DOCSLIB.ORG

2016 Hazard Mitigation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2016 Hazard Mitigation Plan Grant Services & Consulting, Inc. Camden County Joint Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Camden County Emergency Management Agency Mark Crews, Director 2016‐2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter# - Page # Chapter One: Introduction ........................................................................................ 1‐1 Section I: Purpose and Authority ............................................................ 1‐2 Section II: Planning Methodology ............................................................ 1‐5 Section III: Plan Review ............................................................................. 1‐7 Section IV: Plan Organization .................................................................. 1‐10 Section V: Hazard, Risk and Vulnerability, Goals, Objectives ................. 1‐11 Section VI: Multi‐Jurisdictional Considerations ....................................... 1‐13 Section VII: Plan Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance .............. 1‐14 Section VIII: Community Data .................................................................... 1‐15 Chapter Two: Natural Hazard, Risk & Vulnerability (HRV) Summary ....................... 2‐1 Section I: Coastal Erosion ........................................................................ 2‐4 Section II: Drought .................................................................................... 2‐9 Section III: Flooding ................................................................................. 2‐12 Section IV: Hurricanes/Coastal Storms .................................................... 2‐21 Section V: Tornado/Windstorm/Hailstorms ........................................... 2‐29 Section VI: Water Contamination ............................................................ 2‐35 Section VII: Wildfire .................................................................................. 2‐36 Chapter Three: Technological Hazard, Risk & Vulnerability Summary ..................... 3‐1 Section I: Hazardous Material Spills ........................................................ 3‐2 Section II: Radiological Accidents ............................................................. 3‐4 Chapter Four: Natural Hazard Mitigation Goals & Objectives .................................. 4‐1 Section I: Coastal Erosion ........................................................................ 4‐5 Section II: Drought .................................................................................... 4‐9 Section III: Flooding ................................................................................. 4‐12 Section IV: Hurricanes/Coastal Storms .................................................... 4‐26 Section V: Tornado/Windstorms/Hailstorms ......................................... 4‐47 Section VI: Water Contamination ............................................................ 4‐58 Section VII: Wildfire .................................................................................. 4‐65 Chapter Five: Technological Hazard Mitigation Goals & Objectives ........................ 5‐1 Section I: Hazardous Material Spills ......................................................... 5‐1 Section II: Radiological Accidents .............................................................. 5‐8 Chapter Six: Executing the Plan ................................................................................ 6‐1 Section I: Action Plan Implementation ....................................................... 6‐1 Section II: Evaluation ................................................................................... 6‐3 Section III: Plan Update and Maintenance ................................................... 6‐3 Chapter Seven: Conclusion ....................................................................................... 7‐1 Section I: Summary .................................................................................... 7‐1 Section II: References .................................................................................. 7‐2 Appendix APPENDICES Appendix A – Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment and Vulnerability (HRV) Section I – Coastal Erosion a. Description b. Data c. Maps Section II – Drought a. Description b. Data c. Maps Section III – Flood a. Description b. Data c. Maps Section IV – Hurricanes/Coastal Storms a. Description b. Data c. Maps Section V – Tornado/Windstorms/Hailstorms a. Description b. Data c. Maps Section VI – Water Contamination a. Description b. Data c. Maps Section VII – Wildfire a. Description b. Data c. Maps c. Maps Section XII – Technological Hazards a. Description b. Data c. Maps Appendix B – Growth and Development Trends Local Comp Plan Executive Summary Statistics from Camden County Comprehensive Plan Community information Appendix C – Other Planning Documents County Strategic Plan Community Wildfire Protection Plan Hazuz Supplement to the Hazard Mitigation Plan Appendix D – Worksheets Used in Planning Process GEMA/Hazard Frequency Table FEMA Worksheet #1 Critical Facility Worksheets Report of Accomplishments Appendix E – Miscellaneous Required Planning Documentation Meeting Agendas Meeting Minutes Meeting Attendance Records Public Hearing Notices Appendix F – Glossary of Terms CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION TO HAZARD MITIGATION Table 1.1 provides a brief description of each section in this chapter and a summary of the changes that have been made to the 2005 Camden County Joint Hazard Mitigation Plan. Chapter 1 Section Updates to Section I. Purpose and need of the plan, Includes information regarding authority of authority & statement of problem federal and state regulations II. Local methodology, brief Section updated to include list of participants, description of plan update committee organization, and enhanced public process, Participants in update notification procedures. process III. Description of how each Section updated with narrative on plan section of the original plan was development process. reviewed and analyzed and whether it was revised IV. Organization of the plan Text revised, content unchanged from previous plan. V. Local Hazard, Risk, and Section added to address disaster events Vulnerability (HRV) summary, occurring since 2010 plan, and changes to list of local mitigation goals and hazards for study. Updated with local mitigation objectives goals and objectives identified based on analysis of cumulative and current data VI. Multi‐Jurisdictional special Updated to include multi jurisdictional considerations (HRV, goals, special considerations. needs) VII. Adoption, implementation, Minor edits have been made to this section. monitoring and evaluation (a general description of the processes) VIII. Community Data This section has been updated to include (demographics, census, population data and additional demographic commerce, history, etc.) information. Camden County Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2016 Chapter One 1 Section I: Purpose The purpose of the Camden County Multi‐Hazard Mitigation Plan is to create a safer community for Camden County residents by reducing or eliminating the long‐term risk to human life, property, and environmental degradation from hazards. This purpose will be accomplished by creating a planning document that becomes the foundation for emergency management planning, training, and preparedness, and by identifying those hazard mitigation projects that will reduce the impact of future hazard events. This document, referred to as the Camden County Joint Hazard Mitigation Plan, is the official update to the plan submitted to and approved by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Region IV in 2010. The contents of this document are intended to provide the framework for hazard mitigation strategies and actions undertaken by local governments within Camden County. The purpose of completing these proposed hazard mitigation actions is ultimately the reduction of the overall level of exposure and risk to the citizens of Camden County, Georgia. The Hazard Mitigation Plan Update will meet the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 Public Law 106‐390, October 30, 2000, as stipulated in the Interim Final Rule 44 CFR 201.4 Standard State Plan criteria, published on February 26, 2002. Meeting the regulations will allow Camden County to maintain eligibility and qualify to secure all federally declared disaster assistance, including certain types of Public Assistance and hazard mitigation grants available through the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Public Law 93‐288, as amended). Authority: Section 322 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as amended by the Disaster Mitigation Act (DMA) of 2000, is the latest legislation to underscore the importance of mitigation planning. Through this act, local governments will undertake a risk‐ based approach to reducing risks to natural hazards. The regulations governing the mitigation planning requirements for local mitigations plans are published under 44 CFR 201.6. Under 44 CFR 201.6, local governments must demonstrate that their proposed mitigation measures are based on a sound planning process that accounts for the risk to and the capabilities of the individual communities in order to qualify for FEMA approval. A FEMA‐approved Local Mitigation Plan is required in order to apply for and/or receive project grants under the following hazard mitigation assistance programs: Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) Pre‐Disaster Mitigation (PDM) Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) Severe Repetitive Loss (SRL)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hurricane and Tropical Storm
    State of New Jersey 2014 Hazard Mitigation Plan Section 5. Risk Assessment 5.8 Hurricane and Tropical Storm 2014 Plan Update Changes The 2014 Plan Update includes tropical storms, hurricanes and storm surge in this hazard profile. In the 2011 HMP, storm surge was included in the flood hazard. The hazard profile has been significantly enhanced to include a detailed hazard description, location, extent, previous occurrences, probability of future occurrence, severity, warning time and secondary impacts. New and updated data and figures from ONJSC are incorporated. New and updated figures from other federal and state agencies are incorporated. Potential change in climate and its impacts on the flood hazard are discussed. The vulnerability assessment now directly follows the hazard profile. An exposure analysis of the population, general building stock, State-owned and leased buildings, critical facilities and infrastructure was conducted using best available SLOSH and storm surge data. Environmental impacts is a new subsection. 5.8.1 Profile Hazard Description A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA] 2013a). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2.1.3, Has Both Unique and Common Features That Relate to TC Internal Structure, Motion, Forecast Difficulty, Frequency, Intensity, Energy, Intensity, Etc
