5Th & Huntington Specific Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

5Th & Huntington Specific Plan 5th & Huntington Specific Plan CITY OF MONROVIA May 21, 2013 5th & Huntington Specific Plan CITY OF MONROVIA May 21, 2013 Acknowledgements The following individuals contributed to the preparation of the 5th & Huntington Specific Plan. City Council Mary Ann Lutz, Mayor Tom Adams Alexander Blackburn Becky A. Shevlin Larry Spicer Planning Commission Scott Austin, Chair Carlos Parrague, Vice‐Chair Bill Beebe Anne McIntosh Glen Owens Erica Thomas City Staff Laurie K. Lile, City Manager Steve Sizemore, Director of Community Development Craig Jimenez, AICP, Planning Division Manager Barbara L. Lynch, Senior Planner Ron Bow, Director of Public Works Developer Lincoln Property Company Consultants MIG | Hogle‐Ireland, Inc., Planning & Development Consulting Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers Architects Orange Land Design Consultants, Inc. Sitescapes, Landscape Architecture and Planning Fifth Avenue Specific Plan Table of Contents 1. Introduction --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1.1 Role and Function of Specific Plans --------------------------- 1 1.2 Authority for Specific Plans --------------------------------------- 1 1.3 Required Specific Plan Content --------------------------------- 1 1.4 The Purpose of this Specific Plan ------------------------------ 2 1.5 Overview View of the 5th & Huntington Development --- 2 1.6 Contents of this Specific Plan ------------------------------------ 7 1.7 Location and Plan Boundary ------------------------------------- 7 1.8 Property Ownership ------------------------------------------------- 8 1.9 Baseline Conditions ------------------------------------------------- 8 1.10 Applicable Policies and Regulations ------------------------- 11 1.11 Environmental Compliance -------------------------------------- 14 2. Land Use Plan and Architectural Style -------------------------------- 17 2.1 Introduction ----------------------------------------------------------- 17 2.2 Development Scenario and Types ----------------------------- 17 2.3 Architectural Style -------------------------------------------------- 25 3. Circulation Plan --------------------------------------------------------------- 37 3.1 Introduction ----------------------------------------------------------- 37 3.2 Existing and Future Offsite Vehicular Circulation -------- 37 3.3 Onsite Vehicular and Non-Vehicular Access --------------- 37 4. Infrastructure Plan ----------------------------------------------------------- 45 4.1 Introduction ----------------------------------------------------------- 45 4.2 Water -------------------------------------------------------------------- 45 4.3 Sanitary Sewers ------------------------------------------------------ 45 4.4 Solid Waste ------------------------------------------------------------ 45 4.5 Storm Water Drainage --------------------------------------------- 46 4.6 Electricity -------------------------------------------------------------- 46 Contents of 4.7 Natural Gas ------------------------------------------------------------ 46 4.8 Telecommunications Services ---------------------------------- 51 Table 4.9 Police Protection ---------------------------------------------------- 51 i Fifth Avenue Specific Plan 4.10 Fire Protection & Paramedics ----------------------------------- 51 4.11 Public Transportation ---------------------------------------------- 51 4.12 Schools ----------------------------------------------------------------- 52 4.13 Library Services ------------------------------------------------------ 52 5. Development Standards and Landscape Guidelines ------------- 55 5.1 Introduction ----------------------------------------------------------- 55 5.2 References ------------------------------------------------------------- 55 5.3 Resolution of Issues ------------------------------------------------ 55 5.4 Permitted Uses ------------------------------------------------------- 55 5.5 Outdoor Temporary Uses, Activities, and Events --------56 5.6 Limitation on Conversion of Land Uses --------------------- 57 5.7 Standards -------------------------------------------------------------- 57 5.8 Defensible Space Guidelines ------------------------------------ 57 5.9 