DOCSLIB.ORG

REPORT on the First Progress Report from the Commission on Economic and Social Cohesion

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
REPORT on the First Progress Report from the Commission on Economic and Social Cohesion EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT GGG G G G G 1999 G G 2004 GGG Session document FINAL A5-0354/2002 14 October 2002 REPORT on the first progress report from the Commission on economic and social cohesion (COM(2002) 46 – C5-0198/2002 – 2002/2094(COS)) Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism Rapporteur: Elisabeth Schroedter RR\479717EN.doc PE 314.720 EN EN PE 314.720 2/25 RR\479717EN.doc EN CONTENTS Page PROCEDURAL PAGE.............................................................................................................. 4 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION ............................................................................................. 5 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT.............................................................................................. 8 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS, HUMAN RIGHTS, COMMON SECURITY AND DEFENCE POLICY ............................. 16 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT..................................................................................................... 19 RR\479717EN.doc 3/25 PE 314.720 EN PROCEDURAL PAGE By letter of 1 February 2002, the Commission forwarded to Parliament its first progress report on economic and social cohesion (COM(2002) 46 – 2002/2094(COS)). At the sitting of 13 May 2002 the President of Parliament announced that he had referred this report to the Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism as the committee responsible and the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy, the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs and the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development for their opinions (C5-0198/2002). The Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism had appointed Elisabeth Schroedter rapporteur at its meeting of 21 February 2002. It considered the Commission report and the draft report at its meetings of 10 September and 8 October 2002. At the last meeting it adopted the motion for a resolution by 46 votes to 1, with 5 abstentions. The following were present for the vote: Luciano Caveri, chairman; Rijk van Dam, Gilles Savary and Helmuth Markov, vice-chairmen; Elisabeth Schroedter, rapporteur; Emmanouil Bakopoulos, Carlos Bautista Ojeda (for Camilo Nogueira Román), Rolf Berend, Felipe Camisón Asensio, Luigi Cocilovo, Jan Dhaene, Den Dover (for Jacqueline Foster), Garrelt Duin, Alain Esclopé, Giovanni Claudio Fava, Mathieu J.H. Grosch, Konstantinos Hatzidakis, Ewa Hedkvist Petersen, Juan de Dios Izquierdo Collado, Georg Jarzembowski, Elisabeth Jeggle (for Sérgio Marques), Karsten Knolle (for Philip Charles Bradbourn), Dieter-Lebrecht Koch, Giorgio Lisi, Emmanouil Mastorakis, Erik Meijer, Rosa Miguélez Ramos, Jan Mulder (for Isidoro Sánchez García pursuant to Rule 153(2)), Francesco Musotto, James Nicholson, Josu Ortuondo Larrea, Wilhelm Ernst Piecyk, Giovanni Pittella (for Danielle Darras), Samuli Pohjamo, Bernard Poignant, José Javier Pomés Ruiz, Alonso José Puerta, Reinhard Rack, Encarnación Redondo Jiménez (for Dana Rosemary Scallon pursuant to Rule 153(2)), Ingo Schmitt, Brian Simpson, Dirk Sterckx, Ulrich Stockmann, Margie Sudre, Hannes Swoboda (for John Hume), Joaquim Vairinhos, Jaime Valdivielso de Cué (for Karla M.H. Peijs pursuant to Rule 153(2)), Ari Vatanen, Herman Vermeer, Dominique Vlasto (for Christine de Veyrac), Christian Ulrik von Boetticher (for Carlos Ripoll i Martínez Bedoya) and Mark Francis Watts. The opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy and the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development are attached; the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs decided on 19 March 2002 not to deliver an opinion. The report was tabled on 14 October 2002. PE 314.720 4/25 RR\479717EN.doc EN MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION European Parliament resolution on the first progress report from the Commission on economic and social cohesion (COM(2002) 46 – C5-0198/2002 – 2002/2094(COS)) The European Parliament, – having regard to the first progress report from the Commission (COM(2002) 46 – C5-0198/20021), – having regard to its resolution of 7 February 20022 on the second report from the Commission on Economic and Social Cohesion (COM(2001) 24), – having regard to the