World Bank Document
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Document of The World Bank Public Disclosure Authorized Report No: ICR0000503 IMPLEMENTATION COMPLETION AND RESULTS REPORT ON A LOAN IN THE AMOUNT OF US$60 MILLION EQUIVALENT Public Disclosure Authorized TO THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION FOR THE MOSCOW URBAN TRANSPORT PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized October 30, 2009 Sustainable Development Department Russia Country Unit Europe and Central Asia Region Public Disclosure Authorized CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (Exchange Rate Effective January 31, 2009) Currency Unit = Ruble Ruble 1.00 = US$0.03 US$1.00 = Ruble 32.6 FISCAL YEAR January 1 – December 31 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS CAS Country Assistance Strategy CCTV Closed Circuit Television ERR Economic Rate of Return GDP Gross Domestic Product GIBDD State Traffic Police IBRD International Bank for Reconstruction and Development ICR Implementation Completion and Results Report INT Department of Institutional Integrity IRIS Integrated Records and Information Services MCG Moscow City Government M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MKAD Moscow Ring Road MPIU Moscow Project Implementation Unit MUTP Moscow Urban Transport Project NGO Non-Governmental Organization OPRC Operations Procurement Review Committee PAD Project Appraisal Document PDO Project Development Objective PIU Project Implementation Unit SEC US Securities and Exchange Commission SIL Specific Investment Loan TCS Traffic Control System TMC Traffic Management Center TM Traffic Management UNDP United Nations Development Program VP Vice-President Vice President: Philippe H. Le Houerou Country Director: Klaus Rohland Sector Manager: Henry Kerali Project Team Leader: Vickram Cuttaree ICR Team Leader: Elena Chesheva ICR Primary Author: Slobodan Mitric THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Moscow Urban Transport Project CONTENTS Data Sheet A. Basic Information B. Key Dates C. Ratings Summary D. Sector and Theme Codes E. Bank Staff F. Results Framework Analysis G. Ratings of Project Performance in ISRs H. Restructuring I. Disbursement Graph 1. Project Context, Development Objectives and Design ............................................... 1 2. Key Factors Affecting Implementation and Outcomes .............................................. 5 3. Assessment of Outcomes .......................................................................................... 11 4. Assessment of Risk to Development Outcome ......................................................... 17 5. Assessment of Bank and Borrower Performance ..................................................... 17 6. Lessons Learned ....................................................................................................... 20 7. Comments on Issues Raised by Borrower/Implementing Agencies/Partners .......... 22 Annex 1. Project Costs and Financing .......................................................................... 23 Annex 2. Outputs by Component ................................................................................. 25 Annex 3. Economic and Financial Analysis ................................................................. 29 Annex 4. Bank Lending and Implementation Support/Supervision Processes ............ 33 Annex 5. Beneficiary Survey Results ........................................................................... 35 Annex 6. Stakeholder Workshop Report and Results ................................................... 36 Annex 7. Summary of Borrower's ICR and/or Comments on Draft ICR ..................... 37 Annex 8. Comments of Co-financiers and Other Partners/Stakeholders ...................... 50 Annex 9. List of Supporting Documents ...................................................................... 51 Annex 10. Monitoring indicators .................................................................................. 52 MAPS IBRD No. 31064 and No.31064R ..................................................................... 59 A. Basic Information Moscow Urban Country: Russian Federation Project Name: Transport Project Project ID: P046061 L/C/TF Number(s): IBRD-45950 ICR Date: 10/31/2009 ICR Type: Core ICR RUSSIAN Lending Instrument: SIL Borrower: FEDERATION Original Total USD 60.0M Disbursed Amount: USD 55.5M Commitment: Revised Amount: USD 55.5M Environmental Category: B Implementing Agencies: Moscow Implementation Unit Foundation Cofinanciers and Other External Partners: B. Key Dates Revised / Actual Process Date Process Original Date Date(s) Concept Review: 03/06/1998 Effectiveness: 09/24/2001 Appraisal: 12/01/1999 Restructuring(s): 11/15/2006 Approval: 02/06/2001 Mid-term Review: 09/01/2004 Closing: 12/31/2005 12/31/2008 C. Ratings Summary C.1 Performance Rating by ICR Outcomes: Satisfactory Risk to Development Outcome: Low or Negligible Bank Performance: Moderately Satisfactory Borrower Performance: Moderately Satisfactory C.2 Detailed Ratings of Bank and Borrower Performance (by ICR) Bank Ratings Borrower Ratings Quality at Entry: Moderately Satisfactory Government: Moderately Satisfactory Implementing Quality of Supervision: Satisfactory Satisfactory Agency/Agencies: Overall Bank Overall Borrower Moderately Satisfactory Moderately Satisfactory Performance: Performance: i C.3 Quality at Entry and Implementation Performance Indicators Implementation QAG Assessments Indicators Rating Performance (if any) Potential Problem Project Quality at Entry No None at any time (Yes/No): (QEA): Problem Project at any Quality of No None time (Yes/No): Supervision (QSA): DO rating before Satisfactory Closing/Inactive status: D. Sector and Theme Codes Original Actual Sector Code (as % of total Bank financing) Roads and highways 26 80 Sub-national government administration 74 20 Theme Code (as % of total Bank financing) Municipal governance and institution building 50 50 Other urban development 50 50 E. Bank Staff Positions At ICR At Approval Vice President: Philippe H. Le Houerou Johannes F. Linn Country Director: Klaus Rohland Julian F. Schweitzer Sector Manager: Henry G. R. Kerali Ricardo A. Halperin Project Team Leader: Vickram Cuttaree Richard C. Podolske ICR Team Leader: Elena Y. Chesheva ICR Primary Author: Slobodan Mitric F. Results Framework Analysis Project Development Objectives (from Project Appraisal Document) The objective of the Project (as stated in the Loan Agreement) was to improve the institutional capacity of the Moscow Government to plan, design, implement, operate and enforce traffic management measures. The specific objectives (as stated in the Project Appraisal Document) were to (a) build up traffic management in the city by creating and strengthening a Traffic Management Center (TMC), (b) invest in selected high priority physical works which demonstrate the value of improved traffic management, (c) strengthen traffic enforcement through ii training and equipment and (d) enhance the planning of surface public transport operations. Revised Project Development Objectives (as approved by original approving authority) PDOs were not revised. (a) PDO Indicator(s) Original Target Formally Actual Value Values (from Revised Achieved at Indicator Baseline Value approval Target Completion or documents) Values Target Years Traffic Management Center (TMC) created and fully staffed with adequate Indicator 1 : numbers and quality of staff. Value No centralized city wide quantitative or traffic management 20 staff minimum n.a. 500 staf Qualitative) structure in place. Date achieved 09/24/2001 09/24/2001 09/24/2001 12/31/2008 TMC was set up well before negotiations. Minimum staff complement of 20 Comments reached before effectiveness, but not fully qualified. At loan closing, staff were (incl. % 600 of which 50 are traffic management professionals. The TMC is fully achievement) operational. Achieved 100% TMC officially granted adequate authority to plan, design, and implement traffic Indicator 2 : management measures. Transfer of TMC given Value authority over jurisdiction over TMC initially granted quantitative or signals to TMC; signals and cooperating role Qualitative) TMC appointed as appointed as lead lead TM agency. TM agency. Date achieved 09/24/2001 09/24/2001 06/23/2005 Comments Two mayoral decrees in 2005 gave full authority to TMC. It is now the lead (incl. % traffic management agency in Moscow designing and implementing traffic achievement) management schemes. Achieved 100%. (b) Intermediate Outcome Indicator(s) Original Target Actual Value Formally Values (from Achieved at Indicator Baseline Value Revised approval Completion or Target Values documents) Target Years Indicator 1 : Improved traffic enforcement. Transfer signal functions to TMC, Value Police manage traffic focus on moving Achieved in (quantitative signals, no focus on law patrols and substance or Qualitative) enforcement. incident management. Date achieved 09/24/2001 09/24/2001 01/31/2007 iii Comments Operationsl plan for dynamic law enforcement agreed and implemented; (incl. % equipment supplied; TMC and Police functions redistributed. Achieved 100%. achievement) G. Ratings of Project Performance in ISRs Actual Date ISR No. DO IP Disbursements Archived (USD millions) 1 06/28/2001 Satisfactory Satisfactory 0.00 2 12/21/2001 Satisfactory Satisfactory 1.51 3 06/28/2002 Satisfactory Satisfactory 3.40 4 12/24/2002 Satisfactory Satisfactory 5.67 5 05/30/2003 Satisfactory Satisfactory 10.38 6 10/31/2003 Satisfactory Satisfactory 14.23 7 03/05/2004 Satisfactory Satisfactory 18.71 8 04/05/2004 Satisfactory Satisfactory 20.22 9 09/10/2004 Satisfactory Satisfactory 24.25 10 10/29/2004 Satisfactory Satisfactory 25.42 11 05/27/2005 Satisfactory Satisfactory