U.S. Intelligence Law

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

U.S. Intelligence Law . n 2011 Administrative Law Supplement for U.S. Intelligence Law DAVID ALAN JORDAN This Document is in the Public Domain. No Rights Reserved. 2011 Administrative Law Supplement for U.S. Intelligence Law (November 2011) By David Alan Jordan Editor-in-Chief/Principal Lecturer IntelligenceLaw.com IntelligenceLaw.com Creative Commons Supplement Series United States of America, 2011 _______________________________ Page 2 To the Center for Democracy & Technology and OpenCRS.com [www.cdt.org & http://opencrs.com] _______________________________ Page 3 Preface This supplement contains the administrative rules most relevant to the courses on IntelligenceLaw.com. Specifically, this supplement contains a selection of presidential orders, agency directives, administrative guidelines, and court rules that govern domestic intelligence operations affecting United States persons. This publication is a work in progress. A more comprehensive second edition is scheduled for release in 2012. DAVID ALAN JORDAN November, 2011 _______________________________ Page 4 Summary of Contents Preface ____________________________________________ 4 Summary of Contents __________________________________ 5 Table of Contents _____________________________________ 6 I. PRESIDENTIAL RULES ______________________________ 18 Executive Order 12,333: United States Intelligence Activities ________ 19 Executive Order 12,949: Foreign Intelligence Physical Searches ______ 46 Executive Order 13,526: Classified National Security Information ___ 48 Executive Order 12,958: Classified National Security Information (Superseded) _________________________________________ 88 II. AGENCY RULES __________________________________ 112 Department of Defense Regulation 5240.1-R: Procedures Governing the Activities of DOD Intelligence Components that Affect United States Persons _____________________________________________ 113 Department of Defense Directive 5240.01 ____________________ 169 The Attorney General’s Guidelines for Domestic FBI Operations ____ 175 III. COURT RULES __________________________________ 214 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court Rules _________________ 215 Appendix to the FISA Court Rules: Procedures for Review of Petitions Filed Pursuant to Section 501(F) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court Act of 1978 ______________________________________ 223 Alien Terrorist Removal Court Rules ________________________ 230 _______________________________ Page 5 Table of Contents Preface ____________________________________________ 4 Summary of Contents __________________________________ 5 Table of Contents _____________________________________ 6 I. PRESIDENTIAL RULES ______________________________ 18 Executive Order 12,333: United States Intelligence Activities ________ 19 Preamble _______________________________________________________ 20 PART 1: Goals, Directions, Duties, and Responsibilities with Respect to United States Intelligence Efforts ________________________________________________ 20 1.1 Goals ______________________________________________________ 20 1.2 The National Security Council _____________________________________ 21 (a) Purpose ____________________________________________________ 21 (b) Covert Action and Other Sensitive Intelligence Operations _________________ 21 1.3 Director of National Intelligence ___________________________________ 21 1.4 The Intelligence Community ______________________________________ 28 1.5 Duties and Responsibilities of the Heads of Executive Branch Departments and Agencies ______________________________________________________ 29 1.6 Heads of Elements of the Intelligence Community _______________________ 30 1.7 Intelligence Community Elements __________________________________ 31 (a) THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY ___________________________ 31 (b) THE DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY ___________________________ 32 (c) THE NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY _______________________________ 32 (d) THE NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE ________________________ 33 (e) THE NATIONAL GEOSPATIAL-INTELLIGENCE AGENCY ________________ 33 (f) THE INTELLIGENCE AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ELEMENTS OF THE ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE, AND MARINE CORPS ______________________________ 34 (g) INTELLIGENCE ELEMENTS OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 34 (h) THE INTELLIGENCE AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE ELEMENTS OF THE COAST GUARD ______________________________________________________ 34 (i) THE BUREAU OF INTELLIGENCE AND RESEARCH, DEPARTMENT OF STATE; THE OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE AND ANALYSIS, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY; THE OFFICE OF NATIONAL SECURITY INTELLIGENCE, DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION; THE OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE AND ANALYSIS, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; AND THE OFFICE OF INTELLIGENCE AND COUNTERINTELLIGENCE, DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ___ 35 (j) THE OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE __________ 35 1.8 The Department of State ________________________________________ 35 1.9 The Department of the Treasury ___________________________________ 36 1.10 The Department of Defense _____________________________________ 36 1.11 The Department of Homeland Security ______________________________ 37 1.12 The Department of Energy ______________________________________ 37 _______________________________ Page 6 1.13 The Federal Bureau of Investigation ________________________________ 37 Part 2: Conduct of Intelligence Activities __________________________________ 38 2.1 Need ______________________________________________________ 38 2.2 Purpose ___________________________________________________ 38 2.3 Collection of Information ________________________________________ 38 2.4 Collection Techniques __________________________________________ 39 2.5 Attorney General Approval ______________________________________ 40 2.6 Assistance to Law Enforcement and other Civil Authorities _________________ 40 2.7 Contracting _________________________________________________ 41 2.8 Consistency with Other Laws _____________________________________ 41 2.9 Undisclosed Participation in Organizations within the United States __________ 41 2.10 Human Experimentation _______________________________________ 42 2.11 Prohibition on Assassination _____________________________________ 42 2.12 Indirect Participation _________________________________________ 42 2.13 Limitation on Covert Action _____________________________________ 42 Part 3: General Provisions ___________________________________________ 42 3.1 Congressional Oversight ________________________________________ 42 3.2 Implementation ______________________________________________ 42 3.3 Procedures _________________________________________________ 43 3.4 References and Transition _______________________________________ 43 3.5 Definitions _________________________________________________ 43 3.6 Revocation _________________________________________________ 45 3.7 General Provisions ____________________________________________ 45 Executive Order 12,949: Foreign Intelligence Physical Searches ______ 46 Section 1______________________________________________________ 46 Section 2 _____________________________________________________ 46 Section 3 _____________________________________________________ 46 Executive Order 13,526: Classified National Security Information ___ 48 Preamble _______________________________________________________ 50 Part 1—Original Classification _________________________________________ 50 Sec. 1.1. Classification Standards _____________________________________ 50 Sec. 1.2. Classification Levels _______________________________________ 51 Sec. 1.3. Classification Authority _____________________________________ 51 Sec. 1.4. Classification Categories ____________________________________ 53 Sec. 1.5. Duration of Classification ____________________________________ 53 Sec. 1.6. Identification and Markings __________________________________ 54 Sec. 1.7. Classification Prohibitions and Limitations ________________________ 55 Sec. 1.8. Classification Challenges ____________________________________ 57 Sec. 1.9. Fundamental Classification Guidance Review ______________________ 57 Part 2—Derivative Classification _______________________________________ 58 Sec. 2.1. Use of Derivative Classification ________________________________ 58 Sec. 2.2. Classification Guides _______________________________________ 59 Part 3—Declassification and Downgrading ________________________________ 59 Sec. 3.1. Authority for Declassification _________________________________ 59 Sec. 3.2. Transferred Records _______________________________________ 61 Sec. 3.3. Automatic Declassification ___________________________________ 61 Sec. 3.4. Systematic Declassification Review _____________________________ 66 Sec. 3.5. Mandatory Declassification Review _____________________________ 66 Sec. 3.6. Processing Requests and Reviews ______________________________ 68 Sec. 3.7. National Declassification Center _______________________________ 69 Part 4--Safeguarding _______________________________________________ 70 Sec. 4.1. General Restrictions on Access ________________________________ 70 Sec. 4.2. Distribution Controls ______________________________________ 72 Sec. 4.3. Special Access Programs ____________________________________ 73 _______________________________ Page 7 Sec. 4.4. Access by Historical Researchers and Certain Former Government Personnel 74 Part 5—Implementation and Review ____________________________________ 75 Sec. 5.1. Program Direction ________________________________________ 75 Sec. 5.2. Information Security Oversight Office ___________________________
Recommended publications
  • Directors of Central Intelligence As Leaders of the U.S
    All statements of fact, opinion, or analysis expressed in this book are those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect official positions of the Central Intel- ligence Agency or any other US government entity, past or present. Nothing in the contents should be construed as asserting or implying US government endorsement of the authors’ factual statements and interpretations. The Center for the Study of Intelligence The Center for the Study of Intelligence (CSI) was founded in 1974 in response to Director of Central Intelligence James Schlesinger’s desire to create within CIA an organization that could “think through the functions of intelligence and bring the best intellects available to bear on intelli- gence problems.” The Center, comprising professional historians and experienced practitioners, attempts to document lessons learned from past operations, explore the needs and expectations of intelligence consumers, and stimulate serious debate on current and future intelligence challenges. To support these activities, CSI publishes Studies in Intelligence and books and monographs addressing historical, operational, doctrinal, and theoretical aspects of the intelligence profession. It also administers the CIA Museum and maintains the Agency’s Historical Intelligence Collection. Comments and questions may be addressed to: Center for the Study of Intelligence Central Intelligence Agency Washington, DC 20505 Printed copies of this book are available to requesters outside the US government from: Government Printing Office (GPO) Superintendent of Documents P.O. Box 391954 Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954 Phone: (202) 512-1800 E-mail: [email protected] ISBN: 1-929667-14-0 The covers: The portraits on the front and back covers are of the 19 directors of central intelligence, beginning with the first, RAdm.
