Traffic Statistics 2009

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Traffic Statistics 2009 “Falcone e Borsellino Airport” TRAFFIC STATISTICS JAN-DIC 2009 DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC SCHEDULED AND NON SCHEDULED FLIGHTS A/C MOVEMENTS PASSENGERS PAX per MVT TRAFFIC JAN-DIC 46.780 4.350.563 93,00 % CHG 2008/09 + 3,88% - 1,62% -5,30% SCHEDULED FLIGHTS A/C MOVEMENTS PASSENGERS PAX per MVT TRAFFIC JAN-DIC 45.188 4.161.679 92,10 % CHG 2008/09 + 5,40% -0,42% -5,52% NON SCHEDULED FLIGHTS A/C MOVEMENTS PASSENGERS PAX per MVT TRAFFIC JAN-DIC 1.592 188.884 118,65 % CHG 2008/09 -26,19% -22,19% + 5,43% SCHEDULED AND NON SCHEDULED COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC DOMESTIC FLIGHTS A/C MOVEMENTS PASSENGERS PAX per MVT TRAFFIC JAN-DIC 40.820 3.651.227 89,45 % CHG 2008/09 + 9,63% + 1,83% -7,12% INTERNATIONAL FLIGHTS A/C MOVEMENTS PASSENGERS PAX per MVT TRAFFIC JAN-DIC 5.960 699.336 117,34 % CHG 2008/09 -23,57% - 16,39% + 9,39% Of which INTRA - EU 5.113 633.362 123,87 % CHG 2008/09 - 21,69% - 15,04% + 8,49% Of which EXTRA - EU 847 65.974 77,89 % CHG 2008/09 - 33,25% - 27,46% + 8,69% TOP SCHEDULED AIRLINES AIRLINE PASSENGERS %CHG 2008/09 A/C MOVEMENTS %CHG 2008/09 ALITALIA 821.329 -17,81% 8.133 -11,42% WIND JET 801.916 -4,12% 8.443 10,79% AIR ONE 678.325 -16,46% 8.024 -22,78% EASYJET 484.171 76,31% 3.974 89,33% MERIDIANA 434.992 -2,65% 7.792 26,70% RYANAIR 302.709 59,11% 2.041 63,67% AIR BERLIN 171.845 -11,90% 1.452 -9,36% BLU EXPRESS 163.817 N/S 1.676 N/S VOLARE 65.357 16,79% 659 8,03% TRANSAVIA.COM 41.555 16,99% 290 10,69% VUELING AIRLINES 38.245 59,93% 322 62,63% EUROFLY 33.628 -64,83% 366 -53,90% TUNIS AIR 19.512 -17,63% 414 -13,75% XL AIRWAYS FRANCE 17.069 128,35% 140 141,38% IBERIA 10.488 55,59% 158 75,56% N/S Not Significant TOP NON SCHEDULED AIRLINES AIRLINE PASSENGERS %CHG 2008/09 A/C MOVEMENTS %CHG 2008/09 AIR MEDITERRANEE 55.020 2,74% 299 2,40% EUROPE AIRPOST 32.999 -4,09% 295 -3,91% MISTRAL AIR 25.051 -45,44% 267 -46,81% TRAVEL SERVICE 8.820 N/S 51 N/S CESKOSLOVENSKE AER. 8.179 37,58% 53 32,50% PRIMERA AIR 7.844 N/S 44 N/S TRANSAVIA 7.195 -4,93% 46 -8,00% SEVENAIR 5.739 52,43% 100 63,93% WIND JET 4.556 -63,87% 32 -65,59% VIM AIRLINES 3.310 -61,03% 22 -58,49% DUBROVNIK AIRLINE 2.804 19,12% 22 0,00% JETAIR 2.678 -67,50% 42 -55,32% MALMO AVIATION 2.267 -47,17% 26 -44,68% ITALI AIRLINES 1.887 N/S 33 N/S ALITALIA 1.813 19,59% 23 -11,54% N/S Not Significant TOP DIRECT LINKS WITH DOMESTIC AIRPORTS O.&D.(AIRPORT) PASSENGERS % CHG 2008/09 ROME 1.372.129 9,33% MILAN LIN 491.797 -6,15% MILAN MXP 390.763 -9,09% VENICE 201.360 3,41% PISA 176.825 81,75% BOLOGNA 168.444 -10,03% VERONE 132.906 -12,68% TURIN 131.592 40,23% BERGAMO 119.750 93,56% NAPLES 114.149 -20,05% FORLI' 86.366 -5,74% LAMPEDUSA 79.315 -2,64% PARMA 62.060 -14,02% PANTELLERIA 53.876 -13,42% CAGLIARI 27.296 -0,02% TOP DIRECT LINKS WITH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORTS O.&D.(AIRPORT) PASSENGERS % CHG 2008/09 LONDON STN 92.247 -41,01% PARIS CDG 60.827 -9,75% COLOGNE 60.697 -9,56% STUTTGART 51.028 -5,24% BARCELONA 48.909 25,38% PARIS ORY 41.380 16,49% MUNICH 31.181 -18,27% LONDON LGW 19.570 -5,00% TUNIS 17.923 -16,42% HANNOVER 14.499 -2,93% MEMMINGEN 14.178 N/S BRUSSELS 12.562 N/S NEW YORK 12.198 -29,18% MADRID 10.488 29,79% OSLO 6.769 -0,51% N/S Not Significant COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC - PASSENGERS PER MONTH MONTH PASSENGERS % CHG 2008/09 JANUARY 261.300 -3,76% FEBRUARY 242.972 -3,55% MARCH 300.118 -8,80% APRIL 400.323 10,94% MAY 406.432 -6,64% JUNE 399.155 -4,34% JULY 472.478 1,72% AUGUST 518.746 -0,46% SEPTEMBER 430.046 -1,89% OCTOBER 352.235 -2,25% NOVEMBER 266.788 1,16% DECEMBER 299.970 -2,62%.
