DOCSLIB.ORG

CONTRASTIVE GRAMMAR: Theory and Practice

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CONTRASTIVE GRAMMAR: Theory and Practice Киї вськии університет Національнии університет імені Бориса Грінченка «Києво-Могилянська академія» CONTRASTIVE GRAMMAR: Theory and Practice KYIV 2019 0 УДК 811.111-112(076) Contrastive Grammar: Theory and Practice = Порівняльна граматика: теорія і практика: навч. посіб. / авт.-сост.: Н. Ф. Гладуш, Н. В. Павлюк; Київ. ун-т. ім. Б. Грінченка; Нац. ун-т «Києво-Могилянська акад.». – К., 2019. – 296 с. Навчальний посібник з порівняльної граматики англійської та української мов висвітлює теоретичні питання, які розкривають спільні та відмінні риси у структурі двох мов. Кожна тема з морфології та синтаксису супроводжується практичними завданнями, які допомагають краще зрозуміти і засвоїти матеріал. У другій частині надаються таблиці, які систематизують і класифікують явища, що вивчаються. Посібник відповідає програмі курсу «Порівняльна граматика англійської та української мов» для вищих навчальних закладів. Розраховано на студентів спеціальності «Філологія» навчальних закладів вищої освіти, викладачів та усіх, кого цікавлять питання структурної організації мови. УДК 811.111-112(076) 1 CONTENTS Preface 4 Unit 1. Introduction to Contrastive Grammar 5 Unit 2. Basic Grammar Notions 16 Unit 3. Contrastive Morphology 19 Unit 4. The Noun in English and Ukrainian 26 Unit 5. The Adjective, Numeral and Pronoun in English and Ukrainian 34 Unit 6. The Article 43 Unit 7. Functional Parts of Speech in English and Ukrainian 48 Unit 8. The Verb in English and Ukrainian 55 Unit 9. Verbals in English and Ukrainian 65 Unit 10. The Adverb and Stative in English and Ukrainian 72 Unit 11. Contrastive Syntax. Phrases in English and Ukrainian 78 Unit 12. The Simple sentence in English and Ukrainian 87 Unit 13. The Composite Sentence in English and Ukrainian 95 Unit 14. Contrastive Pragmatics. Pragmatic types of sentences in 99 English and Ukrainian Unit 15. Politeness in English and Ukrainian 109 References 118 2 PREFACE Language is like a human being – it never stays the same, it reacts to all that happens around, it transforms over time, and gets difficult to recognize. Like a person, it tries to find the best way to reflect reality, puts words together in a certain way, and its logic is sometimes difficult to understand. Moreover, it has its own skeleton which helps it function in the world. All languages seem to be so different that it scares those who think of learning more of them, and still they have a lot in common. How is it possible that languages with different structures have so many similarities? What makes them look for compensation if they lack this or that structure, inflexion, suffix or any other grammatical element? Why is a table, a tree or a book are ‘he’ for some languages, and ‘she’ – for another, and some of languages do not make any difference? There are so many exciting questions that need answering if you are a real fan of linguistics. This book tells about grammatical structures of two languages, English and Ukrainian. Specifics of different word-groups, their grammatical categories are described here: comparing nouns in these two languages you will see that they have much more in common than it may seem; looking at verbs you will be surprised what amazing things a language can do to compensate a lack of some grammatical category. Syntax, so important for all translators, appears to be both similar and different for English and Ukrainian, which makes our studies more complicated and still, more fascinating. When we read some theory, no matter how interesting it is, we need practicing to understand and remember it better. So, each unit of the book contains some practical exercises which will help you penetrate deeper into each problem and make this knowledge a solid part of your professional expertise. We also took care that the theory you study is systematized and classified, so all the material is presented in the form of tables in the second part of the book. In training for your future work as a translator, interpreter, editor or teacher, grammar cannot be overestimated. Mastering grammar you can obtain profound knowledge of a language, realizing why grammatical structures work so and in no other way, how word-order works in languages with analytical and synthetic features, why grammar can be important for being polite and behaving properly in society. Here we go, to the exciting new world of contrastive grammar, with all our creative energy, eager to master this subject and use this knowledge later on! Natalia Pavliuk 3 UNIT 1. Introduction to Contrastive Grammar 1. Contrastive Grammar as a linguistic discipline. 