DOCSLIB.ORG

Niklas Jonsson

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Niklas Jonsson TEMPORAL AND CO- VARYING CLAUSE COMBINING IN AUSTRONESIAN LANGUAGES Niklas Jonsson ii Temporal and co-varying clause combining in Austronesian languages Semantics, morpho-syntax and distributional patterns Niklas Jonsson iii Doctoal dissertation 2012 Department of Linguistics Stockholm University 106 91 stockholm ©Niklas Jonsson, Stockholm 2012 ISBN 978-91-7447-488-6 Printed in Sweden by Universitetsservice AB, Stockholm 2012 Distributor: Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University iv Abstract Various semantic relations are represented by combined clause constructions in the languages of the world. This study investigates combined clause con- structions for ten distinct semantic relations in a cross-section of Austrone- sian languages. The semantic relations selected for the study are of a tem- poral or co-varying nature, the former commonly expressed in English by such markers as when, then, until, etc. and the latter by if, so, because, etc. The research falls into three main domains: semantics, morpho-syntax and distributional patterns. First, the study provides an overview of the semantics of temporal and co-varying relations in the Austronesian languages. Several subdistinctions are found to be made within the semantic relations investigated, some cross- linguistically rare, such as general vs. fulfilled purpose, and others more common, such as distinguishing counterfactuality and concessivity for con- ditionals. The study also explores polysemic relation markers, and several patterns are identified. The single most common pattern is the overlap be- tween (open) conditional and (non-past) co-occurrence relations, for which many Austronesian languages employ the same relation marker. Second, the study develops a morpho-syntactic typology of Austronesian clause combining based on three parameters related to features common to clause combining constructions. The typology divides the constructions into five different types that are ranked with regard to structural tightness based on notions of compactness and dependency. Some constructions, cutting across several types, are also discussed; in particular, asymmetric coordina- tion, which involves the use of a coordinator to connect a fronted topicalized adverbial clause to the rest of the sentence. It is argued that the construction facilitates cognitive processing as the coordinator renders both clauses as independent, and the hearer does not have to try and fit in a cumbersome initial constituent into the sentence structure. Finally, the study explores the distributional patterns of the morpho- syntactic types across the semantic relations, as well as across three geo- graphical areas in the Austronesian region. In the former case, a clear corre- lation is found between posteriority and result relations on the one hand and looser structural types on the other. The other relations show more complex patterns and cannot easily be ordered into a linear hierarchy. One of the ana- lyses made, however, shows that several pairs of individual relations display clear differences in average tightness. The distribution of types across three Austronesian macro-regions revealed few differences between the areas, although two tendencies could be detected: the Oceanic languages generally employ slightly looser morpho-syntax for clause combining constructions, while the Formosan and Philippine languages employ slightly tighter mor- pho-syntax. v vi Table of contents Abbreviations ............................................................................................... xi Acknowledgements ..................................................................................xvii 1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 1 1.1 The domain of study ...................................................................................... 2 1.2 Aim and scope of the study .......................................................................... 7 1.3 Why Austronesian? Why temporality and co-variation? .......................... 9 1.4 Terminological notes .................................................................................... 11 1.4.1 Clauses, combined clauses and sentences ................................ 11 1.4.2 Relation marker .............................................................................. 12 1.4.3 Construction .................................................................................... 12 1.5 Organization of the thesis ........................................................................... 14 2 Earlier research on clause combining .............................................. 15 2.1 Coordination and subordination ................................................................. 16 2.1.1 The notions of coordination and subordination ......................... 