DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Elections 1993

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Department of the Parhamentary J Library Federal Elections 1993 • J.1~ 'oj,' :' ~ :: :+ /"" -.dh- :.=... ~.. ~.:: ~.J.r~ .... J~ -'~__ ~.. ~.~_L~~~~~~:L~~ o ~ r ISSN 1037-2938 ~., Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 1993 Except to the extent ofthe uses pennitted under the Cop)'rigbt Act 1968, no part ofthis publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including infonnation storage and retrieval system, without the prior written consent of the Department of the ParliamentaJy Library, other than by Members ofthe Australian Parliament in the course oftheir official duties. Published by the Department of the Parliamentery Library, 1993 / ) "I " Gerard Newman Andrew Kopras Statistics Group 8 October 1993 Parliamentary Research Service Background Paper Number 22 1993 Federal Elections 1993 Telephone: 06 2772480 Facsimile: 06 2772454 c '. c " This paper has been prepared for general distribution to Members ofthe Australian Parliament. Readers outside the Parliament are reminded that this is not an Australian Government document, but a paper prepared by the author and published by the Parliamentary Research Service to contribute to consideration ofthe issues by Senators and Members. The views expressed in this Paper are those oftha author and do not necessarily reflect those of the Parliamentary Research Service and are not to be attributed to the Department of the Parliamentary Library. CONTENTS Introduction 1 House ofRepresentatives ", Table 1 National Summary 3 c' 2 State Summary 4 3 Regional Summary 7 4 Party Status Summary 9 5a Electoral Division Summary: Number 13 5b Electoral Division Summary; Percent 17 6 Electoral Division Details 21 7 Two Party Preferred Vote, State Summary .46 8 Two Party Preferred Vote, Regional Summary .46 9 Two Party Preferred Vote, PartyStatus Summary .46 10 Two Party Preferred Vote, Electoral Division Summary .47 11 Electoral Pendulum 51 12 Electoral Divisions Ranked by Two Party Preferred Swing to ALP 52 Senate 13 National Summary 53 14 State Summary : 54 15 Composition After 1 July 1993 58 16 Candidate Details 59 17 Comparison ofSenate and House ofRepresentatives Votes 70 Appendices 1 Electoral Division Classification 73 2 House ofRepresentatives Elections 1949-1993 77 Federal Elections 1993 1 Introduction This paper contains an analysis of the results of the Senate and House ofRepresentatives elections held on 13 March 1993 and the supplementary election for the Division ofDickson held on 17 April 1993. The paper contains summary tables for both the Senate and the House of Representatives together with details for each House ofRepresentatives Electoral Division. The Regional and Party Status classifications used in the paper are the same as those used by the Australian Electoral Commission. Party Status is determined by the two party preferred vote at the 1990 elections adjusted for the effects ofthe 1991 Redistribution in New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania and the Australian Capital Territory. Electoral Divisions are classified according to the swing required for the party holding the Division to lose: "Safe" requires a swing ofover 10%; "Fairly Safe" requires a swing of 6% to 10%; "Marginal" requires a swing of less than 6%. Thus in Table 4 "Total ALP" shows the seats won and votes received by parties in Divisions classified as being held by the ALP before the 1993 election. Of these Divisions 71 were won by the ALP, 5 by the LP, 2 by the NP and 1 by Others, giving 79 Divisions in this category. In all tables first preference votes obtained by each candidate or party are expressed as a percentage of formal votes, formal and informal votes are expressed as a percentage oftotal votes and total votes are expressed as a percentage ofelectors enrolled. Final count votes and two party preferred votes are expressed as a percentage offormal votes less exhausted votes (exhausted votes are votes that show a clear first preference but do not show a clear subsequent preference, thus cannot be directed to candidates remaining in the count). The "Swing" figures compare votes obtained at the 1993 election with votes obtained at the 1990 election adjusted for the effects of the 1991 Redistribution. For detailed Electoral Division tables swing percentages will not necessarily add to zero because of the different range of candidates at the 1993 election compared with the 1990 election. Symbols nil or rounded to zero * sitting member \ 2 Federal Elections 1993 Abbreviations AFI Australians Against Further Immigration AIP Australia's Indigenous Peoples Party ALP Australian Labor Party ASG Abolish SelfGovernment Coalition ASP Australian Shooters Party CAP Confederate Action Party ofAustralia CCG Central Coast Greens (a) ,. CEG Citizens Electoral Councils ofAustralia cm Pensioner and Citizens Initiated Referendum Alliance· CLP Country Liberal Party CTA . Call to Australia DEM Australian Democrats DLP Democratic Labor Party EFF Independent EFF ESG Eastern Suburbs Greens (a) GA Green Alliance (a) GDA ACT Green Democratic Alliance (a) GLO Greens in Lowe (a) GRN The Greens (a) GRY Grey Power GSA Green Party South Australia (a) GWA The Greens (WA) (a) HAR Tasmanian Independent Senator Brian Harradine IND Independent JPI Janet Powell Independents' Network LAW Natural Law Party LP Liberal Party NP National Party QG Queensland Greens (a) RCG Richmond/Clarence Greens (a) RCL Rex Connor (Snr) Labor Party RPA Republician Party ofAustralia TG Tasmanian Greens (a) TST Tasmanian Senate Team VGA Victorian Green Alliance (a) WSG Western Suburbs Greens (a) (a) Defined as being "Greens" in summary tables. I Federal Elections 1993 3 TABLE 1 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: NATIONAL SUMMARY Australia Enrolled 11 384 638 Candidates Seats Won Votes Percent Swing Australian Labor Party 147 80 4751390 44.92 +5.49 Liberal Party 139 49 3888579 36.77 +2.01 National Party 46 16 758036 7.17 -1.25 Country Liberal Party 1 ·. 35207 0.33 +0.05 Australian Democrats 132 ·. 397060 3.75 -7.50 Natural Law Party 107 ·. 78577 0.74 +0.74 Confederate Action Party 33 ·. 60213 0.57 +0.57 Queensland Greens 25 ·. 58502 0.55 +0.55 The Greens fWA) 14 ·. 55907 0.53 -0.15 Call to Australia 39 · . 49467 0.47 -0.51 The Greens 12 ·. 41684 0.39 +0.15 Tasmanian Greens 5 ·. 24319 0.23 +0.17 Independent EFF 4 ·. 9954 0.09 Rex Connor (Snr) Labor Party 1 ·. 7083 0.07 -0.02 Eastern Suburbs Greens 1 ·. 4350 0.04 +0.04 Citizens Electoral Council 3 ·. 4198 0.04 Australia's Indigenous Peoples Party 10 ·. 4069 0.04 +0.04 Australians Against Further Immigration 4 ·. 3587 0.03 +0.03 ACT Green Democratic Alliance 1 ·. 3109 0.03 +0.03 Central Coast Green Party 1 ·. 2218 0.02 -0.02 Greens in Lowe 1 ·. 1827 0.02 -0.01 Richmond/Clarence Greens 1 ·. 1766 0.02 +0.02 Grey Power 2 ·. 1759 0.02 -0.20 Abolish SelfGovernment Coalition 1 ·. 1663 0.02 +0.02 Western Suburbs Greens 1 ·. 1524 0.01 +0.01 Green Party ofSouth Australia 1 ·. 1496 0.01 +0.01 Others 210 2 329235 3.11 -0.27 Formal 10576779 97.03 +0.22 Informal 324082 2.97 +0.22 Total 942 147 10900861 95.75 +0.43 \ 4 Federal Elections 1993 TABLE 2 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: STATE SUMMARY New South Wales Enrolled 3 814 932 Candidates Seats Won Votes Percent Swing ALP 50 33 1714512 48.32 +7.16 LP 45 8 1127291 31.77 +2.70 NP 15 8 346191 9.76 -1.50 DEM 37 ·. 99817 2.81 -7.40 GRN 11 ·. 38367 1.08 +0.84 LAW 37 ·. 23385 0.66 +0.66 CTA 16 ·. 21764 0.61 -0.03 EFF 3 ·. 9402 0.26 -0.01 . CAP 8 ·. 8524 0.24 +0.24 RCL 1 ·. 7083 0.20 -0.05 ESG 1 ·. 4350 0.12 +0.12 CCG 1 ·. 2218 0.06 -0.05 GLO 1 ·. 1827 0.05 -0.04 RCG 1 ·. 1766 0.05 +0.05 AFI 2 ·. 1732 0.05 +0.05 WSG 1 ·. 1524 0.04 +0.04 CEG 1 · . 439 0.01 +0.01 Others 78 1 138286 3.90 -2.81 Formal 3548478 96.90 +0.02 Informal 113664 3.10 -0.02 Total 309 50 3662142 95.99 +0.62 Victoria Enrolled 2 932 640 Candidates Seats Won Votes Percent Swin ALP 38 17 1273974 46.45 +9.38 LP 36 17 1102965 40.21 +0.53 NP 4 3 137470 5.01 -0.99 DEM 37 ·. 101185 3.69 -8.74 LAW 38 ·. 31529 1.15 +1.15 CTA 11 ·. 13289 0.48 -1.56 GRN 1 ·. 3317 0.12 +0.12 AFI 2 ·. 1855 0.07 +0.04 CEG 1 ·. 1027 0.04 -0.10 EFF 1 ·. 552 0.02 +0.02 Others 44 1 75652 2.76 +0.17 Formal 2742815 97.17 +0.72 Informal 79811 2.83 -0.72 Total 213 38 2822626 96.25 +0.57 I Federal Elections 1993 5 TABLE 2 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: STATE SUMMARY Queensland Enrolled 1 971 729 Candidates Seats Won Votes Percent Swiog ALP 25 13 739862 40.49 -1.11 LP 25 7 571226 31.26 +2.75 NP 25 5 269152 14.73 -2.03 DEM 25 ·. 74278 4.06 -7.53 QG 25 ·. 58502 3.20 +3.20 CAP 24 ·. 51565 2.82 +2.82 AlP 10 ·. 4069 0.22 +0.22 LAW 7 ·. 3547 0.19 +0.19 CEG 1 ·. 2732 0.15 +0.15 Others 38 ·. 52391 2.87 +1.33 Formal 1827324 97.38 -0.39 Informal 49135 2.62 +0.39 Total 205 25 1876459 95.17 +0.46 South Australia Enrolled 1 014 400 Candidates Seats Won Votes Percent Swing ALP 12 4 358707 38.83 +0.88 LP 12 8 421687 45.65 +3.00 NP 1 ·. 2878 0.31 +0.31 DEM 12 ·.
Recommended publications
  • Your Enrollment As a Voter

