DOCSLIB.ORG

Pupilija Papa Pupilo Pa Pupilčki

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pupilija Papa Pupilo Pa Pupilčki ISSN 0351-1189 PRIMERJALNA KNJIŽEVNOST ISSN 0351-1189 Literatura in cenzura Comparative literature, Ljubljana PKn (Ljubljana) 31.2 (2008) 31.2 PKn (Ljubljana) Kdo se boji resnice literature? PKn (Ljubljana) 31. Posebna številka / Special Issue (2008) Izdaja Slovensko društvo za primerjalno književnost Literature and Censorship Published by the Slovene Comparative Literature Association www.zrc-sazu.si/sdpk/revija.htm Who is Afraid of the Truth of Literature? Glavna in odgovorna urednica Editor: Darja Pavlič Uredil Marijan Dović Uredniški odbor Editorial Board: Edited by Darko Dolinar, Marko Juvan, Lado Kralj, Vid Snoj, Jola Škulj Uredniški svet Advisory Board: Vladimir Biti (Zagreb), Erika Greber (München/Munich), Janko Kos, Aleksander Skaza, Neva Šlibar, Galin Tihanov (Manchester), Ivan Verč (Trst/Trieste), Tomo Virk, Peter V. Zima (Celovec/Klagenfurt) © avtorji © Authors PKn izhaja trikrat na leto PKn is published three times a year. Prispevke in naročila pošiljajte na naslov Send manuscripts and orders to: številka / Special Issue (2008) Posebna 31. PKn (Ljubljana) Revija Primerjalna književnost, FF, Aškerčeva 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia. Letna naročnina: 17,50 €, za študente in dijake 8,80 €. TR 02010-0016827526, z oznako »za revijo«. Cena posamezne številke: 6,30 €. Annual subscription/single issues (outside Slovenia): € 35/€ 12.60. Naklada Copies: 400. PKn je vključena v PKn is indexed/ abstracted in: Arts & Humanities Citation Index, Current Contents/ A&H, Bibliographie d'histoire littéraire française, IBZ and IBR, MLA Directory of Periodicals, MLA International Bibliography, Ulrich's International Periodicals Directory. Oblikovanje Design: Narvika Bovcon Stavek in prelom Typesetting: Alenka Maček Tisk Printed by: VB&S d. o. o., Milana Majcna 4, Ljubljana Revija izhaja s podporo Javne agencije za raziskovalno dejavnost ter Ministrstva za kulturo RS. The journal is supported by the Slovenian Research Agency and Ministry of Culture. Oddano v tisk 11. avgusta 2008 Sent to print 11 August 2008 PREDGOVOR FOREWORD 1 Marijan Dović: Literatura in cenzura, resnica in strah 159 Marijan Dović: Literature and Censorship, Truth and Fear I. TEORIJA I. THEORY 9 Marijan Dović: Totalitarna in post-totalitarna cenzura: od trde k mehki? 167 Marijan Dović:: Totalitarian and Post-totalitarian Censorship: From Hard to Soft? 21 Stephan Packard:vModel tekstualnega nadzora: zavajajoče predstavljanje cenzure 179 Stephan Packard: A Model of Textual Control: Misrepresenting Censorship 33 Rok Svetlič: Cenzurni krivdorek kot mesto zloma pozitivističnega 191 Rok Svetlič:: Judicial Censorship as a Place for the Breakdown of Positivist pravnega diskurza Jurisprudential Discourse II. KONTROVERZE TOTALITARNE CENZURE II. CONTROVERSIES OF TOTALITARIAN CENSORSHIP 43 Guido Bonsaver: Mussolinijev fašizem, literarna cenzura in Vatikan 201 Guido Bonsaver: Mussolini‘s Fascism, Literary Censorship, and the Vatican 55 Salah Salim Ali: Ideologija, cenzura in literatura: Irak kot študija 213 Salah Salim Ali: Ideology, Censorship, and Literature: Iraq as a Case Study primera 221 Aleš Gabrič:: Censorship in Slovenia after World War II: From the Communist 63 Aleš Gabrič: Cenzura v Sloveniji po drugi svetovni vojni: od Index Librorum Prohibitorum to Abolition of the “Verbal Offence” komunističnega Index librorum prohibitorum do ukinitve »verbalnega 237 J Aleksandra Jovićević: Censorship and Ingenious Dramatic Strategies in delikta« Yugoslav Theatre (1945–1991) 79 Aleksandra Jovićević: Cenzura in dramske strategije v jugoslovanskem gledališču (1945–1991) III. POST-TOTALITARIAN CENSORSHIP III. POST-TOTALITARNA CENZURA 251 Gašper Troha: Communist