DOCSLIB.ORG

Certificate Kuehne + Nagel International AG

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Certificate Kuehne + Nagel International AG Certificate Following the successful completion of the program is recognized as CEIV Pharma Certified according to CEIV Pharma Checklist V. Category Name Here This certification is valid from: DD Month YEAR This certification is valid until: DD Month YEAR Alexandre de Juniac Director General and CEO, IATA CEIV PHARMA: CEIV-PIL- Date of CEIV Pharma Location / Airport Region / Continent Country Validity Certification No. of certificate Juan Santamaría International Airport (SJO) Central America Costa Rica 15/Jan/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0001 Schindellegi, Switzerland Europe Switzerland 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0002 EuroAirport Basel Mulhouse Freiburg (BSL) Europe Switzerland 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0003 Lugano Airport (LUG) Europe Switzerland 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0004 Zurich Airport (ZRH) Europe Switzerland 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0005 Buenos Aires Metropolitan Airports (BUE) South America Argentina 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0006 Melbourne Airport (MEL) Asia Pacific Australia 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0007 Innsbruck Airport (INN) Europe Austria 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0008 Vienna International Airport (VIE) Europe Austria 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0009 Brussels Airport (BRU) Europe Belgium 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0010 Sao Paulo International Airport (GRU) South America Brazil 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0011 Sydney Airport (SYD) Asia Pacific Australia 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0012 Montréal–Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport (YUL) North America Canada 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0013 Toronto Pearson International Airport (YYZ) North America Canada 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0014 Arturo Merino Benítez Airport (SCL) South America Chile 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0015 Beijing Capital International Airport (PEK) Asia China 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0016 Hong Kong International Airport (HKG) Asia Hong Kong 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0017 Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport (CAN) Asia China 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0018 Shanghai Pudong International Airport (PVG) Asia China 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0019 El Dorado International Airport (BOG) South America Colombia 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0020 Copenhagen Airport (CPH) Europe Denmark 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0021 Cairo International Airport (CAI) Africa Egypt 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0022 Helsinki Airport (HEL) Europe Finland 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0023 Lyon-Saint Exupéry Airport (LYS) Europe France 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0024 Charles de Gaulle Airport (CDG) Europe France 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0025 Berlin-Tegel Airport (TXL) Europe Germany 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0026 Stuttgart Airport (STR) Europe Germany 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0027 Düsseldorf Airport (DUS) Europe Germany 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0028 Frankfurt Airport (FRA) Europe Germany 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0029 Hannover Airport (HAJ) Europe Germany 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0030 Date of CEIV Pharma Location / Airport Region / Continent Country Validity Certification No. of certificate Budapest Airport (BUD) Europe Hungary 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0031 Kempegowda International Airport Bengaluru (BLR) Asia Pacific India 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0032 Chennai International Airport (MAA) Asia Pacific India 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0033 Rajiv Gandhi International Airport (HYD) Asia Pacific India 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0034 Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport (BOM) Asia Pacific India 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0035 Indira Gandhi International Airport (DEL) Asia Pacific India 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0036 Juanda International Airport (SUB) Asia Pacific Indonesia 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0037 Dublin Airport Logistics Park (DUB) Europe Ireland 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0038 Ben Gurion International Airport (TLV) Middle East Israel 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0039 Milan Malpensa Airport (MXP) Europe Italy 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0040 Segrate Airport (SWK) Europe Italy 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0041 Fiumicino Airport (FCO) Europe Italy 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0042 Kansai Airports (KIX) Asia Pacific Japan 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0043 Haneda Airport (HND) Asia Pacific Japan 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0044 Jomo Kenyatta International Airport (NBO) Africa Kenya 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0045 Seoul - All Airports (SEL) Asia Pacific Korea 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0046 Luxembourg Airport (LUX) Europe Luxembourg 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0047 Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KUL) Asia Pacific Malaysia 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0048 Penang International Airport (PEN) Asia Pacific Malaysia 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0049 Auckland Airport (AKL) Europe New Zealand 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0050 Tocumen International Airport (PTY) Central America Panama 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0051 Warsaw Chopin Airport (WAW) Europe Poland 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0052 Changi Airport Singapore (SIN) Asia Singapore 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0053 King