DOCSLIB.ORG

{Q>Ih$ 'Hmam Gt; {D趍nrr>, Nwuo

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
{Q>Ih$ 'Hmam Gt; {D趍nrr>, Nwuo C {Q>iH$ ‘hmamï´> {dÚmnrR>, nwUo ^maVr¶{dÚm nma§JV (E_².E.), (gÌ nÕVr : {Z¶{‘V) narjm : OyZ - 2015 gÌ {Vgao {df¶:- qgYw Am{U BVa Vm‘«nmfmU¶wJrZ g§ñH¥$Vr (13.306) {XZm§H$ : 24 /06/201 5 JwU: 60 doi: g. 10.00 Vo. Xþ. 12 .30 gyMZm :- (1) gd© àíZ A{Zdm`© AmhoV. (2) COdrH$S>rb A§H$ ˶m àíZm§Mo JwU Xe©{dVmV. à.1. gdm©{YH$ `mo½` n`m©` {ZdS>m. (06 ) 1) haßnm g§ñH¥$VrVrb gdm©V ‘moR>r {dhra ------ ¶oWo gmnS>br Amho. A) amIrJT>r ~) ‘moh|OmoXmamo H$) Ymobm{dam S>) bmoWb 2) emoVwJm©B© ho ñWi -------‘Yo Amho. A) JwOamV ~) {~hma H$) A’$Jm{UñVmZ S>) BamU 3) ------ ho {R>H$mU haßnm H$mimVrb ‘rR> CËnmXZmMo H|$Ð åhUyZ AmoiIbo Jobo Amho. A) ’$‘m©Zm ~) nmÐr H$) bmoWb S>) ÛmaH$m 4) ----¶m§Zr BÝÐmbm haßnm g§ñH¥$Vr Zï> H$aUmam Ago åhQ>bo Amho. A) ìhrba ~) ‘me©b H$) bmb S>) dËg 5) ------¶m§Zr bmoWb ¶m {R>H$mUmMo CËIZZ Ho$bo. A) bmb ~) Eg. Ama. amd H$) dËg S>) dgÝV {eÝXo 6) haßnm g§ñH¥$VrVrb gdm©V ‘moR>r X’$Z^y‘r ----- ¶oWo gmnS>br Amho. A) nmÐr ~) haßnm H$) ‘mohoÝOmoXmamo S>) ’$‘m©Zm à. 2. Imbrb àíZm§Mr CÎmao EH$ Vo XmoZ dmŠ`mV {bhm. (H$moUVohr Mma) (08) 1) {N>Ðo Agboë¶m ^m§S>çmMo {d{dY Cn¶moJ gm§Jm. 2) haßnm g§ñH¥$VrMm {dñVma {H$Vr hmoVm Vo {bhm. 3) ìhrba ¶m§À¶m haßnm g§ñH¥$VrÀ¶m A§Vm~ÔbÀ¶m {gÕm§VmMr ‘m{hVr {bhm. 4) CÎma Omod} H$mimMo ‘hÎd gm§Jm. 5) Amhma ¶oWrb Vm‘«nmfmU g§ñH¥$VrÀ¶m Y‘m©Mr ‘m{hVr gm§Jm. 6) Omod} g§ñH¥$VrÀ¶m CJ‘mMr ‘m{hVr gm§Jm. à. 3. Q>rn m {bhm. (H$moU Ë`m hr Mma ) (20) 1) ~am g§ñH¥$Vr Am{U {VÀ¶m {dñVmamMr MMm© H$am. 2) Ymobmdram ¶oWrb Obì¶dñWmnZ 3) gmdiXm g§ñH¥$Vr 4) µH$moQ> {XOr g§ñH¥$VrMr ^m§S>r 5) H$m¶Wm g§ñH¥$Vr 6) haßnm g§ñH¥$VrMr {bnr qgYw Am{U BVa Vm‘«nmfmU¶wJrZ g§ñH¥$Vr (13.306) AD / II 1/2 à. 4. Imbrb àíZm§Mr CÎmao {bhm. (H$moU Vohr XmoZ ) (2 6) 1) haßnm g§ñH¥$VrÀ¶m A§VJ©V Am{U ~mø ì¶mnmamMr MMm© H$am. 2) ‘ܶ ^maVmVrb Vm‘«nmfmU¶wJmMr MMm© H$am. 3) haßnm g§ñH¥$VrMm A§V Am{U ˶mMo n[aUm‘ ¶mMr MMm© H$am. 4) hmH«$m g§ñH¥$Vr Am{U ˶mÀ¶m {dñVmamMr ‘m{hVr Úm. English Translation Instructions : (1) All Questions are compulsory. (2) Figures to the right indicate full marks. (3) In the case of any doubt the Marathi version of the paper shall be held to be authentic and final. Q. 1 Choose the most appropriate option. (06) 1) The biggest well of Harappan period is found at ------------------. a) Rakhigadi b) Mohenjodaro c) Dholavira d) Lothal 2) The site of Shortughai is located in ------------------. a) Gujrat b) Bihar c) Afganistan d) Iran 3) The site of ------------------ is identified as salt manufacturing centre of Harappan period. a) Farmana b) Padri c) Lothal d) Dwaraka 4) -------------- called Indra as a destroyer of Harappan civilization a) Wheeler b) Marshall c) Lal d) Vatsa 5) The site of Lothal was excavated by------------------. a) Lal b) S.R.Rao c) Vatsa d) Vasant Shinde 6) The largest Harappan cemetery has been found at ------------------. a) Padri b) Harappa c) Mohenjodaro d) Farmana Q. 2 Answer the following in short. (Any Four) (08) 1) What are the different uses of perforated pots? 2) What is the extent of the Harappan civilization? 3) What was Mortimer Wheeler’s theory of Harappan decline? 4) What is Importance of Late Jorwe phase? 5) Describe the religion of Ahar Chalcolithic Culture. 