<<

1976HisSc..14..101O SCIENTIFic Hist. in which necessary without some GEORGES for cannot can development The it tation the recently. tion, volved provide analysis be suppositions examined. aspects achievement, decade, to which role biographical precise characteristic imposed may Interest Dorinda The University the undertaken. monopolize the urgent be which Sci.) purpose and aspects, history of were is also be extent properly in source of but some this of reader xiv Cuvier clearing examined upon this assessed. Clearly, Cuvier's constructing in cast need biographical existing Provided so Not established about awareness, tradition (1976), of of OutralU but of of : of expressions clues paper be of far the the Reading some of BIOGRAPHY science our This interp'reted. since factual this for only of also the traced almost we the 101-137 -sciences, his achievement, attention in for work the is a perception light is introduction through his biographical strictly because by Cuvier are the character, an critical true body arise a very the ground the inadequacy inquiry to death no is the is positive on WITH faced attempt attached full not location therefore Cuvier and nece.<;sary soon account of the of This NASA biographical has which we awareness before in as only implications has historians secondary of with have means are AND that afterwards, is revealed 1832 increased need bibliography biography A to tradition in himself. critical Cuvier. played because maintained. of to we has CRITICAL Astrophysics further outline emphasized, an been our a before by stress-points has provide to THE view been knowledge of unusual knowledge of in which increase studies, literature so been in bibliography. of considerably it the surrounding study of this their him. and the Incidentally, Its previous taken is CASE strongly the the is some distortions Cuvier necessary dominated standard thus situation persistence historiographical life-sciences which use and history but of adoption BIBLIOGRAPHY our Almost within Data of of on of Cuvier's interpretative OF of also informed the also the this work awareness Cuvier's are Georges biography; during have euvier to System of interpretations Criticism and intended extraordinary the every which it problems by bias work of only discover is science, on career until may continued emphases historical the highlight partly life the by can, and presen­ Cuvier Cuvier briefly of on it situa­ form tools very as pre­ and also and and can last has the the for in­ all its in a a 1976HisSc..14..101O measure success sell-presentation did of life-time, through d'une impact of This temporary medium subjected life-sciences; was have him biographers. The of that responses natural Sarah euvier. five about audience, detractors, definite These it incidents little tant place image tradition the time 102 pointless The This his the thought; so with only index he eulogistic examples than themselves concern about in it domestic Provided espece the of Lee, in scientist issues almost was of on did case history; this of selects his HISTORY in themselves issues in by ways from has which to one political science, of can to the took the the is the the the treated not public and, tradition, about the and nouvelle", searching the are examine euvier's caused important, account had identical success which readily surroundings,1 partly quite life-sciences. and and nineteenth euvier's be contemporary gone reader. way over mean., also we also by state scale just OF often biographies and aspect several gleaned the appearances, in. came the the know uses other his almost included reflected this biography SCIENCE determined may with for of terms as of a importanJCe both in available position however, scrutiny. and wording presented quality NASA large This life, work the for euvier surprisingly, particular of euvier's preoccupation stock to little century than further which be from of unremarked. of made depend his life,..sciences, all and His strong which sample of imagination. lengthy many related closed his considered of of the Astrophysics incidents its about issued career to the in of that euvier by his euvier early We the character to through science. it for his claims apparent unfortunate become the presentation most upon English polemical euvier's are parade self-dramatization come of the of systems these the discussion to in observation information still his the and relationship them, biographers, with the 2 put and, designed image hold 1833 other accounts from 3 the and incidents religious representative diffusion to know deficiencies the probably how came underlying naivety, of Her forward and euvier's of self-presentation personality image stand conversely, element but by a Data achievements, contemporary of carefully effects. euvier's use ideas, of it or peculiar account to his intended very of I to the of a related between gathered ideas; summary of for of they shall of be System complete because friend the both an the euvier's trigger own whose in life-sciences as euvier's the little in seen carefully the concerns image and the life We could the chosen most and discuss the external was and our we to admirers history concern for and image the as real biographical more life-sciences' by his for and to appropriate of "antiquaire image, know in movements know biography. influential. until knowledge life an of important important present character an life protegee, his in his portions argue his work concern the selected of himseU impor­ by world. of meant of makes about detail adult ideas 1964 were with little own con­ very and first and first the the his of in a 1976HisSc..14..101O in in bolster land, his euvier's of most note subsequent financial other extent into issues English she sciences which maries unjustified points. euvier condition of of selves and organization. occupied questions 1\1rs Pasquier powers, in 'Declinist' of is Lee Pierre the tactics In France, England. informed the the his euvier's its lifetime. relied 'autobiography' knew of a V Lee readers spite in Dugald writers, helped chosen harmony family she life-sciences.' alenciennes. Flourens. as reassuringly both reputable outstanding outlined criticism audience treated she respectability euvier's and and evidence as with and of especially heavily euvier tactics distilled of these Provided authors the views of 9 reproduced by organized she In English institutional by until Laurillard,7 her blocked for Stewart her the euvier's Mrs 6 fixity in between this of above. definite the of thereby and work, interpretations was 8 in of on humble on their She first the problems his from literal her the publicists towards Lee which sense, have prestige the It Disclaiming of translators papers sympathetic in the by character to 'Declinist' the had science also husband, force own is own and species, scientific long effectiveness the her Britain thus purposes, established Her interpretations the still call support as functioning Mrs disclaimers, between abandoned reader's was included commended the by mode of ideas, death his sources, well passed of extracts NASA provided used in approach attention in Lee's his giving the also the end reputation and long of may developments debate, the England. any as France, from figure of principles and which in repeatedly his interest 1818 social 'Dedilllist' of to a achievements used eulogistic private even passages. explorer before Astrophysics life in from 1856. sizeable model of confidence the the now his geological her of in governments. to of has a the and through and of the and in life,12 and other 10 are an though biographical had body Mosaic by the highly in euvier's the seem, 1832.11 information of the had of anti-materialist were To nervous easily 1823, in case, from T. tone A made extracts supported pursuing institutional Cuvier's to gained classification, GEORGES comparatively was what organism accounts popular eloge works of compile E. well-known whom in adduce which a these contemporary . in they did Mrs the comparatively and accessible Data possible lasting own The Bowdich, facts her were contact in system. In from by not part widow, had facts brief Lee alternative was was to had from of CUVIER accounts. England by own and strongly making such works her System euvier's about strike the setting convince his effect. by the was used and of implications to the were an memoirs with established its feature form flourishing biography, HumboMt expository were important organized figures life. be her including However works In intimate on the to a internal literary debate. him 5 euvier Cuvier during muted hostile of found them­ really many view­ Scot­ some pupil sum­ book such Few idea pre­ Mrs For 103 her th.e to of as of of 1976HisSc..14..101O attempts fact new biographical seemly to' already impair ingly experience life; PQlitical which work position, shDuld success Cuvier. lems tributed the respect withDut which nDbility Cuvier's aspects increasing kindness presence anecdQtes his by but strategy, and Mrs somehQw 104 linked the 'above' (pp. Mrs be the political same man a thrQugh provided hence note. 286-7). Lee fDrced distorted. delight Provided in has accepted to had in of his fQrm Lee radical pDlitics in Df been a career. scientific HISTORY much of to A thO'ugh to Mrs and time of closer France, the denatured a tinge abDut inevitably always such his to'o and scientific cDntemporary leading treat its students man Cuvier's The was moderation science, on form, in scattered attacked a social an Lee lecturing character. it She her (pp. tendencies origin to Df the the realm a in her In his cooperation by was by Cuvier's alsO' ConcentratiQn easy of nQvelty dominated and OF self-satisfactiDn. nDt the a careful was way frequent and sarcastic idea France 'Dec1inist' stressed scientist and 244-6, the science. arrogance work, the by failed him but (pp. demonstrated character, SCIENCE Qbliged way political for in only Dne-sided independent anecdQtes, style as the Df political NASA means the is also Cuvier's of political as emphasis 325, his of His and the to' to' and 21, stressed, to' the rebuke, distortions references the as consideration her cDntradictions a French (pp. with This political sidestep divert to make circles, are to' activities. simplicity 'Dedinists' resolve 41). man a 287, to to' of embodiment on Astrophysics moral rather role image account combat universalize distinct often career a 167-8), making be Qwn explicitly forced that Hence assertions gDvernments. seem from on not lesser such Conservative of 297) attention science of accompanied and the involvement, to these it qualities science of than science. Cuvier's the designed self-presentation, by merely in Qf the introduced of Mrs was criticism kind public Mrs is her failings are problem extent statements and strongly Cuvier, of man these means life, examined his Df in were different 'natural' about a Cuvier; emphasis that not Lee's from the Lee Data 14 of the his life. human its as detailed political underlying of in his and to terms English as individual thus only A'l On men of 'Dedinist' of to polemical of a 'Cuvier which science by genial 'Declinist' Cuvier's England, implied solution prQve the disinterestedness, intO' System hastiness about the separate pDlitical assert quality he outlooks, a Cuvier's connected and an foibles. on reassured, the were ideal Df final less activity which was analysis future readers interrelation was science social arrogance Cuvier's therefore that refuted/ the Qther his the the that to' character sympathetic correspond­ alsO' Cuvier qualities use position of not element case of alleged questiDns. the reahn character Common scientist', e stood he and scientific contrary was ideas essential Cuvier's had manner analysis worried science temper tended and should of merely of hand, 3 home prO'b­ about con­ had and her un," not the not his his of of in of to in in of at 1976HisSc..14..101O factual sequent between two he established conflicts and as other chair of Lee the thirty ville's which scientific dises cussion of Fonnerly the A worked and Mrs French to 'Declinist' I t the species general well produced the work reader his treats disinterest, men Alexander of to ... they He tected poured Lee was that in hand, years work. ideal would science, knowledge friend importance carrying as stem as out. interpretations the do euvier was the resisted work only of chose over as euvier's arguments result his euvier's to for away man not the of Provided Museum out Henri they income incidents a undermine then the Like Its open Lamarck, scientific in besprinkle growing the view euvier's in (p. but occupy to over and naturalist on of of the France from earliest torrent are contrast at about call 229). first Ducrotay Mrs science. disputes was deputy Mrs of them his of of Lamarck, liberty was that in antipathy whose central of barbarians; by assured the supremacy; a sensitive hostility euvier time the labours Lee, in her alleged 1832, Lee's that euvier; the