Curriculum Vitae

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Curriculum Vitae CURRICULUM VITAE Personal details name Helga Schröder, Ph.D. date of birth 24th January 1952 nationality German marital status married with three children current position Senior Lecturer at the Department of Linguistics and Languages of the University of Nairobi, Kenya Contact details postal address PO-Box 590, 00621 Nairobi residential address 234 Ruaka Close, Runda Estate, Nairobi phone 00254 – 20 – 7120805 mobile +254 – 734 – 343452 email <[email protected]> Academic qualifications Ph.D. (Nairobi, 2004) M.A. (Reading/UK, 1994) Diploma in Biblical Studies and Advanced Diploma in Mission Studies (Christchurch/UK, 1980) Teacher Training Certificate [Staatsexamen II,] (Oberhausen/Germany, 1977) M.A. [Staatsexamen I] in education, history, philosophy (Cologne/Germany, 1976) Specialities and areas of research Morpho-syntax –discourse interface Pragmatics Relevance Theory/Lexical Pragmatics Intercultural communication VSO languages Nilotic languages Chomsky’s Minimalist Program for African Languages Ergativity in Africa, ergative origins of Nilotic languages Clause-chaining in Nilotic languages 1 Education 1962 – 1970 Gymnasium (high school) in Cologne-Mühlheim (languages: English 9 yrs, Latin 5 yrs (great 'Latinum'), French 3 yrs,), graduated with Reifeprüfung/Abitur (equivalent to British A-level exams in 4 major subjects [German, English, Mathematics and Social Science]) 1958 – 1962 Primary school (Cologne/Germany). Teaching experience May 2007 up to now teaching linguistics at the department of Linguistics and Languages Nov 2002 till May 2007 part-time lecturer at the University of Nairobi for M.A. in German studies and M.A. in Linguistics Jan 1992 – July 1998 taught linguistics and translation theory in the Translator's Degree Program at Pan African Christian College (PACC) in Nairobi, and at Nairobi Evangelical Graduate School of Theology (NEGST) [except for academic year mid-93 to mid-94] Jul – Sep 1985 taught grammar (morpho-syntax) at German SIL-school Subjects taught University of Nairobi: Postgraduate: Syntax, Morphology, Grammatical Theories, Semantics and Pragmatics; General Linguistics, Discourse and Sociolinguistics in German Studies, History of Germany, Discourse in Translation Undergraduate: Advanced Linguistics: Government and Binding, 4th year, Intercultural communication 4th year Pan African Christian College (now: Pan African Christian University) Undergraduate: Phonology, Syntax, Discourse, Semantics, Pragmatics, Sociolinguistics, Introduction to Linguistics Nairobi Evangelical Graduate School of Theology (now AIU African International University) Postgraduate: Morpho-Syntax, Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse 2 Research 1982 – 1989 linguistic and anthropological research and literacy work among the Toposa of Sudan (Apr 1982 - Sep 1984 in Riwoto/Toposa, Mar 1986 - May 1988 among Toposa refugees in Juba, and Jun 1988 - Jun 1990 as a displaced project in Kenya) Supervisions Ph.D. Supervisions Justine Sikuku Syntactic patterns of anaphoric relations Lubukusu: Representation and Interpretation in a Minimalist Perspective. (completed 2011.) Prisca Jerono The Tugen Sentence: A Minimalist approach. (Handed in 15th of July 2011, completed 2011) Basilio Mungania Word order in Kiswahili, A Minimalist approach. (Since 2009 ongoing) Silvano Murithi Ndigwa Syntax-pragmatics interface: A case study of Gichuka. The Minimalist Program and Relevance Theory perspective. (Since 2011, ongoing.) Daniel Onyango Metaphors and culture in the political discourse of the Luo of Kenya (Since February 2013) M.A. Project Supervisions Ngoge Tabley Amos A theoretical Analysis of implicatures of idioms in a spontaneous communication in market in Ekegusii. A Relevance-theoretic approach. Nairobi 2012. David Barasa Tense and Aspect in Ateso – The