Censorship and the Teaching of English. INSTITUTION Arizona English Teachers Association, Tempe
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 109 698 CS 202 190 AUTHO? Donelson, Ken, Fl. TITLE Censorship and the Teaching of English. INSTITUTION Arizona English Teachers Association, Tempe. PUB DATF Feb 75 NOTE 270p. AVAILABLE FFOM National Council of Teachers of English, 1111 Kenyon Road, Illinois 61801(Stock No. 05203, $5.50 nonmember, $4.75 member) JOUFNAL CIT Arizona English Bulletin; v17 n2 Entire Issue February 1975 EDRS PRICE MF-$0.76 HC-$13.32 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS *Academic Freedom; *Censorship; Civil Liberties; Elementary Secondary Education; *English Instruction; Freedom of Speech; Racism; School Environment; Student Rights ABSTPACT Ideas, facts, and techniques about censorship and fighting censorship are the subjects of the articles in this extensive issue. Some of the topics discussed are censorship in other states, censorship in the elementary school, rational censorship, racism and censorship, the North Dakota book-burning incident, student rights in high school journalism, a publisher's attitudes toward censorship, .film censorship, the role of the school boardin protecting students' and schools' rights, the role of studentsin fighting censorship, and the history of censorship. A lengthy bibliography lists scholarly and pedagogical articles and books about censorship. (JM) *********************************************************************** * Documents acquired by ERIC include mary informal unpublished * * * ma*erials not available from other sources. ERIC makes everyeffort * *to obtain the best copy available.nevertheless, items of marqinal * *reproducibility are often encountered and this affects thequality * *of the microfiche and hardcopy reproductions EPICmakes available * *via thP ? ?IC Document Peproiuction Service (EEPS). EDPSis not * *responsible for the quality of the original document.Reproductions *supplied by EDPS are *he best that can bP made from theoriginal. * *********************************************************************** S OF P A , If _)f- HE Al TH f Dt, ATION, NEt FARE NA TONal N1T1T,TE rn L DUCA T ON CENSORSHIP AND THE TEACHING OF ENGLISH R Volume 17 Number 2 I February 1975 (: 0 ry ENG LISH6ateereit 112ARIZONA ENGLISH BULLETIN EliTAin7 192 H GENS01611IP AND THE TEACHING OF ENGLISH GONTENTS Conser ,nipind En, licit Teaching, 1971-1974 r\OP Arli.0111 '-,tats' University the Cet-eor 'eorhe Leonor Harthly Junior High School, Winkelman 39 Freedom for Reader--; and Other Endangered Species iarriet\kint_osh, i'reedom for Readers, Phoenix 40 f I'd Had L'e t,uts . Fee Rarclav 45 Gen-oi ship in P,z nsy Ivanl Ed,rP Penns\lvania State University 48 ( en, r in the ClassroomCon -ire , Selection, or Both? i;tith Stein, Univerity of Minnesota 49 rho Ciutsor t.t.a',en Williams, by Permie,:ien of Doubleday 53 A Ca-,,e for Censorship T offa, J. ;,lee, Ciff:'en, for Decency Through Lai.:, Inc 54 Gen=,orship, Sexism and 'tactsm John ,:en, Univer,it or Wi,,consin 59 Cetter-hip in Ludtand Richard notuitt, Emmerich Manual High School, Indianapolis 63 He- to Stack Pire,00d So Teachers anii Rooks Aren't Burned by Censors JIharon Crowlev, %orthern Arizona University k,eorgt, Redman, fenedict College, Columbia, South Carolina 64 Sieeario of Bookburning T,ruce Severv, ianie, North Dat vta 68 (,,le,e1,-,1,L,). A otrference in Kind, Not Degree Denni Rtdeczei, StALP University, Dayton, Ohio 75 Hoyof,tudents Can nelp Educate the Censors Pita anecko, Na.conomet High School, Topsfield, Massachusetts 78 Cpn,or,,hip in ohio Jame E. Da%i=., Onio Universi*-, 80 l'rpteciin the The Sapreme Court and Cansorship Judi to F. Krug and kty.-r L. Yank, Office for Intellectual Freedom, ALA . 81 ,'1,at in 1;lattes Tean Catmull, Enftlish Consultant, Statt)II.voming 85 lhe English leacher Self-Censor P,enald L,,Cente, Ualeyersitv of Connecticut 87 I. (..nsered Teacher as ',capegoat lime'. E. Davis, Ohio University 91 ;iased Irreverent' Censorship in Flagstaff 1;etlia foster, Flagstaff Public Schools 94 Cenrf DoL1,10W, and Legal Arguments; about Censorship and the Nature of Obscenity 98 cele,or,;11p: Publisher's View Leo h. [,neer, Foresman and Company `,taco,PtlydtnUniversity 102 l'attlegreund: ';tate Legislatures `,11 an H. (.lark, Media Coalition, Inc 107 cr 1 Nei, ,papers, and Student nights to Freedom of Thought and Expression `-ar-anno H. Emery, Madison High School, San Diego 110 Censorship and a False Assumption Lucky Jacobs, University of Virginia 117 Censorship and Racism: In Pursuit of a Relationship Albert V. Schwartz, Richmond College, Staten Island, New York 120 You Can't Tell the Players Without a Program: A Case Study in Censorship Robert Stewart, West High School, Phoenix 125 Censorship and the High School Librarian Jerry Mangan, Alhambra