DOCSLIB.ORG

2016 NHPA Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2016 NHPA Annual Report January 30, 2017 Julianne Polanco, State Historic Preservation Officer Attention: Mark Beason Office of Historic Preservation 1725 23rd Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95816 John Fowler, Executive Director Attention: Najah Duvall Office of Federal Agency Programs Advisory Council on Historic Preservation 401 F Street NW, Suite 308 Washington, DC 20001 Laura Joss, Regional Director Attention: Elaine Jackson-Retondo National Park Service – Pacific West Regional Office 333 Bush Street San Francisco, CA 94104 Craig Kenkel, Acting Superintendent Attention: Steve Haller Golden Gate National Recreation Area Building 201 Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94123 Reference: 2016 Annual Report on Activities under the 2014 Presidio Trust Programmatic Agreement, the Presidio of San Francisco National Historic Landmark District, San Francisco, California Pursuant to Stipulation XIV of the Presidio Trust Programmatic Agreement (PTPA, 2014), enclosed is the 2016 Annual Report of activities conducted under that PA. In 2016, the Presidio Trust celebrated the 50th anniversary of the National Historic Preservation Act alongside the nation’s preservation community with a sense of reflection, gratitude and forward-looking purpose. We were also pleased to commemorate the centennial anniversary of the National Park Service, and thank our partners for their trailblazing role in preserving American cultural heritage here in California and beyond. Our principal activity for recognizing these milestones was to host the 41st annual California Preservation Foundation conference at the Presidio in April. At the conference we were enormously proud to be recognized by CPF president Kelly Sutherlin McLeod as “perhaps the biggest preservation success story of the 20th century”, praise that would not be possible without the contributions of our partner agencies, tenants and park users. We are exceptionally grateful for the many preservation advocates, professionals and organizations that have made the revitalization of the Presidio of San Francisco such a success, and we look forward to your continued collaboration as we embark on the NHPA’s next 50 years. The enclosed report documents all compliance decisions, including Appendix A, administrative and full reviews for the calendar year 2016. Between January and December 2016, 44 projects were reviewed by Trust preservation professionals through Stipulation IV of the PA (commonly referred to as the “N2” process). Of these, 39 were reviewed at the administrative level and 5 at the full level of review. Undertakings reviewed included the rehabilitation of a Montgomery Street barracks to expand the Presidio’s hotel offerings, reforestation of a key historic stand of cypress trees, and reuse of a historic streetcar depot for two public-serving tenants. As in years past, the Trust reviewed a substantial number of “repetitive or low impact activities” through Appendix A of the PA. Appendix A includes actions such as cleaning, painting and cyclic repairs to buildings, replacement in-kind of deteriorated roofs, road and parking lot maintenance, abatement of hazardous materials, and other such low impact activities. The N2 team that participates in the agency’s project review process is comprised of eight preservation professionals that meet the Secretary of Interior’s standards for Archaeology, Historic Architecture, and Architectural History. The group of historic preservation staff regularly involved in full N2 reviews in 2016 is composed of historical architect Rob Wallace; historical landscape architect Michael Lamb; conservator and preservation project manager Christina Wallace; archaeologists Eric Blind, Kari Jones, and Liz Clevenger, (who are supported by staff archaeologists Juliana Fernandez and Edward DeHaro); and historic compliance staff Rob Thomson and Michelle Taylor. Staff historian Barbara Berglund also regularly contributes to preservation-related reviews. The historic compliance staff continues to collaborate closely with the Trust’s operations and maintenance crews, who work with the NHLD’s buildings, landscapes, roads and forests on a daily basis. These crews are composed of journeymen carpenters, masons, electricians, plumbers, gardeners and foresters, many of whom have been