and Democratic Censorship in Slovenia: The Case of Pupilija papa Pupilo pa Pupilčki 95 Gašper Troha: Socialistična in demokratična cenzura v Sloveniji: primer predstave Pupilija papa Pupilo pa Pupilčki 259 Andrej Zavrl: Undressing Literary History: The Censorship of Same-Sex Desire 103 Andrej Zavrl: Slačenje literarne zgodovine: cenzura istospolne želje 271 Peter Dunwoodie: Untimely Rewriting: Memory and Self-Censorship in 115 Peter Dunwoodie: Nepravočasno vnovično pisanje: spomin in Camus’ Le Premier homme samocenzura v Camusevem Prvem človeku 283 Louise L. Lambrichs: Talking about Censorship Supposes Being Precise about 125 Louise L. Lambrichs: Govor o cenzuri zahteva natančnost glede njenega What Is Supposed to Be Censored: The Handke Affair as a Case Study domnevnega predmeta: primer afere Handke 295 Simona Škrabec: Words in Freedom 137 Simona Škrabec: Svobodne besede CONVICTED WRITERS OBSOJENA PISATELJA 309 Matjaž Pikalo: Who‘s Afraid of the Truth of Literature? 149 Matjaž Pikalo: Kdo se boji resnice literature? 313 Breda Smolnikar: A Dream Napkin White as Snow on the Basket of Slovenian 151 Breda Smolnikar: Sanjski snežno beli prtič na košari slovenske literature Literature O AVTORJIH ABOUT THE AUTHORS PREDGOVOR FOREWORD 1 Marijan Dović: Literatura in cenzura, resnica in strah 159 Marijan Dović: Literature and Censorship, Truth and Fear I. TEORIJA I. THEORY 9 Marijan Dović: Totalitarna in post-totalitarna cenzura: od trde k mehki? 167 Marijan Dović:: Totalitarian and Post-totalitarian Censorship: From Hard to Soft? 21 Stephan Packard:vModel tekstualnega nadzora: zavajajoče predstavljanje cenzure Literatura179 Stephan Packard: in cenzura A Model of Textual Control: Misrepresenting Censorship 33 Rok Svetlič: Cenzurni krivdorek kot mesto zloma pozitivističnega Kdo191 se bojiRok Svetlič:: resnice Judicial Censorshipliterature? as a Place for the Breakdown of Positivist pravnega diskurza Jurisprudential Discourse Uredil Marijan Dović II. KONTROVERZE TOTALITARNE CENZURE II. CONTROVERSIES OF TOTALITARIAN CENSORSHIP 43 Guido Bonsaver: Mussolinijev fašizem, literarna cenzura in Vatikan 201 Guido Bonsaver: Mussolini‘s Fascism, Literary Censorship, and the Vatican 55 Salah Salim Ali: Ideologija, cenzura in literatura: Irak kot študija 213 Salah Salim Ali: Ideology, Censorship, and Literature: Iraq as a Case Study primera 221 Aleš Gabrič:: Censorship in Slovenia after World War II: From the Communist 63 Aleš Gabrič: Cenzura v Sloveniji po drugi svetovni vojni: od Index Librorum Prohibitorum to Abolition of the “Verbal Offence” komunističnega Index librorum prohibitorum do ukinitve »verbalnega 237 J Aleksandra Jovićević: Censorship and Ingenious Dramatic Strategies in delikta« Yugoslav Theatre (1945–1991) 79 Aleksandra Jovićević: Cenzura in dramske strategije v jugoslovanskem gledališču (1945–1991) III. POST-TOTALITARIAN CENSORSHIP III. POST-TOTALITARNA CENZURA 251 Gašper Troha: Communist and Democratic Censorship in Slovenia: The Case of Pupilija papa Pupilo pa Pupilčki 95 Gašper Troha: Socialistična in demokratična cenzura v Sloveniji: primer predstave Pupilija papa Pupilo pa Pupilčki 259 Andrej Zavrl: Undressing Literary History: The Censorship of Same-Sex Desire 103 Andrej Zavrl: Slačenje literarne zgodovine: cenzura istospolne želje 271 Peter Dunwoodie: Untimely Rewriting: Memory and Self-Censorship in 115 Peter Dunwoodie: Nepravočasno vnovično pisanje: spomin in Camus’ Le Premier homme samocenzura v Camusevem Prvem človeku 283 Louise L. Lambrichs: Talking about Censorship Supposes Being Precise about 125 Louise L. Lambrichs: Govor o cenzuri zahteva natančnost glede njenega What Is Supposed to Be Censored: The Handke Affair as a Case Study domnevnega predmeta: primer afere Handke 295 Simona Škrabec: Words in Freedom 137 Simona Škrabec: Svobodne besede CONVICTED WRITERS OBSOJENA PISATELJA 309 Matjaž Pikalo: Who‘s Afraid of the Truth of Literature? 