DOCSLIB.ORG

Old, Middle, and Early Modern Morphology and Syntax Through Texts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Old, Middle, and Early Modern Morphology and Syntax Through Texts Old, Middle, and Early Modern Morphology and Syntax through Texts Elly van Gelderen 6 August 2016 1 Table of Contents List of Abbreviations Chapter 1 Introduction 1 The history of English in a nutshell 2 Functions and case 3 Verbal inflection and clause structure 4 Language change 5 Sources and resources 6 Conclusion Chapter 2 The Syntax of Old, Middle, and Early Modern English 1 Major Changes in the Syntax of English 2 Word Order 3 Inflections 4 Demonstratives, pronouns, and articles 5 Clause boundaries 6 Dialects in English 7 Conclusion Chapter 3 Old English Before 1100 1 The script 2 Historical prose narrative: Orosius 2 3 Sermon: Wulfstan on the Antichrist 4 Biblical gloss and translation: Lindisfarne, Rushworth, and Corpus Versions 5 Poetic monologue: the Wife’s Lament and the Wanderer 6 Conclusion Chapter 4 Early Middle English 1100‐1300 1 Historical prose narrative: Peterborough Chronicle 2 Prose Legend: Seinte Katerine 3 Debate poetry: The Owl and the Nightingale 4 Historical didactic poetry: Physiologus (Bestiary) 5 Prose: Richard Rolle’s Psalter Preface 6 Conclusion Chapter 5 Late Middle English and Early Modern 1300‐1600 1 Didactic poem: Cleanness 2 Instructional scientific prose: Chaucer’s Astrolabe 3 Religious: Margery of Kempe 4 Romance: Caxton 5 Chronicle and letters: Henry Machyn and Queen Elizabeth 6 Conclusion Chapter 6 Conclusion Appendix I Summary of all grammatical information 3 Appendix II Background on texts Appendix III Keys to the exercises Bibliography Glossary 4 Preface This book examines linguistic characteristics of English texts by studying manuscript images. I divide English into Old English, before 1100 but excluding runic inscriptions; Early Middle English, between 1100 and 1300; Late Middle English, between 1300 and 1500; and Early Modern English, after 1500. The end date of 1600 was chosen because I wanted to cover the introduction of printed text as well. The reason is that the shape of the printed letters continues the earlier scribal tradition, as does the variability in spelling. This division reflects an increase of analytic forms and a loss of synthetic ones in the 12th and 13th centuries. The 14th century and after see a stabilization and the development of more synthetic forms due to the lexical influence of French and Latin. The book is meant for readers who are somewhat familiar with the history of English and who want to look at the syntax and morphology using actual manuscripts. It emphasizes the original version and provides a careful, in depth analysis of the text. The book can be used as a companion to a course book on the history of English or on its own. It focusses on morpho‐ syntactic analysis but also paints a certain typological picture. The introductory chapter provides the reader with some background on case, agreement, auxiliaries, and so on. For readers less familiar with grammatical concepts, there is also a glossary of grammatical and linguistic terms at the end of the book. Chapter 2 outlines the major syntactic (and morphological) changes of the last 1500 years. Examples have mainly been taken from the Dictionary of Old English texts (tapor.library.utoronto.ca/doecorpus); in 5 order not to clutter the examples, I don’t give elaborate references or sources. A few of the example sentences and observations are taken from van Gelderen (2014). The chapters after the introductory two each deal with texts from a particular period: Old English in chapter 3, Early Middle English in chapter 4, and Late Middle and Early Modern English in chapter 5. The texts represent stages and registers in the history of English. Some are taken from early poetical material and from some prose, some are well‐known and some lesser known, and they are from different dialect areas when possible. In chapter 3, I have put the easier texts first but, in chapters 4 and 5, the texts are ordered chronologically. Different registers and dialects result in very different language. In Appendix II, there is some information on all the texts. After the two introductory chapters, I emphasize the facsimile versions that the editions are based on so that the reader becomes aware of the spelling, spacing, and punctuation conventions, the frequent lack of a distinction between main and subordinate sentences, the contractions, and the abbreviations. It is important to be able to read the originals since some