Minimalist Approach, Nairobi 2012. Florence Wangui Mithamo Mismatches in Translating figurative language: A semantic-pragmatic problem of metaphors, Nairobi 2012. Jonyo Silas Otieno Politics of Identity and Ideology. Political Oratory of Raila Odinga and the Manifesto of the Orange Democratic Movement. A CDA Approach, Nairobi 2012. Mwangi George Waweru A lexical functional analysis of pronominalisation in the Kikuyu Language, Nairobi 2012. Muniafu Mulemia Mulongo A Relevance-theoretic analysis of Lubukusu Metaphors, Nairobi, 2012. Francis Onyango Morphosyntactic verb inflections for tense and aspect in Igikuria, Nairobi 2012. Ruth Ouko Pragmatics of Infosuasion in religious discourse in the Kenyan Electronic Media, Nairobi 2012. 3 Doris Mutio Mutisya Analysis of the most frequent mistakes in simultaneous interpretation and why they occur. Nairobi 2011. Theophan Marube Obaiga Intratextual syntactic and lexical inconsistencies in French into English translation. A case study of the African charter for public service. Nairobi 2011. Ramndani Aziz Machine translation of embedded clauses. English>French. Nairobi, 2011. Stephen Sila Kilyungi Syntactic Interpretation & Representation of Reflexity in Kikamba. A Minimalist Approach. Nairobi, 2011. Irungu Jane Wambui The role of explicatures and Implicatures in Advertising Discourse. A comparison between English and Gikuyu using Relevance Theory. Nairobi, 2011. Njuguna Zipporah Wambui Stereotyping in Gikuyu. A Lexical Pragmatic Approach. Nairobi, 2010. Njimu Purity Njeri Lexical Adjustments of Sports Language in three Kenyan Newspapers. Nairobi, 2010. Anyim Nancy Achieng Sense relations in Dholuo: A Lexical Pragmatic Approach. Nairobi, 2010. Njura Gerald Topic and Focus in Dholuo Narrative texts. Nairobi, 2009. Munga Catherine Sense relations in Gikuyu: A Lexical Pragmatic Approach. Nairobi, 2009. Muchiri Anne The Communicative Effectiveness of Text Messaging as a modern medium of communication. Nairobi, 2009. Myuku Jacinta Akinyi Language-mixing in the Language of Advertising. A case study of Commercial Banks and mobile telecommunication firms in Kenya. Nairobi, 2009. Erick Odero Tense and Aspect in Ekegusii. A Minimalist Analysis. Nairobi, 2008. Linda Mang’eli Nabwire The use of “Change” and “Majimbo” as political con- cepts during the 2007 General Election in Kenya. Nairobi, 2008. Silvano Murithi Ndigwa Empty Categories in the Gichuka: A Government and Binding Perspective. Nairobi, 2008. Pauline Gathoni Mbugua Verbal derivation in Maasai. A Minimalist Approach. Nairobi, 2008. Anne Ndunge Nzioka A Minimalist Analysis of Kikamba Tense and Aspect. Nairobi, 2007. Marianne K. Munyao The Morpho-Syntax of Kikamba Verb Derivations: A Minimalist Approach. Nairobi, 2006. Monica Odhiambo Ergativity in Dholuo: A Comparative Study with Shilluk and Pari. Nairobi, 2006. Silvia Koki Prototypes in Kikamba: Studies in the Prototype Theory. Nairobi, 2006. 4 Caroline Wamucii Mbuthia Das Bild der Frau in kenianischer und deutscher Literatur in der Moderne. MA Project in German Studies, Nairobi, 2006. Meshack Muendo Zeitbilder in interkulturellen Interaktionen. Nairobi, 2006. Mary Oichoe Ulinganishi wa Kirai Tenzi cha ks na ek Kimofosintaksia: Mtazamo wa Uminimalisti. Nairobi, 2005. Rukiya Swaleh Mofosintaksia ya Kishazi cha Kitikuu: Mtazamo wa Uminimalisti. Nairobi, 2005. Norbert Basweti A Morpho-syntactic Analysis of Agreement in Ekegusii in the Minimalist Program. Nairobi 2005. Rose Atieno A Morphosyntactic Analysis of Dholuo Coordinate and Subordinate Complex Sentences. Nairobi, 2004. Njoroge Gachomo Tense, Aspect, Mood- Morpho-syntactic Verb Inflections in Kikuyu. Nairobi 2004 Everlyn Olouch A Morphosyntactic Analysis of Mood in Dholuo: The Minimalist Approach. Nairobi, 2004. Bruno Odawa Tone in Dholuo: An Autosegmental Approach. Nairobi, 2004. James Orao Das Keniabild in der deutschen Presse, eine Inhalts- analyse der