2. Basic notions of Contrastive grammar. 3. Basic notions of Grammar: functions of language, language as a structure, the system of language, syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations, linguistic signs as units of two fold nature. 4. Types of Languages. Contrastive grammar is a branch of contrastive linguistics that aims at establishing common and divergent as well as dominant and recessive features of the grammatical structure of the languages compared and determining their structural types on this basis. The number of languages subjected to typological contrasting at a time is not limited. Contrastive investigations may be focused on various linguistic phenomena ranging from separate signs of the phonetic/ phonological, morphological, lexical or syntactic phenomena of the languages. Contrastive grammar as a branch of linguistics employs some terms and notions of its own: 1) Absolute universals (i.e. features which are common to any languages of the world, cf. parts of speech, parts of the sentence etc.); 2) Near universals, i.e. features which are common to some languages under typological investigation; 3) Metalanguage, i.e. the language in which analysis of contrasted languages is carried out; 4) Typologically dominant features, i.e. features dominating in one/some/all the contrasted languages and predetermining its structural type as analytical or synthetic; cf. rigid word order, prominent role of prepositions in expressing case relations, word morphemes in expressing grammar categories, etc. in English and case, person, gender, number, tense etc. inflexions in Ukrainian; 5) Typologically recessive features, i.e. features losing their former dominant role; cf. case forms in English or dual number forms of some nouns in Ukrainian; 6) Isomorphic features, i.e. common features, observed in all the compared languages; cf. categories of number, person, tense, parts of speech. 7) Allomorphic features, i.e. divergent features, observed in one language and missing in others; cf. analytical verb forms in English; 8) Typological constants, i.e. features that are contrasted. The main typological constants of the English and Ukrainian morphology are: 1) morphemes; 2) parts of speech; 3) morphological categories of the parts of speech. Contrastive typological investigations are carried out with the help of some methods. The main one is the contrastive method, which is also employed in historical and comparative linguistics. The main aim of the contrastive method is to establish isomorphic and allomorphic, dominant and recessive features of the languages compared and drawing conclusions as to their structural types. Comparing is done on the basis of deduction and induction. Inductive method draws on the empirical facts: scientists observe the facts, make conclusions and verify these conclusions by more facts. Practically, this method needs no verification since preceding generations of researchers already proved the investigated phenomena. Deductive method presupposes making conclusions on the basis of logical calculations, which suggest all theoretically admissive variants of realization of a certain feature in, contrasted languages and consequently need verification. The (ICs) immediate constituents method is employed to contrast constituent parts of the language units. At the morphological level the ICs method helps determine morphemic structures of the words of the languages compared; cf. the nouns in-nova-tion-s and пере-напр-уг-а consist of 4 ICs. Method of oppositions is used to establish grammatical categories. Opposition is made by two forms carrying two manifestations of one categorical meaning, cf. works :: is working carry two particular manifestations (non-Continuous :: continuous) of the general categorical meaning of aspect. The term “grammar” goes back to a Greek word that may be translated as the “art of writing”. But later this word acquired a much wider sense and came to embrace the whole study of language. Now it is often used as the synonym of linguistics. Language is understood as a system of signals (linguistic signs), interconnected and interdependent. It is this network of interdependent elements that forms the object of linguistics as an independent science. Language as a system of signals may be compared to other systems of signals, such as writing, alphabets for the deaf-and-dumb, military signals, symbolic rites, forms of courtesy, etc. Thus, language becomes the object of a more general science — semiotics — that studies different systems of signals used in human societies. The difference of language and other sign systems may be presented graphically: Language Other Sign System Natural Artificial Open Closed Used by all Used by a definite group of