149 Matjaž Pikalo: Kdo se boji resnice literature? 313 Breda Smolnikar: A Dream Napkin White as Snow on the Basket of Slovenian 151 Breda Smolnikar: Sanjski snežno beli prtič na košari slovenske literature Literature O AVTORJIH PrimerjalnaABOUT THE književnost, AUTHORS Letnik 31, Posebna številka, Ljubljana, avgust 2008, UDK 82.091(05) Literatura in cenzura, resnica in strah Marijan Dović UDK 82:351.751.5 82:317.7 Izbira teme za letošnjo posebno številko Primerjalne književnosti še malo ni naključna. Čeprav se na prvi pogled utegne zdeti kot odziv na slovenske polemike o medijski cenzuri v zadnjih letih,1 so vzroki zanjo v resnici bolj daljnosežni. Sploh zato, ker v naši postavitvi problema cenzuri enakovre- dno mesto zavzema literatura, pa tudi zato, ker vprašujoči podnaslov Kdo se boji resnice literature? ni nujno zavezan odkrivanju nekega konkretnega cenzorskega subjekta, ki bi od zunaj ogrožal literarno avtonomijo, tem- več (po tihem) sprašuje tudi, ali je literaturi sploh mogoče kar na počez pripisovati tak emancipatorični, etični naboj, ki ga evocira pojem resnica. Ravno zato je treba naslov in podnaslov pojasniti natančneje. Skušali se jima bomo približati s pomočjo dveh temeljnih motivov, ki stojita v ozad- ju te izbire. Oba sta obarvana lokalno, a kot bomo videli, imata širše implikacije. Prvi je spoznanje, da smo globoko zaznamovani s cenzurirano preteklostjo. Novejša odkritja o slovenski (jugoslovanski) kulturni zgodovini v drugi polovici 20. stoletja so pokazala, da smo živeli v skrbno očiščenem svetu z odmerjenimi dozami svobode, ki so ga obvladovali mehanizmi vlada- joče komunistične ideologije, in da so številna dejstva ostajala načrtno in sistematično potlačena in izrinjena. Živeli smo v cenzurirani kulturi, ki ni poznala uradne cenzure, a so v njej – kljub navideznim liberalizacijam – nečloveški poboji desettisočev ljudi, montirani »dachavski« procesi, Goli otok, nasilje nad drugače mislečimi in drugi zločini oblasti ostajali prikriti oziroma neizgovorljivi dolga
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Translation and Manipulation
    5785 Forough Rahimi et al./ Elixir Ling. & Trans. 41 (2011) 5785-5790 Available online at www.elixirpublishers.com (Elixir International Journal) Linguistics and Translation Elixir Ling. & Trans. 41 (2011) 5785-5790 Translation and manipulation: a critical discourse analysis case study Forough Rahimi and Mohammad Javad Riasati Department of Foreign Languages, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran. ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: This paper seeks to delineate the constraints imposed on translators of movie dialogues in Received: 20 September 2011; the context of Iran. The movie ''Platoon'' is selected for this purpose. In this situation a Received in revised form: myriad of external constraints, that is, cultural, religious, and political, lead to rewriting or 16 November 2011; manipulation of movie texts. This is an effective means for creating and naturalizing Accepted: 28 November 2011; ideologies, through expurgation, derogation, etc. The movie translations in Iran are scenes of ideological incursions in translation, that is, suppression of dialectal features. They are sites Keywords of ideological clashes in which certain realities are constructed and challenged and Translation, xenophobic attitudes are propagated. The translators counterfeit realities and inculcate them Censorship, in the innocent audience. This paper explores the ideological and socio-political factors Ideological manipulation. which determine the strategies applied in the translation of western movies. © 2011 Elixir All rights reserved. Introduction language is an irreducible part of social life. The dialectic During the past decade educational researchers increasingly relation between language and social reality is realized through have turned to Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) as a set of social events (texts), social practices (orders of discourse) and approaches to answer questions about the relationships between social structures (languages) [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Faith and Literature: a Look at Book Censorship