    Your Enrollment As a Voter

    YOUR ENROLLMENT AS A VOTER When you register to vote, you may choose to enroll in a political party or political designation or may choose to remain “unenrolled,” which is commonly referred to as independent. Choosing to Enroll in a Political Party: There are two political parties in Massachusetts: Democratic Party (D), (617) 776-2676 Republican Party (R), (617) 523-5005 If you enroll in either of these two parties you may vote only in that party’s primary. Enrollment in a political party does not affect your right to vote in the general election. In the general election, all voters receive the same ballot and vote for the candidate of their choice, regardless of party enrollment. Choosing No Enrollment in a Political Party: If you do not wish to enroll in a party, check the box next to “No Party (unenrolled)” on the voter registration form. If you do not enroll in a party, you may still vote in state and presidential primaries by choosing a party ballot and will remain unenrolled, which is commonly referred to as “independent.” Choosing to Enroll in a Political Designation: In addition to the two “political parties” listed above, there are certain legal political designations in which you can enroll. Currently these are: Conservative Party (A) Prohibition Party (P) Natural Law Party (B) American Independent Party (Q) New World Council (C) Socialist (S) Reform Party (E) Interdependent 3rd Party (T) Rainbow Coalition (F) America First Party (V) Green Party USA (G) Veterans Party America (W) We the People (H) Pirate (X) Constitution Party (K) World Citizens Party (Y) Green-Rainbow (J) Working Families (Z) Libertarian Party (L) Pizza Party (AA) Timesizing Not Downsizing (M) American Term Limits (BB) New Alliance Party (N) United Independent Party (CC) Massachusetts Independent Party (O) If you enroll in any political designation you may not vote in any state or presidential primary.
  • Federal Election 1996

