DOCSLIB.ORG

The 100 Most Influential Scientists of All Time / Edited by Kara Rogers.—1St Ed

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The 100 Most Influential Scientists of All Time / Edited by Kara Rogers.—1St Ed Published in 2010 by Britannica Educational Publishing (a trademark of Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.) in association with Rosen Educational Services, LLC 29 East 21st Street, New York, NY 10010. Copyright © 2010 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. Britannica, Encyclopædia Britannica, and the Thistle logo are registered trademarks of Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. All rights reserved. Rosen Educational Services materials copyright © 2010 Rosen Educational Services, LLC. All rights reserved. Distributed exclusively by Rosen Educational Services. For a listing of additional Britannica Educational Publishing titles, call toll free (800) 237-9932. First Edition Britannica Educational Publishing Michael I. Levy: Executive Editor Marilyn L. Barton: Senior Coordinator, Production Control Steven Bosco: Director, Editorial Technologies Lisa S. Braucher: Senior Producer and Data Editor Yvette Charboneau: Senior Copy Editor Kathy Nakamura: Manager, Media Acquisition Kara Rogers: Senior Editor, Biomedical Sciences Rosen Educational Services Jeanne Nagle: Senior Editor Nelson Sá: Art Director Introduction by Kristi Lew Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The 100 most influential scientists of all time / edited by Kara Rogers.—1st ed. p. cm.—(The Britannica guide to the world’s most influential people) “In association with Britannica Educational Publishing, Rosen Educational Services.” Includes index. ISBN 978-1-61530-040-2 (eBook) 1. Science—Popular works. 2. Science—History—Popular works. 3. Scientists— Biography—Popular works. I. Rogers, Kara. II. Title: One hundred influential scientists of all time. Q162.A15 2010 509.2'2—dc22 2009026069 On the cover: Discoveries such as Einstein’s theory of relativity—shown in original manuscript form—are hallmarks of the genius exhibited by the world’s most influential scientists. Jon Levy/AFP/Getty Images CONTENTS Introduction 8 Asclepius 17 Hippocrates 18 Aristotle 22 Pliny the Elder 26 Ptolemy 29 Galen of Pergamum 32 Avicenna 36 Roger Bacon 37 Leonardo da Vinci 40 Nicolaus Copernicus 46 30 Paracelsus 50 Andreas Vesalius 54 Tycho Brahe 57 65 Giordano Bruno 59 Galileo 63 Johannes Kepler 69 William Harvey 74 Robert Boyle 79 Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 81 Robert Hooke 84 John Ray 85 Sir Isaac Newton 88 Carolus Linnaeus 93 90 Henry Cavendish 97 Joseph Priestley 101 Luigi Galvani 105 Sir William Herschel 108 Antoine-Laurent Lavoisier 112 Pierre-Simon Laplace 116 Edward Jenner 120 John Dalton 123 Georges Cuvier 126 Alexander von Humboldt 129 André-Marie Ampère 134 186 Amedeo Avogadro 138 Joseph-Louis Gay-Lussac 142 Sir Humphry Davy 145 Jöns Jacob Berzelius 149 John James Audubon 154 Michael Faraday 155 Sir Charles Lyell 162 Louis Agassiz 164 Charles Darwin 167 Sir Francis Galton 175 Gregor Mendel 178 Louis Pasteur 183 Alfred Russel Wallace 189 William Thomson 192 Joseph Lister 195 James Clerk Maxwell 199 Dmitry Ivanovich Mendeleyev 202 Ivan Petrovich Pavlov 205 A.A. Michelson 208 Robert Koch 211 Sigmund Freud 215 Max Planck 222 Nettie Maria Stevens 226 William Bateson 227 Pierre Curie 228 Marie Curie 231 Henrietta Swan Leavitt 235 Ernest Rutherford 237 Carl Jung 242 Albert Einstein 244 Alfred Lothar Wegener 252 Sir Alexander Fleming 253 Niels Bohr 256 247 Erwin Schrödinger 260 Selman Abraham Waksman 263 296 Edwin Powell Hubble 264 Linus Pauling 267 Enrico Fermi 271 Margaret Mead 276 Barbara McClintock 278 Leakey Family 280 George Gamow 285 J. Robert Oppenheimer 287 Hans Bethe 291 Maria Goeppert Mayer 294 Rachel Carson 295 Jacques-Yves Cousteau 297 Luis W. Alvarez 300 Alan M. Turing 302 Norman Ernest Borlaug 306 Jonas Edward Salk 308 Sir Fred Hoyle 310 Francis Harry Compton Crick 311 James Dewey Watson 313 Richard P. Feynman 315 307 Rosalind Franklin 318 Edward O. Wilson 320 Jane Goodall 323 Sir Harold W. Kroto 325 Richard E. Smalley 326 Robert F. Curl, Jr. 327 Stephen Jay Gould 328 Stephen W. Hawking 330 J. Craig Venter 332 Francis Collins 335 Steven Pinker 337 Glossary 339 For Further Reading 341 Index 343 330 INTRODUCTION 7 Introduction 7 In science the credit goes to the man who convinces the world, not to the man to whom the idea first occurs. —Francis Darwin (1848–1925) rom the very first moment humans appeared on the Fplanet, we have attempted to understand and explain the world around us. The most insatiably curious among us often