trained in preservation maintenance practice, and/or have multiple years of experience working with historic resources at the Presidio. Jean Fraser, the Trust’s new Chief Executive Officer joined the agency in September of 2016, kicking off a new era of leadership at the Presidio. Ms. Fraser came to the Trust following previous roles as the CEO of the San Francisco Health Plan, Chief of the San Mateo County Health System, and service in the San Francisco City Attorney's Office. In September, Ms. Fraser appointed Rob Thomson as the agency’s Federal Preservation Officer, a role he had performed in an acting capacity since early 2016. Also in September, Michelle Taylor assumed the title of Historic Preservation Specialist, owing to her enhanced role managing the department’s annual historic preservation intern and developing in-house training activities for Trust staff working with historic resources. She continues to carry out her previous duties of administering the Trust’s environmental and historic preservation review process, and acting as a liaison with our residential, building maintenance, project management and development teams on historic preservation issues. Additionally, Christina Wallace was promoted to Senior Project Manager for Historic Preservation ii in recognition of her exceptional contributions to several of the Presidio’s most challenging projects. Work continued on the Doyle Drive/Presidio Parkway project throughout 2016, including relocation and the first phases of rehabilitating building 201 (Warehouse, 1896), progress on delivering final parking lots and landscape areas throughout the project corridor, and soil stabilization measures to construct the re-created Main Post Bluff. Remaining work to be performed includes final landscape design and construction and completion of several remaining mitigation measures agreed to by the project. The Trust continues its strong working relationship with Caltrans, National Park Service and San Francisco County Transportation Authority cultural resource staff to ensure that the NHLD is well-protected and the commitments under the Doyle Drive PA are carried out. The Trust continued consultation on the Tunnel Tops (formerly New Presidio Parklands project) throughout 2016, including responding to comments from PTPA parties on the Environmental Assessment and Preliminary Finding of Effect, finalization of project design guidelines and continued coordination with Caltrans/FHWA regarding handover conditions from the Doyle Drive project. Design for the project continued through 2016, and the Trust looks forward to concluding consultation and releasing final designs to agency stakeholders and the public in 2017. Cyclic and preservation maintenance activities in 2016 included a continuation of the agency’s highly-successful preservation maintenance program for unoccupied historic buildings, along with work performed on the historic Simonds Loop, Upper Kobbe, Riley and East Washington residential neighborhoods. In 2016, Trust crews completed stabilization work on Crissy Field’s building 651 (Administrative Building, 1921), including critical roof and downspout repairs, along with exterior envelope patching and painting. Building 951 (Bachelor Officers’ Quarters, 1921) located at the eastern end of Pilots Row in north Fort Scott received roof repairs, paint and carpentry work to deteriorated historic elements such as its rooftop balustrade. Roof and exterior envelope repairs continued in the nine-building Thornburgh area of the Old Letterman Hospital complex (built 1899-1938), resulting in the completed mothballing of buildings 1040, 1047, 1062, 1060, 1059 and 1056. The Trust’s preservation maintenance activities continue to rely on a strong collaboration between the Trust’s building maintenance and compliance departments, which meet weekly and regularly collaborate on scope development and project prioritization. Trust documentation efforts continued to inform project design development and consultation support in 2016, including two historic structure reports prepared in 2015 (building 99, Theater, 1939; and building 105, Montgomery Street Barracks, 1895). In December, construction began on building 105, which the Trust will adaptively reuse as a 42-room hotel scheduled to open in the spring of 2018. A prospective tenant for the Theatre submitted successful parts 1 and 2 applications for