6) What is the origin of Jorwe culture? Q. 3 Write short notes on. (Any Four) (20) 1) Discuss Bara culture and its extent 2) Water Management system at Dholavira. 3) Savalda Culture 4) Describe various ceramics of Kot Diji culture 5) Kayatha Culture 6) Harappan Script Q. 4 Answer the following. (Any Two) (26) 1) Discuss Internal and external trade of Harappan civilization. 2) Discuss the Central Indian Chalcolithic. 3) Discuss Harappan decline and the consequences of decline. 4) What is Hakra culture and its extent? __________________ qgYw Am{U BVa Vm‘«nmfmU¶wJrZ g§ñH¥$Vr (13.306) AD / II 2/2 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Decline of Harappan Civilization K.N.DIKSHIT
    The Decline of Harappan Civilization K.N.DIKSHIT EBSTRACT As pointed out by N. G. Majumdar in 1934, a late phase of lndus civilization is illustrated by pottery discovered at the upper levels of Jhukar and Mohenjo-daro. However, it was the excavation at Rangpur which revealed in stratification a general decline in the prosperity of the Harappan culture. The cultural gamut of the nuclear region of the lndus-Sarasvati divide, when compared internally, revealed regional variations conforming to devolutionary tendencies especially in the peripheral region of north and western lndia. A large number of sites, now loosely termed as 'Late Harappan/Post-urban', have been discovered. These sites, which formed the disrupted terminal phases of the culture, lost their status as Harappan. They no doubt yielded distinctive Harappan pottery, antiquities and remnants of some architectural forms, but neither town planning nor any economic and cultural nucleus. The script also disappeared. ln this paper, an attempt is made with the survey of some of these excavated sites and other exploratory field-data noticed in the lndo-Pak subcontinent, to understand the complex issue.of Harappan decline and its legacy. CONTENTS l.INTRODUCTION 2. FIELD DATA A. Punjab i. Ropar ii. Bara iii. Dher Majra iv. Sanghol v. Katpalon vi. Nagar vii. Dadheri viii. Rohira B. Jammu and Kashmir i. Manda C. Haryana i. Mitathal ii. Daulatpur iii. Bhagwanpura iv. Mirzapur v. Karsola vi. Muhammad Nagar D. Delhi i. Bhorgarh 125 ANCiENT INDlA,NEW SERIES,NO.1 E.Western Uttar Pradesh i.Hulas il.Alamgirpur ili.Bargaon iv.Mandi v Arnbkheri v:.Bahadarabad F.Guiarat i.Rangpur †|.Desalpur ili.Dhola宙 ra iv Kanmer v.」 uni Kuran vi.Ratanpura G.Maharashtra i.Daimabad 3.EV:DENCE OF RICE 4.BURIAL PRACTiCES 5.DiSCUSS10N 6.CLASSiFiCAT10N AND CHRONOLOGY 7.DATA FROM PAKISTAN 8.BACTRIA―MARGIANAARCHAEOLOGICAL COMPLEX AND LATE HARAPPANS 9.THE LEGACY 10.CONCLUS10N ・ I.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Book
    EXCAVATIONS AT RAKHIGARHI [1997-98 to 1999-2000] Dr. Amarendra Nath Archaeological Survey of India 1 DR. AMARENDRA NATH RAKHIGARHI EXCAVATION Former Director (Archaeology) ASI Report Writing Unit O/o Superintending Archaeologist ASI, Excavation Branch-II, Purana Qila, New Delhi, 110001 Dear Dr. Tewari, Date: 31.12.2014 Please refer to your D.O. No. 24/1/2014-EE Dated 5th June, 2014 regarding report writing on the excavations at Rakhigarhi. As desired, I am enclosing a draft report on the excavations at Rakhigarhi drawn on the lines of the “Wheeler Committee Report-1965”. The report highlights the facts of excavations, its objective, the