    Federal Election 1996

    DEPARTMENT OF THE PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY Parliamentary Research Service Federal Elections 1996 Background Paper NO.6 1996-97 • ~ l '-\< ~.r /~( . ~__J .. ~r:_~'_r.T-rr-Ji,_.~:;~;.~:~~;:;;~~~5!~'~ ;aft~::.u...- ... ~ . ..x-"\.~. ~'d__~ 4 ...,,--.;." .. _"'J,.gp. ..... !:l,;:.1t ....... ISSN 1037-2938 © Copyrigbt Commonwealth of Australia 1996 Except to the extent of the uses pemtitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent of the Department of the Parliamentary Library, other than by Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official duties. Tbis paper bas been prepared for general distribution to Senators and Members of the Australian Parliament. Wbile great care is taken to ensure that the paper is accurate and balanced, the paper is written using information publicly available at the time of production. Tbe views expressed are those of the author and sbould not be attributed to the Parliamentary Researcb Service (PRS). Readers are reminded that the paper is not an official parliamentary or Australian government document. PRS staff are available to discuss the paper's contents with Senators and Members and their staff but not with members of the public. Publisbed by the Department of the Parliamentary Library, 1996 Parliamentary Research Service Federal Elections 1996 Gerard Newman Andrew Kopras Statistics Group 4 November 1996 Background Paper No.6 1996-97 Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Brien Hallett, Australian Electoral Commission, and JanPearson for their assistance in preparing this paper.
  • House of Representatives By-Elections 1901–2014

    House of Representatives By-Elections 1901–2014

    RESEARCH PAPER SERIES, 2017–18 5 MARCH 2018 House of Representatives by-elections: 1901–2017 Stephen Barber Statistics and Mapping Section Executive summary This paper provides details of House of Representatives by-elections, from that held for Darling Downs on 14 September 1901 to the most recent held on 16 December 2017 for Bennelong. The following observations can be made about those by-elections: • there have been 151 by-elections, an average of 3.4 per parliament • the average number of nominations has grown over the years from 2.2 per by-election to 12.0 per by- election • in only four cases was a by-election contested by just a single candidate • an increasing tendency has been for governments to avoid contesting by-elections in their opponents’ safe seats • in only ten cases have the opposition party failed to contest a by-election • seventy-six of the by-elections followed the resignation of the member, 68 members died in office, there have been six voided elections, and one MP was expelled from the House • since 1949 resignations account for almost two-thirds of by-elections and over half the resignations have occurred in safe seats • on 35 occasions the party complexion of a seat has altered at a by-election • five of the losses have been by the opposition of the day • the average two-party preferred swing against the government of the day has been 3.8 per cent • since 1949 the largest two-party swing against a government occurred against Labor in Canberra in 1995. The largest swing to a government occurred to the Coalition in McPherson in 1981.
  • Newsletter [2018] No 9, 8 November 2018

    Newsletter [2018] No 9, 8 November 2018

    NEWSLETTER [2018] No. 09 2018 ANNUAL ESSAY PRIZE Dr Nuncio d’Angelo Professor Gino Dal Pont The winner of the Academy’s Annual essay Prize Mr Russell Miller AM for 2018 is Ms Ashleigh Mills, who is a solicitor Dame Sian Elias GNZM PC QC and members of the employed at Holding Redlich in Sydney. Academy at the AGM The prize (of $10,000) will be presented to Ms Mills at the Academy’s book launch event to be held on 28 November (see under “Forthcoming Events” below). The Academy is much indebted to the Judging Panel comprising Professor the Hon William Gummow AC QC (Chair), Ms Kate Eastman SC and Professor James Stellios for their work in judging the essays. As was noted at the Annual General Meeting, Professor Croucher did not stand again for the ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING office of Director due to her having assumed the The annual general meeting of the Academy was role of Chair of the Asia Pacific Forum of held at the Federal Court in Melbourne National Human Rights Institutions (in addition immediately prior to the Patron’s Address at the to her responsibilities as President of the same location (see under “RECENT EVENTS” Australian Human Rights Commission). The below). President noted with thanks the indebtedness of the Academy to Professor Croucher for the The following were elected as directors and to major contribution that she has made as a the particular offices where shown Director. The meeting welcomed as a new Director Professor Gino Dal Pont of the President University of Tasmania Law School.
  • The Politico's Guide to Electoral Reform in Britain

