Federal Election 1996
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Senate Crossbench Background 2016
Barton Deakin Brief: Senate Crossbench 4 August 2016 The 2016 federal election resulted in a large number of Senators elected that were not members of the two major parties. Senators and Members of the House of Representatives who are not part of the Coalition Government or the Labor Opposition are referred to collectively as the Senate ‘crossbench’. This Barton Deakin Brief outlines the policy positions of the various minor parties that constitute the crossbench. Background Due to the six year terms of Senators, at a normal election (held every three years) only 38 of the Senate’s 76 seats are voted on. As the 2016 federal election was a double dissolution election, all 76 seats were contested. To pass legislation a Government needs 39 votes in the Senate. As the Coalition won just 30 seats it will have to rely on the support of minor parties and independents to pass legislation when it is opposed by Labor. Since the introduction of new voting reforms in the Senate, minor parties can no longer rely on the redistribution of above-the-line votes according to preference flows to satisfy the 14.3% quota (or, in the case of a double dissolution, 7.7%) needed to win a seat in Senate elections. The new Senate voting reforms allowed voters to control their preferences by numbering all candidates above the line, thereby reducing the effectiveness of preference deals that have previously resulted in Senators being elected with a small fraction of the primary vote. To read Barton Deakin’s Brief on the Senate Voting Reforms, click here. -
Report of the Redistribution Committee
The 2009 Proposed Redistribution of Queensland into Electoral Divisions Report of the Redistribution Committee Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 Section 68 Table of contents Executive Summary 1 Direction for a redistribution of Queensland electoral divisions 2 Quota 2 Enrolment projections 3 Appointment of the Redistribution Committee for Queensland 4 Invitations to submit public suggestions and comments 4 Statutory requirements for the making of a proposed redistribution 6 Technical procedures 8 Analysis of population trends 8 Enrolment in existing divisions as at 19 February 2009 9 Analysis of enrolment trends 10 Enrolment projections for existing divisions as at 9 July 2012 12 General strategy 15 Public suggestions and comments 17 Guidelines for the naming of divisions 19 Name of new division 19 Proposed redistribution of Queensland – by division: 20 Proposed South-East Queensland (South) divisions 22 Proposed South-East Queensland (North) divisions 27 Proposed Country divisions 30 Conclusion 34 Table 1 – Determination of the quota 2 Table 2 – Enrolment projections at 9 July 2012 3 Table 3 – Queensland regions for proposed redistribution 16 Table 4 – Summary of movement of electors between divisions 17 Table 5 – Themes 18 Table 6 – Divisions in order of discussion 21 Table 7 – Enrolment of existing divisions 35 Table 8 – Summary of proposed divisions 36 Table 9 – General description of how proposed divisions are constituted 37 Graph 1 – Queensland population quotas from 1997 to 2009 9 Graph 2 – Variation from the enrolment quota as at end 19 February 2009 for existing divisions 11 Graph 3 – Variation from projected average enrolment as at 9 July 2012 for existing divisions 13 Map Projected enrolment for existing divisions as at 9 July 2012 14 Enclosures Sheet 1 – Maps 1 and 2 Sheet 2 – Map 3 Sheet 3 – Map 4 CD – Containing the public suggestions received and comments received on those suggestions. -
Federal Elections 1990
t/-<-c-~ The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia Federal Elections 1990 Gerard Newman Andrew Kopras Background Paper 20 July 1990 Parliamentary Research Service Department of the Parliamentary Library ISSN 10~'07 Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 1990 Except to the extent of the usee permitted under the Copyright Act 1968. no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including informltion storage and retrieval system, without the prior written consent of the Department of the Parliamentary Ubrary, other than by Members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official duties. Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Ubrary, 1990 Federal Elections 1090 Contents Table Title Page Introduction'" ..... .. ....... .. .......... .. .. .. •. ... ... ... .. ... .. 1 House of Representatives 1 National Summary 3 2 State Summary 4 3 Regional Summary 7 4 Party Status Summary 9 Sa Electoral Division Summary: Number 13 5b Electoral Division Summary: Percent........................... 17 6 Electoral Division Details 21 7 Two Party Preferred Vote. State Summary 46 8 Two Party Preferred Vote. Regional Summary 46 9 Two Party Preferred Vote. Party Status Summary 47 10 Two Party Preferred Vote by Electoral Division 48 11a Electoral Divisions Ranked by Two Party Preferred Vote: ALP Seats 52 11b Electoral Divisions Ranked by Two Party Preferred Vote: L1B/NP Seats 53 12 Electoral Divisions Ranked by Two Party Preferred Swing to L1B/NP 54 Senate 13 National Summary 55 14 State Summary ;................................. 56 15 Composition After 1 July 1990 59 16 Candidate Details 60 Appendix 1: Electoral Division Classification 70 Appendix 2: House of Representatives Elections 1949 to 1990 '" 74 Federal Elections 1990 1 INTRODUCTION This paper contains an analysis of voting in the Senate and House of Representatives elections held on 24 March 1990. -