Abdulaziz International Airport (JED) Middle East Saudi Arabia 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0054 King Khalid International Airport (RUH) Middle East Saudi Arabia 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0055 O.R. Tambo International Airport (JNB) Africa South Africa 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0056 Barcelona El Prat Airport (BCN) Europe Spain 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0057 Adolfo Suárez Madrid-Barajas Airport (MAD) Europe Spain 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0058 Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport (TPE) Asia Taiwan 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0059 Suvarnabhumi Airport (BKK) Asia Pacific Thailand 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0060 Date of CEIV Pharma Location / Airport Region / Continent Country Validity Certification No. of certificate Istanbul Airport (IST) Middle East Turkey 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0061 Dubai International Airport (DXB) Middle East United Arab Emirates 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0062 Heathrow Airport (LHR) Europe United Kingdom 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0063 Birmingham Airport (BHX) Europe United Kingdom 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0064 Boston Logan International Airport (BOS) North America United States 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0065 O'Hare International Airport (ORD) North America United States 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0066 John Glenn Columbus International Airport (CMH) North America United States 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0067 Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (DFW) North America United States 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0068 Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) North America United States 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0069 Indianapolis International Airport (IND) North America United States 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0070 Kansas City International Airport (KCK) North America United States 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0071 Philadelphia International Airport (PHL) North America United States 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0072 Miami International Airport (MIA) North America United States 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0074 John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) North America United States 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0075 St. Louis Lambert International Airport (STL) North America United States 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0076 San Diego International Airport (SAN) North America United States 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0077 San Francisco International Airport (SFO) North America United States 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0078 Tampa International Airport (TPA) North America United States 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0079 Oslo Airport (OSL) Europe Norway 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0080 Mexico City International Airport (MEX) North America Mexico 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0081 Luis Muñoz Marín International Airport (SJU) North America United States 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0082 Aeropuerto Internacional de Carrasco (MVD) South America Uruguay 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0083 Newcastle International Airport (NCL) Europe United Kingdom 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0084 Manchester Airport (MAN) Europe United Kingdom 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0085 Igor Sikorsky Kyiv International Airport (IEV) Europe Ukraine 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0086 Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (ATL) North America United States 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0087 Stockholm Arlanda Airport (ARN) Europe Sweden 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0088 Amsterdam Airport Schiphol (AMS) Europe Netherlands 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0089 Jorge Chavez International Airport (LIM) South America Peru 15/Feb/20 31/Jan/23 CEIV-PIL-20-0090 Date of CEIV Pharma Location / Airport Region / Continent Country Validity Certification No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Do Regional Airlines in Eastern Europe Have the Right to Survive in the European Single Sky Environment?
    AVIATION ISSN 1648-7788 / eISSN 1822-4180 2017 Volume 21(4): 155–161 doi:10.3846/16487788.2017.1415226 DO REGIONAL AIRLINES IN EASTERN EUROPE HAVE THE RIGHT TO SURVIVE IN THE EUROPEAN SINGLE SKY ENVIRONMENT? Sven KUKEMELK1, 2 1Nordic Aviation Group, Sepise 1, Tallinn, 11415, Estonia 2Tallinn University of Technology, Department of Economics and Business Administration, Akadeemia tee 3, Tallinn, 12618, Estonia E-mail: [email protected] Received 15 June 2017; accepted 06 December 2017 Sven KUKEMELK Education: Estonian Aviation Academy (2010), Vilnius Gediminas Technical University (2012), Tallinn University of Technology, PhD studies (since 2013). Experience: 7 years of experience in network planning and aviation business analysis. Research interests: network planning, fleet development, commercial management. Present position: CEO of Nordic Aviation Advisory, Executive Director for Business Development at Nordic Aviation Group. Abstract. The European aviation market can be characterised by extreme growth and turbulence ever since the markets were deregulated and low cost carriers emerged on the continent. Initially the biggest toll was paid by main legacy carriers when low costs emerged on trunk routes, which lead to the bankruptcy of Sabena, Swiss airlines and Spanair. However, once big legacy carriers started merging and creating more alliances, sustainability was once again reached. Despite this, as low cost carriers entered the Eastern-European market and looked to stimulate even smaller regional routes, smaller carriers started to suffer. This article is assessing the status quo of the current European region- al aviation, highlighting the recent trends and ultimately coming to a conclusion that regional airlines can be sustaina- ble provided that certain key criteria have been met.
