The Rally-Intensive Campaign: a Distinct Form Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Rally-Intensive Campaign: a Distinct Form Of The rally-intensive campaign: A distinct form of electioneering in sub-Saharan Africa and beyond Pre-proof of article for publication in the International Journal of Press/Politics in May 2019 Dr. Dan Paget Department of Political Science University College London danpaget.com [email protected] The literature on political communication is a redoubt of modernist thought. Histories of political communication are in part histories of technological progress. Accounts, which are too numerous to list comprehensively here, rehearse a well-worn story in which newspapers are joined by radio, limited-channel television, multiple-channel television, the Internet and social media in turn (Dinkin 1989; Epstein 2018). Numerous authors have organized these successive innovations into ‘ages’ or ‘orders’ of political communication (Blumler and Kavanagh 1999; Epstein 2018). These modernist ideas bleed into the study of election campaigns. A series of accounts using parallel categories construct three ideal-types of election campaign (Norris 2000). These campaign types capture, among other things, changes in the methods by which messages are conveyed. ‘Old’ face-to-face methods of communication in ‘premodern’ campaigns are supplemented and sometimes replaced by a succession of ‘new’ methods in ‘modern’ and ‘postmodern’ campaigns. These theories embrace a form of developmental linearity. They conceive of a single path of campaign ‘evolution’ (Norris 2000). While campaigns may progress or regress, campaign change Dan Paget Pre-proof version is collapsed onto a single dimension, whether by the name of modernization or professionalization. It is this linearity that gives typologies of election campaigns their modernist character. It is also essential to these theories’ parochialism. Media systems have been studied extensively beyond the Western world. However, typologies in the narrower domain of election campaigns remain remarkably Western-centric in both their source material and domains of application, albeit with notable exceptions (Plasser and Plasser 2002). In this article, I do not challenge the conventional causal accounts of campaign change. However, I complicate these typologies. I contend that their conceptual linearity obscures variation in another aspect of electioneering: ground campaigns. In these typologies, ground campaigns feature only by virtue of their centrality in premodern campaigns and their peripherality in modern and postmodern campaigns. However, ground campaigns vary. In some, politicians reach few citizens directly at rallies. Instead, the rally is primarily a device to win media coverage. It is used almost exclusively by party leaders, if it is used at all. By contrast, in other ground campaigns, the rally is a medium through which junior and senior politicians alike interact directly with large portions of their constituents. For example, on the eve of Turkey’s 2018 election, an estimated million people attended one rally (Shaheen 2018). In India’s 2019 campaign, an estimated half million people attended another (Al Jazeera 2019). Rallies are important features of some Latin American campaigns (de la Torre and Conaghan 2009; Szwarcberg 2012). Data that I present below reveals that aggregate rally attendance is high in many Asian countries, and higher still in many African countries. However, existing typologies of election campaigns cannot satisfactorily express this variation in ground campaigns. I revise Norris’ typology to address that shortcoming. This adapted typology creates the conceptual space to incorporate a distinct ideal-type: the rally-intensive campaign. This proposed revision moves the center of gravity of the schema from the Global North towards the Global South. It equips the typology to capture important aspects of campaigns in 2 Dan Paget Pre-proof version parts of sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, and Asia. It gives expression to differences between these campaigns and their Western counterparts. Equally, it makes important distinctions within the population of ‘premodern’ election campaigns. Therefore, it speaks to the debate about electioneering in the Western world, and widely-accepted accounts of the main features of historic campaign evolution. While the prominence of the rally is intercontinental, it is most pronounced in parts of sub- Saharan Africa. In spite of this, the means through which political messages are conveyed are little studied in the Africanist literature. Some of the last major works to study the structure of face-to-face communication in sub-Saharan Africa were written before the third wave of democratization and the revival of multiparty campaigns (Ellis 1989; Haugerud 1995). While their insights remain pertinent, they deserve updating. A rich body of work has developed which examines electioneering in multiparty sub-Saharan Africa. However, the great majority of these studies focus on parties’ messages or appeals. The means and media by which parties convey those messages in the campaign are little-studied. This is my point of departure from the Africanist literature. I seek to restore the character and structure of campaign communication in general and ground campaign communication in particular to the study of African electioneering. I argue that in many African campaigns, the rally is the primary medium of direct campaign communication. This structural aspect of campaign ecology underpins a variety of other features of the ground campaign. Equally, the prominence of the rally is a source of substantial variation between African campaigns; while some are rally-intensive, others are not. Typologies should make distinctions which turn on fundamental characteristics alone. I argue that aggregate rally-intensiveness is associated with four typical features. I demonstrate this through a detailed study of an extreme case (Flyvbjerg 2006): Tanzania. If the survey data is correct, Tanzania has the most rally-intensive campaigns in Africa, and to the best of my 3 Dan Paget Pre-proof version knowledge, the world. I distil the four features of the rally-intensive campaign by observing the stark form that they take in the Tanzanian case. First, drawing on my ethnographic research, I show that not only national leaders dedicate substantial effort to convening rallies. Mid- and low- level candidates do too. Therefore, during each day of the campaign, thousands of rallies are convened, both locally and nationally. Second, using original survey data, I show that local rallies are better attended in aggregate than national ones. Consequently, in rally-intensive campaigns, a large proportion of campaign contact is not only direct but intimate. Third, I show that in rally- intensive campaigns the mass meeting dwarfs the canvass as a form of campaign contact. Fourth, I illustrate that Tanzanian parties’ ground campaign efforts are concentrated not on canvassing, but on a bundle of activities which I term the ‘production’ of rallies. Thereby, this paper deals in what John Gerring ironically describes as ‘mere description’ (Gerring 2012). It takes the categorization and characterization of campaigns as an academic end in itself. I proceed in this article by introducing the comparative typologies of election campaigns. In the second section, I juxtapose these works to the literature on election campaigning in sub-Saharan Africa to throw into relief the relative silence of the latter on ground campaign contact. In the third section, I present my departure from both of these literatures. I argue that aggregate rally attendance varies. It varies between the Global South and the contemporary Western world, within sub-Saharan Africa, and within the population of historic ‘premodern’ campaigns in Western countries. I argue that existing campaign typologies obscure, rather than order, this variation. I advance a typology of campaign ecologies adopted from Norris’ own which incorporates the rally-intensive campaign as a distinct ideal-type. In the fourth section, I enumerate typical features of the rally-intensive campaign by presenting evidence from my research in Tanzania. 