DOCSLIB.ORG

Tuesday, June 7, 1994

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tuesday, June 7, 1994 VOLUME 133 NUMBER 080 1st SESSION 35th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, June 7, 1994 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent HOUSE OF COMMONS Tuesday, June 7, 1994 The House met at 10 a.m. (Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed.) _______________ * * * Prayers [English] _______________ INCOME TAX ACT ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS Mr. Paul Szabo (Mississauga South) moved for leave to introduce Bill C–256, an act to amend the Income Tax Act [Translation] (transfer of income to spouse). GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO PETITIONS (1005) Mr. Peter Milliken (Parliamentary Secretary to Leader of He said: Mr. Speaker, it is a great honour for me to present my the Government in the House of Commons): Mr. Speaker, first private member’s bill in the House of Commons. I would pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), I have the honour to table, in like to thank the member for Madawaska—Victoria for second- both official languages, the government’s response to petitions. ing my bill. * * * The bill would amend the Income Tax Act to allow one spouse to split or to pay up to $25,000 to the other spouse who is COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE managing the family home and caring for at least one dependent ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT child who has not commenced full time attendance at school. Hon. Charles Caccia (Davenport): Mr. Speaker, I have the The initiative would recognize the value of work in the family honour to present, in both official languages, the second report home and would give parents the option of providing direct of the Committee on Environment and Sustainable Develop- parental care to their children. It would allow the spouse in the ment. home to be eligible to purchase RRSPs and therefore provide a [English] more equitable retirement income opportunity. Both jobs and day care spaces would be freed up by the initiative by those who This report concerns Bill C–23, an act to implement a could now afford to leave the workforce and remain at home to convention for the protection of migratory birds in Canada and care for their children. the United States. It is a great honour to present the bill to the House. I look ABORIGINAL AFFAIRS AND NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT forward to discussing it with my colleagues to garner support for Mr. Gordon Kirkby (Prince Albert—Churchill River): Mr. what I believe is an important initiative. Speaker, I have the honour to present the first report of the (Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and Standing Committee on Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Devel- printed.) opment in both official languages. Your committee has considered Bill C–16, the Sahtu Dene and * * * Metis Land Claim Settlement Act and has agreed to report it PETITIONS without amendment. ETHANOL * * * [Translation] Mr. Rex Crawford (Kent): Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Stand- ing Order 36, I am pleased to present a petition from the MARINE TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ACT residents of Kent. Hon. Douglas Young (Minister of Transport) moved for The petitioners request that the federal government support leave to introduce Bill C–38, an Act to provide for the security an ethanol plant in the city of Chatham, Ontario, an area of marine transportation. devastated by free trade and NAFTA agreements. Jobs will be 4907 COMMONS DEBATES June 7, 1994 Supply created in sustainable development and environmentally friend- Quebecers who for whatever reason may have given up on ly agricultural outlets. federalism. The undersigned petitioners humbly pray and call on Parlia- The motion is simply a positive affirmation of the desire of ment to maintain the present exemption on the excise portion of the vast majority of Canadians to remain federally united and a ethanol for a decade, allowing for a strong and self–sufficient shorthand description of some of the characteristics which can ethanol industry in Canada. and should distinguish such a union in the future. The motion is worded generously enough and is of such positive intent that a * * * majority of the members of the House can and should support it. QUESTIONS ON THE ORDER PAPER Why do we present the motion to the House? It is because we perceive a growing vacuum on the national unity issue, a Mr. Peter Milliken (Parliamentary Secretary to Leader of leadership vacuum. If it is not filled with a positive vision of the Government in the House of Commons): Mr. Speaker, I federalism and a reasoned response to the separatist challenge, ask that all questions be allowed to stand. the danger is that it will be filled with constitutional delusions The Speaker: Shall all questions stand? and incomplete or inflammatory responses to the separatist challenge. That will harm Canada and every province and Some hon. members: Agreed. territory of Canada. _____________________________________________ The past month has provided ample evidence of the existence of this vacuum and some of the delusions and inflammations which it encourages. It is said that nature abhors a vacuum and GOVERNMENT ORDERS so should Parliament. Reformers offer this motion and a list of questions which we will be forwarding to the Prime Minister [English] later this week as our contribution toward filling this vacuum with something more constructive and forward looking. SUPPLY The Reform Party was originally created and is presently ALLOTTED DAY—NATIONAL UNITY supported by discontented federalists. [Translation] Mr. Preston Manning (Calgary Southwest) moved: That this House strongly affirm and support the desire of Canadians to remain We are discontented federalists. federally united as one people, committed to strengthening our economy, balancing the budgets of our governments, sustaining our social services, conserving our [English] environment, preserving our