DOCSLIB.ORG

Rating System for Rollover Resistance. an Assessm

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

COVER FINAL-R26/5/029:47PMPagec1 TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD NON-PROFIT ORG U.S. POSTAGE National Research Council 2101 Constitution Avenue, NW PAID WASHINGTON, DC Washington, DC 20418 PERMIT NO. 8970 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED ISBN 0-309-07249-2 An Assessment An NHTSA’s ating System for Rollover Resistance Rollover for System ating R TRB 265 REPORT SPECIAL THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES THE NATIONAL RESEARCH BOARD TRANSPORTATION The National Highway Traffic SafetyAdministration’s The NationalHighwayTraffic R R ollover Resistance ating Systemfor SPECIAL REPORT 265 SPECIAL REPORT An Assessment Transportation Research Board Special Report 265 Subscriber Category IVB safety and human performance Transportation Research Board publications are available by ordering individual pub- lications directly from the TRB Business Office, through the Internet at national acad- emies.org/trb, or by annual subscription through organizational or individual affiliation with TRB. Affiliates and library subscribers are eligible for substantial discounts. For further information, contact the Transportation Research Board Business Office, National Research Council, 2101 Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20418 (telephone 202-334-3214; fax 202-334-2519; or e-mail [email protected]). Copyright 2002 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competencies and with regard for appropriate balance. This report has been reviewed by a group other than the authors according to the procedures approved by a Report Review Committee consisting of members of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. This report was sponsored by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data National Research Council (U.S.). Committee for the Study of a Motor Vehicle Rollover Rating System. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s rating system for rollover resistance : an assessment / Committee for the Study of a Motor Vehicle Rollover Rating System. p. cm. — (Special report ; 265) “Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.” Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-309-07249-2 1. Motor vehicles—United States—Evaluation. 2. Motor vehicles—Stability. 3. United States. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration—Research. 4. Motor vehicles—Rollover protective structures. I. Title. II. Special report (National Research Council (U.S.). Transportation Research Board) ; 265. TL245.8 .N38 2002 629.2′31—dc21 2002067171 National Academy of Sciences National Academy of Engineering Institute of Medicine National Research Council The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. On the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a man- date that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts is president of the National Academy of Sciences. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. William A. Wulf is president of the National Academy of Engineering. The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the re- sponsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, on its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Kenneth I. Shine is president of the Institute of Medicine. The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the gov- ernment, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both the Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Bruce M. Alberts and Dr. William A. Wulf are chairman and vice chairman, respectively, of the National Research Council. The Transportation Research Board is a division of the National Research Council, which serves the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engi- neering. The Board’s mission is to promote innovation and progress in transportation by stimulating and conducting research, facilitating the dissemination of information, and encouraging the implementation of research results. The Board’s varied activities annually engage more than 4,000 engineers, scientists, and other transportation re- searchers and practitioners from the public and private sectors and academia, all of whom contribute their expertise in the public interest. The program is supported by state transportation departments, federal agencies including the component ad- ministrations of the U.S. Department of Transportation, and other organizations and individuals interested in the development of transportation. Committee for the Study of a Motor Vehicle Rollover Rating System Committee David N. Wormley, The Pennsylvania State University, Chair Karin M. Bauer, Midwest Research Institute, Kansas City, Missouri James E. Bernard, Iowa State University, Ames Ann Bostrom, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta Susan A. Ferguson, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, Arlington, Virginia B. John Garrick, NAE, Independent Consultant, Laguna Beach, California Paul A. Green, University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor David L. Harkey, University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center, Chapel Hill J. Karl Hedrick, University of California at Berkeley David C. Holloway, University of Maryland, College Park L. Daniel Metz, Metz Engineering and Racing, Champaign, Illinois N. Eugene Savin, University of Iowa, Iowa City Kimberly M. Thompson, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts Transportation Research Board Staff Jill Wilson, Study Director Preface his study was conducted in response to a congressional mandate, con- Ttained in the Department of Transportation and Related Agencies Ap- propriations Act, 2001 (Public Law 106–346), which required the U.S. Department of Transportation to fund a study by the National Academy of Sciences on whether the static stability factor is a scientifically valid mea- surement that presents practical, useful information to the public, including a comparison of the static stability factor test versus a test with rollover metrics based on dynamic driving conditions that may induce rollover events.1 In response to a request from the National Highway Traffic Safety Ad- ministration (NHTSA), the Transportation Research Board (TRB) of the National Research Council (NRC) formed a committee of 13 members under the leadership of David Wormley, Dean of the College of Engineer- ing at the Pennsylvania State University. Panel members have expertise in the following areas: mechanical engineering and vehicle dynamics; vehicle safety and testing; vehicle control systems; roadway and roadside design; statistics, econometrics, and data analysis; risk assessment and communi- cation; public policy; consumer information; and human factors and driver behavior. The committee met four times between April and October 2001. The first two meetings were devoted primarily to information gathering; details of invited presentations and participation in the open discussions are given in Appendix B. Additional information-gathering activities undertaken by committee members included visits to the Consumers Union Vehicle Test Facility in East Haddam, Connecticut, and site visits to Ford, General Motors, and DaimlerChrysler facilities in the Detroit area (see Appendix B). The third and fourth committee meetings were devoted to deliberative discus- sions and preparation of the committee’s final report. An interim report, issued in July 2001, presented the committee’s preliminary findings and identified outstanding issues to be addressed during the remainder of the study. To expedite the study process, the committee divided into three groups, each of which assumed primary responsibility for information gathering and 1 The full
Recommended publications
  • State of Louisiana Shall Remain Valid for Sixty (60) Days After Discharge, Provided the License Was Valid (Not Expired, Suspended Or Revoked) Upon Entrance to Service