4 Dan Paget Pre-proof version Typologies of election campaigns Pippa Norris advances a typology of premodern, modern, and postmodern campaigns (Norris 2000). Rachel Gibson and Andrea Römmele distinguish between premodern, modern and professional campaigns in almost identical terms (Gibson and Rommele 2001). Similarly, David Farrell and Paul Webb have advanced three ‘stages’ of election campaign professionalization (Farrell and Webb 2000). In parallel, Jay Blumler and Dennis Kavanagh identify three ‘ages of political communication’ (Blumler and Kavanagh 1999) and Ben Epstein enumerates four ‘political communication orders’ (Epstein 2018). Typologies of political communication have broader scopes than typologies of election campaigns. Nonetheless, these typologies agree in numerous respects. Each, save Epstein’s, enumerates three categories.i Each takes the proliferation of limited channel television as the dividing line, or part of the dividing line, between the first and second categories. Equally, each takes the multiplication of television channels, the diffusion of the Internet, and related developments as the dividing line, or part of the dividing line, between the second and third categories.ii They identify similar sets of features as characteristic of each category too. Norris takes the media and means of communication, party campaign activity, political party organization and the behavior of the electorate as the
Recommended publications
  • Hotuba Ya Mgeni Rasmi Mhe. Kassim Majaliwa Majaliwa (Mb) Waziri Mkuu Wa Jamhuri Ya Muungano Wa Tanzania Katika Ufunguzi Wa Mkuta
    HOTUBA YA MGENI RASMI MHE. KASSIM MAJALIWA MAJALIWA (MB) WAZIRI MKUU WA JAMHURI YA MUUNGANO WA TANZANIA KATIKA UFUNGUZI WA MKUTANO WA MWAKA WA WADAU WA LISHE, SEPTEMBA 10, 2019 Mheshimiwa Jenista Mhagama (Mb), Waziri wa Nchi Ofisi ya Waziri Mkuu, Sera, Bunge, Kazi, Vijana, Ajira na wenye Ulemavu, Mheshimiwa Ummy Mwalimu (Mb), Waziri wa Afya, Maendeleo ya Jamii, Jinsia, Wazee na Watoto, Mheshimiwa Suleiman Jafo (Mb), Waziri wa Nchi Ofisi ya Rais – TAMISEMI. Mheshimiwa Prof. Joyce Ndalichako (Mb), Waziri wa Elimu, Sayansi, Teknolojia na Mafunzo ya Ufundi, Mheshimiwa Dkt. Philip Mpango (Mb), Waziri wa Fedha na Mipango. Mheshimiwa Japhet Hasunga (Mb), Waziri wa Kilimo, Mheshimiwa Luhaga Mpina (Mb), Waziri wa Mifugo na Uvuvi, Mheshimiwa Innocent Bashungwa (Mb), Waziri wa Viwanda, Biashara na Uwezeshaji, Mheshimiwa Prof. Makame Mbarawa (Mb), Waziri wa Maji na Umwagiliaji. Mheshimiwa Doto Biteko (Mb), Waziri wa Madini, Waheshimiwa Manaibu Waziri na Makatibu Wakuu, Mheshimiwa Mkuu wa Mkoa wa Dodoma Dkt. Bilinith Mahenge; pamoja na viongozi wengine wa ngazi za Mkoa na Halmashauri mliopo, Waheshimiwa Wabunge na viongozi wa Vyama vya Siasa, Waheshimiwa Mabalozi wanaoziwakilisha nchi mbalimbali, Ndugu Viongozi waandamizi wa Idara, Taasisi, Wakala za Serikali, Wakuu wa Vyuo vya Elimu ya Juu, Wawakilishi wa Mashirika ya Kimataifa, Wadau wa Maendeleo na Asasi za Kiraia, 1 Ndugu Mkurugenzi Mtendaji wa Taasisi ya Chakula na Lishe Tanzania, Ndugu Wageni Waalikwa, Waandishi wa habari na wadau wote wa Lishe, Mabibi na Mabwana. Habari za asubuhi Kwa mara nyingine tena nina furaha kubwa sana kujumuika na wadau wa lishe siku hii ya leo. Hii ni mara yangu ya tatu kuhudhuria mkutano wa mwaka wa wadau wa lishe nchini na hivyo nahisi kuwa mwanafamilia wa wadau waliohamasika katika masuala ya lishe.
    [Show full text]
  • Jamhuri Ya Muungano Wa Tanzania