    The Politico's Guide to Electoral Reform in Britain

    Patrick Dunleavy, Helen Margetts and Stuart Weir The Politico's guide to electoral reform in Britain Book section Original citation: Originally published in Dunleavy, Patrick, Margetts, Helen and Weir, Stuart (1998) The Politico's guide to electoral reform in Britain. Politico's Publishing, London, UK. ISBN 190230120X © Democratic Audit This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/62253/ Available in LSE Research Online: June 2015 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. the Guide to ELECTORAL REFORM in Britain Patrick Dunleavy, Helen Margetts and Stuart Weir First published in Great Britain 1998 by Politico’s Publishing 8 Artillery Row London SW1P 1RZ England Telephone 0171 931 0090 Email [email protected] Website http://www.politicos.co.uk Copyright Patrick Dunleavy, Helen Margetts and Stuart Weir 1998 The right of Patrick Dunleavy, Helen Margetts and Stuart Weir to be identified as authors of this work has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British library ISBN 190230120X Printed and bound in Great Britain by Colourworks Typesetting and cover design by Tony Garrett All rights reserved.
  • 'His Excellency'

    'His Excellency'

    AROUND TOWN No.151 Autumn 2012 ISSN 0159 3285 ISSN ’His Excellency’ The Hon Alex Chernov AC QC Governor of the State of Victoria 1 VICTORIAN BAR NEWS No. 151 Autumn 2012 Editorial 2 The Editors - Victorian Bar News Continues 3 Chairman’s Cupboard - At the Coalface: A Busy and Productive 2012 News and Views 4 From Vilnius to Melbourne: The Extraordinary Journey of The Hon Alex Chernov AC QC 8 How We Lead 11 Clerking System Review 12 Bendigo Law Association Address 4 8 16 Opening of the 2012 Legal Year 19 The New Bar Readers’ Course - One Year On 20 The Bar Exam 20 Globe Trotters 21 The Courtroom Dog 22 An Uncomfortable Discovery: Legal Process Outsourcing 25 Supreme Court Library 26 Ethics Committee Bulletins Around Town 28 The 2011 Bar Dinner 35 The Lineage and Strength of Our Traditions 38 Doyle SC Finally Has Her Say! 42 Farewell to Malkanthi Bowatta (DeSilva) 12 43 The Honourable Justice David Byrne Farewell Dinner 47 A Philanthropic Bar 48 AALS-ABCC Lord Judge Breakfast Editors 49 Vicbar Defeats the Solicitors! Paul Hayes, Richard Attiwill and Sharon Moore 51 Bar Hockey VBN Editorial Committee 52 Real Tennis and the Victorian Bar Paul Hayes, Richard Attiwill and Sharon Moore (Editors), Georgina Costello, Anthony 53 Wigs and Gowns Regatta 2011 Strahan (Deputy Editors), Ben Ihle, Justin Tomlinson, Louise Martin, Maree Norton and Benjamin Jellis Back of the Lift 55 Quarterly Counsel Contributors The Hon Chief Justice Warren AC, The Hon Justice David Ashley, The Hon Justice Geoffrey 56 Silence All Stand Nettle, Federal Magistrate Phillip Burchardt, The Hon John Coldrey QC, The Hon Peter 61 Her Honour Judge Barbara Cotterell Heerey QC, The Hon Neil Brown QC, Jack Fajgenbaum QC, John Digby QC, Julian Burnside 63 Going Up QC, Melanie Sloss SC, Fiona McLeod SC, James Mighell SC, Rachel Doyle SC, Paul Hayes, 63 Gonged! Richard Attiwill, Sharon Moore, Georgia King-Siem, Matt Fisher, Lindy Barrett, Georgina 64 Adjourned Sine Die Costello, Maree Norton, Louise Martin and James Butler.
  • Town Clerk's Office