überregionalen deutschen Zeitungen. M.A. Project German Studies, Nairobi, 2004. James Ikobwa Meinungsbildungsprozesse in kenianischen und deutschen Medien. Aspekte der politischen Berichterstattungen über die Wahlkämpfe 2002 in Kenia und in Deutschland mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Leitartikel und den Karikaturen ausgewählter Zeitungen. M.A. Project in German Studies, Nairobi, 2004. Lydia Kinyatti Language as a tool of abuse against women: The case of the language of matatu touts and university students in Nairobi. Nairobi, 2003. Elizabeth A. Ochola A morpho-syntactic analysis of the Dholuo verbal system. Nairobi, 2003. Conferences/Symposia attended 27th Jul – 3rd Aug 1997 2nd World Congress of African Linguistics, Leipzig/ Germany. 25th – 27th Jul 2002 Workshop on Nilotic Languages at the University of Leipzig/Germany. 17th – 22nd Jun 2003 4th World Congress of African Linguistics (WOCAL) in New Jersey/USA. 27th Aug 2003 1st Linguistics Symposium of the Department of Linguistics and Languages at the University of Nairobi, on Linguistics in Africa. 16th – 19th Feb 2004 9th Nilo-Saharan Linguistics Colloquium, at the University of Khartoum/Sudan. 5 17th – 18th Mar 2005 DAAD Conference on Across Borders: Benefiting from Cultural Differences, University of Nairobi. 21st – 22nd Sep 2005 2nd Linguistics Symposium of the Department of Lin- guistics and Languages at the University of Nairobi, on Exploring the Linguistics of African Languages. 9th – 11th Dec 2005 Conference on Innovations and Reproductions in Cultures and Societies (IRICS) in Vienna/Austria. 17th – 19th May 2006 International Conference on Africa, Globalisation and Justice, at the Catholic University of Eastern Africa (CUEA), Centre for Social Justice and Ethics, Nairobi. 7th – 11th Aug 2006 5th World Congress of African Linguistics on African Linguistics (WOCAL) on The Age of Globalization,
Recommended publications
  • East Sudanic ʽtreeʼ on the East Sudanic Tree
    Russian State University for the Humanities Institute for Oriental and Classical Studies Center of Comparative Linguistics 10th Annual Conference on Comparative-Historical Linguistics (in memory of Sergei Starostin) George Starostin (Center for Comparative Linguistics, Institute for Oriental and Classical Studies, Russian State University for the Humanities; Laboratory of Oriental and Comparative Studies, School for Advanced Studies in the Humanities, Russian Presidential Academy) Proto-East Sudanic ʽtreeʼ on the East Sudanic tree 1 General map of Nilo-Saharan and Eastern Sudanic languages (http://www.languagesgulper.com/eng/Nilo.html) 2 «Conservative»1 lexicostatistical classification of East Sudanic with glottochronological dates (based on etymological and distributional analysis of 50-item wordlists) 1 «Conservative» implies that cognate matchings are mostly based on known phonetic correspondences or on direct consonantal class matchings between potential cognates, as opposed to a more permissive understanding of phonetic similarity («à la Greenberg»). Datings given according to Sergei Starostin's glotto- chronological formula. Tree produced by StarLing software. All wordlists compiled by G. Starostin and gradually becoming available at the Global Lexicostatistical Database (http://starling.rinet.ru/new100). 3 «Tree» in particular branches of East Sudanic2 (A) Western Nilotic Singular Plural Singular Plural Acholi yàːt -í Shilluk yɛ Dho Alur — Päri yàː Lango yàt yèn Anywa ɟ ɟ - Luo Jur Luo yen Kumam yàt yàːt-á ~ yàt-ná Belanda Bor Dop Adhola yà yèn Proto-Northern Luo *yà- *yɛ-n Proto-Southern Luo *yà- *yɛ-n Kurmuk Burun Nuer ɟiat ɟen Mayak Burun yʌn Jumjum ɟâːn ɟ - Mabaan ɟâːn- ɟân- Proto-Mabaan-Burun *ya- *yʌ-n Proto-West Nilotic *ya- *yɛ-n 2 Note: the signs - and = denote easily segmented affixes (suffixes and prefixes); italicized forms denote transparent morphological innovations by analogy.
