Regional Innovation Monitor Plus 2016

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Regional Innovation Monitor Plus 2016 30 May 2016 Regional Innovation Monitor Plus 2016 Regional Innovation Report North Middle Sweden (Production related biotechnology) To the European Commission Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs Directorate-General Directorate F – Innovation and Advanced Manufacturing www.technopolis-group.com Regional Innovation Monitor Plus 2016 Regional Innovation Report North Middle Sweden (Production related biotechnology) technopolis |group| in cooperation with Iryna Kristensen and Nelli Mikkola, Nordregio Table of Contents 1. Advanced Manufacturing: Production related biotechnology 5 1.1 Overview of performance and trends 5 1.2 Business sector perspective 6 1.3 Scientific research potential 7 1.4 Role of intermediary institutions 9 1.5 Developing skills for the future 10 1.6 Major investment projects 11 1.7 International cooperation. 14 1.8 Policy support and delivery mechanisms 15 1.9 Good practice case 18 1.10 Leveraging the existing potential 24 2. Regional Innovation Performance Trends, Governance and Instruments 26 2.1 Recent trends in innovation performance and identified challenges 26 2.2 Institutional framework and set-up 28 2.3 Regional innovation policy mix 28 2.4 Appraisal of regional innovation policies 31 2.5 Policy good practice 33 2.6 Possible future orientations and opportunities 34 Appendix A Bibliography 37 Appendix B Stakeholders consulted 40 Table of Figures Figure 1: Organisational structure ................................................................................. 20 List of Tables Table 1 Regional innovation support measures ............................................................. 29 Regional Innovation Monitor Plus 2016 i PREFACE In the context of the growth and investment package set out in the Investment Plan of the European Commission, the Regional Innovation Monitor Plus (RIM Plus) provides a unique platform for sharing knowledge and know-how on major innovation and industrial policy trends in some 200 regions across the EU28 Member States. Launched in 2010, the Regional Innovation Monitor aimed at supporting sharing of intelligence on innovation policies across EU regions. Building upon the experience gained and results obtained during the period 2010-2012, the RIM Plus 2013-2014 provided practical guidance to regions on how to use the collected information, via a network of regional experts. Since 2014, the RIM Plus has introduced a thematic focus on advanced manufacturing. The RIM Plus 2015-2016 evolved from a general monitoring of innovation policies towards establishing a more thematic focus in selected areas in order to contribute to improving the competitiveness of European regions. Particularly, the RIM Plus aims through its activities and in close cooperation with the regional stakeholders and other relevant initiatives to: • contribute to the development of new and open spaces of collaboration and exchange on advanced manufacturing, each with a clearly defined thematic focus; • play an enabling role in providing evidence-based information on specific themes and bring in outside perspective from other regions; • map out regional practices in support of advanced manufacturing and relevant pilot/demo projects and work towards involving the relevant stakeholders; • provide an easy access and comparative overview of regional innovation policies and relevant actions in the field of advanced manufacturing; • share the lessons learned with the European Commission services to feed into the preparation of future programmes. The main aim of the 30 regional reports is to provide a description and analysis of developments in the area advanced manufacturing with a clearly defined thematic focus and regional innovation policy, taking into account the specific context of the region as well as general trends. All regional innovation reports are produced in a standardised way using a common methodological and conceptual framework, in order to allow for horizontal analysis, with a view to preparing the Final EU Regional Innovation Monitor Plus report. European Commission official responsible for the project is Alberto Licciardello ([email protected]). The present report was prepared by Iryna Kristensen ([email protected]) and Nelli Mikkola (Nelli.Mikkola @nordregio.se). The contents and views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of the regions or Member States of the European Union, or the European Commission. The copyright of the document belongs to the European Commission. Neither the European Commission, nor any person acting on its behalf, may be held responsible for the use to which information contained in this document may be put, or for any errors which, despite careful preparation and checking, may appear. Further information: https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/regional-innovation-monitor