    Chapter Two Charles J. Neumann USNR (Retired) U, S. National Hurricane Center Science Applications International Corporation 2. A Global Tropical Cyclone Climatology 2.1 Introduction and purpose Globally, seven tropical cyclone (TC) basins, four in the Northern Hemisphere (NH) and three in the Southern Hemisphere (SH) can be identified (see Table 1.1). Collectively, these basins annually observe approximately eighty to ninety TCs with maximum winds 63 km h-1 (34 kts). On the average, over half of these TCs (56%) reach or surpass the hurricane/ typhoon/ cyclone surface wind threshold of 118 km h-1 (64 kts). Basin TC activity shows wide variation, the most active being the western North Pacific, with about 30% of the global total, while the North Indian is the least active with about 6%. (These data are based on 1-minute wind averaging. For comparable figures based on 10-minute averaging, see Table 2.6.) Table 2.1. Recommended intensity terminology for WMO groups. Some Panel Countries use somewhat different terminology (WMO 2008b). Western N. Pacific terminology used by the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) is also shown. Over the years, many countries subject to these TC events have nurtured the development of government, military, religious and other private groups to study TC structure, to predict future motion/intensity and to mitigate TC effects. As would be expected, these mostly independent efforts have evolved into many different TC related global practices. These would include different observational and forecast procedures, TC terminology, documentation, wind measurement, formats, units of measurement, dissemination, wind/ pressure relationships, etc. Coupled with data uncertainties, these differences confound the task of preparing a global climatology.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Losses from Tropical Cyclones in the USA – an Assessment of the Impact of Climate Change and Socio-Economic Effects
    Economic losses from tropical cyclones in the USA – An assessment of the impact of climate change and socio-economic effects vorgelegt von Silvio Schmidt Von der Fakultät VII – Wirtschaft und Management der Technischen Universität Berlin zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Wirtschaftswissenschaft (Dr. rer. oec.) genehmigte Dissertation Promotionsausschuss: Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Christian von Hirschhausen Berichter: Prof. Dr. Claudia Kemfert Prof. Dr. Georg Meran Tag der wissenschaftlichen Aussprache: 19. Mai 2010 Berlin 2010 D83 Acknowledgements Many people deserve thanks and appreciation for this thesis, without their support and help, this work would not have been possible. Thanks to Laurens Bouwer, Oliver Büsse, Joel Gratz, Marlen Kube, Clau- dia Laube, Petra Löw, Peter Miesen, Brigitte Miksch, Roger Pielke Jr., Frank Oberholzner, Robert Sattler, Boris Siliverstovs, Michael Sonnenholzner and Angelika Wirtz for their useful comments and sugges- tions, engaging discussions and for providing me with the necessary data and with support for the data processing. Special thanks to Prof. Claudia Kemfert for her guidance during my studies, for her supporting feedback on various drafts of this paper and for her advice and motivation. Also, special thanks to Prof. Peter Höppe who was always available as a motivating discussion partner, for his advice and for arranging a funding for research activities. He also made it possible for me to have access to Munich Re’s NatCatSERVICE® database. I am also very grateful to Eberhard Faust who shared his profound knowledge on extreme weather events and the related insurance requirements with me. His support and advice contributed immensely to the completion of this thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane & Tropical Storm
    5.8 HURRICANE & TROPICAL STORM SECTION 5.8 HURRICANE AND TROPICAL STORM 5.8.1 HAZARD DESCRIPTION A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (NOAA, 2013). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development. The average wind speeds for tropical storms and hurricanes are listed below: . A tropical depression has a maximum sustained wind speeds of 38 miles per hour (mph) or less . A tropical storm has maximum sustained wind speeds of 39 to 73 mph . A hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 74 mph or higher. In the western North Pacific, hurricanes are called typhoons; similar storms in the Indian Ocean and South Pacific Ocean are called cyclones. A major hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 111 mph or higher (NOAA, 2013). Over a two-year period, the United States coastline is struck by an average of three hurricanes, one of which is classified as a major hurricane. Hurricanes, tropical storms, and tropical depressions may pose a threat to life and property. These storms bring heavy rain, storm surge and flooding (NOAA, 2013). The cooler waters off the coast of New Jersey can serve to diminish the energy of storms that have traveled up the eastern seaboard.