    [Show full text]
  • Nilo-Saharan’
    11 Linguistic Features and Typologies in Languages Commonly Referred to as ‘Nilo-Saharan’ Gerrit J. Dimmendaal, Colleen Ahland, Angelika Jakobi, and Constance Kutsch Lojenga 11.1 Introduction The phylum referred to today as Nilo- Saharan (occasionally also Nilosaharan) was established by Greenberg (1963). It consists of a core of language families already argued to be genetically related in his earlier classiication of African languages (Greenberg 1955:110–114), consisting of Eastern Sudanic, Central Sudanic, Kunama, and Berta, and grouped under the name Macrosudanic; this language family was renamed Chari- Nile in his 1963 contribution after a suggestion by the Africanist William Welmers. In his 1963 classiication, Greenberg hypothesized that Nilo- Saharan consists of Chari- Nile and ive other languages or language fam- ilies treated as independent units in his earlier study: Songhay (Songhai), Saharan, Maban, Fur, and Koman (Coman). Bender (1997) also included the Kadu languages in Sudan in his sur- vey of Nilo-Saharan languages; these were classiied as members of the Kordofanian branch of Niger-Kordofanian by Greenberg (1963) under the name Tumtum. Although some progress has been made in our knowledge of the Kadu languages, they remain relatively poorly studied, and there- fore they are not further discussed here, also because actual historical evi- dence for their Nilo- Saharan afiliation is rather weak. Whereas there is a core of language groups now widely assumed to belong to Nilo- Saharan as a phylum or macro- family, the genetic afiliation of families such as Koman and Songhay is also disputed (as for the Kadu languages). For this reason, these latter groups are discussed separately from what is widely considered to form the core of Nilo- Saharan, Central Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core.
    [Show full text]
  • Occasional Papers in the Study of Sudanese Languages No
    OCCASIONAL PAPERS in the study of SUDANESE LANGUAGES No. 10 Phonology of Kakuwâ (Kakwa) Yuga Juma Onziga and Leoma Gilley......................................1 Laru Vowel Harmony Nabil Abdallah......................................................................17 Lexical and Postlexical Vowel Harmony in Fur Constance Kutsch Lojenga.....................................................35 Tennet Verb Paradigms Christine Waag and Eileen Kilpatrick....................................45 Negation Strategies in Tima Suzan Alamin........................................................................61 Number in Ama Verbs Russell Norton.......................................................................75 The Prefix /ɔ́-/ in Lumun Kinship Terms and Personal Names Heleen Smits.........................................................................95 Lumun Participant Reference in Narrative Discourse Timothy Stirtz.....................................................................115 Third Person Identification and Reference in Mündü Narrative Dorothea Jeffrey.................................................................141 OCCASIONAL PAPERS in the study of SUDANESE LANGUAGES No. 10 There are a number of institutions and individuals who are interested in research on languages in Sudan and there is a need to make research presently being done available to others. The purpose of these Occasional Papers is to serve as an outlet for work papers and other useful data which might otherwise remain in private files. We hope that Sudanese and
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Linguistics and the Comparative Study of African Languages
    Historical Linguistics and the Comparative Study of African Languages UNCORRECTED PROOFS © JOHN BENJAMINS PUBLISHING COMPANY 1st proofs UNCORRECTED PROOFS © JOHN BENJAMINS PUBLISHING COMPANY 1st proofs Historical Linguistics and the Comparative Study of African Languages Gerrit J. Dimmendaal University of Cologne John Benjamins Publishing Company Amsterdam / Philadelphia UNCORRECTED PROOFS © JOHN BENJAMINS PUBLISHING COMPANY 1st proofs TM The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American 8 National Standard for Information Sciences — Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dimmendaal, Gerrit Jan. Historical linguistics and the comparative study of African languages / Gerrit J. Dimmendaal. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. 1. African languages--Grammar, Comparative. 2. Historical linguistics. I. Title. PL8008.D56 2011 496--dc22 2011002759 isbn 978 90 272 1178 1 (Hb; alk. paper) isbn 978 90 272 1179 8 (Pb; alk. paper) isbn 978 90 272 8722 9 (Eb) © 2011 – John Benjamins B.V. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by print, photoprint, microfilm, or any other means, without written permission from the publisher. John Benjamins Publishing Company • P.O. Box 36224 • 1020 me Amsterdam • The Netherlands John Benjamins North America • P.O. Box 27519 • Philadelphia PA 19118-0519 • USA UNCORRECTED PROOFS © JOHN BENJAMINS PUBLISHING COMPANY 1st proofs Table of contents Preface ix Figures xiii Maps xv Tables