Parking Standards -------------------------------------------------- 57 5.10 Parking Space and Access Standards ----------------------- 58 5.11 Bicycle Parking Standards: -------------------------------------- 58 5.12 Lighting ----------------------------------------------------------------- 58 5.13 Mechanical Equipment -------------------------------------------- 59 5.14 Trash Enclosures ---------------------------------------------------- 59 5.15 Outdoor Storage ----------------------------------------------------- 60 5.16 Walls and Fences ---------------------------------------------------- 60 5.17 Noise and Vibration ------------------------------------------------- 60 5.18 Sign Standards ------------------------------------------------------- 61 5.19 Underground Utilities ---------------------------------------------- 61 5.20 Landscape Requirements ---------------------------------------- 61 6. Sustainability Practices ---------------------------------------------------- 69 7. Implementation Plan --------------------------------------------------------- 73 7.1 Phasing ----------------------------------------------------------------- 73 Contents 7.2 Financing and Fees ------------------------------------------------- 73 of 7.3 General Provisions -------------------------------------------------- 73 Table 7.4 Administration -------------------------------------------------------- 75 ii Fifth Avenue Specific Plan Appendix A: Traffic Study --------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Appendix B: Parking Study ------------------------------------------------------------- 1 Tables Table 2-1: Residential Unit Mix and Unit Size ----------------------------------- 18 Table 2-2: Parking Space Allocation and Location ---------------------------- 25 Table 5-1: Use Regulations ------------------------------------------------------------ 56 Table 5-2: Development Standards ------------------------------------------------- 57 Table 5-3: Parking Requirements --------------------------------------------------- 58 Table 6-1: Sustainable Practices Implemented or to Be Implemented -- 69 Contents of Table iii Fifth Avenue Specific Plan Figures Figure 1-1: Location Map ------------------------------------------------------------ 3 Figure 1-2: Overview of Plan ------------------------------------------------------- 5 Figure 1-3: Vicinity Map ------------------------------------------------------------- 8 Figure 1-4: Parcel Map --------------------------------------------------------------- 9 Figure 1-5: West Huntington Drive Corridor --------------------------------- 12 Figure 1-6: General Plan Land Use Designations -------------------------- 12 Figure 1-7: Planned Development Area 8 – West Huntington Drive/South Side -------------------------------------------------------------- 13 Figure 2-1: Land Use Plan --------------------------------------------------------- 19 Figure 2-2: Outdoor Living Room ----------------------------------------------- 21 Figure 2-3: Open Space Plan ----------------------------------------------------- 23 Figure 2-4: Wrapped Parking Garage ------------------------------------------ 27 Figure 2-5: Exterior Facade ------------------------------------------------------- 29 Figure 2-6: Elevations --------------------------------------------------------------- 31 Figure 2-7: Storefront Design ----------------------------------------------------- 33 Figure 3-1: Conceptual Circulation Plan -------------------------------------- 39 Figure 3-2: Fire Lanes --------------------------------------------------------------- 41 Figure 4-1: Infrastructure ---------------------------------------------------------- 47 Figure 4-2: Utilities ------------------------------------------------------------------- 49 Figure 5-1: Proposed Landscaping Plan -------------------------------------- 63 Contents of Table iv Section 1 Introduction 5 Fifth AvenueSection 1 Specific Plan 1 Chapter Introduction Fifth Avenue Specific Plan 1. Introduction 1.1 Role and Function of Specific Plans A specific plan is a tool for the systematic implementation of the Monrovia General Plan for a particular property or properties. The specific plan effectively establishes a link between implementing policies of the General Plan and an individual development proposal in a defined area. A