    State of Louisiana Shall Remain Valid for Sixty (60) Days After Discharge, Provided the License Was Valid (Not Expired, Suspended Or Revoked) Upon Entrance to Service

    Class D & E Driver’s Guide LOUISIANA OFFICE OF MOTOR VEHICLES DPSMV2052 (R042013) Message from the Commissioner “Welcome to driving in Louisiana.” I am pleased to present the Louisiana Driver’s Guide to our new and current drivers. This guide is designed to provide you with the rules of the road, knowledge to assist you in making better driving decisions, and valuable information on safety and sharing the road with others. It is incumbent upon you, the driver, to respect all traffic laws and other drivers as well. Driving is a vital part of life. It provides you with a means of attaining the necessities of daily living as well as providing you with the added convenience to move about at leisure. The driving experience, however, is a privilege and comes with great responsibilities. Please strive to become a safe and dependable driver to ensure that this privilege is not lost. Driving, the same as life, is a constant learning experience. The information contained in this guide, along with your experience and responsive actions while driving, will assist in protecting you, your family, and other drivers. This guide is not intended to be an official legal reference to the Louisiana traffic laws. It only highlights those laws, driving practices and procedures that you will use most often. It should be noted that the material in this guide is subject to change to comply with amended State and Federal legislations. Remember to buckle up. Safety belts save lives. Let’s work together to make Louisiana a safer place for all. Stephen F.
  • TABLE of CONTENTS 1 Before Driving 2 When Driving 3 Interior

    TABLE of CONTENTS 1 Before Driving 2 When Driving 3 Interior

    TABLE OF CONTENTS Adjusting and operating features such as door locks, mir- 1 Before driving rors, and steering column. 2 When driving Driving, stopping and safe-driving information. Air conditioning and audio systems, as well as other interior 3 Interior features features for a comfortable driving experience. 4 Maintenance Cleaning and protecting your vehicle, performing do-it-your- and care self maintenance, and maintenance information. 5 When trouble What to do if the vehicle needs to be towed, gets a flat tire, arises or is involved in an accident. 6 Vehicle specifications Detailed vehicle information. Reporting safety defects for US owners and seat belt in- 7 For owners structions for Canadian owners. Index Alphabetical listing of information contained in this manual. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Index 1-6. Theft deterrent system 1 Before driving Engine immobilizer system......... 70 Alarm.................................................... 72 1-1. Key information Theft prevention labels Keys ...................................................... 22 (U.S.A.)............................................. 74 1-2. Opening, closing and locking the 1-7. Safety information doors Correct driving posture............... 75 Wireless remote control.............. 24 SRS airbags ....................................... 77 Side doors .......................................... 26 Front passenger occupant classification system.................... 90 Back door............................................ 31 Child restraint systems ................. 95 1-3. Adjustable
  • Increased Automobile Fuel Efficiency and Synthetic Fuels: Alternatives for Reducing Oil Imports