people A system of denotators A system of indicators 5 A sign may have several meanings A sign has one meaning Universal Situationally conditioned Language has two aspects: the system of language (French: langue) and the manifestation of this system in social intercourse — speech (French: parole). The system of language is a body of linguistic units — sounds, affixes, words, grammar rules and rules of lexical series. The system of language enables us to speak and to be understood since all members of a speech community know it. Speech is the total of our utterances and texts. It is based on the system of language, and it gives the linguist the possibility of studying the system. Speech is the linear (syntagmatic) aspect of languages; the system of language is its paradigmatic aspect. The linguistic sign is bilateral, i.e. it has both form and meaning.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Qualification Paper
    THE MINISTRY OF HIGHER AND SECONDARY SPECIAL EDUCATION OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN THE UZBEK STATE WORLD LANGUAGES UNIVERSITY Qualification paper The theme: TYPES OF MOOD IN THE ENGLISH AND RUSSIAN LANGUAGES Written by the student: Sobirov Eldor Group: 423 Reviewer: Tashkent-2016 Contents: Introduction………………………………………………………………..2 CHAPTER I General view of English types of mood…………………………………7 1.1 The Category of Mood………………………………………………...9 1.2 The mood in different linguists’ point of view………………………25 1.3 The indicative mood…………………………………………………..14 CHAPTER II The subjunctive mood…………………………………………………… 2.1 The problems subjunctive mood………………………………………25 2.2 Foreign linguist’ speculation about subjunctive mood……………..22 2.3 Mood from the point of Russian linguist…………………………...31 CHAPTER III The Imperative Mood…………………………………………………… 3.1 General overview of imperatives…………………………………..42 3.2 The inner nature of imperatives……………………………………45 Conclusion………………………………………………………………50 Bibliography…………………………………………………………….49 1 Introduction Development of a science as a whole and a linguistic science, in particular is connected not only to the decision of actually scientific problems, but also with features internal and foreign policy of the state, the maintenance of the state educational standards which are to the generators of progress providing social, economic society. It forms the society capable quickly to adapt in the modern world1. Conditions of reforming of all education system the question of the world assistance to improvement of quality of scientific-theoretical aspect of educational process is especially actually put. Speaking about the 20th anniversary of National Independence President I.A.Karimov has declared in the program speech “Harmoniously development of generation a basis of progress of Uzbekistan”; “... all of us realize, that achievement of the great purposes put today before us, noble aspirations it is necessary for updating a society”.
    [Show full text]
  • ENGLISH AS an ANALYTIC LANGUAGE – the Importance of Word Order
    ENGLISH AS AN ANALYTIC LANGUAGE – the importance of word order In linguistic typology, an analytic language is a language that primarily conveys relationships between words in sentences by way of helper words (particles, prepositions, etc.) and word order, as opposed to utilizing inflections (changing the form of a word to convey its role in the sentence) (Wiki) AFFIRMATIVE SENTENCES subject verb(s) object I speak English I can speak English subject verb(s) indirect object direct object place time I will tell you the story at school tomorrow. NEGATIVE SENTENCE The word order in negative sentences is the same as in affirmative sentences. Note, however, that in negative sentences we usually need an auxiliary verb*: subject verbs indirect object direct object place time I will not tell you the story at school tomorrow. *An auxiliary verb helps the main (full) verb and is also called a "helping verb." With auxiliary verbs, you can write sentences in different tenses, moods, or voices. Auxiliary verbs are: be, do, have, will, shall, would, should, can, could, may, might, must, ought, etc. INTERROGATIVE SENTENCES In questions, the word order subject-verbs-object is the same as in affirmative sentences. The only thing that is different is that you usually have to put the auxiliary verb (or the main verb “be”) before the subject. Interrogatives (Question Words) are put at the beginning of the sentences: interrogative auxiliary *verb subject other verb(s) indirect object direct object place time What would you like to tell me Did you have a party in your flat yesterday? When were you here? Question Words in English The most common question words in English are the following: WHO is only used when referring to people.