site and its environment, site catchment analysis, cultural stratigraphy, structural remains, burials, graffiti, ceramics, terracotta, copper, other finds with two appendices. I am aware of the fact that the report under submission is incomplete in its presentation in terms modern inputs required in an archaeological report. You may be aware of the fact that the ground staff available to this section is too meagre to cope up the work of report writing. The services of only one semiskilled casual labour engaged to this section has been withdrawn vide F. No. 9/66/2014-15/EB-II496 Dated 01.12.2014. The Assistant Archaeologist who is holding the charge antiquities and records of Rakhigarhi is available only when he is free from his office duty in the Branch. The services of a darftsman accorded to this unit are hardly available. Under the circumstances it is requested to restore the services of one semiskilled casual labour earlier attached to this unit and draftsman of the Excavation Branch II Purana Quila so as to enable the unit to function smoothly with limited hands and achieve the target.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Syllabus, AIH & Archaeoalogy, Lucknow University
    Department of Ancient Indian History and Archaeology, University of Lucknow, Lucknow B.A. Part - I Paper I : Political History of Ancient India (from c 600 BC to c 320 AD) Unit I 1. Sources of Ancient Indian history. 2. Political condition of northern India in sixth century BC- Sixteen mahajanapadas and ten republican states. 3. Achaemenian invasion of India. 4. Rise of Magadha-The Bimbisarids and the Saisunaga dynasty. 5. Alexander’s invasion of India and its impact. Unit II 1. The Nanda dynasty 2. The Maurya dynasty-origin, Chandragupta, Bindusara 3. The Maurya dynasty-Asoka: Sources of study, conquest and extent of empire, policy of dhamma. 4. The Maurya dynasty- Successors of Asoka, Mauryan Administration. The causes of the downfall of the dynasty. Unit III 1. The Sunga dynasty. 2. The Kanva dynasty. 3. King Kharavela of Kalinga. 4. The Satavahana dynasty. 1 Unit IV 1. The Indo Greeks. 2. The Saka-Palhavas. 3. The Kushanas. 4. Northern India after the Kushanas. PAPER– II: Social, Economic & Religious Life in Ancient India UNIT- I 1. General survey of the origin and development of Varna and Jati 2. Scheme of the Ashramas 3. Purusharthas UNIT- II 1. Marriage 2. Position of women 3. Salient features of Gurukul system- University of Nalanda UNIT- III 1. Agriculture with special reference to the Vedic Age 2. Ownership of Land 3. Guild Organisation 4. Trade and Commerce with special reference to the 6th century B.C., Saka – Satavahana period and Gupta period UNIT- IV 1. Indus religion 2. Vedic religion 3. Life and teachings of Mahavira 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Civilization