16 2.1.2 Defining criteria for subordination ............................................... 19 2.2 Parallel continua, iconicity and implicational hierarchies ...................... 29 2.2.1 Parallel continua: Lehmann's typology ....................................... 29 2.2.2 Iconicity in clause combining: the RRG approach .................... 33 2.2.3 Typological hierarchies and functional motivations: Cristofaro (2005) on subordination ............................................. 40 2.3 Clause combining in Austronesian languages .......................................... 42 3 Austronesian languages and sources of data ................................. 48 3.1 The Austronesian language family............................................................. 48 3.1.1 Genealogical relationships ............................................................ 49 3.1.2 Typological characteristics ............................................................ 59 3.2 Sources, sample and database .................................................................. 65 3.2.1 Sources of data ............................................................................... 65 3.2.2 Sample of languages ...................................................................... 66 3.2.3 The database ................................................................................... 72 3.2.4 Factors possibly distorting the results ........................................ 72 vii 4 Semantic relations ............................................................................... 75 4.1 General discussion .......................................................................... 75 4.1.1 Background and the semantic relations used in the present study ................................................................................................. 75 4.1.2 The universality of semantic relations ........................................ 77 4.2 Practical considerations in the semantic classification ........................... 81 4.2.1 Principles and procedures ............................................................. 81 4.2.2 Discourse levels of interpretation ................................................ 85 4.2.3 Some terminological notes with regard to temporal ordering ............................................................................................ 86 4.2.4 Semantic relations reference map ............................................... 88 4.3 Relational categories in the Austronesian languages ............................. 90 4.3.1 Co-occurrence ................................................................................. 91 4.3.2 Posteriority ....................................................................................... 95 4.3.3 Anteriority ........................................................................................ 96 4.3.4 Terminal boundary ......................................................................... 99 4.3.5 Initial boundary ............................................................................. 103 4.3.6 Condition ........................................................................................ 104 4.3.7 Concession ..................................................................................... 113 4.3.8 Purpose ........................................................................................... 116 4.3.9 Reason ............................................................................................ 121 4.3.10 Result .............................................................................................. 123 5 Patterns of polysemy ......................................................................... 126 5.1 Three paths of development well-attested cross-linguistically ........... 126 5.2 Austronesian polysemic relation markers .............................................. 134 5.2.1 Co-occurrence-condition polysemy ........................................... 135 5.2.2 Posteriority-result polysemy ....................................................... 137 5.2.3 Condition-concession polysemy ................................................. 139 5.2.4 Purpose-reason and purpose-result polysemy ........................ 141 5.2.5 Posteriority-anteriority polysemy .............................................. 144 6 Morpho-syntactic properties of Austronesian clause combining ............................................................................................. 146 6.1 Classifying parameters .............................................................................. 146 6.1.1 Deviating morpho-syntax ...........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plural Words in Austronesian Languages: Typology and History