    [Show full text]
  • MASARYK UNIVERSITY BRNO Diploma Thesis
    MASARYK UNIVERSITY BRNO FACULTY OF EDUCATION Diploma thesis Brno 2018 Supervisor: Author: doc. Mgr. Martin Adam, Ph.D. Bc. Lukáš Opavský MASARYK UNIVERSITY BRNO FACULTY OF EDUCATION DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE Presentation Sentences in Wikipedia: FSP Analysis Diploma thesis Brno 2018 Supervisor: Author: doc. Mgr. Martin Adam, Ph.D. Bc. Lukáš Opavský Declaration I declare that I have worked on this thesis independently, using only the primary and secondary sources listed in the bibliography. I agree with the placing of this thesis in the library of the Faculty of Education at the Masaryk University and with the access for academic purposes. Brno, 30th March 2018 …………………………………………. Bc. Lukáš Opavský Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor, doc. Mgr. Martin Adam, Ph.D. for his kind help and constant guidance throughout my work. Bc. Lukáš Opavský OPAVSKÝ, Lukáš. Presentation Sentences in Wikipedia: FSP Analysis; Diploma Thesis. Brno: Masaryk University, Faculty of Education, English Language and Literature Department, 2018. XX p. Supervisor: doc. Mgr. Martin Adam, Ph.D. Annotation The purpose of this thesis is an analysis of a corpus comprising of opening sentences of articles collected from the online encyclopaedia Wikipedia. Four different quality categories from Wikipedia were chosen, from the total amount of eight, to ensure gathering of a representative sample, for each category there are fifty sentences, the total amount of the sentences altogether is, therefore, two hundred. The sentences will be analysed according to the Firabsian theory of functional sentence perspective in order to discriminate differences both between the quality categories and also within the categories.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Version of Global Guide to Tropical Cyclone Forecasting
    WMO-No. 1194 © World Meteorological Organization, 2017 The right of publication in print, electronic and any other form and in any language is reserved by WMO. Short extracts from WMO publications may be reproduced without authorization, provided that the complete source is clearly indicated. Editorial correspondence and requests to publish, reproduce or translate this publication in part or in whole should be addressed to: Chairperson, Publications Board World Meteorological Organization (WMO) 7 bis, avenue de la Paix P.O. Box 2300 CH-1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland ISBN 978-92-63-11194-4 NOTE The designations employed in WMO publications and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WMO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by WMO in preference to others of a similar nature which are not mentioned or advertised. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in WMO publications with named authors are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect those of WMO or its Members. This publication has not been subjected to WMO standard editorial procedures. The views expressed herein do not necessarily have the endorsement of the Organization. Preface Tropical cyclones are amongst the most damaging weather phenomena that directly affect hundreds of millions of people and cause huge economic loss every year. Mitigation and reduction of disasters induced by tropical cyclones and consequential phenomena such as storm surges, floods and high winds have been long-standing objectives and mandates of WMO Members prone to tropical cyclones and their National Meteorological and Hydrometeorological Services.
    [Show full text]
  • September Weather History for the 1St - 30Th
    SEPTEMBER WEATHER HISTORY FOR THE 1ST - 30TH AccuWeather Site Address- http://forums.accuweather.com/index.php?showtopic=7074 West Henrico Co. - Glen Allen VA. Site Address- (Ref. AccWeather Weather History) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AccuWeather.com Forums _ Your Weather Stories / Historical Storms _ Today in Weather History Posted by: BriSr Sep 1 2008, 11:37 AM September 1 MN History 1807 Earliest known comprehensive Minnesota weather record began near Pembina. The temperature at midday was 86 degrees and a "strong wind until sunset." 1894 The Great Hinckley Fire. Drought conditions started a massive fire that began near Mille Lacs and spread to the east. The firestorm destroyed Hinckley and Sandstone and burned a forest area the size of the Twin City Metropolitan Area. Smoke from the fires brought shipping on Lake Superior to a standstill. 1926 This was perhaps the most intense brief thunderstorm ever in downtown Minneapolis. 