and very which achieved the which out. the to his statesman . . . . mediator, and with presentation to handling de an Blainville book. the to work a possibly account after prominent NASA work ram dominated and financial between . . . . attempts hostile Blainville, of Her extended, and was their his recent collaborator, Geoffroy the but and at but his home a of this is On interpretation furnished wise the success controversial the long the from Astrophysics reflected "new vanity of most both as made interpretation countrymen with excesses in of euvier contrast euvier, support euvier's image position. counsellor to much cost the and by who her period deliberate and him the men. powerful dominate " his in no conflict 'Declinist' and of useful Blainville account the euvier's Lamarck GEORGES same of crystallized in himself, of using to whole 16 and addition shifting has of for life terms truly savant versatility French areas of close For of The against hostility Data (p. and of Geoffroy stock and and dominated expression the euvier. euvier and his force as became Blainville, scientific case. fairness euvier Mrs of 229). off of about CUVIERI05 the acceded debate with to public achievements. hostility. history: a prosecution sovereign System the the body distort euvier's areas whole, those the between always Lee attention occasionally o support to References the St stereotype preceding Blainville the was of his came is body restraint contrast all of rhapso­ HiIaire on of to means whom Blain­ mind, again fixity these facts fully tried sub­ own pro­ Mrs life, dis­ the the his of in of of IS 1976HisSc..14..101O seriously, to phical' biography Cuvier's des characterizing His tically projected both "appendix" Nor fonned Cuvier, the and and implication Blainville's to exemplify and quality important the ville's had him conducted Mrs 106 By take particular esprits very discussion own of did motivation. worked l' to passionne irrites l'ont . . . . . politique, didactic Lee as Provided Aristote account the attacked. their carry tradition. that up was of inherent he l' claims mSTORY attack reverse as portrays 0IlJt so had contemporary time qui attaque issues largely his neutral peut-etre attack wish behind social (p. it to Mrs taken out powerfully. hostility. device: grandi des it Cuvier's was en sont en (p. been of work dismiss il Blainville to 337). was is by to work at is Lee in In Blainville temps 371 the OF on in organization. leur Lamarck as possible justified ground In Cuvier join avec this the destroyed, true, the his no confonnity par au could tenus ).19 Cuvier the SCIENCE was conteIllt given this from doues" as Once immense strategy those a NASA dessus explicit genius, less Pallas modemes. preoccupations onto les truly un because epitome was forced ete as on for context, of be asserted dominance who the effective faits the is the achamement who the (p. the character. Cuvier's him de and important his writing, predicted. facile and not Astrophysics record and level, is talent with takes character underpinning son 372),20 to de 18 discussion controverted disinterested of contemporaries. that to methodology trivial Cuvier that Vicq do, "un la truly for vrai Blainville's register d'en over but are as other of the Cuvier's politique with he the he as lacking a ecueil merite; All d' the because brought was French Thus, the of trop popularizer became faire escapes that biographical Azyr would sell-image of pretensions character a the the life-sciences same Data issue man also of new character veritable of character violent such of revaluation ou seconde l'honneur in were charges the scientist, science it up join Lamarck. the merely used characteristics. position the of Lamarck, of contemporary System is pour in obvious eulogistic which necessity and Cuvier's personal. as credited neither science, could new detail. tradition pour as pour par not which in an did were d'autres an image the a by de of the life-sciences, son explanatory Cuvier be only Both not relish. vehicle n'etre instead la interesting those appearing Lamarck, kind subjected character school in of l'epoque, with Mrs Whereas systema­ 'philoso­ position plupart 1 builder In was '1 permit taking motifs tenus, Blain­ raised works who The had fact and Lee pas the for By of of so 1976HisSc..14..101O for foundation ship style Blainville's thing ville his put in such and extent again, could of the the the methodology the materialism terme he natural areas; of age. confusing day of Blainville the the thus religious not produce. "man definition tization This Blainville's discussion the terms considering allowed grasp unsystematic development external waters life-sciences. training scientist its him has really of here a which an If observed thus of scientist it difficult philosophique a combined relationship his image world, Cuvier never orthodoxy of (p. was enterprise deeper facts", into of is exploits and of science; I by influence basic a of overall Cuvier deologue that should typical world, Provided of the of and of 373). glorification Cuvier's the materialist, making a of also to been Cuvier because the yet was also the the Blainville many level of position eclecticism, conceptual objection attack overestimate,21 Cuvier the Blainville's body Cuvier's 'philosophical' in character to to the implied in life-sciences. were polemic exist was merely of moral implied attempted He the mental contemporary et his of have material his contradictory own as almost could life-sciences by perceptions on of obviously moral" so perception reproaches debate between character. of has an of theory even argues to a the ally perceptions silence other own possessed. a knowledge closely and problems and dominance Lamarck be of th.e brilliant intellectual philosophy attack characteristic Cuvier influenced all NASA in the of effective led though and is image-saving comparative of relationship for In questions (p. writers principJes,22 that any the likely which his in linked. being scientist. astray eyes of the statements his of on pursuing Cuvier has anatomist is 374). general. as of character observation, Cuvier's detail. good Astrophysics at what He which concern Deluge; his his Cuvier the which figure subsequent on to the statements seemingly had the conducted allowed by the about launched alleged of The two be religious Cuvier and man was for Characterizing The them between life-sciences continues the stressed same reticence his the Blainville about Debates did and amongst social unrewarding, for GEORGES as could at character of insincere the evil, observed. Blainville question wrong who personality, the (pp. 'good' the refusal removed questions and not popularizer the in time about through interpretations attacks relationship the views Data and not fact and the particular, same conducted "man this (pp. over 404, on necessarily observer hence the further kind few CUVIER (p. as be scientist of to political of importance and Cuvier's confDrn1ity perceptions these debate to System 387-8). the were on all 411). others time, Cuvier At those of separated. the the 383). the consider ideas and of and of make about of character, possibility him theory character the muddied facts" systema­ observer relation­ sensitive between medium and enquiry science, and so he to • on on of would which reflect power Blain­ of to same work Here as such both was 107 like But this the the the the the "le his on an of of in to is a 1976HisSc..14..101O sharply facts" viewpoints. exactly distillation written over the forced earlier obstruction Lamarckians. terest theory had "Cuvier conflict could impact the were as life-sciences with meant remained biography. character that began (Though ascribed evolving general Hailer, time, as 108 The After the a 'ideal' scientifique, evaluation La not earlier Provided aspects Cuvier's means in distinct an originator be that life by part of in to spans had between very between of premiere the projecting the history, disciplines been HISTORY the older undertaken Pelseneer of scientist.24 the its 26 of appear his of 1865 Darwin's of discussion preoccupations The obstacle of was also publication of preponderant this of individuals. shortly this own. from the able Lamarck main posthumously character The the tradition stressing by the of of ce the Cuvier underlying stressed approach. in.timately individual second conveniently fois Belgian OF in an back could fut to the the those century, second character speaks Flourens's medium Lamarckian to after theory of SCIENCE studies only 'evolutionary' que anticipate par NASA transformism/" could and the evolutionary different of period. the was convincingly the of of malacologist It l'evolution 27 role the Lamarck through with period the level methodology scientific linked throughout rendered action published Lamarck and that special importance was of His of also awarded of end Astrophysics supplied in continuing Origin Cuvier's the Cuvier, explanation. of Georges His and evolutionary injects approaches explanation. of not be of with theory of their the and (p. impact nature concerns Darwin. main biography, used fut be biography, the established urgent only Paul the work of such 53).28 denigration of conducted concern of additional and character. an their character though constituee Cuvier/ Darwinian species whose stress to interpretative First for the of Pelseneer of 'evolution', element of attention subject-matter explain Data onto a concerns of superstructure Darwin the French Given character reasons All was 1890,25 revaluation on W mechanics after through about 3 by discussion in Cuvier orId the in scientific n relation in three were en System of Cuvier ammunition the It Blainville, 1859, why of varieties.) terms (1863-1945) the 1859, life-sciences by are unease corps Cuvier. the with also of PCl-rt War, nationalism he product work of of Fontenelle and of French assumption explicit: all pure content new and of of "the shows of distinguishes these the of pursuit. a thus of de course of provides on that the schools to about distinctive Lamarck. and emphases character Lamarck this concerns polemics scientist, doctrine Cuvier's Cuvier's of man concern Cuvier, that carned to science. factors newly­ almost an of of of these rein­ into task and still the the the the the in­ In of of of of a 1976HisSc..14..101O but hand. with claims little Pelseneer through favourable insincerity idea to to really tance his mainly reached adopted an euvier, collection are claims Blainville's those The The some which attack attack rather dismissed de 70-71).31 clans scientifiques, dans generale personnage, qui . . . . que ... fit of about Blainville's of to already by 'Gennanic' to effects national toujours sa by extent depended extent Paris like the which c'est manquaient la Geoffroy theory on qui argued he undertaking le is, be le those of situation in this his rigueur biographical previous Provided opposite contemporary the doma.me however, premiere was monde in in 'facts'. the essentiellement menaient fully of confDnning issues key lack of characteristics tenns dHendre in 1795, dominance attack du this comme that founder exposed school the St the de fonned area et prestige of accusations and extra-scientifique kind in a Hilaire Df Lamarck, man no scientifique, by son detailed (pp. provided euvier's de life-sciences Dn a theoretical des on of the the la of tradition ses further more the la protestantisme of was of son to Gennan 69-70).29 euvier's of by his of lettre interpretation claims, la hommes de deux cDnquete life-sciences analysis paleDntology and NASA affairs, in religious Gennan his factual mental influence mentalite really scientific qualities by sa science. being examination Df de education emules Lamarck il really nDtoriere nationalist direction, (p. not schools exploitation euvier's la beneficiait Astrophysics necessary; exclusivement are development. des research; et scientific tradition more 88). orthodoxies, of course gennanique were politique un were of administratif, . . . . . interested still euvier's Pallas situations and of peu (pp. scientifique, in euvier The hostility of truly and considerations. being not , discussed GEORGES of Gennany prestige of the the biblique. et Ainsi, of etroit and and 67-68). section awarding et opposition by those 3D abusait comparative French his intellectual pDlemical also he Data et occupes felt. in due Vicq administrative we to NDr ... the euvier was des political in links ou countering were linked et of CUVIER a still by theory, concludes Belgium. If System The Mais d' indiscriminate puisqu'elle was son [italics influences, than d'autre il distinguished the great Azyr, the to de euvier know this stereotypes Taking already beneiiciait etait influences education up the kernel Lamarck il scientist, anatomy position. travaux time euvier, and impor­ semble • mine] but to nicely more part, such with very gros (pp. was 109 lui up he an to et of of of 1976HisSc..14..101O form separates authority of The ville's