DOCSLIB.ORG

Hurricanes Frances & Jeanne Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hurricanes Frances & Jeanne Report HURRICANE FRANCES & HURRICANE JEANNE Post-storm Beach Conditions and Coastal Impact Report with Recommendations for Recovery and Modifications of Beach Management Strategies Florida Department of Environmental Protection Division of Water Resource Management Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems October 2004 Foreword The Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection is responsible for protection and management of the State's sandy beaches fronting the Gulf of Mexico, the Atlantic Ocean and the Straits of Florida and the regulation of coastal development adjacent to those coastal beaches. The monitoring and assessment of hurricane impacts to the State's beaches and coastal construction and the preparation of post-storm recovery responses and management strategies are important elements of the Bureau's responsibilities. This report provides documentation of the impacts of Hurricanes Frances and Jeanne on the coast of Florida and preliminary recommendations for post-storm response activities. This report was prepared by the Coastal Engineering Section for the Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems. The report was written by Ralph R. Clark, P.E., P.L.S., with major contributions and preparation of graphics by James LaGrone, Coastal Engineer, and additional contributions by Robert Brantly, P.E. Field data of beach and dune erosion and structural damage were obtained by Ralph Clark, James LaGrone, Robert Brantly, Mark Taynton, Bobbie Nelson, Gene Varano, Bill Wilkinson, Phil Sanders, Jackie Thompson, Celora Jackson, Steve West, and Jennifer Cowart. Hurricane track assistance was provided by Ernest Besse. Aerial videography and oblique aerial photography were supplied by Stacey B. Roberts of PBS&J. STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ~~ Michael R. Barnett, P.E., Chief Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems 1 Table of Contents Foreword............................................................................................................................. i Hurricane Frances ............................................................................................................ 1 Hurricane Jeanne.............................................................................................................. 4 Post-storm Beach Conditions and Coastal Impact Summary and Overview ............. 7 Nassau County................................................................................................................. 18 Beach and Dune Erosion ..........................................................................................................18 Storm Damage .......................................................................................................................... 18 Duval County................................................................................................................... 20 Beach and Dune Erosion ..........................................................................................................20 Storm Damage .......................................................................................................................... 20 St. Johns County ............................................................................................................. 22 Beach and Dune Erosion ..........................................................................................................22 Storm Damage .......................................................................................................................... 23 Flagler County................................................................................................................. 26 Beach and Dune Erosion ..........................................................................................................26 Storm Damage .......................................................................................................................... 26 Volusia County................................................................................................................ 28 Ponce de Leon Inlet .................................................................................................................. 28 North Peninsula Beach and Dune Erosion ............................................................................... 28 South Peninsula Beach and Dune Erosion ............................................................................... 28 Seawalls and Other Coastal Protection Structures .................................................................. 30 North Peninsula Damage..........................................................................................................31 South Peninsula Damage..........................................................................................................32 Summary of Damage................................................................................................................. 33 Brevard County............................................................................................................... 35 Canaveral Inlet ......................................................................................................................... 35 Sebastian Inlet........................................................................................................................... 35 Northern Brevard County Beach and Dune Erosion ................................................................ 35 Central Brevard County Beach and Dune Erosion................................................................... 36 South Brevard County Beach and Dune Erosion...................................................................... 37 North Brevard County Damage ................................................................................................ 38 Canaveral Inlet Damage........................................................................................................... 39 City of Cape Canaveral Damage.............................................................................................. 