DOCSLIB.ORG

ROMA Ve BİZANS ETÜDLER VE SİSTEMATİK ESERLER

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ROMA Ve BİZANS ETÜDLER VE SİSTEMATİK ESERLER ROMA ve BİZANS ETÜDLER VE SİSTEMATİK ESERLER ALBERT, GOTTFRIED: Die Prinzeninsel Antigoni und der Aidos- Berg. Konstantinopel, O. Keil, [1891]. s. 24-51. (15.5x22). “Mitteilungen des Deutschen Excursions Clubs, Heft III”. [I.RB/E-367] ANGOLD, MICHAEL: Church and society in Byzantium under the Comneni, 1081-1261. Cambridge, Cambridge University, 1995. XVI+604 s. (15.5x23.5). [I.RB/E-388] BALARD, MİCHEL - DUCELLIER, ALAIN (Der.) : Konstantinopolis 1054-1261. Hırıstiyanlığın başı, Latinlerin avı, Yunan başkenti. İstanbul, İletişim, 2002. 256 s. (16x23). “İletişim Yay.: 842 - Dünya Şehirleri Dizisi: 6”. [I.RB/E-405] BARSANTI, CLAUDIA : Constantinopoli e l’Egeo nei primi decenni del XV secolo: la testimonianza di Cristoforo Buondelmonti. s. 83-254. (21x29). Roma, Rivista dell’Istituto Nazionale d’Archeologia e Storia dell’arte, 56 (III. Serie, XXIV), 2001’den. Fotokopidir. [I.RB/E-407] BARTUSIS, MARK C.: The late Byzantine army: arms and society, 1204-1453. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1992. XVII+438 s. (15x23) resim. “The Middle Ages Series”. [I.RB/E-408] 1 BASSETT, SARAH GUBERTI : Historiae custos: Sculpture and tradition in the Baths of Zeuxippos. s. 491-506. (21x29.5) plan, resim. American Journal of Archaeology Volume, 100, No: 3/1996’dan. Fotokopidir. [I.RB/E-391] BELGE, MURAT : Bizans mirası. Foto.: Şemsi Güner. s. 86-102. (22x30) resim. Atlas dergisi, 1994, (Sayı 17)’de. [I.RB/E-392] BOOJAMRA, JOHN LAWRENCE : Church reform in the late Byzantine Empire. A study for the patriarchate of Athanasios of Constantinople. Thessaloniki, Patriarchal Institute for Patristic Studies, 1983. 239 s. (18x25). “Analekta Vlatadon, 35”. [I.RB/E-362] BRADFORD, ERNLE : The great betrayal. Constantinople 1204. London, White Lion, 1975. 223 s. (14x22.5) resim. [I.RB/E-389] BRYER, ANTHONY – LOWRY, NEATH (Ed.) : Continuity and change in the late Byzantine society. Papers given at a Symposium at Dumbarton Oaks in May 1982. Birmingham, the University of Birmingham Centre for Byzantine Studies; Washington, Dumbarton Oaks, 1986. VII+343 s. (15x21) 1 katl. harita, resim. [I.RB/E-336] CAMERON, ALAN : Literature and society in the early Byzantine world. [Repr. of the articles of the author]. London, Variorum Reprints, 1985. 350 s. (16x23) 1 portre. [I.RB/E-342] 2 CANTACUZENE, JEAN MICHEL : Mille ans dans les Balkans. Chronique des Cantacuzène dans la tourmente des siècles. Paris, Christian, [1992]. 494+VI s.(16x24) 8 planş, harita. [I.RB/E-378] CLARI, ROBERT DE : İstanbul’un zaptı (1204). Çev.: Beynun Ak- yavaş. Ankara, Atatürk Kültür, Dil ve Tarih Yüksek Kurumu, Türk Tarih Kurumu, 1994. VIII+54 s. (16.5x23.5). “Atatürk Kültür, Dil ve Tarih Yüksek Kurumu Türk Tarih Kurumu Yay., X. Dizi Sa. 16”. [I.RB/E-383] DAGRON, GILBERT : Constantinople imaginaire. Etudes sur le recueil des Patria. Paris, P.U.F., 1984. 358 s. (18x22.5) 4 planş. “Bibliothèque Byzantine, Etudes: 8”. [I.RB/E-352] DIETEN, JAN LOUIS VAN : Geschichte der Patriarchen von Sergios I. bis Johannes VI. (610-715). Amsterdam, Adolf M. Hakkert, 1972. XIX+241 s. (18x25). “Enzyklopadie der Byzantinistik, Bd. 24”. [I.RB/E-361] DİRİMTEKİN, FERİDUN : Adduction de l’eau à Byzance dans la région dite Bulgarie. Paris, Cahiers Archéologiques, “t.y.”. 