study commissioned by the Commission and drawn up by Jörg Beutel entitled ‘the economic impact of Objective 1 interventions for the period 2000-2006’ of May 2002, – having regard to the conclusions of the Göteborg European Council of 15 and 16 June 2001 on a sustainable development strategy, – having regard to its resolution of 31 May 20013 on environmental policy and sustainable development: preparing for the Göteborg European Council, – having regard to its resolution of 29 November 20014 on the Commission White Paper ‘European Governance’ (COM(2001) 428), – having regard to its resolution of 9 March 19945 on the Commission White Paper on ‘Growth, Competitiveness, Employment – the challenges and ways forward into the 21st Century’ (COM(93) 700), – having regard to Articles 158 to 162 and Article 299(2) of the EC Treaty, – having regard to Rule 47(1) of its Rules of Procedure, – having regard to the report of the Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism and the opinions of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy and the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (A5-0354/2002), A. whereas all public contributions so far have noted that European cohesion policy must remain the cornerstone of European integration, because otherwise the cohesion of the 1 OJ C not yet published. 2 OJ C Texts adopted by Parliament, P5-TA(2002)0060. 3 OJ C 47 E, 21.2.2002, p. 223. 4 OJ C 153 E, 27.6.2002, p. 314. 5 OJ C 91, 28.3.1994, p. 124. RR\479717EN.doc 5/25 PE 314.720 EN Union will be in jeopardy, which would have disadvantages for all EU Member States, B. whereas it is impossible to drop below the current share of 0.45% of the Union’s GDP set aside for cohesion policy without seriously jeopardising the achievement of the cohesion objectives with a view to enlargement and sacrificing the credibility of cohesion policy, C. whereas any attempt to renationalise European structural policy must be rejected, since otherwise serious damage could be done to the European model based on solidarity between the richest and poorest regions, D. having regard to the outcome of the study on the economic impact of aid in Objective 1 regions which notes that 24.2% of EU aid for Objective 1 regions benefits other EU regions, E. having regard to the debate on the issue of the equitable division of existing financial resources in an EU of 27 Member States and in view of the fact that the regions in the new Member States have a substantially lower level of development than the EU average and current Objective 1 regions and that most regions in the new Member States will receive Objective 1 status, F. having regard to the fact that structural policy interventions have not so far had all the desired results despite a very substantial financial input by the EU and that in particular deep-seated imbalances remain between the various regional areas of the EU and unemployment in the poorest regions is further increasing, whereas the still high level of unemployment can be combated by a regional development policy, designed to create new prospects for investment, employment and the use of available regional resources in the areas that have made least progress and industrial reconversion areas, G. whereas the most remote regions have a distinct geographical, economic and social identity within the European Union, H. having regard to the permanent geographical handicaps which affect the socio-economic and structural development of certain regions of the Union, particularly the most remote regions, and the need to find a specific treatment for them, I. whereas employment policy, the CAP, transport policy and finance policy must be brought into accord with the cohesion objectives of a sustainable regional development, J. whereas there is a need for greater simplification of the procedures and greater efficiency in the partnership between the Commission, the Member States and the regions concerned, K. whereas regional policy must promote the polycentric development of the European Union, Future of European cohesion policy 1. Notes that European cohesion policy and the solidarity it involves between the wealthy and the less wealthy Member States of the Union must remain an integral part of an PE 314.720 6/25 RR\479717EN.doc EN enlarged Union; RR\479717EN.doc 7/25 PE 314.720 EN 2. Calls for a sustained reform of the EU’s structural policy which allows the regions to pursue their development plans independently of EU interventions but with the backing of EU interventions within the framework of straightforward administrative procedures; 3. Considers that in the run-up to enlargement, cohesion policy needs to be reviewed, improved and adapted to cater for the new conditions that will prevail in an enlarged Union; 4. Insists on the necessity of carefully adapting Community assistance within the cohesion policy framework to the specific needs and socio-economic realities (which have resulted from their unique history and economic and political transition) of future Member States so that it has a maximum impact on economic competitiveness, the living standards of the population and sustainable economic development; 5. Reminds the candidate countries of the imperative need to further improve their administrative capacity and coordination mechanisms