    [Show full text]
  • EQUINIX INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS EXCHANGE™ (IBX®) and Xscale™ DATA CENTER QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE
    EQUINIX INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS EXCHANGE™ (IBX®) AND xSCALE™ DATA CENTER QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE Updated July 2021 NORTH AMERICA IBX ADDRESS LOCATION OWNERSHIP COLO SQ M COLO SQ FT BUILDING TYPE AT1 Atlanta 180 Peachtree Street NW • 11 mi (18 km) from Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta Intl Leased 7,469 80,397 6-story, reinforced steel and concrete with 2nd, 3rd and 6th Floors Airport (ATL) brick face Atlanta, GA 30303 AT2 Atlanta 56 Marietta Street NW • 11 mi (18 km) from Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta Intl Leased 602 6,475 10-story, concrete steel structure, glass 5th Floor Airport (ATL) face Atlanta, GA 30303 AT3 Atlanta 56 Marietta Street NW • 11 mi (18 km) from Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta Intl Leased 872 9,390 10-story, concrete steel structure, glass 6th Floor Airport (ATL) face Atlanta, GA 30303 AT4 Atlanta 450 Interstate North Parkway • 21 mi (34 km) from Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta Intl Owned 6,204 66,774 2-story, steel-framed building with Atlanta, GA 30339 Airport (ATL) concrete block over steel frame AT5 Atlanta 2836 Peterson Place NW • 28 mi (45 km) from Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta Intl Leased 1,982 21,337 1-story, steel-framed building with Norcross, GA 30071 Airport (ATL) concrete block and brick veneer BO2 Boston 41 Alexander Road • 21 mi (33 km) from Logan Intl Airport (BOS) Owned 7,036 75,734 1-story, tilt-up concrete panels over steel Billerica, MA 01821 CH1 Chicago 350 East Cermak Road • 10 mi (17 km) from Midway Intl Airport (MDW) Leased 4,737 50,992 9-story (main section), two-way flat slab 5th Floor concrete construction (existing
    [Show full text]
  • Facts & Figures & Figures
    OCTOBER 2019 FACTS & FIGURES & FIGURES THE STAR ALLIANCE NETWORK RADAR The Star Alliance network was created in 1997 to better meet the needs of the frequent international traveller. MANAGEMENT INFORMATION Combined Total of the current Star Alliance member airlines: FOR ALLIANCE EXECUTIVES Total revenue: 179.04 BUSD Revenue Passenger 1,739,41 bn Km: Daily departures: More than Annual Passengers: 762,27 m 19,000 Countries served: 195 Number of employees: 431,500 Airports served: Over 1,300 Fleet: 5,013 Lounges: More than 1,000 MEMBER AIRLINES Aegean Airlines is Greece’s largest airline providing at its inception in 1999 until today, full service, premium quality short and medium haul services. In 2013, AEGEAN acquired Olympic Air and through the synergies obtained, network, fleet and passenger numbers expanded fast. The Group welcomed 14m passengers onboard its flights in 2018. The Company has been honored with the Skytrax World Airline award, as the best European regional airline in 2018. This was the 9th time AEGEAN received the relevant award. Among other distinctions, AEGEAN captured the 5th place, in the world's 20 best airlines list (outside the U.S.) in 2018 Readers' Choice Awards survey of Condé Nast Traveler. In June 2018 AEGEAN signed a Purchase Agreement with Airbus, for the order of up to 42 new generation aircraft of the 1 MAY 2019 FACTS & FIGURES A320neo family and plans to place additional orders with lessors for up to 20 new A/C of the A320neo family. For more information please visit www.aegeanair.com. Total revenue: USD 1.10 bn Revenue Passenger Km: 11.92 m Daily departures: 139 Annual Passengers: 7.19 m Countries served: 44 Number of employees: 2,498 Airports served: 134 Joined Star Alliance: June 2010 Fleet size: 49 Aircraft Types: A321 – 200, A320 – 200, A319 – 200 Hub Airport: Athens Airport bases: Thessaloniki, Heraklion, Rhodes, Kalamata, Chania, Larnaka Current as of: 14 MAY 19 Air Canada is Canada's largest domestic and international airline serving nearly 220 airports on six continents.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday, 7 July 2020
    Tuesday, 7 July 2020 Traffic Situation & Airlines Recovery • 12,331 flights on Tuesday 7 July (up to 55% with +3,035 movements compared to Tuesday 30 June). This is about 35% of 2019 levels. • Significant increase since 1 July for many airlines, in particular Ryanair with 714 additional flights compared to 2 weeks before (+328%). Most airlines further increased their operations on 7 July, in particular easyJet (+339%), Wizz Air (+906%), Eurowings (+123%), Vueling (+300%), Alitalia (+78%). • British Airways had only a limited number of flights (103) on 7 July compared to normal operations. • Expect to reach 50% of 2019 levels in the first weeks of August with 18,000 flights, in line with latest traffic scenarios published by EUROCONTROL on 24 April. • Significant increase in southern States over the last 2 weeks with +130% for Spain, +63% for Italy, +115% for Greece and +122% for Portugal. • All-cargo flights stable. Business aviation recovering faster reaching -22% (15% of total flights on 5 July). Traffic Flows & Country Pairs • The major traffic flow is the intra-Europe flow with 10,634 flights on 7 July. Traffic flows have increased over the last 2 weeks. Intra-Europe flights increased by 47% but are still -62% vs 2019. • Top 8 flows are domestic flows. However, flows to/from southern European countries (Germany-Spain +169%, UK-Spain +180%, Germany-Turkey +83%, Italy-Spain +224%, France-Spain +209%, Netherlands- Spain +300%, Germany-Greece +231%) are showing significant increase over the last 2 weeks. Situation outside Europe • China: o Domestic traffic is constantly increasing since mid-April reaching 9,193 flights on 6 July.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution No 173/2017