    JAMHURI YA MUUNGANO WA TANZANIA BUNGE LA TANZANIA MKUTANO WA KUMI NA SITA NA KUMI NA SABA YATOKANAYO NA KIKAO CHA NNE (DAILY SUMMARY RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS) 7 NOVEMBA, 2014 MKUTANO WA KUMI NA SITA NA KUMI NA SABA KIKAO CHA NNE – 7 NOVEMBA, 2014 Kikao kilianza saa 3:00 Asubuhi kikiongozwa na Mhe. Job Y. Ndigai, Mb Naibu Spika ambaye alisoma Dua. MAKATIBU MEZANI 1. Ndg. Charles Mloka 2. Ndg. Lina Kitosi 3. Ndg. Hellen Mbeba I. MASWALI YA KAWAIDA Maswali yafuatayo yaliulizwa na wabunge na kupitia majibu Bungeni:- 1. Ofisi ya Waziri Mkuu – swali na. 38 la Mhe. Anne Kilango 2. Ofisi ya Waziri Mkuu – swali na. 39 la Mhe. Salum Khalfan Barwary 3. Ofisi ya Waziri Mkuu – swali na. 40 la Mhe. Moses Joseph Machali 4. Wizara ya Ardhi, Nyumba na Maendeleo ya Makazi – swali na. 41. La Mhe. Omar Rashid Nundu 5. Wizara ya Maendeleo ya Mifungo na Uvuvi – swali na. 42. La Mhe. Hilda Ngoye 6. Wizara ya Mambo ya Ndani ya Nchi – swali na. 43. La Mhe. Zitto Kabwe Zuberi 7. Wizara ya Mawasiliano, Sayansi na Tecknolojia – swali na. 44 –la Mhe. Murtaza Mangungu 8. Wizara ya Mawasiliano, Sayansi na Teknolojia - swali na. 45-la Mhe. Godfrey Mgimwa 9. Wizara ya Katiba na Sheria - swali na. 46 – la Mhe. Neema Mgaya Hamid 2 10. Wizara ya Katiba na Sheria- swali na. 47 – la Mhe. Assumpter Mshana 11. Wizara ya Habari, Vijana, Utamaduni na Michezo – swali na. 48 la Mhe. Khatib Said Hji. 12. Wizara ya Habari, Vijana, Utamaduni na Michezo - swali na. 49 la Mhe.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Technical Note on Indigenous Peoples' Issues
    Country Technical Note on Indigenous Peoples’ Issues United Republic of Tanzania Country Technical Notes on Indigenous Peoples’ Issues THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA Submitted by: IWGIA Date: June 2012 Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IFAD concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The designations ‗developed‘ and ‗developing‘ countries are intended for statistical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. All rights reserved Acronyms and abbreviations ACHPR African Commission on Human and Peoples‘ Rights ASDS Agricultural Sector Development Strategy AU African Union AWF African Wildlife Fund CBO Community Based Organization CCM Chama Cha Mapinduzi (Party of the Revolution) CELEP Coalition of European Lobbies for Eastern African Pastoralism CPS Country Partnership Strategy (World Bank) COSOP Country Strategic Opportunities Paper (IFAD) CWIP Core Welfare Indicator Questionnaire DDC District Development Corporation FAO Food and Agricultural Organization FBO Faith Based Organization FGM Female Genital Mutilation FYDP Five Year Development Plan
    [Show full text]
  • TANZANIA GOVERNANCE REVIEW 2013: Who Will Benefit from the Gas Economy, If It Happens?
    TANZANIA GOVERNANCE REVIEW 2013: Who will benefit from the gas economy, if it happens? TANZANIA GOVERNANCE REVIEW 2013: Who will benefit from the gas economy, if it happens? TANZANIA GOVERNANCE REVIEW 2013 Who will benefit from the gas economy, if it happens? Supported by: 2 TANZANIA GOVERNANCE REVIEW 2013: Who will benefit from the gas economy, if it happens? ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Policy Forum would like to thank the Foundation for Civil Society for the generous grant that financed Tanzania Governance Review 2013. The review was drafted by Tanzania Development Research Group and edited by Policy Forum. The cartoons were drawn by Adam Lutta (Adamu). Tanzania Governance Reviews for 2006-7, 2008-9, 2010-11, 2012 and 2013 can be downloaded from the Policy Forum website. The views expressed and conclusions drawn on the basis of data and analysis presented in this review do not necessarily reflect those of Policy Forum. TGRs review published and unpublished materials from official sources, civil society and academia, and from the media. Policy Forum has made every effort to verify the accuracy of the information contained in TGR2013, particularly with media sources. However, Policy Forum cannot guarantee the accuracy of all reported claims, statements, and statistics. Whereas any part of this review can be reproduced provided it is duly sourced, Policy Forum cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts. ISBN:978-9987-708-19-2 For more information and to order copies of the report please contact: Policy Forum P.O. Box 38486 Dar es Salaam Tel +255 22 2780200 Website: www.policyforum.or.tz Email: [email protected] Suggested citation: Policy Forum 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Tarehe 30 Juni, 2017