Recommended publications
  • Liste-Exploitants-Aeronefs.Pdf
    EN EN EN COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, XXX C(2009) XXX final COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) EN EN COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No xxx/2009 of on the list of aircraft operators which performed an aviation activity listed in Annex I to Directive 2003/87/EC on or after 1 January 2006 specifying the administering Member State for each aircraft operator (Text with EEA relevance) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC1, and in particular Article 18a(3)(a) thereof, Whereas: (1) Directive 2003/87/EC, as amended by Directive 2008/101/EC2, includes aviation activities within the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (hereinafter the "Community scheme"). (2) In order to reduce the administrative burden on aircraft operators, Directive 2003/87/EC provides for one Member State to be responsible for each aircraft operator. Article 18a(1) and (2) of Directive 2003/87/EC contains the provisions governing the assignment of each aircraft operator to its administering Member State. The list of aircraft operators and their administering Member States (hereinafter "the list") should ensure that each operator knows which Member State it will be regulated by and that Member States are clear on which operators they should regulate.
    [Show full text]
  • Demand Elasticity Im Profitability on Zagreb-Dubrovnik Airline Route
    DEMAND ELASTICITY IM PROFITABILITY ON ZAGREB-DUBROVNIK AIRLINE ROUTE Faculty of Economics and Business - Zagreb, Trg J.F. Kennedya 6, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia [email protected] Tomislav HERCEG Faculty of Economics and Business - Zagreb, Trg J.F. Kennedya 6, 10 000 Zagreb, Croatia [email protected] Abstract Croatia Airlines, a national air carrier in Croatia, faces profitability issues for years. It partly relies on Government subsidies for a minimum daily number of flights between the capital and the other Croatian cities. Since Zagreb and Dubrovnik are the most distant and without fast road route (there is no highway in the Dubrovnik-Neretva county), the number of passengers is significant, as well as the turnover. This paper analyses how revenue management on the Zagreb-Dubrovnik-Zagreb air route could impr profitability. The revenue management analysis is based on the determination of demand function dynamics on the mentioned route. Data required for obtaining this research was taken from Croatia Airlines database, but modified using th preserve corporate secret. Profit management analysis on the above mentioned route is based on the analysis of a revenue function. It is because, due to the agreement Croatia Airlines has with Croatian Government, a fixed number of daily flights to Dubrovnik and back fixes the cost component of a profit function. Therefore only revenue function has a dynamics to be analysed, which in turn depends on demand function. Demand function is estimated as a function where the number of daily passengers (quantity, dependant variable) is affected by a corresponding daily average ticket price, and a moving average of a temperature (10 days average) as a deseasoning tool in the time period 2013-2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Punctuality Statistics Economic Regulation Group Aviation Data Unit