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Association of Accredited Lobbyists to the European Parliament
    ASSOCIATION OF ACCREDITED LOBBYISTS TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT OVERVIEW OF EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT FORUMS AALEP Secretariat Date: October 2007 Avenue Milcamps 19 B-1030 Brussels Tel: 32 2 735 93 39 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.lobby-network.eu TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………..3 Executive Summary……………………………………………………….4-7 1. European Energy Forum (EEF)………………………………………..8-16 2. European Internet Forum (EIF)………………………………………..17-27 3. European Parliament Ceramics Forum (EPCF………………………...28-29 4. European Parliamentary Financial Services Forum (EPFSF)…………30-36 5. European Parliament Life Sciences Circle (ELSC)……………………37 6. Forum for Automobile and Society (FAS)…………………………….38-43 7. Forum for the Future of Nuclear Energy (FFNE)……………………..44 8. Forum in the European Parliament for Construction (FOCOPE)……..45-46 9. Pharmaceutical Forum…………………………………………………48-60 10.The Kangaroo Group…………………………………………………..61-70 11.Transatlantic Policy Network (TPN)…………………………………..71-79 Conclusions………………………………………………………………..80 Index of Listed Companies………………………………………………..81-90 Index of Listed MEPs……………………………………………………..91-96 Most Active MEPs participating in Business Forums…………………….97 2 INTRODUCTION Businessmen long for certainty. They long to know what the decision-makers are thinking, so they can plan ahead. They yearn to be in the loop, to have the drop on things. It is the genius of the lobbyists and the consultants to understand this need, and to satisfy it in the most imaginative way. Business forums are vehicles for forging links and maintain a dialogue with business, industrial and trade organisations. They allow the discussions of general and pre-legislative issues in a different context from lobbying contacts about specific matters. They provide an opportunity to get Members of the European Parliament and other decision-makers from the European institutions together with various business sectors.
    [Show full text]
  • Neue Gesichter in Der Europäischen Kommission Und Im Europäischen Parlament
    Thema aus Brüssel Neue Gesichter in der Europäischen Kommission und im Europäischen Parlament Die Europäische Union verzeichnet in die SPE und Hans-Gert Pöttering für die No. 6 / 2004 diesem Jahr einen großen personellen EVP. Bei den Grünen steht mit Daniel Umbruch. Mit den Wahlen zum Europäi- Cohn-Bendit ebenfalls ein Abgeordneter aus schen Parlament im Juni und einer neu der deutschen Delegation der Grünen an der besetzten Europäischen Kommission, die Spitze. im November ihre Arbeit aufnahm, sind Zum Präsidenten des Europäischen Parla- zwei der drei entscheidenden Institutio- mentes wurde Josep Borrell aus den Reihen nen auf der Ebene der politischen Akteu- der spanischen Sozialisten gewählt. Diese re neu zusammengestellt worden – der Wahl beruht auf einer Absprache zwischen Europäisches Parlament: Rat als Vertretung der Regierungen än- SPE und EVP: Nach der Hälfte der Sit- dert seine Zusammensetzung punktuell je EVP größte Fraktion, SPE zungsperiode übernimmt Hans-Gert Pötte- stellt den Parlamentspräsi- nach Ausgang der Wahlen in den Mit- ring, Vorsitzender der EVP-Fraktion, diesen denten gliedstaaten. Posten. Borrell, der zum ersten Mal Europa- abgeordneter ist, war im spanischen Parla- ment Vorsitzender des europapolitischen Das Europäische Parlament Ausschusses und Mitglied im Europäischen Durch die Wahlen zum Europäischen Parla- Konvent, der 2002-2003 den Entwurf für die ment, die zum ersten Mal in 25 statt in 15 europäische Verfassung ausarbeitete. Staaten stattfanden, sind zahlreiche neue Abgeordnete in die Volksvertretung gelangt. Mit der Erweiterung ist das Parlament auf Die Europäische Kommission 732 Abgeordnete vergrößert worden, davon Die Europäische Kommission hat ihr Ge- Kommissionspräsident: entfallen 99 Sitze auf deutsche Parlamenta- sicht deutlich verändert. Die Prodi- Manuel Barroso aus Portu- rier, darunter 23 SPD-Vertreter.