    Plural Words in Austronesian Languages: Typology and History A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Research Master of Arts in Linguistics by Jiang Wu Student ID: s1609785 Supervisor: Prof. dr. M.A.F. Klamer Second reader: Dr. E.I. Crevels Date: 10th January, 2017 Faculty of Humanities, Leiden University Table of contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................ iii Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................... iv List of tables ................................................................................................................... v List of figures ................................................................................................................ vi List of maps ................................................................................................................. vii List of abbreviations .................................................................................................. viii Chapter 1. Introduction .................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 2. Background literature ................................................................................... 3 2.1. Plural words as nominal plurality marking ....................................................... 3 2.2. Plural words in Austronesian languages ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Muna Dialects and Monic Lan:;(Jages: 'Icmards a Rex:Ons'iruction
    MUNA DIALECTS AND MONIC LAN:;(JAGES: 'ICMARDS A REX:ONS'IRUCTION Rene van den Eerg University of Ieiden/ Surrrrer Institute of Linguistics p:iper to oo presented at the Fifth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics Auckland, NE.w Zealand, January 10-16, 1988 ·...- MUNA DIALECI'S AND MUNIC ~ES: 'KMARDS A ROCONSTRu::::TION1 Rene van den Berg University of Leiden/ Sumrer Institute of Linguistics 0. Introduction 1. Muna: language l:x>undaries and dialects 2. Standard Muna phonology 3. Muna dialects: phonological differences 4. Muna dialects: the free pronouns 5. Muna dialects: lexical-sarantic differences 6. Pancanic isolects References Appendix 1: Cognate percentages Appendix 2: Proto-Muna etym:i. Appendix 3: Map 2 Muna-Buton area 0. Introduction Our knCMledge of the linguistic situation on the islands off the souteast coast of Sulawesi is still rud..i.rrentary . ..Adriani (1914) rrentions two languages for the islands Muna and Buton. Esser ( 1938) coined the teirn 'Muna.-Buton group' and included four languages in it. Fifty years later we still do not knCM exactly how :rrany languages there are. in this area: Anceaux ( 1978) and Bhurhanuddin ( 1979) both list seven, excluding the Bungku languages and 'Iblaki, in which they follCM Esser. In Sneddon (1982) these seven are reduced to five, whereas Kaseng et al. ( 19 83) reach a total of eight. 'Ihe only language in this group al:xmt which adequate lexical and grarrnatical info:r::rration is available is 'Wolio (Anceaux 1952, 1987) . 'Ihe question of internal subgrouping within the putative Muna-Buton group is hardly asked, nor do we know on what basis these languages are grouped tog-ether, and whether other languages should be included in this group.
    [Show full text]
  • Spices from the East: Papers in Languages of Eastern Indonesia
    Sp ices fr om the East Papers in languages of eastern Indonesia Grimes, C.E. editor. Spices from the East: Papers in languages of Eastern Indonesia. PL-503, ix + 235 pages. Pacific Linguistics, The Australian National University, 2000. DOI:10.15144/PL-503.cover ©2000 Pacific Linguistics and/or the author(s). Online edition licensed 2015 CC BY-SA 4.0, with permission of PL. A sealang.net/CRCL initiative. Also in Pacific Linguistics Barsel, Linda A. 1994, The verb morphology of Mo ri, Sulawesi van Klinken, Catherina 1999, A grammar of the Fehan dialect of Tetun: An Austronesian language of West Timor Mead, David E. 1999, Th e Bungku-Tolaki languages of South-Eastern Sulawesi, Indonesia Ross, M.D., ed., 1992, Papers in Austronesian linguistics No. 2. (Papers by Sarah Bel1, Robert Blust, Videa P. De Guzman, Bryan Ezard, Clif Olson, Stephen J. Schooling) Steinhauer, Hein, ed., 1996, Papers in Austronesian linguistics No. 3. (Papers by D.G. Arms, Rene van den Berg, Beatrice Clayre, Aone van Engelenhoven, Donna Evans, Barbara Friberg, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann, Paul R. Kroeger, DIo Sirk, Hein Steinhauer) Vamarasi, Marit, 1999, Grammatical relations in Bahasa Indonesia Pacific Linguistics is a publisher specialising in grammars and linguistic descriptions, dictionaries and other materials on languages of the Pacific, the Philippines, Indonesia, Southeast and South Asia, and Australia. Pacific Linguistics, established in 1963 through an initial grant from the Hunter Douglas Fund, is associated with the Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies at The Australian National University. The Editorial Board of Pacific Linguistics is made up of the academic staff of the School's Department of Linguistics.