The Importance of Boundaries
The importance of boundaries Colin Hughes Emeritus Professor of Politic Science, University of Queensland Research Paper 1 (November 2007) Democratic Audit of Australia Australian National University Canberra, ACT 0200 Australia http://democratic.audit.anu.edu.au The views expressed are the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Democratic Audit of Australia. If elections are to be thought fair, their outcomes should correspond as closely as possible to the inputs of voter preferences. A particular percentage of the votes counted for a party should produce close to the same percentage of the seats won by that party. Down that path lie the topics of partisan bias and proportional representation with multi-member electoral districts as the most common solution. But there is a second criterion of fairness which is that outcomes should correspond to the numbers of electors or people to be represented. That criterion is often called equality, and down that path lie the topics of malapportionment and enforced equality as a solution. The two criteria may not work in the same direction.1 In Australia the problem of equality has been debated mainly with respect to the dichotomy of town and country, ‘town’ usually meaning the State capital(s) which have been invariably by far the largest urban center in each State and ‘country’ the rest, though sometimes the larger provincial cities and towns get lumped in with their local metropolis. Should town voters have the same quantity of representation, measured by the number of electors in the electoral districts, as country voters? There has also been a sub-plot, which is what this paper is about, that concerns the existence of a small number of electoral districts spread over exceptionally large areas in which the population, and consequently the numbers of electors, is relatively thin on the ground and widely scattered. -
Todd Farrell Thesis
The Australian Greens: Realignment Revisited in Australia Todd Farrell Submitted in fulfilment for the requirements of the Doctorate of Philosophy Swinburne University of Technology Faculty of Health, Arts and Design School of Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities 2020 ii I declare that this thesis does not incorporate without acknowledgement any material previously submitted for a degree in any university or another educational institution and to the best of my knowledge and belief it does not contain any material previously published or written by another person except where due reference is made in the text. iii ABSTRACT Scholars have traditionally characterised Australian politics as a stable two-party system that features high levels of partisan identity, robust democratic features and strong electoral institutions (Aitkin 1982; McAllister 2011). However, this characterisation masks substantial recent changes within the Australian party system. Growing dissatisfaction with major parties and shifting political values have altered the partisan contest, especially in the proportionally- represented Senate. This thesis re-examines partisan realignment as an explanation for party system change in Australia. It draws on realignment theory to argue that the emergence and sustained success of the Greens represents a fundamental shift in the Australian party system. Drawing from Australian and international studies on realignment and party system reform, the thesis combines an historical institutionalist analysis of the Australian party system with multiple empirical measurements of Greens partisan and voter support. The historical institutionalist approach demonstrates how the combination of subnational voting mechanisms, distinctly postmaterialist social issues, federal electoral strategy and a weakened Labor party have driven a realignment on the centre-left of Australian politics substantial enough to transform the Senate party system. -
Download the Full Paper As
NSW Legislative Council Elections 1995 by Antony Green NSW PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICE Dr David Clune (230 2484), Manager Ms Honor Figgis (230 2768) Research Officer, Law Dr Gareth Griffith (230 2356) Senior Research Officer, Politics and Government Ms Fiona Manning (230 3085) Research Office, Law/Social Issues Mr Stewart Smith (230 2798) Research Officer, Environment/Science Ms Marie Swain (230 2003) Research Officer, Law Mr John Wilkinson (230 2006) Research Officer, Economics ISSN 1325-4456 ISBN O 7310 5953 0 © 1996 Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent from the Librarian, New South Wales Parliamentary Library, other than by Members of the New South Wales Parliament in the course of their official duties. The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the New South Wales Parliamentary Library. June 1996 Background Paper is published by the NSW Parliamentary Library The Author Antony Green is well known as the Election Analyst for ABC-Television, and has worked for the ABC on every state and federal election coverage since 1989. He also writes regularly on electoral matters for the Sydney Morning Herald. Antony studied at Sydney University, obtaining a Bachelor of Science in mathematics and computing, and a Bachelor of Economics with Honours in politics. He has produced previously a number of major studies on NSW elections for the Parliamentary Library. -