    RM-111-163-17 RESOLUTION NO 173/2017 OF THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS of 7 November 2017 on the adoption of the Investment Preparation and Implementation Concept: Solidarity Airport – Central Transport Hub for the Republic of Poland The Council of Ministers adopts the following: § 1. The Council of Ministers recognises that it is in line with the Government policy to take measures described in the document entitled Investment Preparation and Implementation Concept: Solidarity Airport – Central Transport Hub for the Republic of Poland, hereinafter referred to as “Concept”, that constitutes an attachment to this Resolution. § 2. The Plenipotentiary of the Government for the Matters of the Central Transport Hub for the Republic of Poland shall be obliged to take measures described in the Concept. § 3. The resolution shall enter into force on the day of its adoption. PRIME MINISTER BEATA SZYDŁO Checked for compliance with legal and editorial terms Secretary of the Council of Ministers Jolanta Rusiniak Director of the Department of the Council of Ministers Hanka Babińska Attachment to Resolution No. 173/2017 of the Council of Ministers of 7 November 2017 Investment Preparation and Implementation Concept: Solidarity Airport – Central Transport Hub for the Republic of Poland Warsaw, November 2017 1 Table of contents: I. Synthesis ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 II. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Polish Airports
    TRANSPORT PROBLEMS 2020 Volume 15 Issue 4 Part 2 PROBLEMY TRANSPORTU DOI: 10.21307/tp-2020-067 Keywords: air transport; airport; environment; solar panels Dariusz TŁOCZYŃSKI* University of Gdansk, Faculty of Economics Armii Krajowej 119/121, 81-824 Sopot, Poland Małgorzata WACH-KLOSKOWSKA WSB University in Gdansk, Faculty of Finance and Management Grunwaldzka Av. 238, 80-266 Gdańsk, Poland Rodrigo MARTIN-ROJAS University of Granada, Faculty of Business and Economics Campus de Cartuja s/n, 18071, Granada, Spain *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] AN ASSESSMENT OF AIRPORT SUSTAINABILITY MEASURES: A CASE STUDY OF POLISH AIRPORTS Summary. Air transport, like every economic branch, strives for development. Air traffic is growing dynamically, which means that the natural environment is increasingly being polluted each year. Therefore, entities operating in the air transport sector should care for the environment. One of these entities - airports - introduces many restrictions for aircraft with high CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions. At the same time, they introduce many ecological activities. Every year, also at the largest Polish airports, managers carry out activities aimed at caring for the environment. The main goal of the article is to evaluate the implementation of ongoing projects related to environmental protection at selected Polish airports. For this purpose, a survey was conducted at Polish airports in March 2020. The main research thesis is that as a result of the development of air traffic, airports will start investing more in innovative solutions related to environmental protection, including solar panels. This issue is extremely important from the point of view of economic, environmental, and corporate social responsibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Transport Hub Building Poland’S New Transfer Airport
    Central Transport Hub Building Poland’s New Transfer Airport Central Transport Hub Building Poland’s New Transfer Airport Executive summary Worldwide, in 2018 4.3 billion people travelled on scheduled flights, a 6.5% increase from the year before. According to the industry organization IATA, in 2019 this number may rise by a further 6%, to 4.6 billion passengers. Every year air travel increases its role in the growth of business and tourism. It also exerts a substan- tial influence on investments and migration. The Polish aviation industry is still modest, however, constituting a bit over 1% of global air traffic. Air transport also plays a crucial role in the carriage of goods, representing up to 35% of global trade value. Aircraft carry high-value, low-weight cargo, such as computer chips, as well as, more and more often, e-commerce packages. These are goods with the highest influence on creating added value in the economy. However, Poland is still in the periphery when it comes to air cargo transport. Both kinds of air transport−passenger and cargo−are concentrated at hub airports. Cities and countries where such hubs are located gain tangible bene- fits: economic, social and political. There are currently no major hub airports in Poland or Central & Eastern Europe. Warsaw Chopin Airport, the largest airport in this part of the continent, does not rank among the top 30 European airports by passengers per year. Thus passengers travelling from Poland (especially in case of intercontinental flights) must fly with transfers. The main hubs handling traffic from Poland are Frankfurt and Munich, London Heathrow, Paris Charles de Gaulle, Amsterdam, Moscow Sheremetyevo, Dubai, and Doha.