specific plan may be as general as setting forth broad policy concepts or it may provide detail for every facet of a development: the type, location, and intensity of uses; the design and capacity of infrastructure; the resources used to finance public improvements; and design guidelines 1.2 Authority for Specific Plans The authority for preparing and adopting specific plans is established by the California Government Code, Title 8, Division 1, Chapter 3, Article 8, Sections 65450 through 65457. These provisions require that a specific plan be consistent with the adopted general plan of the jurisdiction within which it is located. In turn, all subsequent subdivision, development, public works projects, and zoning regulations for the defined area must be consistent with the adopted specific plan. As with a general plan, the authority for adoption of the specific plan is vested with the local legislative body—the Monrovia City Council—pursuant to Section 65453(a). However, unlike the general plan, which is required
Recommended publications
  • Gold Line Bridge the Art O F Desi Gn
    GOLD LINE BRIDGE the Art o F desi Gn Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority 406 E. Huntington Drive, Suite 202 Monrovia, CA 91016 (626) 471-9050 www.foothillextension.org A Metro Gold line Foothill extension ConstrUCtion AUthoritY PROJeCt The mother art is architecture. Without an architecture of our own we have no soul of our own civilization. Frank Lloyd Wright The Gold Line Bridge ProJeCt detAils “The bridge he Gold Line Bridge is a 584-foot bridge that spans the eastbound I-210 Freeway in Arcadia, California. The $18.6 million dual-track bridge is the evokes The greaT T first completed element of the 11.5-mile Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension infrasTrucTure light rail project from Pasadena to Azusa, providing a connection between the designs of The 1930s existing Sierra Madre Villa Station in Pasadena and the future Arcadia Station. Works Progress The Foothill Extension is overseen by the Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension adminisTraTion and Construction Authority, an independent transportation agency responsible for the project’s planning, design, and construction. signals a neW era of the Gold line BridGe: stAtistiCs The Construction Authority, with the involvement of award-winning public arTisT involvemenT artist Andrew Leicester, envisioned the Gold Line Bridge as a vivid expression l ength: (end-to-end): 584 feet in major Public of the community, past and present. This pioneering collaboration resulted in Width: 115 feet between centerlines of the two signature support columns iniTiaTives of our the creation of a sculptural bridge built for the same cost originally estimated for a more conventional structure of its size.
    [Show full text]
  • Claremont Traffic and Transportation Commission
    CLAREMONT TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA “We are a vibrant, livable, and inclusive community dedicated to quality services, safety, financial strength, sustainability, preservation, and progress with equal representation for our community.” City Council Chamber Thursday 225 Second Street July 22, 2021 Claremont, CA 91711 7:00 PM COMMISSIONERS JUSTINE GARCIA CHAIR JACK BLAIR GLORIA HERNANDEZ-LOOFBOURROW JOHN MARLER JULIE MEDERO BRIAN MCCABE SONJA STUMP Pursuant to the local emergency concerning the COVID-19 virus declared by the City Council of the City of Claremont on March 19, 2020, the Los Angeles County Department of Health’s “Safer at Home Order” issued March 19, 2020, and Executive Order N-29-20 issued by Governor Gavin Newsom on March 18, 2020, the following protocols will apply to public participation for the duration of the emergency: Members of the public will not be permitted to be physically present at meetings. To allow for public participation, the Traffic and Transportation Commission will conduct its meeting through Zoom Video Communications. To participate in the meeting from the comfort of your own home or office, download Zoom on any phone or computer device and copy and paste the following link into your web browser to access and participate in the live Commission meeting at 7:00 p.m.: https://zoom.us/j/97473747561 or to only listen from the phone dial (213)338-8477, Web ID: 974 7374 7561. Members of the public who wish to address the Traffic and Transportation Commission on any matter listed on the agenda or a subject matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission may utilize the following methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Service Plan