39 City of Cocoa Beach Damage................................................................................................... 39 Patrick Air Force Base Damage............................................................................................... 40 Central Brevard County Seawall and Revetment Damage ....................................................... 40 City of Satellite Beach Damage ................................................................................................ 41 City of Indian Harbour Beach Damage.................................................................................... 43 ii City of Melbourne and Unincorporated Brevard County Damage........................................... 43 Indialantic and Melbourne Beach Damage .............................................................................. 43 South Brevard County Damage ................................................................................................ 44 Sebastian Inlet Damage ............................................................................................................ 48 Indian River Lagoon Damage................................................................................................... 48 Summary of Brevard County Damage on the Coast ................................................................. 48 Indian River County....................................................................................................... 50 Beach and Dune Erosion ..........................................................................................................50 Ambersand Beach Damage....................................................................................................... 53 Damage between Ambersand and Wabasso (R20-R35)............................................................ 53 Summerplace Damage ..............................................................................................................53 Wabasso Beach Damage........................................................................................................... 54 Wabasso to Indian River Shores Damage (R40-R52)............................................................... 54 Indian River Shores Damage .................................................................................................... 54 Damage between Indian River Shores and Vero Beach (R65-R74).......................................... 55 Vero Beach Damage ................................................................................................................. 55 Summary of Indian River County Damage on the Coast .......................................................... 61 Saint Lucie County ......................................................................................................... 63 Beach and Dune Erosion and Storm Surge on North County Beaches .................................... 63 Beach and Dune Erosion and Storm Surge on Hutchinson Island ........................................... 64 Northern St. Lucie County Damage.......................................................................................... 65 Ft. Pierce Beach Damage .........................................................................................................67 Damage between Ft. Pierce Beach and Normandy Access (R47-R98)..................................... 67 South St. Lucie
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Atlantic Hurricane Season Outlook for June 2020
    Atlantic Hurricane Season Outlook for June 2020 ELEVATED U.S. RISKS FROM HURRICANE SEASON 2020 AS VERY BUSY YEAR BEGINS… Outlook Overview ➢ WeatherTiger’s WeatherTiger's June outlook for the 2020 hurricane season is for a 75-80% chance of an above average year, with a 15-20% chance of near-normal and just a 5% chance of below-normal cumulative activity. The median of our forecast is about 180% of average hurricane season activity, or around 19 named storms, nine hurricanes and five major hurricanes. ➢ This is slightly above the consensus of some other recently issued forecasts, likely due to our model's bullishness towards a La Niña developing by late summer or early fall. However, almost all forecast groups project above normal activity. ➢ Overall, while model skill remains limited at this range, convergent lines of evidence from our objective modeling and seasonal analogs support an active season, with the potential for a risky steering current regime in the peak months. Updated Seasonal Outlook for Tropical Cyclone Activity On a lighter note: hurricane season. The devil you know is back. Unlike a pandemic, at least taking down the shutters after a storm won’t make it return. This doesn’t imply that hurricane season 2020 will be reasonable. WeatherTiger’s updated seasonal forecast and a consensus of other guidance favors an abnormally active year. We expect net activity of about three-quarters more than the average season, with 95% odds of more storms than Dr. Birx has scarves. I’ll get into the forecast rationale and what it may mean for Florida, but first, a quick orientation for new readers: I’m Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Cyclone Report for Hurricane Ivan
    Tropical Cyclone Report Hurricane Ivan 2-24 September 2004 Stacy R. Stewart National Hurricane Center 16 December 2004 Updated 27 May 2005 to revise damage estimate Updated 11 August 2011 to revise damage estimate Ivan was a classical, long-lived Cape Verde hurricane that reached Category 5 strength three times on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale (SSHS). It was also the strongest hurricane on record that far south east of the Lesser Antilles. Ivan caused considerable damage and loss of life as it passed through the Caribbean Sea. a. Synoptic History Ivan developed from a large tropical wave that moved off the west coast of Africa on 31 August. Although the wave was accompanied by a surface pressure system and an impressive upper-level outflow pattern, associated convection was limited and not well organized. However, by early on 1 September, convective banding began to develop around the low-level center and Dvorak satellite classifications were initiated later that day. Favorable upper-level outflow and low shear environment was conducive for the formation of vigorous deep convection to develop and persist near the center, and it is estimated that a tropical depression formed around 1800 UTC 2 September. Figure 1 depicts the “best track” of the tropical cyclone’s path. The wind and pressure histories are shown in Figs. 2a and 3a, respectively. Table 1 is a listing of the best track positions and intensities. Despite a relatively low latitude (9.7o N), development continued and it is estimated that the cyclone became Tropical Storm Ivan just 12 h later at 0600 UTC 3 September.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rapid Forecasting and Mapping System of Storm Surge and Coastal Flooding