of our current editions change the text, e.g. Brook & Leslie’s (1963) edition of Layamon’s Brut introduces hyphens where the original lacks them. This gives the wrong impression if one is studying reflexives or prefixes, for instance. There are other advantages to looking at manuscripts. Fischer (2007: 18) mentions this problem of editors having a `modern’ perspective. Fleischer (2009) argues that manuscripts tell us about prosody, something I haven’t noticed in the texts in this book, because they were meant to be read. My goal in 6 writing this book has been to go back to manuscripts and not to rely on editions that may, once in a while, make (unfortunate) editorial judgements. This allows the reader to makes his/her own decisions. To make reading the manuscript images possible, I have added transcriptions, word‐by‐ word glosses, and free translations where I thought they were needed. For the transcription, I have mainly followed Clemens & Graham (2007) except where they modernize all letters and eliminate spaces. I have not used a lot of theory‐specific terminology in the analysis sections. In chapter 1, I explain the background to ‘traditional’ grammatical concepts, such as the parts of speech, grammatical functions, and complex sentences, and I briefly discuss grammaticalization. I have tried not to clutter the chapters with references to the vast literature, e.g. on English word order. There is a section at the end of each chapter with some references. These and, especially, the Cambridge History of the English Language, volumes 1 and 2 (Hogg 1992, Blake 1992), and some of the recent Handbooks on the History of English (e.g. van Kemenade & Los 2006, Nevalainen & Traugott 2012, and Kytö et al 2016) should be helpful. There are some other books that use facsimiles, in particular Freeborn (1992, updated in 1998 and 2006). His book predates the ready availability of manuscripts online. The present book, where possible, has links to and images from the manuscripts so readers can actually see the parchment and, for later periods, the paper. Freeborn is more Middle‐English oriented and his focus is sociolinguistic (on the development of a standard language) whereas mine is 7 syntactic. Fischer at al (2000) provides explanations of Old and Middle English syntax with copious example sentences but it doesn’t consider excerpts of particular texts. Other helpful books that include facsimiles and transcriptions are Roberts (2005) and Wright (1969). Thanks to Joe Salmons and David Willis for their encouragement and to the latter for specific comments. Three anonymous referees provided helpful suggestions. Special thanks go to Johanna Wood for discussions on the scope, audience, and content of this book and to Naomi Dalton for highly specific comments that have improved the flow and argumentation a lot. In July 2016, I had the pleasure of teaching a summer school class on this topic and I thank its extremely motivated students for critical comments. List of Abbreviations ACC Accusative case ADV Adverb AUX Auxiliary BNC British National Corpus (http://www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/) CE Common Era COCA Corpus of Contemporary American English (http://corpus.byu.edu/coca/) DAT Dative case DEM Demonstrative Extr Extraposed 8 F Feminine GEN Genitive case Gr grammar INF Infinitive Lg Language M Masculine ME Middle English ModE Modern English N Neuter NOM Nominative case OE Old English OED Oxford English Dictionary OV Object‐Verb PL Plural PP Prepositional Phrase Pre‐V Preverbal PRT Particle REFL Reflexive REL Relative S Singular, or Subject 9 V2/V3 Verb‐second, verb‐third VO Verb‐Object 1 First person 2 Second person 3 Third person 7 Shorthand in Latin for et ‘and’, taken over in Old and Middle English Ɨ Shorthand for Latin vel ‘or’ between words * Reconstructed 10 Chapter 1 Introduction In this book, we’ll examine linguistic characteristics of several texts throughout the early history of English, using basic grammatical terminology. For each text, we will focus on issues such as the word order, the endings on nouns and verbs, the presence of auxiliaries, articles, and pronouns, the types of pronouns, and the nature of complex sentences. To describe a language, we need to get as close to the sources as possible. For Old and Middle English, that mostly means looking at manuscripts. Examining manuscripts used to be difficult because you’d have to travel to a certain library and get permission to study the manuscript. There were (and are) facsimile editions of some texts but they were often unclear copies. Today, many