What Does the Honeybee See? and How Do We Know?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

What Does the Honeybee See? and How Do We Know? WHAT DOES THE HONEYBEE SEE? AND HOW DO WE KNOW? A CRITIQUE OF SCIENTIFIC REASON WHAT DOES THE HONEYBEE SEE? AND HOW DO WE KNOW? A CRITIQUE OF SCIENTIFIC REASON ADRIAN HORRIDGE THE AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY E PRESS E PRESS Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/honeybee_citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Author: Horridge, G. Adrian. Title: What does the honeybee see and how do we know? : a critique of scientific reason / Adrian Horridge ISBN: 9781921536984 (pbk) 9781921536991 (pdf) Subjects: Honeybee. Bees. Insects Vision Robot vision. Dewey Number: 595.799 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by Teresa Prowse, www.madebyfruitcup.com Cover image: Adrian Horridge Printed by University Printing Services, ANU This edition © 2009 ANU E Press CONTENTS About the author . .vii Preface . ix Acknowledgments . xi Introduction . xiii Chapter summary . xix Glossary . xxiii 1 . Early work by the giants . 1 2 . Theories of scientific progress: help or hindrance? . 19 3 . Research techniques and ideas, 1950 on . 39 4 . Perception of pattern, from 1950 on . 63 5 . The retina, sensitivity and resolution . 85 6 . Processing and colour vision . 117 7 . Piloting: the visual control of flight . 147 8 . The route to the goal, and back again . 177 9 . Feature detectors and cues . 207 10 . Recognition of the goal . 249 11 . Do bees see shapes? . 263 12 . Generalisation and cognitive abilities in bee vision . 283 Afterthoughts . 307 Summary of the model of bees’ visual processing . 311 Bibliography . 319 v ABOUT THE AUTHOR Adrian Horridge was appointed in 1960 as Director of the Gatty Marine Laboratory, St Andrews, Scotland, while completing the two-volume work with Professor T. H. Bullock of the University of California on The Structure and Function of the Nervous Systems of Invertebrates (1965). At St Andrews, he started a research group that worked on the eyes of crustaceans and insects. In 1969, he brought this group with him to Australia, when he was appointed as one of four foundation professors of the Research School of Biological Sciences at The Australian National University. Since that time, he and his numerous students and postdoctoral collaborators have discovered much about the vision of insects. In 1969, Horridge was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society of London and in 1972 a Fellow of the Australian Academy of Sciences. vii PREFACE The unique and self-contained topic ‘The vision of the bee’ is of interest in its own right as the best-known example of what a typical medium-sized insect can detect with its eyes. It is also a topic of philosophical interest because it raises centuries-old questions about perception, consciousness, sentient beings, human uniqueness and insect-like robots. What does the bee really see? How does the small brain of the bee see so well? How does this influence our ideas about perception, automata and future practical applications? There are many ways to answer these questions. Bees assist us because they can be trained to come to objects or patterns, and trained bees will answer questions put to them in simple tests. The bee’s visual system is also open to analysis by optical, anatomical and electrophysiological methods, by tracking the bees while navigating and route finding and also by studying visual flight control as they pilot themselves between obstacles. This book includes a historical survey of how scientists have approached, experimented with and argued about insect vision for 100 years, finally rejecting anthropomorphism and solving some critical questions. One of the features is the (still-imperfect) coverage of the German contribution to the subject. Until about 1966, insect vision was scarcely mentioned in books in English. The older work was ignored, while the more recent contributions were controversial and unrelated to each other. There was little study of the topic in England and textbooks made a hash of it. This particular science is grounded in observation and logic. There is little mathematics, chemistry or physics involved or need for great learning. Bees are found worldwide and are reasonably representative of all large insects. Research on bee vision can be very cheap. The results have mostly been published but the story is not generally known or even available to the educated public. Here now is an account of what bees really detect with their eyes and how scientists found this out. The accounts of earlier experiments on this road of discovery, and how inferences were made from the data, make a fascinating account of the arguments and counterclaims of contending professors. The approach here is out-and-out support for experiment, backed by the logic of John Stuart Mill and the philosophy of