217-243 s. (20x27) resim. [I.RB/E-142] DVORNIK, FRANCIS : The idea of apostolicity in Byzantium and the legend of the Apostle Andrew. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1958. X+342 s. (17x24). “Dumbarton Oaks Studies: IV”. [I.RB/E-364] 3 EICKHOFF, EKKEHARD : Macht und Sendung. Byzantinische Weltpolitik. Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta, 1981. 179 s. (14x22) harita, resim, renkli resim. [I.RB/E-332] EICKHOFF, EKKEHARD : Seekrieg und Seepolitik zwischen Islam und Abendland. Das Mittelmeer unter byzantinischer und arabischer Hegemonie (650-1040). Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, 1966. XI+438 s. (17x24) cepte katl. harita. [I.RB/E-359] EVANS, DAVID BEECHER : Leontius of Byzantium. An Origenist christology. Washington, Dumbarton Oaks, 1970. XIII+206 s. (17x24). “Dumbarton Oaks Studies: XIII”. [I.RB/E-363] EVERY, GEORGE : The Byzantine Patriarchate 451-1204. London, Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, 1947. 212 s. (14x22) harita, resim. [I.RB/E-365] GEANAKOPULOS, DENO JOHN : Emperor Michael Palaeologus and the West (1258-1282). A study in Byzantine-Latin relations. Connecticut, Archon Books, 1973. XII+[2]+434 s. (16x23.5). [I.RB/E-358] GIBBON, EDWARD : Bizans. Roma İmparatorluğu’nun gerileyiş ve çöküş tarihi. Cilt V, kitap 2. Çev. Asım Baltacıgil. İstanbul Arkeoloji ve Sanat, 1995. 187-358+[56] s. (14x20). “Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yay. Deneme, Eleştiri ve Tarih Dizisi: 16 - Bizans: 2”. [I.RB/E-400] 4 GIBBON, EDWARD : Decline and fall of the Roman Empire. 6 vols. London, J.M.Dent, 1986-1988. (12x19). Vol. 1: XX+500 s. / Vol. 2: VI+523 s. / Vol. 3: VI+462 s. / Vol. 4: VI+534 s. / Vol. 5: VI+590 s. / Vol. 6: VIII+600 s. [I.RB/E-346-351] GIBBON, EDWARD : Bizans. Roma İmparatorluğu’nun gerileyiş ve çöküş tarihi. C. IV. Çev.: Asım Baltacıgil. İstanbul, Arkeoloji ve Sanat 1994. 185+42 s. (14x20). “Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yay. Deneme, Eleştiri ve Tarih Dizisi: 12 – Bizans: 1”. [I.RB/E-397, 398, 399] GOUILLARD, JEAN : La vie religieuse à Byzance. [Réimp. de divers articles de l’auteur]. London, Variorum Reprints, 1981. 364 s. (16x23) 1 portre. [I.RB/E-341] GRANT, MICHAEL : Roma’dan Bizans’a. İ.S. 5. yüzyıl. Çev.: Z. Zühre İlkgelen. İstanbul, Homer Kitabevi, 2000. VII+223 s. (14x21.5). [I.RB/E-406] GROUSSET, RENE : L’empire du Levant. Histoire de la question d’Orient. Paris, Payot, 1992. 648 s. (14x22.5) harita. [I.RB/E-370] GUNTHER, VON PAIRIS : The capture of Constantinople: the Hystoria Constantinopolitana of Gunther of Pairis. Ed. and tr. by Alfred J. Andrea. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1997. XIV+194 s. (14x21.5). [I.RB/E-393] 5 HEISENBERG, AUGUST : Quellen und Studien zur spätbyzantinischen Geschichte. [Repr. of the articles of the author.] London, Variorum Reprints, 1973. 400 s. (16x23) 1 portre. [I.RB/E-340] HUSSEY, J.M. : The orthodox Church in the Byzantine Empire. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1986. XX+408 s. (16x24). [I.RB/E-355] İREÇEK, KONSTANTİN YOSİF : Belgrad-İstanbul-Roma askerî yolu. Bulgarca’dan çev.: Ali Kemal Balkanlı. Ankara, Kültür Bakan- lığı, 1990. XIV+201 s. (13.5x19.5). “Kültür Bakanlığı Yay.: 1193 – Tercüme Eserler Dizisi: 81”. [I.RB/E-401] JAGER, M. L’ABBE : Histoire de Photius, patriarche de Constantinople. Accompagnée d’une introduction, de notes historiques et de pièces justificatives. 