of the manuscripts have been digitized and can therefore be studied using your computer without the need for travel. The reason that we can’t rely on edited texts is that many of the editors up to the present, when they edit manuscipts for publication, add punctuation, hyphens and capitals, add spacing, and insert `missing’ letters. That’s why it is important to use manuscripts where possible to get close to a text. The main parts of the book, i.e. chapters 3, 4, and 5, provide manuscript images (sometimes from the facsimile edition and sometimes from the online copy) of a part of a text and an approximate transcription of what appears in the manuscript. Where needed, word‐by‐ word glosses and translations are offered. The book also provides an analysis of the texts and 11 some background on the style and dialect variety.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Early Modern English
    Mrs. Halverson: English 9A Intro to Shakespeare’s Language: Early Modern English Romeo and Juliet was written around 1595, when William Shakespeare was about 31 years old. In Shakespeare's day, England was just barely catching up to the Renaissance that had swept over Europe beginning in the 1400s. But England's theatrical performances soon put the rest of Europe to shame. Everyone went to plays, and often more than once a week. There you were not only entertained but also exposed to an explosion of new phrases and words entering the English language for overseas and from the creative minds of Shakespeare and his contemporaries. The language Shakespeare uses in his plays is known as Early Modern English, and is approximately contemporaneous with the writing of the King James Bible. Believe it or not, much of Shakespeare's vocabulary is still in use today. For instance, Howard Richler in Take My Words noted the following phrases originated with Shakespeare: without rhyme or reason flesh and blood in a pickle with bated breath vanished into thin air budge an inch more sinned against than sinning fair play playing fast and loose brevity is the soul of wit slept a wink foregone conclusion breathing your last dead as a door-nail point your finger the devil incarnate send me packing laughing-stock bid me good riddance sorry sight heart of gold come full circle Nonetheless, Shakespeare does use words or forms of words that have gone out of use. Here are some guidelines: 1) Shakespeare uses some personal pronouns that have become archaic.
    [Show full text]
  • Influences on the Development of Early Modern English
    Influences on the Development of Early Modern English Kyli Larson Wright This article covers the basic social, historical, and linguistic influences that have transformed the English language. Research first describes components of Early Modern English, then discusses how certain factors have altered the lexicon, phonology, and other components. Though there are many factors that have shaped English to what it is today, this article only discusses major factors in simple and straightforward terms. 72 Introduction The history of the English language is long and complicated. Our language has shifted, expanded, and has eventually transformed into the lingua franca of the modern world. During the Early Modern English period, from 1500 to 1700, countless factors influenced the development of English, transforming it into the language we recognize today. While the history of this language is complex, the purpose of this article is to determine and map out the major historical, social, and linguistic influences. Also, this article helps to explain the reasons for their influence through some examples and evidence of writings from the Early Modern period. Historical Factors One preliminary historical event that majorly influenced the development of the language was the establishment of the print- ing press. Created in 1476 by William Caxton at Westminster, London, the printing press revolutionized the current language form by creating a means for language maintenance, which helped English gravitate toward a general standard. Manuscripts could be reproduced quicker than ever before, and would be identical copies. Because of the printing press spelling variation would eventually decrease (it was fixed by 1650), especially in re- ligious and literary texts.
    [Show full text]
  • Some English Words Illustrating the Great Vowel Shift. Ca. 1400 Ca. 1500 Ca. 1600 Present 'Bite' Bi:Tə Bəit Bəit
