DOCSLIB.ORG

Presidio Trust 2014 Annual Report of Nhpa Compliance Activities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Presidio Trust 2014 Annual Report of Nhpa Compliance Activities January 30, 2015 Carol Roland-Nawi, PhD State Historic Preservation Officer Attention: Mark Beason Office of Historic Preservation 1725 23rd Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95816 John Fowler, Executive Director Attention: Katherine Kerr Office of Federal Agency Programs Advisory Council on Historic Preservation 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 809 Old Post Office Building Washington, DC 20004 Christine Lehnertz, Regional Director Attention: Elaine Jackson-Retondo National Park Service – Pacific West Regional Office 333 Bush Street San Francisco, CA 94104 Frank Dean, Superintendent Attention: Steve Haller Golden Gate National Recreation Area Building 201 Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94123 Reference: 2014 Annual Report on Activities under the 2002 and 2014 Presidio Trust Programmatic Agreements, the Presidio of San Francisco National Historic Landmark District, San Francisco, California Pursuant to Stipulation XIV of the Presidio Trust Programmatic Agreement (PTPA, 2014), enclosed is the 2014 Annual Report of activities conducted under that PA. After 12 years, 1,073 projects reviewed, and many hundreds more documented the Trust retired the 2002 Programmatic Agreement this spring after successfully consulting on a new agency agreement document, executed in April. The number of project reviews accounts for the rehabilitation of over 300 individual buildings, dozens of contributing landscape features, millions of dollars in cyclic maintenance investment and 30 acres of replanted historic forest. It is perhaps fitting that the sunset of the 2002 PA occurred in the same year as the conclusion of the Trust’s most ambitious rehabilitation project to date: the Officers’ Club. Closed to the public for nearly five years while it underwent a comprehensive structural, functional, building systems and programmatic upgrade, the Officers’ Club reopened with great fanfare on September 23, in a ceremony highlighted by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and former Secretary of State George Shultz. Now a centerpiece venue for the enjoyment and interpretation of the Presidio, the Officers’ Club features state-of-the-art multimedia interpretive installations, a full service bar and restaurant, assembly venues, classrooms and other visitor serving amenities. Its renewed purpose is to help welcome the public to the park and introduce visitors to the Presidio’s deep and fascinating history. The venue is enriched by ambitious evening and weekend programming – all free to the public - that range from to lectures on Presidio topics, to live music, to children’s art classes. The revived Officers’ Club showcases the Trust’s best practices in historic preservation, developed over the past 16 years, as well as its ambitions for welcoming the public to the post. Other building rehabilitation highlights during 2014 include the full occupancy of building 101 (Enlisted Men’s Barracks, built 1895), with the debut of The Commissary restaurant in the former south-wing mess hall and kitchen, and the opening of the California Society of Pioneers archive and gallery in the north wing. At the Public Health Service district, the rehabilitation of long-vacant buildings 1818 and 1819 (Infectious Disease Research Lab and Offices, built 1932) as a preschool continued apace, working toward a spring 2015 opening. A two-year comprehensive cyclic maintenance program focused on the Infantry Terrace neighborhood (Officers’ Family Housing, built 1910-12) was completed, and Trust crews wrapped up an exterior stabilization program for building 2 (Post Hospital, built 1864), one of the oldest American-era structures on the post. Due to the renewal of the PA in 2014, the Trust utilized Stipulation VII of the 2002 PA through April, after which the project review process shifted to Stipulation IV of the 2014 document. For all intents and purposes, the process remains the same. The 2014 document, however, explains in a very detailed manner – via both text and a flow chart – exactly how the Trust moves a project through its internal project reviews along with how decisions are documented and disclosed. The 2014 PA also cites the Trust’s use of a combined National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) into a single review process (known as N²) in keeping with the 2013 Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) and ACHP “Handbook for Integrating NEPA and Section 106 Reviews”. The 