    [Show full text]
  • American Intelligence Journal Vol 34
    AMERICAN INTELLIGENCE JOURNAL THE MAGAZINE FOR INTELLIGENCE PROFESSIONALS The Cyber Threat: The Future of Intelligence in a Wired World __NMIF__________________________ Vol. 34, No. 1, 2017 American THE MAGAZINE FOR INTELLIGENCE PROFESSIONALS Intelligence Journal Vol. 34, No. 1 2017 ISSN 0883-072X NMIF Board of Directors LTG (USA, Ret) Mary A. Legere, Chair Col (USAF, Ret) John Clark, President Col (USAF, Ret) William Arnold, Vice President Col (USAF, Ret) Michael Grebb, Treasurer Col (USAF, Ret) Carla Bass, Director LTC (USA, Ret) Steve Iwicki, Director Mr. Don Bolser, Director Dr. (Col, USAF, Ret) Eva S. Jenkins CDR (USNR, Ret) Calland Carnes, Director Capt (USNR, Ret) Stephanie Leung, Director Mr. Dennis DeMolet, Director Kel McClanahan, Esq., Director Lt Col (USAF, Ret) James Eden, Director Brad Moss, Esq., Director COL (USA, Ret) Michael Ferguson, Director Capt (USNR) Rick Myllenbeck, Director Col (USAF, Ret) Owen Greenblatt CDR (USNR) Louis Tucker, Director COL (USA, Ret) David Hale, Director COL (USA, Ret) Gerald York, Director Editor - COL (USA, Ret) William C. Spracher, Ed.D. Production Manager - Ms. Debra Hamby-Davis Brig Gen (USAF, Ret) Scott Bethel, Director Emeritus Dr. Forrest R. Frank, Director Emeritus MajGen (USMC, Ret) Michael Ennis, Director Emeritus LTG (USA, Ret) Patrick M. Hughes, Director Emeritus Col (USAF, Ret) William Huntington, Director Emeritus The American Intelligence Journal (AIJ) is published by the National Military Intelligence Foundation (NMIF), a non-profit, non-political foundation supporting American intelligence professionals and the U.S. Intelligence Community, primarily through educational means. NMIF believes in the power of the intelligence mission to inspire young people to join the intelligence profession as a career of service to the nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 108 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 108 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 150 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2004 No. 139 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Tuesday, January 4, 2005, at 12 noon. Senate WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2004 The Senate met at 9:30 a.m. and was generations. Thank You for Your pro- ple with issues and wisdom to seek called to order by the President pro tection. You make wars to cease, de- Your guidance. tempore (Mr. STEVENS). stroying the weapons of those who Bless and strengthen the many staff- fight against Your purposes. Today, ers who provide the wind beneath the PRAYER guide our lawmakers with Your justice wings of our leaders. Bring to them a The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- and keep them as the apple of Your bountiful harvest for their many fered the following prayer: eye. Instruct them in Your wisdom and months of faithful toil. Let us pray. hide them under the shadow of Your Bless all who mourn the loss of Stan Faithful God, who stretches out the wings. Help them to find light in Your Kimmitt. He will be greatly missed. Earth above the waters, Your Name is laws and knowledge in Your instruc- We pray this in Your holy Name. great and Your goodness extends to all tions. Give them patience as they grap- Amen. NOTICE If the 108th Congress, 2d Session, adjourns sine die on or before December 10, 2004, a final issue of the Congres- sional Record for the 108th Congress, 2d Session, will be published on Monday, December 20, 2004, in order to permit Members to revise and extend their remarks.
