A Tangled Web

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Tangled Web REVISED JANUARY 2016 A TANGLED WEB Polish-Jewish Relations in Wartime Northeastern Poland and the Aftermath (PART TWO) Mark Paul PEFINA Press Toronto 2016 © Mark Paul and Polish Educational Foundation in North America (Toronto), 2016 A Tangled Web is a revised and expanded version of an article that appeared in The Story of Two Shtetls, Brańsk and Ejszyszki, Part Two published by The Polish Educational Foundation in North America, 1998 Table of Contents Part Two: Partisan Relations and Warfare Polish Partisans, Jewish Partisans, Soviet Partisans …3 An Overview of Polish-Soviet Wartime Relations …20 Soviet Designs …60 The Spiral Begins …64 Acting on Orders to Eliminate the Polish Partisans …84 Jewish Historiography ..102 Jewish Partisans Join in Soviet Operations Against Polish Partisans ..126 German Raids, the Soviet Peril, and Inhospitable Jews ..160 Local Help, Food Forays and Pillaging ..206 Procuring Arms and Armed Raids ..248 Villagers Defend Themselves Against Raids ..272 The Raids Intensify ..282 2 Part Two: Partisan Relations and Warfare “One should not close one’s eyes to the fact that Home Army units in the Wilno area were fighting against the Soviet partisans for the liberation of Poland. And that is why the Jews who found themselves on the opposing side perished at the hands of Home Army soldiers —as enemies of Poland, and not as Jews.” Yisrael Gutman Historian, Yad Vashem Institute Polish Partisans, Jewish Partisans, Soviet Partisans According to Holocaust historians, the Jews who escaped the Nazi ghettos in northeastern Poland had to turn to the Soviet partisans for their salvation from both the Germans and the hostile local population.1 The Polish partisans of the Home Army (Armia Krajowa—AK)—or “White Poles” as they are called in the language of Soviet propaganda2—are portrayed as a “Fascist” formation who were collaborating with the 1 For a Jewish nationalist perspective on the organization of the Jewish partisan movement in northeastern Poland and its relationship with the Soviet partisans see Ainsztein, Jewish Resistance in Nazi-Occupied Europe, 302–25. The author relies exclusively on Jewish anecdotal sources and his pro-Soviet and anti-Polish bias is all too evident. 2 The designation “White Poles” (belopoliaki in Russian), which has a distinctively pejorative connotation, originated in Bolshevik propaganda during the Polish-Soviet War of 1919–1920. See Norman Davies, White Eagle, Red Star: The Polish Soviet War, 1919–20 (London: Macdonald, 1972), 89. It was intended to suggest—falsely—that the Poles were allied with the White Russian forces and foreign imperialists in the Russian Civil War. The use of the term “White Poles” in a World War II context is anachronistic. It came into vogue after the Germans uncovered, in April 1943, mass graves of Polish officers and officials murdered by the Soviets in Katyn forest in the early part of 1940. When the Poles called for an investigation by the International Red Cross, the Soviet Union formally severed diplomatic relations with the Polish government in exile in London on April 25, 1943, a step it had been planning for months. Molotov, the very person who had signed a non-aggression pact with Nazi Germany to facilitate the invasion and partition of Poland in September 1939, issued an outrageous note stating that there was “no doubt that between the Allies’ enemies, Hitler and the Polish Government, contact and collusion exist.” The Soviets accused the Poles of acting “to please Hitler’s tyranny” and iterated that they were acting in “collusion with the Hitlerite government.” For the full text of the note see <http://web.archive.org/web/20080616072448/http://www.electronicmuseum.ca/Poland- WW2/katyn_memorial_wall/kmw_note.html>. That gave the cue as to how the Polish undeground was to be regarded. From that point, the term “White Poles” was used by the Soviets to smear the Poles—again falsely—as reactionary fascists. The Polish