2014 process remains supported by the same highly-experienced team of reviewers as in years past, who together represent the full scope of historic preservation practice. A complete accounting of projects reviewed under Stipulations VII and IV is included in this report as Exhibit C, and a detailed description of the process is included as Exhibit B. The N2 team that participates in the above process is comprised of nine preservation professionals that meet the Secretary of Interior’s standards for Archaeology, Historic Architecture, and Architectural History. The group of historic preservation professionals regularly involved in full N2 reviews in 2014 is composed of historical architects Rob Wallace and Chandler McCoy; historical landscape architect Michael Lamb; conservator and preservation project manager Christina Wallace; archaeologists Eric Blind, Kari Jones and Liz Clevenger; and historic compliance staff Rob Thomson and Michelle Taylor. In 2014 the Trust also hired a new ii full-time historian, Barbara Berglund, Ph.D., who will contribute to N2 reviews in the years to come. As in years past, the historic compliance staff collaborates closely with the Trust’s operations and maintenance crews, who work with the NHL’s buildings, landscapes, roads and forests on a daily basis. These crews are composed of journeymen carpenters, masons, electricians, plumbers, gardeners and foresters, many of which have been trained in preservation maintenance practice, and/or have multiple years of experience working with historic resources at the Presidio. The enclosed report documents all compliance decisions, including Appendix A, administrative and full compliance reviews. Between January 2014 and December 2014, 49 projects were reviewed by Trust preservation professionals through Stipulations VII and IV of the PA. Of these, 28 were reviewed at the administrative level and 21 at the full level of review. Undertakings reviewed include projects ranging from full building and landscape rehabilitations, exhibit installations, parking and traffic planning, and natural resource management. The Trust also continues to review a substantial number of “repetitive or low impact activities” through Appendix A of the PA. Appendix A includes actions such as cleaning, painting and cyclic repairs to buildings, replacement in-kind of deteriorated roofs, road and parking lot maintenance, mitigation or abatement of hazardous materials, and other such low impact activities. Compliance department staffing remained unchanged in 2014, with Rob Thomson continuing his role as Deputy Federal Preservation Officer, holding the responsibility for carrying out the terms of the PTPA on a day-to-day basis. Michelle Taylor remains the Trust’s Historic Compliance Coordinator, helping to administer our environmental and historic preservation review process, and acting as a liaison with our residential, building maintenance and project management teams on historic preservation issues. Michelle has also overseen the production of two historic structure reports over the course of the year, for buildings 99 (Theater, built 1939) and 105 (Enlisted Men’s Barracks, 1895). In addition to her day-to-day role supporting the agency’s NHPA and NEPA programs, Michelle serves as a point-person for the Doyle Drive monitoring and cultural resources protection efforts, and as a compliance program representative at several ongoing construction project meetings. The Presidio Archaeology Lab (PAL) executed an ambitious range of fieldwork, project support and classroom-based education in 2014, punctuated by the opening of the Officers’ Club and increased visibility of the Trust’s heritage programs. The PAL monitored lead-in-soil remediation projects around buildings on the Main Post (buildings 45 and 49), Crissy Field (637, 651 and 652), and in the Public Health Service District (1818 and 1819), as well as natural habitat restoration projects at Mountain Lake and Tennessee Hollow. Stabilization and rehabilitation projects at the Officers’ Club and building 2 also required monitoring during soil disturbing activities around the buildings’ perimeters. An Archaeological Management Assessment (AMA) was prepared for one project: the Lyon Street Reforestation III and Boundary Wall Repair, which includes work within an area identified as potentially containing Mexican-era (ca. 1830) archaeological deposits. Research in 2014 focused primarily on a new identification study at El Presidio de San Francisco, the Spanish-colonial archaeological site and a contributing area of the Presidio NHLD, and the launching of a long-term research project on Pershing Square in the Presidio’s Main Post. Fieldwork at Pershing Square revealed intact, intersecting serpentine stone foundations from the 1815 El Presidio adobe fort and deposits iii associated with the earlier, smaller Spanish fort. A new, lightweight, temporary “field station” tent helped identify the area as an archaeological project to passersby, and a team of 10 archaeology docents were trained to aid the PAL team in basic interpretation. Over 2,000 people visited the site over the course
