A Global Quest

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Global Quest 5 AMERICA AEROSPACE May 2012 MAY 2012 MAY Human space exploration A GLOBAL QUEST Snaring a piece of the sky Hypersonic transport…30 years and holding A PUBLICATION OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF AERONAUTICS AND ASTRONAUTICS AA-layout-SPACE0111_Layout 1 4/10/12 12:23 PM Page 2 Soyuz and Long March set the pace THE LAUNCH SERVICES INDUSTRY CON- Russia’s Proton, Europe’s Ariane 5, the have emerged as the most prolific tinued to grow last year, posting 79 at- U.S. Atlas V, the Ukraine’s Zenit, the space launch programs in the world, by tempted orbital launch missions. That U.S. Delta IV and Delta II, Japan’s far. Together they account for 34% of all total surpassed the 75 missions in each H-2, the U.S. Minotaur and space shut- the launches attempted during the past of the previous two years and repre- tle, and India’s PSLV. By contrast, the three years; we project that this domi- sents more launches than at any time 12 most active vehicles accounted for nance will continue—and probably ex- since 2000, when 87 were attempted. 88% of all attempted launches in each pand—for the foreseeable future. But although the number of launches of 2009 and 2010. increased, there was far less diversity The rising trend in launch activity Commercial expansion for Soyuz in terms of the rockets used. In 2009 concentration is apparent for the three While Soyuz has consistently ranked and again in 2010, 21 different launch most active rockets, which accounted among the leading rockets for dec- vehicle models were employed, com- for 40% of all launches in 2009, 52% in ades, most of its business traditionally pared to only 18 in 2011. 2010, and 53% in 2011. But it is partic- has focused on launching civil satel- [Note that for the sake of simplic- ularly noticeable for the two most ac- lites and capsules for the Rosaviakos- ity, we count all the Long March mod- tive vehicles, which accounted for mos, the Russian space agency, or mil- els as one and break out the Zenits 29% of launches in 2009, 36% in 2010, itary satellites for Russia’s ministry of into either land-launched or sea- and 44% in 2011. defense. This started to change dra- launched models.] It is clear that the top two rockets matically in 1999, when the Soyuz be- In other words, last year’s launch are increasingly driving the launch ser- gan to be used for launching Global- activities were slightly more concen- vices market. In 2009, it was Soyuz star mobile communications satellites trated, with 92% of all launches under- and Proton. In 2010 and again last to LEO. That year, seven Soyuz vehi- taken by the 12 most active rockets— year it was Long March and Soyuz. cles successfully launched Globalstar Russia’s Soyuz, China’s Long March, In short, Soyuz and Long March satellites, in batches of five. Over the past decade, Soyuz has been used most often to launch Soyuz manned crew transport capsules to the ISS and Progress unmanned resupply capsules—increasingly so, given the drawdown of the space shuttle pro- gram. During this time, however, Ari- anespace has invested in helping to develop the Soyuz 2.1a and 2.1b and in marketing them commercially. In 2010, Soyuz was again being used to launch Globalstars. On October 19 of that year, a Soyuz 2.1a successfully launched six Globalstars from Tyura- tam, Kazakhstan. On July 16, 2011, a 2.1a launched six Globalstars, this time from Ariane- space’s main launch facilities at Kou- rou, French Guiana. The first Soyuz 2.1b from Kourou followed on Octo- ber 21. That mission carried two Gal- ileo navigation satellites for ESA. On December 17, another 2.1a lifted off from Kourou, carrying small French and Chilean imaging satellites, fol- lowed by a 2.1a with six Globalstars Soyuz (left) and Long March are increasingly driving the launch services market. from Tyuratam. 26 AEROSPACE AMERICA/MAY 2012 AA-layout-SPACE0111_Layout 1 4/10/12 12:23 PM Page 3 and the advantage of three different launch sites (Plesetsk, Tyuratam, and Kourou), Soyuz’s growth potential is considerable. The only launch vehicle program that stands to outpace Soyuz is China Great Wall Industry’s Long March, which consists of just under a dozen rocket models that are either active or under development. Rapid rise of Long March Although not a major player in the commercial market, Long March has been one of the most successful launch vehicle programs during the past five years. Throughout much of its history, it averaged no more than two to three missions per year. However, Long March launch rates began growing to four to five missions annually over the past decade, as China’s national space program no- ticeably expanded and built many The Soyuz lifts off on its inaugural flight from the