leader, General Władysław Sikorski, was accused of being a fascist who was collaborating with Nazi Germany (the Soviet Union’s erstwhile ally), and the Polish partisans became “White Poles,” “White bandits,” “agents of Sikorski,” or simply “Polish fascists.” Soon after the Soviet partisan command in Moscow ordered the liquidation of the Polish underground loyal to the London government. See Tadeusz Gasztold, “Sowietyzacja i rusyfikacja Wileńszczyzny i Nowogródczyzny w działalności partyzantki sowieckiej w latach 1941–1944,” in Adam Sudoł, ed., Sowietyzacja Kresów Wschodnich II Rzeczypospolitej po 17 września 1939 (Bydgoszcz: Wyższa Szkoła Pedagogiczna w Bydgoszczy, 1998), 279; Krajewski, Na Ziemi Nowogródzkiej, 143; Zygmunt Boradyn, Niemen–rzeka niezgody: Polsko-sowiecka wojna partyzancka na Nowogródczyźnie 1943–1944 (Warsaw: Rytm, 1999), 114. Israeli historian Leonid Smilovitsky notes that these as well as other epithets such as “national fascists” and “Polish-Hitlerite units” were used to describe the Home Army in Soviet documents from that era. See Leonid Smilovitskii, Katastrofa evreev v Belorussii 1941–1944 gg. (Tel Aviv: Biblioteka Matveia Chernogo, 2000), 141. This book is available online in English translation as Leonid Smilovitsky, Holocaust in Belorussia, 1941–1944, Internet: <http://www.jewishgen.org/Yizkor/belarus/Belarus.html#TOC102>. Stalin did not shy away from making such charges 3 Germans and engaged in a war directed primarily against the Jews and Soviets. Soviet historiography paints a remarkably similar picture with the focus, of course, being on the Soviet partisans. Typical of Jewish ethno-nationalist historians, Yaffa Eliach repeatedly accuses the Home Army of hunting down and killing Jews hiding in the forest as well as those who were active in partisan groups. Another example is Howard L Adelson, who charges that The Polish Home Army, the Armja Krajova [sic], which was supposedly struggling against the Nazis, pursued the slaughter of the Jews with greater vigor than the war against the German conquerors.3 Many Jewish historians share these views. Yitzhak Arad provides the following synopsis: In Poland, the Home Army (A.K.—Armia Krajowa), the general Polish Partisan Movement, was not open to Jews. Moreover, thousands of Jews were murdered by the rightist factions of the official Polish underground. In eastern Poland, in Byelorussia, and sometimes in other areas as well, groups of Polish rightist guerillas took an active role in the killing of many Jewish families and partisans in the forest.4 openly in his dealings with Western leaders. In an outburst at the Tehran Conference in 1943, the man who approved the Katyn massacre hurled accusation after accusation at the London Poles, calling them cowards, Hitler’s accomplices, and murderers. See Lynne Olson and Stanley Cloud, A Question of Honor. The Kościuszko Squadron: Forgotten Heroes of World War II (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2003), 296. Curiously, the term “White Poles” was also borrowed by Nazi German propaganda. The relentless repetition of this hateful propaganda doubtless had a considerable effect on how Soviet-Jewsh partisans came to view Polish partisans. Today, the term “White Poles” retains currency only in Holocaust historiography. The anti-Polish propaganda renewed in 1943 was in fact a continuation of the anti-Polish campaign that became widespread at the time of the Soviet invasion of Poland in September 1939. For a description of that campaign, see Ewa M. Thompson, Imperial Knowledge: Russian Literature and Colonialism (Westport, Connecticut and London: Greenpoint Press, 2000), 163–81; Ewa M. Thompson, “Nationalist Propaganda in the Soviet Russian Press, 1939–1941,” Slavic Review, vol. 50, no. 2 (Summer 1991): 385– 99. In spite of all this Soviet agitation, intensive efforts on the part of the Germans, starting in 1943, to win over the Poles to the “anti-Bolshevik front” met with a complete fiasco. See Czesław Brzoza and Andrzej Sowa, Historia Polski 1918–1945 (Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie, 2006), 609–10, 639–40. 