the Federal Historic Preservation Tax Credit program; construction on building 99 should begin in 2017 pending completion of lease negotiations. This project was facilitated by an amendment to the 2010 Programmatic Agreement for the Main Post Update (PA-MPU) that was executed in 2016, creating a process by which MPU projects could participate in the tax credit program while meeting other commitments under that agreement document. Also in 2016, design guidelines for the Tunnel Tops project were updated per agency comment and finalized in the spring to help guide that project through its final phases of design. iii The Trust continued landscape rehabilitation and habitat restoration work in the Tennessee Hollow watershed in 2016 consistent with plans analyzed in the 2008 Environmental Assessment and the 2001 Vegetation Management Plan. The MacArthur Meadow project was largely completed, including
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Italian Bookshelf
    This page intentionally left blank x . ANNALI D’ITALIANISTICA 37 (2019) Italian Bookshelf www.ibiblio.org/annali Andrea Polegato (California State University, Fresno) Book Review Coordinator of Italian Bookshelf Anthony Nussmeier University of Dallas Editor of Reviews in English Responsible for the Middle Ages Andrea Polegato California State University, Fresno Editor of Reviews in Italian Responsible for the Renaissance Olimpia Pelosi SUNY, Albany Responsible for the 17th, 18th, and 19th Centuries Monica Jansen Utrecht University Responsible for 20th and 21st Centuries Enrico Minardi Arizona State University Responsible for 20th and 21st Centuries Alessandro Grazi Leibniz Institute of European History, Mainz Responsible for Jewish Studies REVIEW ARTICLES by Jo Ann Cavallo (Columbia University) 528 Flavio Giovanni Conti and Alan R. Perry. Italian Prisoners of War in Pennsylvania, Allies on the Home Front, 1944–1945. Lanham, MD: Fairleigh Dickinson Press, 2016. Pp. 312. 528 Flavio Giovanni Conti e Alan R. Perry. Prigionieri di guerra italiani in Pennsylvania 1944–1945. Bologna: Il Mulino, 2018. Pp. 372. 528 Flavio Giovanni Conti. World War II Italian Prisoners of War in Chambersburg. Charleston: Arcadia, 2017. Pp. 128. Contents . xi GENERAL & MISCELLANEOUS STUDIES 535 Lawrence Baldassaro. Baseball Italian Style: Great Stories Told by Italian American Major Leaguers from Crosetti to Piazza. New York: Sports Publishing, 2018. Pp. 275. (Alan Perry, Gettysburg College) 537 Mario Isnenghi, Thomas Stauder, Lisa Bregantin. Identitätskonflikte und Gedächtniskonstruktionen. Die „Märtyrer des Trentino“ vor, während und nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg. Cesare Battisti, Fabio Filzi und Damiano Chiesa. Berlin: LIT, 2018. Pp. 402. (Monica Biasiolo, Universität Augsburg) 542 Journal of Italian Translation. Ed. Luigi Bonaffini.
    [Show full text]
  • Contra Costa County
    Historical Distribution and Current Status of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California Robert A. Leidy, Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA Gordon S. Becker, Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA Brett N. Harvey, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA This report should be cited as: Leidy, R.A., G.S. Becker, B.N. Harvey. 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Marsh Creek Watershed Marsh Creek flows approximately 30 miles from the eastern slopes of Mt. Diablo to Suisun Bay in the northern San Francisco Estuary. Its watershed consists of about 100 square miles. The headwaters of Marsh Creek consist of numerous small, intermittent and perennial tributaries within the Black Hills. The creek drains to the northwest before abruptly turning east near Marsh Creek Springs. From Marsh Creek Springs, Marsh Creek flows in an easterly direction entering Marsh Creek Reservoir, constructed in the 1960s. The creek is largely channelized in the lower watershed, and includes a drop structure near the city of Brentwood that appears to be a complete passage barrier. Marsh Creek enters the Big Break area of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta northeast of the city of Oakley. Marsh Creek No salmonids were observed by DFG during an April 1942 visual survey of Marsh Creek at two locations: 0.25 miles upstream from the mouth in a tidal reach, and in close proximity to a bridge four miles east of Byron (Curtis 1942).