spaceport in French Guiana. more spacecraft. These included com- munications and scientific satellites, Between Arianespace’s investment hard to recall the last time any rocket exploratory probes, and capsules, to- in and commercial marketing of Soyuz posted 19 or more launches, but the gether with the first series of demon- and the readiness of the Globalstar feat has certainly not been matched stration Beidou navigation satellites. program to use the vehicle for launch- this century. You might have to go The Chinese government also be- ing most of its satellites, Soyuz has back to the early 1990s or 1980s to the gan making a greater effort to market grown to become the industry’s most days of the Soviet Union. commercially successful medium-sized While more than 80% of Soyuz launch vehicle. It thoroughly domi- launches were for the Russian govern- nates the medium-lift segment of the ment last year, there is a trend toward market, especially now that Boeing’s more commercial customers, such as Delta II is so overpriced (more than Globalstar. About 40% of the satellites $100 million per mission) that it is es- launched by Soyuz rockets last year sentially uncompetitive. were commercial, including the two Soyuz’s growing commercial busi- Galileos. A few Soyuz launchers have ness—along with its already substantial already been contracted by ESA to civil and military activity—accounts for carry Galileo satellites, as well as by the vehicle’s 19 launches in 2011. It is O3b Networks for its constellation of eight broadband communications LAUNCH MISSIONS BY MONTH satellites at medium Earth orbit. January 4 We expect Soyuz to maintain its February 5 near monopoly of the medium-lift March 3 launch market for the foreseeable fu- April 6 ture. The only U.S. rockets that may May 5 eventually provide some competition June 7 are Space Exploration Technologies’ July 8 August 7 medium to heavy Falcon 9 and Orbital September 7 Sciences’ medium Antares (formerly October 9 known as Taurus II). November 9 With a diverse customer base, the The Falcon 9, along with the Antares, may be December 9 marketing prowess of Arianespace, the only U.S. competition for the Soyuz. AEROSPACE AMERICA/MAY 2012 27 AA-layout-SPACE0111_Layout 1 4/10/12 12:23 PM Page 4 LAUNCH MISSIONS BY VEHICLE Tianlian 1-1 was a civil data relay Soyuz 19 spacecraft and the Tansuo 3 (Shiyan 3) Long March 16 and BX-1 were scientific technology Proton 7 development satellites. Shenzhou 7 Ariane 5 5 was a manned space capsule—the first Atlas V 5 manned mission for the Shenzhou Zenit 4 program and the first to feature a Delta IV 3 spacewalk by a Chinese taikonaut. Delta II 3 The remaining nine satellites H-2 3 Minotaur 3 launched by Long Marches that year were for Earth observation. At least Space shuttle 3 China has begun launching commercial satellites, PSLV 2 four of those—Shijian 6E, Shijian 6F, including the Venesat 1, for foreign customers. Dnepr 1 Yaogan 4, and Yaogan 5—were de- GSLV 1 signed for military imaging missions. launched five military imaging satel- Rockot 1 Three were disaster monitoring satel- lites—three more Yaogans and the Safir 1 lites—Chuangxin 1-2, Huan Jing 1, and Tianhu 1. Sea Launch Zenit 1 Huan Jing 2. And two were meteoro- In addition, these rockets launched Taurus 1 logical—Feng Yun 3A and 2E. three Shijian scientific satellites, the The four Long March launches in Chaang’e-2 Moon probe, the Feng Long March commercially to other 2009 suggested that the previous year’s Yun 3B meteorological satellite, and countries with which it had developed record number of flights might have the Zhongxing 20A military communi- closer political and economic ties—na- been an anomaly, but that thought cations satellite. tions such as Venezuela and Nigeria. was quickly put to rest in 2010 when Had Soyuz not had such an unusu- During 2007-2008, Long March rockets the program successfully carried out a ally stellar year in 2011, Long March lofted Nigcomsat 1 and Simon Bolivar total of 15 missions. In fact, the slow- would have led the world in number 1 (Venesat 1) communications satel- down was due to an extremely un- of launches for the second consecu- lites for Nigerian Communication Sat- usual failure (the first in 13 years) by a tive year, with a total of 16—although ellite and the Venezuelan Ministry of Long March on August 31, 2009. one of those (on August 18) was a fail- Science and Technology, respectively. The problem was attributed to a ure. The program continued to benefit But by 2008, a much more diverse malfunction of the CZ-3B’s third stage, from a full manifest of Chinese civil and ambitious Chinese space program caused by a burnthrough of one of the and military satellites, including three and some initial success at marketing stage’s YF-75 engine gas generators.