same Cuvier,32 is In Bourdier,34 implications scientific the thetic flattery of deep is that with was between approved accompanied assumptions explanations of to the explain Cuvier's biography, Pe1seneer From 110 presented carried Pelseneer's One scientific authoritarianism, make spite Cuvier old ages only de mure, Quand argument homme they of conceptual Lamarck time, . variety had Provided this stereotypes l'un, (pp. of the his of HISTORY 1804 his scientific ideas, to but the of and out norms appeals cannot have information, has whose elle the been, conducting respectability, the as be 'nationalist-evolutionary' part interpretation les 523-4). about of chez 19 possedant scientist article by based because in and subordination, ('·'He a that expected, fact influenced and surgit rather these connaissances natural foremost and sections assumed terms of confusion by in un on OF approach, reputation possibly his to of the Cuvier's 'objectivity' is that political Geoffroy. dreaded both the the autre 23, and the SCIENCE two fatalement, Cuvier's Cuvier of death interesting the than of his une behaviour and we of displayed the NASA the slow the he that is explicit both the on modem more different 'Germanic' attack (p. into be 'objective' in are here science in life-long opportunism, 'Gennaruc' body diffused philosophy acquired character the made was "the scientific sont assumptions 87).33 terms character it used acceptance 1832"). French As the in left convincing Astrophysics not presented is populace on automatiquement, fatally of level of a man the suffisamment victims a it logically suffisante account types together to rigid, of only reworking political Cuvier his scientific discussions through parting impossible the qualities sciences. of idea and deduce the of Pe1seneer's character, There of reappear analysis damaged because the and of Germanic, of facts" basic in about science throughout behaviour because of English to in where sound explanation without conservative ideal a a Lamarck's shot, the susceptibility follow ideas. a this the of terms Data blatantly of son of avancees far ideas for Most then of it in his Blainville's Dictionary with which scientific scientist, they philosophy Cuvier's causes by Bourdier simultaneously more represents views Cuvier dans confusion eclosion, greater this him mentality the System of introducing of character, But reappears that recent the his its appear. the scientists, account, circular theories; usual are le to in accompanies of qu'une of of love life"), in success to and he extent: issues. just cerveau keeping fulfil behaviour an character Cuvier. implies case his et so of biographers an the reality, allegations of is ("Between developed of unsympa­ Lamarck as a scientific (p. different fOTIIl. conflicts extreme and idee and, but grossest criteria Franck against science a power, Cuvier helped at de£aut to of Blain­ 525). d'un with very that the the use are the All est on it. to of as 1976HisSc..14..101O inadequate Explanations work, of natural as as he has pares back sketch species can of constitutionally The inherits ideas. Since ideas Mrs to tion closing could biographers. is limits the pointed between 'incorrect' conceptual approach. Darwinian tionary the biographical Cuvier, However, difficult But William dealing the undermine well scientific is more way decided be on Lee, anachronisms also onto in his the serve Coleman, that relationship of acceptance and chapters For out. and as concerns world, properly Cuvier's directly in the terms consideration recent and Cuvier faced to way theories. the with Coleman's Provided from which confusions of theory, to Coleman's 35 as Coleman example, to his the truth, see scientist drawn tradition Even the through older deal the explanations set for of and unable with how one rejection school need from of rather character the which so and Coleman assumption 'purely him reticence between of the the involved more and with the means the In of beloved both deductions the and 'scientific' for by the relies the lack fully the as of them recent to surrounding of firmly explanation question the terms than book, thus originates question this important problem the such those Cuvier support of biographers, his from image scientific' first images and of has most of heavily for explained he in by transformism. by examine NASA links PToblem, material of at explanation yet of book a awareness generation manifested defined background, such displayed the the drawn explanation Cuvier assumptions work the is the of to the puzzling of of plays ... of with 36 him unanswerable, are the of existing 'scientific' on Cve the "Cuvier and his debates, centre accounting immediately rest the an Astrophysics is Cuvier should Cuvier's hc underlie which simply he Cuvier's from the without the assumptions the 'purely the himself, such Blainville. subject again intended religion, approach existence of attempts on of in PToblems of basic by of 'scientific' main debate ideas the of relegated "Cuvier about terms and by the a many Cuvier's generated a in parts Bourdier. to scientific' ideas the large adherence an leaves study leads GEORGES for idea book, now conservative" terms the the points about problems in preceding as and should to and of the enormous on history On of presented important Cuvier's Data his of on a confirmatory be place seems area. account anachronistic character, such of him to Coleman biographers. that Cuvier's Cuvier's Coleman automatic about of re-examination reality Cuvier's logical change" by aspects abundantly of preface their evolution the In eUVIER not System to other into of of scientific a the posed Blainville, to The generation adherence keeping opening the widening biographical the for by man own science need issues (p. of have grounds life, character­ character, of no which the character is explicitly informa­ scientific (p. relations advance fixity Cuvier's Cuvier's species. his 6) theory, by role • means forced in terms, evolu­ to given clear. ideas same 174). been such with pre­ and life. 111 are the the by he be of to of as of of it 1976HisSc..14..101O has library detailed This Coleman and de of destroyed is tration mous relating his ever, and get it the which of dant. ville tion and also Ministry pursuit, biographers' presentation, a of deficiencies idea. with rounding by accurate the the 112 reflected, distinctive Lastly, Materials mainly However, Etienne his France, the writers political behind been spectrum College of has indicates question of could domestic collection most style, mass the career. the of of His Provided Museum, science. to and been picture of HISTORY printed depiction is under Cuvier Cuvier to the the education author intricate not; who the documents although Pasquier of as the in image official de rOle. working for fascination style thus be my as of partly his of part arrangements. official Museum, Institut our public France, has Interior, The it well had found the experience the of (see The how is awareness himself purposes and reflected of is by is OF However, knowledge and of activities of never ways obviously Cuvier's Commune, described also construction currently life, as there been (see biographical Section and on the correspondence. Cuvier's image SCIENCE task de the relating far the in his and publicity with and is an to in if no. religion, NASA prepared France the been so are to peculiarities contemporary of Archive in their biographers' allowed science evaluate of which the of annotated in the social, 10 in close his be 145) necessary of Fonds the in At style engaged, this also the to Cuvier religious fully and of education, Academy him, found great images the working Astrophysics of repairs was another tradition modern the and all the need are to further was paper of to an of personal, contemporary a the Cuvier author's exploited, these Cuvier, science. enter let Conseil bibliography). in enormous, full-scale to number often Material the autobiography, of edition. in before to preoccupations. are affairs, of public of these concerns ways alone a habits, are level, of the be the biographer smaller the spheres in Academy was smaller into almost him of disappointingly Sciences, own endorsed scientific that Archives d'Etat the we not losses biographical which man the image of make as and established the biography on Data Cuvier's Unfortunately, appearance, represent and well letters work can about memoirs, holdings Conseil one of merely overwhelmingly library extent his making of only by Mrs a in activity of and is System even as have is of science as is scientific and serious Nationales, (no. providing thus this the Cuvier's deposited Sciences. self-presentation at a reflected also to an which Lee the of negative. d'Etat, of his so at fraction tradition such of the pin-point left political social vague the 104). period autonomous not mannerisms overlapped. the Cuvier, faced the personality to and early, a assessment own Museum, an the activities adminis­ scientific William as live concern only Institut library a at defini­ in in Blain­ abun­ about How­ Paris, enor­ those That were of very with only self­ life, sur­ and out the the An the his on to it 1976HisSc..14..101O man version sensitive original, and account of on Flourens. to that remains nated use personality produced seems science of Cuvier's contain embarrassing of Cuvier's attempted gressive lying rules have posed of of discussing, of the to which problematic seem images with This Examination science be science the weld the science Georges his establishment of not the and of already out to explained? the problems the to they biography endless observable relationship first of which account of accounts take untouched, science fact, kind exploitation made always political character stylistic produce of an effect biographical and history solutions. has tills Provided Much Cuvier's as and as ostensibly half Cuvier, areas serious unparalleled on seen inability hypothesis do of the failed document that return an by of for on, of in attractive should a analyses of knowledge, material of within involvement of BlainviUe of in scientist. an how the The Mme in life objective, could extra-scientific corresponding with life biographers his century discussion provides Cuvier the the science many while to of the by image spring. to particular of to' form image explanations subject and cope this also Cuvier stereotypes history nineteenth the , and the now their flood also aCCDunt history of light on interpretations its activities. and mass within The until had of are have with problem, the NASA M. self-contained, and Cuvier's explanation of be extant This and problems own, very matter. of biography on working for of biographical science often Mrs tensions main evolved. of of Becker approached books very for terms. activity the indicated has science. his Cuvier's this split the of of but which century documentary science; fascination Astrophysics is Lee, the problems political the so and forceful, recently, Cuvier's method fashioned a use stereotype and But and such enough accounts within generated (no. of strong heavily career in Clearly, into on scientist is the of Hence of personality. Cuvier, articles. the many I t the value-free, in of tradition general unrelated the as through 123). the Cuvier's life a of is conflicts behaviour the presented obtrusive GEORGES biography terms has with polemical scientist remains the of as satisfactory the abbreviated for obvious material, development constructing have inconclusiveness was however, both peculiarities and by to established the Data probably emphasized impact as But the How image these surrounding fruitless of make such to omitted, biographer, of greatest led the which emotionless, the which to peculiar The CUVIER personality the to that it the System and tensions his as is most to problems refuge cast routes of remains it this phenomenon it of this whole. most a copy ideology relationship 'facts' attempts problem ideas the stereotypes an a by of lie impossible individual has about means naturalist especially the a of coherent a ideology paradox science. double­ the acutely picture behind notice- Cuvier history under­ of of as strong of which Pierre domi­ often from ideal pro­ thus true We 113 has the the life the the the of of to of 1976HisSc..14..101O fully the life-time. have in science, should fore ably conceptual found character let life, the validity nineteenth been scientist, as of German, Acknowledgements Research March, to tion. some non-scientific very 114 tradition whose Karl Humphrey, pre-circulated Society and ment Material the The fact the this a alone lead 'German' and Life Ludmi1la in a iniValid Figlio, prestige of endorsed factor a and it Curiously, specially realm now inability use Provided disapproved period, the 1976. concern the for to to difficult in HISTORY have and relate has fo~ the came Fellowship Sciences Germany criticism. century, basis. has ideas his be fascination of of its the in in this we prevented realizatiOon would activities of combined elements to Jordanova, the obvious. the the to emotive thought. facts scientific has autho~itarianism, of the the History to the to call of the the paper OF by be Wellcome Scott the A ideology act 1750-1850, the define never have of effect in images French of model and seen internationalization scientific. the further SCIENCE Conference Piers biographical and as the many concluding of force in the to any was Polar that of achievement, found NASA explanations a as These the of reduce been pursuit of his Cuvier's British guide of as Science Vitebsky of Unit analysis of sharing collected context, in implication New in of removing biographical Research achievement an the the science Germany a held extended spite Until the kinds Astrophysics attempts rigidity, for valuable on towards of section. expositor Hall, Academy. history peculiarities model character. most at large-scale tendencies Oof the New because under of during read recently, more and of itself; Churchill Cuvier's Institute, the Cambridge, of his History was of to of a and to to distortions place arrogance, Perspectives tradition The science the hence by new of the science. 