    [Show full text]
  • Allen Dulles: Reluctant Manager
    All statements of fact, opinion, or analysis expressed in this book are those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect official positions of the Central Intel- lig ence Agency or any other US government entity, past or present. Nothing in the contents should be construed as asserting or implying US government endorsement of the authors’ factual statements and interpretations. Th e Center for the Study of Intelligence The Center for the Study of Intelligence (CSI) was founded in 1974 in response to Director of Central Intelligence James Schlesinger’s desire to create within CIA an organization that could “think through the functions of intelligence and bring the best intellects available to bear on intelli- gence problems.” The Center, comprising professional historians and experienced practitioners, attempts to document lessons learned from past operations, explore the needs and expectations of intelligence consumers, and stimulate serious debate on current and future intelligence challenges. To support these activities, CSI publishes Studies in Intelligence and books and monographs addressing historical, operational, doctrinal, and theoretical aspects of the intelligence profession. It also administers the CIA Museum and maintains the Agency’s Historical Intelligence Collection. Comments and questions may be addressed to: Center for the Study of Intelligence Central Intelligence Agency Washington, DC 20505 Printed copies of this book are available to requesters outside the US government from: Government Printing Office (GPO) Superintendent of Documents P.O. Box 391954 Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954 Phone: (202) 512-1800 E-mail: [email protected] ISBN: 1-929667-14-0 The covers: The portraits on the front and back covers are of the 19 directors of central intelligence, beginning with the first, RAdm.
    [Show full text]
  • Bansemer: Intelligence Reform: a Question of Balance
    Brig Gen Kenneth Newton Walker Kenneth Walker enlisted at Denver, Colorado, on 15 December 1917. He took flying training at Mather Field, California, getting his commission and wings in November 1918. After a tour in the Philippines, he returned to Langley Field, Virginia, in February 1925 with a subsequent assignment in December 1928 to attend the Air Corps Tactical School. Retained on the faculty as a bombardment in- structor, Walker became the epitome of the strategic thinkers at the school and coined the revolutionary airpower “creed of the bomber”: “A well-planned, well-organized and well-flown air force attack will constitute an offensive that cannot be stopped.” Following attendance at the Command and General Staff School at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, in 1933 and promotion to major, he served for three years at Hamilton Field, California, and another three years at Luke Field, Ford Island, and Wheeler Field, Hawaii. Walker returned to the United States in January 1941 as assistant chief of the Plans Division for the chief of the Air Corps in Washington, DC. He was promoted to lieutenant colonel in July 1941 and colonel in March 1942. During this time, when he worked in the Operations Division of the War Department General Staff, he coauthored the air-campaign strategy known as Air War Plans Division—Plan 1, the plan for organizing, equipping, deploying, and employing the Army Air Forces to defeat Germany and Japan should the United States become embroiled in war. The authors completed this monu- mental undertaking in less than one month, just before Japan attacked Pearl Harbor—and the United States was, in fact, at war.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends and Predictions in Foreign Intelligence Surveillance 3
    A HOOVER INSTITUTION ESSAY Trends and Predictions in Foreign Intelligence Surveillance THE FAA AND BEYOND DAVID S. KRIS Aegis Paper Series No. 1601 It is a strange time for national security. Beginning in 2013, Edward Snowden’s leaks caused the US government to significantly reduce the scope, and increase the transparency, of its foreign intelligence surveillance, while the president urged caution and restraint in response to the extraordinary rise of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL). At the same time, US communications providers sought additional reforms and reduced their cooperation with surveillance directives in important cases. Finally, anti-surveillance politicians, on the right and left of the US political spectrum, prospered as part of a burgeoning populist movement. In Western Europe, by contrast, ISIL’s rise spurred a significant and overt expansion of surveillance authorities. European governments, particularly the United Kingdom, began National Security, Technology, and Law and Technology, Security, National making increasingly strident demands for communications data from US providers. And the European Union struck down the safe-harbor regime for trans-Atlantic data sharing on the grounds that US surveillance laws do not adequately protect privacy. Despite increased transparency, as of January 2016, the immense technical and legal complexity of US surveillance law continues to challenge informed debate across all of these fronts. In this highly charged and confused environment, Congress will soon take up the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Amendments Act (FAA), which is set to expire at the end of 2017. I make six predictions about the issues likely to dominate that legislative process.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends and Predictions in Foreign Intelligence Surveillance: the FAA and Beyond