3 Actually, this is part of a long litany of charges often hurled at Poles. In his introduction to a Holocaust memoir cited in this book, Howard L. Adelson, professor of history at the City University of New York, writes: “It was not by chance that the inhuman Nazi murderers chose Poland as the charnel house for European Jewry. With forethought they recognized that within Poland the neighbors of the Jews would assist in the slaughter … Even the Home Army, the Armja Krajova [sic], which was supposedly struggling against the Nazis, pursued the slaughter of the Jews with greater vigor than the war against the German conquerors. The local peasantry displayed an atavistic savagery that is unequalled in the annals of human history. Jews died while their neighbors exulted in their suffering.” See Samuel Gruber, as told to Gertrude Hirschler, I Chose Life (New York: Shengold, 1978), 6. 4 Yitzhak Arad, “Jewish Armed Resistance in Eastern Europe,” in Yisrael Gutman and Livia Rothkirchen, eds., The Catastrophe of European Jews: Antecedents, History, Reflections: Selected Papers (Jerusalem: Yad Vashem, 1976), 509. The charge that the Home Army did not accept Jews into its ranks was dealt with earlier in this essay. Arad also refers to a group Jewish ghetto fighters from Warsaw who made it to the forest and were allegedly killed by the Home Army. The events in Wyszków forest are dealt with in Part Three of this book. Moshe Kahanowitz has made even stronger accusations, alleging that “the majority” of Poland’s Christian population “willingly collaborated with the Germans in the extermination of the Jews. Many of them indeed, exceeded even the Germans in their bloodlust and their insensate hatred of Jews. … The ‘good friends’, who for a time agreed to help the Jews to hide, sooner or later murdered them in cold blood after first robbing them of whatever possessions they had. … The ‘A.K.’ refused to accept Jews in its ranks. Moreover one of its objectives was to exterminate the Jewish survivors who had sought refuge in the 4 In 1943, armed anti-Soviet groups belonging to … the Polish AK began operating in the forests of western Byelorussia … They were diehard anti-Semites, identifying the Jews with the hated Soviet rule.
Recommended publications
  • Khrushchev Lied
    Chapter 14. Snyder’s Accusations of Soviet Anti-Semitism in Bloodlands Chapter 11 What is the Truth? И вдруг на этом обсуждении премий Сталин, обращаясь к членам Политбюро и говорит: - У нас в ЦК антисемиты завелись. Это безобразие! - Так это было. Тихон Хренников о времени и о себе. М.: «Музыка» 1994, с. 179. Translated: And suddenly during this discussion of the prizes Stalin turned towards the members of the Politburo and said: - Antisemites have turned up in our Central Com- mittee. It is a disgrace! -Thus It Was. Tikhon Khrennikov about His Times and Himself. Moscow: “Muzyka” 1994, p. 179. The Lie That Stalin Was Anti-Semitic Snyder’s book is subtitled “Europe Between Hitler and Stalin.” He speaks of “twelve years, between 1933 and 1945, while both Hitler and Stalin were in power.” (vii) Hitler committed suicide in April 1945. So why does Snyder have a chapter that deals with events in the USSR from 1948 to 1952, when Hitler was long dead? The reason, presumably, is that Snyder cannot find any anti-Semitism by Stalin, the Soviet government, or pro-Soviet forces like the Polish com- munist-led People’s Army (Armia Ludowa, AL). On the contrary: all Chapter Fourteen. Snyder’s Accusations of Soviet Anti-Semitism 487 the anti-Semitism between 1933 and 1945, aside from the Nazis, was by anticommunist forces like the Polish government-in-exile, its underground Home Army and Ukrainian nationalists. And their anti-Semitism was immense! Snyder supports, and is supported by, the political forces in pre- sent-day Poland and Ukraine that are fiercely anticommunist — Snyder approves of that — but are also anti-Semitic in their un- guarded moments.