have become scientists. The scientists discussed in this book have shaped humankind’s knowledge and laid the foundation for virtu- ally every scientific discipline, from basic biology to black holes. Some of these individuals were inclined to ponder questions about what was contained within the human body, while others were intrigued by celestial bodies. Their collective vision has been concentrated enough to exam- ine microscopic particles and broad enough to unlock tremendous universal marvels such as gravity, relativity— even the nature of life itself. Acknowledgement of their importance comes from a variety of knowledgeable and well-respected sources; luminaries such as Isaac Asimov and noted biochemist Marcel Florkin have written biogra- phies contained herein. The influence wielded by the profiled men and women within the realm of scientific discovery becomes readily apparent as the reader delves deeper into each individual’s life and contributions to his or her chosen field. Oftentimes, more than one field has been the beneficiary of these bril- liant minds. Many early scientists studied several different branches of science during their lifetimes. Indeed, as the founder of formal logic and the study of chemistry, biol- ogy, physics, zoology, botany, psychology, history, and literary theory in the Middle Ages, Aristotle is considered one of the greatest thinkers in history. Breakthroughs in the medical sciences have been numerous and extremely valuable. Study in this discipline 9 7 The 100 Most Influential Scientists of All Time 7 begins with a contemporary of Aristotle’s named Hippocrates, who is commonly regarded as the “father of medicine.” Perhaps Hippocrates’ most enduring legacy to the field is the Hippocratic Oath, the ethical code that doctors still abide by today. By taking the Hippocratic Oath, doctors pledge to Asclepius, the Greco-Roman god of medicine, that to the best of their knowledge and abili- ties, they will prescribe the best course of medical care for their patients. They also promise to, above all, cause no harm to any patient. The Greeks were not the only ones studying medi- cine. The Muslim scholar Avicenna also advanced the discipline by writing one of the most influential medical texts in history, The Canon of Medicine. Avicenna also pro- duced an encyclopedic volume describing Aristotle’s philosophic and scientific thoughts about logic, biology, psychology, geometry, astronomy, music, and metaphys- ics. This hefty tome was called the Kitāb al-shifā (“Book of Healing”). About 450 years later, a German-Swiss physi- cian named Philippus Aureolus Theophrastus Bombastus Von Hohenheim, or Paracelsus, once again advanced medical science by integrating medicine with chemistry and linking specific diseases to medications that could treat them. The Renaissance period brought to light the scientific genius of painter and sculptor Leonardo da Vinci. His drawings of presciently detailed flying machines preceded the advent of human flight by more than 300 years. What’s more, da Vinci’s drawings of the human anatomy struc- ture not only illuminated many of the body’s features and functions, they also laid the foundation for modern scien- tific illustration. Anatomical drawings were also the purview of Flemish physician Andreas Vesalius. Unlike da Vinci’s illustrations, 10 7 Introduction 7 which were mainly for his own artistic education, Vesalius incorporated his sketches and the explanations of them into the first anatomy textbook. His observations of human anatomy also helped to advance physiology, the study of the way the body functions. Other physicians took their investigation of anatomy off the page and onto the operating table. Ancient Greek physician Galen of Pergamum greatly influenced the study of medicine by performing countless autopsies on mon- keys, pigs, sheep, and goats. His observations allowed him to ascertain the functions of the nervous system and note the difference between arteries and veins. Galen was also able to dispel the notion that arteries carry air, an idea that had persisted for 400 years. Centuries later, in the 1600s, Englishman William Harvey built on Galen’s theories and observations, and helped lay the foundation for modern physiology with his numerous animal dissections. As a result of his work, Harvey was the first person to describe the function of the circulatory system, providing evidence that veins and arteries had separate and distinct functions. Before his realization that the heart acts as a pump that keeps blood flowing throughout the body, people thought that con- strictions of the blood vessels caused the blood to