    Increased Automobile Fuel Efficiency and Synthetic Fuels: Alternatives for Reducing Oil Imports

    Increased Automobile Fuel Efficiency and Synthetic Fuels: Alternatives for Reducing Oil Imports September 1982 NTIS order #PB83-126094 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 82-600603 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 Foreword This report presents the findings of an assessment requested by the Senate Com- mittee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. The study assesses and compares increased automobile fuel efficiency and synthetic fuels production with respect to their potential to reduce conventional oil consumption, and their costs and impacts. Con- servation and fuel switching as a means of reducing stationary oil uses are also con- sidered, but in considerably less detail, in order to enable estimates of plausible future oil imports. We are grateful for the assistance of the project advisory panels and the many other people who provided advice, information, and reviews. It should be understood, how- ever, that OTA assumes full responsibility for this report, which does not necessarily represent the views of individual members of the advisory panels. Director Automobile Fuel Efficiency Advisory Panel Michael J. Rabins, Chairman Wayne State University Maudine R. Cooper* John B. Heywood National Urban League, Inc. Massachusetts Institute of Technology John Ferron John Holden National Automobile Dealers Association Ford Motor Co. Donald Friedman Maryann N. Keller Minicar, Inc. Paine, Webber, Mitchell, & Hutchins Herbert Fuhrman Paul Larsen National Institute for GMC Truck and Coach Division Automobile Service Excellence Robert D. Nell James M. Gill Consumers Union The Ethyl Corp. Kenneth Orski R. Eugene Goodson** German Marshall Fund of the United States Hoover Universal, Inc.
  • Public Citizen Copyright © 2016 by Public Citizen Foundation All Rights Reserved

    Public Citizen Copyright © 2016 by Public Citizen Foundation All Rights Reserved

    Public Citizen Copyright © 2016 by Public Citizen Foundation All rights reserved. Public Citizen Foundation 1600 20th St. NW Washington, D.C. 20009 www.citizen.org ISBN: 978-1-58231-099-2 Doyle Printing, 2016 Printed in the United States of America PUBLIC CITIZEN THE SENTINEL OF DEMOCRACY CONTENTS Preface: The Biggest Get ...................................................................7 Introduction ....................................................................................11 1 Nader’s Raiders for the Lost Democracy....................................... 15 2 Tools for Attack on All Fronts.......................................................29 3 Creating a Healthy Democracy .....................................................43 4 Seeking Justice, Setting Precedents ..............................................61 5 The Race for Auto Safety ..............................................................89 6 Money and Politics: Making Government Accountable ..............113 7 Citizen Safeguards Under Siege: Regulatory Backlash ................155 8 The Phony “Lawsuit Crisis” .........................................................173 9 Saving Your Energy .................................................................... 197 10 Going Global ...............................................................................231 11 The Fifth Branch of Government................................................ 261 Appendix ......................................................................................271 Acknowledgments ........................................................................289
  • Trends in the Static Stability Factor of Passenger Cars, Light Trucks, and Vans

    Trends in the Static Stability Factor of Passenger Cars, Light Trucks, and Vans

    DOT HS 809 868 June 2005 NHTSA Technical Report Trends in the Static Stability Factor of Passenger Cars, Light Trucks, and Vans This document is available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161 The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear only because they are considered essential to the object of this report. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. DOT HS 809 868 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date June 2005 Trends in the Static Stability Factor of Passenger Cars, Light Trucks, and Vans 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Marie C. Walz 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Office of Regulatory Analysis and Evaluation Planning, Evaluation and Budget 11. Contract or Grant No. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, DC 20590 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Department of Transportation NHTSA Technical Report National Highway Traffic Safety Administration 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Washington, DC 20590 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract Rollover crashes kill more than 10,000 occupants of passenger vehicles each year. As part of its mission to reduce fatalities and injuries, since model year 2001 NHTSA has included rollover information as part of its NCAP ratings. One of the primary means of assessing rollover risk is the static stability factor (SSF), a measurement of a vehicle’s resistance to rollover. The higher the SSF, the lower the rollover risk.
  • Plaintiffs, ) ) V