Recommended publications
  • Magisterarbeit
    MAGISTERARBEIT Titel der Magisterarbeit „How does China’s space program fit their development goals?“ Verfasser Manfred Steinkellner, Bakk. phil. angestrebter akademischer Grad Magister der Philosophie (Mag.phil.) Innsbruck, Juni 2009 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt: A 066 811 Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt: Sinologie Betreuer: Prof. Dr. Rüdiger Frank, Prof. Dr. Susanne Weigelin-Schwiedrzik Zusammenfassung Diese Diplomarbeit befasst sich mit dem chinesischen Weltraumprogramm und seiner Rolle im Kontext der chinesischen Entwicklungspolitik. Die Bedeutung ist einerseits durch Chinas wirtschaftlichen Aufstieg gegeben und andererseits durch das erhöhte strategische und kommerzielle Interesse am Weltraum. Der erste Teil dieser Arbeit versucht kurz den Weg Chinas zu seiner aktuellen Lage zu skizzieren. Die wichtigsten Entwicklungsschritte in Wirtschaft, Militär und Umwelt werden aufgezeigt um ein besseres Verständnis der Realität zu ermöglichen. Nach einer kurzen Analyse der aktuellen Situation werden die chinesischen Entwicklungspläne untersucht. Das Hauptaugenmerk liegt auf dem elften chinesischen Fünf-Jahres Plan, dem elften chinesischen Entwicklungsplan für Weltraum sowie dem Langzeit Entwicklungsplan für Wissenschaft und Technik. Die Analyse dieser Daten führt zu einem konkreteren Verständnis der aktuellen Ziele Chinas und ermöglicht somit eine Einordnung des Weltraumprogramms in die aktuelle chinesische Entwicklung. Der zweite Teil untersucht sechs Kernbereiche des chinesischen Weltraumprogramms. Es handelt sich dabei um das bemannte
    [Show full text]
  • Spotlight on Asia-Pacific
    Worldwide Satellite Magazine June 2008 SatMagazine Spotlight On Asia-Pacific * The Asia-Pacific Satellite Market Segment * Expert analysis: Tara Giunta, Chris Forrester, Futron, Euroconsult, NSR and more... * Satellite Imagery — The Second Look * Diving Into the Beijing Olympics * Executive Spotlight, Andrew Jordan * The Pros Speak — Mark Dankburg, Bob Potter, Adrian Ballintine... * Checking Out CommunicAsia + O&GC3 * Thuraya-3 In Focus SATMAGAZINE JUNE 2008 CONTENTS COVER FEATURE EXE C UTIVE SPOTLIGHT The Asia-Pacific Satellite Market Andrew Jordan by Hartley & Pattie Lesser President & CEO The opportunities, and challenges, SAT-GE facing the Asia-Pacific satellite market 12 are enormous 42 FEATURES INSIGHT Let The Games Begin... High Stakes Patent Litigation by Silvano Payne, Hartley & Pattie by Tara Giunta, Robert M. Masters, Lesser, and Kevin and Michael Fleck and Erin Sears The Beijing Olympic Games are ex- Like it or not, high stakes patent pected to find some 800,000 visitors wars are waging in the global satel- 47 arriving in town for the 17-day event. 04 lite sector, and it is safe to assume that they are here to stay. Transforming Satel- TBS: Looking At Further Diversification lite Broadband by Chris Forrester by Mark Dankberg Internationally, Turner Broadcasting The first time the “radical” concept has always walked hand-in-hand with 54 of a 100 Gbps satellite was intro- the growth of satellite and cable – duced was four years ago, 07 and now IPTV. Here’s Looking At Everything — Part II by Hartley & Pattie Lesser The Key To DTH Success In Asia by Jose del Rosario The Geostationary Operational Envi- Some are eyeing Asia as a haven for ronmental Satellites (GOES) continu- economic safety or even economic ously track evolution of weather over growth amidst the current global almost a hemisphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Geosynchronous Objects