cultural heritage and diversity, protecting our lives and property, further democratizing our institutions and decision making processes, We got our start in the west and have gradually increased our affirming the equality and uniqueness of all our citizens and provinces, and building support across the country by appealing, for example, to people peaceful and productive relations with other peoples of the world. who are appalled at how the federal government spends money (1010 ) and accumulates debt. Our supporters are for the most part people who reject constitutional models or public policies based He said: Mr. Speaker, I rise today to speak to this motion on alleged partnerships between racial and linguistic groups and which addresses the issue of Canadian unity from a positive and who long for constitutional arrangements based on the equality federalist perspective. of all citizens and provinces. The motion has two parts: an affirmation and a description. Our supporters are for the most part people who deplore the The first part simply calls for the House to strongly affirm and lack of effective, regional representation in Ottawa and the support the desire of Canadians to remain federally united as unwillingness of the traditional federal parties even to consider, one people. Surely this is a proposition which every federalist in let alone embrace, such democratic reforms as genuine free the House can and should support. votes, citizens’ referendums and initiatives or recall. The second portion of the motion is a brief, shorthand This is just a partial list of the dissatisfactions of Reform description of what Reformers believe should be some of the supporters and hundreds of thousands of Canadians with status distinguishing characteristics of that federal union as we move quo federalism. We can therefore identify with other Canadians, into the 21st century. It is a shorthand description of a new including Quebecers, who have also become dissatisfied or Canada which our members will expand on in the course of the disillusioned with that status quo federalism. debate. This brings me to the major point of difference between Please note that there is nothing negative in the motion. The ourselves and the Bloc. Rather than reject federalism or the motion does not criticize the government so that government concept of a federal union of all Canadians, we are committed to members cannot and should not regard it as a confidence reforming federalism and overcoming the systemic problems, motion. Nor does the motion contain any implicit threat to chronic overspending, inequitable constitutional arrangements, 4908 June 7, 1994 COMMONS DEBATES Supply top down decision making and policy making, the things that To get to that destination the new economy of the 21st century have brought status quo federalism into disrepute. requires the implementation of certain public policies: fiscal policies to lower the cost of government, tax policies to pass on We have weighed both status quo federalism and separatism the benefits of this reduced cost to taxpayers and encourage job in the balance and have found both wanting. This has driven us creation, trade policies to eliminate barriers to trade including to seek for a vision of a new and better federal union of internal barriers to trade, educational and training policies to Canadians. produce an internationally competitive workforce. [Translation] To get to that destination the new economy of the 21st century may also require constitutional changing: a constitutional re- Mr. Speaker, we have evaluated separatism and the existing quirement to balance government budgets, a strengthening of federal system and we believe that both of these formulas are the federal commerce power and a new division of responsibili- imperfect. This examination has prompted us to seek a new and ties on education and training. improved federal union for Canadian citizens. Defining and getting to that new economy of the new Canada (1015 ) is far more than a constitutional exercise but it may have constitutional aspects which cannot be ignored. In this resolu- [English] tion we have used simple phrases like ‘‘strenghthening our economy ’’ as a heading. The words of the heading may seem There are two ways to bring into being a new and better vision trite and familiar but if one understands each of these shorthand of a new Canada as a federal state.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rebalanced and Revitalized: a Canada Strong
    Rebalanced and Revitalized A Canada Strong and Free Mike Harris & Preston Manning THE FRASER INSTITUTE 2006 Copyright ©2006 by The Fraser Institute. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. The authors have worked independently and opinions expressed by them are, therefore, their own, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the supporters or the trustees of The Fraser Institute. The opinions expressed in this document do not necessary represent those of the Montreal Economic Institute or the members of its board of directors. This publication in no way implies that the Montreal Economic Institute or the members of its board of directors are in favour of, or oppose the passage of, any bill. Series editor: Fred McMahon Director of Publication Production: Kristin McCahon Coordination of French publication: Martin Masse Design and typesetting: Lindsey Thomas Martin Cover design by Brian Creswick @ GoggleBox Editorial assistance provided by White Dog Creative Inc. Date of issue: June 2006 Printed and bound in Canada Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Data Harris, Mike, 945- Rebalanced and revitalized : a Canada strong and free / Mike Harris & Preston Manning Co-published by Institut économique de Montréal. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0–88975–232–X . Canada--Politics and government--2006-. 2. Government information-- Canada. 3. Political participation--Canada. 4. Federal-provincial relations-- Canada. 5. Federal government--Canada. I. Manning, Preston, 942- II. Fraser Institute (Vancouver, B.C.) III. Institut économique de Montréal IV.