    AUGUST 2020 Y A N G E T A L . 1663 A Rapid Forecasting and Mapping System of Storm Surge and Coastal Flooding KUN YANG,VLADIMIR A. PARAMYGIN, AND Y. PETER SHENG Department of Civil and Coastal Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida (Manuscript received 16 July 2019, in final form 2 March 2020) ABSTRACT A prototype of an efficient and accurate rapid forecasting and mapping system (RFMS) of storm surge is presented. Given a storm advisory from the National Hurricane Center, the RFMS can generate a coastal inundation map on a high-resolution grid in 1 min (reference system Intel Core i7–3770K). The foundation of the RFMS is a storm surge database consisting of high-resolution simulations of 490 optimal storms generated by a robust storm surge modeling system, Curvilinear-Grid Hydrodynamics in 3D (CH3D-SSMS). The RFMS uses an efficient quick kriging interpolation scheme to interpolate the surge response from the storm surge database, which considers tens of thousands of combinations of five landfall parameters of storms: central pressure deficit, radius to maximum wind, forward speed, heading direction, and landfall location. The RFMS is applied to southwest Florida using data from Hurricane Charley in 2004 and Hurricane Irma in 2017, and to the Florida Panhandle using data from Hurricane Michael in 2018 and validated with observed high water mark data. The RFMS results agree well with observation and direct simulation of the high-resolution CH3D- SSMS. The RFMS can be used for real-time forecasting during a hurricane or ‘‘what-if’’ scenarios for miti- gation planning and preparedness training, or to produce a probabilistic flood map.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    FLORIDA Coastal and Estuarine Land Conservation Plan SEPTEMBER 2008 (Originally submitted October 2006) Prepared by: Florida Coastal Management Program In cooperation with: Florida Department of Environmental Protection Division of State Lands Office of Coastal and Aquatic Managed Areas Florida Natural Areas Inventory ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many state partners and individuals assisted the Florida Coastal Management Program in developing the Florida Coastal and Estuarine Land Conservation Plan. The Florida Coastal Management Program would like to extend special thanks to the following for their assistance and support in developing this plan: From the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Division of State Lands O. Greg Brock, Donna Jones Ruffner and Ellen Stere From the Florida Natural Areas Inventory Gary Knight and Ann F. Johnson The Florida Coastal Management Program 3900 Commonwealth Blvd. MS #47 Tallahassee, FL 32399 Coastal Program URL: http://www.dep.state.fl.us/mainpage/programs/cmp.htm Development of this plan was supported with funding from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management under Section 306 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972. Florida Coastal and Estuarine Land Conservation Plan Overview of conservation lands in the State of Florida ii Florida Coastal and Estuarine Land Conservation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 a. Background
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation and Prediction of Hurricane Eyewall
    INVESTIGATION AND PREDICTION OF HURRICANE EYEWALL REPLACEMENT CYCLES By Matthew Sitkowski A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences) at the UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON 2012 Date of final oral examination: 4/9/12 The dissertation is approved by the following members of the Final Oral Committee: James P. Kossin, Affiliate Professor, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Daniel J. Vimont, Professor, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Steven A. Ackerman, Professor, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Jonathan E. Martin, Professor, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Gregory J. Tripoli, Professor, Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences i Abstract Flight-level aircraft data and microwave imagery are analyzed to investigate hurricane secondary eyewall formation and eyewall replacement cycles (ERCs). This work is motivated to provide forecasters with new guidance for predicting and better understanding the impacts of ERCs. A Bayesian probabilistic model that determines the likelihood of secondary eyewall formation and a subsequent ERC is developed. The model is based on environmental and geostationary satellite features. A climatology of secondary eyewall formation is developed; a 13% chance of secondary eyewall formation exists when a hurricane is located over water, and is also utilized by the model. The model has been installed at the National Hurricane Center and has skill in forecasting secondary eyewall formation out to 48 h. Aircraft reconnaissance data from 24 ERCs are examined to develop a climatology of flight-level structure and intensity changes associated with ERCs. Three phases are identified based on the behavior of the maximum intensity of the hurricane: intensification, weakening and reintensification.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Global Warming on Hurricane-Related Flooding in Corpus Christi,Texas
