Indian Archaeology 1986-87 a Review
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
INDIAN ARCHAEOLOGY 1986-87 —A REVIEW EDITHD BY M.C.JOSHI Director General Archaeological Survey of India ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA GOVERNMENT OF INDIA NEW DELHI 1992 Cover : Banawali excavations. District Hissar, Haryana Top row from left : terracotta addorsed bull : terracotta scaling ; and applique bucranium motif on a vase, all of Harappan period. Bottom : west gale complex with major streets and residential blocks of lower town, Harappan period. Cover layout & design: Raj Nath Kaw 1992 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF INDIA GOVERNMENT OF INDIA Price Rs. 220.00 PRINTED AT BENGAL OFFSET WORKS, 335, KHAJOOR ROAD, KAROL BACH, NEW DELHJ-1 10005. PHONE : 524200,7510455 CONTENTS Page I. Explorations and Excavations ...................................... ................................................... ... 1 Andaman and Nicobar Islands, 1; Andhra Pradesh, 7 ; Assam, 22; Bihar, 22; Gujarat, 29; Haryana, 32; Jammu and Kashmir, 36; Karnataka, 38; Kerala,46; MadhyaPradesh,46; Maharashtra, 58; Meghalaya,63; Orissa, 64; Punjab, 69; Rajasthan, 71; Tamil Nadu, 72; Uttar Pradesh, 73; West Bengal, 94. II. Epigraphy ............................................................................................................ 101 Sanskritic and Dravidic inscriptions, 101. Andhra Pradesh, 101; Assam, 105; Goa, 106; Kamataka, 106; Maharashtra, 108; Orissa, 108; Rajasthan, 108; Tamil Nadu, 109; Uttar Pradesh, 110. Arabic and Persian inscriptions. 111. Andhra Pradesh, 111; Delhi, 111; Gujarat, 112; Haryana, 112; Maharashtra, 112;Uitar Pradesh, 114. III. Numismatics and Treasure trove ............................................................................. ............................ 116 Andhra Pradesh, 116; Maharashtra, 116; Rajasthan, 116; Uttar Pradesh, 116. IV. Other Important Discoveries ............................................................. : ........................................ 117 Andhra Pradesh, 117; Gujarat, 117; Jammu and Kashmir, 118; Karnataka, 118; Madhya Pradesh, 118; Maharashtra, 120; Pondicherry, 121; Rajasthan, 121; Tamil Nadu, 122; Uttar Pradesh, 122; West Bengal. 123. V. Radiocarbon Dates ............................................................................................................ 124 Andaman and Nicobar Islands, 124; Andhra Pradesh, 124; Gujarat, 125; Haryana, 126; Jammu and Kashmir, 126; Kamataka, 126; Manipur, 127; Uttar Pradesh, 127; West Bengal, 127. VI. Palacobotanical and Pollen Analytical Investigations .......................................................................... 129 Bihar, 129; Maharashtra, 129; Punjab, 130; Uttar Pradesh, 131. VII. Museums ................................................................................................................................... 133 VIII. Architectural Survey ......................................................................................................................... 137 Temple Survey, 137; Building Survey, 138. IX. Preservation of monuments ............................................................................................................ 141 Monuments of National Importance, 141. Agra Circle, 141; Aurangabad Circle, 143; Bhopal Circle, 144; Bhubaneshwar Circle, 148; Calcutta Circle, 150; Chandigarh Circle, 152; Delhi Circle, 153; Guwahati Circle, 155; Hyderabad Circle, 157; Jaipur Circle, 159; Madras Circle, 160; Mini Circle, Goa, 165; Mini Circle, Shimla, 166; Patna Circle, 166; Srinagar Circle, 167; Vadodara Circle, 169 Monuments maintained by the States, 172. Andhra Pradesh, 172; Assam, 172;MadhyaPradesh, 172;Manipur, 173;Nagaland, 173;Rajasthan, l /4; West Bengal, 174. X. Expeditions outside India ........................................................................................................... 175 Investigations of pre-Islamic remains in Maldives, 175; Preservation of Angkor Vat Temple, Siemreap, Cambodia, 177. XI. Archaeological Chemistry ........................................................................................................... 179 Treatment of Monuments and Paintings, 179. Andhra Pradesh, 179; Assam, 179; Bihar, 179; Daman and Diu, 180; Goa, 180; Gujarat, 180; Haryana, 180; Himachal Pradesh, 180; Jammu and Kashmir, 181; Kamataka, 181; Kerala, 182; Maharashtra, 182;Nagaland, 183;Orissa, 183; Rajasthan, 184; Uttar Pradesh, 184; West Bengal, 185. Treatment of excavated objects and museum exhibits, 186. Analysis and Research, 187. Page XII. Archaeological Gardens ........................................................................................................... 190 Andhra Pradesh, 190; Bihar, 190; Delhi, 190; Gujarat, 191; Himachal Pradesh. 191; Jammu and Kashmir, 191; Kamataka, 191; Madhya Pradesh, 191; Maharashtra. 