Regional Innovation Monitor Plus 2016 1 Executive Summary 1. Advanced Manufacturing: Production Related Biotechnology The NUTS 2 region Northern Middle Sweden (Norra Mellansverige) is a sparsely populated region, with approximately 832,810 inhabitants in 2014, consisting of three independent NUTS 3 regions (län): Värmland, Dalarna and Gävleborg. The regional GDP per capita (2007-2013) was €26,961 million, or about 7.2% of the national total. The region is well endowed with national resources and has traditionally been dominated by capital-intensive export industries – such as pulp and paper, steel and engineering, machinery and transport vehicles – which account for a large share of Swedish exports (about 34%). The value added generated by the manufacturing sector accounted for 16.4% of the regional GDP in 2013. Other important sectors are food processing, ICT and tourism. Global structural changes have resulted in outsourcing, reduced employment and international mergers and acquisitions. The manufacturing sector still constitutes the main source of employment in the region, exhibiting, however, a negative trend. Since 2011, the employment in low- and medium-low-tech manufacturing has declined by 1.4% in the region. In contrast, the share of the regional labour force employed in high-tech and knowledge-intensive sectors has increased from 2% (2011) to 2.8% (2014). The presence of a strong industrial base (i.e. the forest industry) has provided a solid platform for the transition to the forest-based bioeconomy. The new trends in the manufacturing sector of North Middle Sweden include: recycling of biological raw materials, feedstock, biorefining and especially lignin development (a side product of paper production). The University of Karlstad (Värmland) is an important knowledge source and innovation partner for regional industry, and is actively involved in regional innovation and cluster development. • Challenge 1: To increase internationalisation of cooperation structures The aim of the bioeconomy is to ensure sustainable production and use of natural resources. A cross-sectorial and systematic approach, with a basis in the circular economy, is the main focus area. Programmes, project activities and networking initiatives in the bioeconomy sector are needed in a macro-regional context – initiating, catalysing and facilitating activities to realise bioeconomy not just in North Middle Sweden but also in the Nordic Region, the Baltic Sea Region and Europe. • Challenge 2: To incorporate biotechnological skills into vocational education and training Although broad collaboration has been established with academia, the biotechnology cooperation network lacks a clear reference to vocational skills development, which is regarded as a main condition for realising a cross-sectorial and systemic approach to bioeconomy. Sustainable growth of the bioeconomy sector depends on several interlinked factors, of which an important one that still remains to be realised is the supply of vocational specialists trained in subject areas that have been identified by the key stakeholders in the sector. Clear occupational standards need to be developed in North Middle Sweden, followed by the development of industry-relevant qualifications and curricula. The link between the regional labour market and the university and research fields is long established. However, vocational standards and qualifications that respond to the growing demands from a growing bioeconomy industry cluster need to be developed. 2 Regional Innovation Monitor Plus 2016 • Challenge 3: To increase the number of technology-focused intermediate institutions During recent decades, Swedish innovation and technology-transfer institutes have indicated a tendency to concentrate in larger urban areas. The lack of regional representation of these intermediaries leaves sparsely populated regions in a disadvantageous position when it comes to promoting the diffusion of R&D results and the uptake of advanced manufacturing technologies by local industries. This national trend appears to be turning, but the presence and capacity of technology-focused institutes, for instance, in North Middle Sweden remains insufficient for realising the full potential of regional innovations. Both the cluster organisations and research institutes have a key role to play as policy mechanisms for driving industrial competitiveness. The low number of technology- focused innovation centres holds back efforts to scale up research and innovation into commercial applications. In order to tackle this issue, dialogue and common effort between the national level and the regions is essential. 2. Regional Innovation
Recommended publications
  • Regional Disparity and Heterogeneous Income Effects of the Euro