    [Show full text]
  • Niepodl Wyd2.Indd
    43 Cena 32,00 zł (w tym 8% VAT) Czasopismo humanistyczne 44 Muzeum Niepodległości w Warszawie Rocznik XX • 2013 • nr 3-4 (43-44) Czasopismo humanistyczne Muzeum Niepodległości w Warszawie Rocznik XX • 2013 • nr 3-4 (43-44) „Niepodległość i Pamięć” Czasopismo humanistyczne 2013 © copyright by Muzeum Niepodległości w Warszawie RECENZENT NAUKOWY prof. dr hab. Adam Dobroński REDAKTOR NACZELNY dr Tadeusz Skoczek REDAKTOR NUMERU Krzysztof Bąkała KOLEGIUM REDAKCYJNE dr Stefan Artymowski Paweł Bezak Jan Engelgard (z-ca red. naczelnego) Joanna Gierczyńska Andrzej Kotecki Krzysztof Mordyński dr Emil Noiński Dorota Panowek (sekretarz redakcji) Sylwia Szczotka Jerzy Wągrodzki dr Jolanta Załęczny Na okładce: Zespół ludowy polsko-czesko-ukraiński z Werby w po- wiecie dubieńskim, 1936 r., zbiory Zbigniewa Wojcieszka. Fotografi a prezentowana na wystawie czasowej Muzeum Niepodległości „Wołyń czasu zagłady 1939–1945”. ISSN 1427-1443 Spis treści Słowo wstępne ........................................................................................... 5 ARTYKUŁY Krzysztof Bąkała, ,,Przybyli na Wołyń nieproszeni…” .........................9 Franciszek Ziejka, „Przy lackim orle, przy koniu Kiejstuta, Archanioł Rusi na proporcach błysł!”. Tradycje unii horodelskiej w życiu narodo- wym czasów niewoli ............................................................................49 Dariusz Faszcza, Komenda Okręgu AK Wołyń wobec eksterminacji lud- ności polskiej w 1943 r ......................................................................... 73 Mieczysław Samborski,
    [Show full text]
  • A Yiddish Text from Auschwitz: Critical History and the Anthological Imagination
    11 PROJECT M1 USE A Yiddish Text from Auschwitz: Critical History and the Anthological Imagination David Suchoff Prooftexts, Volume 19, Number 1, January 1999, pp. 59-69 (Article) Published by Indiana University Press DOI: 10.1353/ptx.1999.0001 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/ptx/summary/v019/19.1.suchoff.html Access Provided by Brandeis University Libraries at 10/18/12 4: 13PM GMT DAVID SUCHOFF A Yiddish Text from Auschwitz: Critical History and the Anthological Imagination Introduction The following text, written at Auschwitz on 3 January 1945, introduces an anthology of writingscomposed by Jewish prisoners within Auschwitz itself. That anthology was lost, while this remnant remains. Avraham Levite's piece, pre­ sented here in a new translation, offers itself as a plea fromthe "other planet" that was Auschwitz to postwar generations, calling upon them to appreciate a fully Jewish and critical historical voice that was forged within its bounds. The introduction presciently voices its author's certainty that Jewish life at Auschwitz and the Holocaust as a whole would be distorted in representations of the event, submerged by a world eager to ease its conscience, cry and feel better, and thus to deny or minimize the facts of Jewish suffering. The price of world recognition, Levite reasons from history, would be the diminution of the powerful voice of Yiddish life. This concern with the difference between history and memory gives Levite's text an uncannily contemporary ring, as it presciently calls upon its readers to beware of the lures of an "objective" history.