    Punctuality Statistics Economic Regulation Group Aviation Data Unit Birmingham, Edinburgh, Gatwick, Glasgow, Heathrow, London City, Luton, Manchester, Newcastle, Stansted Full and Summary Analysis July 2006 Disclaimer The information contained in this report will be compiled from various sources and it will not be possible for the CAA to check and verify whether it is accurate and correct nor does the CAA undertake to do so. Consequently the CAA cannot accept any liability for any financial loss caused by the persons reliance on it. Contents Foreword Introductory Notes Full Analysis – By Reporting Airport Birmingham Edinburgh Gatwick Glasgow Heathrow London City Luton Manchester Newcastle Stansted Full Analysis With Arrival / Departure Split – By A Origin / Destination Airport B C – E F – H I – L M – N O – P Q – S T – U V – Z Summary Analysis FOREWORD 1 CONTENT 1.1 Punctuality Statistics: Heathrow, Gatwick, Manchester, Glasgow, Birmingham, Luton, Stansted, Edinburgh, Newcastle and London City - Full and Summary Analysis is prepared by the Civil Aviation Authority with the co-operation of the airport operators and Airport Coordination Ltd. Their assistance is gratefully acknowledged. 2 ENQUIRIES 2.1 Statistics Enquiries concerning the information in this publication and distribution enquiries concerning orders and subscriptions should be addressed to: Civil Aviation Authority Room K4 G3 Aviation Data Unit CAA House 45/59 Kingsway London WC2B 6TE Tel. 020-7453-6258 or 020-7453-6252 or email [email protected] 2.2 Enquiries concerning further analysis of punctuality or other UK civil aviation statistics should be addressed to: Tel: 020-7453-6258 or 020-7453-6252 or email [email protected] Please note that we are unable to publish statistics or provide ad hoc data extracts at lower than monthly aggregate level.
    [Show full text]
  • Tenth Session of the Statistics Division
    STA/10-WP/6 International Civil Aviation Organization 2/10/09 WORKING PAPER TENTH SESSION OF THE STATISTICS DIVISION Montréal, 23 to 27 November 2009 Agenda Item 1: Civil aviation statistics — ICAO classification and definition REVIEW OF DEFINITIONS OF DOMESTIC AND CABOTAGE AIR SERVICES (Presented by the Secretariat) SUMMARY Currently, ICAO uses two different definitions to identify the traffic of domestic flight sectors of international flights; one used by the Statistics Programme, based on the nature of a flight stage, and the other, used for the economic studies on air transport, based on the origin and final destination of a flight (with one or more flight stages). Both definitions have their shortcomings and may affect traffic forecasts produced by ICAO for domestic operations. A similar situation arises with the current inclusion of cabotage services under international operations. After reviewing these issues, the Fourteenth Meeting of the Statistics Panel (STAP/14) agreed to recommend that no changes be made to the current definitions and instructions. Action by the division is in paragraph 5. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 In its activities in the field of air transport economics and statistics, ICAO is currently using two different definitions to identify the domestic services of an air carrier. The first one used by the Statistics Programme has been reaffirmed and clarified during Ninth Meeting of the Statistics Division (STA/9) and it is the one currently shown in the Air Transport Reporting Forms. The second one is being used by the Secretariat in the studies on international airline operating economics which have been carried out since 1976 and in pursuance of Assembly Resolution A36-15, Appendix G (reproduced in Appendix A).