    [Show full text]
  • Methodology EN – Dataset – MCA – Omio
    Methodology Stress-free Travel: The Most Convenient European Capital Airports The ranking of airports in Europe that offer a stress-free and convenient travel experience was determined by examining all European capital cities. If a capital city had more than one airport, the main international airport, defined as the one with the largest number of international flights, was selected. To create the ranking of the most convenient airports in Europe, all airports were analysed according to 17 factors that were grouped into four data-clusters: connectivity​, f​ acilities​, e​ ntertainment ​and s​ tress​. These were then weighted according to the level of influence airport operators can exert on each data cluster. Since “facilities” and “entertainment” can be determined by airport operators, they were deemed important data clusters when determining the level of convenience, weighing 40 percent each of the final score. However, airport operators have less influence on “stress” and “connectivity,” so both data clusters contribute to only 10 percent of the final score, since the punctuality of airlines, the geographical location and the availability of public transit options to reach the airport, for instance, cannot be controlled by the managing body of the airport. Research factors and sources Data cluster one: Connectivity (10%) ● Distance: ​The linear distance in kilometres between the capital’s main train ​ station and the airport was determined using G​ oogle Maps​. ● Public transport: ​The number of public transit options connecting the main ​ airport to the city centre was sourced from the official information provided by airport operators. Shuttle services were not included unless there were no other public transit options available.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview Munich Airport Expanding Europe's Aviation
    C O MM UN IQ U É A U T U M N 2 0 1 1 WWW.ACI-EUROPE.ORG INTERVIEW Carolyn McCall, CEO, easyJet MUNICH AIRPORT Advancing with Runway 3 EXPANDING EUROPE’S AVIATION MARKET ACI EUROPE launches campaign EUROPEAN AVIATION CRISIS CELL Rapid reaction to volcanic ash crises ISSUE SPONSORED BY: OMNI SERV PROVIDES INNOVATIVE AND DEPENDABLE SOLUTIONS TO THE AVIATION INDUSTRY ★ Omniserv Ltd is the European arm of Airserv Corp, Headquartered near Heathrow Airport, the Company provides security and passenger services to Airport Authorities and Airlines at Leeds Bradford International Airport, Manchester and Heathrow. ★ Omniserv is experienced at acquiring contracts under the European ‘TUPE’ legislation which requires the transfer of existing contracted personnel. Recent contract awards both at Leeds Bradford International Airport and Heathrow have underpinned the Company’s reputation for ‘seamless’ transfer of operations and through group training and motivational programmes, a measureable improvement in both compliance and customer service. ★ Omniserv is well positioned to provide cost effective, compliant and customer focused security services at Heathrow Airport where we currently employ over 600 people on Airline Specifi c Security operations as well as Passenger Services to all airlines in the handling of their passengers with reduced mobility (PRMs). ★ OmniServ was selected from a tender participation of 19 companies, including the two incumbent suppliers, to be the fi rst company to provide services to passengers with reduced mobility (PRM) across
    [Show full text]
  • Securing Smart Airports
    Securing Smart Airports DECEMBER 2016 www.enisa.europa.eu European Union Agency For Network And Information Security Securing Smart Airports December 2016 About ENISA The European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA) is a centre of network and information security expertise for the EU, its Member States (MS), the private sector and Europe’s citizens. ENISA works with these groups to develop advice and recommendations on good practice in information security. It assists EU MS in implementing relevant EU legislation and works to improve the resilience of Europe’s critical information infrastructure and networks. ENISA seeks to enhance existing expertise in EU MS by supporting the development of cross-border communities committed to improving network and information security throughout the EU. More information about ENISA and its work can be found at www.enisa.europa.eu. Acknowledgements Over the course of this study, we have received valuable input and