    [Show full text]
  • END of an ERA Roger Gibbins Retires After 14 Years at the Helm of the Canada West Foundation
    WINDOW ON THE 2012 MAY WEST www.cwf.ca western canadian policy matters END OF AN ERA Roger Gibbins retires after 14 years at the helm of the Canada West Foundation > Unlocking Manitoba’s Transportation Gateway > Reflections on a Dynamic and Prosperous West > Natural Gas as a Transportation Fuel A Strong West in a Strong Canada The Canada West Foundation is the only think tank dedicated to being the objective voice for public policy issues of vital concern to western Canadians. Sometimes these issues are unique to the West, but more often they resonate right across Canada. We are resolutely nonpartisan. We let the research do the talking rather than rely on predetermined positions. Our goals are straightforward: better government policy; a prosperous West in a prosperous Canada; fair treatment of all regions in the federation; and a strong democracy based on open debate and meaningful citizen engagement. Over the past 40 years, our research and recommendations have advanced all four of these goals. We are a source of ideas and information. We are a facilitator of discussion and civic participation. We give the people of British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan and Manitoba a voice. A voice for their aspirations, interests and concerns. As westerners, we understand the people and the places of the West. We know our history and how it influences our future. Whether it is the economy, energy, environment, education, healthcare, taxes, social services, urban issues, intergovernmental relations or any other policy area of importance to the West, we have researched it, commented on it, stimulated debate about it and recommended practical options for improving the policy response—all from a uniquely western point of view.
    [Show full text]
  • The Limits to Influence: the Club of Rome and Canada
    THE LIMITS TO INFLUENCE: THE CLUB OF ROME AND CANADA, 1968 TO 1988 by JASON LEMOINE CHURCHILL A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2006 © Jason Lemoine Churchill, 2006 Declaration AUTHOR'S DECLARATION FOR ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF A THESIS I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract This dissertation is about influence which is defined as the ability to move ideas forward within, and in some cases across, organizations. More specifically it is about an extraordinary organization called the Club of Rome (COR), who became advocates of the idea of greater use of systems analysis in the development of policy. The systems approach to policy required rational, holistic and long-range thinking. It was an approach that attracted the attention of Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau. Commonality of interests and concerns united the disparate members of the COR and allowed that organization to develop an influential presence within Canada during Trudeau’s time in office from 1968 to 1984. The story of the COR in Canada is extended beyond the end of the Trudeau era to explain how the key elements that had allowed the organization and its Canadian Association (CACOR) to develop an influential presence quickly dissipated in the post- 1984 era. The key reasons for decline were time and circumstance as the COR/CACOR membership aged, contacts were lost, and there was a political paradigm shift that was antithetical to COR/CACOR ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday, June 20, 1995
    VOLUME 133 NUMBER 222 1st SESSION 35th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, June 20, 1995 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent HOUSE OF COMMONS Tuesday, June 20, 1995 The House met at 10 a.m. (1005) _______________ [Translation] COMMITTEES OF THE HOUSE Prayers ENVIRONMENT _______________ Hon. Charles Caccia (Davenport, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to present, in both official languages, the fifth report ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS of the Standing Committee on the Environment and Sustainable Development, on the statutory review of the Canadian Environ- mental Protection Act. [English] The report, entitled It’s About Our Health! Towards Pollution GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO PETITIONS Prevention in English and Notre santé en dépend! Vers la prévention de la pollution in French, contains 141 recommenda- Hon. Alfonso Gagliano (Secretary of State (Parliamentary tions and is the result of 12 months of lengthy hearings held in Affairs) and Deputy Leader of the Government in the House Ottawa and all parts of the country. of Commons, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), I have the honour to table, in both official languages, the [English] government’s response to 10 petitions. The report perhaps could be summarized as urging Parliament and the government to adhere to the fact that the protection of * * * humans and ecosystems requires strong federal leadership, [Translation] including national standards and mirror legislation in close co–operation with provinces and territories. INTERPARLIAMENTARY DELEGATIONS I thank the members of all parties for their co–operation and Mr. Don Boudria (Glengarry—Prescott—Russell, Lib.): full commitment in the production of this report. I thank the Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Docket 119 Synthesis Iof Comments on the Review.Pdf