    Plaintiffs, ) ) V

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CENTER FOR AUTO SAFETY, et al., ) ) Case No. 04-0392 (ESH) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC ) SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS This case challenges a de facto legislative rule, promulgated in a 1998 letter to auto manufacturers from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (“NHTSA”), that permits vehicle manufacturers to conduct “regional recalls.” Regional recalls exclude vehicle owners residing in large parts of the country from the warning and free remedy that is guaranteed by the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act (“Safety Act”) to all owners of motor vehicles containing safety-related defects. In its motion to dismiss, NHTSA suggests that plaintiffs Public Citizen and the Center for Auto Safety want to substitute their judgment for that of the agency. To the contrary, through this lawsuit, plaintiffs hope to force NHTSA to comply with Congress’s judgment that safety recalls should protect all motorists, not just those living in select states. NHTSA’s motion falters from the start by mischaracterizing the complaint. Contrary to NHTSA’s repeated statements, plaintiffs are not challenging individual past or future regional recalls. Rather, plaintiffs challenge NHTSA’s across-the-board rule authorizing and setting the standards for regional recalls. The agency’s 1998 letters to auto manufacturers contain specific directives and requirements controlling the conduct of regional recalls, which both bind manufacturers and limit NHTSA’s discretion to take certain actions. Furthermore, plaintiffs have standing to bring this action, as amply illustrated by the complaint, declarations ignored by NHTSA, and additional declarations submitted with this opposition.
  • MULTIDISCIPLINARY ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION SINGLE VEHICLE ACCIDENT STUDY VOLUME II: Technical Report

    MULTIDISCIPLINARY ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION SINGLE VEHICLE ACCIDENT STUDY VOLUME II: Technical Report

    DOT HS- 803 653 MULTIDISCIPLINARY ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION SINGLE VEHICLE ACCIDENT STUDY VOLUME II: Technical Report Kurucz, Morrow, Fogarty, Jaicek and Mapper University of Miami Post Office Box 8294 Coral Gables, Florida * Contract No. DOT HS- 060.3-611 Contract Amt. $229,882 NOVEMBER 1911 FINAL REPORT This document is available to the U.S. public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161 Prepared For U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, D.C. 20590 * Prepared for the Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, under Contract No. DOT-HS-060-3-671. The opinions, findings and conclusions expressed in this publica­ tion are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No.­ 2 (,a v...r.rnenr Ar, nss^un 140. :1. Neup^enrs Catalog No. DOT -HS -_80_3 653 - 1 4 Tltle and Subr.rle­ 5. Rep a.t [dare Single Vehicle Accident Study­ November, 1977 Final Report­ b Par(orm,ng Organital on Code r8. Perlo ming Orgomration Report No. I 1. Authortsl­ Final Report Kurucz, Morrow, Fogarty, Janicek and Klapper 9. Performing Organi=otion Name and Address­ 3. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) University of Miami P.O. Box 8294­ I). Contract or Grant No. Coral Gables, Florida­ DOT-HS-060-3-671 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Final Report 1973-1976 Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, D.C. 20590 14 Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Contract Technical Manager:­ Nicholas G.
  • Senator SIMON. Mr. Chairman, If I Could Just Say I Am Going to the Same Press Conference on Health Care

    Senator SIMON. Mr. Chairman, If I Could Just Say I Am Going to the Same Press Conference on Health Care

