<<

The 1995 Blog

How important was ?

Technologist , the developer of JavaScript programming language and a founder of the Foundation, asserted in a blog post the other day that Netscape “changed history” — and it’s futile to mount a credible argument to the contrary.

Netscape, the mid- maker of Navigator, the first widely popular browser, was critically important to the technology, the culture, and the perceptions of the early Web.

Eich’s post at the online information site Quora was in response to the question: “How important was Netscape?”

His comments were technical, pointing to JavaScript and the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) encryption protocol as “two things Netscape created.”

Both indeed were important innovations which, respectively, helped animate the Web and helped make Internet transactions more secure. Both, as Eich noted, are “still fundamental to the Web and ecommerce today.”

He added: “To say Netscape did not ‘change history’ is to say Napoleon (even though he failed — twice!) did not change history.”

Fair enough.

But Eich may have been too modest; he might well have expanded his discussion to address how Netscape was critically important to the early Web in ways less tangible than JavaScript and SSL.

For starters, there was the evocative name: “Netscape” was perfect for the early Web, suggesting that the online world was, as Steve Silberman once wrote, much more than “a display, a tool, an application, an e-anything, but a place — a newly discovered, unmapped infinitude.”

“‘Netscape,'” he wrote, effectively “announced that the frontier was open for exploration and habitation.”

The Navigator browser brought the Internet to untold millions of people, and I’d wager that many of those mid-1990s first-time users still think fondly of Netscape and the funky, outer-space logo that lit up with what looked to be comets or shooting stars when the browser was making a connection.

The novelist Charles Yu recalled in a brief essay published last year his introduction to Netscape: “I entered college in 1993 and graduated in 1997. Halfway through, the Internet became a thing. Netscape said: ‘Here you go, here’s a door to a brand-new place in the existence of the universe. We just started leing people in. Go ahead, it’s fun. It’ll keep geing bigger for the rest of your life.’”

Netscape was, as I write in my forthcoming book, 1995: The Year the Future Began, “an immensely interesting company” as well. Its leading figures, Mike Cassidy of the San Jose Mercury News once observed, seemed “right out of central casting.” Eich: Too modest?

Netscape’s chairman was James H. Clark, a founder of who in 1994 was looking for the next big thing. He seeded Netscape with $5 million and, as I note in 1995, “infused the company with a certain ardor.” Clark recruited James Barksdale, a Mississippi native, from McCaw Cellular Communications to be Netscape’s chief executive. Barksdale was modest, gentlemanly, and “as mellow as shoofly pie,” one technology writer said.

Netscape’s defining and most colorful figure was its co-founder, , a young technologist with an agile mind who talked persuasively and fast. He was, Newsweek magazine declared at the end of 1995, “the uber-super-wunder whiz kid of cyberspace.”

Andreessen was a big guy, standing 6 feet 4. He was 24-years-old in 1995 and was full of amusing quirks and habits. He worked late, got up late. His taste in clothes, it was said, ran to “frat-party ready.”

But Andreessen and Netscape’s stable of young programmers helped define the swagger and flamboyance of the early Web.

They relished poking at the lumbering giant that was , and projected an aura that almost anything was possible online. Suggesting as much was Netscape’s eye-popping IPO — its initial public offering of shares — on August 9, 1995. At the time, the company was not quite 16-months-old and hadn’t come close to turning a profit.

Netscape’s share price opened at $71 on the day of the IPO and climbed to $74.75 before closing at $58.25 — a smashing debut by any measure. The Wall Street Journal observed that it had taken General Dynamics 43 years to become a corporation worth $2.7 billion in the stock market; it had taken Netscape “about a minute.”

Netscape’s IPO had the effect of suddenly demonstrating that the Web was a place of great potential, where riches were waiting to be made.

The IPO, moreover, called aention to the Web for millions of people who in 1995 were only vaguely aware of the Internet: It brought the Web into popular consciousness. As Wired magazine recalled in 2005: “The brilliant flash [of Netscape’s IPO] revealed what had been invisible only a moment before: the .”

Reports about the IPO made the front page the following day in many newspapers, including (see left). But the Mercury News gave top billing not to Netscape but to news the death of Jerry Garcia, the Grateful Dead’s co-founder and front man.

If Netscape’s browser opened the Web to millions of users, the company’s ill-fated struggle with Microsoft seemed to illustrate the risks that upstarts faced in taking on entrenched entities that were powerful, formidable, and very rich. Within three years of the IPO, Microsoft’s had become the Web’s most popular browser, fully erasing Netscape’s once-dominant market share. The “writing was on the wall,” Eich was quoted as saying 10 years later. “Microsoft was driving their monster truck after us and they were about to pin us to the wall.”