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 1999 2004 Session document FINAL A5-0444/2002 9 December 2002 REPORT on the Commission White Paper ‘European transport policy for 2010: time to decide’ (COM(2001) 370 – C5-0658/2001 – 2001/2281(COS)) Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism Rapporteur: Juan de Dios Izquierdo Collado RR\484385EN.doc PE 301.855 EN EN PE 301.855 2/31 RR\484385EN.doc EN CONTENTS Page PROCEDURAL PAGE.............................................................................................................. 4 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION ............................................................................................. 5 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT............................................................................................ 17 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, EXTERNAL TRADE, RESEARCH AND ENERGY........................................................................................................................ 21 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND CONSUMER POLICY ............................................................................................................ 26 RR\484385EN.doc 3/31 PE 301.855 EN PROCEDURAL PAGE By letter of 14 September 2001 the Commission forwarded to Parliament its White Paper ‘European transport policy for 2010: time to decide’ (COM(2001) 370 – 2001/2281(COS)). At the sitting of 13 December 2001 the President of Parliament announced that she had referred the White Paper to the Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism as the committee
    [Show full text]
  • (Full Court) 30 March 2004 * in Case C-167/02 P, Willi Rothley, Residing
    JUDGMENT OF 30. 3. 2004 - CASE C-167/02 P JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Full Court) 30 March 2004 * In Case C-167/02 P, Willi Rothley, residing in Rockenhausen (Germany), Marco Pannella, residing in Rome (Italy), Marco Cappato, residing in Milan (Italy), Gianfranco Dell'Alba, residing in Rome, Benedetto Della Vedova, residing in Milan, Olivier Dupuis, residing in Rome, Klaus-Heiner Lehne, residing in Düsseldorf (Germany), Johannes Voggenhuber, residing in Vienna (Austria), * Language of the case: German. I-3166 ROTHLEY AND OTHERS v PARLIAMENT Christian von Boetticher, residing in Pinneberg (Germany), Emma Bonino, residing in Rome, Elmar Brok, residing in Bielefeld (Germany), Renato Brunetta, residing in Rome, Udo Bullmann, residing in Gießen (Germany), Michl Ebner, residing in Bolzano (Italy), Raina A. Mercedes Echerer, residing in Vienna, Markus Ferber, residing in Bobingen (Germany), Francesco Fiori, residing in Voghera (Italy), Evelyne Gebhardt, residing in Mulfingen (Germany), Norbert Glante, residing in Werder/Havel (Germany), Alfred Gomolka, residing in Greifswald (Germany), I-3167 JUDGMENT OF 30. 3. 2004 - CASE C-167/02 P Friedrich-Wilhelm Graefe zu Baringdorf, residing in Spenge (Germany), Lissy Gröner, residing in Neustadt (Germany), Ruth Hieronymi, residing in Bonn (Germany), Magdalene Hoff, residing in Hagen (Germany), Georg Jarzembowski, residing in Hamburg (Germany), Karin Jöns, residing in Bremen (Germany), Karin Junker, residing in Düsseldorf, Othmar Karas, residing in Vienna, Margot Keßler, residing in Kehmstedt (Germany), Heinz
    [Show full text]
  • Bundesrat Unterrichtung
    Bundesrat Drucksache 496/08 03.07.08 Unterrichtung durch das Europäische Parlament Erklärung des Europäischen Parlaments zu rheumatischen Erkrankungen Zugeleitet mit Schreiben des Generalsekretärs des Europäischen Parlaments - 310843 - vom 30. Juni 2008. Das Europäische Parlament hat die Entschließung in der Sitzung am 5. Juni 2008 angenommen. Vertrieb: Bundesanzeiger Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Amsterdamer Straße 192, 50735 Köln Telefon: 0221/97668-0, Telefax: 0221/97668-338 ISSN 0720-2946 Drucksache 496/08 - 2 - Erklärung des Europäischen Parlaments zu rheumatischen Erkrankungen Das Europäische Parlament, – gestützt auf Artikel 116 seiner Geschäftsordnung, A. in der Erwägung, dass es sich bei rheumatischen Erkrankungen um chronische Beschwerden handelt, die Schmerzen, Leid und Behinderung verursachen, B. in der Erwägung, dass 30% bis 40% der Bevölkerung Symptome des Bewegungsapparats aufweisen und dass von diesen Symptomen über 100 Millionen Menschen in Europa betroffen sind, C. in der Erwägung, dass rheumatische Erkrankungen die Hauptursache für die Invalidität und Frühberentung von Arbeitnehmern sind, D. in der Erwägung, dass Schätzungen zufolge die über 65 Jahre alten Menschen bis 2030 ein Viertel der europäischen Bevölkerung ausmachen werden und dass die meisten Menschen, die über 70 Jahre alt sind, chronische oder wiederkehrende rheumatische Symptome aufweisen, E. in der Erwägung, dass die Festlegung einer Sozial- und Gesundheitspolitik, die auf einer Analyse der Bedürfnisse der an rheumatischen Erkrankungen leidenden Menschen basiert,