move. Other groundbreaking scientists have relied on obser- vations outside the body. A gifted Dutch scientist and lens grinder named Antonie van Leeuwenhoek refined the main tool of his trade, the microscope, which allowed him to become the first person to observe tiny microbes. Leeuwenhoek’s observations helped build the framework for bacteriology and protozoology. As several of the stories in this book confirm, science is a competitive yet oddly cooperative field, with research- ers frequently either refuting or capitalizing on one 11 7 The 100 Most Influential Scientists of All Time 7 another’s findings. Some ideas survive the test of time and remain intact while others are discarded or changed to fit more recent data. As an example of the former, Sir Isaac Newton developed three laws of motion that are still the basic tenets of mechanics to this day. Newton also proved instrumental to the advancement of science when he invented calculus, a branch of mathematics used by physi- cists and many others. Then there are the numerous advances made in the name of science that began with the development of vac- cines. Smallpox was a leading cause of death in 18th-century England.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biochemical Thermodynamics
    Biochemical Thermodynamics Biochemical Thermodynamics By Juan S. Jiménez Biochemical Thermodynamics By Juan S. Jiménez This book first published 2020 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2020 by Juan S. Jiménez All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-5359-0 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-5359-0 To the memory of Brígida and Francisco Jiménez CONTENTS PREFACE ..................................................................................................... x CHAPTER 1 .................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Atomic Theory of John Dalton and the Hypothesis of Amedeo Avogadro 1.2 The Mole and Avogadro’s Number 1.3 The ideal gas model 1.4 The Periodic Table and Initial Atomic Theories 1.5 The Hydrogen Atom and the Schrödinger Equation 1.6 Atomic Structure 1.7 Molecules CHAPTER 2 ................................................................................................ 35 ENTROPY 2.1 Systems, Properties and States 2.2 The First Law of Thermodynamics 2.3 Enthalpy 2.4 Reversible changes 2.5 The Second Law of Thermodynamics 2.6 A Particle in a One-dimensional Box 2.7 Quantum States 2.8 The Boltzmann Equation CHAPTER 3 ................................................................................................ 63 THE CHEMICAL EQUILIBRIUM 3.1 The Gibbs Function 3.2 The Chemical Potential 3.3 Chemical Equilibrium 3.4 Model Systems 3.5 The Equilibrium Constant for Chemical Reactions between Gases.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Mimesis As an Argument in Evolutionary Theory Around 1900
    Hist. Phil. Life Sci., 31 (2009), 201-214 “Imitation of Similar Beings”: Social Mimesis as an Argument in Evolutionary Theory around 1900 Stefan Willer Zentrum für Literatur- und Kulturforschung Schützenstraße 18 10117 Berlin, Germany ABSTRACT – The article analyzes imitation as both a fascinating and irritating phenomenon in “classical” evolutionary theory. Evolutionists situate imitation on the threshold between the natural and the socio-cultural, hence between the animal and the human. This intermediate position can be regarded as a symptom for the unresolved and maybe unresolvable problem of intentionality and teleology in nature. To elaborate this problem, I examine the ways in which imitation was conceived of by the German Africologist Wilhelm Bleek in his treatise On the Origin of Language and by Charles Darwin in The Descent of Man. Bleek and Darwin share a high esteem of imitation, which they see as the mainspring of human mental capacities, including language. But at the same time, imitation for them is the epitome of a low level of consciousness, embodied in the figures of the idiot, the savage, and the ape. Thus, the problem of similarity comes to the fore: similarity produced by imitation, but also being at the basis of every act of imitation. This problem is further evidenced with a side glance on Darwin’s remarks about mimicry in The Origin of Species. The article closes with a literary reading of Franz Kafka’s Report to an Academy, in which imitation and similarity represent survival strategies and motivate a strange shift from ape to man. KEYWORDS – Ape, imitation, intention, language, mimesis, mimicry, resemblance, similarity, survival Introduction To begin, the current relevance of the problem of imitation needs to be stressed.