    esoc European Space Operations Centre Robert-Bosch-Strasse 5 D-64293 Darmstadt Germany T +49 (0)6151 900 www.esa.int CLASSIFICATION OF GEOSYNCHRONOUS OBJECTS Produced with the DISCOS Database Prepared by T. Flohrer & S. Frey Reference GEN-DB-LOG-00195-OPS-GR Issue 18 Revision 0 Date of Issue 3 June 2016 Status ISSUED Document Type TN European Space Agency Agence spatiale europeenne´ Abstract This is a status report on geosynchronous objects as of 1 January 2016. Based on orbital data in ESA’s DISCOS database and on orbital data provided by KIAM the situation near the geostationary ring is analysed. From 1434 objects for which orbital data are available (of which 2 are outdated, i.e. the last available state dates back to 180 or more days before the reference date), 471 are actively controlled, 747 are drifting above, below or through GEO, 190 are in a libration orbit and 15 are in a highly inclined orbit. For 11 objects the status could not be determined. Furthermore, there are 50 uncontrolled objects without orbital data (of which 44 have not been cata- logued). Thus the total number of known objects in the geostationary region is 1484. In issue 18 the previously used definition of ”near the geostationary ring” has been slightly adapted. If you detect any error or if you have any comment or question please contact: Tim Flohrer, PhD European Space Agency European Space Operations Center Space Debris Office (OPS-GR) Robert-Bosch-Str. 5 64293 Darmstadt, Germany Tel.: +49-6151-903058 E-mail: tim.fl[email protected] Page 1 / 178 European Space Agency CLASSIFICATION OF GEOSYNCHRONOUS OBJECTS Agence spatiale europeenne´ Date 3 June 2016 Issue 18 Rev 0 Table of contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Sources 4 2.1 USSTRATCOM Two-Line Elements (TLEs) .
    [Show full text]
  • Cronología De Lanzamientos Espaciales 1
    Cronología de lanzamientos espaciales 1 Cronología de Lanzamientos Espaciales Año 2008 Copyright © 2008 by Eladio Miranda Batlle. All rights reserved. Los textos, imágenes y tablas que se encuentran en esta cronología cuentan con la autorización de sus propietarios para ser publicadas o se hace referencia a la fuente de donde se obtuvieron los mismos. Eladio Miranda Batlle [email protected] Cronología de lanzamientos espaciales 2 Contenido 2008 Enero Thuraya 3 TecSAR 1 Express AM-33 Febrero Progress M-63 STS – 122 (ATLANTIS) COF (Columbus) Thor 2R Kizuna (WINDS) Marzo Jules Verne ATV-1 STS - 123 (Endeavour) JPL (JEM-ELM-PS) USA 200 AMC 14 Navstar – 2RM 6 DirecTV 11 SAR Lupe 4 Abril Soyuz TM-12 ICO G1 C/NOFS Star One C2-VINASAT 1 Tianlian 1 GIOVE-B AAUSAT 2 Amos 3 IMS 1-CanX 2- CanX 6 -Delfi-C3-Rubin 8 AIS-SEEDS 2 CartoSat 2A COMPASS 1 - CUTE-1.7 Mayo Progress M-64 TWINS 2 Galaxy 18 Cosmos 2437-2438-2439-Yubileiny Fengyun 3A STS-124 (Discovery) JPM-PM,Kibo Eladio Miranda Batlle [email protected] Cronología de lanzamientos espaciales 3 Junio Zhongxing 9 Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope- GLAST Skynet 5C- Turksat 3A Orbcomm FM- 37- 38 -39- 40- 41- CDS3 Jason 2 Cosmos 2440 (US-KMO-1) Julio Bard 6-Protostar 1 Echostar 11 SAR Lupe 5 Cosmos 2441(Persona -1) Agosto Traiblazer – PreSat – Nanosail D – Celestis 07 Superbird 7 Inmarsat 4-F3 RapidEye-A-B-C-D-E Septiembre Huan Jing 1A-1B GeoEye1 Progress M-65 Nimiq 4 Galaxy 19 Glonass 724-725-726(Kosmos 2442-2443-2444 Shenzhou 7 Demosat/Falcon 1 Octubre THEOS Soyuz TMA-13 IBEX Chandrayan 1 Shi Jian 6 (SJ 6A-6B) COSMO-Skymed (3 ) VENESAT 1 (Simón Bolivar 1) Noviembre SY 3 (TS 1, 2, 3) CX-1(2) (Chuang Xin 1) Astra 1M Kosmos 2445.