    [Show full text]
  • Presidio Trust 2015 Annual Report of Nhpa Compliance Activities
    PRESIDIO TRUST 2015 ANNUAL REPORT OF NHPA COMPLIANCE ACTIVITIES Table of Contents Cover Letter .................................................................................................................. i Exhibits Exhibit A Presidio Trust Programmatic Agreement ................................................. 1 Exhibit B Presidio Trust NHPA Compliance Review (N2) Process Overview ...... 34 Exhibit C Project Review per the PTPA ................................................................. 37 Exhibit D Archaeological Research, Projects, and Program Highlights ................. 66 Exhibit E National Register Evaluations ................................................................ 69 Exhibit F Consultation under Stipulation IV.C.2.................................................... 70 Exhibit G Multi-Agency Consultation Projects ....................................................... 71 Exhibit H Summary of Tax Credit Projects ............................................................. 77 Exhibit I Internal Preservation/Rehabilitation Projects ......................................... 78 Exhibit J Tenant Preservation/Rehabilitation Projects ........................................... 88 Exhibit K Personnel Training, Development, and Contacts .................................. ..91 Exhibit L Public Outreach ..................................................................................... ..94 Appendices Appendix A N2 Team Resumes Appendix B N2 Screening Form (blank) Appendix C N2 Flow Chart Appendix D Main Post Update
    [Show full text]
  • East Bay Regional Park District 2005 Budget
    EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT 2005 BUDGET January 1 to December 31, 2005 2005 Adopted Budget Page 1 East Bay Regional Park District Page Intentionally Left Blank 2005 Adopted Budget Page 2 East Bay Regional Park District TABLE OF CONTENTS VISION AND MISSION STATEMENTS .......................................................................... 7 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT MAP .............................................................. 9 HOW TO USE THIS BOOK............................................................................................ 11 SECTION A – GENERAL MANAGER’S MESSAGE..................................................... 13 SECTION B – BUDGET OVERVIEW ............................................................................ 21 BUDGET AT-A-GLANCE .................................................................................... 29 TOTAL RESOURCES BY CATEGORY AND MAJOR CHANGES ..................... 30 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS BY CATEGORY AND MAJOR CHANGES ............ 34 BUDGET BY FUND ............................................................................................ 37 BUDGET BY DIVISION AND DEPARTMENT .................................................... 38 AUTHORIZATION POSITIONS BY DIVISION AND DEPARTMENT ................. 40 GENERAL FUND ................................................................................................ 41 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS ............................................................................. 47 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wildcat Creek Restoration Action Plan Version 1.3 April 26, 2010 Prepared by the URBAN CREEKS COUNCIL for the WILDCAT-SAN PABLO WATERSHED COUNCIL
    wildcat creek restoration action plan version 1.3 April 26, 2010 prepared by THE URBAN CREEKS COUNCIL for the WILDCAT-SAN PABLO WATERSHED COUNCIL Adopted by the City of San Pablo on August 3, 2010 wildcat creek restoration action plan table of contents 1. INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 plan obJectives 5 1.2 scope 6 Urban Urban 1.5 Methods 8 1.5 Metadata c 10 reeks 2. WATERSHED OVERVIEW 12 c 2.1 introdUction o 12 U 2.2 watershed land Use ncil 13 2.3 iMpacts of Urbanized watersheds 17 april 2.4 hydrology 19 2.5 sediMent transport 22 2010 2.6 water qUality 24 2.7 habitat 26 2.8 flood ManageMent on lower wildcat creek 29 2.9 coMMUnity 32 3. PROJECT AREA ANALYSIS 37 3.1 overview 37 3.2 flooding 37 3.4 in-streaM conditions 51 3.5 sUMMer fish habitat 53 3.6 bioassessMent 57 4. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 58 4.1 obJectives, findings and strategies 58 4.2 recoMMended actions according to strategy 61 4.3 streaM restoration recoMMendations by reach 69 4.4 recoMMended actions for phase one reaches 73 t 4.5 phase one flood daMage redUction reach 73 able of 4.6 recoMMended actions for watershed coUncil 74 c ontents version 1.3 april 26, 2010 2 wildcat creek restoration action plan Urban creeks coUncil april 2010 table of contents 3 figUre 1-1: wildcat watershed overview to Point Pinole Regional Shoreline wildcat watershed existing trail wildcat creek highway railroad city of san pablo planned trail other creek arterial road bart Parkway SAN PABLO Richmond BAY Avenue San Pablo Point UP RR San Pablo WEST COUNTY BNSF RR CITY OF LANDFILL NORTH SAN PABLO RICHMOND San Pablo
    [Show full text]
  • REQUEST for QUALIFICATIONS and PROPOSALS Notice of Development Opportunity Historic Anitas Building: 920 Macdonald Ave
    REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS AND PROPOSALS Notice of Development Opportunity Historic Anitas Building: 920 Macdonald Ave. Macdonald Ave. and 11th St. - 1940’s Source: Online Archive of California City of Richmond, California Issued by the City of Richmond, CA City Manager’s Office, Development Services Submission Deadline: May 3, 2019 at 12:00 PM (PDT) City of Richmond, CA REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS AND PROPOSALS Notice of Development Opportunity 920 Macdonald Ave. City of Richmond, California City Council Mayor Tom Butt Vice Mayor Melvin Willis Councilmember Nathaniel Bates Councilmember Ben Choi Councilmember Eduardo Martinez Councilmember Jael Myrick Councilmember Demnlus Johnson III City Manager Carlos Martinez City Manager Bill Lindsay Stay updated on all Richmond Opportunity Sites: http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/OpportunitySites Request for Qualifications/Request for Proposals: 920 Macdonald Ave. 2 City of Richmond, CA Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................... 4 II. NEIGHBORHOOD & COMMUNITY ASSETS............................. 6 III. SITE VISION...................................................................................... 21 IV. SITE AND PARCEL SUMMARY...................................................... 23 V. DEVELOPMENT TEAM SELECTION............................................ 29 VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS..................................................... 30 VII. SELECTION CRITERIA, PROCESS & SCHEDULE.................. 33 VIII. CITY NON-LIABILITY & RELATED MATTERS....................