    [Show full text]
  • To Ba Or Not to Ba Differential Object Marking in Chinese
    î To ba or not to ba Differential Object Marking in Chinese Geertje van Bergen I To ba or not to ba Differential Object Marking in Chinese Geertje van Bergen PIONIER Project Case Cross-linguistically Department of Linguistics Radboud University Nijmegen P.O. Box 9103 6500 HD Nijmegen the Netherlands www.ru.nl/pionier [email protected] III To ba or not to ba Differential Object Marking in Chinese Master’s Thesis General Linguistics Faculty of Arts Radboud University Nijmegen November 2006 Geertje van Bergen 0136433 First supervisor: Dr. Helen de Hoop Second supervisor: Prof. Dr. Pieter Muysken V Acknowledgements I would like to thank Lotte Hogeweg and the members of the PIONIER-project Case Cross-linguistically for the nice cooperation during the past year; many thanks go to Monique Lamers for the pleasant teamwork. I am especially grateful to Yangning for the close cooperation in Beijing and Nijmegen, which has laid the foundation of ¡ £¢ this thesis. Many thanks also go to Sander Lestrade for clarifying conversations over countless cups of coffee. I would like to thank Pieter Muysken for his willingness to be my second supervisor and for his useful comments on an earlier version. Also, I gratefully acknowledge the Netherlands Organisation of Scientific Research (NWO) for financial support, grant 220-70-003, principal investigator Helen de Hoop (PIONIER-project ‘Case cross-linguistically’). Especially, I would like to thank Helen de Hoop for her great support and supervision, for keeping me from losing courage and keeping me on schedule, for her indispensable comments and for all the opportunities she offered me to develop my research skills.
    [Show full text]
  • Variation in the Ergative Pattern of Kurmanji Songül Gündoğdu, Muş
    Variation in the Ergative Pattern of Kurmanji Songül Gündoğdu, Muş Alparslan University, Muş, Turkey LANGUAGE KEYWORDS: Northern Kurdish (Kurmanji) AREA KEYWORDS: Middle East (Turkey) ABSTRACT (ENGLISH) Kurdish-Kurmanji (or Northern Kurdish) belongs to the Iranian branch of the Indo-European language family. This study is dedicated to a deeper understanding of a specific grammatical feature typical of Kurmanji: the ergative structure. Based on the example of this core structure, and with empirical evidence from the Kurmanji dialect of Muş in Turkey, I will discuss the issues of variation and change in Kurmanji, more precisely the ongoing shift from ergative to nominative-accusative structures. The causes for such a fundamental shift, however, are not easy to define. The close historical vicinity to Turkish and Armenian might be a trigger for the shift; another trigger is language-internal (diachronic) change. In sum, the investigated variation sheds light on a fascinating grammatical change in a language that is also sociopolitically in a situation of constant change, movement, and upheaval. ABSTRACT (DEUTSCH) Kurdisch-Kurmanci (oder Nordkurdisch) gehört zum iranischen Zweig der indoeuropäischen Sprachfamilie. Eine zentrale und charakteristische grammatische Struktur dieser Sprache ist der Ergativ; ihm ist der vorliegende Beitrag gewidmet. Am Beispiel des Ergativ werde ich Variation und Wandel im Kurmanci diskutieren und insbesondere auf den Dialekt von Muş (Türkei) eingehen. Dabei zeigt sich, dass sich derzeit im Kurmanci der Wandel von einer Ergativ- zu einer Nominativ-Akkusativ-Sprache vollzieht. Die Ursachen für einen derart grundlegenden Wandel sind nicht leicht zu benennen. Ein Grund mag in der schon historisch engen Nachbarschaft zum Türkischen und Armenischen liegen; ein anderer Grund mag im sprach-internen (diachronen) Wandel des Kurmanci selbst zu finden sein.
