Anaerobic Treatment of Wastewater with High Organic Content Using a Stirred Tank Reactor Coupled with a Membrane filtration Unit W
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Water Research 37 (2003) 902–908 Anaerobic treatment of wastewater with high organic content using a stirred tank reactor coupled with a membrane filtration unit W. Fuchs*, H. Binder, G. Mavrias, R. Braun IFA-Tulln, Department of Environmental Biotechnology, Konrad Lorenz Strasse 20, 3430 Tulln, Austria Received 25 October 2001; received in revised form 17 May 2002; accepted 24 May 2002 Abstract Using a cross-flow membrane bioreactor, high anaerobic conversion rates of three different types of wastewater with varying organic content were achieved. Loading rates obtained were as follows: 20 g COD LÀ1 dÀ1 for artificial wastewater, approximately 8 g COD LÀ1 dÀ1 from vegetable processing industry (sauerkraut brine) and 6–8 g COD LÀ1 dÀ1 for wastewater from an animal slaughterhouse. At stable conditions, COD-removal rates in all three wastewaters were higher than 90%. Methane yields from the treatment of artificial wastewater, sauerkraut brine, and À1 À1 animalslaughterhousewastewater were in the range of 0.17–0.30, 0.20–0.34, and 0 :1220:32Ln g COD fed, respectively. The complete retention of biomass and suspended solids is a unique feature of this treatment process, which combines a high loading capacity and at the same time, high COD removal rates even for complex wastewater containing high concentrations of particulate matter. r 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Anaerobic digestion; Membrane bioreactor; Membrane filtration; Wastewater treatment 1. Introduction SRT is required to accommodate the slower net growth rate [6,7]. On that account, biomass retention is one of Membrane filtration has gained increasing interest as the most important aspects of anaerobic technology. As a mean of biomass retention in wastewater treatment membrane filtration completely retains all microorgan- systems [1–3]. It is an efficient toolfor maintaining a isms, it can significantly improve the process [8,9]. long solids retention time (SRT) at a relatively short Moreover, the production of electric power from the hydraulic retention time (HRT). While a high SRT is generated biogas can cover the energy demand for the desirable for process stability, a short HRT minimizes filtration process. In this paper, data from laboratory the reactor volume and hence, reduces capital costs [4]. scale experiments are presented that show the advan- A rapid development can be observed on the application tages of this system in terms of volumetric loading rates, of membrane filtration in aerobic treatment plants, the effluent quality and process stability. so-called membrane bioreactors (MBRs) [5]. However, very few studies have focused on the application of this design configuration in the field of anaerobic digestion. 2. Materials and methods In anaerobic systems, microorganisms reproduce less rapidly than in aerobic systems and a longer minimum A schematic presentation of the laboratory plant used in this study is shown in Fig. 1. A stirred tank reactor *Corresponding author. Tel.: +43-2272-66280-553; fax: was coupled to an external filtration device consisting of +43-2272-66280-503. a recirculation pump and a ceramic cross-flow mem- 2 E-mail address: [email protected] (W. Fuchs). brane (material: Al2O3, surface area: 1260 cm , pore size: 0043-1354/03/$ - see front matter r 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. PII: S 0043-1354(02)00246-4 W. Fuchs et al. / Water Research 37 (2003) 902–908 903 biogas wastewater feed cross-flow filtration unit bioreactor permeate recirculation pump Fig. 1. Schematic setup of the anaerobic membrane bioreactor. Table 1 Composition of the three types of substrate used in this study Artificialwastewater Slaughterhouse effluent Sauerkraut brine COD (mg LÀ1) 9700 (29,100)a 5800–20,150 40,700–64,600 BOD (mg LÀ1) 6500 (19,500)a 2200–9800 15,800–24,200 SS (g LÀ1) 0 2.4–4.7 0.39–0.58 pH 7.1 5.3–6.8 3.2–4.2 VFA (mg LÀ1) 820 (2460)a 395–4055 6430–10,940 À1 a NH4-N (mg L ) 14 (42) 102–323 158–453 TKN (mg LÀ1) 690 (2070)a 301–460 1120–1580 a For the finalloadingrate of 20 g COD L À1 dÀ1 three-fold concentrated substrate was used. 0.2 mm). The total volume, including the filtration loop, 0.75 mm were removed by passing through a rotary sieve. was 7 L. The fixed volume in the reactor was maintained It also contained varying amounts of wastewater from by a level sensor, which controlled a valve on the the washing of equipment and premises, which caused a permeate side of the filtration unit. big variation in the concentration of organic matter. Three different types of substrates (artificialwaste- Seed sludge was taken from an anaerobic sludge water, wastewater from vegetable processing industry digester of a municipalwastewater treatment plant. (sauerkraut