An Inquiry Into Contemporary Australian Extreme Right
THE OTHER RADICALISM: AN INQUIRY INTO CONTEMPORARY AUSTRALIAN EXTREME RIGHT IDEOLOGY, POLITICS AND ORGANIZATION 1975-1995 JAMES SALEAM A Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor Of Philosophy Department Of Government And Public Administration University of Sydney Australia December 1999 INTRODUCTION Nothing, except being understood by intelligent people, gives greater pleasure, than being misunderstood by blunderheads. Georges Sorel. _______________________ This Thesis was conceived under singular circumstances. The author was in custody, convicted of offences arising from a 1989 shotgun attack upon the home of Eddie Funde, Representative to Australia of the African National Congress. On October 6 1994, I appeared for Sentence on another charge in the District Court at Parramatta. I had been convicted of participation in an unsuccessful attempt to damage a vehicle belonging to a neo-nazi informer. My Thesis -proposal was tendered as evidence of my prospects for rehabilitation and I was cross-examined about that document. The Judge (whose Sentence was inconsequential) said: … Mr Saleam said in evidence that his doctorate [sic] of philosophy will engage his attention for the foreseeable future; that he has no intention of using these exertions to incite violence.1 I pondered how it was possible to use a Thesis to incite violence. This exercise in courtroom dialectics suggested that my thoughts, a product of my experiences in right-wing politics, were considered acts of subversion. I concluded that the Extreme Right was ‘The Other Radicalism’, understood by State agents as odorous as yesteryear’s Communist Party. My interest in Extreme Right politics derived from a quarter-century involvement therein, at different levels of participation. -
Chapter Five
5 2WKHULVVXHV Funding and disclosure Funding entitlements 5.1 Part XX of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (Electoral Act) provides for public funding of election campaigns to be made available to candidates and political parties who receive at least four per cent of the formal first preference vote. This funding ensures candidates are not disadvantaged in their appeal to electors or unduly influenced in their subsequent actions by lack of access to adequate funding. 5.2 Mr and Mrs Whitton, Mr Arthur Tuck and Mr Goldstiver call for the elimination of public funding to political parties for election campaigns.1 G W Spence and Mr Lockett suggest a restriction be placed on the amount that can be spent on election campaigns to reduce the amount of public funding necessary.2 5.3 The public funding entitlements for the 1998 federal election, including the Newcastle supplementary election, totalled $33,920,787.43. The funding rate was 162.210 cents per vote3 and this has been paid to party agents and independent candidates as shown in Table 5.1. 1 Submissions pp S592 (H&M.Whitton), S667 (M.Goldstiver) and S1844 (A.Tuck) 2 Submissions pp S214 (GW.Spence) and S632-S633 (E.Lockett) 3 Australian Electoral Commission. 1999. Electoral Pocket Book, Canberra, AEC, p 57. 124 Table 5.1 1998 election funding payments Payee Amount - $ Australian Labor Party 13,959,511.97 Liberal Party of Australia 11,488,881.15 National Party of Australia 2,321,589.02 Northern Territory Country Liberal Party 116,916.10 Australian Democrats 2,247,677.46 Australian Greens -
Richmond-Tweed Family History Society
Richmond-Tweed Family History Society Inc - Catalogue Call No Title Author Nv-1Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Aston Nv-2Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Ballarat Nn-15Y 1984 Electoral roll : Division of Banks Nn-14Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Barton Nt-1Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Bass Nv-3Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Batman Nv-4Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Bendigo Nn-12Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Berowra Nn-11Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Blaxland Ns-4Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Boothby Nq-1Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Bowman Nt-2Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Braddon Nn-16Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Bradfield Nw-1Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Brand Nq-2Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Brisbane Nv-5Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Bruce Nv-6Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Burke Nv-7Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Calwell Nw-2Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Canning Nq-3Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Capricornia Nv-8Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Casey Nn-17Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Charlton Nn-23Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Chifley Nv-9Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Chisholm 06 October 2012 Page 1 of 167 Call No Title Author Nn-22Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Cook Nv-10Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Corangamite Nv-11Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Corio Nw-3Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Cowan Nn-21Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Cowper Nn-20Y 1984 Electoral roll : division of Cunningham -