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ««« « « « « 1999 « « 2004 ««« Session document FINAL A5-0152/2002 25 April 2002 REPORT on the Commission communication to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on working together for the future of European tourism (COM(2001) 665 – C5-0077/2002 – 2002/2038(COS)) Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism Rapporteur: Helena Torres Marques RR\467661EN.doc PE 301.883 EN EN PE 301.883 2/33 RR\467661EN.doc EN CONTENTS Page PROCEDURAL PAGE ..............................................................................................................4 MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION .............................................................................................5 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT............................................................................................13 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON LEGAL AFFAIRS AND THE INTERNAL MARKET .................................................................................................................................17 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, EXTERNAL TRADE, RESEARCH AND ENERGY ........................................................................................................................21 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS ............24 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND CONSUMER POLICY ............................................................................................................29 RR\467661EN.doc 3/33
    [Show full text]
  • フリードリヒ・エーベルト財団 東京事務所 設立 50周年 2017 Zivilgesellschaftlicher Dialog Zwischen Japan Und Deutschland 50 Jahre Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung in Japan
    1967-2017 Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Büro Japan 7-5-56 Akasaka Minato-ku Tokyo, 107-0052 Japan 50 Jahre Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung in Japan in Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Jahre 50 フリードリヒ・エーベルト財団 東京事務所 〒 107-0052 東京都港区赤坂 7-5-56 1967 ドイツ文化会館 4F Tel: 03-6277-7551 Fax: 03-3588-6035 [email protected] フリードリヒ・エーベルト財団 東京事務所 設立50周年 2017 Zivilgesellschaftlicher Dialog zwischen Japan und Deutschland 50 Jahre Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung in Japan 日独政治対話の歩み フリードリヒ・エーベルト財団 東京事務所 設立50周年 WWW.FES-JAPAN.ORG Geschichte der FES Demokratie, Frieden und Entwicklung fördern, FES の歴史 Globalisierung sozial gestalten 民主主義・平和・発展の推進 社会的に公正なグローバル化 1925 Sozialdemokrat Friedrich Ebert, erster 1925 年 2月28日、社会民主主義者フリードリヒ・エー demokratisch gewählter Reichspräsident ベ ルト没（ 54 歳）。初の民主的選挙で選ばれ der Weimarer Republik, stirbt am 28. Feb- たドイツ共和国初代大統領。 ruar im Alter von 54 Jahren 1925 年 3月2日、フリードリヒ・エーベルト財団設立。 1925 Am 2. März wird die Friedrich-Ebert- エーベルトの遺志を継ぎ、財団はあらゆる階 Stiftung gegründet. Sie soll im Sinne Eberts 層の人々の民主主義精神に基づく政治教育、 der politischen Bildung von Menschen aller 才能ある若者の支援、ドイツと諸外国との相 Schichten im demokratischen Geiste, der Unterstützung begabter junger Menschen 互理解の促進に資すべきとされた。 und der Förderung des Verständnisses zwi- 1933 年 ナチスによる財団の活動禁止。 schen Deutschland und anderen Ländern dienen 1946 年 フリードリヒ・エーベルト財団再建。 1933 Verbot durch die Nationalsozialisten 1956 年 政治教育のため、フリードリヒ・エーベルト財 1946 Wiederbegründung der Friedrich-Ebert- 団地域成人大学開校。 Stiftung 1963 年 開発協力省の助成により、開発協力体制の整 1956 Eröffnung der ersten Heimvolkshochschule 備。 der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung zur politischen 1967 年 東京事務所開設。
    [Show full text]
  • Official Journal C 106 Volume 34 of the European Communities N Apr"Mi