scientific progress of Thomas S. Kuhn. The processes of designing the experiments and inferring the conclusions from the data make a ix WhAT DoES ThE honEyBEE SEE AnD hoW Do WE knoW? miniature picture of scientific effort in several areas of biology, physiology and comparative psychology. They illustrate how the work was really conducted— not always amicably. The basis of this study is the observation of the performance of bees. From the performance, an intuitive inference was usually made, as a stab at explaining the behaviour. Often, the inference was incorrect because the vision of bees was counter-intuitive in several ways. Explanations made by analogy with mammalian visual systems or drawn from the terminology of the cognitive sciences were usually found to be inadequate. There were many examples of excellent observations and reliable data, from which a wrong inference was made, followed by argument without new data, stubborn resistance to reinterpretation and refusal to accept advances made by others. Later, the mechanisms of the performance were analysed by extensive testing of trained bees and, after much thought, the counter-intuitive processing mechanisms of bees’ strange visual behaviour were slowly revealed. The whole subject became an exposition of the stages of visual processing. Bees do not see shapes or objects; they detect parameters and recognise places. This story is told as an example of how early intuitive inferences have given way to the results of carefully designed tests of trained bees. The book is intended for an audience who do not want a text crowded with references and every fact that exists. The aim is for it to be read more like an essay for anyone with some scientific background. It describes the process of scientific discovery on a limited theme, with two excursions into branches of the subject in more detail: the action of the retina and processing by the nerve cells (Chapters 5 and 6). For all chapters, there are sufficient names of researchers given for anybody who wishes to dig deeper, using the extensive bibliography. This book could be used by university students interested in subjects such as vision for physiologists, perception for psychologists, insects for entomologists or zoologists, robot vision for engineers looking for new ideas and scientific method for philosophers. x ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I acknowledge with enormous gratitude the contributions of those ancient institutions, St Johns College, Cambridge, where I was for 10 years absorbing a myriad influences from curious role models, and the University of St Andrews, where I learned to stand on my own feet, and where the work on insect vision began during 13 years at the Gatty Marine Laboratory. At Yale and the University of California, I was introduced to research financed by grants. Then at The Australian National University, I was able to expand with my research group on my own broad topic that seemed scientifically interesting: insect vision. Second, I thank the great number of colleagues, who worked with and near me, aided by technical staff, librarians and secretaries. I depended on their support. I owe a particular debt of gratitude to the numerous enthusiastic colleagues who made good use of the plentiful equipment, made scientific advances and mostly published their own work on insect vision. Their names appear throughout this book. Some, in particular, stand out: Tudor Barnard, Malcomb Burrows, John Scholes, Steve Shaw, Rick Butler, Ben Walcott, Ayis Ioannides, Ian Meinertzhagen and David Sandeman. In Canberra: Simon Laughlin, Allan Snyder, Andreas Dubs, Randolf Menzel, Gert Stange, Benno Meyer-Rochow, Ted Maddess, Fred Doujak, Peter Lillywhite, Jenny Kien, David Williams, Roger Hardy, Yasuo Tsukahara, Keiichi Mimura, Mark Leggett, Dan-Eric Nilsson, Mike Land, Stjepan Marčelja, Willi Ribi, Martin Wilson, Richard Payne, Roger Dubois, Doukele Stavenga, David O’Carroll, Tom Matic, Shi Jian, Jan Dalczynski, Peter McIntyre, Qijian Sun, Yang En-Cheng, Danny Osorio, Joe Howard, Mandyam Srinivasan, Tony Heyes, Andrew James, Zhang Shaowu, Miriam Lehrer, Eric Warrant, Mike Ibbotson and Neville Fletcher. There is especial gratitude to the assistants who worked with me, sometimes for many years—notably, Margaret Lang, Charlie Roemmele, Margaret Canny, Bob Jackson, Caroline Giddings, Miriam MacLean, Roland Jahnke, Jadviga Duniec, Ljerka Marčelja, Edyta Kucharska, Sasha Neist, Steve Lucock and Virginia Pierce—and to secretaries (before they became extinct): Veronique, Tess, Tiger Lily, Elizabeth and Margaret. Finally, I owe an infinite debt of gratitude to Audrey, the loving woman I married 55 years ago, who cared for me and four children, in a family life that was full of interest, culture and generosity. xi INTRODUCTION Small in size but high among the wonders of nature, insects delight and amaze us with their skill in flight and their obvious ability to see.