    Attachment A 1 Core Network Key spines in the network Highest investment in customer and operations infrastructure 53% of today’s bus riders use one of these top 25 corridors 2 81% of Metro’s bus riders use a Tier 1 or 2 Convenience corridor Network Completes the spontaneous-use network Focuses on network continuity High investment in customer and operations infrastructure 28% of today’s bus riders use one of the 19 Tier 2 corridors 3 Connectivity Network Completes the frequent network Moderate investment in customer and operations infrastructure 4 Community Network Focuses on community travel in areas with lower demand; also includes Expresses Minimal investment in customer and operations infrastructure 5 Full Network The full network complements Muni lines, Metro Rail, & Metrolink services 6 Attachment A NextGen Transit First Service Change Proposals by Line Existing Weekday Frequency Proposed Weekday Frequency Existing Saturday Frequency Proposed Saturday Frequency Existing Sunday Frequency Proposed Sunday Frequency Service Change ProposalLine AM PM Late AM PM Late AM PM Late AM PM Late AM PM Late AM PM Late Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl R2New Line 2: Merge Lines 2 and 302 on Sunset Bl with Line 200 (Alvarado/Hoover): 15 15 15 20 30 60 7.5 12 7.5 15 30 60 12 15 15 20 30 60 12 12 12 15 30 60 20 20 20 30 30 60 12 12 12 15 30 60 •E Ğǁ >ŝŶĞϮǁ ŽƵůĚĨŽůůŽǁ ĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ>ŝŶĞƐϮΘϯϬϮƌŽƵƚĞƐŽŶ^ƵŶƐĞƚůďĞƚǁ
    [Show full text]
  • Lines 487/489 (06/23/19) -- Metro Local and Express
    Monday through Friday Effective Jun 23 2019 487/489 Westbound (Approximate Times) EL MONTE ARCADIA PASADENA SAN MARINO TEMPLE CITY SAN GABRIEL LOS ANGELES 10 2 3 4 5 6 7 83 9 01 El Monte Station Santa Anita & Oak Live Villa Madre Sierra Gold Line Station San Gabriel & Huntington & Rosemead Huntington Del Mar & Marshall Cal State LA Station B Station Union (El Monte Busway & Alameda) B Wilshire & Figueroa B & Westlake Wilshire Route 487 — — 5:34A 5:43A — 6:07A 6:15A 6:23A 6:36A 6:43A 487 — — 5:47 5:56 — 6:20 6:28 6:37 6:50 6:58 489 — — — — 6:08A 6:27 6:35 6:44 6:57 7:05 487 5:24A 5:35A 6:07 6:17 — 6:41 6:49 6:58 7:11 7:19 489 — — — — 6:26 6:49 6:57 7:06 7:19 7:27 487 — — 6:25 6:35 — 6:59 7:07 7:16 7:29 7:37 489 — — — — 6:46 7:09 7:17 7:26 7:39 7:47 489 — — — — 6:56 7:19 7:28 7:37 7:50 7:58 487 6:00 6:13 6:49 7:00 — 7:28 7:37 7:47 8:00 8:08 489 — — — — 7:07 7:31 7:40 7:50 8:03 8:11 487 6:18 6:31 7:07 7:18 — 7:47 7:56 8:06 8:19 8:27 489 — — — — 7:23 7:51 8:00 8:10 8:23 8:31 487 6:35 6:48 7:26 7:38 — 8:07 8:16 8:26 8:39 8:47 489 — — — — 7:42 8:11 8:20 8:30 8:43 8:51 487 6:52 7:06 7:45 7:57 — 8:26 8:35 8:45 8:58 9:06 489 — — — — 8:02 8:31 8:40 8:50 9:03 9:11 487 7:30 7:46 8:26 8:38 — 9:05 9:14 9:23 9:36 9:44 487 8:16 8:32 9:12 9:24 — 9:50 9:58 10:06 10:19 10:27 487 9:02 9:17 9:56 10:08 — 10:35 10:42 10:49 11:02 11:10 487 9:48 10:03 10:41 10:53 — 11:20 11:27 11:34 11:47 11:54 487 10:33 10:48 11:26 11:38 — 12:05P 12:12P 12:19P 12:32P 12:39P 487 11:19 11:34 12:11P 12:23P — 12:50 12:57 1:04 1:17 1:24 487 11:59 12:15P 12:55 1:07 — 1:35 1:42 1:49
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Public Hearing Pamphlet
    Proposed Service Changes Metro will hold a series of six virtual on proposed major service changes to public hearings beginning Wednesday, Metro’s bus service. Approved changes August 19 through Thursday, August 27, will become effective December 2020 2020 to receive community input or later. How to Participate By Phone: Other Ways to Comment: Members of the public can call Comments sent via U.S Mail should be addressed to: 877.422.8614 Metro Service Planning & Development and enter the corresponding extension to listen Attn: NextGen Bus Plan Proposed to the proceedings or to submit comments by phone in their preferred language (from the time Service Changes each hearing starts until it concludes). Audio and 1 Gateway Plaza, 99-7-1 comment lines with live translations in Mandarin, Los Angeles, CA 90012-2932 