    [Show full text]
  • Elenco Codici IATA Delle Compagnie Aeree
    Elenco codici IATA delle compagnie aeree. OGNI COMPAGNIA AEREA HA UN CODICE IATA Un elenco dei codici ATA delle compagnie aeree è uno strumento fondamentale, per chi lavora in agenzia viaggi e nel settore del turismo in generale. Il codice IATA delle compagnie aeree, costituito da due lettere, indica un determinato vettore aereo. Ad esempio, è utilizzato nelle prime due lettere del codice di un volo: – AZ 502, AZ indica la compagnia aerea Alitalia. – FR 4844, FR indica la compagnia aerea Ryanair -AF 567, AF, indica la compagnia aerea Air France Il codice IATA delle compagnie aeree è utilizzato per scopi commerciali, nell’ambito di una prenotazione, orari (ad esempio nel tabellone partenza e arrivi in aeroporto) , biglietti , tariffe , lettere di trasporto aereo e bagagli Di seguito, per una visione di insieme, una lista in ordine alfabetico dei codici di molte compagnie aeree di tutto il mondo. Per una ricerca più rapida e precisa, potete cliccare il tasto Ctrl ed f contemporaneamente. Se non doveste trovare un codice IATA di una compagnia aerea in questa lista, ecco la pagina del sito dell’organizzazione Di seguito le sigle iata degli aeroporti di tutto il mondo ELENCO CODICI IATA COMPAGNIE AEREE: 0A – Amber Air (Lituania) 0B – Blue Air (Romania) 0J – Jetclub (Svizzera) 1A – Amadeus Global Travel Distribution (Spagna) 1B – Abacus International (Singapore) 1C – Electronic Data Systems (Svizzera) 1D – Radixx Solutions International (USA) 1E – Travelsky Technology (Cina) 1F – INFINI Travel Information (Giappone) G – Galileo International
    [Show full text]
  • Abelag Aviation Aigle Azur Transports Aeriens Air
    COMITÉ DE COORDINATION DES AÉROPORTS FRANÇAIS FRENCH AIRPORTS COORDINATION COMMITTEE Membres au 1er septembre 2016 Members on September 1st 2016 Transporteurs aériens - Air carriers : AAF ABELAG AVIATION AAL AIGLE AZUR TRANSPORTS AERIENS AAR AIR ATLANTIQUE ABW AMERICAN AIRLINES ACA AMSTERDAM AIRLINES ADR ASIANA AIRLINES AEA AFRIQIYAH AIRWAYS AEE AIR ATLANTA ICELANDIC AFL AIR CONTRACTORS LTD AFR AIRBRIDGE CARGO AHY ABX AIR AIC AIR ARABIA AIZ AIR CANADA ALK AIR ORIENT AMC ITALI AIRLINES AMX ANTONOV AIRLINES ANA AIR ONE ANE ALYZIA ASSISTANCE ADP ASL ADRIA AIRWAYS AUA AIR EUROPA AUI AEGEAN AIRLINES AZA AIR ITALY POLSKA BAW STEVE TEST TO KEEP BCS ASTRAEUS BEE AEROSVIT AIRLINES BEL AIR ITALY BER AIR FRANCE HANDLING BIE AEROFLOT RUSSIAN AIRLINES BMR AIR FRANCE BMS AZERBAIJAN AIRLINES BOS AVIES BRU AIRBUS INDUSTRIE BTI AIR INDIA CAI AIR GABON INTERNATIONAL CAJ ARKIA ISRAELI AIRLINES CCA YAK SERVICE AIRLINES CCM SRILANKAN AIRLINES CES HEWA BORA CFE ALYSAIR aviation generale CHH AIR MALTA CLG AMERICAN TRANSAIR CPA AMC AVIATION CRC AEROMEXICO CRL ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS CSA AIR NOSTRUM CSN AIR NIGERIA CTN YANAIR CUB AIR NEW ZEALAND DAH AEOLIAN AIRLINES DAL CODE ASSISTANT AVIAPARTNER DJT ARIK INTERNATIONAL DLH ATA AEROCONDOR DTH AEROLINEAS ARGENTINAS EIN AIR ARMENIA ELL SMARTLYNX ITALIA ELY ARAVCO LTD ETD AirSERBIA ETH AVANTI AIR EVA AUSTRIAN AIRLINES EWG AUGSBURG AIRWAYS EZE UKRAINE INTL AIRLINES EZS AURIGNY AIR SERVICES EZY TITAN AIRWAYS FDX US AIRWAYS FHY AIR INDIA EXPRESS FIN AIR EXPLORE FPO ATLANT-SOYUZ FWI ALITALIA GFA ARCUS AIR GMI ASTRA AIRLINES
    [Show full text]
  • Luca Mancini
    Curriculum Vitae Luca Mancini PERSONAL INFORMATION Luca Mancini Address: P.za Gen. Carlo Alberto dalla Chiesa, 40 – 00054 Fiumicino (Rome) – ITALY Mobile: +39 328 3622407 e-mail : [email protected] D.O.B.: 11 FEB 1973 Nationality: Italian Sex: Male WORK EXPERIENCE September 2010 – today CAMO – Avionics & Electrical Systems – Manager DOA – Compliance Verification Engineer Meridiana Maintenance (Olbia – ITALY) In the frame of Meridiana Maintenance CAMO – Engineering Department, manages a team of engineers and is responsible for the engineering support concerning Avionics & Electrical Systems issues provided to customers operating several aircraft types (A320FAM, A330, MD80 and B717). Provided support concerns mandatory (Airworthiness Directives) and not mandatory (Service Bulletins, Service Letters, Operators Information Telex) documentation evaluation, issuing of CAMO documentation for modifications embodiment / inspections accomplishment, troubleshooting analysis in support to Maintenance Control Center / maintenance staff and Special Operations (LVP, RNAV, RVSM, ETOPS) technical management. As Area Manager also provides support to Training Department as technical instructor in the organization of internal aircraft type training. Starting from August 2011, in the frame of the new Meridiana Maintenance Design Organization approval, also hold the position of Compliance Verification Engineer in the design of changes to large aeroplanes concerning the installation of avionics equipment, associated systems and electrical systems. Main responsibilities are the approval of all compliance documents, including test programmes and data, necessary for the verification of compliance with the applicable CS and environmental protection requirements as well as the approval of the technical content (completeness, technical accuracy) of the manuals approved by the Agency (AFM, the ALS of the ICA and the CMR document).