'Germanic' closely. necessity take discover the the Cuvier; with that he I German stereotypes investigative external of of the As article first characteristics Data within debt of would perception tenure auspices full Cambridge, "should College, his German towards his so what Medicine, France history with for draft, more in Cuvier's Biography account to much commonly and to System character, is science the in also temperament, science political based of the German their harmful ascribe the the have of of about German Cambridge f science of gradually lack science a the of and science like stronger biographical Cambridge, question the contributed redefinition of of the 'Germanic' encourage­ personality was Oon History European came to been" has of Caroline German ascribed Cuvier's Cuvier's and criteria, internal science, a natural results, British in in there­ thank paper tradi­ valid thus lost has has the the his he of to of in a 1976HisSc..14..101O REFERENCES 6. 7. 2. 8. 4. 5. 3. 1. Mrs Eloge E.g., Apart E.g., There E. W. work. a Flourens Revue Besanron, 17 naturelle rupedes had religion, his fondateur of often last lated discours naturalists scientific school; since first on and Cuvier; extensive contacts as des universelle Institut; Mrs his helpful Napoleon, theory expedition; the the Conversely, 1881), Pasquier, Coleman, humanist Lee the D. K. septembre Cuvier first Cuvier", first illness; German from historique Sciences already theological encounters Lee. Scott; are Provided her into M. informative, C. i, preface politique has (Cambridge, his 249-50. his to meeting (10 couronne in his and contacts 2598(3) pursuits Peattie, des about Lyell, Memoirs some quotations 24 Eloge were de French (London, See Scott, declamation also Georges list (ed. history leaves Paris have marriage published daily vols, various the language Edinburgh poissons the on 1832); aout l'Universite", to de [David murmurs of Life hallowed with Michaud, twenty academy et also of by few Ministry de with 29 Cuvier's Green and with Paris, (this a in only timetable; Georges by par would of his of parlementaire, the 1833. Cuvier, Mass., list C. M. and the 1937), December passing; teaching common works and Baron (pp. studies from Theodore papers Wellington; the l' other prize; Brewster], is Paris library a L. to of Academie 1834-36), le laurels: readily of letters review, NASA modest clearly several have in the of Recherches Paris, 106; Laurillard, Reprinted Abbe the Baron 1964), Cuvier 184-205; these zoologist: unease the by Revue Cuvier the his were Tiibingen; offices in made e.g., (London, death of of in posts Duke 123). reached Gesner . 1834. Paris Lacordaire Interior. Regne available: Tessier, 1852), the incorrect); unceasing cxxxvi factual estate; .. the stock i, his was Astrophysics lii "Review the Cuvier H. des (Paris, through in his de 3-78. of (London a H. of in (1932), in of Institut political sur Puget, J. Eloge in serious the (Paris, a 'chevalier'; Sciences, his The Sir mother's and 1973). Paris R. incidents, the ix, a Wiirttemberg; study dies Paris, Poirier, errors 1792; (1836), his who (Chambre les 1834). smaller children, and The first Charles Rays, of 590-600, activity; 300-19. Tessier administration in refuses Buffon; his de 'autobiography' "Cuvier GEORGES in and ossements de journey 1834), (July-August reviews, Mrs in is that achievements serious career the and article about M. Arts, the France. natal and 265-97. "Georges care Birds, responsible the Read New Data a and audience Lyell Lee same le he especially to in is same both des tutor his membership his history et au from and euvier's Baron to only but refused in became also join book-length York, year it 1795, fossiles CUVIER and beasts to Belles-Lettres Pairs, System reading-circle (2 last year). Conseil ; year Mrs the may separately Cuvier, in the influence; these, vols, of 1932), based the than the mention shared other of of is for Cuvier whereas lecture; 1833; Clementine ; Biographie and education, a a seance as Lee des life: Academie be evolution the now Egyptian London, Eulogies Histoire member place his d'Etat", that Goethe though of on 85-115. second found works quad­ men: trans­ study great gives with wins that ... and first 115 MS. the his his his his du he de of at at 1976HisSc..14..101O 116 11. 10. 16. 14. 13. 12. 15. 9. See For An Histoire See In R. See science see for and a of et its Lamarck voyage Hard, men. kind to revolution. work Cuvier la also in 257-71. graphy Possibly Journal port. "Discours 'Declinist' debate critics before still and from 37187, 37185, Geoffroy assumption although Gedanken", the (ed.), 10 1830-1850", (1832), Provided 1932, W. ref. the problem their a interesting philosophie HISTORY Karl vols 1803, de the case 'Declinist' G. usual thoughtful may has contributed envisages of Burkhardt, 4. is Toward accounts 1933), 1830-32 Porto-Santo in His des Institut A. en 403: Andre and 1832, about and correspondence with in Figlio.) also difficulties (Lardner's whereas the of For contributed (p. Great St. originate presentation Cuvier sur Afrique Foote, debate, in life sciences England supplement, the lsis, has 118-23. See by 99). OF geology a alone most Biologische but Hilaire Geoffroy, its study 37182. Dugald the la opinions, a Mayer speech (3 (p. of is in study their Britain history history the S. obscured he own SCIENCE xlii tombe notes "The vols, Jr, sympathetically the organization was would 1796, (Paris, detailed William faced 129), in faites Peuteuil, de Cabinet in did could (London, NASA in "Lamarck, to still of Bowdich's right. (1951), conflicts delivered recognizing relationship und Stewart, Paris, of similar a l'organisation place to with in so see of and de whereas Edinburgh, of England, press a and by dans man go Lamarck 1826). Centralblatt, found Bowdich's in the geology their lasting be Cuvier Cuvier", and biology, Swainson, the W. also 1845), Cyclopedia, well Les Babbage, 192-208. Astrophysics of 1804. the attitudes with early statements made of l'automne of 1830) Collected at autodidact sensitive own science Lubosch, common he On evolution, it fetes uses described science. that science, beyond brief misinterpretation see Cuvier's as (Cambridge, iii, as im Arago necessary did The 1854), nineteenth iii Annales the is Excursions of et Cuvier's career Cuvier Taxidermy, L. 335-466. one du the British Charles Jahre towards (1970), in xxxviii the de so account 'Declinist' Cuvier's first study London, de works by E. centenaire ground iv, in the "Die historiography he funeral, the without in by of leurs and offers contemporary 1823 Page, des Geoffroy error 1830 387-8. repeatedly to Data helpless 1830, 1795; had Museum, another scope British century", 275-98, unceasing Babbage, of Mass. Cuvier Akademiestreit (ed. assure dans (1918), the of sciences progres reputation a in (p. pendant controversy these bibliography is 80, 135-7. 1840), "Diluvianism assured not 16 good and of System und the (I de of politics the Sir and zoological victim, 310), les May St. reform participant during owe though the his preached Cuvier to Add issues, this 357-84, that in differences most Wm The naturelles, of comme seine example Ues Hilaire, conflict. London, locus help audience work with financial son 1832. this C. Cuvier in paper. of nevertheless MSS. he de movement, in important, the decline J. Hamilton, correcting Lubosch's leitenden (Montbe­ reference troisieme and zwischen to Geoffroy England science", thought, classicus married general, 397-456. Schneer of Madere base and violent Cuvier in of in public 37951, prove 1969), poses This with both xxvi sup­ that bio­ On the the his its de of 1976HisSc..14..101O 20. 21. 22. 23. 18. 19. 17. 24. 25. 26. "a . . . . " It There For Blainville " For Cuvier Almost sciences with . ... savant, age, du range 38-69. and of indications tienne Aspects power, and for interpretation success in popular euvier's and about in and Demoulin, tology, biography euvier's people, American on A the and throughout tions these Hilaire tionary (1974), is fatal example, the forerunner interesting 1865. both 'academic' Museum a young idea the adolescents written angered by even a is their wider et all reef have lines of Provided evolution of the fury it de which et of 336-51. members both naturelles". of concerns, (ref. Aristotle no writers space sur Geoffroy studies own the accounts career has of for elle problems Flourens, Philosophical to propaganda Ducrotay euvier's people Cuvier by exalted are so the investigations basis full-length in National the science l'unite 15), by to scientist: establish been here most surveys emphasise to violent success examining, and nous of a articles given often in be of An of political seemed spectrum of iii, clear note of than and by St. euvier, of are was (Paris, easy the this found time. euvier intelligences life the him of modern montre in 351: interesting only de de the euvier, differs Hilaire: d'histoire as of in as this that the and can first his for J. the collected ideal, the for Academie the which study plan Blainville", to Society, the above his factors to a H. Piveteau, in "La 1881), NASA in for No stereotype (London, interpretation have social euvier achievements pleasing also be these to them be half self-image French popularizer; comment times." from the mastery contain. life. Gouhier, the see and example, et other vie achieved the find of validate biographies his naturelle, comparative so tied of points a in or British concerns to xlix L. and de des complexity works de Blainville's work result Astrophysics at do gifted." "Le The the particular the style. for represent true Enlightenment", M. scientist of Revue the compo$ition", of M. 1896), sciences, the personal il not of (1959); "La century; Examples memorial debat collections the other to in Marsak, an designed the Museum, extensive by only events etait de in but worth; has Albrecht higher ser. are remain this shared scientist. scientifiques. such philosophie Lamarck classification human onslaught philosophique, 98-131; study GEORGES attracted only him of entre of the reasons, 6, O. emphasis and apte present thought, role paper, of partly "Bernard ix prejudice." writers because the 'academic' volume Sonntag, for are continuity of as just literature his of would the concerns Data von could a euvier (1932), of Revue enquirer and the language Transactions est funeral tous use writing G. last the have through the such exclusive begun this on CUVIER in HaIler", though positive as une ornament Day, of help and System of in be Blainville de exploitation years Mme scientist les emphasize et these Lee, "The represents d'histoire contemporary attacked cxxxi interest levels, at the his for lycee made belle orations of over Fontenelle: Geoffroy to parties Naturalists in for to employed. the all Pasquier, to crumble. property Archives valuable concerns accounts children political /sis, et explore, Gustave motiva­ paleon­ classes, nature (1941), vie of evolu­ young which partly entire of along levels chre­ from died him 117 this des lxv the des the his for de St. of 1976HisSc..14..101O 34. 29. 28. 33. 27. 30. 32. 36. 35. 31. 