Recommended publications
  • Eric Kandel Form in Which This Information Is Stored
    RESEARCH I NEWS pendent, this system would be expected to [2] HEEsch and J E Bums. Distance estimation work quite well, since the new recruit bees by foraging honeybees, The Journal ofExperi­ mental Biology, Vo1.199, pp. 155-162, 1996. tend to take the same route as the experi­ [3] M V Srinivasan, S W Zhang, M Lehrer, and T enced scout bee. What dOJhe ants do when S Collett, Honeybee Navigation en route to they cover similarly several kilometres on the goal: Visual flight control and odometry, foot to look for food? Preliminary evidence The Journal ofExperimental Biology, Vol. 199, pp. 237-244, 1996. indicates that they don't use an odometer but [4] M V Srinivasan, S W Zhang, M Altwein, and instead might count steps! J Tautz, Honeybee Navigation: Nature and Calibration of the Odometer, Science, Vol. Suggested Reading 287, pp. 851-853, 1996. [1] Karl von Frisch, The dance language and OT­ Moushumi Sen Sarma, Centre for Ecological Sci­ ientation of bees, Harvard Univ. Press, Cam­ ences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, bridge, MA, USA, 1993. India. Email: [email protected] Learning from a Sea Snail: modify future behaviour, then memory is the Eric Kandel form in which this information is stored. Together, they represent one of the most valuable and powerful adaptations ever to Rohini Balakrishnan have evolved in nervous systems, for they In the year 2000, Eric Kandel shared the allow the future to access the past, conferring Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicinel flexibility to behaviour and improving the with two other neurobiologists: Arvid chances of survival in unpredictable, rapidly Carlsson and Paul Greengard.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction and Historical Perspective
    Chapter 1 Introduction and Historical Perspective “ Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. ” modified by the developmental history of the organism, Theodosius Dobzhansky its physiology – from cellular to systems levels – and by the social and physical environment. Finally, behaviors are shaped through evolutionary forces of natural selection OVERVIEW that optimize survival and reproduction ( Figure 1.1 ). Truly, the study of behavior provides us with a window through Behavioral genetics aims to understand the genetic which we can view much of biology. mechanisms that enable the nervous system to direct Understanding behaviors requires a multidisciplinary appropriate interactions between organisms and their perspective, with regulation of gene expression at its core. social and physical environments. Early scientific The emerging field of behavioral genetics is still taking explorations of animal behavior defined the fields shape and its boundaries are still being defined. Behavioral of experimental psychology and classical ethology. genetics has evolved through the merger of experimental Behavioral genetics has emerged as an interdisciplin- psychology and classical ethology with evolutionary biol- ary science at the interface of experimental psychology, ogy and genetics, and also incorporates aspects of neuro- classical ethology, genetics, and neuroscience. This science ( Figure 1.2 ). To gain a perspective on the current chapter provides a brief overview of the emergence of definition of this field, it is helpful
    [Show full text]
  • Mitochondrial Genomes Resolve the Phylogeny of Adephaga
    1 Mitochondrial genomes resolve the phylogeny 2 of Adephaga (Coleoptera) and confirm tiger 3 beetles (Cicindelidae) as an independent family 4 Alejandro López-López1,2,3 and Alfried P. Vogler1,2 5 1: Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, UK 6 2: Department of Life Sciences, Silwood Park Campus, Imperial College London, Ascot SL5 7PY, UK 7 3: Departamento de Zoología y Antropología Física, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Murcia, Campus 8 Mare Nostrum, 30100, Murcia, Spain 9 10 Corresponding author: Alejandro López-López ([email protected]) 11 12 Abstract 13 The beetle suborder Adephaga consists of several aquatic (‘Hydradephaga’) and terrestrial 14 (‘Geadephaga’) families whose relationships remain poorly known. In particular, the position 15 of Cicindelidae (tiger beetles) appears problematic, as recent studies have found them either 16 within the Hydradephaga based on mitogenomes, or together with several unlikely relatives 17 in Geadeadephaga based on 18S rRNA genes. We newly sequenced nine mitogenomes of 18 representatives of Cicindelidae and three ground beetles (Carabidae), and conducted 19 phylogenetic analyses together with 29 existing mitogenomes of Adephaga. Our results 20 support a basal split of Geadephaga and Hydradephaga, and reveal Cicindelidae, together 21 with Trachypachidae, as sister to all other Geadephaga, supporting their status as Family. We 22 show that alternative arrangements of basal adephagan relationships coincide with increased 23 rates of evolutionary change and with nucleotide compositional bias, but these confounding 24 factors were overcome by the CAT-Poisson model of PhyloBayes. The mitogenome + 18S 25 rRNA combined matrix supports the same topology only after removal of the hypervariable 26 expansion segments.