    [Show full text]
  • China Dream, Space Dream: China's Progress in Space Technologies and Implications for the United States
    China Dream, Space Dream 中国梦,航天梦China’s Progress in Space Technologies and Implications for the United States A report prepared for the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Kevin Pollpeter Eric Anderson Jordan Wilson Fan Yang Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank Dr. Patrick Besha and Dr. Scott Pace for reviewing a previous draft of this report. They would also like to thank Lynne Bush and Bret Silvis for their master editing skills. Of course, any errors or omissions are the fault of authors. Disclaimer: This research report was prepared at the request of the Commission to support its deliberations. Posting of the report to the Commission's website is intended to promote greater public understanding of the issues addressed by the Commission in its ongoing assessment of U.S.-China economic relations and their implications for U.S. security, as mandated by Public Law 106-398 and Public Law 108-7. However, it does not necessarily imply an endorsement by the Commission or any individual Commissioner of the views or conclusions expressed in this commissioned research report. CONTENTS Acronyms ......................................................................................................................................... i Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... iii Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1
    [Show full text]
  • Space Security 2006
    SPACE SECURITY 2006 SPACESECURITY.ORG SPACE SECURITY 2006 SPACESECURITY.ORG PARTNERS Governance Group Simon Collard-Wexler International Security Research and Outreach Programme, Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, Canada Amb. Thomas Graham Jr. Cypress Fund for Peace and Security Dr. Wade Huntley Simons Centre for Disarmament and Non-proliferation Research, University of British Columbia Dr. Ram Jakhu Institute of Air and Space Law, McGill University Dr. William Marshall Belfer Centre for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University and Space Policy Institute, George Washington University John Siebert Project Ploughshares Sarah Estabrooks Project Manager, Project Ploughshares Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publications Data Advisory Board Space Security 2006 Amb. Thomas Graham Jr. (Chairman of the Board), Cypress Fund for Peace and Security ISBN 13: 978-1-895722-53-6 Philip Coyle III ISBN 10: 1-895722-53-5 Center for Defense Information Air Marshall Lord Garden © 2006 Spacesecurity.org House of Lords, UK Design and layout by Graphics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada Theresa Hitchens Center for Defense Information Cover image: ESA-J.Huart Dr. John Logsdon Space Policy Institute, George Washington University Printed in Canada Dr. Lucy Stojak Institute of Air and Space Law, McGill University First published July 2006 Dr. S. Pete Worden Brigadier General USAF (ret.) TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 8 Acronyms PAGE 11 Introduction PAGE 13 Executive Summary PAGE 26 Chapter One: The Space Environment
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Geosynchrono
    ESA UNCLASSIFIED - Limited Distribution ! esoc European Space Operations Centre Robert-Bosch-Strasse 5 D-64293 Darmstadt Germany T +49 (0)6151 900 F +31 (0)6151 90495 www.esa.int TECHNICAL NOTE Classification of Geosynchronous objects. Prepared by ESA Space Debris Office Reference GEN-DB-LOG-00270-OPS-SD Issue/Revision 21.0 Date of Issue 19 July 2019 Status Issued ESA UNCLASSIFIED - Limited Distribution ! Page 2/234 Classification of Geosynchronous objects. Issue Date 19 July 2019 Ref GEN-DB-LOG-00270-OPS-SD ESA UNCLASSIFIED - Limited Distribution ! Abstract This is a status report on (near) geosynchronous objects as of 1 January 2019. Based on orbital data in ESA’s DISCOS database and on orbital data provided by KIAM the situation near the geostationary ring is analysed. From 1578 objects for which orbital data are available (of which 14 are outdated, i.e. the last available state dates back to 180 or more days before the reference date), 529 are actively controlled, 831 are drifting above, below or through GEO, 195 are in a libration orbit and 21 are in a highly inclined orbit. For 2 object the status could not be determined. Furthermore, there are 60 uncontrolled objects without orbital data (of which 55 have not been catalogued). Thus the total number of known objects in the geostationary region is 1638. Finally, there are 130 rocket bodies crossing GEO. If you detect any error or if you have any comment or question please contact: Stijn Lemmens European Space Agency European Space Operations Center Space Debris Office (OPS-GR) Robert-Bosch-Str.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Astronomia Nova