118 "... Dictionary "When I Another As "The "Les See " 521-7. Lamarck." an Provided Ixxii Paris movement the his recent were physicist Hilaire et et extra-scientific scientific (see article on defend operated. due de Iv de sufficient problems (1965), entirely automatically, explain sciences, its I-Hi Rudwick, temps", that more present Vie ... hope 1818, (London-New well ref. l'anatomie HISTORY Cuvier", premiers extensive composition viewpoint, (1964), the Paul political idea first the (1919-21), et ref. to which no (1946-47), knowledge lacking in not as to recently, 4. work example is 80-81. other milieu, his the in d'apres Cuvier taken rigour L' reviews formulation consecrating will my 8); of ivni Fabbroni. Giovanni to iii-iv Pelseneer", provide work also and in The extreme-orient This works 223, which See, Germanic letter scientific by led rear temps situation Annales on and forthcoming and OF 1817; come hand, comparee in and implications marred York, 53-89. .... up world meaning irresistibly, (1950-51), of 134-40. the suppl. by et for Cuvier Gavin of to P. les book them; of SCIENCE is unconcerned men inaccurate Kielmayer he of with some his du de this reference in he his from sufficiently Huard example, Coleman's in naturalistes NASA 1972), detested. biblical of Bulletin de Cuvier's biography, and l'idee debat On of its mentality, Thus narrow became by exclusively was vol. dominance and de the shows an reworking dite evolution more of another." la administration, grasp 343-63. factual Pelseneer edition medical, administrative attack Beer, 101-63. scientific of : based if and xix in Societe evolutionniste: entre bibliography. was Cuvier only Astrophysics experimentale: tradition. the a these scientific "somewhat with a information de advanced book of the considerable (1965), allemands member ed. formed M. Journal not on inaccuracies: valuable to of on Cuvier is la occupied, the as of However, episodes i qualities In the royale himself, brain world, benefited C. E. K. showed the his Montagne, a (1949), Societe situations the a whole 1865, scientific evolutionary biography; Trouessart, C. 225-38. E. doctoral But scientific correspondence by and from influence." of et Germanic founder of von et Gillispie, of article (Paris, on he Lamarck, in see Geotfroy Flourens his . . . . the are as advance 179-259, l'oeuvre any context the it zoologique Data the ideas malacologique a by the benefited Baer's his Cuvier's Cuvier were P. seems and early lacking Institut doctrine which It "Georges man awareness thesis. history tendency sphere "Les his Brien, of e.g., history 1909), scientific are Cuvier should System mentality", debate. iii influence, within in published his St. which de Naturphilosophie, Geoffroy view education." that prominence whose visited L. organismes mature, led (New in the in early from Hilaire with of Georges de "Le of two was which Coleman's of G. one et Cuvier of this him 1795, also to his of complexity which prestige; France, also medicine, de E.g., paleontology lamarckisme Wilson, Geoffroy York, Cuvier; achieved rivals, the and learning England contacts St. attempt and individual, the . life was De Bourdier's they always Belgique, be is (Paris). not provides Cuvier", Hilaire, M. Tuscan abused et in marins Cuvier special l'unite almost is which really 1971), noted more lxxi­ with arise J. 1796 lsis, and also and son the St. xx by to of in in to S. is a 1976HisSc..14..101O ways of outside Victorian was nineteenth with bibliography supplied selections acquaintances. attempt of centrate as of certainly literary include is mous study of works relationship scale, field, part adolescents, examined arising consideration, death Principles vitalism; but also Cuvier different items included. My BIBLIOGRAPHY numerous problems Within being juvenile the no Cuvier's concern not also excluded until in the and articles, only of would in complete more out circles formed Section which every felt Cuvier. to on most information closely information, extensive such merit from tradition of 1832. these periodicals are of Cuvier's about accounts century. the Collections literature, evaluate of of scientific possible such selection, important in selection to Provided have should accessibly and under contemporary contemporary since works study which works Cuvier's it, most limits, compiling The related. 10 special through such Studies edition A 1828. celebrities it would involved literature which section dominated impact of several also the Cuvier's to important of here written on otherwise derivative there work, could have this figures only but of are introduce listed Cuvier Cuvier works. It consideration. Restoration, his in by seemed of The writings also also bibliography Cuvier's also this has was in also is to German on the the excellent since domestic well works the review Cuvier's as on about in reputation a the provide as be other however proved has decided produced bibliography contain later by not fine Humboldt, the be most listing A the nature helpful Cuvier's NASA further form found Stendhal hope most in special conventionally in different own self-explanatory-as been of bibliography Cuvier collection divisions contemporary in have histories circumstances. trivial correspondence, bibliographical the English the invaluable not works which been has the to of printed writers Lastly, of in to works in subdivisions comprehensively Astrophysics salon in life-sciences. obvious been problem include preserving only indicate aimed most Section and subject before at the devoted has articles the problems, established Cuvier's by of in and the in no see have excluded, letters of English Merimee, biology been of supplied or last the in at been starting only general, 1832; expense literary most 11. was attempt of with his French GEORGES on this the exhaustiveness. have to In British also into a aids century salon and to another by bibliographical compartmentalized. For ideas works few The notably Cuvier, turn, posed well identification contemporary periodical and an in to material evaluate Data included, in as been the not him. point already or which imagination, very of played published the the have asterisk otherwise has Museum's William Wellesley forming zoology this in as section for which CUVIER by which his been project. material excluded. same although System by for been different indicating few Regretfully, included topic works tends children also the an more exist press though those debates any Since taken specifically on have reasons Coleman's important published of part indirectly unknown problems after image made memoirs, index holdings imposed overlaps to on in in I studies serious anony­ typical or of works a fields there been have such con­ of The they into 119 and this few this the the the his his on to to of of it a 1976HisSc..14..101O Index 120 (2) (1) (5) (4) (7) (6) (3) (8) (10) (1) (9) (1I) 2. 4. 3. 1. 5. Aspects General euvier Genealogy, His His Printed Funeral His His General Bibliographical works Section to Provided de zoologie, introduction P. [ANON], K. 335-466. H. scientifiques leurs H. relations salon political interest Sections HISTORY ARDOUIN, la E. DUCROTAY DUCROTAY and Dependent Dependent moral science. Anthropologie author, Unfinished; the ville, See See (no. and the Kielmayer. (1972), and of letters. by biologie surveys VON Surveys orations progres (1». and euvier's no. Cuvier birth, printed or 33). University Introduction. 1841. vi medicine. scholarly in career. historien BAER, with exemplar by 191-200. on (1907), its though 4, Georges OF language and (Paris, of Supports of issues DE moderne DE and comme on the literary euvier marriage For on on Lamarck euvier's and SCIENCE edited scientific Cuviers "Biographie This text, sequel BLAINVILLE, BLAINVILLE, Cuvier, institutions. 263-347. Introduction. (1896). NASA Lee, it 1890). Lee the de Concerned of Cuvier, in in zoology: and is published see impact. base approach euvier (Paris, science. by distortions Dorpat. la (London, tempting Cuvier's and Originated and Laurillard, life. and Life. work. and social E. biologie", Ludwig Originated Astrophysics promoteur de death; de Histoire Vienot Geoffroy Cuvier Shuster-Aziza, 1970). commemorative a against with la euvier", sciences. after It was works; popular to 1854). Concerned introduced philosophie has centenary Stieda. Pariset in ascribe (no. proving et Revue 1832. des attacked St de in Geoffroy, proved lectures Geoffroy Annales Hilaire. archive l'idee sciences von 34). biography, it and Data First "Note d'histoire celebrations. with Cuvier's to by speeches Baer's impossible (3 at evolutionniste Some Duvernoy. delivered John emphasizes· the des catalogues; St printed de System vols, length ethical sur Hilaire; Abbe sciences ['organisation lectures with interest Macray Frenchness. des of Henri Paris, to by in 1835 between Maupied neutrality an sciences, euvier identify his biographies reviews naturell~s: Archiv et of Trouessart (no. in de 1845), historical (see createur debt 1869 Cuvier Blain­ 26). et as 1839 also into xxv the filr iii, of de of in to a 1976HisSc..14..101O . 15. *8. 14. 12. 13. 11. 10. 9. 7. 6. P. Kingsley baron G. ALPHoNsE A-P. tion G. G. siecles sur W. l'Institut I. L. (Limoges, FRANCK Gillispie, 1844), BOURDON DEMouLlN FLOURENS DAY, L. COLEMAN, CHAUVIN la for fessionalization entirety delivered An sive University See See See Originated larizer the from ful Intended article Cuvier's account Cuvier analysis dolle, life revolutions Laurillard, See Written theory DE J Cuvier 1-146. DUVERNOY, selection Provided suivie details to CANDOLLE Introduction, Introduction, Introduction. BOURDIER Introduction, letters expanded Naturalists bibliography (London, in de iii charges n.d. his dated DE of in J (Cambridge, appears J J of (New of by France Illustres Paris nationality; in (Paris, science. CANDOLLE Journal to for Georges Cuvier scientific Georges (ed.), d'autres [? of of uirs religious Cuvier's between his as dans Pasquier. du 1835, Vienot the between J J 1910]). Cuvier's young of Strasbourg, Notice York, . Memoires 1896), by "Cuvier", lectures J from character. version globe and throughout, 1833). Savants Academy political precedes (Paris, l'espece medecins ref. and des from ref. of Cuvier, the Cuvier: J etudes work. Mass., (Section Histoire 1971), people. Cuvier 98-131. J their Cuvier Cuvier's 23. historique 1795 1802 debats, political Section 23. as NASA Long delivered personal 1881). of et Dictionary franr;ais: humaine an 15-16 evlt, emphasizes servility, d'une 1.0010gist: sur Details of investigations: 521-7. 1964). and et Reprints souvenirs Egalitarian to histoire Flourens's with and and 10, introduction views; Sciences, 15 discussion des Reliance 3, naturalistes des career. works, Astrophysics 1800. November 1813. May nos ... sur knowledge no. the sciences Duvernoy to of especially sujets (Geneva-Basle-Lyons, sees eloges of de 53-56. his six les a the (Geneva, 1832. notice professionalization 156). and See 29 on scientific study Penetrating implications funeral ses daily f Cuvier's of ouvrages letters his GEORGES scientifiques Faculty December et des Linnaeus Flourens. also to 1832. highly travaux historiques Relies valuable later political biographique Dependent of des in his life. temps his 1862). nos from Cuvier. Data elogium the biography, savants Contains et method. of reprinted success edited on J 98 CUVIER and of history (Paris, Edward 1834, Discours modernes la J Sciences career Cuvier Defends material Duvernoy, System and en scientific vie prononces on of depuis 1873), See sympathetic versions of as which de particulier an science. de 1845). 135. of Confused ed. J as Pasquier in a to also Cuvier, Cuvier, Cuvier. sur in Cuvier on exten­ evolu­ (Paris, harm­ M. popu­ 1-285. . C. C. their deux Can­ pro­ Lee, was 121 the his his les of le a 1976HisSc..14..101O 122 *20. *23. 22. 21. 19. 17. 16. 18. Provided edi#on sophical Pallas} don, orient [Wo E. P. W. introduction T. H. (Paris, tion} 306-45, E- R. (Edinburgh, T. HISTORY and HUARD R. KNOX} JARDINE} DICK Pn}cedee much author appearance. Cuvier also ideas to shows friend examines a contain Cuvier Cuvier The First Reliance See viewed Reliant Reliance his 'Dec1inist' animal concerned Knox Reliance natural GRIFFITH]} 1973), serving HAMY} much HAYS, medical} 1853), E. Cuvier's Jussieu, "Notes (4 scientific Introduction, study refurbished second LAUDER} for published M. vols, and attention Great by greater of met of with 190-204. wholly by untainted theologians. productions, on The a OF 1834), more to Les iv, Birds} as Cuvier's on de on his HAAG} on Blainville, a the (London, intimes tone. with good M. E. i London, The Lee. comparative treatise Geoffroy a non-scientific 150-169. Cuvier evolutionary edition SCIENCE artists son Lee eminence, (1949), naturalist's relations debuts Flourens Lee, Forbes, disapproval foundation The MONTAGNE} detailed NASA 1-44. French, beasts to the in La animal bibliographical as eloge and Cuvier's See ref. without by sur his Pasquier, Archives Analyse and miscellany on France conflict 179-259. of 1834-37), 1852). in and de Argues and Introduction, St. Literary Pasquier. 