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Historical Linguistics and Genealogical Language Classification in Africa1 Tom Güldemann
    2. Historical linguistics and genealogical language classification in Africa1 Tom Güldemann 2.1. African language classification and Greenberg (1963a) 2.1.1. Introduction For quite some time, the genealogical classification of African languages has been in a peculiar situation, one which is linked intricably to Greenberg’s (1963a) study. His work is without doubt the single most important contribution in the classifi- cation history of African languages up to now, and it is unlikely to be equaled in impact by any future study. This justifies framing major parts of this survey with respect to his work. The peculiar situation referred to above concerns the somewhat strained rela- tionship between most historical linguistic research pursued by Africanists in the 1 This chapter would not have been possible without the help and collaboration of various people and institutions. First of all, I would like to thank Harald Hammarström, whose comprehensive collection of linguistic literature enormously helped my research, with whom I could fruitfully discuss numerous relevant topics, and who commented in detail on a first draft of this study. My special thanks also go to Christfried Naumann, who has drawn the maps with the initial assistence of Mike Berger. The Department of Linguistics at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology Leipzig under Bernhard Comrie supported the first stage of this research by financing two student assistents, Holger Kraft and Carsten Hesse; their work and the funding provided are gratefully acknowledged. The Humboldt University of Berlin provided the funds for organizing the relevant International Workshop “Genealogical language classification in Africa beyond Greenberg” held in Berlin in 2010 (see https://www.iaaw.hu-berlin.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical-Comparative Status of East Sudanic 1 Research History and Inventory 2 Linguistic Evidence
    1 14th Nilo-Saharan Linguistics Colloquium Department of African Studies, University of Vienna, 30 May - 1 June 2019 2 (III) Greenberg's (1963) concept today widely accepted among Africanists (but see Köhler The historical-comparative status of East Sudanic 1955, Heine 1970) albeit with revisions > Tables 1+2 Tom Güldemann - subsumes today ca. 100 languages, which represents about half of the Nilo-Saharan total Humboldt University Berlin and MPI for the Science of Human History Jena - languages partly described poorly until today > inhibits conclusive historical assessment - 10-12 lineages, currently widest consensus about 10 including extinct ancient Meroitic 1 Research history and inventory - disagreement about internal classification (I) originates in pre-Greenbergian classifications but there divergent conceptualizations: Lineage No. 1 2 3 Areal affiliation according to Güldemann (2018a) a) Westermann (1911, 1912), Struck (1911/2) establish concept: Macro-area Accretion zone - genealogical entity of Sudanic in which East(ern) is contrasted to the West(ern) 'core' (Kuliak) 3 X East Sudan-Gregory Rift - East(ern) comprises particularly Nilotic, Nubian and geographic neighbors like Kunama Taman 4 X X Chad-Ethiopia > Westermann (1935, 1940) abandons wide Sudanic concept by excluding Nilotic and Nyimang 2 X X Chad-Ethiopia Nuba Mountains doubting membership of Nubian, Kunama etc. (cf. Murray's (1920) wide "Nilotic") Nara 1 X X Chad-Ethiopia Ethiopian escarpment b) Tucker (1940) builds directly on Westermann's later views: Northern Meroitic
    [Show full text]
  • Occasional Papers in the Study of Sudanese Languages No. 11 © 2015, SIL International
    OCCASIONAL PAPERS in the study of SUDANESE LANGUAGES No. 11 Laru Locatives Nabil Abdalla...........................................................................1 The Tagoi Pronominal System Suzan Alamin ........................................................................17 Morphophonological Alternations in Tima Abeer Bashir ..........................................................................31 The Talodi Languages: A Comparative-Historical Analysis Russell Norton and Thomas Kuku Alaki ................................47 OCCASIONAL PAPERS in the study of SUDANESE LANGUAGES No. 11 There are a number of institutions and individuals who are interested in research on languages in Sudan and there is a need to make research presently being done available to others. The purpose of these Occasional Papers is to serve