    Some English words illustrating the Great Vowel Shift. ca. 1400 ca. 1500 ca. 1600 present ‘bite’ bi:tә bәit bәit baIt ‘beet’ be:t bi:t bi:t bi:t ‘beat’ bɛ:tә be:t be:t ~ bi:t bi:t ‘abate’ aba:tә aba:t > abɛ:t әbe:t әbeIt ‘boat’ bɔ:t bo:t bo:t boUt ‘boot’ bo:t bu:t bu:t bu:t ‘about’ abu:tә abәut әbәut әbaUt Note that, while Chaucer’s pronunciation of the long vowels was quite different from ours, Shakespeare’s pronunciation was similar enough to ours that with a little practice we would probably understand his plays even in the original pronuncia- tion—at least no worse than we do in our own pronunciation! This was mostly an unconditioned change; almost all the words that appear to have es- caped it either no longer had long vowels at the time the change occurred or else entered the language later. However, there was one restriction: /u:/ was not diphthongized when followed immedi- ately by a labial consonant. The original pronunciation of the vowel survives without change in coop, cooper, droop, loop, stoop, troop, and tomb; in room it survives in the speech of some, while others have shortened the vowel to /U/; the vowel has been shortened and unrounded in sup, dove (the bird), shove, crumb, plum, scum, and thumb. This multiple split of long u-vowels is the most signifi- cant IRregularity in the phonological development of English; see the handout on Modern English sound changes for further discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Syntactic and Semantic Relationship in Synthetic Languages
    This is the published version of the bachelor thesis: Navarro Caparrós, Raquel; van Wijk Adan, Malou, dir. The Syntactic and Semantic Relationship in Synthetic Languagues : Linear Modification in Latin and Old English. 2016. 41 pag. (838 Grau en Estudis d’Anglès i de Clàssiques) This version is available at https://ddd.uab.cat/record/164293 under the terms of the license The Syntactic and Semantic Relationship in Synthetic Languages: Linear Modification in Latin and Old English TFG – Grau d’Estudis d’Anglès i Clàssiques Supervisor: Malou van Wijk Adan Raquel Navarro Caparrós June 2016 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor Ms. Malou van Wijk Adan for her assistance and patience during the period of my research. This project would not have been possible without her guidance and valuable comments throughout. I would also like to thank all my teachers of Classical Studies and English Studies for sharing their knowledge with me throughout these four years. Finally, I wish to acknowledge my mum and my sister Ruth whose invaluable support helped me to overcome any obstacle, especially in the last two years. Without them, I am sure that I would have never been able to get where I am now. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Abbreviations ...................................................................................................... ii List of Tables .................................................................................................................. iii Abstract ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Restricted Locatives Ora Matushansky
    The case of restricted locatives Ora Matushansky To cite this version: Ora Matushansky. The case of restricted locatives. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung , 2019, 23 (2), 10.18148/sub/2019.v23i2.604. halshs-02431372 HAL Id: halshs-02431372 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02431372 Submitted on 7 Jan 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The case of restricted locatives1 Ora MATUSHANSKY — SFL (CNRS/Université Paris-8)/UiL OTS/Utrecht University Abstract. This paper examines the cross-linguistic phenomenon of locative case restricted to a closed class of items (L-nouns). Starting with Latin, I suggest that the restriction is semantic in nature: L-nouns denote in the spatial domain and hence can be used as locatives without further material. I show how the independently motivated hypothesis that directional PPs consist of two layers, Path and Place, explains the directional uses of L-nouns and the cases that are assigned then, and locate the source of the locative case itself in p0, for which I then provide a clear semantic contribution: a type-shift from the domain of loci to the object domain.
    [Show full text]
  • II Levels of Language