2. éd. Paris, Aug. Vaton, 1845. XLIV+468 s. (12x18.5). [I.RB/E-379] JANIN, R. : Les ports de Constantinople sur la Propontide. Extrait de Byzantion, t. XX (1950). Bruxelles, 1950. s. 73-79. (16x24). [I.RB/E-374] KAPLAN, MICHEL : Les propriétés de la Couronne et de l’Eglise dans l’Empire byzantin (V-VI siècles). Documents. Paris, Sorbonne, 1976. 88 s. (16x24). “Byzantina Sorbonensia, 2”. [I.RB/E-335] 6 KAROLIDIS, PAVLOS : Romanos Diogenis. İstanbul’a yollar açılırken. Çev.: Kriton Dinçmen. İstanbul, İletişim, 1993. 77 s. (16x23). “İletişim Yay.: 239 – İstanbul Dizisi: 12”. [I.RB/E-372] KAZHDAN, A. P. - EPSTEIN, ANN WHARTON : Change in Byzantine culture in the eleventh and twelfth centuries. Berkeley, University of California Press, [c1985]. XXII+287 s. (16x24) 16 planş. [I.RB/E-334] KAZHDAN, ALEXANDER – CONSTABLE, GILES : People and power in Byzantium. An introduction to modern Byzantine studies. Washington, Dumbarton Oaks, 1982. XXI+218 s. (16x23). [I.RB/E-356] KOMNENA, ANNA : Alexiad. Anadolu’da ve Balkan Yarımadası’nda İmparator Alexios Komnenos dönemi’nin tarihi. Malazgirt’in sonrası. Çev.: Bilge Umar. İstanbul, İnkılâp Kitabevi, 1996. 568 s. (16x23.5). [I.RB/E-384] KONYA, CENGİZHAN : Mehmed Ziya Bey’in “İstanbul ve Boğaziçi” eserinin, I. c., 171-351. sayfaların arasındaki bölümün dizini. (İ.Ü.E.F. Yeniçağ Tarihi Kürsüsü, Mezuniyet Tezi, 1971). İstanbul, 1971. 81 y. (22x29). [I.RB/E-353] KOROMILA, MARIANNA : İ istati agona tis Vizantinis protevusas =Bizans başkentinin son çırpınması. Atina, Panorama, 1992. 54 s. (21.5x30) resim. [I.RB/E-373] 7 LAIOU, ANGELIKIE .: Constantinople and the Latins. The foreign policy of Andronicus II (1282-1326). Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1972. [10]+390 s. (17.5x24.5). [I.RB/E-357] LEARY, FRANCIS : The last days of Constantinople (II). Night falls on Byzantium. s. 32-49. International History Magazine, sayı 12, 1973’de. [I.RB/E-369] LIMBERIS, VASILIKI : Divine Heiress: the Virgin Mary and the creation of Christian Constantinople. London and New York, Routledge, 1994. X+199 s. (14x22). [I.RB/E-387] MACRI, CHRISTO M. : Des Byzantins et des étrangers dans Constantinople au Moyen-Age. Paris, R.Guillon, 1928. 118+[1] s. (11x18). [I.RB/E-337] MANGO, CYRIL A. : The Byzantine inscriptions of Constantinople: A bibliographical survey. s. 52-66. (21x30). Repr. from American Journal of Archaeology, January 1951, Vol. LV, No: 1’den. Makalenin fotokopisidir. [I.RB/E-385] MANGO, CYRIL : Studies on Constantinople. Hampshire, Variorum, 1993. XII+274 s. (17x25). [I.RB/E-386] 8 MARRAST, AUGUSTIN : La vie byzantine au VI. siècle. Préf. et commentaires par Adrien Planté. Paris, Ernest Thorin, 1881. XXXV+ 454 s. (16x25). [I.RB/E-360] MIJATOVICH, CHEDOMIL : Constantine Palaeologus, the last emperor of the Greeks 1448-1453. The conquest of Constantinople by the Turks. Chicago, Argonaut, 1968. XIV+239 s. (14.5x21.5) 1 harita. [I.RB/E-390] MORDTMANN, A. : Die Avaren und Perser von Konstantinopel. Konstantinopel, O Keil, 1903. 29 s. (15.5x22.5). “Neue Folge Heft V”. [I.RB/E-366] MORDTMANN, A. : Die Hafenquartiere von Byzanz. Konstantino- pel, O. Keil, [1891]. 24 s. (15.5x22). “Mitteilungen des Deutschen Excursions Clubs, Heft III”. [I.RB/E-367] NIAVIS, PAVLOS E. : The reign of the Byzantine emperor Nicephorus I (Ad 802-811). Athens, Stef. D. Basilopulos, 1987.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • David Urquhart's Holy
    Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 26, Number 36, September 10, 1999 I. The History of Britain’s ‘Great Game’ in Caucasus, Central Asia David Urquhart’s holy war by Joseph Brewda and Linda de Hoyos In 1785, a Chechen leader, Naqshbandi Sufi Sheikh Mansur, services who was touring the Caucasus, wrote in his memoirs raised the Chechen, Ingush, Ossetes, Kabard, Circassian, that “a Circassian prince pointed out [to me] the sacred spot and Dagestani tribes in revolt against the steady advance of (as they justly esteem it) where Daud Bey had held (just the Russian Empire into the Caucasus Mountains. Before three years ago) his meeting with the chieftains of this neigh- 1774, the Caucasus and Transcaucasus region, now embrac- borhood, and first inspired them with the idea of combining ing Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia, had been loosely themselves with the other inhabitants of the mountain prov- ruled by the Persian and Ottoman empires. After Russia’s inces as a nation, under one government and standard.” Daud victory over the Ottoman Empire in the war of 1768-74, the Bey had penned the declaration of independence of Circassia Russian military moved in on the Caucasus. Sheikh Mansur and designed its flag. raised the flag of the “Mountain Peoples” against the czar. Daud Bey was not a native of the Caucasus either. His Although Mansur’s 20,000-man force was crushed by the name was David Urquhart, and he had been sent into the Russian onslaught in 1791, Sheikh Mansur became the hero region on a special mission in 1834 by British intelligence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Empress Nurbanu and Ottoman Politics in the Sixteenth Century
    The Empress Nurbanu and Ottoman Politics in the Sixteenth Century Nurbanu (1525–1583) is one of the most prominent yet least studied royal women of the Ottoman dynasty. Her political and administrative career began when she was chosen as the favorite concubine of the crown prince Selim. Nur- banu’s authority increased when her son Murad was singled out as crown prince. By 1574, when her son, Murad III became Sultan, Nurbanu officially took on the title of Valide Sultan, or Queen Mother, holding the highest office of the impe- rial harem until her death in 1583. This book concentrates on the Atik Valide mosque complex, which consti- tutes the architectural embodiment of Nurbanu’s prestige, power and piety. The arrangement of the chapters is designed to enable readers to reconsider Ottoman imperial patronage practices of the late sixteenth century using the architectural enterprise of a remarkable woman as the common thread. Chapter 1 provides a general history of the wqaf institution to inform on its origins and evolution. Chapter 2 looks closely at the political dealings of Nurbanu, both in the domestic and the international sphere, building upon research concerning Ottoman royal women and power dynamics of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Chapter 3 presents a textual analysis of the written records pertaining to Nurbanu’s impe- rial mosque complex. Chapter 4 examines the distinctive physical qualities and functional features of the Atik Valide within its urban context. The book con- cludes by assessing to what extent Nurbanu was involved in the representation of her power and piety through the undertaking of her eponymous monument.
    [Show full text]
  • Karagöz Üsküdar'da Neler Görmüş?