1.02 inches of rain fell in six minutes, starting at 2:59pm in the afternoon according to the Minneapolis Weather Bureau. The deluge, accompanied with winds of 42mph, caused visibility to be reduced to a few feet at times and stopped all streetcar and automobile traffic. At second and sixth street in downtown Minneapolis rushing water tore a manhole cover off and a geyser of water spouted 20 feet in the air. Hundreds of wooden paving blocks were uprooted and floated onto neighboring lawns much to the delight of barefooted children seen scampering among the blocks after the rain ended. U.S. History # 1897 - Hailstone drifts six feet deep were reported in Washington County, IA.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 TROPICAL CYCLONE RESEARCH FORUM 69Th INTERDEPARTMENTAL HURRICANE CONFERENCE
    2015 TROPICAL CYCLONE RESEARCH FORUM 69th INTERDEPARTMENTAL HURRICANE CONFERENCE SUMMARY REPORT With the support of the Interdepartmental Committee for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research (ICMSSR) and the sponsorship of NOAA/OAR, the Office of Navy Research (ONR), and the National Science Foundation (NSF), the 2015 Tropical Cyclone Research Forum (TCRF)/69th Interdepartmental Hurricane Conference (IHC) was hosted and chaired by Mr. David McCarren, Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Services and Supporting Research (Acting), from March 2-5, 2015, at the Wyndham Jacksonville Riverwalk, Jacksonville, FL. During the 2015 TCRF/69th IHC, the following observations were highlighted: In addition to the on-site participants, the forum had a substantial “virtual” attendance, with attendees participating via the internet, using “GoToMeeting” and dial-in audio technology. There were 143 total registrants—83 attended in person and 60 participated virtually. It was pointed out by several participants that the face-to-face interaction at the forum was very valuable; lots of good discussions went on during the breaks. The session presentations were delivered in a timely manner and, in most instances, adequate time was available for questions from both on-site and virtual participants. The Hagemeyer Award was presented to Edward Fukada via video-link to the JTWC. This document summarizes the results of the forum and includes the following sections: Section I – Overview o Purpose and Theme o Objectives o Abstracts and Presentations
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Weathertalk Newsletter for Friday, January 7Th, 2011
    Minnesota WeatherTalk Newsletter for Friday, January 7th, 2011 To: MPR Morning Edition Crew From: Mark Seeley, University of Minnesota Extension Dept of Soil, Water, and Climate Subject: Minnesota WeatherTalk Newsletter for Friday, January 7th, 2011 Headlines: -Cold continues -Overlooked feature of 2010 weather -Experimental Extreme Cold Warning -Weekly Weather Potpourri -MPR listener question -Almanac for January 7th -Past weather features -Feeding storms -Outlook Topic: Cold continues to start 2011 Following a colder than normal December, January is continuing the pattern as mean temperatures are averaging 5 to 9 degrees F colder than normal through the first week of the month. Minnesota has reported the coldest temperature in the 48 contiguous states four times so far this month, the coldest being -33 degrees F at Bigfork on the 3rd. In fact several places including Bemidji, International Falls, Bigfork, Babbit, and Cass Lake have recorded -30 degrees F or colder already this month. Temperatures are expected to continue colder than normal well into the third week of the month, with perhaps some moderation in temperature and a January thaw during the last ten days of the month. Topic: Overlooked feature of 2010 weather In my write-up and radio comments of last week about significant weather in 2010 several people mentioned that I overlooked the flash flood event in southern Minnesota over September 22-23, 2010 affecting at least 19 counties. One of the largest flash floods in history, this storm produced rainfall amounts greater than 10 inches in some places (11.06 inches near Winnebago) and near record flood crests on many Minnesota watersheds.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Tropical Cyclone Report Hurricane Dora (EP042011) 18