brine) and chicken slaughterhouse waste- Process temperature was maintained at 301C. During water) were used. Characteristics of the three types of the operation of the plant, degradation of organic wastewater are presented in Table 1. The artificial matter, pH, gas production rate and methane content of wastewater contained peptone, yeast extract, glucose, the biogas were monitored. A wet gas meter equipped acetate and sodium chloride and was freshly prepared with temperature and pressure gauges was used to twice per week. Two types of industrialwastewater were determine the amount of biogas produced. The obtained collected as individual lots from local companies and values were recalculated to standard conditions (01C, stored at 41C untiluse. Sauerkraut brine was the liquid 760 mm Hg). Methane content of the biogas was generated during the fermentation process of the determined by adsorption of CO2 in 10% KOH as shredded and salted cabbages. It was rich in organic described by Braun [10]. Parameters such as COD, components such as lactic acid, sugars and proteins and NH4–N, TKN, and SS were measured according to the contains a high degree of sodium chloride. Wastewater German standard methods for water, wastewater and from a chicken slaughterhouse was a mixture of the sludge analysis [11]. process water from the defeathering line and from the In addition, the concentration of volatile fatty acids cleaning of the guts. Particles with a size bigger than (VFA) in the reactor was also monitored. VFA (C2–C7) 904 W. Fuchs et al. / Water Research 37 (2003) 902–908 were measured using gas chromatographic analysis in 3.2. Sauerkraut brine accordance to the method reported by Chang and Sanders [12]. VFA were measured as the main indicator Figs. 4 and 5 show the response of the system using whether the system adapts to an increased organic load. sauerkraut brine wastewater. Following a short adapta- A peak concentration occurs after raising the loading tion phase, the suspended solids concentration increased rate. If the bacteria adapt to the higher loading rate, constantly from 22 to 38 g LÀ1. After 49 days, the VFA VFA concentration returns to lower values. On the concentration reached a criticalvalueof 1700 mg L À1. other hand, a continuous elevation of VFA concentra- Therefore, the volumetric loading rate was reduced from tion over severaldays indicates overloadingof the 6.3 to 4.2 to stabilize the system. Subsequently, the system. loading rate was increased again to reach a maximum volumetric loading rate of 7.93. At day 111, high concentrations of VFA were measured. As a result, the loading rate was lowered and part of the sludge was 3. Results and discussion removed from the system to keep the suspended solids concentration below 60 g LÀ1. After 160 days, sludge 3.1. Artificial wastewater was removed severaltimes to maintain a suspended solids concentration of approximately 55 g LÀ1. The To determine the response of the system under a final loading rate, which was also the maximum value controlled environment, artificial wastewater was used. achieved, was 8.6 g COD LÀ1 dÀ1. Only small concen- In this test run, volumetric loading rate (VLR) was trations of VFA were detected in the effluent at that increased in a stepwise mode. Seed sludge was added time. A high chloride concentration (6 g LÀ1), which is severaltimes into the reactor to minimize the adaptation characteristic for the sauerkraut brine, was measured in phase. At sludge concentrations of 20–25 g LÀ1,an organic loading rate as high as 20 g COD LÀ1 dÀ1 was achieved (Fig. 2). After adaptation, COD elimination 0.50 100 rates were higher than 90% and the methane yield was ) -1 0.45 90 in the range of 0:2020:30Ln of CH4 per g of COD in the 0.40 80 influent (Fig. 3). 0.35 70 .gCOD The application of membrane bioreactor was ex- 4 0.30 60 CH 0.25 50 n tended to include the anaerobic treatment of industrial 0.20 40 samples. Treatment of sauerkraut brine and chicken 0.15 30 -yield (l 0.10 20 COD-removal (%) slaughterhouse wastewater were tested at increasing 4 0.05 10 feed rates. However, the different COD concentrations CH 0.00 0 of each wastewater caused lot of fluctuations in the 0 5 10 15 20 25 organic loading rate. On the contrary to the previous Loading rate (gCOD.l-1.d-1) experiment, extra sludge was not added to the reactor after primary inoculation. Sludge was only removed Methane-yield COD-removal when the suspended solids (SS) concentration exceeded Fig. 3. Plot of volumetric loading rate against methane yield À1 60 g L and in negligible amounts, when samples were (per COD fed) and COD removalwith artificialwastewater as a taken. substrate. 30 30 2000 2000 ) 25 25 -1 1500 1500 .d ) ) -1 -1 -1 20 20 ) -1 15 15 1000 1000 10 10 SS (g.l VFA (mg.l COD (mg.l 500 500 VLR (g COD.l 5 5 0 0 0 0 020406080 020406080 (a) Time (d) (b) Time (d) Volumetric loading rate SS-reactor COD-effluent VFA-effluent Fig.