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2016 NHPA Annual Report
    January 30, 2017 Julianne Polanco, State Historic Preservation Officer Attention: Mark Beason Office of Historic Preservation 1725 23rd Street, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95816 John Fowler, Executive Director Attention: Najah Duvall Office of Federal Agency Programs Advisory Council on Historic Preservation 401 F Street NW, Suite 308 Washington, DC 20001 Laura Joss, Regional Director Attention: Elaine Jackson-Retondo National Park Service – Pacific West Regional Office 333 Bush Street San Francisco, CA 94104 Craig Kenkel, Acting Superintendent Attention: Steve Haller Golden Gate National Recreation Area Building 201 Fort Mason San Francisco, CA 94123 Reference: 2016 Annual Report on Activities under the 2014 Presidio Trust Programmatic Agreement, the Presidio of San Francisco National Historic Landmark District, San Francisco, California Pursuant to Stipulation XIV of the Presidio Trust Programmatic Agreement (PTPA, 2014), enclosed is the 2016 Annual Report of activities conducted under that PA. In 2016, the Presidio Trust celebrated the 50th anniversary of the National Historic Preservation Act alongside the nation’s preservation community with a sense of reflection, gratitude and forward-looking purpose. We were also pleased to commemorate the centennial anniversary of the National Park Service, and thank our partners for their trailblazing role in preserving American cultural heritage here in California and beyond. Our principal activity for recognizing these milestones was to host the 41st annual California Preservation Foundation conference at the Presidio in April. At the conference we were enormously proud to be recognized by CPF president Kelly Sutherlin McLeod as “perhaps the biggest preservation success story of the 20th century”, praise that would not be possible without the contributions of our partner agencies, tenants and park users.
    [Show full text]
  • Contra Costa County
    Historical Distribution and Current Status of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California Robert A. Leidy, Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA Gordon S. Becker, Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA Brett N. Harvey, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA This report should be cited as: Leidy, R.A., G.S. Becker, B.N. Harvey. 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration CONTRA COSTA COUNTY Marsh Creek Watershed Marsh Creek flows approximately 30 miles from the eastern slopes of Mt. Diablo to Suisun Bay in the northern San Francisco Estuary. Its watershed consists of about 100 square miles. The headwaters of Marsh Creek consist of numerous small, intermittent and perennial tributaries within the Black Hills. The creek drains to the northwest before abruptly turning east near Marsh Creek Springs. From Marsh Creek Springs, Marsh Creek flows in an easterly direction entering Marsh Creek Reservoir, constructed in the 1960s. The creek is largely channelized in the lower watershed, and includes a drop structure near the city of Brentwood that appears to be a complete passage barrier. Marsh Creek enters the Big Break area of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta northeast of the city of Oakley. Marsh Creek No salmonids were observed by DFG during an April 1942 visual survey of Marsh Creek at two locations: 0.25 miles upstream from the mouth in a tidal reach, and in close proximity to a bridge four miles east of Byron (Curtis 1942).
    [Show full text]
  • East Bay Regional Park District 2005 Budget
    EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT 2005 BUDGET January 1 to December 31, 2005 2005 Adopted Budget Page 1 East Bay Regional Park District Page Intentionally Left Blank 2005 Adopted Budget Page 2 East Bay Regional Park District TABLE OF CONTENTS VISION AND MISSION STATEMENTS .......................................................................... 7 EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT MAP .............................................................. 9 HOW TO USE THIS BOOK............................................................................................ 11 SECTION A – GENERAL MANAGER’S MESSAGE..................................................... 13 SECTION B – BUDGET OVERVIEW ............................................................................ 21 BUDGET AT-A-GLANCE .................................................................................... 29 TOTAL RESOURCES BY CATEGORY AND MAJOR CHANGES ..................... 30 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS BY CATEGORY AND MAJOR CHANGES ............ 34 BUDGET BY FUND ............................................................................................ 37 BUDGET BY DIVISION AND DEPARTMENT .................................................... 38 AUTHORIZATION POSITIONS BY DIVISION AND DEPARTMENT ................. 40 GENERAL FUND ................................................................................................ 41 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS ............................................................................. 47 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wildcat Creek Restoration Action Plan Version 1.3 April 26, 2010 Prepared by the URBAN CREEKS COUNCIL for the WILDCAT-SAN PABLO WATERSHED COUNCIL
    wildcat creek restoration action plan version 1.3 April 26, 2010 prepared by THE URBAN CREEKS COUNCIL for the WILDCAT-SAN PABLO WATERSHED COUNCIL Adopted by the City of San Pablo on August 3, 2010 wildcat creek restoration action plan table of contents 1. INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 plan obJectives 5 1.2 scope 6 Urban Urban 1.5 Methods 8 1.5 Metadata c 10 reeks 2. WATERSHED OVERVIEW 12 c 2.1 introdUction o 12 U 2.2 watershed land Use ncil 13 2.3 iMpacts of Urbanized watersheds 17 april 2.4 hydrology 19 2.5 sediMent transport 22 2010 2.6 water qUality 24 2.7 habitat 26 2.8 flood ManageMent on lower wildcat creek 29 2.9 coMMUnity 32 3. PROJECT AREA ANALYSIS 37 3.1 overview 37 3.2 flooding 37 3.4 in-streaM conditions 51 3.5 sUMMer fish habitat 53 3.6 bioassessMent 57 4. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS 58 4.1 obJectives, findings and strategies 58 4.2 recoMMended actions according to strategy 61 4.3 streaM restoration recoMMendations by reach 69 4.4 recoMMended actions for phase one reaches 73 t 4.5 phase one flood daMage redUction reach 73 able of 4.6 recoMMended actions for watershed coUncil 74 c ontents version 1.3 april 26, 2010 2 wildcat creek restoration action plan Urban creeks coUncil april 2010 table of contents 3 figUre 1-1: wildcat watershed overview to Point Pinole Regional Shoreline wildcat watershed existing trail wildcat creek highway railroad city of san pablo planned trail other creek arterial road bart Parkway SAN PABLO Richmond BAY Avenue San Pablo Point UP RR San Pablo WEST COUNTY BNSF RR CITY OF LANDFILL NORTH SAN PABLO RICHMOND San Pablo
    [Show full text]
  • REQUEST for QUALIFICATIONS and PROPOSALS Notice of Development Opportunity Historic Anitas Building: 920 Macdonald Ave
    REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS AND PROPOSALS Notice of Development Opportunity Historic Anitas Building: 920 Macdonald Ave. Macdonald Ave. and 11th St. - 1940’s Source: Online Archive of California City of Richmond, California Issued by the City of Richmond, CA City Manager’s Office, Development Services Submission Deadline: May 3, 2019 at 12:00 PM (PDT) City of Richmond, CA REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS AND PROPOSALS Notice of Development Opportunity 920 Macdonald Ave. City of Richmond, California City Council Mayor Tom Butt Vice Mayor Melvin Willis Councilmember Nathaniel Bates Councilmember Ben Choi Councilmember Eduardo Martinez Councilmember Jael Myrick Councilmember Demnlus Johnson III City Manager Carlos Martinez City Manager Bill Lindsay Stay updated on all Richmond Opportunity Sites: http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/OpportunitySites Request for Qualifications/Request for Proposals: 920 Macdonald Ave. 2 City of Richmond, CA Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................... 4 II. NEIGHBORHOOD & COMMUNITY ASSETS............................. 6 III. SITE VISION...................................................................................... 21 IV. SITE AND PARCEL SUMMARY...................................................... 23 V. DEVELOPMENT TEAM SELECTION............................................ 29 VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS..................................................... 30 VII. SELECTION CRITERIA, PROCESS & SCHEDULE.................. 33 VIII. CITY NON-LIABILITY & RELATED MATTERS....................