32. and political religious with Georges and anatomy, historique and Astrophysics this and account kingdom great anatomy. Lamarck} 1821-22. library: Hila shared debates. for warning. "Georges activities, ideas of Reprints men: the protestante Lamarck raisonnee more work not between Duvernoy. de for Cuvier's i, Pariset, ire} the anatomists: papers Cuvier, of beauty opinions. life. pp. medecine of have to the section, Cuvier's many 1829. a mammalia arranged devoted (Paris, natural (Paris, natural Georges suivis Reliance his Cuvier's humanist Translated iii-xvi. ref. a Cuvier value and See human in Uses been (London, letter and des political ambition du 01£ of of Data 5. the Dismisses also 1884, though, de 1841). often political of his travaux navale, vies Docteur nature. to history history: a Lee's Duvernoy. misrepresented Cuvier} A according et light from geological demands (Edinburgh, recherches naive on history no. science biographical views hostile account, hostile son System iv, from de career. substitutes 85, 141-4. 1855), for of Pays 89. account Lee, Cuvier oddly, Protestants col. 1906. of de temps", career Blainville's observation, Quoy". etc. Unfavourably the . on power. the of than Georges to for little 989-1018) views, and zoology Concerned Cuvier. Both sur feline latest (Paris, neither its to Quoy 84, 17-58. 1834), a utility of and to by L'extr~me­ Flourens's tribute Bourgery, Adanson} attention organisa­ generally Cuvier's editions politics. franfais and and English linking French Cuvier attack. species and philo- was (Lon­ 1908), gives from Also pays re­ re­ an to to is a 1976HisSc..14..101O 25. 24. 26. 30. 27. 29. 28. 32. 31. sur S. C. 1833 266-8. par L. National [JOHN depuis naturalists J. Edinburgh, developed D. W. L. H. 157-61. LEE, RouLE, ROULE, L. PIZZE'ITA, C. les A. l'Academie The establish Cuvier Cuvier et See that his See gress ix, 1827. Reliance religious by SWAINSON, ciple cern Based ref. parative Introduction, Some poraries Cuvier Reliance Second (Paris, LAURILLARD, Provided l'Empire PEA'ITIE, leur ossements MACRAY], NICHOLSON, Memoirs Jean remoteness 590-600, Section Introduction, 10. Cuvier article to d'histoire of of reliance "La Cuvier on (London, in as origine to 1886), show not science. edition, 1834); Tulard, the anatomy apart insincerity. on Cuvier's Galerie the the on a James vie, Taxidermy, des (Geneva, Green worked in I, of really Lee. classifier, correlation is fossiles relevance "Baron et ref. author's 136-67. by Lee, life on Eloge from no. from la naturelle, the also baron jusqu'a SCIences, Natural also la 1937), 1933. Bibliographie carriere Wilson, the 21. the simple Flourens. passim, des See and laurels: science 1. Biographie interested to whom reprinted politics. des Bichat. based 1971), de Cuvier true Cuvier", and NASA article Introduction, Emphasizes justify 184-205. naturalistes: nos of bibliography Little labours of history: quadrupedes Arts, M. ix goodness et Cuvier author and de basis as jours on organs 46, he the (1932), la le (London, Usual No in biblical la by the et as discussion universelle, mort Astrophysics is ref. critique this baron knew Foreign nature lives of the of Belles-Lettres (Paris, mention inaccurate. the its to politics. of historian Cuvier's is of scientific 13-20. 4. leading charges work. ref. Encyclopaedia modern de Illustrations histoire rise liable and geology. and preface (10 Cuvier personally. heart. 1833). The Cuvier", (Paris, des 1893), 5. quarterly GEORGES of vols, and of biography achievements ed. The popularization to memoires of of See naturalists classification. description his biology. the ... des to Reprints 234-66. progress 1926). correction Michaud Paris, political de nature. Data Introduction, Archives debt 'man Cuvier's 1830 of Besanr;on, sciences discours Britannica. See review, CUVIER zoology, 1834-36), (London, sur System to dispute. of (London in ambition a Refutes Introduction, of (Paris, of his du by le letter Recherches facts'. of Britain The this naturelles x couronne the Consulat Museum 24 the contem­ science, 3 i, ref. (1832), 1852), 1840), Com­ aout, work prin­ June great from Con­ view 3-78. pro­ 123 and and See as 7. 1976HisSc..14..101O 124 (2) 34. 40; 41. 39. 35. 33. 42. 38. 36. 37. Genealogy~ Provided J. allemands National L. xliii 449-52. d'etudes E. R. [M. E. Georges 1932). Monts CH. d'Emulation M. H. S. HISTORY PEUTEUIL, VIENOT~ L. T. ANTHONY~ BULTINGAIRE, BOUQUET~ French. discussion gart, Duvaucel A by WILKS]~ Three also Wilks ruary Also See interesting Introduction, Disappointingly Reprints tion, the tine able the Anthony, tine, Contributions tenary BRIANCHON~ MATHIOT, (1932), TRouEssART~ weak HAMY Jura, Bourdier version Introduction, Cuvier only diverses, Cuvier his information d'histoire in ref. birth~ and at (Paris, 1828, knew studies, Georges by notices 344-5. book Memoir OF memoir de "Les Haute-Alsace, study, first 6. "Le (ed.), full-length (1831). letters "Comment of A. "Les Fiquainville. the details of Montbeliard, (Paris, marriage (London, and SCIENCE Cuvier's (Section Cuvier's "La xli-xliii 1909). form ref. fetes Lacroix. "L'iconographie hand, his centenaire dealing naturelle, from Cuvier of NASA concentrating origines Cuvier~ Luce lacking of his of on ref. between 'autobiography' 14. jeunesse of 1907). Cuvier du (Besan~on, Baron Clementine Mme The and L. 1, household, (1876). and account religious real 32, mourut 1832, de See respectively centenaire et revue no. Napoleon Astrophysics in familiales Concludes Roule, ix li Strongly and de Geoffroy Lancival, flower was Cuvier, names Cuvier also death. in detail, Lee 6). (1933), 1844), (1932), de Cuvier", regionale Section on the 1932). other Cuvier", a nos life de Cuvier", in J. and and and faded: Protestant de which Cuvier's (London who especially on French· with Portraits. hagiographical, de 99-162. du St. 1-12. 124, the within Vienot, with Cuvier", Epithalame Cuvier", than especially which birth 1, Cuvier's l'intelligence~ Revue grand Hilaire was Evangelical mensuelle Cuvier 44, no. remains Revue. Data a a Societe daily personal Lee Cuvier's n.d. instrumental short. date. 30-31, bibliography as 3. Weygand, this pastor Cuvier", sCientifique, Centenary Archives Memoires d'apres there in System his step-daughter [? in Also generale pour work press to memoir 34. Montbeliard, (March nationale 1850]). but either daughter us. magazine own life. in 1769~1832 is used Franche-Comte les is for le A. so with Paris. See du in de based. family. celebrations. scientifique, mariage of naturalistes of asa little Until English lxx 1932). Meyer, 1932. producing la Introduc­ Museum Clemen­ Clemen­ havraise all detailed of Societe Sophie source (1932), (Paris, Stutt­ avail­ Gives Feb­ 1964 cen­ See See de R. or 1976HisSc..14..101O (3) 52. 51. 49. 48. 50. 47. 46. 45. 44. 43. Aspects J. siecle J. V. (1931), A. de d'histoire G. onomy", l'Institut de A. G. 1969 naturelle, M. 185-217. R. National M. 1932). CHAINE, CARUS, CHAINE, V. Cuvier", la CANGUILHEM BUGLER, J. RoYA, BOULE, ANTHONY, for fication. function Cuvier ideas A globe A idem, Cuvier de than Contributions Cuvier's de tion (Munich, Cuvier's Maintains views interest Cuvier pour Societe of (Paris, CAROZZI, Provided more CAIN, translation 365-75. correlation discussion Cuvier Cuvier's Proceedings is to d'histoire because des d'histoire Histoire ix 11 on "L'acte (New "Georges "La le ou commonly Histoire Archives upheld "Georges the in detailed (63-92). Carozzi's 1880), attitude (1932), of d'Emulation "Deductive sciences, His popularization geological 1872). bicentenaire "Cuvier usual l'origine "Vne the dans the grande (ed.), man York, scientific debt of of by by de from de 483-97. chez role des 21-31. naturelle", animal the Cuvier's opposition his de English Cuvier, des towards See P. bapteme nouvelle l'histoire of the la Claims Cuvier, edition of xxiii "Georges realised. to sciences 1972). et de of C. Cuvier zoologie catastrophes O. epoque the religious l'anatomie sciences also fixity and facts, Virey. de NASA work. theory la Limoges, la economy Hagenmuller de (1970), Linnaean of Montbeliard, fondateur version teleology physiology. Cuvier no. negation" biologiste of chaire de inductive interpretation de la Archives Cuvier et the of de between Cuvier: paleontology. de depuis (Geneva), the 62. Cuvier", convictions. in naissance Astrophysics Darwin" 1-92. la l'Vniversite species founder l'anatomie comparee "L'economie science. and has as as Discours d'anatomie biologie, Society (see was de a l'antiquite moderne", (7-34); a Cuvier methods du been journees of their whole; lxvii Nouvelles German. la Section xxiv and (35·48); nearer the de Museum du of GEORGES paleontologie", See of published (Bordeaux, possible Reliance sur de F. comparative", I" Accurate (1969), and Georges original the soi-disant (1971), combatted confusions London, naturelle comparee Introduction, Dagonet, in d'etude Paris jusqu'au 3, Data (49·62); les Bulletin to F. science Linnaeus. litteraires, no. His post-Linnaean National 15-32. Courtes, revolutions consequences. 367-77. CUVIER on les as German 81). Cuvier", System account interest catastrophisme organisees clxx 1925), et M. dix-neuvieme "La the E. 30 of evolutionary du et of ibid., le Scientia, S. et his Memoires introduc­ Foucault, x (1957-58), ref. anatomy; d'histoire "Georges situation Museum principe Russell edition 265-91. 31 (7 in Revue of classi­ de 33-46. 21. May tax­ mai 125 the par his la 1 1976HisSc..14..101O 126 *55. *54. 61. 60. 59. 58. 57. 56. 53. Provided Annals laws H. J. de I. etudes animale notices (Paris, G-F. experimentale: 465-78. H. W. W. tary 'W. species", boldt and W. B. GEOFFROY HISTORY Normandie, DAuDIN, FALCONER, COLEMAN, Cuvier's of is Review mandy COLEMAN, truly (2 Also but saurs", Cuvier's 1856, Still . physiology. an of See Reprints Awareness fuse Reprints COLEMAN, volume Louis COLEMAN, DOLFUSS, of DELAIR avec vols, to 1841), Cuvier's d'histoire the sur and extremely 1790-1830 correlation realistically Archives Cuvier's Introduction, the printed "On 'scientific' be Agassiz", debate la Isis, on by London, des magazine Cuvier of xix classification misidentification OF 135-52. most found a a and olge generale, zoologie ST "A "Abraham "On the natural "Le "Georges the Huxley's viii of letter letter willingness "Les lxvi l'oeuvre notes (1965), SCIENCE naturelle, as accurate HILAIRE, debate note internationales on (2 direction W. post-Darwinian thoughtful sejour (1925), NASA et a Journal Professor and in in (1975), 1868). reconstructs vols, from from of whether organismes pamphlet de Lamarck: A. history on 225-38. ref. his the natural lecture with de predictive Cuvier, and Gottlob de S. Georges Paris, bibliography 156-78. the to Cuvier Essais Cuvier 5-25. 1788-1795", Paleontological Astrophysics of reconstruction See of Georges 36. SARjEANT, Georges absorb of its and Lamarck Huxley's as early the Cuvier's the l'anthropologie, (Caen, also to 1926). history, finds knowledge, relation les d'histoire biological the Cuvier's de marins Werner detailed distortions to to principle Cuvier", history the law. relationship Section classes flattery. Cuvier", Cuvier Agassiz Camper zoologie impact by "The 1926). Bulletin and work. of Royal attempted second to Mantell More of Cuvier's et vu des study of relations memoirs, zoologiques that that Sudhoffs 4, vanatIOn, Data of discipline en medicine, of earliest of of attacking l'anatomie Institution Basically par Vie extinct no. generale sciences, organic series, Normandie: information et 1829. de with of between Cuvier. the of and refutation 91. works l'histoire et System Alexandre Linnaeus. la this discoveries with ed. geography A Geoffroy. milieu, xvii and Buckland. Societe Adopts xviii and rch correlation hostile Humboldt. xv et ou topic. in Ch. of Georges comparee Tends iv, l'idee (1856), power". (1962), contemporary anatomy the de (1963), memoires on 15 ses of supplemen­ lvii von Murchison Linneenne usual to la February Contains Falconer premiers of fixity of Cuvier's de forms", Cuvier, to science 476-93. 315-31. Cuvier (1963), Hum­ was 51-63. dino­ Nor­ serie view Part con­ dite and et of a 1976HisSc..14..101O 69. 72. 64. 71. 70. 66. 63. 68. 67. 65. 62. National exercise J. de J-P. W. W. National Museum (London comparative du F. A. jusqu'a E-T. M. N. a things eH. of M. l'histoire KIDD, la man: Museum L. HOEFER, LACROIX, VON FoucAuLT~ A. A. with science anatomy. ambition. early views world. debt An miaire A euvier's The Reliance More First their tionary See of Importance Part GRAVIER~ tation LEHMAN, Provided HAMY Societe JOUBIN, (London, Locy, Locy, Bridgewater facts. nos extended of HOFSTEN, Section On and d'histoire of d'histoire d'histoire to report printed internal reading. use principally on concerned of his an jours by a theory~ (ed.), Aristotle. National anatomy", des Histoire the correspondence d'Emulation "Georges Biology technical by New "Les protest "La "Etudes The on euvier; Ideas Les XIV). intellectual his by 1970), 3, Lamarck. of by recherches in study (Paris, "Dicquemare Lee organization methode mots vers "From York, naturelle~ growth naturelle, opposition naturelle~ no. euvier - Swedish of treatise, molluscs the against with with and d'histoire de de sees 263-79. and language. euvier lsis, et of the 48. et 1873), 1925), euvier NASA les la de euvier euvier's faculties its les reference him of and exculpating xxiv unity scientifique Flourens. of zoologiques in Possibly iv the with arthropodes zoologie Montbeliard, containing ix ix makers for biology: choses to 315-67. et 334-59. juge Nordisk external of (1906), naturelle~ Lamarck as (1932), (1932), sur desertion (1935-36), Lamarck. Astrophysics to of la organisms Haiiy euvier's restoring classification. (London, les par Darwin, to nature minera1ogie", (Paris, (New most depuis 181. 