    ULUSLARARASI ÜSKÜDAR SEMPOZYUMU VIII 21-23 Kasım 2014 B İ LDİ R İ LER C İ LT I EDİTÖRLER DR. COŞKUN YILMAZ DOÇ. DR. CENGİZ TOMAR DR. UĞUR DEMİR KÜDA ÜS R ULUSLARARASI ÜSKÜDAR SEMPOZYUMU VIII Yayın Kurulu Prof. Dr. Mehmet Âkif Aydın / Dr. Coşkun Yılmaz Prof. Dr. Mehmet İpşirli / Prof. Dr. Ahmet Emre Bilgili Prof. Dr. Erhan Afyoncu / Prof. Dr. Mustafa S. Küçükaşcı Prof. Dr. Halis Yunus Ersöz İmla ve Tashih Yrd. Doç. Dr. Ahmet Karataş Fotoğraf Üsküdar Belediyesi / SMEY Kenan Koca / A. Bilal Arslan / A. Fatih Yılmaz M. Esat Coşkun / Tebliğ Sahipleri Tasarım SMEY Grafik Uygulama Ender Boztürk Renk Ayrımı Bülent Avnamak Baskı Cilt Dörtbudak Yayınları Mecidiyeköy Mah. Kervangeçmez Sk. İnci Apt. Şişli/İst. İstanbul 2015 ISBN 978-605-84934-9-0 (Tk) ISBN 978-605-9719-00-1 (1.c) Telif Hakları Üsküdar Belediyesi’ne aittir. ÜSKÜDAR BELEDİYESİ Mimar Sinan Mah. Hakimiyet-i Milliye Cad. No: 35 Üsküdar/İstanbul Tel. +90 (216) 531 30 00 • +90 (216) 531 31 03 www.uskudar.bel.tr KARAGÖZ ÜSKÜDAR’DA NELER GÖRMÜŞ? PROF. DR. FETHİ GEDİ KLİ İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Bu bildiride S. F. (Sin Fe)nin kaleme aldığı Karagöz Neler Görmüş? Karagöz Üsküdarda adlı kitapçığı tahlil edip sonra da metni Latin harfleriyle vereceğiz. İstanbul’da 1 (11)da Yeni Osmanlılar Matbaası’nda basılan 1 sayfadan ibaret bu kitapçıkta yazar, Karagöz ve Hacıvat’ı vapurla Üsküdar’ı gezmeğe çıkarır. Bu seyahatte Karagöz ile Ha- cıvat Üsküdar’ın dikkat çeken yerlerini gezerler ve Kız Kulesi, Şemsi Paşa, Tımarhane, Üsküdar adının kökü, Nurbanu Valide Sultan ve şair Sirrî-i Üsküdarî hakkında konu- şarak okuyucuya bilgi verirler.
    [Show full text]
  • TURKIYE T a R I H I Ba§Langicindan Zamammiza Kadar
    TURKIYE T A R i H i Ba§langicindan Zamammiza Kadar rURKlYE TARÍHi T. YILMAZ ÓZTUNA 3. CiLT Hayal KÍTAPLARI TARIH SERÜsi 1 (Ciit 3 ) Ka pak Rc^mi: Bursa’da Miirádíur Camii \H47) Bu l'.ilep, HAVAT YAVINLARI A. S. Bdina TifciVuk MathDncilik Ssnayii A, Ç. MatbsesiVids, 1964 yihnda bssi'iiiijtir. D iird iin c s ii l€itca|B Ortaçag Osmanli Türkiyesi CÌ281--I453] '•Ve hem Peygaìnher aleyhi's-selâm zamànina ya- kiyn samànûa Bayat Coyundan Korkut Ata kopdu. Oguz kavminin bilgesiydi. Her derse olurdu. Gaaibden haberler sôylerdi. Hakk Ta’âlà anin gonlüne ilhdm ederdi. Ayitdi: 'à’hir zamanda gerü hânlik Kayi’ya de- ge, dahi kimesne ellerinden almaya’ dedi. Dedigi Os­ mân rahmetu’llaah neslidir" ( Yazicioglu Ali, Târih-t Àl-i Selçuk, Topkapi Sarayi, Revân-Koskü Küt., 1. 390, s. 26). “À’hir zamânda hânlik geri Kayi’ya dege, kimse el­ lerinden almaya... Bu deciigi Osmân neslidir, iÿde sürüp gidiyor» (Kitâb-i Dede Korkut alâ Lisdn-i Tâife-i Ogu- zân, Mukaddime). “Korkut Ata'dan nakl ederler ki, demismi^ ki: ‘hânlik Oguz Hân vasiyyeti mû'cibince à’hir Kayi Hân evlàdi'na düsse gerekdir; tâ ktyâmet'e denlü ol ne&il- den almasa gerekdir’ ” (Edirneli Rûhî, Târih i Âl-i Os­ mân, MOG, II, 132-40’dan naklen). "Kadim u’z-zamân Türkmen kabâili beyninde Kor­ kut Ata nâm bir ehl-i hâl 'o.ziz vardi. Birgiin buyurdu ki: ‘Saltanat akibet Oguz Hân’in vasiyyeti üzere oglu Kayï Hân evlàdina nakl edip ilâ à'hiri'z-zamân ber-de- vâm olur’ ” (Müneccim-Basi, SahâîJu'l-Akhbûr, III , 2.57).