    [Show full text]
  • Development Potentials of Low Cost Aviation in the Republic of Croatia
    A. Vidović, S. Steiner, I. Štimac: Development Potentials of Low Cost Aviation in the Republic of Croatia ANDRIJA VIDOVIĆ, Ph.D. Traffic Planning E-mail: [email protected] Review SANJA STEINER, Ph.D. Accepted: Mar. 10, 2011 E-mail: [email protected] Approved: Nov. 15, 2011 University of Zagreb, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences Vukelićeva 4, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia IGOR ŠTIMAC, M.Sc. E-mail: [email protected] Zagreb Airport Ltd. Pleso bb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia DEVELOPMENT POTENTIALS OF LOW COST AVIATION IN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA ABSTRACT and the share of traditional companies was gradually reduced. The liberalization of the aviation market has enabled Functional organization and the associated traf- low-cost airlines to take over a significant share in the avia- fic and technological processes applied in low-cost tion market. Benefits of low-cost models are multiple, both airlines resulted in up to 50 percent lower operating for passengers and for secondary and regional airports, costs compared to traditional companies. Currently in which were neglected in the past and which record signifi- cant inflow of passengers with the arrival of low-cost airlines. Europe there are 58 low-cost airlines that operate and In the structure of the air traffic in the Republic of Croatia they generate 38 percent of total passenger traffic and in the last ten years, there has been a progressive growth of 23 percent of total Instrumental Flight Rules (IFR) op- foreign low-cost airline operations, which suggests a poten- erations. tial for the operation of a Croatian low-cost airline.
    [Show full text]
  • Base Abandonments by Low-Cost Carriers
    Journal of Air Transport Management 55 (2016) 234e244 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Air Transport Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jairtraman Base abandonments by low-cost carriers * Paolo Malighetti, Stefano Paleari, Renato Redondi Department of Management, Information and Production Engineering, University of Bergamo, Viale Pasubio 7/b, Dalmine 24044, Italy article info abstract Article history: This paper is the first attempt to systematically investigate the phenomenon of base abandonments by Received 8 February 2016 low-cost carriers (LCCs) in the world, from 1997 to 2014. Our results identify 109 cases where the LCCs Received in revised form decreased their presence in airports by at least 50 per cent in terms of offered seats. In 28 cases, the LCCs 8 April 2016 completely abandoned the airports. The incidence of downsizing is significantly reduced for important Accepted 11 June 2016 base airports. The abandonment by LCCs can be reversed, even though this is not very likely; in only 7.3 per cent of cases the same LCCs recovered full capacity. The impact on airports of LCC abandonments depends on the carrier level of dominance. The presence of middle size alternative airports increases the Keywords: Low-cost carriers likelihood of downsizings. © Base abandonment 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Based aircrafts Airport-airline relationship 1. Introduction power in switching is markedly on the LCC side. Indeed, some LCCs are famous for their occasionally aggressive A recent study on airport competition, the report commissioned approaches to obtain favourable deals with airports and other by ACI Europe to Copenhagen Economics (2012), discussed airline suppliers, and often we read newspaper reports about LCCs switching, that is the ability of an airline to relocate its services, as a threatening to abandon airports.