    Better out than in? Regional disparity and heterogeneous income effects of the euro Sang-Wook (Stanley) Cho1,∗ School of Economics, UNSW Business School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia Sally Wong2 Economic Analysis Department, Reserve Bank of Australia, Sydney, Australia February 14, 2021 Abstract This paper conducts a counterfactual analysis on the effect of adopting the euro on regional income and disparity within Denmark and Sweden. Using the synthetic control method, we find that Danish regions would have experienced small heterogeneous effects from adopting the euro in terms of GDP per capita, while all Swedish regions are better off without the euro with varying magnitudes. Adopting the euro would have decreased regional income disparity in Denmark, while the effect is ambiguous in Sweden due to greater convergence among non-capital regions but further divergence with Stockholm. The lower disparity observed across Danish regions and non-capital Swedish regions as a result of eurozone membership is primarily driven by losses suffered by high-income regions rather than from gains to low- income regions. These results highlight the cost of foregoing stabilisation tools such as an independent monetary policy and a floating exchange rate regime. For Sweden in particular, macroeconomic stability outweighs the potential efficiency gains from a common currency. JEL classification: Keywords: currency union, euro, synthetic control method, regional income disparity ∗Corresponding author. We would like to thank Glenn Otto, Pratiti Chatterjee, Scott French, Federico Masera and Alan Woodland for their constructive feedback and comments. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and are not necessarily those of the Reserve Bank of Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • DA-15-132A6.Pdf
    Federal Communications Commission DA 12-1334 Appendix D: Community Dataset, IBDR 2015, FCC, DA 15-132 Except where noted below, all data from OECD, see stats.oecd.org Pct of Households with broadband Country Region Code Country Code Region 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2006 AUS Australia 16 28 43 52 62 73 73 77 20695501 AUS Australia AU1 New South Wales 18 28 44 53 61 73 73 75 6816087 AUS Australia AU2 Victoria 18 30 45 51 62 72 72 77 5126540 AUS Australia AU3 Queensland 16 30 44 54 64 74 74 78 4090908 AUS Australia AU4 South Australia 10 20 33 42 54 69 69 75 1567888 AUS Australia AU5 Western Australia 15 30 46 54 64 75 75 79 2059381 AUS Australia AU6 Tasmania 8 17 32 39 49 65 65 72 489951 AUS Australia AU7 Northern Territorry (Nt) 14 25 44 55 64 73 73 79 210627 AUS Australia AU8 Australian Capital Territory (Act) 23 40 58 68 74 83 83 85 334119 AUT Austria 33 46 54 58 64 72 77 80 8254298 AUT Austria AT11 Burgenland 29 57 55 63 67 73 78 279128 AUT Austria AT12 Lower Austria 32 46 52 57 62 74 75 74 1580501 AUT Austria AT13 Vienna 45 55 61 65 68 74 82 83 1652448 AUT Austria AT21 Carinthia 22 37 47 52 57 66 76 75 559277 AUT Austria AT22 Styria 27 42 52 49 63 67 77 81 1200854 AUT Austria AT31 Upper Austria 31 43 54 58 62 73 77 81 1400287 AUT Austria AT32 Salzburg 32 45 54 60 64 73 80 78 524920 AUT Austria AT33 Tyrol 28 43 53 57 64 69 72 83 694253 AUT Austria AT34 Vorarlberg 37 44 53 59 65 79 79 83 362630 BEL Belgium 48 56 60 63 70 74 75 79 10511382 BEL Belgium BE1 Brussels Capital Region 56 57 65 71 75 76 1018804 BEL Belgium
    [Show full text]
  • The Genetic Structure of the Swedish Population
    The Genetic Structure of the Swedish Population Keith Humphreys1, Alexander Grankvist1, Monica Leu1, Per Hall1, Jianjun Liu2, Samuli Ripatti3,4, Karola Rehnstro¨ m5, Leif Groop6, Lars Klareskog7, Bo Ding7, Henrik Gro¨ nberg1, Jianfeng Xu8,9, Nancy L. Pedersen1, Paul Lichtenstein1, Morten Mattingsdal10,11, Ole A. Andreassen10,12, Colm O’Dushlaine13,14, Shaun M. Purcell13,14, Pamela Sklar13,14, Patrick F. Sullivan15, Christina M. Hultman1, Juni Palmgren1,16,17, Patrik K. E. Magnusson1* 1 Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, 2 Human Genetics Laboratory, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, 3 Institute for Molecular Medicine, Finland, FIMM, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, 4 Public Health Genomics Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland, 5 Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, United Kingdom, 6 Department of Clinical Sciences, Diabetes and Endocrinology, Lund University Diabetes Centre, Malmo¨, Sweden, 7 Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, 8 Department of Cancer Biology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America, 9 Center for Cancer Genomics, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America, 10 Institute of Clinical Medicine, Section Psychiatry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, 11 Sørlandet Hospital HF, Kristiansand,
    [Show full text]
  • Regions and Cities at a Glance 2020