    [Show full text]
  • Running Head: Correspondence of Ottoman Women
    Correspondence of Ottoman Women 1 Running head: Correspondence of Ottoman Women The Correspondence of Ottoman Women during the Early Modern Period (16th-18th centuries): Overview on the Current State of Research, Problems, and Perspectives Marina Lushchenko Department of French, Hispanic and Italian Studies University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada Correspondence of Ottoman Women 2 Abstract My main goal is to investigate problems and possible perspectives related to studies in Ottoman women’s epistolarity (16th-18th centuries). The paper starts with a review of the current state of research in this area. I then go on to discuss some of the major problems confronting researchers. Ottoman female epistolarity also offers many directions that future research may take. A socio-historical approach contributes to shed new light on the roles Ottoman women played within the family and society. A cultural approach or a gender-based approach can also provide interesting insight into Ottoman women’s epistolarity. Moreover, the fast computerization of scholarly activity suggests creating an electronic archive of Ottoman women’s letters in order to attract the attention of a wider scholarly audience to this field of research. Correspondence of Ottoman Women 3 INTRODUCTION In recent years researchers working in the field of gender studies have started to pay special attention to the place that letter-writing held in early modern women’s lives. As a source, letters provide, indeed, an incomparable insight into women’s thoughts, emotions and experiences, and help to make important advances towards a better understanding and evaluation of female education and literacy, social and gender interactions as well as roles played by women within the family circle, in society and, often, on the political stage.
    [Show full text]
  • Behice Tezçakar Özdemir [email protected]
    CURRICULUM VITÆ Turkish-German University Faculty of Economics & Administrative Sciences Department of Political Sciences and International Relations POL 550-551 Behice Tezçakar Özdemir www.behiceozdemir.com [email protected] General Overview Behice Tezçakar Özdemir who is an author, history researcher, professional expert on industry history and journalist born and raised in Bosphorus (Istanbul). She received her B.A in History as a valedictorian of Istanbul Bilgi University. She got the Master’s Degree from History Department of Boğaziçi University. She specialized on the Turkish- German industrial relations and the roles of German enterprises and companies on the industrial developments of Ottoman territories including today’s Turkey, Middle East and Balkans. Her research book ‘Discovery of Oil in the Minds and Lands of the Ottoman Empire’ is published internationally (2009). Özdemir is co-writer for ‘Daheim in Konstantinopel-Deutch Spuren am Bosporus ab 1850- Memleketimiz Dersaadet 1850’den itibaren Boğaziçi’nde Alman izleri’ published by Pagma Verlag in Germany (2013). Her last research book ‘History of Siemens from Empire to Republic - In the Light of Documents from State Archives’ was published for Siemens 160th anniversary (2016). In that work she examined different territories of Ottoman Empire like Constantinople, Baghdad, Basra, Fao, Sudan, Mosul, Aleppo, Tripoli, Rhodes, Thessalonica on behalf of the industrial activities in different sectors like communications, mobility, energy and industry, defense, cities and building technologies, human resources and healthcare. In 2018, she conducted the research project of Thyssen Krupp and she prepared a book that covered the defense, iron and steel industry services of the Germans through the company of Thyssen Krupp, in Ottoman lands (in the Balkans, Asia Minor, the Middle East and North Africa ) during the Prussian period.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Cinema in the Ottoman Empire
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Performing modernity: Atatürk on film (1919-1938) Dinç, E. Publication date 2016 Document Version Final published version Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Dinç, E. (2016). Performing modernity: Atatürk on film (1919-1938). General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:24 Sep 2021 Chapter 1 Early Cinema in the Ottoman Empire The aim of this chapter is to arrive at an understanding of the specific meanings of cinema in the Ottoman context in which Atatürk grew up, by comparing the early history of cinema in Europe and the US with the history of cinema in the Ottoman Empire in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. By placing Atatürk in his historical context, more specifically his social and cultural milieu, the chapter intends to reveal the general framework within which his ideas on cinema emerged.