    ISSN 0378-6986 Official Journal c 106 Volume 34 of the European Communities n Apr"mi English edition Information and Notices Notice No Contents page I Information European Parliament 1990/1991 and 1991/1992 sessions 91/C 106/01 Minutes of the sitting of Monday, 11 March 1991 Proceedings of the sitting 1. Resumption of session 1 2. Approval of minutes 1 3. Announcement by the President on observers from the former GDR 2 4. Verification of credentials 2 5. Membership of committees 2 6. Petitions 2 7. Referral to committee — changed referral 3 8. Written declarations (Rule 65) 3 9. Documents received 3 10. Texts of treaties forwarded by the Council 6 11. Official welcome 6 12. Announcement by the President on the interinstitutional conference taking place alongside the intergovernmental conferences 6 13. Order of business 6 14. Deadlines for tabling amendments and motions for resolutions 8 15. Speaking time 8 16. Topical and urgent debate (subjects proposed) 9 (Continued overleaf) Price: ECU 24 Notice No Contents (continued) ' Page 17. Official welcome Q 18. Amendment of Rules 69, 71 and 74 (debate) 9 19. Human capital and mobility ** I (debate) JQ 20. Commission statement on the common agricultural policy 10 21. Organisms harmful to plants * (debate) IQ 22. EEC-Morocco and EEC-Mauritania fishery agreements * (debate) 11 23. Agricultural production and the environment * (debate) 11 24. Market in fruit and vegetables * (debate) 1 j 25. Community dairy policy (debate) j j 26. Agenda for next sitting 12 27. Closure of session 19 91/C106/02 Minutes of the sitting of Tuesday, 12 March 1991 Part I: Proceedings of the sitting 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 180 Tage, 164 Gesetze, 93 Beschlüsse Zur Wiedervereinigung 30 Jahre Freie Wahlen Zur Volkskammer Festschrift Des Deutschen Bundestages
    180 Tage, 164 Gesetze, 93 Beschlüsse zur Wiedervereinigung 30 Jahre freie Wahlen zur Volkskammer Festschrift des Deutschen Bundestages Berlin, 12. März 2020 180 Tage, 164 Gesetze, 93 Beschlüsse zur Wiedervereinigung Festschrift des Deutschen Bundestages 6 Programm der Ausstellungseröffnung 8 Vorwort 10 Begrüßung durch den Präsidenten des Deutschen Bundestages, Dr. Wolfgang Schäuble 16 Grußwort der ehemaligen Präsidentin der Volkskammer, Dr. Sabine Bergmann-Pohl 24 Moderiertes Gespräch zum Wirken der Volkskammer Dokumentation der Ausstellung 32 „180 Tage, 164 Gesetze, 93 Beschlüsse zur Wiedervereinigung: 30 Jahre freie Wahlen zur Volkskammer“ Der Weg zu freien Wahlen Der Wahlkampf Der Wahltag Die 10. Volkskammer Die Wiedervereinigung $XIGHU,QWHUQHWVHLWHGHV'HXWVFKHQ%XQGHVWDJHVğQ- Inhalt den Sie unter https://www.bundestag.de/volkskammer weitere Informationen zum Thema Volkskammer sowie eine kurze Reportage über die Ausstellung. 2 Ausstellung in der Halle des Paul-Löbe-Hauses zur Feier des 30. Jahrestages der freien Wahlen zur Volkskammer. 3 180 Tage, 164 Gesetze, 93 Beschlüsse zur Wiedervereinigung Festschrift des Deutschen Bundestages Empfang der ehemaligen Volkskammerabgeordneten im Deutschen Bundestag am 12. März 2020 5 Georg Friedrich Händel (1685 – 1759) Auszüge aus den Wassermusik-Suiten, Arr Frederic Mills, gespielt vom Blechbläserquintett des Deutschen Symphonie-Orchesters Berlin Falk Maertens, Trompete; Raphael Mentzen, Trompete; Antonio Adriani, Horn; Andreas Klein, Posaune; Johannes Lipp, Tuba Begrüßungsansprache des Präsidenten
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 1999 2004 Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism PE/XII/PV/PV/04-02 MINUTES of the meeting of 16 February 2004, 15.00 - 17.30, and 17 February 2004, 9.00 - 12.30 and 15.00 - 16.30 BRUSSELS The meeting opened on Monday, 16 February 2004, at 15.05, with Gilles Savary, vice- chairman, in the chair. 1. Adoption of draft agenda PE 331.411 The draft agenda was adopted with the following changes: - On request by Ms Hedkvist Petersen, the consideration of her report on frontal protection on motor vehicles was postponed to the March committee meeting. - Mr Stockmann's report on slots had to be taken off the agenda, as the Common Position had not arrived in time. Speakers: Gilles Savary, Georg Jarzembowski, Wilhelm Ernst Piecyk Decision: It was decided by 9 votes to 7 to vote on Mr Bradbourn's report on guidelines for the development of TENs on 17 February. Mr Paolo Costa, chairman, assumed the chair. 2. Protection of animals during transport PE 331.399 T08468 (CNS030171 - COM(03)0425 - C5-0438/03) PE 331.395/AM Rapporteur: Herman Vermeer Consideration of amendments 1-94 Speakers: Herman Vermeer, Brigitte Wenzel-Perillo, Hannes Swoboda, Jacqueline Foster, Mark Francis Watts, Samuli Pohjamo, Roger Helmer and Mr Simonin (European Commission). PV\516083EN.doc PE 331.412 Or. En. EN EN 3. Air transport: protection against unfair pricing practices by countries not members of the European Community ***II T07772 -(COD020067 - A5-0439/02) PE 331.410 (COD)020067 - C5-0018/04) Rapporteur: Nicholas Clegg Consideration of draft recommendation Speakers: Paolo Costa, Ulrich Stockmann, Georg Jarzembowski and Mr Hilbrecht (European Commission) 4.