    Ouachita Baptist University Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita Honors Theses Carl Goodson Honors Program 2009 Faith and Literature: A Look at Book Censorship Laura Cox Ouachita Baptist University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/honors_theses Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Information Literacy Commons Recommended Citation Cox, Laura, "Faith and Literature: A Look at Book Censorship" (2009). Honors Theses. 238. https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/honors_theses/238 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Carl Goodson Honors Program at Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 INTRO For centuries, society has debated the issue of book censorship. Before Johannes Gutenberg introduced the printing press in 1455, the burning ofhand-scribed books destroyed limited copies and guaranteed they would not be read. With the printing press, books could be produced in greater numbers; yet, printed speech was still a commodity that could be controlled. In 1517, Pope Leo X condemned Martin Luther's Ninety Five Theses, an early example of religious censorship of materials deemed dangerous or subversive. Political censorship quickly followed when Emperor Charles V issued the Edict ofWorms, containing a "Law ofPrinting" which banned the printing, copying, sale, or reading of Luther's writings (Foerstel xi). Beginning in 1564, the Catholic papacy promulgated its Index Librorum Prohibitorum (Index of Prohibited Books). Compiled by the Holy Inquisition in Rome, the Index listed the books and authors Catholics were prohibited from printing or reading.
    [Show full text]
  • Censorship!Censorship!
    CENSORSHIP!CENSORSHIP! LDF BANNED CB K HAN BOO EE FiGhT fOr tHeD B K W FrEeDoM tO rEaD! OOK S STAFF DIRECTOR’S NOTE Charles Brownstein, Executive Director Alex Cox, Deputy Director Samantha Johns, Development Manager Happy Banned Books Week! Every year, communities come together in Kate Jones, Office Manager this national celebration of the freedom to read! This year, Banned Books Betsy Gomez, Editorial Director Maren Williams, Contributing Editor Week spotlights young adult books, which is by far the category most Caitlin McCabe, Contributing Editor commonly targeted for censorship. Stand up for the right to read for all Robert Corn-Revere, Legal Counsel readers by becoming a part of the Banned Books Week celebration that will take place September 27 through October 3, 2015! BOARD OF DIRECTORS Larry Marder, President Milton Griepp, Vice President Launched in 1982 to draw attention to the problem of book censorship Jeff Abraham, Treasurer in the United States, Banned Books Week is held during the last week of Dale Cendali, Secretary Jennifer L. Holm September. By being a part of it, you can make a difference in protecting Reginald Hudlin the freedom to read! Katherine Keller Paul Levitz In this handbook, Comic Book Legal Defense Fund provides you with Christina Merkler Chris Powell all the tools you need to prepare your Banned Books Week celebration. Jeff Smith We’ll talk about how books are banned, show you some specific cases ADVISORY BOARD in which comics were challenged, and provide you with hands on tips to Neil Gaiman & Denis Kitchen, Co-Chairs celebrate Banned Books Week in your community.