    Town Clerk's Office

    Town Clerk’s Office Town Hall Room 12 52 Main Street • Milford, MA 01757 Ph: (508) 634-2307 • Fax: (508) 634-2324 [email protected] Amy E. Hennessy Neves, Town Clerk What’s Happening Now at the Town Clerk’s Office: Important Reminders for the 2018 September Primary The deadline to register to vote for the Primary or Change your Political Party affiliation is Wednesday August 15th by 8:00 p.m. The deadline to apply for and vote by absentee in person is Friday August 31st by 5:00 p.m. If you need to apply for an application by mail and/or need a ballot send to you by mail, you must do so as soon as possible to allow for mailing time. Democratic Political Party-Voter can ONLY receive this ballot at the Primary D Party Election Republican Political Party-voter can ONLY receive this ballot at the Primary R Party Election Political Party-Voter can ONLY receive this ballot at the Primary Libertarian Party L Election WHO Can Vote in the September Primary? In Massachusetts, registered voters may choose to (1) enroll in a political party; (2) enroll with a political designation; or (3) choose to be an “unenrolled” voter (i.e., an “independent”). Voters may change their enrollment status with their election official, with a deadline twenty days before an election. All registered voters may vote in General Elections. Massachusetts voters enrolled in a particular Political PARTY may vote only in that party's primary, and cannot cross-over to vote in another party's primary, but "Unenrolled" voters may cast a primary ballot for one of the three parties.
  • Federal Elections 1990

    Federal Elections 1990

    t/-<-c-~ The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia Federal Elections 1990 Gerard Newman Andrew Kopras Background Paper 20 July 1990 Parliamentary Research Service Department of the Parliamentary Library ISSN 10~'07 Copyright Commonwealth of Australia 1990 Except to the extent of the usee permitted under the Copyright Act 1968. no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including informltion storage and retrieval system, without the prior written consent of the Department of the Parliamentary Ubrary, other than by Members of the Australian Parliament in the course of their official duties. Published by the Department of the Parliamentary Ubrary, 1990 Federal Elections 1090 Contents Table Title Page Introduction'" ..... .. ....... .. .......... .. .. .. •. ... ... ... .. ... .. 1 House of Representatives 1 National Summary 3 2 State Summary 4 3 Regional Summary 7 4 Party Status Summary 9 Sa Electoral Division Summary: Number 13 5b Electoral Division Summary: Percent........................... 17 6 Electoral Division Details 21 7 Two Party Preferred Vote. State Summary 46 8 Two Party Preferred Vote. Regional Summary 46 9 Two Party Preferred Vote. Party Status Summary 47 10 Two Party Preferred Vote by Electoral Division 48 11a Electoral Divisions Ranked by Two Party Preferred Vote: ALP Seats 52 11b Electoral Divisions Ranked by Two Party Preferred Vote: L1B/NP Seats 53 12 Electoral Divisions Ranked by Two Party Preferred Swing to L1B/NP 54 Senate 13 National Summary 55 14 State Summary ;................................. 56 15 Composition After 1 July 1990 59 16 Candidate Details 60 Appendix 1: Electoral Division Classification 70 Appendix 2: House of Representatives Elections 1949 to 1990 '" 74 Federal Elections 1990 1 INTRODUCTION This paper contains an analysis of voting in the Senate and House of Representatives elections held on 24 March 1990.
  • Umass' Resident Assistants Unionize

    Umass' Resident Assistants Unionize

    An Associated Collegiate Press Pacemaker Award Winner • THE • Barry Manilow takes the Diver qualifies for NCA stage, Championships, Bl B8 Non-Profit Org. 250 Student Center • University of Delaware • Newark, DE 19716 U.S. Postage Paid Thesday & Friday Newark, DE Permit No. 26 FREE \'olumt• 128, Issue -tO www.n·,·iew.udel.edu Tucsda~. :\larch 19. 2002 ·clinton aide to discuss race UMass' BY AMIE VOITH Edley said his speech would be programs. Administrative New.<Editor relevant to people who expect to He said he helped Clinton Christopher Edley, special counsel live, work or lead lives in formulate his "Mend it, don't end it" to former President Bill Clinton, will resident communities with people different position in 1995, which effectively discuss his views on affirmative from themselves, which pertains to killed a threat in Congress at the action and racial injustice at the almost everyone in a diverse society. time to repeal Affirmative Action university's annual Louis Redding "If you are planning to live with programs. Diversity Lecture Thursday at 7 p.m. the white militia in the wilderness of Edley recently published "Not All assistants in 140 Smith Hall. Idaho, this won't be news you can Black & White: Affirmative Action, Using affirmative action as a use," be said. Race and American Values." • • central example, Edley will focus on Edley is currently an He said he is also proud of his its effects on a wide range of issues, administrative law professor at work during the Carter including law, social science, public UniOnize Harvard University, where he is the Administration in which he invented policy, values and politics.
  • House of Representatives By-Elections 1901-2005