    [Show full text]
  • Enver Paşa Enver Pasha 1881-1922 Ernestine Reiser
    kim kimdir? who is who? 401 Enver Paşa Enver Pasha 1881-1922 İstanbul doğumlu, Gagavuz kökenli Osmanlı askeri, Born in Istanbul, Ottoman soldier of Gagauz origin. While still siyasetçi. İkincilikle bitirdiği Harbiye’de henüz öğrenciyken a student at the Military Academy, from which he graduated “devleti kurtarma” idealiyle siyasete eğilim göstermeye ranking the second, he started to get involved in politics with başladı (1902). 1908’de subay arkadaşlarıyla birlikte, Sultan the ideal of “saving the country” (1902). In 1908, he joined his II. Abdülhamid iktidarına meşruti yönetim gayesiyle military peers in the demand for constitutional régime and took başkaldırıp dağa çıktı. İhtilalin ardından 1909’da ilan edilen to the mountains to revolt against Sultan Abdülhamid II. He meşruti idarenin en aktif ismi oldu. İttihat ve Terakki was the most active figure in the constitutional administration Partisi’nin liderlerindendi. Hem ordunun hem siyasetin announced after the coup, in 1909. He was one of the leaders parlak ismiydi. Sultan Abdülmecid’in torunu Naciye Sultan of the Union and Progress Party and a bright character in both ile evlendi, Hanedan’a damat oldu (1914). I. Dünya Savaşı the military and political arena. He married Naciye Sultan, sırasında Harbiye Nazırı ve Başkumandan Vekili’ydi. granddaughter of Sultan Abdülmecid and thus became the Türk-Alman ittifakının mimarı olarak algılanan Enver son-in-law to the Ottoman Dynasty (1914). He was the Minister Paşa, yenilginin ardından ülkeyi savaşa ittiği suçlamasıyla of War and Deputy Chief Commander during World War I. idama mahkûm edildi, rütbeleri alındı. Türk devletlerini Considered to be the architect of the Turkish-German alliance, birleştirme idealiyle Rus topraklarına kaçtı.
    [Show full text]
  • ENVIRONMENT of CULTURE and ART in the OTTOMAN EMPIRE in 19Th CENTURY
    The Online Journal of Science and Technology - April 2018 Volume 8, Issue 2 ENVIRONMENT OF CULTURE AND ART IN THE OTTOMAN th EMPIRE IN 19 CENTURY Nesli Tuğban YABAN Baskent University, Department of Public Relations and Publicity, Ankara-Turkey [email protected] Abstract: Westernisation and modernisation of the Ottoman Empire began to burgeon in the 17th century; it became evident in the 18th century and the 19th century witnessed the most intense interaction and the exact reconstruction process. New way of living which was originated in Europe and representatives thereof became influential as guides and determinants of reconstruction process in the Ottoman Empire. It is possible to point out that the Ottoman Empire which got closer to France for handling military problems, to England for industrialisation purposes and to Italy for architecture and arts had intense communication and the resulting interaction with European states in the course of reconstruction process. This study aims to give information about the social, cultural and artistic environment in the Ottoman Empire during the reign of Sultan Abdul Hamid II (1876-1909). Key Words: Culture, Art, Ottoman Empire, Sultan Abdul Hamid II. General View of the Environment of Culture and Art in 19th Century in the Ottoman Empire It is clear that sultans had a very important role in the ruling of the country as a part of state system of the Ottoman Empire thus, good or bad functioning of the state and events and actions which might affect the society from various aspects were closely connected to personality, behaviours and mentality of the sultan.
    [Show full text]
  • Formation of Watersides on the Bosporus and Spatial Development of Bosporus Waterside Gardens
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTROINCS; MECHANICAL and MECHATRONICS ENGINEERING Vol.3 Num 2 pp.(571-577) FORMATION OF WATERSIDES ON THE BOSPORUS AND SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT OF BOSPORUS WATERSIDE GARDENS Petek JAWDET ABDULLA Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Istanbul Aydin University, Florya, Istanbul/Turkey E-mail: [email protected] Abstract- As one of the unique beauties of Bosporus, Bosporus watersides have been composed and formed through long ages along the Bosporus. Not only an architectural form and a residential type, the Bosporus watersides also were being a part of the culture in which they were built. They project the life traditions of the ages in which they were built. Their users were using those buildings as summer resorts, comprised of a hall, wide rooms, kitchen and other components. The gardens of the watersides also have had their own characteristics, and they were setting out unique beauties. The gardens of the watersides in Bosporus were beyond comparison by their organizational schemes and landscape designs. The watersides were designed with a garden within the bounds of spatial possibilities. The gardens were decorated with colorful flowery plants. Many watersides, which were built in Bosporus, have reached until today. As a type of residences, these buildings are among the most important buildings of Bosporus. The Bosporus watersides have unique architectural samples and features and they need to be well preserved. However, it has been identified that some of those structures have disappeared in time. There are many causes for such a removal. By analyzing these causes, we need to preserve these buildings better nowadays. Bosporus watersides and their gardens today need a better protection by effective policies to be produced.