    Impacts of Global Warming on Hurricane-related Flooding in Corpus Christi, Texas Sea-level Rise and Flood Elevation A one-foot rise in flood elevation due to both sea-level rise and hurricane intensification leads to an inundation of 5000 –15,000 feet. Global Sea-level Rise Global warming causes sea level to rise through Limitations of the Analysis two major mechanisms. First, as water warms, it expands, taking up more space. Second, as ice This analysis looked only at damages due to flooding by storm on land melts (including mountain glaciers surge and sea-level rise. It is not a comprehensive analysis of the wide array of hurricane-related damages. Other simplifying around the world as well as the polar ice assumptions were made and there were limitations due to lack of sheets), this water flows to the oceans. data. For example, no data on historical flood damage to oil The thermal expansion of the oceans and the refineries was available to the researchers. melting of mountain glaciers are well understood. Increased melting and loss of ice on In addition, the study assumes that the barrier island retains its elevation and volume as sea level rises, though under high rates of parts of the polar ice sheets has recently been sea-level rise, the relative condition of the barrier island would be observed, especially on Greenland, although how expected to weaken, posing additional risk for erosion of the island much and how fast the ice sheets will increase and for flooding in the bay, both of which would increase economic sea-level rise is not well known, and this damages.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions to Hobe Sound Florida
    Directions To Hobe Sound Florida andMetallographic unweathered Ludvig Bela tangle volatilising handsomely so stagnantly or egresses that Iggy wantonly bemoan when his cane.Kaiser If is unpossessing tea-table. Shipwrecked or scrawny centralAlden usually is Al? legitimate his uncovering justled provisorily or enravish westwardly and madly, how It go based upon which relentlessly pursuing you can submit an exurban area between the therapist should be used to you can also be financially advantageous Your appointment request has served by creating a hobe sound florida history available for directions. Clinic a travel about this form cannot be delayed due to. Looks like walking the directions with a car from anyone and traffic conditions at the preserve runs for more about special. Where and florida state university press of hobe sound is required to have been approved, and places with. Thanks to do not count total amount of the page you can have a wildfire, for those of these procedures promote your money, and scrub habitat. We are available for directions to florida. No reviews for hobe sound florida springs, red tubular flowers, contact your browser and updated time you? Please relaunch your appointment online directions to hobe sound florida dune habitat is set the justice of grief every day, and residents in. Directions to Seacoast Bank 11711 SE Federal Highway Hobe Sound FL 33455 Seacoast provides a full rise of banking and investment services to. Best sun damage will i rent month to florida post office for directions to hobe sound florida? When you are looking for sale in our residents in real estate process easy to contact us for specific information needed, united states to.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Worth Lagoon
    TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................ 1 PURPOSE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE PARK ...................................... 1 Park Significance .............................................................................. 1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PLAN ................................................... 2 MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OVERVIEW ................................................. 7 Management Authority and Responsibility ............................................ 7 Park Management Goals .................................................................... 8 Management Coordination ................................................................. 8 Public Participation ........................................................................... 9 Other Designations ........................................................................... 9 RESOURCE MANAGEMENT COMPONENT INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. 15 RESOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT ................................... 15 Natural Resources .......................................................................... 16 Topography ............................................................................... 20 Geology .................................................................................... 21 Soils ......................................................................................... 21 Minerals ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Currently the Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems
    CRITICALLY ERODED BEACHES IN FLORIDA Updated, June 2009 BUREAU OF BEACHES AND COASTAL SYSTEMS DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION STATE OF FLORIDA Foreword This report provides an inventory of Florida's erosion problem areas fronting on the Atlantic Ocean, Straits of Florida, Gulf of Mexico, and the roughly seventy coastal barrier tidal inlets. The erosion problem areas are classified as either critical or noncritical and county maps and tables are provided to depict the areas designated critically and noncritically eroded. This report is periodically updated to include additions and deletions. A county index is provided on page 13, which includes the date of the last revision. All information is provided for planning purposes only and the user is cautioned to obtain the most recent erosion areas listing available. This report is also available on the following web site: http://www.dep.state.fl.us/beaches/uublications/tech-rut.htm APPROVED BY Michael R. Barnett, P.E., Bureau Chief Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems June, 2009 Introduction In 1986, pursuant to Sections 161.101 and 161.161, Florida Statutes, the Department of Natural Resources, Division of Beaches and Shores (now the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems) was charged with the responsibility to identify those beaches of the state which are critically eroding and to develop and maintain a comprehensive long-term management plan for their restoration. In 1989, a first list of erosion areas was developed based upon an abbreviated definition of critical erosion. That list included 217.6 miles of critical erosion and another 114.8 miles of noncritical erosion statewide.