    468 Senator SIMON. Mr. Chairman, if I could just say I am going to the same press conference on health care. The CHAIRMAN. One thing Mr. Nader understands is press con- ferences, and I am sure he will understand your need to be there. Senator METZENBAUM. Also, he understands health care. The CHAIRMAN. He understands health care, as well. As a matter of fact, I am surprised he is not going to the press conference with you. Senator COHEN. Mr. Chairman, I am told there is going to be a vote at 1:45 p.m. The CHAIRMAN. I am glad to be informed of all these things. Why don't we just begin and we will see where the schedule takes us. Mr. Nader, welcome. PANEL CONSISTING OF RALPH NADER, WASHINGTON, DC; SID- NEY M. WOLFE, CITIZEN'S GROUP, WASHINGTON, DC; LLOYD CONSTANTINE, CONSTANTINE & ASSOCIATES, NEW YORK, NY; AND RALPH ZESTES, KOGOD COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AD- MINISTRATION, AMERICAN UNIVERSITY, WASHINGTON, DC STATEMENT OF RALPH NADER Mr. NADER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members of the com- mittee. I would like to submit my 20-page testimony and note that there are five important attachments: First, one by Professor Carstensen, of the University of Wisconsin Law School, dealing with the case of price squeeze that was so widely discussed earlier in these hear- ings, a case by Judge Breyer; second, a thorough critique by a friend of Judge Breyer, but he is a critic, Professor Tom McGarity, of the University of Texas Law School, on Judge Breyer's health and environmental safety positions; third, a critique of Judge Breyer's chapter on the National Highway Traffic Safety Adminis- tration, by Clarence Ditlow and Joan Claybrook, which illustrates that some of Judge Breyer's research is quite shoddy; fourth, a list of very stimulating questions by Prof.
  • Federal Regulatory Management of the Automobile in the United States, 1966–1988

    Federal Regulatory Management of the Automobile in the United States, 1966–1988

    FEDERAL REGULATORY MANAGEMENT OF THE AUTOMOBILE IN THE UNITED STATES, 1966–1988 by LEE JARED VINSEL DISSERTATION Presented to the Faculty of the College of Humanities and Social Sciences of Carnegie Mellon University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Carnegie Mellon University May 2011 Dissertation Committee: Professor David A. Hounshell, Chair Professor Jay Aronson Professor John Soluri Professor Joel A. Tarr Professor Steven Usselman (Georgia Tech) © 2011 Lee Jared Vinsel ii Dedication For the Vinsels, the McFaddens, and the Middletons and for Abigail, who held the ship steady iii Abstract Federal Regulatory Management of the Automobile in the United States, 1966–1988 by LEE JARED VINSEL Dissertation Director: Professor David A. Hounshell Throughout the 20th century, the automobile became the great American machine, a technological object that became inseparable from every level of American life and culture from the cycles of the national economy to the passions of teen dating, from the travails of labor struggles to the travels of “soccer moms.” Yet, the automobile brought with it multiple dimensions of risk: crashes mangled bodies, tailpipes spewed toxic exhausts, and engines “guzzled” increasingly limited fuel resources. During the 1960s and 1970s, the United States Federal government created institutions—primarily the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration within the Department of Transportation and the Office of Mobile Source Pollution Control in the Environmental Protection Agency—to regulate the automobile industry around three concerns, namely crash safety, fuel efficiency, and control of emissions. This dissertation examines the growth of state institutions to regulate these three concerns during the 1960s and 1970s through the 1980s when iv the state came under fire from new political forces and governmental bureaucracies experienced large cutbacks in budgets and staff.
  • Open Government: Lessons from America

    Open Government: Lessons from America

    OPEN GOVERNMENT Lessons from America STEWART DRESNER May 1980 £3.00 OPEN GOVERNMENT: LESSONS FROM AMERICA CONTENTS Page Foreword Preface I Introduction 1 II The Open Government Concept and the British Government response 3 III Hew Open Government Legislation works in the United States 8 (1) Hie Freedom of Information Act 8 (2) The Privacy Act 25 (3) The Government in the Sunshine Act 31 IV What needs to be kept secret? 42 V Who uses the American Open Government Laws? 60 (1) Public Interest Groups 61 (2) The Media 69 (3) Individuals and Scholars 74 (4) Companies 76 (5) Civil Servants 80 VI Balancing Public Access to Government Information with the Protection of Individual Privacy 88 (1) The Issues 88 (2) The Protection of Personal Information by the U.S. Privacy Act 1974 91 (3) The Personal Privacy Exenption to the 101A 96 (4) The Relationship between the IOIA and the PA 98 (5) Public Access and Privacy Protection in an Administrative Programme 99 ii Page VII Ensuring Government Compliance with Public Access legislation 105 (1) Actaiinistrative Procedures 105 (2) Appeal Procedures 107 (3) Monitoring the Effectiveness of Public Access Legislation 117 VIII Ihe Costs and Benefits of Open Government 126 (1) National Security 127 (2) Constitutional Relationships 127 (3) Administrative and other Costs 132 IX Conclusion: Information, Democracy and Power 141 Bibliography i-xi FOREWORD Last year the related subjects of official secrets and freedom of information had a thorough but abortive airing. Mr. Clement Freud's Official Information Bill after a long and interesting committee stage became a victim of the general election.
  • Rollover of Heavy Commercial Vehicles