    [Show full text]
  • Biography (Modified, After Festetics 1983)
    Konrad Lorenz’s Biography (modified, after Festetics 1983) 1903: Konrad Zacharias Lorenz (KL) was born in Altenberg /Austria on Nov. 7 as the last of three children of Emma Lorenz and Dr. Adolf Lorenz, professor for orthopedics at the Medical branch of the University of Vienna. In the same year the representative and spacious Altenberg family home was finished. 1907: KL starts keeping animals, such as spotted newts in aquaria, raises some ducklings and is not pleased by his first experiences with a dachshound. Niko Tinbergen, his lifelong colleague and friend, is born on April 15 in Den Haag, The Netherlands. 1909: KL enters elementary school and engages in systematic studies in crustaceans. 1910: Oskar Heinroth, biologist and founder of "Vergleichende Verhaltensforschung" (comparative ethology) from Berlin and fatherlike scientific mentor of the young KL publishes his classical paper on the ethology of ducks. 1915: KL enters highschool (Schottengymnasium Wien), keeps and breeds songbirds. 1918: Wallace Craig publishes the comparative ethology of Columbidae (pigeons), a classics of late US biologist Charles O. Whitman, who was like O. Heinroth, a founding father of comparative ethology. 1921: KL excels in his final exams. Together with friend Bernhard Hellmann, he observes and experiments with aggression in a cichlid (Herichthys cyanoguttatum). This was the base for KL's psychohydraulic model of motivation. 1922: Father Adolf sends KL to New York to take 2 semesters of medicine courses at the ColumbiaUniversity, but mainly to interrupt the relationship of KL with longterm girlfriend Gretl Gebhart, his later wife. This paternal attempt to influence the mate choice of KL failed.
    [Show full text]
  • A Genus-Level Supertree of Adephaga (Coleoptera) Rolf G
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 7 (2008) 255–269 www.elsevier.de/ode A genus-level supertree of Adephaga (Coleoptera) Rolf G. Beutela,Ã, Ignacio Riberab, Olaf R.P. Bininda-Emondsa aInstitut fu¨r Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, FSU Jena, Germany bMuseo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid, Spain Received 14 October 2005; accepted 17 May 2006 Abstract A supertree for Adephaga was reconstructed based on 43 independent source trees – including cladograms based on Hennigian and numerical cladistic analyses of morphological and molecular data – and on a backbone taxonomy. To overcome problems associated with both the size of the group and the comparative paucity of available information, our analysis was made at the genus level (requiring synonymizing taxa at different levels across the trees) and used Safe Taxonomic Reduction to remove especially poorly known species. The final supertree contained 401 genera, making it the most comprehensive phylogenetic estimate yet published for the group. Interrelationships among the families are well resolved. Gyrinidae constitute the basal sister group, Haliplidae appear as the sister taxon of Geadephaga+ Dytiscoidea, Noteridae are the sister group of the remaining Dytiscoidea, Amphizoidae and Aspidytidae are sister groups, and Hygrobiidae forms a clade with Dytiscidae. Resolution within the species-rich Dytiscidae is generally high, but some relations remain unclear. Trachypachidae are the sister group of Carabidae (including Rhysodidae), in contrast to a proposed sister-group relationship between Trachypachidae and Dytiscoidea. Carabidae are only monophyletic with the inclusion of a non-monophyletic Rhysodidae, but resolution within this megadiverse group is generally low. Non-monophyly of Rhysodidae is extremely unlikely from a morphological point of view, and this group remains the greatest enigma in adephagan systematics.