1998 Funding and Disclosure Election Report
AUSTRALIAN ELECTORAL COMMISSION FUNDING AND DISCLOSURE REPORT FOLLOWING THE FEDERAL ELECTION HELD ON 3 OCTOBER 1998 ISBN 0-642-70468-6 © Commonwealth of Australia 2000 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth available from Ausinfo. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Manager, Legislative Services, Ausinfo, GPO Box 1920, Canberra ACT 2601. Front cover design by the Spin Creative, Canberra Report printed by Union Offset Printers, Canberra CONTENTS Part 1 Introduction 1 Part 2 Election Funding 3 Part 3 Election Disclosure Returns Candidates and Senate groups 7 Third Parties 8 Broadcasters and Publishers 10 Part 4 Annual Disclosure Returns Political Parties 12 Associated Entities 13 Donors to Political Parties 15 Part 5 The Greenfields Foundation 17 Part 6 Compliance Audits 24 Part 7 Party Registration 27 Part 8 Summary of Recommendations 32 Appendix 1 Summary of Recommendations made in the 1996 35 Report Appendix 2 Election Funding Payments 38 Appendix 3 Third Parties 42 Appendix 4 Registered Political Parties 57 Funding and Disclosure Report - Election 1998 PART 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This report has been prepared by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) in accordance with subsection 17(2) of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918 (the Act). It reviews the operation of the election funding and financial disclosure schemes at the 3 October 1998 federal election and the 21 November 1998 Newcastle supplementary election. As usual, the opportunity is also taken to review the related operations of the annual disclosure scheme, disclosure compliance audits of political parties and their associated entities, and party registration. -
PARTY RULES? Dilemmas of Political Party Regulation in Australia
PARTY RULES? Dilemmas of political party regulation in Australia PARTY RULES? Dilemmas of political party regulation in Australia Edited by Anika Gauja and Marian Sawer Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Party rules? : dilemmas of political party regulation in Australia / editors: Anika Gauja, Marian Sawer. ISBN: 9781760460761 (paperback) 9781760460778 (ebook) Subjects: Political parties--Australia. Political parties--Law and legislation--Australia. Political participation--Australia. Australia--Politics and government. Other Creators/Contributors: Gauja, Anika, editor. Sawer, Marian, 1946- editor. Dewey Number: 324.2994 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press. This edition © 2016 ANU Press Contents Figures . vii Tables . ix Abbreviations . xi Acknowledgements . xiii Contributors . xv 1 . Party rules: Promises and pitfalls . 1 Marian Sawer and Anika Gauja 2 . Resisting legal recognition and regulation: Australian parties as rational actors? . 37 Sarah John 3 . Party registration and political participation: Regulating small and ‘micro’ parties . .73 Norm Kelly 4 . Who gets what, when and how: The politics of resource allocation to parliamentary parties . 101 Yvonne Murphy 5 . Putting the cartel before the house? Public funding of parties in Queensland . 123 Graeme Orr 6 . More regulated, more level? Assessing the impact of spending and donation caps on Australian State elections . -
Australian Left Review No. 116 April 1990
USTRA'LIAN LEFT REVIEW \ DENNIS ALTMAN AND WAYNE SWAN ON LABOR'S WIN TRAVELS WITH BOB CARR ^ONSUMPTIO^AX CLIVE JAMES Stimulating & intelligent book reviews, every month Sold nationally through select Bookshops & Newsagents $2.50 Subscriptions yearly $25.00 Airmail: NZ, $40, Pacific & SE Asia, $45 EDITIONS REVIEW PO Box 1558, Potts Point NSW 2011 Photo: Scott Wajon Mar 90 ALR CONTENTS BRIEFINGS DANUBE BLUES: Eastern Europe is marching to different economic drummers. 2 UNO’S DOUBLE TROUBLE: No future for Nicaragua's fragile democracy? 3 HOW GREEN WAS MY BALLOT: Who xvas who in the Green electoral zoo. 5 COLUMNS PROFILE: Clive James: too clever by half. 7 LETTER FROM EPHESUS: Henhouse Blues: Diana Simmonds cries fowl. 8 CHINA SHOP: Bob Carr recalls the East European revolution. vr h ■M LOAN 9 LETTERS; ALR goes conservative? 45 CONSUMING PASSIONS: - *r-> 1991 CD, qr not CD? j UNtv: * ' r 46 LOOSE CANNON: A bright union hope calls it quits. fASL BIRT lioftARr 47 DEAR DR. HARTMAN: Clichis can be fun 48 FEATURES WOMBS FOR RENT: Surrogacy has been draped in the respectability of science. But Janet Wright feels it's earned its shock-horror reputation. 12 A PROTECTION RACKET? The debate over protection has reopened. Sue McCreadie argues that Left protectionism is not enough. 16 PHEW1 Our cover story. Labor's record fourth election victory was a knife-edge thing. Dennis Altman argues that it makes the ALP one of the world's few dominant social democratic parties. David Burchell casts a critical eye on media and Left accounts of the 'sullen electorate'.