No. 5 Canning values and issues report Contents Contents......................................................................................................................iii Summary..................................................................................................................... v 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................1
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Risk Patterns of Freshwater Megafauna: a Global Perspective
    Diversity and risk patterns of freshwater megafauna: A global perspective Inaugural-Dissertation to obtain the academic degree Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) in River Science Submitted to the Department of Biology, Chemistry and Pharmacy of Freie Universität Berlin By FENGZHI HE 2019 This thesis work was conducted between October 2015 and April 2019, under the supervision of Dr. Sonja C. Jähnig (Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries), Jun.-Prof. Dr. Christiane Zarfl (Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen), Dr. Alex Henshaw (Queen Mary University of London) and Prof. Dr. Klement Tockner (Freie Universität Berlin and Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries). The work was carried out at Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Germany, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany and Queen Mary University of London, UK. 1st Reviewer: Dr. Sonja C. Jähnig 2nd Reviewer: Prof. Dr. Klement Tockner Date of defense: 27.06. 2019 The SMART Joint Doctorate Programme Research for this thesis was conducted with the support of the Erasmus Mundus Programme, within the framework of the Erasmus Mundus Joint Doctorate (EMJD) SMART (Science for MAnagement of Rivers and their Tidal systems). EMJDs aim to foster cooperation between higher education institutions and academic staff in Europe and third countries with a view to creating centres of excellence and providing a highly skilled 21st century workforce enabled to lead social, cultural and economic developments. All EMJDs involve mandatory mobility between the universities in the consortia and lead to the award of recognised joint, double or multiple degrees. The SMART programme represents a collaboration among the University of Trento, Queen Mary University of London and Freie Universität Berlin.
    [Show full text]
  • Listen to the River
    2 - LESSONS FROM A GLOBAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW SUCCESS STORIES 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Citation: Harwood, A., Johnson, S., Richter, B., Locke, A., Yu, X. and Tickner, D. 2017. We would like to thank the following participants who generously donated their time to participate in Listen to the river: Lessons from a global review of environmental flow success stories, the oral case study interviews and provide written comments on the interview notes and case study WWF-UK, Woking, UK synopses. Their viewpoints and input are fundamental to this report and we are grateful for their time and expertise: Eric Krueger (The Nature Conservancy), Harry Shelley (Savannah River Basin Advisory Council), ABOUT WWF Stan Simpson (United States Army Corps of Engineers), Andy Warner (CDM Smith, formerly The At WWF, we believe that a living planet – from the global climate to local environments – is vital Nature Conservancy), Ian Atkinson (International River Foundation, formerly Nature Foundation not only for wildlife, but also as the source of our food, clean water, health and livelihoods. And as South Australia), Andrew Beal (Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, South a source of inspiration, now and for future generations. So we’re tackling critical environmental Australia), John Foster (Commonwealth Environmental Water Office, Australia), Tom Rooney challenges and striving to build a world with a future where people and nature thrive. (Waterfind Australia and Healthy Rivers Australia), Hilton Taylor (Commonwealth Environmental Water Office, Australia), Jin Chen (Changjiang Water Resources Commission), Hai Wang (China To do this, we’re educating, inspiring, influencing and engaging the public, policy-makers, business Three Gorges Corporation), the Office of Fisheries Law Enforcement for the Yangtze River Basin leaders and influencers.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Tradeoffs Between Environmental Flow Protections and Agricultural Water Security
    RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS River Res. Applic. (2013) Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) DOI: 10.1002/rra.2637 EVALUATING TRADEOFFS BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW PROTECTIONS AND AGRICULTURAL WATER SECURITY T. E. GRANTHAMa*, M. MEZZATESTAb, D. A. NEWBURNc and A. M. MERENLENDERd a Center for Watershed Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, USA b Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington DC, USA c Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA d Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA ABSTRACT River basin managers responsible for water allocation decisions are increasingly required to evaluate tradeoffs between environmental flow protections and human water security. However, the basin-scale effects of environmental flow regulations on water users are not well understood, in part because analyses are complicated by the spatial and temporal variation in water availability, human demands, and ecosystem needs. Here, we examine alternative regional environmental flow policies and their effects on a distributed network of water users in a small (182 km2) river basin in coastal California. We use a hydrologic model to simulate water diversion operations under three policy scenarios and quantify potential impacts to bypass flows for adult migrating salmon and agricultural water storage. The results indicate that there are inherent tradeoffs between environmental flows and agricultural water security, with the most restrictive environmental policy associated with the greatest impacts to water users. Surprisingly, the moderate environmental flow policy had larger impacts to bypass flows than the unregulated management scenario, suggesting that ecological benefits of the moderate policy are small relative to the adverse effects on agricultural water users.
    [Show full text]
  • African Sharptooth Catfish Clarias Gariepinus
    African sharptooth catfish Clarias gariepinus 1 Taxonomy Species: Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) Family: Clariidae Order: Siluriformes Class: Actinopterygii African sharptooth catfish Clarias gariepinus is a typical air-breathing catfish with a scaleless, bony elongated body with long dorsal and anal fins, and a helmet like head (Figure 1). Colour varies dorsally from dark to light brown and is often mottled with shades of olive and grey while the underside is a pale cream to white (Skelton 2001). It can grow very large with a maximum reported length of 170 cm (IGFA 2001) and weight of 60 kg (Robbins et al. 1991). Figure 1. Lateral view of Clarias gariepinus (Source: FAO 2012). The genus Clarias was reviewed in the 1980s, which resulted in several widespread species being synonymized (Clarias capensis of southern Africa, C. mossambicus of central Africa and C. lazera of west and north Africa) under the name Clarias gariepinus (Teugels 1986). 2 Natural distribution and habitat The native range of C. gariepinus covers most of the African continent, with the exception of Maghreb, Upper and Lower Guinea, and the Cape provinces of South Africa (Picker & Griffiths 2011) (Figure 2). According to Skelton (2001) it is probably the most widely distributed fish in Africa. Jubb (1967) describes its natural distribution as occurring as far south as the Orange River system in the west and the Umtamvuna River in the east of South Africa. Page | 1 C. gariepinus is widely tolerant of many different habitats, even the upper reaches of estuaries, but is considered to be a freshwater species. It favours floodplains, slow flowing rivers, lakes and dams (Skelton 2001).
    [Show full text]