192; Orissa. 192; Punjab, 192; Rajasthan, 192; Tamil Nadu. 193; Uttar Pradesh. 193. XIII. Publications ........................................................................................................... 194 Publications of the Survey, 194. Other publications, 194. PREFACE The present issue of Indian Archaeology—A Review is being brought out after some delay due to factors beyond our control. Apart from the material on different aspects of archaeology in the country, it also includes information on investigations of the pre-Islamic remains in the Maldives and conservation of Angkor Vat temple in Cambodia undertaken by two separate teams of the Archaeological Survey of India. I am sure, the readers will find in these pages useful material which has been contributed by various Branches and Circles of the Survey, State Departments, Universities and other agencies. While the contributors are responsible for the accuracy of the information supplied, I take the responsibility for the omissions, if any, and other shortcomings. I am thankful to all the contributors besides my colleagues whose efforts have helped in bringing out the present issue. I express my grateful thanks to all of them particularly Sarvashri K.V. Ramesh, K.N. Dikshit, B.M. Pande, C. Dorje, J.C. Gupta, K.P. Padhy, A. Jha, Smt. S. Pramanik and Kumari Arundhati Banerji. New Delhi M.C. JOSHI 16 October 1992 INDIAN ARCHAEOLOGY 1986-87 — A REVIEW I. EXPLORATIONS AND EXCAVATIONS ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR ISLANDS 1. EXCAVATION AT MITHAKHARI V, SOUTH ANDAMAN.—In continuation of last year's (Indian Archaeology 1985-86 — A Review, p.1)1 work in the Andaman Islands, the Prehistory Branch of the Archaeological Survey of India2 under the guidance of B.P. Bopardikar, assisted by S.B. Ota, N.G. Nikosey, A.J. Nambiraju, R.K. Dwivedi, N.K. Nimje, P.S. Pashine and T.B. Thapa undertook a trial dig at a locality named Mithakhari V (which was referred to as Hathi Top earlier) in the &administrative village boundary of Mithakhari. The main objective of the digging was to ascertain the undisturbed cultural horizon for some earlier occupation, if any, at the locality apart from the known cultural phase of shell-midden sites in South Andaman and to understand the relationship between sites through comparison between sites within one microecozone (i.e. Mithakhari valley), in terms of the cultural material. The site is located in the Mithakhari valley floor which is below the contour height of 20 m. The valley is surrounded on all sides by deforested ridges except on the south-east direction where the valley opens up to the mangrove swampy coast which is about 1 km from the present locality. This valley is a rich source for the availability of marine shells. The valley floor is drained by a fresh water stream called Mithakhari nullah, which is the only source of natural fresh water in the area. Probably, this is the determinant factor for the occurrence of cluster of shell midden sites (i.e. Mithakhari I-VII) as observed in the valley. This valley floor is now under paddy cultivation. Mithakhari V stands isolated overlying the rocky outcrop seen exposed on the side of the mound. The accumulation of cultural debris looks like a conical heap. The mound is circular in shape, measures about 23 m in diameter with a height of 4-5 m. A trial trench measuring 1 sq. m was laid at the highest point on the top of the mound. Digging continued up to the beach sand through cultural debris which is composed mostly of a variety of marine shells. The beach sand which is culturally sterile rests on the outcrop. A total cultural deposit of 2-1 m was encountered in the trial trench, in which various levels of shell dumps have been observed. The most interesting feature noted in the excavation was the sterile horizon occurring approximately 65 cm below surface. The sediments from this sterile horizon as well as subsequent stratum show that the site was deserted for some time and subsequently it was again reoccupied. A variety of marine shells comprise the major composition of the cultural debris. Preliminary observation shows that the variety and frequency of shells vary from one horizon to another. This 1This publication is referred to in the following pages by the year only. 2Thc Archaeological Survey of India is referred lo in the following pages as the 'Survey'. EXPLORATIONS AND EXCAVATIONS difference in the occurrence of shells is important for understanding the seasonal subsistence behaviour of man during the past as an adaptive mechanism to the coastal environment. Charred shells occur at various levels, but in less frequency. Apart from shells, crab claws and fish bones have been recovered almost from all levels. Fragmentary bones which are probably of Sus sp. are extremely few. Fragments of potsherds mostly handmade red ware were