    Index of Astronomia Nova Index of Astronomia Nova. M. Capderou, Handbook of Satellite Orbits: From Kepler to GPS, 883 DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-03416-4, © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 Bibliography Books are classified in sections according to the main themes covered in this work, and arranged chronologically within each section. General Mechanics and Geodesy 1. H. Goldstein. Classical Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, Mass., 1956 2. L. Landau & E. Lifchitz. Mechanics (Course of Theoretical Physics),Vol.1, Mir, Moscow, 1966, Butterworth–Heinemann 3rd edn., 1976 3. W.M. Kaula. Theory of Satellite Geodesy, Blaisdell Publ., Waltham, Mass., 1966 4. J.-J. Levallois. G´eod´esie g´en´erale, Vols. 1, 2, 3, Eyrolles, Paris, 1969, 1970 5. J.-J. Levallois & J. Kovalevsky. G´eod´esie g´en´erale,Vol.4:G´eod´esie spatiale, Eyrolles, Paris, 1970 6. G. Bomford. Geodesy, 4th edn., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1980 7. J.-C. Husson, A. Cazenave, J.-F. Minster (Eds.). Internal Geophysics and Space, CNES/Cepadues-Editions, Toulouse, 1985 8. V.I. Arnold. Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, Graduate Texts in Mathematics (60), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989 9. W. Torge. Geodesy, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1991 10. G. Seeber. Satellite Geodesy, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1993 11. E.W. Grafarend, F.W. Krumm, V.S. Schwarze (Eds.). Geodesy: The Challenge of the 3rd Millennium, Springer, Berlin, 2003 12. H. Stephani. Relativity: An Introduction to Special and General Relativity,Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004 13. G. Schubert (Ed.). Treatise on Geodephysics,Vol.3:Geodesy, Elsevier, Oxford, 2007 14. D.D. McCarthy, P.K.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts
    Federal Aviation Administration 2013 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts May 2013 FAA Commercial Space Transportation (AST) and the Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) • i • 2013 Commercial Space Transportation Forecasts About the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 51 United States Code, Subtitle V, Chapter 509 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA AST’s website: http://www.faa.gov/go/ast Cover: The Orbital Sciences Corporation’s Antares rocket is seen as it launches from Pad-0A of the Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport at the NASA Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia, Sunday, April 21, 2013. Image Credit: NASA/Bill Ingalls NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. • i • Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY . 1 COMSTAC 2013 COMMERCIAL GEOSYNCHRONOUS ORBIT LAUNCH DEMAND FORECAST .
    [Show full text]
  • Name NORAD ID Int'l Code Launch Date Period [Minutes] Longitude LES 9 MARISAT 2 ESIAFI 1 (COMSTAR 4) SATCOM C5 TDRS 1 NATO 3D AR
    Name NORAD ID Int'l Code Launch date Period [minutes] Longitude LES 9 8747 1976-023B Mar 15, 1976 1436.1 105.8° W MARISAT 2 9478 1976-101A Oct 14, 1976 1475.5 10.8° E ESIAFI 1 (COMSTAR 4) 12309 1981-018A Feb 21, 1981 1436.3 75.2° E SATCOM C5 13631 1982-105A Oct 28, 1982 1436.1 104.7° W TDRS 1 13969 1983-026B Apr 4, 1983 1436 49.3° W NATO 3D 15391 1984-115A Nov 14, 1984 1516.6 34.6° E ARABSAT 1A 15560 1985-015A Feb 8, 1985 1433.9 169.9° W NAHUEL I1 (ANIK C1) 15642 1985-028B Apr 12, 1985 1444.9 18.6° E GSTAR 1 15677 1985-035A May 8, 1985 1436.1 105.3° W INTELSAT 511 15873 1985-055A Jun 30, 1985 1438.8 75.3° E GOES 7 17561 1987-022A Feb 26, 1987 1435.7 176.4° W OPTUS A3 (AUSSAT 3) 18350 1987-078A Sep 16, 1987 1455.9 109.5° W GSTAR 3 19483 1988-081A Sep 8, 1988 1436.1 104.8° W TDRS 3 19548 1988-091B Sep 29, 1988 1424.4 84.7° E ASTRA 1A 19688 1988-109B Dec 11, 1988 1464.4 168.5° E TDRS 4 19883 1989-021B Mar 13, 1989 1436.1 45.3° W INTELSAT 602 20315 1989-087A Oct 27, 1989 1436.1 177.9° E LEASAT 5 20410 1990-002B Jan 9, 1990 1436.1 100.3° E INTELSAT 603 20523 1990-021A Mar 14, 1990 1436.1 19.8° W ASIASAT 1 20558 1990-030A Apr 7, 1990 1450.9 94.4° E INSAT 1D 20643 1990-051A Jun 12, 1990 1435.9 76.9° E INTELSAT 604 20667 1990-056A Jun 23, 1990 1462.9 164.4° E COSMOS 2085 20693 1990-061A Jul 18, 1990 1436.2 76.4° E EUTELSAT 2-F1 20777 1990-079B Aug 30, 1990 1449.5 30.6° E SKYNET 4C 20776 1990-079A Aug 30, 1990 1436.1 13.6° E GALAXY 6 20873 1990-091B Oct 12, 1990 1443.3 115.5° W SBS 6 20872 1990-091A Oct 12, 1990 1454.6 27.4° W INMARSAT 2-F1 20918