    House of Representatives By-Elections 1901-2005

    Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services Parliamentary Library RESEARCH BRIEF Information analysis and advice for the Parliament 16 August 2005, no. 1, 2005–06, ISSN 1832-2883 House of Representatives by-elections 1901–2005 The first part of this revised brief discusses the 141 by-elections for the House of Representatives since Federation, including the most recent for the New South Wales division of Werriwa. The brief’s appendices give a full set of by-election figures. Gerard Newman, Statistics Section Scott Bennett, Politics and Public Administration Section Contents Party abbreviations ................................................... 1 Executive summary ................................................... 2 Contests ......................................................... 2 Causes .......................................................... 2 Outcomes ........................................................ 2 The organisation of Commonwealth by-elections.............................. 3 The reasons why by-elections have been held .............................. 3 The timing of by-elections ............................................ 4 By-elections 1994–05 ............................................. 5 Vacancies for which no by-election was held 1901–2005 ................... 6 Number of nominations .............................................. 6 Candidates per by-election ......................................... 7 Voter turnout ..................................................... 7 Party performance ...................................................
  • Newsletter [2021] No

    Newsletter [2021] No

    NEWSLETTER [2021] No. 5 l 2 8 May 2021 Welcome to the fifth Newsletter for 2021. committee. The committee has met to plan how we may First Nations Scholarship implement this scheme. The details of this inaugural award are on the website. The idea is to establish a system whereby (generally) The second phase of the project was to find a Fellow junior academics may spend a day or two with a judge as mentor for the winner and Fellows as mentors for to gain, or renew, firsthand experience of how a court the other shortlisted applicants. This has been runs. Chief Justices and other heads of jurisdiction achieved. There is also a mentor for each of the other will need to be consulted. applicants. I am most grateful to those who have A proposal for a pilot scheme will go before the volunteered. It should be a rewarding experience, on Board shortly. both sides. 2021 AAL Essay Prize Forthcoming Events Please bring this competition to the attention of Dinner in Hobart, Tasmania, Thursday 10 June anyone who may be interested in submitting an essay. 2021 at 7 PM Fellows (other than Directors) may wish to If you will be in Hobart on 10 June 2021 and wish to participate themselves. attend, please notify the Secretariat as soon as Each year since the Essay Prize was established in possible: [email protected] 2015, the winning essay has been published in the Partners are invited. Australian Law Journal. The format will be an after-dinner speech by the new The essay topic for this year is: Dean of the Faculty of Law of the University of “Outstanding fundamental issues for First Nations Peoples in Tasmania, Professor Michael Australia: what can lawyers contribute to the current debates Stuckey.
  • Download the Full Paper As

    Download the Full Paper As

    NSW Legislative Council Elections 1995 by Antony Green NSW PARLIAMENTARY LIBRARY RESEARCH SERVICE Dr David Clune (230 2484), Manager Ms Honor Figgis (230 2768) Research Officer, Law Dr Gareth Griffith (230 2356) Senior Research Officer, Politics and Government Ms Fiona Manning (230 3085) Research Office, Law/Social Issues Mr Stewart Smith (230 2798) Research Officer, Environment/Science Ms Marie Swain (230 2003) Research Officer, Law Mr John Wilkinson (230 2006) Research Officer, Economics ISSN 1325-4456 ISBN O 7310 5953 0 © 1996 Except to the extent of the uses permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means including information storage and retrieval systems, without the prior written consent from the Librarian, New South Wales Parliamentary Library, other than by Members of the New South Wales Parliament in the course of their official duties. The views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the New South Wales Parliamentary Library. June 1996 Background Paper is published by the NSW Parliamentary Library The Author Antony Green is well known as the Election Analyst for ABC-Television, and has worked for the ABC on every state and federal election coverage since 1989. He also writes regularly on electoral matters for the Sydney Morning Herald. Antony studied at Sydney University, obtaining a Bachelor of Science in mathematics and computing, and a Bachelor of Economics with Honours in politics. He has produced previously a number of major studies on NSW elections for the Parliamentary Library.