    [Show full text]
  • Balcomk41251.Pdf (558.9Kb)
    Copyright by Karen Suzanne Balcom 2005 The Dissertation Committee for Karen Suzanne Balcom Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Discovery and Information Use Patterns of Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine Committee: E. Glynn Harmon, Supervisor Julie Hallmark Billie Grace Herring James D. Legler Brooke E. Sheldon Discovery and Information Use Patterns of Nobel Laureates in Physiology or Medicine by Karen Suzanne Balcom, B.A., M.L.S. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August, 2005 Dedication I dedicate this dissertation to my first teachers: my father, George Sheldon Balcom, who passed away before this task was begun, and to my mother, Marian Dyer Balcom, who passed away before it was completed. I also dedicate it to my dissertation committee members: Drs. Billie Grace Herring, Brooke Sheldon, Julie Hallmark and to my supervisor, Dr. Glynn Harmon. They were all teachers, mentors, and friends who lifted me up when I was down. Acknowledgements I would first like to thank my committee: Julie Hallmark, Billie Grace Herring, Jim Legler, M.D., Brooke E. Sheldon, and Glynn Harmon for their encouragement, patience and support during the nine years that this investigation was a work in progress. I could not have had a better committee. They are my enduring friends and I hope I prove worthy of the faith they have always showed in me. I am grateful to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Spontaneous Generation & Origin of Life Concepts from Antiquity to The
    SIMB News News magazine of the Society for Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology April/May/June 2019 V.69 N.2 • www.simbhq.org Spontaneous Generation & Origin of Life Concepts from Antiquity to the Present :ŽƵƌŶĂůŽĨ/ŶĚƵƐƚƌŝĂůDŝĐƌŽďŝŽůŽŐLJΘŝŽƚĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐLJ Impact Factor 3.103 The Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology is an international journal which publishes papers in metabolic engineering & synthetic biology; biocatalysis; fermentation & cell culture; natural products discovery & biosynthesis; bioenergy/biofuels/biochemicals; environmental microbiology; biotechnology methods; applied genomics & systems biotechnology; and food biotechnology & probiotics Editor-in-Chief Ramon Gonzalez, University of South Florida, Tampa FL, USA Editors Special Issue ^LJŶƚŚĞƚŝĐŝŽůŽŐLJ; July 2018 S. Bagley, Michigan Tech, Houghton, MI, USA R. H. Baltz, CognoGen Biotech. Consult., Sarasota, FL, USA Impact Factor 3.500 T. W. Jeffries, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA 3.000 T. D. Leathers, USDA ARS, Peoria, IL, USA 2.500 M. J. López López, University of Almeria, Almeria, Spain C. D. Maranas, Pennsylvania State Univ., Univ. Park, PA, USA 2.000 2.505 2.439 2.745 2.810 3.103 S. Park, UNIST, Ulsan, Korea 1.500 J. L. Revuelta, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain 1.000 B. Shen, Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, USA 500 D. K. Solaiman, USDA ARS, Wyndmoor, PA, USA Y. Tang, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA E. J. Vandamme, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium H. Zhao, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA 10 Most Cited Articles Published in 2016 (Data from Web of Science: October 15, 2018) Senior Author(s) Title Citations L. Katz, R. Baltz Natural product discovery: past, present, and future 103 Genetic manipulation of secondary metabolite biosynthesis for improved production in Streptomyces and R.
    [Show full text]
  • ISN - March, 1998 Newsletter
    ISN - March, 1998 Newsletter http://neuroethology.org/newsletter/news_archive/isn.news.mar98.html Newsletter March 1998 International Society for Neuroethology c/o Panacea Associates phone/fax: +001 (850) 894-3480 744 Duparc Circle E-mail: [email protected] Tallahassee FL 32312 USA Website: www.neurobio.arizona.edu/isn/ LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT With the arrival of a new year, an important transition began for the ISN. After many months of negotiations and planning, the ISN began a partnership with professional society managers, Panacea Associates (PA) of Tallahassee, Florida. PA is a small enterprise operated by Susan Lampman and Patricia Meredith, both of whom have had extensive experience in conference services, management of professional organizations, etc. PA has been managing the Association for Chemoreception Sciences (AChemS) for many years, and in that capacity they have earned a fine reputation for efficient and attentive service tailored to the needs of the organization. For a trial period of two years, most of the routine management operations of the ISN will be handled by PA. These services will be phased in over the next few months. For example, please notice that the membership form published in every issue of this Newsletter has changed. All completed membership forms, with payment as appropriate, should be mailed to the ISN at its new business address: International Society for Neuroethology, c/o Panacea Associates, 744 Duparc Circle, Tallahassee FL 32312, USA The ISN's new business phone/fax number is +001 (850) 894-3480, and its new business E-mail address is [email protected]. The URL of the ISN's Website will remain unchanged: www.neurobio.arizona.edu/isn/ I hope you have discovered by now that a searchable version of the ISN's Membership Directory is available at the Website.