    i ii Synthesis of Public Comment on the Forthcoming Review by the Federal Governments of Canada and the United States of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement A Report to the Governments of the United States and Canada January 2006 The views expressed in this synthesis are those of the individuals and organizations who participated in the public comment process. They are not the views of the International Joint Commission. INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION JOINT MIXTE COMMISSION INTERNATIONALE Canada and United States Canada et États-Unis INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION JOINT MIXTE COMMISSION INTERNATIONALE Canada and United States Canada et États-Unis Herb Gray Dennis Schornack Chair, Canadian Section Chair, United States Section Robert Gourd Irene Brooks Commissioner Commissioner Jack Blaney Allen Olson Commissioner Commissioner International Joint Commission Offices Canadian Section United States Section 234 Laurier Ave. West, 22nd Floor 1250 23rd Street, NW, Suite 100 Ottawa, ON K1P 6K6 Washington, D.C. 20440 Phone: (613) 995-2984 Phone: (202) 736-9000 Fax: (613) 993-5583 Fax: (202) 467-0746 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Great Lakes Regional Office 100 Ouellette Avenue, 8th Floor Windsor, ON N9A 6T3 or P.O. Box 32869, Detroit, MI 48232 Phone: (519) 257-6700 or (313) 226-2170 Fax: (519) 257-6740 Email: [email protected] Acknowledgements The International Joint Commission thanks the people from the Great Lakes, the St. Lawrence River and beyond who took part in the public comment process and whose voices are echoed in this report. ISBN 1-894280-60-1 This report is available online at www.ijc.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..96 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 17.25)
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 138 Ï NUMBER 121 Ï 2nd SESSION Ï 37th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, September 17, 2003 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 7449 HOUSE OF COMMONS Wednesday, September 17, 2003 The House met at 2 p.m. Ï (1405) TERRORISM Mr. Kevin Sorenson (Crowfoot, Canadian Alliance): Mr. Prayers Speaker, a security expert recently stated that Canada is providing a “veneer of legitimacy” to the terrorist activities of the Tamil Tigers by failing to outlaw the group as the United States, Great Britain and [English] Australia have done. The Speaker: As is our practice on Wednesday we will now sing Almost a year ago the RCMP reported that 8,000 Tamil Tigers O Canada, and we will be led by the hon. member for Ancaster— involved in extortion, intimidation and the smuggling of migrants Dundas—Flamborough—Aldershot. were operating in the Toronto area. Based on evidence that the Tamil Tigers raise several millions of dollars a year in Canada to purchase [Editor's Note: Members sang the national anthem] weapons to foster their terrorist activities, CSIS has repeatedly warned the federal government to outlaw this terrorist organization. Despite this overwhelming evidence from security and intelli- gence agencies, the Solicitor General refuses to outlaw the Tamil STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS Tigers. He does so at great risk to the nation. I implore the Solicitor General to finally do the right thing and outlaw the Tamil Tigers. Ï (1355) [English] *** HEALTH JOHN STEVENS Hon. Hedy Fry (Vancouver Centre, Lib.): Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Publication
    CANADA Canada Institute INSTITUTE JANUARY 2006 Occasional Paper Series The Foreign and THE PROVINCE OF QUEBEC held a referendum on separation from Canada on October 30, 1995. It was not the first time this issue had been Defense Policies of brought before the provincial electorate, but this time the proposal was only narrowly defeated. For the first time, a majority of francophones voted for an Independent separation. The separatists lost because anglophones and speakers of other lan- guages voted overwhelmingly against separation, and their votes were just Quebec barely sufficient to tip the balance. The result strengthened the separatists and endowed them with a sense of momentum—while English-speaking DWIGHT N. MASON Canadians were left with pessimism about the future of the country. The two sides’ conflicting visions of Canada seemed impossible to reconcile. The referendum results raised the real possibility that Quebec might soon become independent, either through agreement with Canada or unilaterally. This outcome now seems unlikely, but the issue is not going to disappear. Ten years later, there remains a hard core of separatists. Their position has been strengthened, for the moment at least, by the growing number of scandals, prin- cipally the “sponsorship” scandal, engulfing the Liberal Party of Canada. The essence of the sponsorship scandal is the allegation that persons close to the Liberal government of former Prime Minister Jean Chrétien (and perhaps to the current Paul Martin government) used federal funds for partisan purposes in Quebec, among them to weaken support for separatism in the province. These activities allegedly included bribery and kickbacks.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Canada Presented By: Dr