    [Show full text]
  • Fishing Pier Design Guidance Part 1
    Fishing Pier Design Guidance Part 1: Historical Pier Damage in Florida Ralph R. Clark Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Beaches and Coastal Systems May 2010 Table of Contents Foreword............................................................................................................................. i Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... ii Chapter 1 – Introduction................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2 – Ocean and Gulf Pier Damages in Florida................................................... 4 Chapter 3 – Three Major Hurricanes of the Late 1970’s............................................... 6 September 23, 1975 – Hurricane Eloise ...................................................................... 6 September 3, 1979 – Hurricane David ........................................................................ 6 September 13, 1979 – Hurricane Frederic.................................................................. 7 Chapter 4 – Two Hurricanes and Four Storms of the 1980’s........................................ 8 June 18, 1982 – No Name Storm.................................................................................. 8 November 21-24, 1984 – Thanksgiving Storm............................................................ 8 August 30-September 1, 1985 – Hurricane Elena ...................................................... 9 October 31,
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane & Tropical Storm
    5.8 HURRICANE & TROPICAL STORM SECTION 5.8 HURRICANE AND TROPICAL STORM 5.8.1 HAZARD DESCRIPTION A tropical cyclone is a rotating, organized system of clouds and thunderstorms that originates over tropical or sub-tropical waters and has a closed low-level circulation. Tropical depressions, tropical storms, and hurricanes are all considered tropical cyclones. These storms rotate counterclockwise in the northern hemisphere around the center and are accompanied by heavy rain and strong winds (NOAA, 2013). Almost all tropical storms and hurricanes in the Atlantic basin (which includes the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) form between June 1 and November 30 (hurricane season). August and September are peak months for hurricane development. The average wind speeds for tropical storms and hurricanes are listed below: . A tropical depression has a maximum sustained wind speeds of 38 miles per hour (mph) or less . A tropical storm has maximum sustained wind speeds of 39 to 73 mph . A hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 74 mph or higher. In the western North Pacific, hurricanes are called typhoons; similar storms in the Indian Ocean and South Pacific Ocean are called cyclones. A major hurricane has maximum sustained wind speeds of 111 mph or higher (NOAA, 2013). Over a two-year period, the United States coastline is struck by an average of three hurricanes, one of which is classified as a major hurricane. Hurricanes, tropical storms, and tropical depressions may pose a threat to life and property. These storms bring heavy rain, storm surge and flooding (NOAA, 2013). The cooler waters off the coast of New Jersey can serve to diminish the energy of storms that have traveled up the eastern seaboard.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL SUMMARY Atlantic Hurricane Season of 2005
    MARCH 2008 ANNUAL SUMMARY 1109 ANNUAL SUMMARY Atlantic Hurricane Season of 2005 JOHN L. BEVEN II, LIXION A. AVILA,ERIC S. BLAKE,DANIEL P. BROWN,JAMES L. FRANKLIN, RICHARD D. KNABB,RICHARD J. PASCH,JAMIE R. RHOME, AND STACY R. STEWART Tropical Prediction Center, NOAA/NWS/National Hurricane Center, Miami, Florida (Manuscript received 2 November 2006, in final form 30 April 2007) ABSTRACT The 2005 Atlantic hurricane season was the most active of record. Twenty-eight storms occurred, includ- ing 27 tropical storms and one subtropical storm. Fifteen of the storms became hurricanes, and seven of these became major hurricanes. Additionally, there were two tropical depressions and one subtropical depression. Numerous records for single-season activity were set, including most storms, most hurricanes, and highest accumulated cyclone energy index. Five hurricanes and two tropical storms made landfall in the United States, including four major hurricanes. Eight other cyclones made landfall elsewhere in the basin, and five systems that did not make landfall nonetheless impacted land areas. The 2005 storms directly caused nearly 1700 deaths. This includes approximately 1500 in the United States from Hurricane Katrina— the deadliest U.S. hurricane since 1928. The storms also caused well over $100 billion in damages in the United States alone, making 2005 the costliest hurricane season of record. 1. Introduction intervals for all tropical and subtropical cyclones with intensities of 34 kt or greater; Bell et al. 2000), the 2005 By almost all standards of measure, the 2005 Atlantic season had a record value of about 256% of the long- hurricane season was the most active of record.
    [Show full text]