    [Show full text]
  • Libraries, Censors, and Self-Censorship
    PBCore (PBCore Public Broadcasting Metadata Dictionary Project). (2005). Background of the PBCore Public Broadcasting Metadata Dictionary Project. Available: http://www.pbcore.org/PBCore/PBCore_background.html PBCore (PBCore Public Broadcasting Metadata Dictionary Project) (December, 2008). Announcements and news about the PBCore Public Broadcasting Metadata Dictionary: PBCore v1.2 is on the Horizon!!! Available: http://www.pbcore.org/announcements.html#pbcore1-2soon Smith, J.R. (2002). MPEG-7 Industry Use v.2.0 [Electronic version]. International Organization for Standardization/ Organization Internationale Normalisation ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29/WG 11/ Coding of Moving Pictures and Audio, 3-4. Zhang, Y., & Li. Y. (2008). A User-Centered Functional Metadata Evaluation of Moving Image Collections. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59: 1331-1346. Libraries, Censors, and Self-Censorship CORA MCANDREWS MOELLENDICK Cora McAndrews Moellendick has been teaching for eleven years and currently works for the Department of Defense School system, teaching at Zama American Middle School in Japan. She has Bachelors of Science in Education with a Mathematics Specialization from the University of Texas at Austin and a Masters of Arts in Educational Technology from Michigan State University. She is currently taking Independent Study classes through the University of Idaho in Library Science and hopes to obtain her MLS in the future. She and her husband of five years are expecting their first child in December and love teaching overseas. She can be reached at: [email protected] Introduction Censorship is a concept that has a close association with libraries. A Google search of the two words resulted in 1,260,000 hits as of June 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • An Exploration of Pre-Censorship of Children’S Books: Perceptions and Experiences of Canadian Authors and Illustrators
    AN EXPLORATION OF PRE-CENSORSHIP OF CHILDREN’S BOOKS: PERCEPTIONS AND EXPERIENCES OF CANADIAN AUTHORS AND ILLUSTRATORS by CHERIE LYNN GIVENS A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Library, Archival and Information Studies) THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Vancouver) September 2009 © Cherie Lynn Givens, 2009 Abstract There is little documentation of pre-censorship of children’s literature. The discussion of pre-censorship is often submerged within more general censorship discussions and not specifically identified. It is addressed in snippets of information revealed in interviews and responses to questionnaires concerning censorship. This study was designed to examine in detail the phenomenon of pre-censorship as experienced by Canadian children’s and young adult authors and illustrators. A qualitative, naturalistic methodology was selected to explore participants’ experiences through in-depth interviews with open-ended questions designed to encourage participants to speak at length and share thoughts, feelings, and insights. Seventeen Canadian authors and illustrators, who self-identified as having experienced pre-censorship, participated in this study. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with all but one of the participants, whose interview was conducted by telephone and a follow-up in-person meeting. Most participants requested confidentiality, wishing to keep their names and the titles of the books undisclosed. Participants provided concrete examples of how pre-censorship was experienced by authors and illustrators. Types of pre-censorship were identified. Reasons given for pre- censorship make clear that marketing and sales concerns as well as a fear of censorship after publication are dominant motivating factors.
    [Show full text]
  • "Censorship from Rulers, Censorship from Book Piracy: the Strategies Of
    Laursen, John Christian. "Censorship from Rulers, Censorship from Book Piracy: The Strategies of Immanuel Kant." Censorship Moments: Reading Texts in the History of Censorship and Freedom of Expression. Ed. Geoff Kemp. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2015. 103–108. Textual Moments in the History of Political Thought. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 28 Sep. 2021. <http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781472593078.ch-014>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 28 September 2021, 23:38 UTC. Copyright © Geoff Kemp and contributors 2015. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 13 Censorship from Rulers, Censorship from Book Piracy: The Strategies of Immanuel Kant John Christian Laursen I have placed the main point of enlightenment – mankind’s exit from its self- imposed immaturity – primarily on religious matters since our rulers have no interest in playing the role of guardian to their subjects with regard to the arts and sciences and because this type of immaturity is the most harmful as well as the most dishonourable. But the manner of thinking of a head of state who favours such enlightenment goes even further and sees that even with regard to his own legislation there is no danger in allowing his subjects to make public use of their reason and to lay publicly before the world their thoughts about a better formulation of this legislation as well as a candid criticism of laws already given. We have a shining example of this, in which no monarch has yet surpassed the one we honour.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Butcher Shop to the Peaceful Pill: a History of Book Censorship in New Zealand