    Rollover of Heavy Commercial Vehicles

    Rollover of Heavy Commercial Vehicles - UMTRI-99- 19 August, 1999 C. B. Winkler R. D. Ervin The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute 2901 Baxter Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48 109 for Volvo Truck Corporation, AB Goteborg, Sweden and the Great Lakes Center for Truck and Transit Research Ann Arbor, Michigan Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Reciplent's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date August, 1999 Rollover of Heavy Commercial Vehicles 6. Performing Organization Code 8. Performing Organlzatlon Report Nio. 7. Author@) Winkler, C. B.; Ervin, R.D. - 9. Performing Organlzation Name and Address 1 10. work unit NO. (TRAIS) The University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute 11. Contract or Grant NO. 2901 Baxter Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2150 13. Type of Report and Perlod Coverejd - 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Final Report Volvo Truck Corporation, 1B Great lakes Center for Truck and Transit Research 14. Sponsoring Agency Code I 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract The state-of-the-art understanding of rollover of the commercial vehicle is reviewed. Accident statistics are presented which highlight the severity and lethal nature of rollover crashes. Physical and statistical evidlence for the linkage between vehicle roll stability and the actual occurrence of rollover accidents is presented. The fundamentals of static roll stability are described in detail and then enhanced with discussion of dynamilc considerations of the rollover process. The text concludes with a discussion of the evolving use of intelligent electronic systems and active vehicle control for reducing the occurrence of rollover.
  • The Lemon Book: Auto Rights by Ralph Nader;Clarence Ditlow

    The Lemon Book: Auto Rights by Ralph Nader;Clarence Ditlow

    The Lemon Book: Auto Rights By Ralph Nader;Clarence Ditlow Used Car Lemon Law Fact Sheet Auto Leasing Rights; Auto Repair Tips; Basic Banking; Before You Hire An Auto Mechanic; Buying Online; Car Rental Tip Sheet; Buy The Lemon Book: Auto Rights by Ralph Nader, Clarence Ditlow (ISBN: 9781559210195) from Amazon's Book Store. Free UK delivery on eligible orders. The Lemon Book: Auto Rights. Introduction; Buy This Book; Read Online; Export Data; Author: Ralph Nader, Clarence Ditlow, Laura Polacheck, Tamar Publisher: Moyer former administrator of NHTSA and now head of Ralph Nader's Public Citizen, Clarence Ditlow, Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. All Rights Reserved. Clarence Ditlow is the author of Little Secrets of the Auto Industry (0.0 avg rating, 0 ratings, 0 reviews, Lemon laws are American state laws that provide a remedy for purchasers of cars and other consumer goods in order to compensate for products that repeatedly fail to Texas laws related to warranty performance may cover your vehicle if your used vehicle is Check the information on the Texas Lemon Law that came with your vehicle. Auto Rights: Ralph Nader, Clarence Ditlow: 9781559211963: Books - Amazon.ca Amazon Try Prime. Your Store Deals Store Gift Cards Sell Help en fran ais. Shop by Clarence Ditlow. At the center of the Chrysler recall drama, a Center for Auto Safety and an early acolyte of the safety crusader Ralph Nader, Ralph Nader is a consumer a scathing indictment that lambasted the auto industry for producing unsafe Nader, Ralph, and Clarence Ditlow. Lemon Book: Ralph Nader is 69.