    ARTICLES Trends and Predictions in Foreign Intelligence Surveillance: The FAA and Beyond David S. Kris* It is a strange time for national security. Beginning in 2013, Edward Snowden’s leaks caused the U.S. government to significantly reduce the scope, and in- crease the transparency, of its foreign intelligence surveillance, while the president urged caution and restraint in response to the extraordinary rise of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL). At the same time, U.S. communi- cations providers sought additional reforms and reduced their cooperation with surveillance directives in important cases. Finally, anti-surveillance politicians, on the right and left of the U.S. political spectrum, prospered as part of a burgeoning populist movement. In Western Europe, by contrast, ISIL’s rise spurred a significant and overt expansion of surveillance authorities. European governments, particularly the United Kingdom, began making increasingly strident demands for communications data from U.S. providers. And the Euro- pean Union struck down the safe-harbor regime for trans-Atlantic data sharing on the grounds that U.S. surveillance laws do not adequately protect privacy. Despite increased transparency, as of January 2016, the immense technical and legal complexity of U.S. surveillance law continues to challenge informed debate across all of these fronts. In this highly charged and confused environment, Congress will soon take up the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Amendments Act (FAA), which is set to expire at the end of 2017. I make six predictions about the issues likely to dominate that legislative process. Most of those issues concern incremental change, and a range of possible outcomes well within existing legal and policy * David S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Way Forward
    Information Sharing in the 21st Century The Way Forward REPORT TO THE MARKLE FOUNDATION OF THE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY CAPSTONE TEAM May 2012 A Project of School of International & Public Affairs Columbia University New York, New York [This page is intentionally left blank] INFORMATION SHARING IN THE 21ST CENTURY: THE WAY FORWARD 1 Table of Contents Overview ...............................................................................................................................5 Disclaimer ............................................................................................................................6 Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................6 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................7 Introduction .......................................................................................................................13 Information Sharing – Where We Are Today .............................................15 Legislative History of U.S. Intelligence Activities Pre 9/11 ...........................15 The National Security Act of 1947 ......................................................................................15 Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 ...................19 The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) ........................................19 Executive Order 12333 (1981)............................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligence Reform: a Question of Balance John D
    PUBLICATION Intelligence Reform: A Question of Balance John D. Bansemer August 2005 Program on Information Resources Policy Center for Information Policy Research Harvard University The Program on Information Resources Policy is jointly sponsored by Harvard University and the Center for Information Policy Research. Chairman Managing Director Anthony G. Oettinger John C. B. LeGates John D. Bansemer, Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Air Force, is currently assigned to the National Security Council staff. Previously, he was commander of the 23rd Information Operations Squadron, Air Force Information Warfare Center. He has also served on the Air Staff, where he developed defensive information warfare doctrine and policy. He prepared this report while serving as an Air Force National Defense Fellow with the Program in 2004–2005. Copyright © 2005 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. Not to be reproduced in any form without written consent from the Program on Information Resources Policy, Harvard University, Maxwell Dworkin 125, 33 Oxford Street, Cambridge MA 02138. (617) 495-4114 E-mail: [email protected] URL: http://www.pirp.harvard.edu ISBN 1-879716-94-1 P-05-2 October 2005 PROGRAM ON INFORMATION RESOURCES POLICY Harvard University Center for Information Policy Research Affiliates AT&T Corp. PDS Consulting Australian Telecommunications Users Group PetaData Holdings, Ltd. BellSouth Corp. Samara Assoc. The Boeing Company Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Booz Allen Hamilton Flom LLP Center for Excellence in Education Strategy Assistance Services Commission of the European Communities TOR LLC Critical Path TransMedia Exchange CyraCom International United States Government: Ellacoya Networks, Inc. Department of Commerce Hanaro Telecom Corp. (Korea) National Telecommunications and Hearst Newspapers Information Administration Hitachi Research Institute (Japan) Department of Defense IBM Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Change in Intelligence Organizations