    [Show full text]
  • James Chadwick: Ahead of His Time
    July 15, 2020 James Chadwick: ahead of his time Gerhard Ecker University of Vienna, Faculty of Physics Boltzmanngasse 5, A-1090 Wien, Austria Abstract James Chadwick is known for his discovery of the neutron. Many of his earlier findings and ideas in the context of weak and strong nuclear forces are much less known. This biographical sketch attempts to highlight the achievements of a scientist who paved the way for contemporary subatomic physics. arXiv:2007.06926v1 [physics.hist-ph] 14 Jul 2020 1 Early years James Chadwick was born on Oct. 20, 1891 in Bollington, Cheshire in the northwest of England, as the eldest son of John Joseph Chadwick and his wife Anne Mary. His father was a cotton spinner while his mother worked as a domestic servant. In 1895 the parents left Bollington to seek a better life in Manchester. James was left behind in the care of his grandparents, a parallel with his famous predecessor Isaac Newton who also grew up with his grandmother. It might be an interesting topic for sociologists of science to find out whether there is a correlation between children educated by their grandmothers and future scientific geniuses. James attended Bollington Cross School. He was very attached to his grandmother, much less to his parents. Nevertheless, he joined his parents in Manchester around 1902 but found it difficult to adjust to the new environment. The family felt they could not afford to send James to Manchester Grammar School although he had been offered a scholarship. Instead, he attended the less prestigious Central Grammar School where the teaching was actually very good, as Chadwick later emphasised.
    [Show full text]
  • Optical Timeline by Tony Oursler
    Optical Timeline by Tony Oursler 1 Iris is thought to be derived from the RED Symyaz leads the fallen angels. Archimedes (c. 287212 b.c.) is said to Greek word for speaker or messenger. According to Enoch, they came to earth have used a large magnifying lens or Seth, the Egyptian god most associated of their own free will at Mount Hermon, burning-glass, which focused the suns Fifth century b.c. Chinese philosopher with evil, is depicted in many guises: descending like stars. This description rays, to set fire to Roman ships off Mo Ti, in the first description of the gives rise to the name Lucifer, “giver of Syracuse. camera obscura, refers to the pinhole as a black pig, a tall, double-headed figure light.” “collection place” and “locked treasure with a snout, and a serpent. Sometimes And now there is no longer any “I have seen Satan fall like lightning room.” he is black, a positive color for the difficulty in understanding the images in from heaven.” (Luke 10:1820) Egyptians, symbolic of the deep tones of mirrors and in all smooth and bright Platos Cave depicts the dilemma of fertile river deposits; at other times he is surfaces. The fires from within and from the uneducated in a graphic tableau of red, a negative color reflected by the without communicate about the smooth light and shadow. The shackled masses parched sands that encroach upon the surface, and from one image which is are kept in shadow, unable to move crops. Jeffrey Burton Russell suggests variously refracted.