And that Microsoft did.

Netscape’s stunning run as the flamboyant startup of reached an inglorious end in November 1998, when Barksdale announced that America Online was acquiring the company in a stock deal worth more than $4 billion. The once- cocksure Netscape was thus reduced to a forlorn and ultimately forgoen outpost of AOL. Netscape’s IPO — and Jerry Garcia’s death The compressed arc of Netscape’s rise and fall was stunning, and emblematic of “Internet time,” a phrase and a notion popular in the late 1990s that everything moved faster online. And yet it was, as technology writer Brian McCullough correctly noted a few months ago, “the first Internet startup that maered.”

WJC

More from The 1995 blog:

Recalling the ‘coolness’ of the early Web Anniversaries, controversies for .com What did the ’90s mean? The ’90s deserve beer Why 1995? Talking 1995 Welcome to The 1995 blog

42 comments on “How important was Netscape?”

Pingback: Illuminating the Web: Netscape’s IPO of August 1995 |

Pingback: Lesson misunderstood: NATO’s 1995 bombing in Bosnia |

Pingback: Hype and hoopla in a watershed year: Launching |

Pingback: So. Africa case like the O.J. Simpson trial in 1995? Only marginally |

Pingback: Recalling the ’95 case against lecherous Bob Packwood, whom Biden praised yesterday |

Pingback: The inevitablity of O.J. Simpson’s acquial in 1995 |

Pingback: The big gap in Monica Lewinsky’s speech | Pingback: It’s out: ’1995: The Year the Future Began’ |

Pingback: Looking back to 1995, the year the future began | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: Quirkiness on New Year’s, 1995: ‘Far Side’ farewell, errant Clinton prediction | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: Rolling out 1995 | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: Media fail: A 1995 subtext that’s familiar today | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: Watershed status of 1995 explored in book rollout at Newseum | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: Going ‘Majic’ for a brisk radio discussion about 1995 | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: ‘1995 was watershed moment in consumer technology,’ says Intel CEO | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: What ‘Time’ forgot in its look back to 1995 | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: 20 years on: Recalling O.J.’s wretched bestseller | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: Part One: Highlights of ‘1995’ interview with Reason.com | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: Part Two: Interview takes up scandal and the ’90s ‘zeitgeist’ | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: ‘Calvin and Hobbes’ was best ended in 1995 | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: Talking Internet history, and 1995 | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: Saluting the unassuming wiki, 20 years after its launch | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: Terror in the heartland: Oklahoma City, April 1995 | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: Media fail: The flawed early coverage of 1995 OKC bombing | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: Closing off Pennsylvania Ave.: 1995 and a psychology of fear | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: ‘The Internet Tidal Wave,’ 20 years on | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: Downed pilot eludes Serbs: When Americans took notice of Bosnia | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: Microsoft warns Netscape in prelude to the ‘browser war’ of 1995-98 | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: 1995 as tipping point: Recalling Smith Corona’s bankruptcy | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: The ‘Netscape Moment,’ 20 years on | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: Dilemma on the Merc’s front page: Lead with Netscape? Jerry Garcia death? | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: Once-dominant and much-loathed, IE turns 20 | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: Contrived ballyhoo: Recalling Microsoft’s rollout of Windows 95 | The 1995 Blog Pingback: (1994) | IT Remembered

Pingback: Prediction of the year, 1995: Internet ‘will soon go spectacularly supernova’ | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: Remembering launch of Alta Vista, ‘a high-speed system for finding information’ on early Web | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: Christmas and cyberspace, 1995: Toe-dipping online | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: Looking back at a watershed year: 1995 in blog posts | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: The ‘Netscape Moment,’ 21 years on | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: PBS doc on OKC bombing signals anew the significance of 1995 | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: CNN series gives kitchen-sink treatment to the ’90s | The 1995 Blog

Pingback: When the Web was new: Remembering Netscape and its fall | The 1995 Blog

Comments are closed.

This entry was posted on July 21, 2014 by W. Joseph Campbell in 1990s, Anniversaries, Internet, Netscape, Watershed year, World Wide Web and tagged 1995, Browser war, Early Web, Internet, Netscape, Startup, Watershed year. hps://wp.me/p4HZIe-3N Previous post Next post Blog at WordPress.com.