    SARASVATI Civilization Volume 1 Dr. S. Kalyanaraman Babasaheb (Umakanta Keshav) Apte Smarak Samiti Bangalore 2003 1 SARASVATI: Civilization by S. Kalyanaraman Copyright Dr. S. Kalyanaraman Publisher: Baba Saheb (Umakanta Keshav) Apte Smarak Samiti, Bangalore Price: (India) Rs. 500 ; (Other countries) US $50 . Copies can be obtained from: S. Kalyanaraman, 5 Temple Avenue, Srinagar Colony, Chennai, Tamilnadu 600015, India email: [email protected] Tel. + 91 44 22350557; Fax 4996380 Baba Saheb (Umakanta Keshav) Apte Smarak Samiti, Yadava Smriti, 55 First Main Road, Seshadripuram, Bangalore 560020, India Tel. + 91 80 6655238 Bharatiya Itihasa Sankalana Samiti, Annapurna, 528 C Saniwar Peth, Pune 411030 Tel. +91 020 4490939 Library of Congress cataloguing in publication data Kalyanaraman, Srinivasan. Sarasvati/ S. Kalyanaraman Includes bibliographical references and index 1.River Sarasvati. 2. Indian Civilization. 3. R.gveda Printed in India at K. Joshi and Co., 1745/2 Sadashivpeth, Near Bikardas Maruti Temple, Pune 411030, Bharat ISBN 81-901126-1-0 FIRST PUBLISHED: 2003 2 Burial ornaments made of shell and stone disc beads, and turbinella pyrum (sacred conch, s’an:kha) bangle, Tomb Step well, Abaneri MR3T.21, Mehrgarh, Period 1A, ca. 6500 BCE. The nearest source for this shell is Makran coast near Karachi, 500 km. South. [After Fig. 2.10 in Kenoyer, 1998]. 3 About the Author Dr. S. Kalyanaraman has a Ph.D. in Public Administration from the University of the Philippines; his graduate degree from Annamalai University was in Statistics and Economics. His PhD dissertation was on development administration, a comparative study of 6 Asian countries, published as Public Administration in Asia in 2 volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Archaeology 1987-88 a Review
    INDIAN ARCHAEOLOGY 1987-88 —A REVIEW EDITED BY M.C.JOSHI Director General Archaeological Survey of India PUBLISHED BY THE DIRECTOR GENERAL ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA NEW DELHI 1993 Cover : TisseruStupa,Leh,Ladakh Cover layout & design: Raj Nath Kaw 1992 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA GOVERNMENT OF INDIA Price :Rs. 250.00 PRINTED AT BENGAL OFFSET WORKS, 335, KHAJOOR ROAD, KAROL BAGH, NEW DELHI-1 10005. PHONE: 524200,7510455 PREFACE I am happy to place before the scholars the Indian Archaeology 1987-88—A Review not very long after the publication of the previous issue. We are making efforts to bring the publication of the Review up to date; this, however, would depend on timely submission of material by contributors. It has been our experience that, in many cases, several reminders have to be given for sending material to us for inclusion in the Review which results in delay of its publication. I am sure, with the cooperation of different institutions and the State Departments of Archaeology and Museums and my own colleagues in different Branches and Circles of the Survey it would be possible for us to maintain regularity of its publication. The present issue of the Review is more voluminous than the previous ones and thus reflects also increased activities in different fields of archaeology. Out of several excavations reported in this issue, I may mention the work at Banawali, Thanesar, Sanghol, Hampi, Sannathi, Daulatabad, Lalitagiri, Udaigiri, Fatehpur Sikri, Sravasti, Balikeshwar, Chandel, Harsud, etc. by the Survey, at Kuntasi jointly by the Deccan College, Pune, and the Gujarat State Department of Archaeology, at Mangalkot by the University of Calcutta, at Kotasur by the Visvabharati, Maihar by the Allahabad University, Ganeshwar by the Department of Archaeology and Museums, Rajasthan State and at Shikarpur by the Department of Archaeology, Government of Gujarat.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Archaeology 1986-87 a Review