    Tropical Cyclone Report Hurricane Dora (EP042011) 18- 24 July 2011 Daniel P. Brown National Hurricane Center 3 November 2011 Dora was a category 4 hurricane (on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale) that moved parallel to the southern coast of Mexico. a. Synoptic History Dora formed from a westward-moving tropical wave that interacted with anomalously strong southwesterly low-level flow over the far eastern Pacific Ocean. The wave moved off the west coast of Africa on 7 July and reached the southwestern Caribbean Sea about one week later. As the wave traversed the southwestern Caribbean Sea and neared Central America, it reached the eastern extent of an area of enhanced southwesterly flow over the eastern Pacific and Central America that was possibly associated with an eastward-moving Kelvin wave. The interaction of the wave and the strong southwesterly winds resulted in the formation of a broad area of low pressure over the extreme southwestern Caribbean Sea on 15 July. The system moved slowly westward across Central America during the next day or so and entered the eastern Pacific basin early on 17 July. During the next 24 h, the low continued westward and gradually became better defined. Early on 18 July, the associated thunderstorm activity quickly became organized, resulting in the formation of a tropical depression at 0600 UTC about 200 n mi south-southwest of San Salvador, El Salvador. The depression became a tropical storm 6 h later. The “best track” chart of Dora’s path is given in Fig. 1, with the wind and pressure histories shown in Figs.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Hurricane Preparedness Guide
    St. Johns County Emergency Management HURRICANE PREPAREDNESS GUIDE OFFICIAL GUIDE FOR ST. JOHNS COUNTY HURRICANE PREPAREDNESS GUIDE contents Contents 2 History of Hurricanes in St. Johns County 3 Weather - Thunderstorms, Tornadoes, Tornado EF-Scale . 4 - Tropical Storms, Storm Surge, Tides, Waves, Freshwater . 5 - Hurricanes, Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale . 6 Preparedness - Disaster Planning . 7 - Business Planning . 8 - Being Prepared, Know Your Zone, Disaster Kit, Document Checklist . 9 - Flood Insurance . 10 - Being Informed, NOAA Weather Radio, Alert. St Johns, Local Radio and Television Stations . 11 - A Message from the City of St. Augustine and the St. Augustine Beach Police Department . 12 - Sheltering Options . 13 - Transportation . 14 - St. Johns County Evacuation Assistance Registration Form . 15-16 Before the Storm - Preparing your Home, Manufactured Home, Mobile Home and Boat . 17 - St. Johns County Sandbag Operations . 18 Evacuation and Sheltering - Mandatory Evacuation, Curfew, Vehicle Traffic, Travel . 19 - Designated Evacuation Routes for St. Johns County . 20 - FDOT Emergency Shoulder Use, What If I Don’t Evacuate . 21 - Sheltering During a Disaster, General Shelter Supply Kit . 22 - General Shelters and Locations . 23 - Pet Friendly Shelters, Pet Friendly Shelter Supply Kit, Pets Allowed at Shelters . 24 - Special Medical Needs Shelters, Special Medical Needs Shelter Supply Kit . 25 Recovery - ReEntry, After the Storm, Mosquitoes after a Hurricane . 26 - St. Johns County Debris Operations . 27 - Communicating During an Emergency, Beaches Energy Services . 28 - Florida Power & Light / FPL . 29 - Jacksonville Electric Authority / JEA . 30 St. Johns County Hurricane Evacuation Zones Map 31 2 | St. Johns County Emergency Management Hurricane Preparedness Guide | 3 St. Johns County Hurricane Impacts St. Johns County residents have experienced many storms throughout history.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature's Axisymmetric Hurricane
    16A.4 WHAT ARE ANNULAR HURRICANES? John A. Knaff * , James P. Kossin Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University,Fort Collins, Colorado and Mark DeMaria NOAA/NESDIS, Fort Collins, Colorado 1. INTRODUCTION. projection is Mercator with a uniform spatial resolution. The resulting spatial scale is 1280 km The appearance of tropical cyclones in IR X 960 km for each panel. imagery differs greatly from case to case and over time. This study discusses a category of During 1995-1999 six hurricanes (2 Atlantic tropical cyclone, termed "Annular Hurricanes". and 4 Eastern Pacific) were subjectively When annular hurricanes are compared with the determined to be “annular hurricanes” (Table 1). greater population of tropical cyclones, as It was found that these storms have several observed in an infrared (IR) data archive of features in addition to axisymmetry that separate tropical cyclones, they appear distinctly them from other storms, including systematic symmetric about their center. Their appearance formation characteristics, steady intensities, and in IR imagery is characterized by large circular their existence in only in specific environmental eyes surrounded by a nearly uniform ring of deep conditions. convection and a distinct lack of deep convective features (i.e. spiral bands) outside this ring, Table 1: A list of annular hurricanes, the basin in Figure 1. which they occurred, the times that they exhibited annular hurricane characteristics and the number of hours they exhibited annular hurricane characteristics.
    [Show full text]