    [Show full text]
  • Gerald Edelman - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Gerald Edelman - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Gerald Edelman From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Main page Gerald Maurice Edelman (born July 1, 1929) is an Contents American biologist who shared the 1972 Nobel Prize in Gerald Maurice Edelman Featured content Physiology or Medicine for work with Rodney Robert Born July 1, 1929 (age 83) Current events Porter on the immune system.[1] Edelman's Nobel Prize- Ozone Park, Queens, New York Nationality Random article winning research concerned discovery of the structure of American [2] Fields Donate to Wikipedia antibody molecules. In interviews, he has said that the immunology; neuroscience way the components of the immune system evolve over Alma Ursinus College, University of Interaction the life of the individual is analogous to the way the mater Pennsylvania School of Medicine Help components of the brain evolve in a lifetime. There is a Known for immune system About Wikipedia continuity in this way between his work on the immune system, for which he won the Nobel Prize, and his later Notable Nobel Prize in Physiology or Community portal work in neuroscience and in philosophy of mind. awards Medicine in 1972 Recent changes Contact Wikipedia Contents [hide] Toolbox 1 Education and career 2 Nobel Prize Print/export 2.1 Disulphide bonds 2.2 Molecular models of antibody structure Languages 2.3 Antibody sequencing 2.4 Topobiology 3 Theory of consciousness Беларуская 3.1 Neural Darwinism Български 4 Evolution Theory Català 5 Personal Deutsch 6 See also Español 7 References Euskara 8 Bibliography Français 9 Further reading 10 External links Hrvatski Ido Education and career [edit] Bahasa Indonesia Italiano Gerald Edelman was born in 1929 in Ozone Park, Queens, New York to Jewish parents, physician Edward Edelman, and Anna Freedman Edelman, who worked in the insurance industry.[3] After עברית Kiswahili being raised in New York, he attended college in Pennsylvania where he graduated magna cum Nederlands laude with a B.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1973 Nobel Prize for Physiology Or Medicine
    RESEARCH NEWS The 1973 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine The 1973 Nobel prize for Physiology rel.ated flowers. His thorough experi- leading students. When a colony of bees or Medicine has been awarded jointly ments in the 1920's settled in the af- is swarming, scouts fly out from the to three zoologists: Karl von Frisch, firmative the long-standing question teeming cluster of bees that have left 86 years old, of the University of Mu- whether fish could hear. Unsophisti- their former hive and search for a nich; Konrad Lorenz, 69 years old, of cated in the best sense, these experi- cavity where thousands, of bees can the Max Planck Institute for Behavioral ments have been amply confirmed in fly to establish a new colony. When a Physiology at Seewiesen, near Munich; later years with appropriate monochro- scout has located a suitable cavity, she and Nikolaas Tinbergen, 66 years old, mators and hydrophones. An ardent signals its location by the same dance of the Department of Zoology at Ox- Darwinian who successfully defended pattern used for food. Individual bees ford University, for their discoveries his views at his oral examination in exchange information about the suit- concerning organization and elicitation philosophy against a professor who did ability and location of various cavities, of individual and social behavior pat- not believe in evolution, von Frisch sometimes the same bee acting alter- terns. The award is a new departure was motivated by a naturalist's faith nately as transmitter and receiver of for the Nobel Committee of the Karo- that phenomena such as the colors and information.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Classification of Cucujoidea and the Recognition of A