    INDIAN ARCHAEOLOGY 1986-87 —A REVIEW EDITHD BY M.C.JOSHI Director General Archaeological Survey of India ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NEW DELHI 1992 Cover : Banawali excavations. District Hissar, Haryana Top row from left : terracotta addorsed bull : terracotta scaling ; and applique bucranium motif on a vase, all of Harappan period. Bottom : west gale complex with major streets and residential blocks of lower town, Harappan period. Cover layout & design: Raj Nath Kaw 1992 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA GOVERNMENT OF INDIA Price Rs. 220.00 PRINTED AT BENGAL OFFSET WORKS, 335, KHAJOOR ROAD, KAROL BACH, NEW DELHJ-1 10005. PHONE : 524200,7510455 CONTENTS Page I. Explorations and Excavations ...................................... ................................................... ... 1 Andaman and Nicobar Islands, 1; Andhra Pradesh, 7 ; Assam, 22; Bihar, 22; Gujarat, 29; Haryana, 32; Jammu and Kashmir, 36; Karnataka, 38; Kerala,46; MadhyaPradesh,46; Maharashtra, 58; Meghalaya,63; Orissa, 64; Punjab, 69; Rajasthan, 71; Tamil Nadu, 72; Uttar Pradesh, 73; West Bengal, 94. II. Epigraphy ............................................................................................................ 101 Sanskritic and Dravidic inscriptions, 101. Andhra Pradesh, 101; Assam, 105; Goa, 106; Kamataka, 106; Maharashtra, 108; Orissa, 108; Rajasthan, 108; Tamil Nadu, 109; Uttar Pradesh, 110. Arabic and Persian inscriptions. 111. Andhra Pradesh, 111; Delhi, 111; Gujarat, 112; Haryana, 112; Maharashtra, 112;Uitar Pradesh, 114. III. Numismatics
    [Show full text]
  • Puratattva No. 35 (2004-05)
    PURATATTVA NO. 35 (2004-05) CONTENTS Page Editorial (vi) Felicitations to Prof. A.K. Narain (ix) ARTICLES Symbolic Approaches to the Study of Early Agropastoral Communities of Lower Deccan 1 K. Paddayya Pre-Harappan Village Settlements and Early Farming Communities in Northern South Asia 7 (c. 9th – 4th millennia BC) B.R. Mani Harappan Environment as One Variable in the Preponderance of Rhinoceros and Paucity of 21 Horse J. Manuel A Study of Early Harappan Pottery Motifs 27 Anisha Saxena Early Chalcolithic Ceramic Traditions of Gujarat 38 Preeti Panjwani Baror: A New Harappan Site in Ghaggar Valley – A Preliminary Report 50 Urmila Sant, T.J. Baidya, N.G. Nikoshey, N.K. Sinha, S. Nayan, J.K. Tiwari and A. Arif New Light on the Excavation of Harappan Settlement at Bhirrana 60 L.S. Rao, Nandini B. Sahu, Prabash Sahu, Samir Diwan and U.A. Shastry Stylised Terracotta Animal Head with Horns from Bhirrana – Identification and 69 Significance L.S. Rao Dholavira’s Geometry: A Preliminary Study 76 Michel Danino Chronological Assessment of the Bara Culture 85 K.C. Nauriyal Salvaging the Vanishing Harappans in Haryana 94 Tejas Garge Site Catchment Analysis of the Chalcolithic Settlement of Gilund in the Banas Basin 102 Debasri Dasgupta Geoarchaeological Observations of Man Basin in Solarpur District, Maharashtra 111 Sushma G. Deo, Shivaji Kshirsagar, S.N. Rajaguru, S.S. Hampe and P.P. Joglekar 1 Iron Objects from the Iron Age-Early Historic Level at Badmal 118 Pradeep K. Behera and Pranab K. Chattopadhyay Excavation at Kopia 2005: A Preliminary Report 126 A.K. Kanungo and V.S.