    [Show full text]
  • E a St Shor E Pa R K Proj Ec T Gen Er a L Pl
    PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT EASTSHORE PARK PROJECT GENERAL PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT STATE CLEARINGHOUSE # 2002022051 July 2002 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT EASTSHORE PARK PROJECT GENERAL PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT STATE CLEARINGHOUSE # 2002022051 Gray Davis Governor Mary D. Nichols Secretary for Resources Ruth Coleman Acting Director of Parks and Recreation P.O.Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 July 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT SUMMARY ............................................................................ 1 A. PURPOSE OF THE EIR........................................................................................................ 1 B. PROPOSED PROJECT ......................................................................................................... 2 C. PLANNING PROCESS......................................................................................................... 4 D. EIR SCOPE............................................................................................................................ 5 E. SUMMARY........................................................................................................................... 5 F. REPORT ORGANIZATION................................................................................................. 7 II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................... 9 A. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT Vision and Mission Statements
    EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT Vision and Mission Statements Vision The East Bay Regional Park District will preserve a priceless heritage of natural and cultural resources, open space, parks and trails for the future and will set aside park areas for the enjoyment and healthful recreation for generations to come. An environmental ethic guides us in all that we do. Mission The East Bay Regional Park District will achieve the above vision in the following ways: • Provide a diversified system of regional parklands, trails, and parkland-related services that will offer outstanding opportunities for creative use of outdoor time. • Acquire and preserve significant biologic, geologic, scenic, and historic resources within Alameda and Contra Costa Counties. • Manage, maintain and restore the parklands so that they retain their important scenic, natural, and cultural values. • Interpret the parklands by focusing educational programs on both the visitor’s relationship to nature, natural processes, ecology, history of the parklands, and the value of natural conditions. • Support the development and retention of well-trained, dedicated, and productive employees. • Improve access to and use of the parks by members of groups that have been underrepresented, such as disabled, economically disadvantaged, and elderly visitors. • Balance environmental concerns and outdoor recreational opportunities within regional parklands. • Provide recreational development that fosters appropriate use of parklands while preserving their remoteness and intrinsic value. • Create quality programs that recognize the cultural diversity represented in the region. • Participate in partnerships with public agencies, nonprofit organizations, volunteers, and the private sector to achieve mutual goals. • Provide leadership to help guide land use decisions of East Bay governments that relate to the District.