    Regions and Cities at a Glance 2020 provides a comprehensive assessment of how regions and cities across the OECD are progressing in a number of aspects connected to economic development, health, well-being and net zero-carbon transition. In the light of the health crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the report analyses outcomes and drivers of social, economic and environmental resilience. Consult the full publication here. OECD REGIONS AND CITIES AT A GLANCE - COUNTRY NOTE SWEDEN A. Resilient regional societies B. Regional economic disparities and trends in productivity C. Well-being in regions D. Industrial transition in regions E. Transitioning to clean energy in regions F. Metropolitan trends in growth and sustainability The data in this note reflect different subnational geographic levels in OECD countries: • Regions are classified on two territorial levels reflecting the administrative organisation of countries: large regions (TL2) and small regions (TL3). Small regions are classified according to their access to metropolitan areas (see https://doi.org/10.1787/b902cc00-en). • Functional urban areas consists of cities – defined as densely populated local units with at least 50 000 inhabitants – and adjacent local units connected to the city (commuting zones) in terms of commuting flows (see https://doi.org/10.1787/d58cb34d-en). Metropolitan areas refer to functional urban areas above 250 000 inhabitants. Regions and Cities at a Glance 2020 Austria country note 2 A. Resilient regional societies Stockholm has the highest potential for remote working A1. Share of jobs amenable to remote working, 2018 Large regions (TL2, map) LUX GBR AUS SWE CHE NLD ISL DNK FRA High (>40%) FIN NOR BEL 3540-50%-40% LTU EST 3030-40%-35% IRL GRC 2520-30%-30% DEU AUT Low (<25%) LVA SVN OECD30 PRT HRV POL ITA USA CZE HUN CAN ESP ROU SVK BGR TUR COL ​ 0 10 20 30 40 50 % The share of jobs amenable to remote working across Swedish regions range from close to 50% in Stockholm to 33% in North Middle Sweden (Figure A1).
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Border Scandinavian Area Case Study
    CIRCTER SPIN-OFF // Cross-border Scandinavian area Case study Final Report // May 2021 This CIRCTER spin-off is conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The ESPON EGTC is the Single Beneficiary of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. The Single Operation within the programme is implemented by the ESPON EGTC and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund, the EU Member States and the Partner States, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. This delivery does not necessarily reflect the opinions of members of the ESPON 2020 Monitoring Committee. Authors Marco Bianchi, Mauro Cordella, Pierre Merger - Tecnalia Research and Innovation, Spain Advisory group Jan Edøy - Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation, Department of Regional Development, Norway Erik Hagen, Bjørn Terje Andersen – Innlandet County Authority, Norway Marjan van Herwijnen - ESPON EGTC Information on ESPON and its projects can be found at www.espon.eu. The website provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. ISBN: 978-2-919795-97-0 © ESPON, 2020 Layout and graphic design by BGRAPHIC, Denmark Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON EGTC in Luxembourg. Contact: [email protected] CIRCTER SPIN-OFF // Cross-border Scandinavian area Case study Final Report // May 2021 CIRCTER SPIN-OFF // Cross-border Scandinavian
    [Show full text]
  • CTF: Service Research Center at Karlstad University – Annual Report
    Annual report 2020 CTF.KAU.SE Vision & Mission CTF’s vision and mission is to contribute to scientific knowledge and development of private and public organizations and the wider society through research on value-creation through service. Redaktör: Linda Fridberg Print & layout: University Printing Office, Karlstad 2021 Contents Highlights ..................................................................................... 4 Director’s report .......................................................................... 6 Key numbers ................................................................................ 7 Chair’s view ................................................................................. 8 Organisation ................................................................................ 9 Funders and partners ................................................................. 9 Selected scientific partners worldwide ................................... 10 Introducing new CTF people .................................................... 12 Research framework and goals ............................................... 13 Publications ............................................................................... 14 New funding and projects ........................................................ 16 Selected research related to Covid-19 .................................... 18 Research highligts and impact stories ................................... 19 Communication and dissemination activities ....................... 24 CTF in Media