    NAKALA MTANDAO(ONLINE DOCUMENT) BUNGE LA TANZANIA ____________ MAJADILIANO YA BUNGE ___________ MKUTANO WA SABA Kikao cha Hamsini na Saba – Tarehe 30 Juni, 2017 (Bunge Lilianza Saa Tatu Asubuhi) D U A Spika (Mhe. Job Y. Ndugai) Alisoma Dua SPIKA: Waheshimiwa Wabunge, tukae. Tunaendelea na Mkutano wetu wa Saba, leo ni Kikao cha Hamsini na Saba. Katibu! NDG. RAMADHANI ISSA ABDALLAH – KATIBU MEZANI: MASWALI NA MAJIBU SPIKA: Tunaanza na Ofisi ya Mheshimiwa Rais, Tawala za Mikoa na Serikali za Mitaa. Swali la kwanza linaulizwa na Mheshimiwa Stanslaus Haroon Nyongo, Mbunge wa Maswa Mashariki. Mheshimiwa Nyongo. Na. 468 Mikopo kwa Walimu Kwa Ajili ya Ujenzi wa Nyumba MHE. STANSLAUS H. NYONGO aliuliza:- Walimu Wilayani Maswa wana uhaba wa nyumba za kuishi; pamoja na juhudi za wananchi kujenga nyumba za walimu wa shule za msingi na sekondari lakini walimu hao bado wanahitaji kujenga nyumba zao wenyewe za kudumu. 1 NAKALA MTANDAO(ONLINE DOCUMENT) Je, ni lini Serikali itaweka utaratibu maalum wa kutoa mikopo kwa walimu hao ili wajenge nyumba zao binafsi? NAIBU WAZIRI, OFISI YA RAIS, TAWALA ZA MIKOA SERIKALI ZA MITAA alijibu:- Mheshimiwa Spika, kwa niaba ya Waziri wa Nchi, Ofisi ya Rais, TAMISEMI naomba kujibu swali la Mheshimiwa Stanslaus Haroon Nyongo, Mbunge wa Maswa Mashariki kama ifuatavyo:- Mheshimiwa Spika, Halmashauri ya Wilaya ya Maswa ina uhitaji wa nyumba za walimu 1,358. Nyumba zilizopo ni 479 na hivyo upungufu ni nyumba 879. Mheshimiwa Spika, kutokana na upungufu huu Serikali kupitia Halmashauri ya Wilaya ya Maswa ina mpango wa kujenga nyumba 16 katika mwaka wa fedha 2017/2018. Aidha, kati ya nyumba hizo, nyumba nane zitajengwa kwa bajeti ya 2017/2018 (CDG) na nyumba nyingine nane zitajengwa kwa kutumia mapato ya ndani y (own source) ya Halmashauri.
    [Show full text]
  • AN ETHNOGRAPHY of DEAF PEOPLE in TANZANIA By
    THEY HAVE TO SEE US: AN ETHNOGRAPHY OF DEAF PEOPLE IN TANZANIA by Jessica C. Lee B.A., University of Northern Colorado, 2001 M.A., Gallaudet University, 2004 M.A., University of Colorado, 2006 A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Colorado in partial fulfillment of the degree requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Anthropology 2012 ii This thesis entitled: They Have To See Us: an Ethnography of Deaf People in Tanzania written by Jessica Chantelle Lee has been approved for the Department of Anthropology J. Terrence McCabe Dennis McGilvray Paul Shankman --------------------------------------------- Date The final copy of this thesis has been examined by the signatories, and we find that both the content and the form meet acceptable presentation standards of scholarly work in the above mentioned discipline. IRB protocol # 13090619 iii ABSTRACT They Have To See Us: an Ethnography of Deaf People in Tanzania Jessica Lee Department of Anthropology Thesis directed by Professor J. Terrence McCabe This dissertation explores the relationship between Tanzanian deaf people and mainstream society, as well as dynamics within deaf communities. I argue that deaf people who do participate in NGOs and other organizations that provide support to deaf people, do so strategically. In order to access services and improve their own lives and the lives of their families, deaf people in Tanzania move comfortably and fluidly between identity groups that are labeled as disabled or only as deaf. Through intentional use of the interventions provided by various organizations, deaf people are able to carve out deaf spaces that act as places for transmission of information, safe areas to learn and use sign language, and sites of network and community development among other deaf people.