    [Show full text]
  • PARLEMENT EUROPEEN F
    DIRECTEUR INFO-MEMO REDACTION: DE LA PUBLICATION, BELLIARD 5027 ÉDITEUR RESPONSABLE: ÎÉL.:+322.284 2860 y;JJ,ô;;<f, Gurno NAETS FAx:+322.284 3321 REDACTEUR EN CHEF: 97-113 R. BELLIARD STR. JACQUES NANCY B-1047 BRUXELLES ' Direction de la presse ,JJElo 2)ci b: 5t'CJ'_ • Epistel/Oride:+322.522 3720 - Europlzone:+322.284 2800 Direction générale de l'information et des relations publiques PARLEMENT EUROPEEN f ,. L'INFO MEMO EDITERA DESORMAIS DES NUMEROS "SPECIAL ELECTIONS" . Ce Numéro Révisé vise à faire le point sur l'évolution des groupes politiques de 1989 à 1994 et sur les premières listes. PREMIERE PARTIE 1. TABLEAUX GLOBAUX SUR L'EVOLUTION 1989 A 1994 L'ensemble des tableaux a été élaboré en étroite coopération avec les services d'Eurostat que nous tenons à remercier. Cette coopération se poursuivra jusqu'aux élections. - Les sigles des groupes politiques du PE (p. 3, 4 et 5) - Les 4 premiers tableaux (p. 6 et 7) permettent aux lecteurs de suivre l'évolution : . session constitutive de juillet 1989 et état du parlement au 31 janvier 1994. On constate que le parlement qui avait 10 groupes en 1989 en comporte 8 au 31 janvier 1 994. députés au PE en avril 1992 et en janvier 1993 Ces deux tableaux permettent de constater : qu'en avril 1992, les 34 députés du Groupe des Démocrates Européens ont adhérés au PPE. qu'en janvier 1993, sur les 28 députés du groupe de la Gauche Unitaire Européenne, 20 PDS italiens ont adhérés au Groupe Socialiste et le 8 autres au Non Inscrits.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT ««« « « 2004 « « 2009 « « ««« Temporary Committee on Policy Challenges and Budgetary Means of the enlarged Union 2007-2013 PROVISIONAL 2004/2209(INI) 31.3.2005 DRAFT REPORT on the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: Financial Perspectives 2007 - 2013 (2004/2209(INI)) Temporary Committee on Policy Challenges and Budgetary Means of the enlarged Union 2007-2013 Rapporteur: Reimer Böge PART C: OPINIONS PR\552780EN.doc PE 353.393v01-00 EN EN PR_INI CONTENTS Page OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS ................................................3 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON DEVELOPMENT .....................................................7 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE ..................................13 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON BUDGETARY CONTROL.....................................17 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC AND MONETARY AFFAIRS ..........23 OPINION of the COMMITTEE ON EMPLOYMENT AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS ................27 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ENVIRONMENT, PUBLIC HEALTH AND FOOD SAFETY...................................................................................................................31 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON INDUSTRY, RESEARCH AND ENERGY ............40 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE INTERNAL MARKET AND CONSUMER PROTECTION.....................................................................................................................46 OPINION OF THE COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORT AND TOURISM .............................50
    [Show full text]