as an outlet for work papers and other useful data which might otherwise remain in private files. We hope that Sudanese and non-Sudanese linguists alike may profit from such a series of papers. Manuscripts for the series are welcomed. A Word document in the Charis SIL Compact font should be sent to the editor for consideration. Occasional Papers in the study of Sudanese Languages No. 11 © 2015, SIL International Address editorial correspondence to: OPSL Editor, SIL, P.O. Box 64, Juba, SOUTH SUDAN [email protected] Volumes are available for download from: http://www.sil.org/resources/publications/search/series/occasional-papers-study- sudanese-languages/work-type/journal-issue SIL International Publications, 7500 West Camp Wisdom Road, Dallas, TX 75236-5629, USA Contents of the previous volumes 1-10 are listed at the back of this volume. ii Preface to Volume 11 This 11th Occasional Papers in the study of Sudanese Languages has as its theme the Niger-Congo languages of Sudan, which are found in its Nuba Mountains region.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies in African Linguistics Volume 49 Number 1, 2020
    Studies in African Linguistics Volume 49 Number 1, 2020. Roots of Ergativity in Africa (and Beyond) Antje Casaretto, Gerrit J. Dimmendaal, Birgit Hellwig, Uta Reinöhl & Gertrud Schneider-Blum University of Cologne / University of Freiburg In the literature, it is often assumed that ergative constructions originate in passive constructions. The present contribution explores the likelihood of such a passive-to- ergative analysis for one language (Tima, Niger-Congo, Sudan), showing that this analysis cannot be substantiated and suggesting an origin in active constructions instead. This study is situated in its areal context (outlining similarities to split case marking systems across the region, especially in the Southern branch of Eastern Sudanic) and against the background of discussions in the Indo-Iranian family (from where the passive-to-ergative hypothesis presumably spread). Keywords: alignment, marked nominative, split ergativity, passive, prominence, causation, volitionality 1. Introduction Ergativity is not a common phenomenon across Africa. For example, Creissels and Good (2018: 709) remark in their recent typological survey that “[t]he ergative type of core syntactic role coding is exceptional among African languages.” The first detailed account of (split) ergativity in an African language only became available in 1988, when Andersen described such an alignment system for Päri (a Nilotic language of South Sudan).1 The following examples, taken from Andersen (1988), illustrate this phenomenon. The intransitive S argument (ùbúr ‘Ubur’ in 1) and the transitive O argument (dháagɔ̀ ‘woman’ in 2 and 3) are unmarked for case, while the transitive A argument (ùbúrrì ‘Ubur’ in 3) is marked for ergative case by means of a suffix.
    [Show full text]
  • Saharan Languages of Ethiopia
    62 International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 62-75, February 2017 The Feature of ATR and ATR Harmony in Nilo- Saharan Languages of Ethiopia Wakweya Olani Gobena PhD Candidate of Linguistics Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia Abstract. Within the prominent vowel systems in Nilo-Saharan languages, Advanced Tongue Root (ATR) feature plays significant part in the phonological system of the languages. This review attempts to assess the studies on ATR contrasts and ATR harmony in the phonetic and phonological characteristics of the languages in Ethiopia. Some of the languages with accessible study outputs were considered under analysis in this review work; based on the studies, the fundamental ATR related characteristics of the languages were provided, and the relevant discussions were made accordingly. The information from the relevant studies is presented systematically and comparatively so that the readers find it easily understood; hence, the paper will have its intended linguistic value for the further researchers and other beneficiaries. Finally, some generalizations were drawn and recommendations were forwarded. Keywordsː harmony, ATR systems, Nilo-Saharan, vowel, phonology, phonetics 1 Introduction 1.1 Background and Justification As a part of vowel system in phonological phenomena of languages, the vowel feature that is called Advanced Tongue Root (ATR) has been confirmed to be the widely attested system in Nilo-Saharan languages especially in Africa (Billington, 2014; Ko 2012; Casali, 2008). This paper attempts to provide extended definition of ATR contrast and to assess ATR harmony in some Nilo- Saharan languages in their formal and functional characteristics. Nilo-Saharan languages are spoken in eastern Africa stretching to the central and northern- half part with the speakers of about 60 million Nilotic people (2010 figure).