    [Show full text]
  • An Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Proto-Historic Settlements In
    An Archaeological Reconnaissance of the Proto‐historic Settlements in Mansa District, Punjab Appu Sharan1, Vikas Pawar1 and Narender Parmar2 1. Department of History, M.D. University, Rohtak – 124001, Haryana (Email: [email protected]) 2. Rajiv Gandhi Government College for Women, Bhiwani, Haryana Received: 05 October 2013; Accepted: 20 October 2013; Revised: 31 October 2013 Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 1 (2013): 500‐514 Abstract: There is a huge disparity between the known archaeological evidences on which we base our hypothesis and the facts that remain to be revealed. This paper discusses recent fieldwork conducted during July‐August 2013 in the Mansa district (Punjab). As a result 34 out of 170 previously identified sites associated with proto‐historic period, were documented. The southern Punjab (Mansa District) is very rich in archaeological potential. An alluvial plain of Sutlej‐Yamuna divide played a very important role in the human history since the remote antiquity. This survey provided to reiterate a number of problems connected with the origin, development and expansion of the early farming cultures in the region and to understand the mechanism of expansion, dispersal and diffusion of cultural traits with their geographical context particularly on Sirhind Cho or Nalla, during and up to the emergence of Iron Age. The main objective of present study is to present a holistic perspective of the proto‐historic people by understanding the region on the basis of material remains collected during the investigation. Apart from several explorations, including the present one, the only site in the study region namely Dhelawan has been excavated which brought to light significant details of the people; besides various new features of proto‐historic culture which were documented through regional survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Bārā Culture: an Overview of Problems and Issues
    International Journal of Research e-ISSN: 2348-6848 p-ISSN: 2348-795X Available at https://edupediapublications.org/journals Volume 05 Issue 12 April 2018 Bārā Culture: An Overview of Problems and Issues Sukhdev Saini Abstract: Bārā culture was a culture that emerged in the eastern region of the Indus Valley Civilization around 2000 BC. It developed in the doab between the Yamunā and Sutlej rivers, this territory corresponds to modern-day Punjab, Haryana and Western Uttar Pradesh in North India. Bārā culture is believed to have initially developed from Pre-Harappan traditions independently, although later on intermingled with the Harappans in locations. In the conventional timeline demarcations of the Indus Valley Tradition, the Bārā culture is usually placed in the Late Harappan period. The Bārān pottery is thickly distributed in the Sutlej and Ghaghara basins. From this hub centre of the culture it has spread on the Sarasvatī and Driśdvatī in Haryana and to the Yamunā-Gangā doab in western Uttar Pradesh. The painted designs of Bārān ware recall the Pre-Harappan designs from north Baluchistan, Bahawalpur, Sind and Ganganagar areas. So, this poses a problem among the archaeologists regarding the origin and expansion of this culture. Bārān ware plausibly is a local version or variable of 'Pre-Indus pottery', perhaps a near cognate of pre-defence Harappan ware which shows many traits with these various contemporary Chalcolithic cultures. In the Chautāng valley Bārān ware is largely comparable to Siswālian ware. Bārā- Siswālian ware is a long-lived ceramic with Early Harappan motifs carrying the entire sequence in Divide. So, it is called Bārā-Siswālian pottery tradition.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploration of Block Saraswati-Nagar (Mustafabad)
    World Wide Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development WWJMRD 2018; 4(1): 369-371 www.wwjmrd.com International Journal Peer Reviewed Journal Exploration of Block Saraswati-Nagar (Mustafabad), Refereed Journal Indexed Journal Yamunanagar, Haryana UGC Approved Journal Impact Factor MJIF: 4.25 e-ISSN: 2454-6615 Manoj Kumar Manoj Kumar Abstract Research Scholar Dept. of Ancient Indian History, Present Research Paper is based on the archeological exploration in Saraswati Nagar Culture & Archaeology (Mustafabad) of Yamunanagar District in Northeastern Haryana. As the consequence of Kurukshetra University explorations work author explored the 20 archaeology sites, including the new discovery Kurukshetra, India and earlier explored sites. On the basis of preliminary examination of data, it seems that these sites belong to the Late Harappan/Bara to the medieval period. Keywords: Archaeological Exploration and Culture Introduction Location Present study area comes under the jurisdiction of block Saraswati Nagar (Mustafabad) of Yamunanagar District. It is one of the five blocks of Yamunanagar district which is situated between 30°14' to 30°12' N and 77° 4' to 77° 9' E in the North-eastern Haryana. This block is bordered by Bilaspur and Sadhoura blocks from the northern side and southern side is enclosed by block Radour and Ladwa. The Eastern boundary coincides with the block Jagadhri while Western boundary of the region is surrounded by Ambala and Kurukshetra districts. Present study area falls under the catchment of the Yamuna River and its tributaries. But in the ancient period river Saraswati and Darishadwati were flowed in this region (Oldham 1893). Ancient Darishadwati River has been identified with the Chautang River by Kar & Ghose (1984).