    [Show full text]
  • Agustus 2014.Pdf
    MASYARAKAT LINGUISTIK INDONESIA Didirikan pada tahun 1975, Masyarakat Linguistik Indonesia (MLI) merupakan organisasi profesi yang bertujuan mengembangkan studi ilmiah mengenai bahasa. PENGURUS MASYARAKAT LINGUISTIK INDONESIA Ketua : Katharina Endriati Sukamto, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya Wakil Ketua : Fairul Zabadi, Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa Sekretaris : Ifan Iskandar, Universitas Negeri Jakarta Bendahara : Yanti, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya DEWAN EDITOR Utama : Bambang Kaswanti Purwo, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya Pendamping : Lanny Hidajat, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya Anggota : Bernd Nothofer, Universitas Frankfurt, Jerman; Ellen Rafferty, University of Wisconsin, Amerika Serikat; Bernard Comrie, Max Planck Institute; Tim McKinnon, Jakarta Field Station MPI; A. Chaedar Alwasilah, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia; E. Aminudin Aziz, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia; Siti Wachidah, Universitas Negeri Jakarta; Katharina Endriati Sukamto, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya; D. Edi Subroto, Universitas Sebelas Maret; I Wayan Arka, Universitas Udayana; A. Effendi Kadarisman, Universitas Negeri Malang; Bahren Umar Siregar, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya; Hasan Basri, Universitas Tadulako; Yassir Nasanius, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya; Dwi Noverini Djenar, Sydney University, Australia; Mahyuni, Universitas Mataram; Patrisius Djiwandono, Universitas Ma Chung; Yanti, Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya. JURNAL LINGUISTIK INDONESIA Linguistik Indonesia diterbitkan pertama kali pada tahun 1982 dan sejak tahun 2000 diterbitkan tiap bulan Februari dan Agustus. Linguistik Indonesia telah terakreditasi berdasarkan SK Dirjen Dikti No. 040/P/2014, 18 Februari 2014. Jurnal ilmiah ini dibagikan secara cuma-cuma kepada para anggota MLI yang keanggotaannya umumnya melalui Cabang MLI di pelbagai Perguruan Tinggi, tetapi dapat juga secara perseorangan atau institusional. Iuran per tahun adalah Rp 200.000,00 (anggota dalam negeri) dan US$30 (anggota luar negeri).
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeology of Sulawesi Current Research on the Pleistocene to the Historic Period
    terra australis 48 Terra Australis reports the results of archaeological and related research within the south and east of Asia, though mainly Australia, New Guinea and Island Melanesia — lands that remained terra australis incognita to generations of prehistorians. Its subject is the settlement of the diverse environments in this isolated quarter of the globe by peoples who have maintained their discrete and traditional ways of life into the recent recorded or remembered past and at times into the observable present. List of volumes in Terra Australis Volume 1: Burrill Lake and Currarong: Coastal Sites in Southern Volume 28: New Directions in Archaeological Science. New South Wales. R.J. Lampert (1971) A. Fairbairn, S. O’Connor and B. Marwick (2008) Volume 2: Ol Tumbuna: Archaeological Excavations in the Eastern Volume 29: Islands of Inquiry: Colonisation, Seafaring and the Central Highlands, Papua New Guinea. J.P. White (1972) Archaeology of Maritime Landscapes. G. Clark, F. Leach Volume 3: New Guinea Stone Age Trade: The Geography and and S. O’Connor (2008) Ecology of Traffic in the Interior. I. Hughes (1977) Volume 30: Archaeological Science Under a Microscope: Studies in Volume 4: Recent Prehistory in Southeast Papua. B. Egloff (1979) Residue and Ancient DNA Analysis in Honour of Thomas H. Loy. M. Haslam, G. Robertson, A. Crowther, S. Nugent Volume 5: The Great Kartan Mystery. R. Lampert (1981) and L. Kirkwood (2009) Volume 6: Early Man in North Queensland: Art and Archaeology Volume 31: The Early Prehistory of Fiji. G. Clark and in the Laura Area. A. Rosenfeld, D. Horton and J. Winter A.