    Systematic Entomology (2015), 40, 745–778 DOI: 10.1111/syen.12138 Phylogeny and classification of Cucujoidea and the recognition of a new superfamily Coccinelloidea (Coleoptera: Cucujiformia) JAMES A. ROBERTSON1,2,ADAM SL´ I P I NS´ K I3, MATTHEW MOULTON4, FLOYD W. SHOCKLEY5, ADRIANO GIORGI6, NATHAN P. LORD4, DUANE D. MCKENNA7, WIOLETTA TOMASZEWSKA8, JUANITA FORRESTER9, KELLY B. MILLER10, MICHAEL F. WHITING4 andJOSEPH V. MCHUGH2 1Department of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, U.S.A., 2Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, U.S.A., 3Australian National Insect Collection, CSIRO, Canberra, Australia, 4Department of Biology and M. L. Bean Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, U.S.A., 5Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, U.S.A., 6Faculdade de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Altamira, Brasil, 7Department of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, U.S.A., 8Museum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warszawa, Poland, 9Chattahoochee Technical College, Canton, GA, U.S.A. and 10Department of Biology and Museum of Southwestern Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, U.S.A. Abstract. A large-scale phylogenetic study is presented for Cucujoidea (Coleoptera), a diverse superfamily of beetles that historically has been taxonomically difficult. This study is the most comprehensive analysis of cucujoid taxa to date, with DNA sequence data sampled from eight genes (four nuclear, four mitochondrial) for 384 coleopteran taxa, including exemplars of 35 (of 37) families and 289 genera of Cucujoidea. Maximum-likelihood analyses of these data present many significant relationships, some proposed previously and some novel.
    [Show full text]
  • ZOOLOGIE 2007 ZOOLOGIE 2007 Herausgegeben Von Mitteilungen Rudolf Alexander Steinbrecht Der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft
    Umschlag_Zoologie_2007.qxd 27.08.2007 11:14 Seite 1 ZOOLOGIE 2007 ZOOLOGIE 2007 Herausgegeben von Mitteilungen Rudolf Alexander Steinbrecht der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft . Mitteilungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft Mitteilungen 99. Jahresversammlung Münster 16. – 20. September 2006 Biohistoricum · Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig · Bonn Basilisken-Presse · Marburg an der Lahn ZOOLOGIE 2007 Mitteilungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft Herausgegeben von Rudolf Alexander Steinbrecht 99. Jahresversammlung Münster 16.-20. September 2007 Basilisken-Presse Marburg an der Lahn 2007 Umschlagbild Gedächtnisspuren im Fliegengehirn. Markante Nervenzellen im Zentralkomplex, die sich in zwei etwa waagerechten Schichten verzweigen, speichern Gedächtnisspuren aus einem Lernversuch (vgl. Beitrag Heisenberg, Abb. 4). Werte für die Höhe der Muster sind in den rot dargestellten, Werte für die Neigung der Musterkanten in den grün gezeigten Zellen gespeichert. Vermutlich durch diese Verzweigungen können Fliegen visuelle Muster, die sie an einer Stelle gelernt haben, an jeder Stelle des Sehfeldes wieder erkennen (Bild: Arnim Jenett und Martin Heisenberg). Die Mitteilungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft erscheinen einmal jährlich. Einzelhefte sind bei der Geschäftsstelle (Corneliusstr. 6, 80469 München), zum Preis von 7,00 € erhältlich. Gesamtherstellung Danuvia Druckhaus Neuburg GmbH, Nördliche Grünauer Str. 53 86633 Neuburg an der Donau Copyright 2007 by Basilisken-Presse Marburg an der Lahn Printed in Bundesrepublik Deutschland ISSN 0070-4342 ISBN 978-3-925347-92-4 Inhalt Diethard Tautz 5 Ansprache des Präsidenten der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft Franz Huber 9 Laudatio zur Verleihung der Ehrenmit- gliedschaft in der Deutschen Zoologi- schen Gesellschaft an Dr.rer.nat.Dr. h.c. mult. Rüdiger Wehner, Professor Emeritus und vormals Direktor am Zoologischen Institut der Universität Zürich Klaus Peter Sauer 13 Laudatio zur Verleihung der Ehrenmit- gliedschaft in der Deutschen Zoologi- schen Gesellschaft an Dr.
    [Show full text]