    [Show full text]
  • Mister Mary Somerville: Husband and Secretary
    Open Research Online The Open University’s repository of research publications and other research outputs Mister Mary Somerville: Husband and Secretary Journal Item How to cite: Stenhouse, Brigitte (2020). Mister Mary Somerville: Husband and Secretary. The Mathematical Intelligencer (Early Access). For guidance on citations see FAQs. c 2020 The Author https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Version: Version of Record Link(s) to article on publisher’s website: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1007/s00283-020-09998-6 Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online’s data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. oro.open.ac.uk Mister Mary Somerville: Husband and Secretary BRIGITTE STENHOUSE ary Somerville’s life as a mathematician and mathematician). Although no scientific learned society had a savant in nineteenth-century Great Britain was formal statute barring women during Somerville’s lifetime, MM heavily influenced by her gender; as a woman, there was nonetheless a great reluctance even toallow women her access to the ideas and resources developed and into the buildings, never mind to endow them with the rights circulated in universities and scientific societies was highly of members. Except for the visit of the prolific author Margaret restricted. However, her engagement with learned institu- Cavendish in 1667, the Royal Society of London did not invite tions was by no means nonexistent, and although she was women into their hallowed halls until 1876, with the com- 90 before being elected a full member of any society mencement of their second conversazione [15, 163], which (Societa` Geografica Italiana, 1870), Somerville (Figure 1) women were permitted to attend.1 As late as 1886, on the nevertheless benefited from the resources and social nomination of Isis Pogson as a fellow, the Council of the Royal networks cultivated by such institutions from as early as Astronomical Society chose to interpret their constitution as 1812.
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratory Manual Physics 166, 167, 168, 169
    Laboratory Manual Physics 166, 167, 168, 169 Lab manual, part 2 For PHY 167 and 169 students Department of Physics and Astronomy HERBERT LEHMAN COLLEGE Spring 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Writing a laboratory report ............................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction: Measurement and uncertainty ................................................................................................. 3 Introduction: Units and conversions ............................................................................................................ 11 Experiment 1: Density .................................................................................................................................... 12 Experiment 2: Acceleration of a Freely Falling Object .............................................................................. 17 Experiment 3: Static Equilibrium .................................................................................................................. 22 Experiment 4: Newton’s Second Law .......................................................................................................... 27 Experiment 5: Conservation Laws in Collisions ......................................................................................... 33 Experiment 6: The Ballistic Pendulum ......................................................................................................... 41 Experiment 7: Rotational Equilibrium ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GEORG OHM - Ω Physicist and Mathematician