    [Show full text]
  • UNCORRECTED PROOFS © JOHN BENJAMINS PUBLISHING COMPANY 1St Proofs 224 Michael Cysouw
    Chapter 7 A typology of honorific uses of clusivity Michael Cysouw Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology In many languages, pronouns are used with special meanings in honorific contexts. The most widespread phenomenon cross-linguistically is the usage of a plural pronoun instead of a singular to mark respect. In this chapter, I will investigate the possibility of using clusivity in honorific contexts. This is a rare phenomenon, but a thorough investigation has resulted in a reasonably diverse set of examples, taken from languages all over the world. It turns out that there are many different honorific contexts in which an inclusive or exclusive pronoun can be used. The most commonly attested variant is the usage of an inclusive pronoun with a po- lite connotation, indicating social distance. Keywords: politeness, respect, syncretism, clusivity 1. Introduction In his study of the cross-linguistic variation of honorific reference, Head (1978: 178) claims that inclusive reference, when used honorifically, indicates less social dis- tance. However, he claims this on the basis of only two cases. In this chapter, a sur- vey will be presented of a large set of languages, in which an inclusive or exclusive marker is used in an honorific sense. It turns out that Head’s claim is not accurate. In contrast, it appears that inclusive marking is in many cases a sign of greater so- cial distance, although the variability of the possible honorific usages is larger than might have been expected. There are also cases in which an inclusive is used in an impolite fashion or cases in which an exclusive is used in a polite fashion.
    [Show full text]
  • Digging for the Roots of Language Death in Eastern Indonesia: the Cases of Kayeli and Hukumina
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 384 231 FL 023 076 AUTHOR Grimes, Charles E. TITLE Digging for the Roots of Language Death in Eastern Indonesia: The Cases of Kayeli and Hukumina. PUB DATE Jan 95 NOTE 19p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America (69th, New Orleans, LA, January 5-8, 1995). PUB TYPE Reports Evaluative/Feasibility (142) Speeches /Conference Papers (150) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Diachronic Linguistics; Foreign Countries; *Geographic Location; *Indonesian Languages; *Language Role; Language Usage; Multilingualism; Power Structure; *Uncommonly Taught Languages IDENTIFIERS Indonesia ABSTRACT Looking at descriptive, comparative social and historical evidencB, this study explored factors contributing to language death for two languages formerly spoken on the Indonesian island of Buru. Field data were gathered from the last remaining speaker of Hukumina and from the last four speakers of Kayeli. A significant historical event that set in motion changing social dynamics was the forced relocation by the Dutch in 1656 of a number of coastal communities on this and surrounding islands, which severed the ties between Hukumina speakers and their traditional place of origin (with its access to ancestors and associated power). The same event brought a large number of outsiders to live around the Dutch fort near the traditional village of Kayeli, creating a multiethnic and multilingual community that gradually resulted in a shift to Malay for both Hukumina and Kayeli language communities. This contrasts with the Buru language still spoken as the primary means of daily communication in the island's interior. Also, using supporting evidence from other languages in the area, the study concludes that traditional notions of place and power are tightly linked to language ecology in this region.
    [Show full text]
  • Sulawesi Phonologies (Workpapers in Indonesian Languages And
    WORIKPAPERS IN INDONESIAN LANGUAGES AND CULTURES Vol~um~e 12 THE SUM~MER INSTITU'TE OF LINGUISTICS IN COUPERATION \VITH~ TH~E DEPARTM~ENT OF EDUCATlON AND CULTURE WORKPAPERS IN INDONESIAN LANGUAGES AND CULTURES Volume 12 SULAWESI PHONOLOGIES Rene van den Berg Editor THE SUMMER INSTITUTE OF LINGUISTICS IN COOPERATION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND CULTURE WORKPAPERS IN INDONESIAN LANGUAGES AND CULTURES VOLUME 12 SULAWESI PHONOLOGIES René van den Berg, Editor Printed 1991 Ujung Pandang, Sulawesi, "Indonesia Copies of this publication may be obtained from The Summer Institute of Linguistics KUlak Posl64 Ujung Pundang 90001 Sulewesi Selatan Indonesia Microfiche copies of this and other publications ofThe Summer Institute of Linguistics may be obtained from Academic Book Center The Summer Institute