    II Levels of language 1 Phonetics and phonology 1.1 Characterising articulations 1.1.1 Consonants 1.1.2 Vowels 1.2 Phonotactics 1.3 Syllable structure 1.4 Prosody 1.5 Writing and sound 2 Morphology 2.1 Word, morpheme and allomorph 2.1.1 Various types of morphemes 2.2 Word classes 2.3 Inflectional morphology 2.3.1 Other types of inflection 2.3.2 Status of inflectional morphology 2.4 Derivational morphology 2.4.1 Types of word formation 2.4.2 Further issues in word formation 2.4.3 The mixed lexicon 2.4.4 Phonological processes in word formation 3 Lexicology 3.1 Awareness of the lexicon 3.2 Terms and distinctions 3.3 Word fields 3.4 Lexicological processes in English 3.5 Questions of style 4 Syntax 4.1 The nature of linguistic theory 4.2 Why analyse sentence structure? 4.2.1 Acquisition of syntax 4.2.2 Sentence production 4.3 The structure of clauses and sentences 4.3.1 Form and function 4.3.2 Arguments and complements 4.3.3 Thematic roles in sentences 4.3.4 Traces 4.3.5 Empty categories 4.3.6 Similarities in patterning Raymond Hickey Levels of language Page 2 of 115 4.4 Sentence analysis 4.4.1 Phrase structure grammar 4.4.2 The concept of ‘generation’ 4.4.3 Surface ambiguity 4.4.4 Impossible sentences 4.5 The study of syntax 4.5.1 The early model of generative grammar 4.5.2 The standard theory 4.5.3 EST and REST 4.5.4 X-bar theory 4.5.5 Government and binding theory 4.5.6 Universal grammar 4.5.7 Modular organisation of language 4.5.8 The minimalist program 5 Semantics 5.1 The meaning of ‘meaning’ 5.1.1 Presupposition and entailment 5.2
    [Show full text]
  • Phonetic and Phonological Petit Shifts
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Yamagata University Academic Repository Phonetic and phonological petit shifts TOMITA Kaoru （English phonetics） 山形大学紀要（人文科学）第17巻第３号別刷 平成 24 年（2012）２月 Phonetic and phonological petit shifts Phonetic and phonological petit shifts TOMITA Kaoru （English phonetics） Abstract Studies of language changes and their approaches are surveyed in this study. Among the changes, vowel shifts and consonant shifts observed in the history of language and modern English, and stress shifts in present-day English are introduced and discussed. Phonological studies of these sound changes, generally, present rules or restrictions. On this basis, it is proposed that consonant changes, vowel changes or stress shifts are better observed in several types of language or social contexts. It is especially emphasized that the phenomena of language changes in a real situation are to be found by observing words, phrases, sentences and even paragraphs spoken in quiet or hurried situations. Introduction Phonetic science states that language sound change is depicted as a phonetically conditioned process that originates through the mechanism of speech production. This standpoint is criticized from a large body of empirical evidence that has important consequences. Some propose frequency in use while others propose gender as the factor to explain sound changes. Sociolinguists claim that explanations that put an emphasis on language contexts or social contexts would lead the phonetic and phonological studies into the exploration of language sound changes in real situations. This paper surveys language sound changes, such as historical vowel shifts and consonant shifts, and stress shifts, with an explanation from the phonetic or social standpoints.
    [Show full text]
  • Accusative Case in Pps
    Accusative case in PPs Boban Arsenijevi ć and Berit Gehrke University of Amsterdam Pompeu Fabra University 1. Introduction In some Indo-European languages, such as most Slavic ones, Latin, or German, a number of prepositions with spatial meanings take nominal complements in two different cases: an oblique case (e.g. dative, locative 1, or instrumental), as in (1), and accusative (2). (1) a. Elena čitala knigu v komnate. Russian Elena read book. ACC in room. LOC ‘Elena read a/the book in a/the room.’ b. Hans schob den Wagen in dem Graben. German Hans pushed the. ACC cart in the. DAT ditch ‘Hans pushed the cart inside the ditch.’ (2) a. Elena položila knigu v sumku. Russian Elena put book. ACC in bag. ACC ‘Elena put a/the book in a/the bag.’ b. Hans schob den Wagen in den Graben. German Hans pushed the. ACC cart in the. ACC ditch ‘Hans pushed the cart into the ditch.’ In this paper, we will concentrate on Serbo-Croatian (S-C) and German (G), but we assume that the analysis can be applied to other languages that display this kind of case alternation in the PP domain. Traditional grammar generalizes that prepositions assign accusative in the context of a change of state, most frequently of location, in which the relevant PP denotes the result state or final location of this change. Locative, or other oblique cases, are assigned in PPs that modify the entire event (structurally represented as VP), usually for place. Accusative is linked to the denotation of the goal.