    [Show full text]
  • Can You List and Date the Losses of the Ottoman Empire Between 1683 -1914? the Correct Answer Is (B) False Islamic Principals ( Quran and Hadith ) Was Used To
    Egypt , Iran and Turks The Nineteenth Century MES 20 Reflections on the Middle East Prof. Hesham Issa Mohammed Abdelaal History and Conflicts Ottoman (Turkey) I Egypt I Qujar (Iran) I i>Clicker Questions Lecture and Reading Intent outcomes: Concepts in this session Knowledge The era Of Transformation! 1.The decline of the Ottoman Empire:! • Militating against the centralization of state authority! • List the Names of effective persons in the 19th • The westernization of Ottoman Empire. ! • Internal Decays and the Janissaries ! century Turkey, Egypt, Iran. • The French expedition to Egypt ! • Turkey Reform in the 19th century! • Summarize the political reform in the Middle • The Tanzemat! • Young Ottomans and Young Turks! 2.Egypt Reform in the 19th century ! east 19th Century. • Muhammed Ali Pasha Era and the urban reform! • The British Occupation ! • Describe the reasons for the decline of • The Nationalism period ! 3.Iran reforms in the 19th century ! • Change in Iranian Shi’ism after the Safavids and the rise of " Ottoman empire. Qujar density and the Ulama! • The effect of European Imperialism ! Comprehension • The Constitutional Revolution The decline of the Ottoman Empire Can you List and date the Losses of the Ottoman Empire between 1683 -1914? The correct answer is (B) False Islamic principals ( Quran and Hadith ) was used to During the four empires (Umayyad, Abbasid, Ottoman, Safavid) rule. the Caliph in each empire invoked a divine status. A.True B.False Notes of importance to be considered While Watching documentaries •The Reasons for decline •The Relation between Religion and the state. •The European Imperial Intervention •The Political economical and social reform The decline of the Ottoman Empire Egypt Reform in the 19th century ! Mohammed Ali Pasha Era (Ottoman Empire) ! Ottoman (Turkey) I Egypt I Qujar (Iran) I i>Clicker Questions Group Discussion In the nineteenth Century, Ottoman (Turkey) , Egypt, Qujar (Iran), were faced by dramatic change between the challenging slow decline, reform and European Imperial intervention.
    [Show full text]
  • Images of the Ottoman Empire: the Photograph Albums Presented by Sultan Abdulhamid Ii
    IMAGES OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE: THE PHOTOGRAPH ALBUMS PRESENTED BY SULTAN ABDULHAMID II MUHAMMAD ISA WALEY ONE of the treasures of the British Library's Turkish collections is the magnificent set of fifty-one ornately bound albums, containing in all over i,8oo photographs (albumen prints), which the Ottoman Sultan Abdlilhamid II presented to the British Museum in 1893 and were received in 1894. (An almost identical set was given to the United States Library of Congress in the same years.) The contents represent a carefully picked selection from the vast photographic collection amassed by the Sultan, whose complete archive of over 33,000 prints is preserved at the Istanbul University Library. The gift was designed to show the Sultan, sovereign of a still considerable territory with a great history, as a reforming and enlightened ruler. Abdlilhamid II was an extraordinary figure and can be seen from many different viewpoints. It is not always easy for the reader to believe that the comprehensive character assassination by Sir Edwin Pears,^ the slightly romantic, perhaps over-protective account by Joan Haslip,^ and the quasi-hagiography by the Turkish writer Necip Fazil Kisakurek^ all really concern the same man. In fact, there is abundant scope and material for further research on the Sultan and the events of his reign, which lasted from 1876 to 1909. His photographs will surely play a part in that process. The volumes of mounted photographs range in size from about 25 x 30 to 30 x 40 cm. They are beautifully bound in very dark green morocco adorned with the insignia of Sultan Abdtilhamid II inlaid in red, green and black edged with gold.
    [Show full text]