    UNDERSTANDING THE CHANGE IN INTELLIGENCE ORGANIZATIONS: AN INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK by Ahmet Ates A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science and International Relations Summer 2020 © 2020 Ahmet Ates All Rights Reserved UNDERSTANDING THE CHANGE IN INTELLIGENCE ORGANIZATIONS: AN INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK by Ahmet Ates Approved: __________________________________________________________ David Redlawsk, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of Political Science and International Relations Approved: __________________________________________________________ John A. Pelesko, Ph.D. Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences Approved: __________________________________________________________ Douglas J. Doren, Ph.D. Interim Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education and Dean of the Graduate College ii I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: __________________________________________________________ M.A. Muqtedar Khan, Ph.D. Professor in charge of dissertation I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: Daniel M. Green, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signed: __________________________________________________________ Kassra A. R. Oskooii, Ph.D. Member of dissertation committee I certify that I have read this dissertation and that in my opinion it meets the academic and professional standard required by the University as a dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • The President Executive Order 13470—Further Amendments to Executive Order 12333, United States Intelligence Activities
    Monday, August 4, 2008 Part IV The President Executive Order 13470—Further Amendments to Executive Order 12333, United States Intelligence Activities VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:10 Aug 01, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\04AUE0.SGM 04AUE0 pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES3 VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:10 Aug 01, 2008 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\04AUE0.SGM 04AUE0 pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES3 45325 Federal Register Presidential Documents Vol. 73, No. 150 Monday, August 4, 2008 Title 3— Executive Order 13470 of July 30, 2008 The President Further Amendments to Executive Order 12333, United States Intelligence Activities By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (Public Law 108–458), and in order to update and clarify Executive Order 13355 of August 27, 2004, Executive Order 12333 of December 4, 1981, as amended, is hereby further amended as follows: Section 1. The Preamble to Executive Order 12333, as amended, is further amended by: (a) Striking ‘‘and’’ and inserting in lieu thereof a comma before the word ‘‘accurate’’, and inserting ‘‘, and insightful’’ after the word ‘‘accurate’’ in the first sentence; (b) Striking ‘‘statutes’’ and inserting in lieu thereof ‘‘the laws’’ before ‘‘of the United States of America’’ in the third sentence; and (c) Striking ‘‘the’’ before ‘‘United States intelligence activities’’ in the third sentence. Sec. 2. Executive Order 12333, as amended, is further amended by striking Part 1 in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following new part: PART 1 Goals, Directions, Duties, and Responsibilities with Respect to United States Intelligence Efforts 1.1 Goals.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Revision of Executive Order 12333 Privacy and Civil Liberties
    OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE CIVIL LIBERTIES AND PRIVACY OFFICE Revision of Executive Order 12333 Privacy and Civil Liberties Information Paper1 A. General. Executive Order 12333 establishes the Executive Branch framework for the country’s national intelligence efforts, and for protecting privacy and civil liberties in the conduct of intelligence activities. The revised Executive Order focuses on clarifying and aligning DNI and intelligence community authorities with the post-9/11 environment – making it consistent with the authorities granted by law under the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, implementing recommendations of the 9/11 Commission and the WMD Commission, and making other changes and enhancements to further integrate the intelligence community (IC). The goal is to strengthen the nation’s intelligence leadership and integration while preserving – and enhancing – the Order’s civil liberties safeguards. 1. Part 1 of the Order lays out the various roles and responsibilities of our national security and intelligence elements of the Executive Branch. Restrictions on the conduct of intelligence activities are contained in Part 2 of the Executive Order. Definitions and general terms are addressed in Part 3. 2. Changes are concentrated in Part 1 of the Order. Minimal changes are made to Parts 2 and 3 of the Order. B. Changes to Part 1. The changes in Part 1 are intended to clarify and align DNI and IC authorities, and to better integrate the IC. These changes also contain enhanced protections for privacy and civil liberties. Most changes to Part 1 are drawn from Executive Order 13355 (which amended EO 12333 in 2004 following the 9/11 Commission report), and from the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (IRTPA), which amended the National Security Act of 1947.
    [Show full text]