    [Show full text]
  • Analytic and Cognitive Language in Instagram Captions
    ISSN 2474-8927 SOCIAL BEHAVIOR RESEARCH AND PRACTICE Open Journal Brief Research Report What Were They Thinking? Analytic and Cognitive Language in Instagram Captions Sheila Brownlow, PhD1*; Makenna Pate, BA2; Abigail Alger, BA [Student]2; Natalie Naturile, BA2 1Department of Psychology, Catawba College, Salisbury NC 28144, USA *Corresponding author Sheila Brownlow, PhD Professor and Chair, Department of Psychology, Catawba College, Salisbury NC 28144, USA; E-mail: [email protected] Article Information Received: June 15th, 2019; Revised: July 8th, 2019; Accepted: July 15th, 2019; Published: July 16th, 2019 Cite this article Brownlow S, Pate M, Alger A, Naturile N. What were they thinking? Analytic and cognitive language in Instagram captions. Soc Behav Res Pract Open J. 2019; 4(1): 21-25. doi: 10.17140/SBRPOJ-4-117 ABSTRACT Background We examined content and expression of Instagram captions of major celebrities who differed according to sex and status, with a focus on determining whether these variables influenced the use of analytic language and cognitive content. Method Instagram captions (n=942) were analyzed with the linguistic inquiry and word count (LIWC), which delineated percentage of language reflecting analytical thought and various cognitive mechanisms, such as causality and discrepancy. Results Men and low-status persons used more functional analytic language, demonstrating critical thought; in contrast, high-status celeb- rities showed more causality. Women more than men “qualified” their speech with discrepancy. These findings were not a function of sentence length. Conclusion Status increased the tendency to construct and explain, perhaps because higher status celebrities (particularly women) knew that they could hold followers’ attention with complex content.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybridity Versus Revivability
    40 Hybridity versus revivability HYBRIDITY VERSUS REVIVABILITY: MULTIPLE CAUSATION, FORMS AND PATTERNS Ghil‘ad Zuckermann Abstract The aim of this article is to suggest that due to the ubiquitous multiple causation, the revival of a no-longer spoken language is unlikely without cross-fertilization from the revivalists’ mother tongue(s). Thus, one should expect revival efforts to result in a language with a hybridic genetic and typological character. The article highlights salient morphological constructions and categories, illustrating the difficulty in determining a single source for the grammar of Israeli, somewhat misleadingly a.k.a. ‘Modern Hebrew’. The European impact in these features is apparent inter alia in structure, semantics or productivity. Multiple causation is manifested in the Congruence Principle, according to which if a feature exists in more than one contributing language, it is more likely to persist in the emerging language. Consequently, the reality of linguistic genesis is far more complex than a simple family tree system allows. ‘Revived’ languages are unlikely to have a single parent. The multisourced nature of Israeli and the role of the Congruence Principle in its genesis have implications for historical linguistics, language planning and the study of language, culture and identity. “Linguistic and social factors are closely interrelated in the development of language change. Explanations which are confined to one or the other aspect, no matter how well constructed, will fail to account for the rich body of
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Infant Segmentation of Two Morphologically Diverse Languages