    [Show full text]
  • Consensus for Mussolini? Popular Opinion in the Province of Venice (1922-1943)
    UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM SCHOOL OF HISTORY AND CULTURES Department of History PhD in Modern History Consensus for Mussolini? Popular opinion in the Province of Venice (1922-1943) Supervisor: Prof. Sabine Lee Student: Marco Tiozzo Fasiolo ACADEMIC YEAR 2016-2017 2 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Declaration I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the University of Birmingham is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others (in which case the extent of any work carried out jointly by me and any other person is clearly identified in it). The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without my prior written consent. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of my words. 3 Abstract The thesis focuses on the response of Venice province population to the rise of Fascism and to the regime’s attempts to fascistise Italian society.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resources Richmond General Plan 2030 Community Vision Richmond, California in 2030
    14 Historic Resources Richmond General Plan 2030 Community Vision Richmond, California in 2030 Richmond showcases its abundant, well-preserved historic and cultural resources. The City’s history and social development is evident through its many interpretive features, historically-themed public art and surviving structures and landscapes. These character- defining resources contribute to the overall beauty and economic vitality of the City. Downtown, Point Richmond and the National Historical Park are a source of creativity and cultural reference. These areas, as well as other culturally significant activity hubs, have catalyzed further development and increased business activity and cultural tourism in Richmond. Rehabilitation and adaptive reuse projects enhance historic character while still meeting the contemporary needs of the community. New development responds to the character of historic surroundings with compatible site design, massing and complementary design details. Public outreach among residents and visitors has heightened awareness of Richmond’s pivotal role in involving women in the home front workforce, major contributions to the war effort and other important local history. Residents and visitors of all ages enjoy fes- tivals, community events and performances that trace the fascinating people who have helped shape Richmond today. 14 Historical Resources Richmond’s historic resources are woven throughout • Reviews the existing regulatory framework that the fabric of the City and offer a window into the guides historic resource planning efforts. community’s rich and colorful past. They provide tangible reminders of a past that includes the origi- Purpose of the Element nal indigenous inhabitants, early Spanish explorers Richmond’s historic resources provide an important and settlers and the American pioneers and city connection to the past, shaping the community’s builders.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional in Nature March - April 2012 East Bay Regional Park District Activity Guide
    Regional in Nature March - April 2012 East Bay Regional Park District Activity Guide www.ebparks.org Spring is wildfl ower season in the parks. A fi eld of owl’s clover covers Round Valley Regional Preserve near Brentwood. Look Photo: Mark Crumpler Crumpler Mark Photo: inside for guided wildfl ower hikes in the Regional Parks. Inside: Junior Lifeguards • page 4 Park’n It Summer Day Camp • page 5 Pole Walking • page 6 Fire Making and Cord Making at Coyote Hills • page 11 Kayaking Big Break • page 14 Tips for Choosing a Summer Day Camp, see page 2. Contents Aquatics/Jr. Lifeguards .........4 Signifi cant Addition to Wildcat Recreation Programs ...... 5-6 Ardenwood ................. 6-7, 10 Canyon Regional Park Black Diamond ...............7, 10 BY GENERAL MANAGER ROBERT E. DOYLE Botanic Garden ..................10 Wildcat Canyon Regional Park, with Like adjacent Wildcat Canyon, this passed by voters in 2008 to help Coyote Hills ...................10-11 its majestic hills, ridges, and peaks, is recently acquired land contains secure open space. We are fortunate Crab Cove ......................11-12 growing. The East Bay Regional Park a mix of oak woodlands and grassland to have these funds at this time so we District Board of Directors recently providing a natural habitat to precious can act quickly to make bargain land Sunol ..................................... 12 approved the purchase of 362 acres wildlife. At Park District staff purchases. We are also fortunate Tilden Nature Area ...........12 adjacent to Wildcat Canyon, making it recommendation, much of the to work with a number of partner the largest parcel acquired by the Park property will be held in land bank agencies with similar visions to make Other Regional Parks ...12-14 District in west Contra Costa County status until it can be made safe our Regional Park system the fi nest Volunteer Programs ..........14 in 35 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Finance Board Workshop EXHIBITS
    Capital Finance Board Workshop EXHIBITS April 27, 2018 Exhibit List 2018 Board Capital Finance Workshop April 27, 2018 Pages 1 through 42, the Capital Finance Board Workshop Memo, can be found on the District’s website at: http://www.ebparks.org/meetings EXHIBIT LIST 1a: GRANTS AA – WW Acquisition Funding ........................................................................................ 43 1b: GRANTS AA – WW Development Funding .................................................................................... 53 2a: Active Projects – 2018 Budget ............................................................................................................. 71 2b: 2018 Active Projects by Department .................................................................................................. 87 3: Measure CC Status Report ................................................................................................................... 89 4a: Measure AA Unappropriated Funds .................................................................................................. 111 4b: Measure AA Consolidated Funds ....................................................................................................... 113 5a: Measure WW Appropriations as of April 5, 2018 ......................................................................... 115 5b: Measure WW Remaining Balances, Sorted by Park ...................................................................... 125 5c: Measure WW Status Report as of April 5, 2018 ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]