    [Show full text]
  • The for Ma Tion of the Self. Nietz Sche and Com Plex
    The Forma tion of the Self. Nietz sche and Complex ity Paul Cilliers,1 Tanya de Villiers and Vasti Roodt De part ment of Phi los o phy, Uni ver sity of Stellenbosch, Pri vate Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Af rica Ab stract: The purpose of this arti cle is to exam ine the rela ti on ship be tween the form a- tion of the self and the worldly ho rizon within which this self achieves its meaning. Our in quiry takes place from two per spec tives: the first de rived from the Nietzschean analy sis of how one becom es what one is; the other from current devel op m ents in com plexit y theory. This two-angled approach opens up differ ent, yet relat ed dim ensions of a non-essentialist un dersta nd - ing of the self that is nonethe les s nei ther arbi tra ry nor de ter minis ti c. Indeed, at the meet ing point of these two per spec tives on the self lies a concep ti on of a dynam ic, worldly self, whose iden tity is bound up with its ap pearance in a world shared with oth ers. Af ter exam ining this argu ment from the respec tive view points offered by Nietzsche and com plexit y theory, the arti cle con- cludes with a con sid er ation of some of the po lit i cal and eth i cal impli ca tions of repre sent ing our situatedness within a shared hum an dom ain as a con di- tion for self-formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Licensing of Adverbial Noun Phrases in HPSG
    Towards Licensing of Adverbial Noun Phrases in HPSG Beata Trawinski University of Tubingen¨ Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Center for Computational Linguistics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Stefan Muller¨ (Editor) 2004 CSLI Publications pages 294–312 http://csli-publications.stanford.edu/HPSG/2004 Trawinski, Beata. 2004. Towards Licensing of Adverbial Noun Phrases in HPSG. In Muller,¨ Stefan (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Head- Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Center for Computational Linguistics, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 294–312. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. Abstract This paper focuses on aspects of the licensing of adverbial noun phrases (AdvNPs) in the HPSG grammar framework. In the first part, empirical is- sues will be discussed. A number of AdvNPs will be examined with respect to various linguistic phenomena in order to find out to what extent AdvNPs share syntactic and semantic properties with non-adverbial NPs. Based on empirical generalizations, a lexical constraint for licensing both AdvNPs and non-adverbial NPs will be provided. Further on, problems of structural li- censing of phrases containing AdvNPs that arise within the standard HPSG framework of Pollard and Sag (1994) will be pointed out, and a possible solution will be proposed. The objective is to provide a constraint-based treatment of NPs which describes non-redundantly both their adverbial and non-adverbial usages. The analysis proposed in this paper applies lexical and phrasal implicational constraints and does not require any radical mod- ifications or extensions of the standard HPSG geometry of Pollard and Sag (1994). Since adverbial NPs have particularly high frequency and a wide spec- trum of uses in inflectional languages such as Polish, we will take Polish data into consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Middle English Reflexes of Germanic *Ik ‘I’: Unpacking the Changes
    Edinburgh Research Explorer The early Middle English reflexes of Germanic *ik ‘I’: unpacking the changes Citation for published version: Lass, R & Laing, M 2013, 'The early Middle English reflexes of Germanic *ik ‘I’: unpacking the changes', Folia Linguistica Historica, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 93-114. https://doi.org/10.1515/flih.2013.004 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1515/flih.2013.004 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Folia Linguistica Historica Publisher Rights Statement: © Lass, R., & Laing, M. (2013). The early Middle English reflexes of Germanic *ik ‘I’: unpacking the changes. Folia Linguistica Historica, 34(1), 93-114. 10.1515/flih.2013.004 General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 28. Sep. 2021 The early Middle English reflexes of Germanic *ik ‘I’: Unpacking the changes1 Roger Lass & Margaret Laing University of Edinburgh The phonological shape of the PDE first-person nominative singular pronoun ‘I’ is assumed to have a simple history.
    [Show full text]
  • Are You Eligible for the Senior Citizen Homeowner
    Please read but do not submit with your application Homeowner Tax Benefits Initial Application Instructions for Tax Year 2018/19 Please note: If the property has a life estate, only the individual retaining the life estate can apply. If the property is held in a trust, only the qualifying beneficiary/trustee can apply. Are you eligible for the Senior Citizen Homeowner Exemption (SCHE)? • Will all owners be 65 years of age or older by December 31, 2018? n Yes n No OR • If you own your property with either a spouse or sibling, will at least one of you be 65 years of age or older by December 31, 2018? • Will you have owned this property for at least 12 consecutive months prior n Yes n No to the date of filing this application? • Is the property the primary residence for ALL senior owners and their spouses? n Yes n No (All owners must reside on the property unless they are legally separated, divorced, abandoned or residing in a health care facility.*) *If an owner is residing in a health care facility, please submit documentation including total cost of care at the facility. • Is the Total Combined Income (TCI) for all owners and spouses $37,399 or less, n Yes n No regardless of where they live? (The income of a spouse may be excluded if he or she is absent from the residence due to divorce, legal separation or abandonment.) If you have answered NO to any of these questions, you MAY NOT be eligible for the Senior Citizen Homeowner Exemption.
    [Show full text]