of Linguistics 7500 West Camp Wisdom Road Dallas, TX 75235 U.S.A. ISBN 979-8132-85-8 FOREWORD Earlier issues of Workpapers in Indonesian Languages and Cultures that focused on Sulawesi have dealt with survey results (see volumes 5 and 11). This is the first to be exclusively devoted to the results of phonological analysis in Sulawesi, following the pattern set by the volumes dealing with phonologies of Maluku and Irian Jaya languages. The phonologies of five languages are presented, three of which belong to the lesser known languages of the South Sulawesi group. PUS (Pitu Ulunna Salu) is described by Philip Campbell, Mamasa by DaVId Matti, and Aralle- Tabulahan by Robin McKenzie. Although the phonology of Mamasa appears to be very similar to that of Sa'dan Toraja, the other two languages show remarkable divergences, such as the presence of a sixth vowel, constraints on final nasals (only m in PUS) and the development of geminate consonants intohp,ht, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Constructions in Muna
    More than Most: Comparative Constructions in Muna René van den Berg SIL International Comparative constructions are an understudied field of research in the regional languages of Indonesia. This paper provides a detailed look at Muna, an Austronesian language of southeast Sulawesi, where there appears to be an unusually large assortment of comparative constructions and lexemes. These include the comparative, superlative and equative degree (all of which are expressed non-morphologically), correlative and ‘let alone’ constructions, as well as various inherently comparative lexemes. Of typological interest are the use of a comitative preposition for the standard marker, and the lack of a designated word meaning ‘less’. The wealth of data available is possibly related to various aspects of the Muna culture, including the popularity of competitive games and the traditional social stratification. 1. Introduction Muna is a Western Austronesian language spoken in southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia (see map 1 for the location of Muna in Indonesia).1 It is a member of the small Muna-Buton group, itself part of the larger Celebic group, which is a subgroup of Western Malayo-Polynesian. Muna is probably spoken by over 300,000 people, but the exact number of speakers is very difficult to ascertain. There has been considerable outmigration from the island of Muna to the provincial capital Kendari, as well as to other places in eastern Indonesia (Maluku, Papua), and these are not usually included in census figures. Also, there is considerable language shift to Indonesian. Traditionally this shift happened among urban and educated Muna people (especially in Kendari, but also in Raha, the capital of Muna), but it is now increasingly found across the whole island, due to widespread education in Indonesian and exposure to the media, specifically television.
    [Show full text]
  • A Grammar of Paku: a Language of Central Kalimantan
    A grammar of Paku: a language of Central Kalimantan Author: ORCID: Daniela Diedrich 0000-0001-6459-3341 Submitted in total fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2018 Department of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics School of Languages and Linguistics The University of Melbourne Victoria, Australia i Abstract This thesis describes the phonology, morphology and syntax of Paku, a highly endangered East Barito language spoken in four villages in the southeast of Central Kalimantan province, Indone- sia. It has currently about fifty speakers (conservative estimate, including semi-speakers) and since children, for a variety of reasons, no longer learn the language, it is classified as moribund. This thesis is part of a ARC-funded project The South East Barito languages in Indonesia and Mada- gascar: Safeguarding their past and future concerned with the documentation of Southeast Barito languages which Paku was thought to be a member of until the recent reclassification of lan- guages in Borneo by Smith (2017). It is a contribution to the description of the rapidly declining linguistic diversity in Borneo and other parts of the world. In doing so, this thesis will also con- tribute data of Bornean languages to broader typological research. Like many other endangered languages Paku is virtually undescribed and one of the main aims of this part of the project is the thorough documentation of Paku and the compilation of an extensive corpus of data consisting of both narratives and elicited material. This will help create a record of the language before it disappears, a fate which at this stage seems inevitable.