    [Show full text]
  • The Warsaw Uprising
    The Warsaw Uprising The Warsaw Uprising Lesson plan (Polish) Lesson plan (English) The Warsaw Uprising Historical reconstrucon of the bales in Mokotów of 1944 Source: Piotr VaGla Waglowski, Rekonstrukcja historyczna walk na Mokotowie w 1944, 2008, domena publiczna. Link to the Lesson You will learn what was the Operation Tempest and how did the Warsaw Uprising proceed. Nagranie dostępne na portalu epodreczniki.pl Nagranie abstraktu Approaching from the East, the Red Army entered the pre‐war Polish territories in 1944. Thus, a military operation (Operation Tempest) was prepared in order to initiate local uprisings and liberate Poland from the German occupation. It was meant as a move to show the approaching Russians that the territories they were on had their owners already – the Poles – and their own authorities, represented by the government‐in‐exile. Unfortunately, the attempts to coordinate joint operations between the Polish Home Army and the Red Army usually ended with the arrests of the Poles. Such situations took place repeatedly, both after the liberation of Vilnius and the capture of Lviv. It clearly demonstrated Stalin’s attitude towards the Polish government‐in‐exile and their representatives in the occupied country. The situation was further accentuated by the creation of the Polish Committee of National Liberation in July 1944 as a competing authority. However, the Red Army, approaching the outskirts of Warsaw, rekindled the hopes for the quick liberation of the capital. In that situation, the Government Delegate at Home, Stanisław Jankowski, and the Home Army Commander, General Tadeusz Bór Komorowski, decided to start an armed uprising in the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Aufstieg Und Fall Von Jürgen Stroop (1943-1952): Von Der Beförderung Zum Höheren SS- Und Polizeiführer Bis Zur Hinrichtung
    Aufstieg und Fall von Jürgen Stroop (1943-1952): von der Beförderung zum Höheren SS- und Polizeiführer bis zur Hinrichtung. Eine Analyse zur Darstellung seiner Person anhand ausgewählter Quellen. Diplomarbeit zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades einer Magistra der Philosophie an der Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz vorgelegt von Beatrice BAUMGARTNER am Institut für Geschichte Begutachter: Univ.-Doz. Dr. Klaus Höd Graz, 2019 Ehrenwörtliche Erklärung Ich erkläre ehrenwörtlich, dass ich die vorliegende Arbeit selbstständig und ohne fremde Hilfe verfasst, andere als die angegebenen Quellen nicht benutzt und die Quellen wörtlich oder inhaltlich entnommenen Stellen als solche kenntlich gemacht habe. Die Arbeit wurde bisher in gleicher oder ähnlicher Form keiner anderen inländischen oder ausländischen Prüfungsbehörde vorgelegt und auch noch nicht veröffentlicht. Die vorliegende Fassung entspricht der eingereichten elektronischen Version. Datum: Unterschrift: I Gleichheitsgrundsatz Aus Gründen der Lesbarkeit wird in der Diplomarbeit darauf verzichtet, geschlechterspezifische Formulierungen zu verwenden. Soweit personenbezogene Bezeichnungen nur in männlicher Form angeführt sind, beziehen sie sich auf Männer und Frauen in gleicher Weise. II Danksagung In erster Linie möchte ich mich bei meinem Mentor Univ.-Doz. Dr. Klaus Hödl bedanken, der mir durch seine kompetente, freundliche und vor allem unkomplizierte Betreuung das Verfassen meiner Abschlussarbeit erst möglich machte. Hoch anzurechnen ist ihm dabei, dass er egal zu welcher Tages- und Nachtzeit
    [Show full text]
  • Sowiniec 46.Pdf
    Czerwiec 2015 PÓŁROCZNIK Nr 46 Sowiniec Półrocznik Centrum Dokumentacji Czynu Niepodległościowego The Sowiniec A Semiannual Journal of the Center for Research and Documentation of the Polish Struggles for Independence Adres \ Address: https://www.sowiniec.com.pl The Internet service of the periodical: www.akademicka.pl/sowiniec Wersja elektroniczna czasopisma jest wersją pierwotną The primary version of the journal is the electronic format Czasopismo jest indeksowane w bazach danych: The periodical is indexed in the databases Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) Frankfurt am Main, Germany ‘The Central European Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities’ (C.E.J.S.H.) Poznań, Praha, Budapest, Bratislava Rada Naukowa \ The Scholarly Board: Prof. dr hab. Andrzej