    The New Canada Presented by: Dr. Darrell Bricker © 2018 Darrell Bricker. All rights reserved. Contains Proprietary information and insights may not be disclosed or reproduced without the prior written consent of the presenter. © 2018 Ipsos We Don’t Know Our Own Country Anymore © 2018 Ipsos 2 The Forces of Change Are Creating a New Canada © 2018 Ipsos 3 The Old Canada • The “Great White North” • English and French—very white • More Rural—focus on natural resources • Big families, big households, what the kids want • Values Of Elite Accommodation— driven by white men in Toronto, Montreal and Ottawa • Eyes on the Atlantic, fear of the US. • Trusting Of Public Authorities And Institutions — (Peace, Order and Good Government) © 2018 Ipsos 4 POPULATION PATTERNS © 2018 Ipsos 5 EMERGING DEMOGRAPHIC FORCES Fertility/Aging Urbanization Multiculturalism © 2018 Ipsos 6 FERTILITY © 2018 Ipsos 7 Historical Age Pyramid for Canada MALE FEMALE 2011 2011 1961 1961 © 2018 Ipsos 8 THE FERTILITY RATE DROP Fertility Rate, Canada: 1921 – 2011 (average number of children a woman aged 15 to 49 would have in her lifetime) © 2018 Ipsos 9 DECLINE EVERYWHERE 2011 Total Fertility Rate Canada 1.61 Saskatchewan 1.99 Manitoba 1.86 Alberta 1.81 Quebec 1.69 Prince Edward Island 1.62 New Brunswick 1.54 Ontario 1.52 Nova Scotia 1.47 Newfoundland/Labrador 1.45 British Columbia 1.42 © 2018 Ipsos 10 WORLD VS CANADA: FERTILITY RATES WORLD CANADA 1960 = 4.9 1960 = 3.9 Today = 2.5 Today = 1.6 2050 = 2.3 2050 = 1.7 United Nations Population Estimates © 2018 Ipsos 11 FERTILITY IN 10 BIGGEST COUNTRIES CUT BY HALF IN LAST HALF CENTURY China 5.80 1.7 India 5.90 2.5 US 3.70 1.9 Indonesia 5.70 2.5 Brazil 6.20 Avg.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents STOCKWELL DAY’S MISALLIANCE Introduction .......................................................................................................... 5 An Image Problem ................................................................................................ 7 The Best Laid Plans................................................................................................8 Four Points of View..............................................................................................12 Discussion, Research, and Essay Questions ..........................................................16 STOCKWELL DAY’S MISALLIANCE Introduction Just over a year after his dramatic entrance The months following the election pre- into federal politics, Canadian Alliance sented Day with one headache after another. leader Stockwell Day was facing an uncer- An embarrassing character-defamation tain political future in the summer of 2001. lawsuit brought against him by an Alberta The former Alberta provincial Cabinet lawyer, questions about the responsibility for minister had been the focus of great hopes the province’s taxpayers for paying his legal and expectations among many on Canada’s bills arising from it, allegations that the party political right as the dynamic new leader who had hired a spy to investigate the Liberals, might be able to wrest power from Jean and intemperate attacks on the actions of a Chrétien’s governing Liberals. Day had Quebec judge all focused considerable easily won the Alliance leadership race over negative attention on Day and cast further former Reform Party chief Preston Manning doubts on his leadership. But all of these in July 2000 and took his seat in the House of problems paled in comparison to the full- Commons following a by-election win in scale party revolt that erupted in April 2001, British Columbia two months later. But when some of his most senior MPs an- within weeks of his arrival in Ottawa, nounced that they had lost confidence in his Chrétien had called a federal election, and ability to lead the Alliance.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday, June 1, 1994
    VOLUME 133 NUMBER 076 1st SESSION 35th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, June 1, 1994 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent HOUSE OF COMMONS Wednesday, June 1, 1994 The House met at 2 p.m. and not merely wishful thinking, and urge the CBC to provide adequate television coverage of our disabled athletes at the next _______________ Summer Games. Prayers In doing so, we will express the admiration and respect which their exceptional achievements deserve. _______________ * * * STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS [English] [English] BILLS C–33 AND C–34 LAW OF THE SEA Mr. John Duncan (North Island—Powell River): Mr. Speaker, yesterday we had the introduction of Bills C–33 and Hon. Charles Caccia (Davenport): Mr. Speaker, straddling C–34 which would ratify land claims and self–government the 200 nautical mile limit there is a fish stock which is of great agreements in Yukon. Last week we were told the government importance to the existence and well–being of many coastal wished to have these bills introduced later in June with the communities in Atlantic Canada. understanding that MPs would have time to prepare properly. Designed to avoid crisis in the fisheries, the law of the sea These bills represent the culmination of 21 years of mostly affirms the responsibility of all nations to co–operate in con- behind closed doors work without the involvement of federal serving and managing fish in the high seas. It is in the interests parliamentarians. Today, 24 hours after tabling, Parliament is of Canadians that the Government of Canada ratify the law of being asked to debate these bills at second reading.