    Modeling infant segmentation of two morphologically diverse languages Georgia Rengina Loukatou1 Sabine Stoll 2 Damian Blasi2 Alejandrina Cristia1 (1) LSCP, Département d’études cognitives, ENS, EHESS, CNRS, PSL Research University, Paris, France (2) University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland [email protected] RÉSUMÉ Les nourrissons doivent trouver des limites de mots dans le flux continu de la parole. De nombreuses études computationnelles étudient de tels mécanismes. Cependant, la majorité d’entre elles se sont concentrées sur l’anglais, une langue morphologiquement simple et qui rend la tâche de segmen- tation aisée. Les langues polysynthétiques - pour lesquelles chaque mot est composé de plusieurs morphèmes - peuvent présenter des difficultés supplémentaires lors de la segmentation. De plus, le mot est considéré comme la cible de la segmentation, mais il est possible que les nourrissons segmentent des morphèmes et non pas des mots. Notre étude se concentre sur deux langues ayant des structures morphologiques différentes, le chintang et le japonais. Trois algorithmes de segmentation conceptuellement variés sont évalués sur des représentations de mots et de morphèmes. L’évaluation de ces algorithmes nous mène à tirer plusieurs conclusions. Le modèle lexical est le plus performant, notamment lorsqu’on considère les morphèmes et non pas les mots. De plus, en faisant varier leur évaluation en fonction de la langue, le japonais nous apporte de meilleurs résultats. ABSTRACT A rich literature explores unsupervised segmentation algorithms infants could use to parse their input, mainly focusing on English, an analytic language where word, morpheme, and syllable boundaries often coincide. Synthetic languages, where words are multi-morphemic, may present unique diffi- culties for segmentation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Grammar of the Dom Language a Papuan Language of Papua New Guinea
    A Grammar of the Dom Language A Papuan Language of Papua New Guinea TIDA Syuntaroˆ i Table of Contents Acknowledgements xiii Abbreviations xv Maps xvii Chapter 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Geographical and demographic background . 1 1.2 Socio-linguistic setting . 1 1.2.1 Tribes and clans . 3 1.2.2 Names and Naming . 4 1.3 Linguistic background . 5 1.3.1 Genetic relationships . 5 1.3.2 Typological profile . 6 1.3.3 Papuan context . 7 1.4 Previous work . 7 1.5 Present study . 8 Chapter 2 Phonology 9 2.1 Vowels . 9 2.1.1 Minimal pairs . 9 2.1.2 Lengthening . 9 2.1.3 /e/ . 9 2.1.4 [1] and /i/ insertion . 10 2.1.5 /i/ . 11 2.1.6 /o/ . 11 2.1.7 /u/ . 12 2.1.8 /a/ . 12 2.1.9 Sequence of vowels . 12 2.2 Consonants . 13 2.2.1 Minimal pairs . 13 2.2.2 Prenasalisation and gemination . 13 2.2.3 Obstruents . 14 2.2.3.1 /p/ . 14 2.2.3.2 /b/ . 14 2.2.3.3 /k/ . 14 2.2.3.4 /g/ . 14 ii Table of Contents 2.2.3.5 /t/ . 15 2.2.3.6 /d/ . 15 2.2.3.7 /s/ . 15 2.2.3.8 /r/ . 15 2.2.3.9 /l/ and /L/........................... 16 2.2.3.10 /s/, /t/ and /l/ . 17 2.2.3.11 /c/ and /j/ . 18 2.2.4 Nasals . 19 2.2.4.1 /n/ . 19 2.2.4.2 /m/ .
    [Show full text]
  • Information Structure and Object Marking: a Study Of
    INFORMATION STRUCTURE AND OBJECT MARKING: A STUDY OF THE OBJECT PREPOSITION ʾET IN BIBLICAL HEBREW A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES HEBREW UNION COLLEGE—JEWISH INSTITUTE OF RELIGION BY PETER JOSEPH BEKINS IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY ________________________________ First Reader: Dr. Stephen A. Kaufman ________________________________ Second Reader: Dr. W. Randall Garr NOVEMBER 2012 © Copyright by Peter Joseph Bekins 2012 All rights reserved Acknowledgements I would like to begin by thanking my readers for their tireless work. My advisor, Stephen Kaufman, was everything that one could ask for in a first reader—direct and quick. I have benefited greatly from my years studying under him and completing this project with him. My second reader, Randall Garr, graciously took on this project despite the fact that we had never previously spoken, much less met. He proved to be the perfect complement with an eye to detail, and this work was improved immeasurably by his participation. I would like to thank my professors and colleagues at Hebrew Union College—Jewish Institute of Religion. The faculty of the graduate school, including Sam Greengus, David Weisberg !"#, Nili Fox, David Aaron, Jason Kalman, and Adam Kamesar, have all contributed to my growth as a scholar and a person. I thank my fellow graduate students for their friendship, fellowship, and encouragement. I would like to thank the other scholars who have taken an interest in my work and provided both support and encouragement. Robert Holmstedt and John Hobbins have given feedback and encouragement in various stages of the project.