    From The Butcher Shop to The Peaceful Pill: A history of book censorship in New Zealand. - Paper presented at the LIANZA 2010 Conference in November 2010. The media which our society produces and consumes has always been cause for debate about the effects, positive or negative (though more often than not focussing on the negative), on its audience. From the influence of the written word on perceptions of religion and politics, to the concerns over films chipping away at society‟s moral fibre, to the debates over whether video games make people violent – the media, who accesses it and who stops them has been a constantly evolving and ongoing story both in New Zealand and around the world. Today, I‟m going to share a chapter of that story with you by looking at how censorship in New Zealand has evolved over the last 100 years or so. We‟ll look at the sort of content that has been subject to censorship, the various systems and bodies that have been created over the years to deal with this, and how the issue of book censorship has fitted into the broader story of censorship in New Zealand. I should begin by saying that we don‟t have a lot of information about the censorship of non- film publications prior to the creation of the Indecent Publications Tribunal in 1963. The main reason for this is that prior to 1963 book censorship was not the primary function of any organisation – instead it was the responsibility of New Zealand Customs operating under the Indecent Publications Act of 1910.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Censorship in Nigeria: a Study of Origin, Methods and Motivations, 1805-2018 EMMANUEL IFEDUBA [email protected]
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 7-31-2018 Book Censorship in Nigeria: A study of Origin, Methods and Motivations, 1805-2018 EMMANUEL IFEDUBA [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, and the Library and Information Science Commons IFEDUBA, EMMANUEL, "Book Censorship in Nigeria: A study of Origin, Methods and Motivations, 1805-2018" (2018). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 1954. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1954 Book Censorship in Nigeria: A study of Origin, Methods and Motivations, 1805-2018 By Emmanuel Ifeduba Redeemer’s University, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria Email: [email protected] Phone: 234 803821430 Abstract Twenty-first century Nigeria may be described as the era of democracy yet freedom to publish, which is one of the hallmarks of true democracy, seem to be endangered more than ever before. Conversation around this subject has, however, been superficial, lacking in both historical and empirical depth. The aim of this study, therefore, is to investigate the origin, methods and motivations of censorship in Nigeria with a view to deepening the understanding of this phenomenon. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected offline and online using document analysis and interviews were analysed by simple percentages and the constant comparative method. Findings indicate that book censorship began in 1805, over two centuries ago. Eleven methods, including, burning, banning and bombing have been employed and three major motivations (political, religious and socio-cultural) were identified.
    [Show full text]
  • (Censorship) in Iran
    TextScreening(Censorship)inIran:A Historical Perspective HusseinMollanazar AllamehTabataba’iUniversity,Iran [email protected] Abstract Censorshiphasa longhistoryinIranthathasinterferedwithtextproduction, i.e., original writing as well as translation. This phenomenon seems to have marked the borderline between the government and the ‘enlightened’ intellectuals throughout history in Iran. Different governments have delineated ‘redlines’ for authors and translators and dealt with these constructorsofculturebasedonthedefinitionstheysetforthose‘redlines’. Thishistoricalresearchaimsatexploringandfindingoutthefeaturesofthese ‘redlines’aswellasthemechanismsandrulesoftextscreening(censorship) throughoutIran’smodernerasincetheimportingoftheprintingpress. Keywords: Censorship, Self-censorship, Bowdlerization, Text Screening, Mobtazal,Moh/reb,Z/lleh,Sanctities,SensitiveTexts,Taboos Received:January2010; Accepted:December2010 IranianJournalofAppliedLanguageStudies,Vol3,No2,2011 1. Introduction InanarticlepublishedintheEconomist, ananonymousauthorwrites, TwodecadesafterthefatwawasimposedonMrRushdie,itappearsthat manyWesternartists,publishersandgovernmentsaremorewillingtoday tosacrificesomeoftheirfreedomofspeechthanwasthecasein1989.To manycriticsthatwillbeseenasself-censorshipthathasgonetoofar.Buta difficultbalancemustbestruck:nocountrypermitscompletelyfreespeech. Typically,itislimitedbyprohibitionsagainstlibel,defamation,obscenity, judicialorparliamentaryprivilegeandthelike.Protectingfreeexpression willoftenrequirehurtingthefeelingsofindividualsorgroups;equallythe
    [Show full text]
  • Pelintiran Kebencian