Spanish, and Russian will be available as listed. Callers to the comment line will be able to listen Comments must be postmarked by midnight, to the proceedings while they wait for their turn Thursday, August 27, 2020. Only comments to submit comments via phone. Audio lines received via the comment links in the agendas are available to listen to the hearings without will be read during each hearing. being called on to provide live public comment Comments via e-mail should be addressed to: via phone. [email protected] Online: Attn: “NextGen Bus Plan Submit your comments online via the Public Proposed Service Changes” Hearing Agendas. Agendas will be posted at metro.net/about/board/agenda Facsimiles should be addressed as above and sent to: at least 72 hours in advance of each hearing.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2016 Pricing Bene>Ts Charging Costs $1 Per Hour with a $3 Cap Per Charge, Low Price – You Can Charge All Day for Just $3
    metro.net/ev Plug in and Go Metro. ev charging fact sheet Overview How it works As a leader in sustainability and clean technology Sign up for an account on metro.net/ev. initiatives, Metro is the first transit agency in 1 the nation to integrate electric vehicle (EV) charge stations at its Park & Ride lots. The Level 2 charge stations allow riders with Download the EV Connect Mobile app, available EVs to conveniently charge their cars while using 2 for iPhone and Android. the Metro system. Park your vehicle at a Metro 3 charge station marked with the parking symbol to the right. Use the app to scan the station’s QR code. Or, touch your key fob on the reader pad 4 to start charging. Key fobs can be purchased from my.evconnect.com. 5 Plug in and Go Metro! april 2016 Pricing Bene>ts Charging costs $1 per hour with a $3 cap per charge, Low Price – You can charge all day for just $3. and users will be billed through their account. Parking is free at all charge stations except at Union Station. Convenience – Your vehicle will be fully charged when you return from your travels. Reduced Greenhouse Gas Emissions – By Locations combining an EV trip with public transit, EV charge stations are located at each of the you’ll further help to reduce our region’s overall following Metro Rail station parking lots: greenhouse gas emissions. > Union Station Expansion to More Stations – In 2016, 801 N Vignes St, Los Angeles 90012 Metro plans to expand its EV charging program Eight charge stations: P2 level (area D and M) as regional demand increases.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Is Making More Service Changes
    metro.net Metro is making more service changes. New schedules start June 27, 2021. 183 93 Starting on Sunday, June 27, 2021, Metro will make service changes in order to bring you a better bus experience. We’re realigning routes to better match travel patterns and adding trips to implement Phase 2 of the NextGen Bus Plan. The following lines will have additional trip(s) Weekdays, Saturdays AND on Sundays: 2, 4, 14, 16, 18, 20, 28, 30, 33, 37, 40, 45, 51, 53, 60, 66, 70, 78, 79, 81, 90, 96, 106, 108, 125, 127, 128, 152, 155, 158, 161, 162, 164, 165, 166, 180, 182, 200, 204, 205, 207, 210, 212, 217, 218, 222, 224, 232, 233, 234, 236, 240, 244, 251, 256, 260, 266, 287, 294, 501, 603, 605, 617, 662, 665, 690, 720, 754, 761, 901 WEEKDAYS, the following lines will have additional trip(s): 62, 92, 94, 105, 110, 111, 117, 130, 154, 169, 202, 230, 242, 243, 265, 267, 268, 487, 489, 577, 704, 854, 910 SATURDAYS, the following lines have additional trips(s): 115, 230, 242, 243 SUNDAYS, the following lines have additional trips(s): 105 The following lines have no route changes, ONLY bus stop consolidation: 35, 38, 48, 55, 92, 164, 165, 460 We’re modifying service on these bus lines: 10 – Overnight owl service will be discontinued due to low ridership. Bus stop consolidation. 14 – Line 14 will continue to operate via existing route between Beverly/San Vicente and downtown via Beverly Bl. Line 617 will replace Line 14 west of Beverly Center with service via Burton Wy and Beverly Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles County Local Highways Final 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program