    [Show full text]
  • Masterproef Lies
    UNIVERSITEIT GENT FACULTEIT POLITIEKE EN SOCIALE WETENSCHAPPEN Het Primary Education Development Programme in Tanzania: een analyse van de toegankelijkheid en de kwaliteit van het basisonderwijs op lokaal vlak in Mwanza. Wetenschappelijke verhandeling aantal woorden: 21956 LIES GOBYN MASTERPROEF MANAMA CONFLICT AND DEVELOPMENT PROMOTOR : PROF. DR. ANNE WALRAET COMMISSARIS : ELS LECOUTERE COMMISSARIS : KAREN BÜSCHER ACADEMIEJAAR 2009 – 2010 I do not have to earn The right to learn It’s mine. And if because Of faulty laws And errors of design, And far too many places where Still far too many people do not care – If because of all these things, and more, For me, the classroom door, With someone who can teach, Is still beyond my reach, Still out of sight, Those wrongs do not remove my right. 1 1 Uit: My right to learn , Robert Prouty (Unesco/Unicef, 2007, p. 14). Foto: Muurschildering in Mwanza centrum, foto gemaakt op 24 augustus 2009. 2 I. Voorwoord Het is voor mij een aangename plicht hier de mensen te bedanken die me op de één of andere manier geholpen hebben bij het tot stand komen van deze masterproef. In de eerste plaats wil ik mijn promotor, professor Dr. Anne Walraet, en commissaris Els Lecoutere bedanken voor de handige tips en feedback bij het schrijven. Daarnaast ben ik ook Frednand Fredrick bijzonder dankbaar. Hij heeft me in Mwanza met een hoop interessante mensen in contact gebracht, geen enkele moeite was hem te veel. Zonder zijn onvoorwaardelijke hulp was deze masterproef er nooit gekomen. Ook Jolien, mijn steun en toeverlaat in Mwanza, wil ik oprecht bedanken voor haar lieve aanwezigheid en haar luisterend oor.
    [Show full text]
  • TANZANIA GOVERNANCE REVIEW 2012: Transparency with Impunity?
    TANZANIA GOVERNANCE REVIEW 2012: Transparency with Impunity? TANZANIA GOVERNANCE REVIEW 2012: Transparency with Impunity? With Partial Support from a TANZANIA GOVERNANCE REVIEW 2012: Transparency with Impunity? ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This review was compiled and edited by Tanzania Development Research Group (TADREG) under the supervision of the Steering Group of Policy Forum members, and has been financially supported in part by Water Aid in Tanzania and Policy Forum core funders. The cartoons were drawn by Adam Lutta Published 2013 For more information and to order copies of the review please contact: Policy Forum P.O Box 38486 Dar es Salaam Tel: +255 22 2780200 Website: www.policyforum.or.tz Email: [email protected] ISBN: 978-9987 -708-09-3 © Policy Forum The conclusions drawn and views expressed on the basis of the data and analysis presented in this review do not necessarily reflect those of Policy Forum. Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this review, including allegations. Nevertheless, Policy Forum cannot guarantee the accuracy and completeness of the contents. Whereas any part of this review may be reproduced providing it is properly sourced, Policy Forum cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts. Designed by: Jamana Printers b TANZANIA GOVERNANCE REVIEW 2012: Transparency with Impunity? TABLE OF CONTENTS POLICY FORUM’s OBJECTIVES .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final TZ Report 28-8-06
    FINAL REPORT FINAL REPORT TIE of theTanzania National Programme for Councillors Training Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms ii Executive Summary iii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Overview of the Policy Context 1 1.2 Background to the National Programme for Councillors Training 2 1.3 Background to the Training Impact Evaluation (TIE) 3 2 TIE APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 4 2.1 Preparation and Orientation 4 2.2 Data Collection 4 2.3 Analysis and Reporting 5 2.4 Feedback and Reflection 6 2.5 Process Challenges and Mitigation 6 2.6 The team and acknowledgement 8 3 PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF FINDINGS 9 3.1 Analysis of the Pre-Training Activities 9 3.1.1 Capacity needs assessment process 9 3.1.2 Capacity Needs Identified 10 3.2 Analysis of the Scope and Training Processes 