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Archaeology 1985-86 a Review
    INDIAN ARCHAEOLOGY 1985-86 —A REVIEW EDITED BY JAGAT PATI JOSHI Director General Archaeological Survey of India ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NEW DELHI 1990 Cover : Excavated remains at Sanghol © 1990 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA GOVERNMENT OF INDIA Price: Rs. 150.00 PRINTED AT VAP ENTERPRISES, H-24 GREEN PARK EXTENSION, NEW DELHI-1 10024 © 669606, 656787 PREFACE In the process of clearing the backlog of publications of the Archaeological Survey of India, I am happy to place before the readers and scholars, Indian Archaeology 1985-86— A Review. Like its earlier issues, it incorporates matter on archaeological activities in the country during 1985-86 besides a summary of results of excavations at Hamad Town, Bahrain, where a team of archaeological experts of Archaeological Survey of India carried out excavations at the invitation of Government of Bahrain. The succeeding issues of the Review are also under preparation. However, I would like to add that since 1989 to June 1990, Archaeological Survey of India has been hectically engaged in bringing out besides the present issue of Indian Ar- chaeology 1985-86—A Review, Temples of the Pratihara Period in Central India, Temples of Khajuraho Vol. I & II, Excavations at Surkotada, Epigraphia Indica Vol.41 and Gupta Inscriptions of Bagh Caves. As usual for this issue of Indian Archaeology the matter was received from various sources and I gratefully acknowledge the cooperation of those whose contributions have been utilised here. The delay in the publication of this issue is regretted and I apologise for any inaccuracy which may have crept in sorting out, compiling and editing the material for this issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Archaeology 1980-81 a Review
    INDIAN ARCHAEOLOGY 1980-81 —A REVIEW EDITED BY DEBALA MITTRA Director General Archaeological Survey of India ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NEW DELHI 1983 Cover : rock-paintings, Bhimbetka 1983 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA GOVERNMENT OF INDIA Prices : Rs. 65.00 PRINTED AT NABA MUDRAN PRIVATE LIMITED, CALCUTTA, 700004 PREFACE This is the twenty-eighth issue of the Review containing report on archaeological activities in various fields including certain spheres of interdisciplinary researches. Thanks to the Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmadabad, and the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Bombay, we have now been able to introduce a sub-section on the thermoluminescence dating. I hope these institutions along with the Birbal Sahani Institute of Palaeobotany, Lucknow, will continue to devote their time and attention to the cause of archaeological research in India. It is a matter of great satisfaction that the Deccan College Post-graduate and Research Institute, Pune, has stepped forward for undertaking multidisciplinary archaeological investigations. The manuscript for the Review for 1981-82 will shortly be sent to the press; it is hoped that the issue will be printed off by the end of this year. Much of the time in compilation can be saved if all the contributors follow the pattern systematized in the Review and use the spelling of place-names as given in the maps of Survey of India. Apart from the items relating to the activities of Archaeological Survey which have been supplied by my colleagues in Headquarters, Circles and Branches, the material was received as usual from various State Governments, Universities and other research organizations.
    [Show full text]