    [Show full text]
  • ٧٠٩ Morphological Typology
    جامعة واسط العـــــــــــــــدد السابع والثﻻثون مجلــــــــة كليــــــــة التربيــــــة الجزء اﻷول / تشرين الثاني / 2019 Morphological Typology: A Comparative Study of Some Selected Languages Bushra Farhood Khudheyier AlA'amiri Prof. Dr. Abdulkareem Fadhil Jameel, Ph.D. Department of English, College of Education/ Ibn Rushud for Humanities Baghdad University, Baghdad, Iraq Abstract Morphology is a main part of English linguistics which deals with forms of words. Morphological typology organizes languages on the basis of these word forms. This organization of languages depends on structural features to mould morphological, patterns, typologising languages, assigning them to analytic, or synthetic types on the base of words segmentability and invariance, or measuring the number of morphemes per word. Morphological typology studies the universals in languages, the differences and similarities between languages in the structural patterns found in different languages, which occur within a restricted range. This paper aims at distinguishing the various types of several universal languages and comparing them with English. The comparison of languages are set according to the number of morphemes, the degree of being analytic ,or synthetic languages by given examples of each type. Accordingly, it is hypothesed that languages are either to be analytic, or synthetic according to the syntactic and morphological form of morphemes and their meaning relation. The analytical procedures consist of expressing the morphological types with some selected examples, then making the comparison between each type and English. The conclusions reached at to the point of the existence of similarity between these morphological types . English is Analytic , but it has some synythetic aspects, so it validated the first hypothesis and not entirely refuted the second one.
    [Show full text]
  • Humanity Fluent Software Language
    Pyash: Humanity Fluent Software Language Logan Streondj February 13, 2019 Contents 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Problem ................................... 4 1.1.1 Disglossia ............................... 4 1.2 Paradigm ................................... 5 1.2.1 Easy to write bad code ........................ 5 1.2.2 Obsolete Non-Parallel Paradigms .................... 5 1.3 Inspiration ................................. 5 1.4 Answer .................................... 5 1.4.1 Vocabulary ............................... 5 1.4.2 Grammar ................................ 5 1.4.3 Paradigm ................................ 6 I Core Language 7 2 Phonology 8 2.1 Notes .................................... 8 2.2 Contribution ................................. 8 3 Grammar 10 3.1 Composition ................................. 10 3.2 Grammar Tree ................................. 10 3.3 Noun Classes ................................. 10 3.3.1 grammatical number .......................... 12 3.3.2 noun classes for relative adjustment ................. 12 3.3.3 noun classes by animacy ........................ 13 3.3.4 noun classes regarding reproductive attributes ............ 13 3.4 Tense .................................... 13 3.5 Aspects ................................... 13 3.6 Grammatical Mood ............................... 14 3.7 participles ................................. 16 4 Dictionary 18 4.1 Prosody ................................... 18 4.2 Trochaic Rhythm ............................... 18 4.3 Espeak .................................... 18 4.4
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Verb Phrases
    A study of the Structure of Telugu Phrases Verb Phrase 5 Verb Phrases The verb phrase in Telugu is a head-modifier phrase having a verb as its head, and adverbials and participles being the modifiers. Again, the head verb has its own internal structure having moods, aspects, persons, numbers and genders in a close-knit sequence. Therefore, Telugu verb phrase can be conveniently termed as a close-knit head modifier phrase. These verb phrases in Telugu fill predicate slots at clause level constructions. The Telugu verb phrase can be visualised in the following way: VERB PHRASE MODIFIER HEAD Mood Verbal Person Aspect Adverbials Participles Base Number Tense Gender From the above representation the following inferences can be drawn. 1. The verb phrase is either a head-modifier phrase (Type 1), or it consists of only a single word (zero modifier). 2. The head is a close-knit phrase consisting of three interrelated systems, namely, the verbal base system; the mood, aspect and tense system and the person, number and gender system manifesting tagmemes within it. 3. The modifier slot is filled by either adverbials or participles or both, which in turn may be either single units or phrases of head-modifier, coordinate and axis-relator types. 205 A study of the Structure of Telugu Phrases Verb Phrase Formula VP = + Mod: Adv./Part. + H: vb. Read, a verb phrase has an optional modifier slot filled by an adverbial or adverbial phrase, and/or a participle or a participle phrase; and an obligatory head slot filled by a transitive or intransitive verb alongwith the person-number-gender suffixes.
    [Show full text]