    Pelintiran Rekayasa Kebencian Ketersinggungan Agama dan Ancamannya bagi Demokrasi Cherian George Pelintiran Kebencian Pelintiran Kebencian Rekayasa Ketersinggungan Agama dan Ancamannya bagi Demokrasi Cherian George Pusat Studi Agama dan Demokrasi (PUSAD) Yayasan Paramadina Jakarta, 2017 Pelintiran Kebencian Rekayasa Ketersinggungan Agama dan Ancamannya bagi Demokrasi Karya Cherian George © 2016 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Penerjemah: Tim PUSAD Paramadina dan IIS UGM Penyunting: Ihsan Ali-Fauzi dan Irsyad Rafsadie Cetakan I, Desember 2017 Diterbitkan oleh Pusat Studi Agama dan Demokrasi (PUSAD) Yayasan Paramadina bekerjasama dengan Institute of International Studies (IIS) Jurusan Ilmu Hubungan Internasional Universitas Gadjah Mada didukung oleh The Asia Foundation Alamat Penerbit: Bona Indah Plaza Blok A2 No B11 Jl. Karang Tengah Raya, Lebak Bulus, Cilandak Jakarta Selatan 12440 Tel. (021) 765 5253 Perpustakaan Nasional: Katalog Dalam Terbitan (KDT) Cherian George Pelintiran Kebencian: Rekayasa Ketersinggungan Agama dan Ancamannya bagi Demokrasi/Cherian George; penyunting, Ihsan Ali- Fauzi dan Irsyad Rafsadie. —Jakarta: PUSAD Paramadina, 2017. x + 370 h.; 15,5 x 23 cm. ISBN 978-979-772-058-2 Subjek: Penodaan agama—Hukum dan perundangan | Penodaan agama—Aspek politik. | Kebebasan berekspresi. | Persekusi politik. | Ujaran kebencian—Hukum dan perundangan Mengenang Ibrahim Haji Kader Mustan (1925-1976) dan Samsu Rizal Panggabean (1961-2017) Daftar Isi Pengantar Penerbit iii Prakata v Ucapan Terima Kasih ix 1 Pelintiran Kebencian
    [Show full text]
  • Point: Book Censorship Is an Attack on the Freedom of the Press
    Point: Book Censorship is an Attack on the Freedom of the Press. Thesis: The First Amendment, basically, grants American citizens the right to access, publish, or broadcast any content as long as it does not infringe upon the rights or safety of others. The right to a free press is threatened by censorship of existing media and by prevention of the publication or broadcast of certain content. Summary: Censorship of books and other publications is the most significant threat to modern media. Organizations and individuals continue to call for the censorship of books, websites, magazines and newspapers on the basis of "obscenity" or "maintaining public order." Though state and local governments have created numerous censorship guidelines, the Supreme Court has routinely upheld the right of free choice for adult consumers. The situation is markedly different in foreign countries, particularly China, which employs sophisticated internet filtering technology to keep its citizens from accessing a free range of information. During times of crisis, challenges to freedom of expression become more pronounced. It is not unusual for governments to attempt to thwart subversion and dissent by restricting the exchange of information between citizens. Libel (a civil, and in some countries, a criminal, action seeking to punish false or defamatory publications) and prior restraint (a doctrine permitting government to take action against errant speech before it is published) have been used, historically, to prevent the press from effectively monitoring the activities of government and interest groups. A series of landmark cases has validated the rights of the press to inform the public on political issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Censorship on Visual Arts and Its Political
    CENSORSHIP ON VISUAL ARTS AND ITS POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS IN CONTEMPORARY TURKEY: FOUR CASE STUDIES FROM 2002 – 2009 by ÖZDEN ŞAHĐN Submitted to the Graduate School of Arts and Social Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Sabancı University Spring 2009 ii © Özden Şahin 2009 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT CENSORSHIP ON VISUAL ARTS AND ITS POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS IN CONTEMPORARY TURKEY: FOUR CASE STUDIES FROM 2002 – 2009 Özden Şahin Cultural Studies, MA Thesis, 2009 Dissertation Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Lanfranco Aceti Keywords: Censorship, Visual Arts, Turkey, Kemalism, Political Islam. Debates on art censorship often have proved to offer a fertile ground for research on the issues of art, autonomy and freedom. Through an analysis of four case studies, this study aims to offer an analytical survey on censorship on visual arts in Đstanbul from the recent historical context of 2002 – 2009, during the rule of recent Adalet ve Kalkinma Partisi (AKP – Justice and Development Party) government. The selected cases are situated within the framework of modernization, political Islam and Kemalism and are analysed as cultural expressions of the contemporary Turkish political scene. The cases are selected according to the variety and the possibilities offered by the censorship mechanisms as well as the positioning of the artists within the processes. Interviews with the artists discuss (a) the norms of censorship; (b) the engagements of the artists within the processes; (c) self-censorship; (d) the censors’ justifications for each case. The research suggests that although recent censorship on visual arts in Turkey always reflects a specific socio-cultural context, the general formulation of censorship has its roots in moral justifications, in both political Islam and the state nationalism, as a response directed against the representators of any kind of perceived oppositon in its political and social sense.
    [Show full text]