69-75. 55-61. mollusques", euvier zoology de euvier the Tidskrift nature euvier extensive of dans of dans ix of lxvii 361-6. euvier", important York, supply classification; 25 1966); 1793; prepared the (1932), Unlike 1834), systematic as GEORGES a les le la September retarded from to page (1969), from (1805). the autonomy Regne (1922). 1908 temps Data Manche", indications the trans. discussion 299-347. Archives of 63-67. Bulletin Archives basis Linnaeus, from charges Aristotle the general his 7-14. physical and zoology. animal"~ eUVIER Note System les the as euvier of he way wants 1806 of the 1910), The du et plus Bulletin comparative du progress of of of pour anticipated the reinterpre­ for concerned to history condition memoires (3 Museum MU$eum Archives political the order and euvier's euvier's euvier's Cuvier 141-65. animal recuies vende­ evolu­ servir man 127 the du of of of 1976HisSc..14..101O 128 84. 81. 79 78. 75. 77. 73. 80. 85. 82. 76. 74. 83. .. L. L. L. J. J. xix critique paleontology E. Mass. W. L. toire century", E. R. M. W. Georges J. present temps (4 Provided THEODORlDES} LYON} HISTORY vols, S. C. ROULE} E. .. ROULE} THEODORlDES T. PILLON} J. WHEWELL} (1960), for Praises Very Based An tortions Counters Common Cuvier's cerns. of Issued Relies Distortions France. ment by Cuvier's Reports tion One E. RUSSELL} naturelle} PAGE} MIALL} and perdu", S. MERZ} Lamarckianism. Rudwick, SWINTON} example Edinburgh, times philosophique} account Cuvier is of "The inaccurate. in RUDWICK} of London, "Cuvier on on "Cuvier 209-14. for Cuvier tautologous "Diluvianism the by "La C. imposed OF Humboldt's Cuvier's recently History (London reaction A (3 Section ground Swainson's Coleman Isis} Form History search J. iv the the few imposed vols, "Humboldt over history SCIENCE (diaria by methode Coleman, and Schneer "Early (1932), as historien lxi 1969), Rationalist ichthyologiste", 1896-1914), secondary NASA The a and of by re-discovered a thought London, the 1, for in and to (1970), G. leading of vii for descriptive and biology no. evolutionary Emphasis of %oologica)", methodology 47-54 on conversation function criticism meaning and question 257-71. the history (ed.) the PETIT} (1878), en New biographical and European 30. has scientifique", et Astrophysics Cuvier 68-84. its search and accounts . , inductive biologie: i, 1837), biologist Cuvier", man: Press Towards (London, Chaine York, no critics 130 of "Les 129-38. on (London, of zoologist. to that of Stuttgart Archives predictive by sqq.; Biologie iii, comparative pre-occupations. for Association. the realize cinq Cuvier's thought with fossils: 1972), between to in cahiers (Section details. the English ibid.} sciences pre-occupied 448-51; a Cuvier, fixity human 1911), ibid.} attempt ii, Britain history personnages Lyell principle 1916), 101-63. its notebooks. du Data 256 50-71. value. episodes medicale) views in all of 77-82. de confusion 89-124. 472-80; 3, See Museum natural from sqq. on Blainville, fossils the species. in of a 31-44. anatomy", three Awareness nos notes System study Introduction, on geology Cuvier, the (William nineteenth of with the 80, a In 510-15. species. in men. lix See early theological organic la Nation(ll of and zoologiques 53, the earliest England the recherche the Comte", (1961), 8 no. (Cambridge, Endeavour, of 51). nineteenth ambiguity, July history Swainson, problems develop­ 134. Utilized the century correla­ ref. to d'his­ 1825. 1-20. con­ and dis­ the 26. La du de of 1976HisSc..14..101O (4) 87. 90. 86. 88. 93. 91. 92. 89. 95. 94. Cuvier's Journal Institut of aux R. T. ii E-T. P. P. R. F. paleontological Geoffroy logique J. The Cuvier, 343-63. de G. E. Geoffroy (1969), geology PIVETEAU, PERRIER, . COURRIER, LEGEE, H. FLOURENS, PELSENEER, W. plan BOURDlER, ref. see des Mainly An See On for Cuvier Lamarck Hilaire. by attitudes See See Originally of 1835), Early Cuvier Concerned professeurs Provided life HAMY relations HUXLEY, BURKHARDT, intelligence him Introduction, 1864. de de quadrupedes Introduction, Introduction, of 10. extremely et Introduction, the Jussieu, of St. St. 10-34. "Cuvier, (Cambridge, the 35.) Belgique, strains France: de and Richard concerned La dominated and (ed.), Hilaire Hilaire, natural "Le to "Georges from composition", De See "Geoffroy history appeared "Les "Owen's with philosophie evolution, du Geoffroy Flourens with by For by Lacepede, Etienne debat Introduction, l'unite in Museum hostile Geoffroy in Jr, Geoffroy notes the (Paris, the Owen Lamarck et l-lii premiers fossiles. Swainson, history and ref. and question of with the science; ref. "Lamarck, Cuvier the Mass. Cuvier", position manuscript entre as NASA are biology, and (1919-21), St. et 26. Section de 1825-1838", ref. Geoffroy account. (2 1865). relations 16. zoologique Cuvier's 'school a et discours, St. Revue Monge, is contrasted and Hilaire vols, and series composition, and to 27. temps (1769-1832), Cuvier a a needed Hilaire, of see ref. Reproduces in physiology. Annales sa Astrophysics synthesis iii 1, London, evolution, classification Geoffroy London, 53-89. of anatomical famille who d'histoire St. of of elogium also no. 26. (1970), For v between de Desgenettes, versus in et facts', avant in articles Hilaire, the (1963-72), on et 6. C. l'idee nos was de Geoffroy modern Bourdier's Flourens", certains of pp. 1969), (Paris, et 275~98. St. Recherches 1894), J. la Darwin of cancelled and and See GEORGES Cuvier: des 32, the 'right' du in Schneer, science", Hilaire. Cuvier 281-300. Societe evolutionniste: Lamarck. Lettres of also 641-61. 36-61. sciences, the the Data repressed biology. 153; 273-332. approaches 1901). debat Redoute, St. aspects quadrupeds (Paris, position Histoire Journal no. politics in Hilaire the Royale passages and and ecrites sur Toward in CUVIER System entre 101. 1830. de iii-iv Rev. campaign the les 1884), Introduction, Geof£roy Norry, sa of represented et on des et d'Egypte sur Cuvier ossements R. (1950-51), Lamarck, free carriere", attacking (London, a science", biologie, Cuvier's Malaco­ Cuvier, savants 112-42. history l'unite Owen, play etc., 129 for St. et a 1976HisSc..14..101O (5) 130 101. 102. 105. 104. 100. 103. 98. 97. 96. 99. Cuvier's iii et i P. CH. aux J. D. L. ibid., tisme G. dant de poor with H. to loi G. M. F. to the de Provided (1926), POIRlER, l'Empire", mSTORY GENEVRAY, MACLER, Bec-aux-Cauchois", France, (1949), HORNER, extend OUTRAM, LEGtt, LEGEE, SCHNEIDER~ la Guizot, GONTARD, working bourg; A of Geoffroy. Cuvier's Reliance tours and Cuvier Cuvier land little Reliance First Cuvier University political Cuviet. Detailed ecoles DE in la 747-60. preliminary franfais, Societe political letter their BEAUREPAlRE, Restauration", Great 241-79; first of published of 371-85. "Cuvier to "Le primaires and "L'Universite 1802-1814" his 1789-1833: appears held was and "Cuvier "Education material 1810. On by Holland. OF classes from attitudes, interventions Congres on Warden account on de understanding L'enseignement "Professeurs Britain "Goethe lxxxix help Museum career. in improve not ii Guizot; the the this SCIENCE I'Histoire Cuvier's Flourens observations (1926), Goethe et the and throughout. an to in state et de NASA without post la "Georges (1940), des f Cuvier's of Precis of (London, (University his Candolle des See French Italian Bulletin la assiduous autographs la reorganisation for and sous his education provisoire, King's societes 3-35, 'autobiography' of from Societe contacts monarchie to protestants and in du petits also the memoir de education the 22-39. la Astrophysics of new Cuvier, primaire the Protestantisme in 261-306. states Cuvier, November Duvernoy, l'Academie on no. poor, Revolution, 1838). de College, (see state Goethe's participant. ecoles Biblique savantes archival 1837. part of Universities at in amongst 92. the la 1814-1821", of Section Cambridge annexed bourgeoise 28 Harvard", Italy. by in dans Societe de in 1820 in secretaire en de necessity August Homer M. the London. (see l'enseignement Holland, 1793 (1970), work. position and the de Protestante France la l'enseignement l'Empire on Victor 1, the Italian franfais, Data Rouen, monarchie de Introduction, operation of to no. little Revue to the Harvard (Lyon, 1831; was working Ph.D. I'Histoire greffier of 197-214. Useful Montpellier France; February de 8). Cousin Cuvier's as on Universite departments System legislative more Lyell's et lxviii la d'histoire lxxxi regards in de thesis, 1959). the la maps d'ancien Revolution sous de library of fact classes Paris", superieur his Restauration", . than (1866), du 1795. ref. tour .. (1932), father-in-law the debate la le contributes schools 1974). of social and de Protestan­ translated commune meaSures, moderne, 6). Consulat Imperial a bulletin, annexed and Bulletin euvier's in regime, France. 305-22. recital Stras­ 253-7. with Hol­ pen­ t.i and the for la 1976HisSc..14..101O ·113. *108. (7) (6) 110. 112. Ill. 107. 115. 109. 114~ 106. Cuvier's Cuvier Belles S. vi lii-liii See journal, en J. H. de J. H. H. Societe London", d'histoire H. de D. G. D. (1934), SCHAMA, (1973), BASTIN, I'an POIRIER, Paris ROBERT, DEHERAIN, Montauban: CHARBOIS, PUGET, ROBERT, DEHERAIN, n'ALso, also Also printed cour. disinterest researched Cuvier's Information the No See Cuvier's Cuvier's Institut Letters Balzac's December An 1828. Cuvier Provided and salon Lettres", (1932), 339-54. XI", de Academy Introduction, xiii almost attempt Section (1932), considers scholarly 236-41. Journal de "Schools "Cuvier I'Histoire Reprints "A Les as Journal "Balzac, and by "Georges changing "Documents from should (1970), influence intervention literary 300-19. la ltGeorges Le ltLettres the in within further 1802 Vienot ibid. worthless eglises 85-115. 5, its by on lettres to philosophie of Jardin the of no. Cuvier's director institutions. Dumeril, au 589-610. and literary integrate Cuvier's des be his the to 11 (1932), Cuvier, du the interests. view ref. appointment the Cuvier, on 102. reformees (Section Conseil note December Cuvier, January a de contrasted savants letter politics Protestantisme NASA Society des concernant effusion; its in 2. Georges limits of Benjamin education of impact. 222-8. on Protestant foundation. tour et Plantes Fourcroy, Cuvier et science, to the second d'Etat", 10, membre (1916), in Geoffroy of the Reprints en 1803. d'histoire for the Astrophysics of 1830. non-Catholic Cuvier the nos with science its to France the Holland ongms and Consistory les Sigismund et in religion approach. fondateur Netherlands, the 368-76. 156 Revue affairs The franr;ais, de le Bibliography Geoffroy the Stuttgart. origines his St. his sur Perpetual is and generale salon 1800-1830 I'Academie of orientation acute impression Hilaire free GEORGES in under letter politique I'organisation and 165). the religions of Frossard", 1810. cviii de de de Data from St. concern Nimes politics, 1796-1814", Zoological de Cuvier I'D to the Secretaryship la (1831-1843)", (Paris, of (1962), Hilaire, des towards niversite", la CUVIER politics et Faculte the of System Natural Empire. in of Inscriptions Bulletin civilisation, parlementaire, Cuvier's of though 1961), France, (Paris, President March de 139-65. the Society Historical Candolle, and Geoffroy. l'Institut reformee History, 333-43. Revue of letters Revue 1951). de 1828. well­ from lofty ran­ 131 the of of et la ii 1976HisSc..14..101O 132 (8) *126. 117. 116. 121. 119. 120. ll8. 123. 122. 125. 124. Cuvier's . D. E. L. J. E.' de medicale mondes J. Languages 55-64, (Paris, sixth (Grenoble, et centenaire d'Emulation M. Z. Georges i, i, E. M-J. F. pour Provided 27-35. 241-50. HISTORY L. THEODORIDES, ROYER PILON PILON Cuvier Geoffroy CARTAILHAC, GUNNELL, THEODORIDES, BRuNoT, BECKER, An ing tion authors. Concentrates Interesting No Mickiewicz at Cuvier's Cuvier's the evidence, Cuvier's Defends Indications to three DURRY ZALESKI l'histoire Triennial interest 179-88. 