    [Show full text]
  • Voice Systems in the Austronesian Languages of Nusantara: Typology, Symmetricality and Undergoer Orientation
    Voice systems in the Austronesian languages of Nusantara: Typology, symmetricality and Undergoer orientation I Wayan Arka Linguistics, RSPAS, ANU A paper (invited) to be presented at the 10th National Symposium of the Indonesian Linguistics Society, Bali-Indonesia; July 2002 1 Introduction This paper deals with the typology of the Austronesian (henceforth AN) languages of Nusantara (encompassing Indonesia, East Timor, the non-Indonesian part of Borneo) by looking at their voice systems and voice markings. It will be demonstrated that they consist of a number of language-types, which can be accounted for in terms of different (default) orientations along a continuum of Actor (A) vs. Undergoer (U).1 By and large, the AN languages of Nusantara are syntactically symmetrical, but morpho-pragmatically more or less U-orientated in a number of aspects. The paper is organised as follows. A brief overview of grammatical relations and markings in AN languages of Nusantara is given in section 2, followed by the descriptions of language types and their typical properties in section 3. Section 4 provides discussions on voice system variations, whereby notions of Actor vs. Undergoer orientations are clarified and used to account for different kinds of ‘ergative’ properties that splash out throughout the AN languages of Nusantara in their morphology, syntax and discourse. Conclusion is given in section 5. 2 Grammatical relations and marking in brief The AN languages of Nusantara are essentially Verb-Object languages, with Subject possibly coming either before the verb (hence SVO, as in Indonesian, Javanese and Balinese) or after Object (hence VOS, as in Nias and Tukang Besi).
    [Show full text]
  • LCSH Section I
    I(f) inhibitors I-215 (Salt Lake City, Utah) Interessengemeinschaft Farbenindustrie USE If inhibitors USE Interstate 215 (Salt Lake City, Utah) Aktiengesellschaft Trial, Nuremberg, I & M Canal National Heritage Corridor (Ill.) I-225 (Colo.) Germany, 1947-1948 USE Illinois and Michigan Canal National Heritage USE Interstate 225 (Colo.) Subsequent proceedings, Nuremberg War Corridor (Ill.) I-244 (Tulsa, Okla.) Crime Trials, case no. 6 I & M Canal State Trail (Ill.) USE Interstate 244 (Tulsa, Okla.) BT Nuremberg War Crime Trials, Nuremberg, USE Illinois and Michigan Canal State Trail (Ill.) I-255 (Ill. and Mo.) Germany, 1946-1949 I-5 USE Interstate 255 (Ill. and Mo.) I-H-3 (Hawaii) USE Interstate 5 I-270 (Ill. and Mo. : Proposed) USE Interstate H-3 (Hawaii) I-8 (Ariz. and Calif.) USE Interstate 255 (Ill. and Mo.) I-hadja (African people) USE Interstate 8 (Ariz. and Calif.) I-270 (Md.) USE Kasanga (African people) I-10 USE Interstate 270 (Md.) I Ho Yüan (Beijing, China) USE Interstate 10 I-278 (N.J. and N.Y.) USE Yihe Yuan (Beijing, China) I-15 USE Interstate 278 (N.J. and N.Y.) I Ho Yüan (Peking, China) USE Interstate 15 I-291 (Conn.) USE Yihe Yuan (Beijing, China) I-15 (Fighter plane) USE Interstate 291 (Conn.) I-hsing ware USE Polikarpov I-15 (Fighter plane) I-394 (Minn.) USE Yixing ware I-16 (Fighter plane) USE Interstate 394 (Minn.) I-K'a-wan Hsi (Taiwan) USE Polikarpov I-16 (Fighter plane) I-395 (Baltimore, Md.) USE Qijiawan River (Taiwan) I-17 USE Interstate 395 (Baltimore, Md.) I-Kiribati (May Subd Geog) USE Interstate 17 I-405 (Wash.) UF Gilbertese I-19 (Ariz.) USE Interstate 405 (Wash.) BT Ethnology—Kiribati USE Interstate 19 (Ariz.) I-470 (Ohio and W.
    [Show full text]