feedback from: Jean-Jacques Woeldgen, European Commission Vicente De-Frutos-Cristobal, European Commission Jean-Paul Moreaux, European Aviation Safety Agency Zarko Sivcev, EUROCONTROL Charles de Couëssin, ID Partners Khan Ferdous Wahid, Airbus Fillippos Komninos, Athens International Airport David Trembaczowski-Ryder, ACI Europe Francesco Di Maio, ENAV Theodoros Kiritsis, IFATSEA Costas Christoforou, IFATSEA Alcus Erasmus, Manchester Airport Alexander Doehne, Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Iakovos Ouranos, Heraklion Airport Charles Badjaksezian, Geneva Airport Chris Johnson, Glasgow University Tim Steeds, British Airways Morten Fruensgaard, AVINOR Matt Shreeve, Helios Ruben Flohr, SESAR Joint Undertaking Giuliano D'Auria, Leonardo-Finmeccanica Philippe-Emmanuel Maulion, SITA ADP Group Amadeus Zurich Airport 02 Securing Smart Airports December 2016 Legal notice Notice must be taken that this publication represents the views and interpretations of the authors and editors, unless stated otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spatial Dimension of Competition Among Airports at Worldwide Level: a Spatial Stochastic Frontier Analysis
    The spatial dimension of competition among airports at worldwide level: a spatial stochastic frontier analysis Angela S. Bergantino1 Mario Intini2 Nicola Volta3 Abstract In the last decade, academic literature posed a great focus on the estimation of airport efficiency and productivity. One of the main interests has been the analysis of potential impact of airport competition on cost and technical efficiency. The novelty of our research lies in applying a spatial approach which allows for the inclusion of a distance matrix and a shared destinations matrix calibrated for different distances to estimate the impact of competition on efficiencies. By analysing statistical differences between a traditional and a spatial model, it is possible to identify possible competition effects. In this study, we analyse 206 airports for the year 2015 located in Europe, North America, and Pacific Asia sourced from the ATRS database. Our results show the existence of a spatial component which is not captured by the traditional stochastic frontier analysis. We find that competition has an effect on the efficiency level of an airport, and moreover, these effects can be positive or negative depending on the distance considered in the spatial model. 1Department of Economics, Management and Business Law, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy. Email: [email protected] 2Department of Economics, Management and Business Law, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy. Email: [email protected] 3 Centre for Air Transport Management, Cranfield University, UK. Email: [email protected] 1. Introduction Airport infrastructures strongly determine the socio-economic structure of a territory. They influence the choices of individuals, create new residential and productive settlements, and promote new job opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • North Sea – Baltic Core Network Corridor Study
    North Sea – Baltic Core Network Corridor Study Final Report December 2014 TransportTransportll North Sea – Baltic Final Report Mandatory disclaimer The information and views set out in this Final Report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission's behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. December 2014 !! The!Study!of!the!North!Sea!/!Baltic!Core!Network!Corridor,!Final!Report! ! ! December!2014! Final&Report& ! of!the!PROXIMARE!Consortium!to!the!European!Commission!on!the! ! The$Study$of$the$North$Sea$–$Baltic$ Core$Network$Corridor$ ! Prepared!and!written!by!Proximare:! •!Triniti!! •!Malla!Paajanen!Consulting!! •!Norton!Rose!Fulbright!LLP! •!Goudappel!Coffeng! •!IPG!Infrastruktur/!und!Projektentwicklungsgesellschaft!mbH! With!input!by!the!following!subcontractors:! •!University!of!Turku,!Brahea!Centre! •!Tallinn!University,!Estonian!Institute!for!Future!Studies! •!STS/Consulting! •!Nacionalinių!projektų!rengimas!(NPR)! •ILiM! •!MINT! Proximare!wishes!to!thank!the!representatives!of!the!European!Commission!and!the!Member! States!for!their!positive!approach!and!cooperation!in!the!preparation!of!this!Progress!Report! as!well!as!the!Consortium’s!Associate!Partners,!subcontractors!and!other!organizations!that! have!been!contacted!in!the!course!of!the!Study.! The!information!and!views!set!out!in!this!Final!Report!are!those!of!the!authors!and!do!not!
    [Show full text]