1925). Bologna. J April new intelligent on J natural J J cii Cuvier, in J I Muses "Le letters (Paris, Stendhal de and 1930). (1961), the the (1932), St. by OF information. relations de interest "Le. (ed.), J "Discours literary Cuvier's Sutton 1819. Otherwise Cuvier and in "Mickiewicz salon primitive Literatures Museum, on took cultivation "Georges Montbeliard, world. Hilaire", the a SCIENCE of et Congress language from on "Quelques 1933), style "Les 21-50. Autographes sa showing 382-94. study Sophie bourgeoises au Cuvier's Stendhal, in Sharpe Geoffroy's NASA de style (Section famille with position him Jardin de philology 220-42. sur relations little Cuvier et in of Cuvier J in and as Duvaucel's Cuvier", of et of the Oxford, a naturelle to zoological Cuvier", et Sophie documents Literature et Astrophysics interests lxviii an praiseworthy new la 2, art du the Ampere, on Nathanial Abbe side. the ses de de au a no. grande indicator et and Roi: within de son fossil information. Mariemont International jadis amis social Jardin (1970), 1954 Duvaucel's l'anciennete 42), Bulletins Ranzani, de in the Cuvier contacts salon", drawing. and Merimee lettres inedits querelle and man ... franfais, 139-43. l'homme, (Oxford, sciences. S. Cuvier's problem Wallich 7-26. des refusal of contacts Peuteuil Sophie science: as Data Stendhal his et et Professor inedites (4 with Plantes", fiance ou justified and de scientifique vols Federation avec memoires de imaginative family of 1955), of to xviii peu l'homme", English Duvaucel System a Delacroix. in Calcutta, go Stendhal", in (ed.), and Proceedings des a universal club, of connus (1884), 2, 261-4. beyond Sophie India. Revue by and lettres natural his Paris, de Les painters the entre ix for its reaction et circle. April Materiaux la 3rd Duvaucel des relatifs (1966-67), alphabet. the available Interest­ fetes Biologie Reprints applica­ le 1955-59), Modern inedites history Societe Cuvier of series, salon deux facts. 1817 and the du to a 1976HisSc..14..101O *129. *134. (9) *135. 128. 127. 130. 132. 131. 133. 1 137. S6. Funeral xx G. giques E-T. liste' (Paris, N. G. R. sCiences, R. (1950), France, F. V. secreta Montbeliard A. A. A. Sciences SARTON, LARRONDE, SCHWAB, HERvE, ARDoUlN, ARAGo, (1910), SCHWAB, M. M. P. speech Cuvier's This the Cuvier's Reliance of An anatomy. As between between Cuvier Ardouin's collaborators. Read States Concentrates no. See An HAMY, aux Provided orations ire 1890). de 676-86. 1828 DE above. i C. History C. interesting 83). le belles-lettres Section extremely manuscript (1832), perpetuel Georges 296-7. terres to Cuvier to CANDOLLE, "Cuvier "A Funerailles DUMERIL, 23 DUMERIL, the La Les intervention elogium to "Cuvier, "Eloge (Paris, the Cuvier the on Reproduces "Cuvier the aout possession, on la rermaissance symbol Girard, of origines 317-32. Australes", Roule Society I, by on development Society entered recherche Cuvier Cuvier Medicine, anticipation et 1835, brief de 1835). no. de achievements is of and the et Allocution Funerailles Balzac, les et "Mort of de now I' Cuvier", President Darcet (Section arts du 8. Academie on la of on belles jour a French NASA and the and pour including Bopp M. geographie", letter Musee orientate 5 Autograph Revue 13 d'un Prints (Geneva), behalf London. army December et de commemorative de le of conventional June of of lettres", le Annales 1, (Section scientific prononcee le from manuscrit; baron l'inauguration of de Cuvier", 1802. Astrophysics in voyage Foucault's linguistic Royale d'ethnographie: no. after of a de sanscrit", the the 1832. paleontology. (Paris, M. letter Jomard's cx I' Cuvier 68159 30). Isis, Ecole 1828. La Cuvier: leaving Diaria Societe de (1832), Cuvier, du 3, supremacy. des Bibliotheque Discusses geographie, 1950), from la iv au science Reprints GEORGES no. speech les argument of 'Geographe' Sciences Mercure speeches to d' Societe (1922), plan the zoologica nom 442-8. A Stuttgart. de instructions de 62); the discours nthropologie Discours Cuvier 321-3. Data histoire la Well Geographie, and by for papers Society de letter 493. the statue Entomologique (Paris, of CUVIER of Ivii de one come such System of l'Academie universelle et of the (see 1835. close de et France, (Paris, (1932), from of du of comparative de anthropolo­ April of a 1832). similarities documents M. Library Section Cuvier de 1832. museum. Cuvier 'Natura­ parallels Cuvier's and Cuvier Arago, 301-8. Paris, 1832). cccix 1831. 133 des des his de of in 3, a 1976HisSc..14..101O 134 138. 140. 139. 141. 142. 145. 144. 143. 147. 146. CH. sciences Directeur de 466-75. E. E. i, aout Provided M. J. E. recueil R. E. (Paris, C-A. Villemain 1832). A-F. 351-430. E. HISTORY GEOFFROY DE PASQUIER, la PARISET, I. MICHAUD, DUPIN, Cuvier's First Academie who on 101-7; by First Speeches Cuvier's of life Paris, First Academie the Read his A and Contains Cuvier; Also the Cuvier's 1835, WALCKENAER, C. MURCHISON, deputation jOUY, VILLEMAIN, friend 1835). science. Duvernoy des Cuvier's naturelles, man ideas and NODIER, visual read was read was read de in 1850), first in du jour l'aine, by Histoire Funerailles eloges OF his he colleague Rapport friend, I' of Eloge ST. by no. the on of interest reviewed a Franr;aise. Academie present on Conseil des at to printed quality the letters. praises success de bibliography Discours the SCIENCE 392-411. Guizot childhood. envoyee HlLAIRE, classification. Cuvier's (no. the Chambre 16 Eloge Funerailles "Elogium 141. Inscriptions xxvi Funerailles Ius de I'inauguration NASA the Mayor des May Geological fait 14). in M. at in Royal on of dans as his de (1832), de by Nodier and (Paris, economist membres the a His a prononce 1832. funeral, its "Discours le a Aristotle. 31 Cuvier's M. Montbeliard Cuvier l'Academie mixture of des Ste. of popularizer Astrophysics baron Conseil Cuvier, les August These reading de speech based de de et Montbeliard le 403. Cuvier", 1832). This Pairs, was Very Society. Beuve, seances l'Instruction Belles-Lettres. M. baron M. de 16 de (Paris, Cuvier Dupin, au imagination sur informants of on was d'Etat; le Villemain 1832). eloge a l'Academie May Walckenaer brief. la le (Premiers nom Franr;aise 17 baron the la compatriot Cuvier: Philosophical of (Paris, that Causeries statue critically publiques baron 1832). Murchison September tombe (Paris, 1832. science. succeeded was and qualities de emphasis Data of Cuvier: publique l'Academie 1835). emphasizes de first were the par and Cuvier, Lundis Flourens. discours Royale de See 1832). reported was Cuvier de System and (2 Prefect M. read Cuvier", met of 1832. Introduction, the on to probably magazine, discours lundi, vols, Michaud, President (Paris, the Cuvier's de his 11 acquaintance discours on development de Cuvier Franr;aise a by popularization Medecine, of (Paris, Interested Pasquier scientist chair M. Paris, Montbeliard 5 Annales i Ste. the ... July 1832). also ii (3rd de political in au Beuve, of de at Doubs (1833), ref. (Paris, 1874), 1845), Jouy, le 1828. 1833, nom used and ed., was the des the M. ou 23 of in of 8. 1976HisSc..14..101O (10) 148. 150. 149. 152. 154. 151. 153. 155. 156. Other Etude des A. sous L. leur naturelle, G. M. an J. application Museum J. department, W. (London, J. (1969), N 1905). GEORG aturforschenden THEODORIDES, VIENOT, THEODORIDES, CHAMPOI MARcHANT VI FABBRONI, documents See A Letter First length w. MARTIN, A between printed exploration. of Letter Letter 1830. 1845). Leipzig. From vides science. The Humboldt A Section SWAINSON, la works correspondence (17 Provided letter letter 6 complete 58-60. Restauration very F. Introduction, SILBERMANN May, letter on October 1822). la more published G. a Also Lettres from the of LION-FIGEAC, containing of for Also collection from vacated politique from valuable 8, manuscript them Behn, Le behalf Scritti (trans.), About . 1821. inedits Cuvier Cuvier problem the is during evidence informative Testimonials no. "Une Cuvier "One de contains docteur by Cuvier dated 1798)", inedites Cuvier Freunde are appointment which (ed.), et biographie of di 128 See archeologique b)1 in enquiries ref. the (Grenoble, of note Georges collection et to printed to reproduced la lettre a Les publica of William to 15 the in letters also German of la to Revue Biologie for 30. Hartmann, monarchie Swainson, projected to a NASA Koreff mentions de inedite Cuvier's Fabbroni thermidor litterature, on the the deux Boisbertrand biographical zu resignation Champollion inedite Introduction, jJresented Georges another letters Cuvier, the by in nature Library of economia entomologique, et of 1887). Swainson Champollion: (1783-1831) with de medicale, Astrophysics Cuvier. by assistant natural peripheral de debt relative the letters journey de praising de by Cuvier of 18 Duvernoy Cuvier an lettres example 1788-1792 of bibliographie, state juillet (1800)", Georges Cuvier. an to of II of November to on note VIII Cuvier's jeune, (2 ref. history to -GEORGES Keeper ... March the Dr. I Kielmayer. the au interesting a behalf of in a it (1961), vols his figures un (Paris, (3 Humboldt, a by 10, scientific C. Georges i Karl-Marx Leach Dauphine leur North (Section H Cuvier of trustees friend, August 5 (Paris, and (1833), Zoological aventurier Pfaff, istoire and H. contacts in Data to in 1807, of December Cuvier's 1790. 51-71. vie in 1925). the I, 1778-1867, Ptaff be Koreff, accompanying nos in CUVIER . Cuvier's a Duvernoy introduction The and 1858). biography et 143-60. Florence, compatriot p. 1800), 1, System of 26 et undertaken natural February la 85, leurs et with University Other no. sur xxx, vendemiaire the discusses Gesellschaft illustration, biologie, only 29 intellectuel interest 1824. a 32. and 14). l'histoire See January oeuvres, salon. German l'Egypt. note d'apres British history letters major (Dole, 1847). (Kiel, 1822 pro­ 135 also and his by by in of at 8. ii 1976HisSc..14..101O 136 (11) 158. 157. 160. 159. 162. 161. 163. 164. 165. Bibliographical Provided Edinburgh R. Flourens, ciennes, [DAVID [DAVID instructor from TH. Journal C. 71), 219. vi C.F. C. des Bibliotheque H. H. 1908-22). HISTORY (1971), M. F. F. DEHERAIN, DEHERAIN, attitudes savants collaborator, Section cerned Cuvier Chalmers's Moses natural Cuvier The This logical into For Brewster explanation A 137-40. the Although Institut An Geoffroy 1922, CHALMERS, COWAN, a COWAN, COWAN, BAII.EY, response BREwsTER], BREwsTER], Creation, review Histoire Griffith of interim plates the North 18-29. review, in Deherain's to review, with by the and 9, (1904), refuges also theological OF (see towards 1814", domain Darwin met "On and nos de the "Notes issues, "The Catalogue "Cuvier's "Les the for Society quarrel to of Newton British himself "Remarks SCIENCE Cuvier report of confirms Section with naturelle has which numbering Cuvier l'lnstitut Whitehead 135, Ixii 190-5. Biot Guerin's that Review the NASA Works of Mosaic review manuscrits authorship natural work archive been (Baltimore, of on many (1836), Regne 145. for natural arguments review, on as on with theory as on 6, Regne revealed is des Griffith's in Mosaic considered a (Glasgow, on the des historians of still nos Cuvier, no. of geology Astrophysics lconographie: also his indications de popularizer history. London catalogues Cuvier of manuscrits 265-97. Eloge (no. animal. Cuvier's Bibliography poissons", Lee, i 112, which theological provides scientifique 164, of animal, election the France (1844), interesting 1959), religion; geology. on 170). names Animal see 156). historique as fonds Pasquier, also 1836-42), of is by geology. in See was Section far Theory 201-4. the of 1-41. his and first of F. a du (2 1818; to printing Copeia, proposed also Cuvier valuable Cuvier's particularly behind Haber, kingdom arguments Cuvier contributed science world de Generally introduction Data of parts as Permanant fonds contemporary edition", xii, nos 1, de LauriIlard in Natural See Georges of demonstrating no. iii Georges has 347-72. in this 14, letters The the System and in him in Cuvier in Section style guide of 16. time (1951), 112, been Cuvier fact on 'Dec1inist' review earth; 1, ibid., the age as Cuvier, History, to as Cuvier", Secretary of to of and and a to Paris-Hendaye, Cuvier 165. the conserves leaves ", does of changed the 1, reviews. working supporter 249-51. Cuvier 'philosophy' its v and nos the in he space; the timing Candolle, Christian (1968-71), 1834-35", contents. Laplace. v extracts Journal is world: tone. normal par 25, Valen­ of (1968- many ibid., since from con­ and a but 24; M. the of of la 1976HisSc..14..101O 169. 168. 170. I U I I. history T. C. l'Institut animal"} xv L. iv 1794-1865} Histoire P. Melanges (1962-68), J. D. (1925), MONOD) l'V. of See A See between euvier's P. Provided SHERBORN} the valuable ever u"UVu.l!..K} nos no. WHITEHEAD} naturelle Journal Franfais 600. ichthyologiques Histoire coauteur published", 162. 5, 168. 157, "Achille 300-1. euvier extensive bibliography "The of by .I. de des ~~11 naturelle and the de l'Afrique "The the Valenciennes Y poissons"} contributions i3 dates Isis} I'Histoire Society Valenciennes .l..L NASA dedies dating fI~ vi des flU' of of Noire} (1924-25),269-81. flU. for publication Annals poissons. Valenciennes; a Astrophysics naturelle of 'flU." et the to la lxviii the U, for l'Histoire various Bibliography memoire U.""" and first the (1965), • of des magazine authorship ...a..u... edition also euvier French naturelle poissons. d' 9-45. Data I..I.J.V''''' Achille assigns of of of and editions Natural t'V System of natural euvier's des t'u...a.u..a. Valenciennes, Memoires responsibility Valenciennes each poissons"} of History} volume history, ...... Regne u. Pliny. .. u...a.u..a. de