    [Show full text]
  • China's Posture in Space. Implications for Europe
    CHINA´S POSTURE IN SPACE IMPLICATIONS FOR EUROPE Report 3, June 2007 coordinated by Wolfgang Rathgeber, ESPI China Report, June 2007 1 1 This work has been made possible thanks to the following contributors: ¾ Joachim GLAUBITZ (formerly with Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, Berlin) ¾ Keith HAYWARD (Royal Aeronautical Society, London) ¾ Isabelle SOURBÈS-VERGER (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris) The texts about the regional perceptions of China in chapter 3 are based on contributions from Thomas KUNZE (Konrad Adenauer Foundation, Moscow), Ram JAKHU (McGill University, Montreal), Emmanuel PUIG (Institut d’Études Politiques de Bordeaux) and Kazuto SUZUKI (University of Tsukuba). In addition, competent advice was provided by Karl BERGQUIST (European Space Agency, Paris). Short Title: ESPI Report 3, June 2007 Editor, Publisher: ESPI European Space Policy Institute A-1030 Vienna, Schwarzenbergplatz 6 Austria http://www.espi.or.at Tel.: +43 1 718 11 18 - 0 Fax - 99 Copyright: ESPI, June 2007 This report was funded, in part, through a contract with the EUROPEAN SPACE AGENCY (ESA). Rights reserved - No part of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose without permission from ESPI. Citations and extracts to be published by other means are subject to mentioning “source: ESPI Report 3, June 2007. All rights reserved” and sample transmission to ESPI before publishing. Price: 11,00 EUR Printed by ESA/ESTEC Compilation, Layout and Design: M. A. Jakob/ESPI and Panthera.cc China Report, June 2007 2 China´s Posture in Space. Implications for Europe TABLE OF CONTENTS E x e c u t i v e S u m m a r y ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial Space Transportation the Federal Aviation Administration’S Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA/AST) Licenses and Regulates U.S
    Federal Aviation Administration Commercial Space Transportation: 2008 Year In Review January 2009 HQ-09750.INDD 2008 Year in Review About the Office of Commercial Space Transportation The Federal Aviation Administration’s Office of Commercial Space Transportation (FAA/AST) licenses and regulates U.S. commercial space launch and reentry activity, as well as the operation of non-federal launch and reentry sites, as authorized by Executive Order 12465 and Title 49 United States Code, Subtitle IX, Chapter 701 (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act). FAA/AST’s mission is to ensure public health and safety and the safety of property while protecting the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States during commercial launch and reentry operations. In addition, FAA/AST is directed to encourage, facilitate, and promote commercial space launches and reentries. Additional information concerning commercial space transportation can be found on FAA/AST’s web site at http://ast.faa.gov. Cover: Art by John Sloan (2009) NOTICE Use of trade names or names of manufacturers in this document does not constitute an official endorsement of such products or manufacturers, either expressed or implied, by the Federal Aviation Administration. • i • Federal Aviation Administration / Commercial Space Transportation Table of Contents Introduction . .1 2008 FAA-Licensed Orbital Launch Summary . .3 U.S. and FAA-Licensed Orbital Launch Activity in Detail . 5. 2008 Worldwide Orbital Launch Activity . .8 Worldwide Orbital Payload Summary . .11 Launch Activities by Country . .13 Five-Year Worldwide Space Transportation Trends . .17 2008 FAA Experimental Permit Flight Summary . .21 Appendix : 2008 Worldwide Orbital Launch Events . .22 • ii • 2008 Year in Review InTrODUCTIOn TheCommercial Space Transportation: 2008 Year in Review summarizes U.S.
    [Show full text]