Nowak (Uniwersytet Jagielloński) Prof. dr hab. Grzegorz Ostasz (Uniwersytet Rzeszowski) Prof. dr hab. Wojciech Rojek (Uniwersytet Jagielloński) Redaktor naczelny \ The Editor-in-Chief: Prof. dr hab. Tomasz Gąsowski (Uniwersytet Jagielloński), e-mail: [email protected] Recenzenci \ The External Reviewers of this volume: Prof. dr hab. Mariusz Wołos (Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny w Krakowie) Dr hab. Filip Musiał (Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie) Zespół redakcyjny \ The Editorial Team: Adam Roliński (Uniwersytet Jagielloński), (sekretarz redakcji – [email protected]) dr Jerzy Bukowski, Andrzej Fischer, Grzegorz Gill, Ludomir Olkuśnik Redaktor tematyczny \ Sub-editors: Dr hab. Henryk Głębocki (Uniwersytet Jagielloński), (history) Redaktor językowy \ The Polish Language Consultant: Joanna Nazimek (Polish philology) Redaktor języka angielskiego \ The English language editor: Artur Zwolski Publikacja dofinansowana przez: Wojewódzki Komitet Ochrony Pamięci, Walk i Męczeństwa w Krakowie W numerze wykorzystano fotografie ze zbiorów FCDCN, Muzeum Armii Krajowej oraz dostarczone przez autorów ISSN 1425-1965 Spis Treści Tomasz Gąsowski, Słowo od redaktora .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Assets – Lesson 6
    Supplemental Assets – Lesson 6 The following resources are from the archives at Yad Vashem and can be used to supplement Lesson 6, Jewish Resistance, in Echoes and Reflections. In this lesson, you learn about the many forms of Jewish resistance efforts during the Holocaust. You also consider the risks of resisting Nazi domination. For more information on Jewish resistance efforts during the Holocaust click on the following links: • Resistance efforts in the Vilna ghetto • Resistance efforts in the Kovno ghetto • Armed resistance in the Sobibor camp • Resistance efforts in Auschwitz-Birkenau • Organized resistance efforts in the Krakow ghetto: Cracow (encyclopedia) • Mordechai Anielewicz • Marek Edelman • Zvia Lubetkin • Rosa Robota • Hannah Szenes In this lesson, you meet Helen Fagin. Learn more about Helen's family members who perished during the Holocaust by clicking on the pages of testimony identified with a . For more information about Jan Karski, click here. In this lesson, you meet Vladka Meed. Learn more about Vladka's family members who perished during the Holocaust by clicking on the pages of testimony identified by a . Key Words • The "Final Solution" • Jewish Fighting Organization, Warsaw (Z.O.B.) • Oneg Shabbat • Partisans • Resistance, Jewish • Sonderkommando Encyclopedia • Jewish Military Union, Warsaw (ZZW) • Kiddush Ha-Hayim • Kiddush Ha-Shem • Korczak, Janusz • Kovner, Abba • Holocaust Diaries • Pechersky, Alexandr • Ringelblum, Emanuel • Sonderkommando • United Partisan Organization, Vilna • Warsaw Ghetto Uprising •
    [Show full text]
  • Making Defiance Where He Built a Trucking Business with His Wife Lilka, (Played in the Film by Alexa Davalos)
    24 | Lexington’s Colonial Times Magazine MARCH | APRIL 2009 a book, and a book is not a movie. So it has to be different. I cannot put everything that comes from years of work into two hours.’” “Did you actually talk to Tuvia?” prompted Leon Tec. His wife introduced him to the audience as “The troublemaker, my husband.” After the war Tuvia Bielski moved first to Israel and then to New York, Making Defiance where he built a trucking business with his wife Lilka, (played in the film by Alexa Davalos). Nechama Tec had spoken with him by telephone while researching her book “In the Lion’s Den,” but all attempts to meet in person had been stymied by Lilka Bielski’s excuses. Finally, Tec secured a meeting at the Bielskis’ Brooklyn home in May 1987. She hired a driver for the two-hour drive from Westport, Conn., and was greeted by Lilka, who told her that Tuvia had had a bad night, was very sick, and could not see her as planned. Tec said that she was leaving for Israel the next day on a research trip, and was politely insistent. “I want to get a sense of the man before I go,” she told Lilka. “So we’re going back and forth on the doorstep and she doesn’t let me in, and we hear a voice from the other room, ‘Let her in,’” recalled Tec. Tuvia Bielski, clearly weak and very sick, came out to meet her, dismissed the hovering Lilka, and sat down with Tec and her tape recorder.