    [Show full text]
  • E a St Shor E Pa R K Proj Ec T Gen Er a L Pl
    PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT EASTSHORE PARK PROJECT GENERAL PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT STATE CLEARINGHOUSE # 2002022051 July 2002 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT EASTSHORE PARK PROJECT GENERAL PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT STATE CLEARINGHOUSE # 2002022051 Gray Davis Governor Mary D. Nichols Secretary for Resources Ruth Coleman Acting Director of Parks and Recreation P.O.Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 July 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT SUMMARY ............................................................................ 1 A. PURPOSE OF THE EIR........................................................................................................ 1 B. PROPOSED PROJECT ......................................................................................................... 2 C. PLANNING PROCESS......................................................................................................... 4 D. EIR SCOPE............................................................................................................................ 5 E. SUMMARY........................................................................................................................... 5 F. REPORT ORGANIZATION................................................................................................. 7 II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION............................................................................................................... 9 A. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT Vision and Mission Statements
    EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT Vision and Mission Statements Vision The East Bay Regional Park District will preserve a priceless heritage of natural and cultural resources, open space, parks and trails for the future and will set aside park areas for the enjoyment and healthful recreation for generations to come. An environmental ethic guides us in all that we do. Mission The East Bay Regional Park District will achieve the above vision in the following ways: • Provide a diversified system of regional parklands, trails, and parkland-related services that will offer outstanding opportunities for creative use of outdoor time. • Acquire and preserve significant biologic, geologic, scenic, and historic resources within Alameda and Contra Costa Counties. • Manage, maintain and restore the parklands so that they retain their important scenic, natural, and cultural values. • Interpret the parklands by focusing educational programs on both the visitor’s relationship to nature, natural processes, ecology, history of the parklands, and the value of natural conditions. • Support the development and retention of well-trained, dedicated, and productive employees. • Improve access to and use of the parks by members of groups that have been underrepresented, such as disabled, economically disadvantaged, and elderly visitors. • Balance environmental concerns and outdoor recreational opportunities within regional parklands. • Provide recreational development that fosters appropriate use of parklands while preserving their remoteness and intrinsic value. • Create quality programs that recognize the cultural diversity represented in the region. • Participate in partnerships with public agencies, nonprofit organizations, volunteers, and the private sector to achieve mutual goals. • Provide leadership to help guide land use decisions of East Bay governments that relate to the District.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resources Richmond General Plan 2030 Community Vision Richmond, California in 2030
    14 Historic Resources Richmond General Plan 2030 Community Vision Richmond, California in 2030 Richmond showcases its abundant, well-preserved historic and cultural resources. The City’s history and social development is evident through its many interpretive features, historically-themed public art and surviving structures and landscapes. These character- defining resources contribute to the overall beauty and economic vitality of the City. Downtown, Point Richmond and the National Historical Park are a source of creativity and cultural reference. These areas, as well as other culturally significant activity hubs, have catalyzed further development and increased business activity and cultural tourism in Richmond. Rehabilitation and adaptive reuse projects enhance historic character while still meeting the contemporary needs of the community. New development responds to the character of historic surroundings with compatible site design, massing and complementary design details. Public outreach among residents and visitors has heightened awareness of Richmond’s pivotal role in involving women in the home front workforce, major contributions to the war effort and other important local history. Residents and visitors of all ages enjoy fes- tivals, community events and performances that trace the fascinating people who have helped shape Richmond today. 14 Historical Resources Richmond’s historic resources are woven throughout • Reviews the existing regulatory framework that the fabric of the City and offer a window into the guides historic resource planning efforts. community’s rich and colorful past. They provide tangible reminders of a past that includes the origi- Purpose of the Element nal indigenous inhabitants, early Spanish explorers Richmond’s historic resources provide an important and settlers and the American pioneers and city connection to the past, shaping the community’s builders.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional in Nature March - April 2012 East Bay Regional Park District Activity Guide