    GEORG OHM - Ω Physicist and Mathematician The start Georg Simon Ohm was born on 16th of March 1789 in Erlangen in Germany and died on 6th of July 1854 in Munich, Germany. He was born into a Protestant family and was the son of Johann Wolfgang Ohm and Maria Elizabeth Beck. The family had seven children, but only three survived: Georg, his younger brother Martin and his sister Elizabeth Barbara. His mother died when Georg was only 10 years old. Education Georg and Martin were taught by their father who brought them to a high standard in mathematics, physics, chemistry and philosophy. Georg Simon attended Erlangen Gymnasium from age eleven to fifteen where he hardly received any scientific education. After the Gymnasium, he was sent to Switzerland as his father was concerned that his son was wasting his educational opportunity. In September 1806 Ohm accepted a position as a mathematics teacher in a school in Gottstadt. Ohm restarted his mathematical studies, left his teaching post in March 1809 and became a private tutor in Neuchâtel. For two years he carried out his duties as a tutor while he followed private studies of mathematics. Then in April 1811 he returned to the University of Erlangen. Teaching Ohm received his doctorate from the University of Erlangen on October 25, 1811. He immediately joined the faculty there as a lecturer in mathematics but left after three semesters because of unpromising prospects. He could not survive on his salary as a lecturer. He had a few more teaching jobs after that and unhappy with his job, Georg began writing an elementary textbook on geometry as a way to prove his abilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Alfred Russel Wallace and the Darwinian Species Concept
    Gayana 73(2): Suplemento, 2009 ISSN 0717-652X ALFRED RUSSEL WALLACE AND THE Darwinian SPECIES CONCEPT: HIS paper ON THE swallowtail BUTTERFLIES (PAPILIONIDAE) OF 1865 ALFRED RUSSEL WALLACE Y EL concepto darwiniano DE ESPECIE: SU TRABAJO DE 1865 SOBRE MARIPOSAS papilio (PAPILIONIDAE) Jam ES MA LLET 1 Galton Laboratory, Department of Biology, University College London, 4 Stephenson Way, London UK, NW1 2HE E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Soon after his return from the Malay Archipelago, Alfred Russel Wallace published one of his most significant papers. The paper used butterflies of the family Papilionidae as a model system for testing evolutionary hypotheses, and included a revision of the Papilionidae of the region, as well as the description of some 20 new species. Wallace argued that the Papilionidae were the most advanced butterflies, against some of his colleagues such as Bates and Trimen who had claimed that the Nymphalidae were more advanced because of their possession of vestigial forelegs. In a very important section, Wallace laid out what is perhaps the clearest Darwinist definition of the differences between species, geographic subspecies, and local ‘varieties.’ He also discussed the relationship of these taxonomic categories to what is now termed ‘reproductive isolation.’ While accepting reproductive isolation as a cause of species, he rejected it as a definition. Instead, species were recognized as forms that overlap spatially and lack intermediates. However, this morphological distinctness argument breaks down for discrete polymorphisms, and Wallace clearly emphasised the conspecificity of non-mimetic males and female Batesian mimetic morphs in Papilio polytes, and also in P.
    [Show full text]
  • Amedeo Avogadro
    Amedeo Avogadro ALSO LISTED IN Physicists FAMOUS AS Chemist and Physicist NATIONALITY Italian Famous Italian Men RELIGION Roman Catholic BORN ON 09 August 1776 AD Famous 9th August Birthdays ZODIAC SIGN Leo Leo Men BORN IN Turin, Italy DIED ON 09 July 1856 AD PLACE OF DEATH Turin, Italy FATHER Filippo Avogadro MOTHER Anna Maria Vercellone SPOUSE: Felicita Mazzé Lorenzo Romano Amedeo Carlo Avogadro de Quaregna e di Cerreto, more popularly known as Amedeo Avogadro was born on August 9, 1776, in Turin, Italy. He was a gifted physicist and chemist who proposed the molecular theory, which is more popularly known as ‘Avogadro’s Law’. Although he earned a doctorate in ecclesiastical law, he developed a passion for studying mathematics and physics. He then gave up his career in law and pursued a career teaching natural physics at the Royal College of Vercelli. Years later, he was offered the chair of mathematical physics at the University of Turin. Avogadro conducted experiments in both physics and chemistry using mathematics as a basis for his findings. His hypothesis, known as the ‘Avogadro’s Law’ is recognized all over the world. He also published many works during his lifetime. The number 6.02214199 x 10^23 is named as Avogadro’s number to honor him for his contribution in molecular theory. Read on to know more about this great physicist and chemist. Read more at http://www.thefamouspeople.com/profiles/amadeo-avogadro- 532.php#09s5lE6QjEOdfSro.99 Career After studying philosophy in 1789, Amedeo Avogadro graduated in jurisprudence in 1792 and earned his doctorate in ecclesiastical law in 1796.