    [Show full text]
  • OECD Territorial Grids
    BETTER POLICIES FOR BETTER LIVES DES POLITIQUES MEILLEURES POUR UNE VIE MEILLEURE OECD Territorial grids August 2021 OECD Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs, Regions and Cities Contact: [email protected] 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Territorial level classification ...................................................................................................................... 3 Map sources ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Map symbols ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Disclaimers .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Australia / Australie ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Austria / Autriche ......................................................................................................................................... 7 Belgium / Belgique ...................................................................................................................................... 9 Canada ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Strategy for Climate Change Adaptation
    Description of the Government Bill 2017/18:163 National Strategy for Climate Change Adaptation The main content of the bill The bill proposes two changes to the Planning and Building Act (2010:900) with the aim of improving municipalities’ preparedness for climate change. One of these changes involves a requirement for municipalities to provide their views in their structure plans on the risk of damage to the built environment as a result of climate-related flooding, landslides and erosion, and on how such risks can be reduced or eliminated. The other change involves the municipality being able to decide in a detailed development plan that a site improvement permit is required for ground measures that may reduce the ground’s permeability and that are not being taken to build a street, road or railway that is compatible with the detailed development plan. The Government also reports on a National Strategy for Climate Change Adaptation in order to strengthen climate change adaptation work and the national coordination of this work in the long term. The strategy was announced in the Government’s written communication ‘Kontrollstation för de klimat- och energipolitiska målen till 2020 samt klimatanpassning’ (‘Control station for the 2020 climate and energy policy objectives and climate change adaptation’, Riksdag Communication 2015/16:87). Through the strategy, the Government also meets its obligations in accordance with the Paris Agreement and the EU Strategy on Adaptation to Climate Change, in which a national climate change adaptation strategy is highlighted as a central analytical instrument that is intended to explain and prioritise actions and investments.
    [Show full text]
  • Valfrihet I Arvika Kommun
    Fakulteten för samhälls- och livsvetenskaper Brith Marie Johansson Margaretha Lundberg Eva Nilsson Valfrihet i Arvika kommun En studie av medborgarnas inställning till valfrihet Freedom of choice in Arvika municipality A studie of citizens settings to freedom of choice Masteruppsats Vårterminen 2011 Datum/Termin: 2011-05-13 Handledare: P O Norell Examinator: Alf Sundin Karlstads universitet 651 88 Karlstad Tfn 054-700 10 00 Fax 054-700 14 60 [email protected] www.kau.se Abstract Society is developing into having an increasingly individualistic approach and the freedom of choice has come as a reform to strengthen the individual's opportunities for involvement, influence and power in society. We found it interesting to go into the question and examine how the reform affects the municipality. The politicians in Arvika municipality have decided to exposure for competition the service area within elderly care under The Act on System of Choice in the Public Sector (LOV). Neoliberalism and New Public Management have contributed to that we have gone from a collectivist approach to an increasingly individualistic. We have chosen to describe how the influences of these movements have affected the society and its organization. Democracy is significant because all people have equal dignity and equal rights. The right to influence and to take part in decisions are the important parts of democracy. The purpose of this study is to describe the settings of the residents of Arvika municipality for municipal and private providers within elderly care and if there are any differences in settings between specific groups of age. The research question we ask ourselves is if the residents settings varies between the age groups 35, 50, 65 and 80 years, registered in Arvika municipality.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilot Project on Industrial Transition