    [Show full text]
  • Peter Black Odilo Globocnik, Nazi Eastern Policy, and the Implementation of the Final Solution
    www.doew.at – Dokumentationsarchiv des österreichischen Widerstandes (Hrsg.), Forschungen zum Natio- nalsozialismus und dessen Nachwirkungen in Österreich. Festschrift für Brigitte Bailer, Wien 2012 91 Peter Black Odilo Globocnik, Nazi Eastern Policy, and the Implementation of the Final Solution During the spring of 1943, while on an inspection tour of occupied Poland that included a briefing on the annihilation of the Polish Jews, SS Personnel Main Office chief Maximilian von Herff characterized Lublin District SS and Police Leader and SS-Gruppenführer Odilo Globocnik, in the following way: “A man fully charged with all possible light and dark sides. Little concerned with ap- pearances, fanatically obsessed with the task, [he] engages himself to the limit without concern for health or superficial recognition. His energy drives him of- ten to breach existing boundaries and to forget the boundaries established for him within the [SS-] Order – not out of personal ambition, but much more for the sake of his obsession with the matter at hand. His success speaks unconditionally for him.”1 Von Herff’s analysis of Globocnik’s reflected a consistent pattern in the ca- reer of the Nazi Party organizer and SS officer, who characteristically atoned for his transgressions of the National Socialist code of behavior by fanatical pursuit and implementation of core Nazi goals.2 Globocnik was born to Austro-Croat parents on April 21, 1904 in multina- tional Trieste, then the principal seaport of the Habsburg Monarchy. His father’s family had come from Neumarkt (Tržič), in Slovenia. Franz Globocnik served as a Habsburg cavalry lieutenant and later a senior postal official; he died of pneumonia on December 1, 1919.
    [Show full text]
  • Lublin Ghetto
    Coordinates: 51°15′11″N 22°34′18″E Lublin Ghetto The Lublin Ghetto was a World War II ghetto created by Lublin Ghetto Nazi Germany in the city of Lublin on the territory of General Government in occupied Poland.[1] The ghetto inmates were mostly Polish Jews, although a number of Roma were also brought in.[2] Set up in March 1941, the Lublin Ghetto was one of the first Nazi-era ghettos slated for liquidation during the most deadly phase of the Holocaust in occupied Poland.[3] Between mid-March and mid-April 1942 over 30,000 Jews were delivered to their deaths in cattle trucks at the Bełżec extermination camp and additional 4,000 at Majdanek.[1][4] Two German soldiers in the Lublin Ghetto, May 1941 Contents Also known as German: Ghetto Lublin or Lublin Reservat History Liquidation of the Ghetto Location Lublin, German-occupied Poland See also Incident type Imprisonment, forced labor, References starvation, exile External links Organizations Nazi SS Camp deportations to Belzec extermination camp and Majdanek History Victims 34,000 Polish Jews Already in 1939–40, before the ghetto was officially pronounced, the SS and Police Leader Odilo Globocnik (the SS district commander who also ran the Jewish reservation), began to relocate the Lublin Jews further away from his staff headquarters at Spokojna Street,[5] and into a new city zone set up for this purpose. Meanwhile, the first 10,000 Jews had been expelled from Lublin to the rural surroundings of the city beginning in early March.[6] The Ghetto, referred to as the Jewish quarter (or Wohngebiet der Juden), was formally opened a year later on 24 March 1941.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Subjects