High School, Phoenix 127 Censorship in Louisiana Charles Suhor, New Orleans Public Schools 131 Films: Censorship of Education? Ronald E. Sutton, American University, Washington, D.C. 132 School Boards Need Protection, Too: Warren Packer, Kofa High School, Yuma 137 A Student's Right to Write Robert E. Bartman, University of Missour , Columbia 141 Censorship in Kansas Donald C. Stewart, Kansas State University 145 Let's Get on with the Censored Story John Donovan, The Children's Book Council, Inc. 146 Censorship in Kentucky: Kentucky Council of Teachers of English Questionnaire Alfred L. Crabb Jr. and Alice Manchikes, KCTE 152 The Liberal's Liberal: Morris L. Ernst Saundra Harmon, Ironwood School, Washington District, Phoenix 158 Censorship in Virginia Paul Slayton, Mary Washington College, Fredericksburg 163 Censorship: What to Do about It?A Modest Proposal Rollin Douma, Western Michigan University 164 Arguments Against Censorship: Milton and Mill Margaret B. Fleming, University of Arizona 171 Censorship in Utah Jewel J. Bindrup, Utah State Board of Education 175 A State-Minded View of Censorship Edward R. Fagan, The Pennsylvania State University 176 Children's Books That Have Met the Censor M. Jean Greenlaw, University of Georgia 181 A Note on Censorship During the Age of Reason in England Stephen Jones, Arizona State University 184 Censorship in Illinois James Coe, University of Illinois 186 Censorship: Who Wants It? More People Than We Think, Maybe James W. Reith, Scottsdale School District 187 Censorship in Maryland Jean C. Sisk, Coordinator English, Baltimore CountySchools 192 Censorship Cases May Increase Robert F. Hogan, Executive Secretary, NCTE 193 Censorship: T'e English Teacher's Nemesis Ray H. Lawson, Rochester High School, Rochester, Michigan 196 Censorship: The Student's Non-Right to Learn Louis M. Papes, Chagrin Falls High School, Chagrin Falls, Ohio 200 A Brief Chronology of the West Virginia Textbook Crisis 203 Censorship in North Dakota Michael H. Keedy, Director Professional Development, NDEA 212 Exclusion and Invisibility: Chicano Literature Not inTextbooks Raymund A. Pared,..s, University of California, LosAngeles 213 Censorship and Paperbacks: Toward a CommonSense Policy 220 Gloria Steinberg Scott, Bantam Books 222 Current Reading 101, 109, 119, 124, 126, 131, 140,145, Shoptalk. 44, 58, 67, 77, 86, 90, 9i, 97, 163, 170, 219, 221, 263 Preface to the Issue . CENSORSHIP AND THE TEACHING OF ENGLISH ti Well, here it is, the longest issue of the ARIZONA ENGLISH BULLETIN we'veever done, 263'pages crammed full of ideas and facts and technique, aboutcensorship and fighting censorship. The bibliography is the longest we'veever printed and the number of articles beats anything before, and we think it's eminently worth read- ing, all of it. Censorship has always been a hot and worrisome thingfor teachers, particularly English teachers, and when this issue was in its planningstages about a year ago, we knew the topic was worth doing again. Our earlier issue on censor- ship (FebruarY'1969) will seemed worthwhile butdated and the Fargo, North Dakota, mess was very.much in the news, and those two reasons alone made the topic worth do'ng. Since that time the West Virginia textbook situation has beenwith us, and censorship if anything seems to be getting worse and Englishteachers are even more concerned about it. This issue has material from manysources and many states: the survey of our own state and censorship conditions here; brief comments about censorship in several other states; a repot from the Phoenix Freedom forReaders group; two comments by librarians; remarks about censorship in the elementary school;a couple of cases for a rational censorship; two articles about racism and censorship;one article by Bruce Severy who was at the heart (or bowels) of the NorthDakota bookburning and another article reacting to the news about the bookburning;a statement about student rights in high school journalism; an article bya publisher and his attitudes towards censorship; a couple of articles about film censorship;a comment urging English teachers to recruit their students in the battle against censorship;two articles from organizations (ALA and Media Coalition) tightingcensorship; several articles about specific censorship incidents; severalstatements about the English teacher as a censor; an article arguing that school boards need for their own-saketo establish policy guidelines to protect students and educationfrom unwarranted attack; a comment on the student's right to write; specific recommendationsfor schools to follow in preparing for the censor;a warning that censorship cases are likely to increase; an argument that minority literature hasbeen censored by exclusion from textbooks; and several articles about the history of censorship. It is a rich and varied issue despite the fact that