    [Show full text]
  • Punctuality Statistics Economic Regulation Group Aviation Data Unit
    Punctuality Statistics Economic Regulation Group Aviation Data Unit Birmingham, Edinburgh, Gatwick, Glasgow, Heathrow, London City, Luton, Manchester, Newcastle, Stansted Full and Summary Analysis June 2007 Disclaimer The information contained in this report has been compiled from various sources of data. CAA validates this data, however, no warranty is given as to its accuracy, integrity or reliability. CAA cannot accept liability for any financial loss caused by a person’s reliance on any of these statistics. No statistical data provided by CAA maybe sold on to a third party. CAA insists that they are referenced in any publication that makes reference to CAA Statistics. Contents Foreword Introductory Notes Full Analysis – By Reporting Airport Birmingham Edinburgh Gatwick Glasgow Heathrow London City Luton Manchester Newcastle Stansted Full Analysis With Arrival / Departure Split – By A Origin / Destination Airport B C – E F – H I – L M – N O – P Q – S T – U V – Z Summary Analysis FOREWORD 1 CONTENT 1.1 Punctuality Statistics: Heathrow, Gatwick, Manchester, Glasgow, Birmingham, Luton, Stansted, Edinburgh, Newcastle and London City - Full and Summary Analysis is prepared by the Civil Aviation Authority with the co-operation of the airport operators and Airport Coordination Ltd. Their assistance is gratefully acknowledged. 2 ENQUIRIES 2.1 Statistics Enquiries concerning the information in this publication and distribution enquiries concerning orders and subscriptions should be addressed to: Civil Aviation Authority Room K4 G3 Aviation Data Unit CAA House 45/59 Kingsway London WC2B 6TE Tel. 020-7453-6258 or 020-7453-6252 or email [email protected] 2.2 Enquiries concerning further analysis of punctuality or other UK civil aviation statistics should be addressed to: Tel: 020-7453-6258 or 020-7453-6252 or email [email protected] Please note that we are unable to publish statistics or provide ad hoc data extracts at lower than monthly aggregate level.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Transport: Annual Report 2005
    ANALYSIS OF THE EU AIR TRANSPORT INDUSTRY Final Report 2005 Contract no: TREN/05/MD/S07.52077 by Cranfield University Department of Air Transport Analysis of the EU Air Transport Industry, 2005 1 CONTENTS 1 AIR TRANSPORT INDUSTRY OVERVIEW......................................................................................11 2 REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS.....................................................................................................19 3 CAPACITY ............................................................................................................................................25 4. AIR TRAFFIC........................................................................................................................................36 5. AIRLINE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE............................................................................................54 6. AIRPORTS.............................................................................................................................................85 7 AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL ..................................................................................................................102 8. THE ENVIRONMENT ........................................................................................................................110 9 CONSUMER ISSUES..........................................................................................................................117 10 AIRLINE ALLIANCES .......................................................................................................................124
    [Show full text]
  • Jetstream 08/2010
    08 INTERNATIONALES LUFTFAHRTMAGAZIN 50. JahrgangJANUAR 2010 9 771424 493006 08/10 AUGUST 2010 Schweiz CHF 8.50 Europa EUR 6.00 50 50 5050 50 50 50www.jetstream.ch 505050 Sao Paolo Guarulhos Seattle: Stadt der Jets Titelstory: Lufthansa August-Poster: Trans Northern Super DC-3 im Anflug auf Anchorage NEWS | DEUTSCHLAND AUGUST 2010 Lassen Sie die NEWS < TITELBILD Schweiz 2 coolen Bilder Das neue Flaggschiff der Lufthansa ist der Deutschland 18 Airbus A380. Die erste Maschine, D-AIMA, Österreich 22 startet hier in Köln (Rainer Bexten, Köln, nicht davonfliegen. Frankreich / Italien 29 3.6.10). Europa 46 USA / Kanada 46 Lateinamerika 48 Abonnieren Sie jetstream. Afrika / Nahost / Asien / Ozeanien 48 AIRLINE: LUFTHANSA > Tom Ziegler zeigt die Meilensteine der neuen deutschen Lufthansa seit 1955 bis Im Abo günstiger! zum A380 auf. 6 Probeabo unter: www.jetstream.ch < FOTOBERICHT: SAO PAOLO Alexandre Polati und Joao Ricardo Franca Pinto, zwei Lokalmatadoren aus Sao Paolo, Redaktion zeigen Bilder des Flughafens Guarulhos. Moritz Herrmann [email protected] Milo Kalberer [email protected] Lukas Lusser [email protected] 30 Michael Pellaton [email protected] Mitarbeiter Abos Doris Kalberer • Dispo Michael Pellaton • Europa Felix Gasser • Finanzen Karl Freund, Hanspeter Roth • Bildredak- REISE: Seattle, StaDT DER JETS > tion Urs Diener, Roli Büsser, Francesco Frasa, Olav Rhensius, Benjamin Schudel, Mike Steffen • International Ernst Sommer • Layout Milo Kalberer • Reiseberichte Romano Germann, Lukas Lusser beleuchtet
    [Show full text]