    [Show full text]
  • Birdobserver17.4 Page183-188 an Honor Without Profit Richard K
    AN HONOR WITHOUT PROFIT by Richard K. Walton eponymy n The derivation of a name of a city, country, era, institution, or other place or thing from the name of a person. Gruson in his Words for Birds gives seven categories for the origins of common bird names: appearance (Black-capped Chickadee), eponymy (Henslow’s Sparrow), echoics (Whooping Crane), habitat (Marsh Wren), behavior (woodpecker), food (oystercatcher), and region (California Condor). The second category comprises people and places memorialized in bird names. Many of our most famous ornithologists as well as a fair number of obscure friends and relations have been so honored. A majority of these names were given during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, the pioneering era of North American ornithology. While some of these tributes are kept alive in our everyday birding language, others have slipped into oblivion. Recognition or obscurity may ultimately hinge on the names we use for birds. There is no more famous name in the birding culture than that of John James Audubon. His epic The Birds of America was responsible for putting American science, art, and even literature on the international map. This work was created, produced, promoted, and sold largely by Audubon himself. In the years since his death in 1851, the Audubon legend has been the inspiration for a multitude of ornithological pursuits and causes, both professional and amateur. Audubon painted some five hundred birds in Birds of America and described these in his five-volume Ornithological Biographies. Many of the names given by Audubon honored men and women of his era.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemistry in Italy During Late 18Th and 19Th Centuries
    CHEMISTRY IN ITALY DURING LATE 18TH AND 19TH CENTURIES Ignazio Renato Bellobono, CSci, CChem, FRSC LASA, Department of Physics, University of Milan. e-mail add ress : i.bell obon o@ti scali.it LASA, Dept.Dept. ofPhysics, Physics, University of Milan The birth of Electrochemistry Luigi Galvani, Alessandro Volta, and Luigi Valentino Brugnatelli From Chemistry to Radiochemistry The birth of Chemistry and Periodic Table Amedeo Avogadro and Stanislao Cannizzaro Contributions to Organic Chemistry LASA, Dept.Dept. ofPhysics, Physics, University of Milan 1737 At the Faculty of Medicine of the Bologna University, the first chair of Chemistry is establishedestablished,,andandassigned to Jacopo Bartolomeo BECCARI (1692-1766). He studied phosphorescence and the action of light on silver halides 1776 In some marshes of the Lago Maggiore, near AngeraAngera,, Alessandro VOLTA ((17451745--18271827),),hi gh school teacher of physics in Como, individuates a flammable gas, which he calls aria infiammabile. Methane is thus discovereddiscovered.. Two years laterlater,,heheis assignedassigned,,asas professor of experimental phihysicscs,,toto the UiUniversi ty of PiPavia LASA, DtDept. of PhPhys icscs,, University of Milan 1778 In aletter a letter to Horace Bénédict de Saussure, aaSwissSwiss naturalist, VOLTA introduces, beneath that of electrical capacitycapacity,, the fundamental concept of tensione elettrica (electrical tension), exactly the name that CITCE recommended for the difference of potential in an electrochemical cell. 17901790--17911791 VOLTA anticipatesanticipates,,bybyabout 10 yearsyears,,thethe GAYGAY--LUSSACLUSSAC linear de ppyendency of gas volume on tem pp,erature, at constant pressurepressure,,andandafew a fewyears later ((17951795)) anticipatesanticipates,,byby about 6years 6 years,,thethe soso--calledcalled John Dalton’s rules ((18011801))ononvapour pressure LASA, Dept.Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics Connections
    Charles Tracy L P S / y a a w s n e v a R n a v v e l t e D Physics connections Last year we celebrated the International Year of Physics — time and light. In particular, it described how space also known as Einstein Year. In the century since Einstein’s becomes distorted near a massive object such as a star, so that light follows a curved path rather than annus mirabilis (see CATALYST Vol. 16, No. 1) there has travelling in a straight line (Figure 1). been a revolution in the study of physics. This article explores Its publication in wartime and the fact that it was the links between some of the architects of this revolution. written in German meant that few people read it. However, one person who did read it was the British astronomer Arthur Eddington. The story goes that it was Eddington who brought Einstein to the world’s attention — though Einstein might have disagreed. instein did not become instantly famous in Eddington was a conscientious objector. As such, GCSE key words 1905; it took several years before he became a he should have spent the war in jail. Instead, he got Gravity Eglobal icon. In 1915, while Europe was caught official permission to prepare for a trip to observe a Alpha particle scattering up in the First World War, Einstein broadened his total eclipse of the Sun — a rare event. His intention Nuclear fission special theory of relativity. His general theory of was to verify Einstein’s general theory of relativity.
    [Show full text]