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-83875-7 - Jewish Forced Labor Under the Nazis: Economic Needs and Racial Aims, 1938-1944 Wolf Gruner Index More information Index of Subjects Aktion Erntefest, 271 Autobahn camps, 286 Aktion Hase, 96 acceptance/rejection of Jews for, 197, Aktion Mitte B, 97 198 Aktion Reinhard, 258 administration of by private companies, Aktion T4, 226 203 Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse (AOK). See closing of, 208, 209, 211 General Local Health Insurance control of by Autobahn authorities, 199, Provider. 203, 213, 219 Annexation of Austria. See Anschluss. control of by SS (Schmelt), 214, 223 Anschluss (annexation of Austria), xvi, xxii, employing Polish Jews, 183, 198, 203, 3, 105, 107, 136, 278 217, 286 Anti-Jewish policy locations of, 203, 212, 219, 220 before 1938, xx, xxii, xxiv redesignation of as “Zwangsarbeitslager,” central measures in, xxi, xxii, xxiii 223 consequences of for Jews, xvi, 107, 109, regulations for, 199, 200, 203, 212 131, 274 See also Fuhrer’s¨ road and Schmelt forced contradiction in, 109 labor camps. diminished SS role in, 240, 276 Autobahn construction management division of labor principle in, xvii, xviii, headquarters (Oberste Bauleitung der xxiv, 30, 112, 132, 244, 281, 294 Reichsautobahnen) effect of war on, 8, 9, 126, 141, 142 in Austria, 127 forced labor as element of, x, xii, xiii, 3, 4, in Berlin, 199, 200, 202, 203, 204, 205, 177, 276 206 in Austria, 136 in Breslau, 204, 205, 211, 212, 220, local-central interaction in, xx, xxi, xxii 222 local measures in, xxi, xxii, xxiii, 150, in Cologne, 205 151 in Danzig, 203, 204, 205 measures implementing, 151, 172, 173, See also Reich Autobahn Directorates.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Behavior During the Holocaust
    VICTIMS’ POLITICS: JEWISH BEHAVIOR DURING THE HOLOCAUST by Evgeny Finkel A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Political Science) at the UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN–MADISON 2012 Date of final oral examination: 07/12/12 The dissertation is approved by the following members of the Final Oral Committee: Yoshiko M. Herrera, Associate Professor, Political Science Scott G. Gehlbach, Professor, Political Science Andrew Kydd, Associate Professor, Political Science Nadav G. Shelef, Assistant Professor, Political Science Scott Straus, Professor, International Studies © Copyright by Evgeny Finkel 2012 All Rights Reserved i ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This dissertation could not have been written without the encouragement, support and help of many people to whom I am grateful and feel intellectually, personally, and emotionally indebted. Throughout the whole period of my graduate studies Yoshiko Herrera has been the advisor most comparativists can only dream of. Her endless enthusiasm for this project, razor- sharp comments, constant encouragement to think broadly, theoretically, and not to fear uncharted grounds were exactly what I needed. Nadav Shelef has been extremely generous with his time, support, advice, and encouragement since my first day in graduate school. I always knew that a couple of hours after I sent him a chapter, there would be a detailed, careful, thoughtful, constructive, and critical (when needed) reaction to it waiting in my inbox. This awareness has made the process of writing a dissertation much less frustrating then it could have been. In the future, if I am able to do for my students even a half of what Nadav has done for me, I will consider myself an excellent teacher and mentor.
    [Show full text]