    RAPPORT Datum 2018-06-11 Enheten för regional tillväxt Maja Sörensen [email protected] Pilot project on industrial transition Material on Norra Mellansverige used for the peer learning workshops organized by the European Commission and OECD spring 2018 Region Värmland - kommunalförbund Postadress Besöksadress Telefon 054-701 10 00 vx Orgnr 222000-1362 Box 1022 Lagergrens gata 2 Fax 054-701 10 01 Bankgiro 5344-2984 651 15 KARLSTAD E-post [email protected] PlusGiro 437 33 98-9 Webbplats www.regionvarmland.se REGION VÄRMLAND 2018-06-11 2 Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 3 2 Workshop 2: Broadening innovation and innovation diffusion ............ 5 3 Workshop 3: Low carbon energy transition ........................................... 9 4 Workshop 4: Promoting entrepreneurship and mobilising the private sector ............................................................................................................ 16 5 Workshop 5: Inclusive growth ................................................................ 22 REGION VÄRMLAND 2018-06-11 3 1 Introduction In July 2017 the European Commission presented new ways to help regions build resilient economies in new times by going further with the regional smart specialisation strategies. One of the actions initiated was two new pilot projects and Norra Mellansverige was selected to participate in the pilot “Tailored support for the specific challenges on regions facing industrial transition”
    [Show full text]
  • FLOWS Work Package 2 Report the Social Dimension in Flood Management
    • • •••• • 0 0 • FLOWS Work Package 2 Report The Social Dimension in Flood Management Ann Enander, Hallvard Berg, Toby Forbes-Turner, Timm Ruben Geissler, Matthew Hunt, Anja Skiple lbrekk, Alison McErlain, Anders Norrby and Teun Terpstra Report no.: FLOWS WP2 Publisher: Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate Authors: Ann Enander. Swedish National Defence College Hallvard Berg, Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate Toby Forbes-Turner, Lincolnshire County Council, United Kingdom Timm Ruben Geissler. Hamburg University of Technology. Germany Matthew Hunt. Cambridgeshire County Council. United Kingdom Anja Skiple Ibrekk, Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate Alison McErlain, Norfolk County Council, United Kingdom Anders Norrby, Arvika Municipality. Sweden Teun Terpstra. Province of Flevoland/University of Twente, the Netherlands Key words: flood management, perception, communication, retrofitting Subject: The Social Dimension in Flood Management -- FLOWS Work Package 2 REPORT Print: NVE's printing office Number printed: 100 Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate Middelthunsgate 29 P.O.Box 5091, Majorstua N-0301 Oslo Telephone: +47 22 95 95 95 Telefax: +47 22 95 90 00 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.nve.n NVE. June 2006 1 Table of Content Introduction - the Structure of this Report 3 Activities Undertaken - the Social Dimension in Flood Risk Management h Perspectives on FLOWS Perception and Communication Studies 5 Introduction 5 Seven lessons from risk perception research 6 Reflections on the FLOWS
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Central Sweden)
    Version: Final Date: 11 April 2012 Regional Innovation Monitor Regional Innovation Report (Northern Central Sweden) To the European Commission Enterprise and Industry Directorate-General Directorate D – Industrial Innovation and Mobility Industries Maria Lindqvist Nordregio www.technopolis-group.com PREFACE The Regional Innovation Monitor (RIM)1 is an initiative of the European Commission's Directorate General for Enterprise and Industry, which has the objective to describe and analyse innovation policy trends across EU regions. RIM analysis is based on methodologies developed in the context of the INNO-Policy Trendchart, which covers innovation policies at national level as part of the PRO INNO Europe initiative. The overarching objective of this project is to enhance the competitiveness of European regions through increasing the effectiveness of their innovation policies and strategies. The specific objective of the RIM is to enhance the scope and quality of policy assessment by providing policy-makers, other innovation stakeholders with the analytical framework and tools for evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of regional policies and regional innovation systems. RIM covers EU-20 Member States: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. This means that RIM will not concentrate on Member States where the Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics NUTS 1 and 2 levels are identical with the entire country (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania), Malta which only has NUTS 3 regions, Slovenia which has a national innovation policy or Cyprus and Luxembourg which are countries without NUTS regions. The main aim of 50 regional reports is to provide a description and analysis of contemporary developments of regional innovation policy, taking into account the specific context of the region as well as general trends.
    [Show full text]