    Regional in Nature March - April 2012 East Bay Regional Park District Activity Guide www.ebparks.org Spring is wildfl ower season in the parks. A fi eld of owl’s clover covers Round Valley Regional Preserve near Brentwood. Look Photo: Mark Crumpler Crumpler Mark Photo: inside for guided wildfl ower hikes in the Regional Parks. Inside: Junior Lifeguards • page 4 Park’n It Summer Day Camp • page 5 Pole Walking • page 6 Fire Making and Cord Making at Coyote Hills • page 11 Kayaking Big Break • page 14 Tips for Choosing a Summer Day Camp, see page 2. Contents Aquatics/Jr. Lifeguards .........4 Signifi cant Addition to Wildcat Recreation Programs ...... 5-6 Ardenwood ................. 6-7, 10 Canyon Regional Park Black Diamond ...............7, 10 BY GENERAL MANAGER ROBERT E. DOYLE Botanic Garden ..................10 Wildcat Canyon Regional Park, with Like adjacent Wildcat Canyon, this passed by voters in 2008 to help Coyote Hills ...................10-11 its majestic hills, ridges, and peaks, is recently acquired land contains secure open space. We are fortunate Crab Cove ......................11-12 growing. The East Bay Regional Park a mix of oak woodlands and grassland to have these funds at this time so we District Board of Directors recently providing a natural habitat to precious can act quickly to make bargain land Sunol ..................................... 12 approved the purchase of 362 acres wildlife. At Park District staff purchases. We are also fortunate Tilden Nature Area ...........12 adjacent to Wildcat Canyon, making it recommendation, much of the to work with a number of partner the largest parcel acquired by the Park property will be held in land bank agencies with similar visions to make Other Regional Parks ...12-14 District in west Contra Costa County status until it can be made safe our Regional Park system the fi nest Volunteer Programs ..........14 in 35 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Finance Board Workshop EXHIBITS
    Capital Finance Board Workshop EXHIBITS April 27, 2018 Exhibit List 2018 Board Capital Finance Workshop April 27, 2018 Pages 1 through 42, the Capital Finance Board Workshop Memo, can be found on the District’s website at: http://www.ebparks.org/meetings EXHIBIT LIST 1a: GRANTS AA – WW Acquisition Funding ........................................................................................ 43 1b: GRANTS AA – WW Development Funding .................................................................................... 53 2a: Active Projects – 2018 Budget ............................................................................................................. 71 2b: 2018 Active Projects by Department .................................................................................................. 87 3: Measure CC Status Report ................................................................................................................... 89 4a: Measure AA Unappropriated Funds .................................................................................................. 111 4b: Measure AA Consolidated Funds ....................................................................................................... 113 5a: Measure WW Appropriations as of April 5, 2018 ......................................................................... 115 5b: Measure WW Remaining Balances, Sorted by Park ...................................................................... 125 5c: Measure WW Status Report as of April 5, 2018 ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • I I I I I I I I I I I I I
    I I City of San Pablo General Plan I neighborhood parks and facilities Identification of and planning for the needs of special user groups such as children the Citys multicultural population the disabled and the elderly in park and recreation facility I development Identification of potential New facilities in North Richmond are an of I linkages and access between example a in this case Stores City park and recreation corporatecommunity partnership Lucky facilities and open space I areas such as creeks urban open space and nearby regional park facilities Cooperative agreements with WCCC School District and Contra Costa College I Development of an action plan to as identified in accompanying actions prioritize the Citys needs identify and preferred sites for new facilities and I recreation programs identify staffing A planning and improvement approach needs plan for acquisition and for Davis Park Davis Park Master Plan improvements and the establishment of Action 4H I a schedule for acquisition development and maintenance of existing and future Action CF 4B facilities School District Partnership I Actively pursue cooperative efforts with the West Development of an aggressive financing Contra Costa Unified School District to develop strategy for park and recreational jointuse neighborhood park facilities as part of I facilities including the aggressive pursuit or adjacent to schools Discussions should of grant funding include the coordination of recreational programs and community programs from within I the existing facilities and working
    [Show full text]
  • Board Meeting Packet Friday, November 6, 2020
    Board of Directors Board Meeting Packet Friday, November 6, 2020 SPECIAL NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AT THE EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING SCHEDULED FOR FRIDAY, November 6, 2020 at 11:00 AM Pursuant to Governor Newsom’s Executive Order No. N-29-20 and the Alameda County Health Officer’s Shelter in Place Orders, the East Bay Regional Park District Headquarters will not be open to the public and the Board of Directors and staff will be participating in the Board meetings via phone/video conferencing. Members of the public can listen and view the meeting in the following way: Via the Park District’s live video stream which can be found at: https://youtu.be/ac97WleuZvM Public comments may be submitted one of three ways: 1. Via email to Yolande Barial Knight, Clerk of the Board, at [email protected]. Email must contain in the subject line public comments – not on the agenda or public comments – agenda item #. It is preferred that these written comments be submitted by Thursday, November 5, 2020 at 3:00 pm. 2. Via voicemail at (510) 544-2016. The caller must start the message by stating public comments – not on the agenda or public comments – agenda item # followed by their name and place of residence, followed by their comments. It is preferred that these voicemail comments be submitted by Thursday, November 5, 2020 at 3:00 pm. 3. Live via zoom. If you would like to make a live public comment during the meeting this option is available through the virtual meeting platform: https://zoom.us/j/98646766885 * Note that this virtual meeting platform link will let you into the virtual meeting for the purpose of providing a public comment.
    [Show full text]