11 3.2.1 Content issues 11 3.2.2 Process/Mechanics issues 14 3.2.3 Organisational and logistical support 22 3.3 Analysis of Impact on Individual Learning 24 3.3.1 Analysis of objectives 24 3.3.2 Analysis of the acquisition of knowledge and skills 24 3.4 Impact on Job Behaviour, Organisation and Human Settlements 25 3.4.1 Adherence to legal provisions and procedures 25 3.4.2 Roles and responsibilities in relation to leadership and management 27 3.4.3 Role of councillors in service delivery 31 3.4.4 Roles in management and control of LG finances 31 3.4.5 Crosscutting Issues 32 4 SUMMARY OF LESSONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 35 4.1 Improving the Next Round of Councillor Training in Tanzania 35 4.2 Institutionalising Training: Lessons from the Councillors Training 38 4.3 Overall Assessment
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Natural Resources Programme, Tanzania TAN-0092
    Management of Natural Resources Programme, Tanzania TAN-0092 Final Evaluation NORAD COLLECTED REVIEWS 1/2007 Dr Brian Cooksey (Team Leader), Mr Leonce Anthony, Dr Jim Egoe, Ms Kate Forrester, Professor George Kajembe, Mr Bakari Mbano, Ms Isabell von Oertzen, Dr Sibylle Riedmiller Commissioned by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism, Tanzania, and the Royal Norwegian Embassy, Dar es Salaam Norad collected reviews The report is presented in a series, compiled by Norad to disseminate and share analyses of development cooperation. The views and interpretations are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation. Norad Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation P.O. Box 8034 Dep, NO- 0030 OSLO Ruseløkkveien 26, Oslo, Norway Phone: +47 22 24 20 30 Fax: +47 22 24 20 31 ISBN 978-82-7548-188-5 Management of Natural Resources Programme, Tanzania TAN-0092 Final Evaluation VOLUME 1: Main Report Summary of Main Findings and Recommendations REVISED FINAL REPORT Dr Brian COOKSEY (Team Leader) Mr Leonce ANTHONY Dr Jim EGOE Ms Kate FORRESTER Professor George KAJEMBE Mr Bakari MBANO Ms Isabell von OERTZEN Dr Sibylle RIEDMILLER Final Report submitted to the Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism and the Royal Norwegian Embassy, Dar es Salaam November 2006 3 Management of Natural Resources Programme, Tanzania TAN-0092 Final Evaluation TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1: MAIN REPORT Summary of Main Findings and Recommendations Executive summary i-iv Acknowledgement v Acronyms and abbreviations
    [Show full text]
  • Tarehe 4 Mei, 2021
    NAKALA MTANDAO(ONLINE DOCUMENT) BUNGE LA TANZANIA ________ MAJADILIANO YA BUNGE _________ MKUTANO WA TATU Kikao cha Ishirini na Mbili – Tarehe 4 Mei, 2021 (Bunge Lilianza Saa Tatu Asubuhi) D U A Spika (Mhe. Job Y. Ndugai) Alisoma Dua SPIKA: Waheshimiwa Wabunge, tukae. Tunaendelea na Mkutano wetu wa Tatu, leo ni Kikao cha Ishirini na mbili. Katibu! NDG. MOSSY LUKUVI – KATIBU MEZANI: HATI ZILIZOWASILISHWA MEZANI Hati zifuatazo ziliwasilishwa mezani na:- NAIBU WAZIRI WA ELIMU, SAYANSI NA TEKNOLOJIA: Hotuba ya Bajeti ya Wizara ya Elimu, Sayansi na Teknolojia kwa mwaka wa fedha 2021/2022. MHE. HUSNA J. SEKIBOKO - K.n.y. MAKAMU MWENYEKITI WA KAMATI A KUDUMU YA BUNGE YA HUDUMA NA MAENDELEO YA JAMII: Taarifa ya Kamati ya Kudumu ya Bunge ya Huduma na Maendeleo ya Jamii kuhusu utekelezaji wa majukumu ya Wizara ya Elimu, Sayansi na Teknolojia kwa mwaka wa fedha 1 NAKALA MTANDAO(ONLINE DOCUMENT) 2020/2021 pamoja na Maoni ya Kamati kuhusu Makadirio ya Mapato na Matumizi ya Wizara hiyo kwa mwaka wa fedha 2021/2022. SPIKA: Ahsante sana, Mheshimiwa Husna Sekiboko kwa niaba ya Kamati. Katibu! NDG. MOSSY LUKUVI – KATIBU MEZANI: MASWALI NA MAJIBU SPIKA: Swali letu la kwanza leo tunaanza na Ofisi ya Rais Tawala za Mikoa na Serikali za Mitaa, swali hilo litaulizwa na Mheshimiwa Hassan Selemani Mtenga Mbunge wa Mtwara Mjini. Mheshimiwa Mtenga tafadhali uliza swali lako. Na. 179 Kujenga Barabara za Lami-Kata za Manispaa ya Mtwara Mikindani MHE. HASSAN S. MTENGA aliuliza:- Je, Serikali ina mpango gani wa kujenga barabara za lami katika Kata za Ufukoni, Magomeni na shangani Manispaa ya Mtwara Mikindani.