    [Show full text]
  • Improving African Languages Classification: Initial Investigation and Proposal
    REVISION PROPOSALS AND REPORTS Improving African Languages Classification: initial investigation and proposal Edgardo Civallero UDC Editorial Team Email: [email protected] Background The importance of languages in the UDC is consistent with the significance of linguistic facets for knowledge organization in general. Languages are the main facet category implicated in processes as crucial as the development of the Linguistics class, the organization of national and regional literatures, the categorization of human ancestries, ethnic groupings and nationalities, and the description of the language in which a document is written. Language numbers are extensively used across the entire UDC scheme, and form the basis for a faceted approach in class structuring and number building. For this reason, Common Auxiliaries of Languages (Table 1c) deserve special attention. In the 1980s, these auxiliary numbers underwent a major overhaul. The aim was to replace an obsolete, Western-biased and scientifically unacceptable language classification inherited from Dewey DC, which had attracted much criticism from experts through the history of the UDC. An improved and more detailed schedule was finally introduced in Extensions & Corrections to the UDC, 14 (3), 1989-1991, published in September 1992. The range of changes required to improve and update the old structure is evident from the outline of the old and the new classification shown in Figure 1. Pre 1992 UDC Languages Post 1992 UDC Languages =2 Western languages =1/=2 Indo-European languages =20 English =1 Indo-European languages of Europe =3 Germanic languages =2 Indo-Iranian, Nuristani and dead =4 Romance or Neo-Latin languages Indo-European languages =50 Italian =3 Caucasian & other languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Evidence for the Coherence of East Sudanic
    article⁄Morphological Evidence for the Coherence of East Sudanic author⁄Roger M. Blench abstract⁄East Sudanic is the largest and most complex branch of Nilo-Saharan. First mooted by Greenberg in 1950, who included seven branches, it was expanded in his 1963 publication to include Ama (Nyimang) and Temein and also Kuliak, not now considered part of East Sudanic. However, demonstrating the coherence of East Sudanic and justifying an internal structure for it have remained problematic. The only signicant monograph on this topic is Bender’s The East Sudanic Languages, which uses largely lexical evidence. Bender proposed a subdivision into Ek and En languages, based on pronouns. Most subsequent scholars have accepted his Ek cluster, consisting of Nubian, Nara, Ama, and Taman, but the En cluster (Surmic, E. Jebel, Temein, Daju, Nilotic) is harder to substantiate. Rilly has put forward strong arguments for the inclusion of the extinct Meroitic language as coordinate with Nubian. In the light of these diculties, the paper explores the potential for morphology to provide evidence for the coherence of East Sudanic. The paper reviews its characteristic tripartite number-marking system, consisting of singulative, plurative, and an unmarked middle term. These are associated with specic segments, the singulative in t- and plurative in k- as well as a small set of other segments, characterized by complex allomorphy. These are well preserved in some branches, fragmentary in others, and seem to have vanished completely in the Ama group, leaving only traces now fossilized in Dinik stems. The paper concludes that East Sudanic does have a common morphological system, despite its internal lexical diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Language Subareas in Ethiopia Reconsidered1
    2010 LINGUA POSNANIENSIS LII (2) doi: 10.2478/v10122-010-0017-7 LANGUAGE SUBAREAS IN ETHIOPIA RECONSIDERED1 Andrzej ZABORSKI ABST R ACT . andrzej zaborski. Language Subareas in Ethiopia Reconsidered. Lingua posnaniensis, vol. Lii (2)/2010. the poznań society for the advancement of the arts and sciences. pL issn 0079- 4740, isBn 978-83-7654-078-8, pp. 99–110 traditional terms and ideas of ‘sprachbund’ and ‘language area’ as its best english equivalent are better than ‘revisionist’ neologisms. there is a North east african macro-area including languages belonging to the afroasiatic, nilo-saharan and Bantu language families. there is an interesting phenomenon of resistance to influence and ‘borrowing’ in some realms in spite of ‘borrowing’ elsewhere in the same languages. andrzej zaborski, jagiellonian University, kraków at first i would like to emphasize that i prefer to speak not about a ‘linguistic area’ but about ‘language area’ in spite of the fact that ‘linguistic area’ was EM ENAU ’S (1956) trans- lation of TR UBET Z KOY ’S ‘sprachbund’ (1928) which is still used as a loan e.g. in french and sometimes even in english, see CA R ON & ZI M A 2006. in some languages the loan ‘sprach- bund’, plural ‘sprachbünde’ is difficult but at the same time attractive due to its ‘exotic’ spelling and pronunciation. i prefer ‘language area’ for the same reason why i do not like to speak about ‘linguistic families’ and prefer to speak about ‘language families’. ‘Linguistic’ must be associated rather with ‘linguistics’ and we know that many contemporary ‘schools’ of linguistics concentrate not so much on natural languages but rather on linguistics in a truly autistic approach.
    [Show full text]