    [Show full text]
  • Friday, October 4, 1996
    CANADA VOLUME 134 S NUMBER 081 S 2nd SESSION S 35th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, October 4, 1996 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) The House of Commons Debates are also available on the Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 5097 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, October 4, 1996 The House met at 10 a.m. D (1005) _______________ I would like to talk about an individual case that happened in my own constituency which has ramifications for this bill. Many Prayers members of Parliament will probably be able to relate to stories like this because we all have situations which we confront from day _______________ to day. This constituent’s name is Carol. She was married to an abusive husband. Her story is really the plight of thousands of women, and GOVERNMENT ORDERS even some men I suppose, across Canada. Day in and day out they live in silent fear, not just fear of abuse, but in Carol’s case fear for [English] her own life. She was badly beaten by her husband in 1993. She did the right thing, the one which I always encourage spouses in CRIMINAL CODE abusive situations to do, and that is to get in touch with the police. She called the police and her husband was charged. The House resumed from October 3, consideration of the motion that Bill C-55, an act to amend the Criminal Code (high risk Unfortunately, as is often the case this made her husband very offenders), the Corrections and Conditional Release Act, the angry.
    [Show full text]
  • It-Tlettax-Il Leġiżlatura Pl 1090
    IT-TLETTAX-IL LEĠIŻLATURA P.L. 1090 Dokument imqiegħed fuq il-Mejda tal-Kamra tad-Deputati fis-Seduta Numru 74 tal-25 ta’ Jannar 2018 mill-Ispeaker, l-Onor. Anġlu Farrugia. ___________________________ Raymond Scicluna Skrivan tal-Kamra 24th Conference of Speakers and Presiding Officers of the Commonwealth (CSPOC) 8-13 January 2018 Seychelles Hon Anglu Farrugia, Speaker RAPPORT LILL-ISPEAKER DWAR PARTECIPAZZJONI F'KONFERENZA/LAQGMA/ZJARA TA' NATURA PARLAMENTARI BARRA MINN MALT A 1. TITLU TAL-KONFERENZA/LAQGMA: 24TH CONFERENCE OF SPEAKERS AND PRESIDING OFFICERS OF THE COMMONWEALTH 2. DATA: 8-13 TA' JANNAR 2018 3. ISEM IL-MEMBRU /I LI PPARTECIPAW: Speaker Anglu Farrugia 4. SUGGETT /1 FUQ L-AGENDA: KOPJA TAL-PROGRAMM ANNESS MA' DAN IR-RAPPORT (ANNESS I) 5. KONKLUZJONIJIET TAL-LAQGMA, JEKK IKUN IL-KAZ: Fil-bidu tal-konferenza, uhud mill-partedpanti li huma membri fil-lnunitat permanenti iltaqghu ghall­ i. laqgha annwali taghhom. Malta hi patti minn dan il-kutnitat bhala raprezentanti tal-gzejjer Brittanid u r-Regjun tal-Mediterran. F'din il-laqgha giet diskussa !-agenda proposta ghall-konferenza, u gew diskussi 1-possibilitajiet ta' fejn jistghu jigu organizzati 1-laqghat u 1-konferenzi li jmiss. r· Il-konferenza kienet forma ta' diskussjonijiet imqassma fsezzjonijiet u workshops, fejn gew maghzula 1-kelliema, li kienu Speakers minn pajjizi varji tal-Commonwealth biex jaghmlu 1-Indirizz Ewlieni. Speakers ohra gew maghzula sabiex jaghmlu indirizzi iqsar ftl-workshops li segwew. Is-sezzjonijiet kienu mqassma kif gej: " 1. The role rif the Speaker in strengthening Parliamentary diplomacy in both regional and international moperation 2. Use rif technolof!Y to support lVIembers and House Business 3.
    [Show full text]