    [Show full text]
  • MAJADILIANO YA BUNGE ___MKUTANO WA TATU Kikao Cha
    NAKALA MTANDAO(ONLINE DOCUMENT) BUNGE LA TANZANIA ________ MAJADILIANO YA BUNGE _________ MKUTANO WA TATU Kikao cha Arobaini na Tatu – Tarehe 3 Juni, 2021 (Bunge Lilianza Saa Tatu Asubuhi) D U A Spika (Mhe. Job Y. Ndugai) Alisoma Dua SPIKA: Waheshimiwa Wabunge, naomba tukae. Waheshimiwa Wabunge, tunaendelea na Mkutano wetu wa Tatu, leo ni Kikao cha Arobaini na Tatu. Katibu NDG. NENELWA MWIHAMBI, ndc – KATIBU WA BUNGE: HATI ZA KUWASILISHA MEZANI Hati zifuatazo ziliwasilishwa Mezani na:- NAIBU WAZIRI WA MALIASILI NA UTALII: Randama za Makadirio ya Mapato na Matumizi ya Wizara ya Maliasili na Utalii kwa Mwaka wa Fedha 2021/2022. SPIKA: Ahsante sana Mheshimiwa Naibu Waziri wa Maliasili na Utalii, aah sasa hivi unavaa sketi ndefu, hataki ugomvi na Mgogo. (Kicheko) Tunaendelea, Katibu. 1 NAKALA MTANDAO(ONLINE DOCUMENT) NDG. NENELWA MWIHAMBI, ndc – KATIBU WA BUNGE: MASWALI KWA WAZIRI MKUU SPIKA: Maswali kwa Mheshimiwa Waziri Mkuu, Mheshimiwa Waziri Mkuu karibu sana. (Makofi) Waheshimiwa Wabunge, nawakumbusha tena kuhusu maswali ya kisera sio matukio, sio nini, ni ya kisera. Tunaanza na Mheshimiwa Mbunge wa Liwale, Mheshimiwa Zuberi Mohamed Kuchauka, maswali kwa kifupi. MHE. ZUBERI M. KUCHAUKA: Mheshimiwa Spika, ahsante kwa kunipa nafasi ya kwanza kuuliza swali kwa Mheshimiwa Waziri Mkuu. Mheshimiwa Spika, swali langu litahusu sekta ya korosho. Mwaka huu tumepata taarifa kwamba Serikali ilijipanga kutupatia pembejeo wakulima wa zao la korosho kwa maana kwamba waje kuzilipa baadaye kwenye mjengeko wa bei. Hata hivyo, kuna taharuki kubwa kwa wakulima wetu wa korosho baada ya Bodi ya Korosho kuleta waraka kwenye Halmashauri zetu, wakiwaambia kila mkulima akipeleka zao lile kwenye mnada kila kilo moja itakatwa shilingi 110 bila kujali kwamba mkulima yule amechukua pembejeo kwa kiwango gani.
    [Show full text]