CONTINUITIES AND DISJUNCTURES IN URBAN PLANNING IN THE ANCIENT ANDES Jerry D. Moore DO NOT CITE IN ANY CONTEXT WITHOUT PERMISSION OF THE AUTHOR Jerry D. Moore, Department of Anthropology, California State University Dominguez Hills 1000 E. Victoria St., Carson, CA 90747 (
[email protected]) 1 A comparative analysis of prehispanic Andean cities indicates significant discontinuities in the organization of public space. Although architectonic components and architectural inventories recur in different urban traditions, there are marked differences in the overall plans of Andean cities and little continuity between the earliest Andean urban centers and earlier Formative settlements or between later capitals and cities associated with various Andean states and empires, such as Moche, Tiwanaku, Wari, Chan Chan or Cuszco. This suggests that the prehispanic Andean city was developed divergently and employed different principles of urban design, and that Andean societies deployed different forms of what Eric Wolf called “structural power,” in which the urban landscapes were the settings for different forms of power interactions through Andean prehistory. 2 The Central Andes have an urban tradition that is among the oldest known in the world (Figure 1). With the appearance of large settlements during the 3rd – 2nd millennia B.C. along the Peruvian coast, a constructed legacy began that rivals ancient Mesopotamian cities and antedates by at least a millennium the development of Mesoamerican urbanism (Makowski 2008). Yet, a diachronic perspective suggests that prehistoric urbanism was a fragile and inconstant process in the Andes, as prehistoric communities aggregated and dispersed, presumably in response to a range of social and environmental pressures.