    Los Angeles County Local Highways Final 2019 Federal Transportation Improvement Program Los Angeles County Project Listing Local Highway (in $000`s) Signage Signage ProjectID County Air Basin Model RTP ID Program Route Begin End System Conformity Category Amendment Begin End LA0G230 Los Angeles SCAB 1AL04 NCRT3 L NON-REPORTABLE TCM 0 Description: PTC 20,000 Agency AGOURA HILLS U.S.101/PALO COMADO Interchange. Widen from 40' to ultimate width of 76'. One lane in each direction and one left-turn lane, Class II bike lanes (0.53 miles), sidewalks,and aesthetic enhancements. (widening is for left turn lanes only) Fund ENG R/W CON Total Prior 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021 2021/2022 2022/2023 2023/2024 Total MEASURE R 20H - HIGHWAY 4,000 7,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 CAPITAL MEASURE M 9,000 9,000 4,000 4,000 1,000 9,000 LA0G230 Total 4,000 16,000 20,000 11,000 4,000 4,000 1,000 20,000 Signage Signage ProjectID County Air Basin Model RTP ID Program Route Begin End System Conformity Category Amendment Begin End LAF7600 Los Angeles SCAB 1O1008 NCR10 L EXEMPT - 93.126 0 Description: PTC 1,028 Agency ALHAMBRA ALHAMBRA PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENT/WALKING VIABILITY PROJECT ON VALLEY: (1) Installs ADA curb ramps. (2) Installs bus stop improvements, including pedestrian benches, covered shelters, trash cans, wayfinding/signage, crosswalk enhancements, pedestrian hybrid beacons, pedestrian lighting, pedestrian countdown signals, and removing obstructions from walkways. Fund ENG R/W CON Total Prior 2018/2019 2019/2020 2020/2021 2021/2022 2022/2023 2023/2024 Total CITY FUNDS 363 363 33 330 363 LOCAL TRANS FUNDS 665 665 60 605 665 LAF7600 Total 1,028 1,028 93 935 1,028 Signage Signage ProjectID County Air Basin Model RTP ID Program Route Begin End System Conformity Category Amendment Begin End LAF3607 Los Angeles SCAB 1NL04 NCR25 L EXEMPT - 93.126 0 Description: PTC 2,379 Agency ARCADIA Arcadia Gold Line Station Pedestrian Linkage Project.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER P
    Canada Report Winter 2018 NEWSLETTER p. 5 Spring 2018 Vol. 15, Issue 2 Join Us at the Moving Forward Individual By Rail Regional Summit Highlights Next steps for expanding rail in the Upper Midwest By Richard Rudolph, Ph.D. rail advocates who are working at of Transportation Rail Office, Chair, Rail Users’ Network the state and local level to expand and Arun Rao, Passenger Rail Uncertainty Continues passenger rail and rail transit. Implementation Manager, on NJ Transit Rails p. 2 Our 16th annual conference is WisDOT. They will talk about taking place Friday, June 1, 2018 The day will begin with opening the proposed second daily from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. at remarks given by Richard Rudolph, frequency over the 418-mile Secrecy in Indiana Rail the Minneapolis Central Library, Chair of the Rail Users’ Network, route between St. Paul and to Trail Plan p. 3 300 Nicollet Mall in downtown and Brian Nelson, the President Chicago. Frank Loetterle, the Minneapolis. The conference, which of All Aboard Minnesota. Northern Lights Express Project Report from En Route to is sponsored by the Rail Users’ Alice Hausman, the DFL’s (the Manager who has also been New Mexico p. 5 Network and All Aboard Minnesota, Minnesota Democratic–Farmer– invited, will provide an update will examine what’s happening Labor Party) State Representative on the current efforts to expand in the Twin Cities and the Upper who serves on the House passenger rail to Duluth, MN. Brightline Launches Midwest regarding passenger rail Transportation Finance Committee, Intercity Service p.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Alternatives
    Readers’ Guidance: This chapter reflects modifications to the proposed project that occurred subsequent to issuance of the Draft EIR/EIS in April 2004. Changes are shown in strikeout and underline format so that the reader can compare updated information to that shown in the draft environmental document. THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Alternatives CHAPTER 2 - ALTERNATIVES Background Transportation improvements for the San Gabriel Valley and adjoining areas have been the subject of study for several decades. Among past efforts was the creation of I-210, the Foothill Freeway, for which planning was initiated in 1955. Implementation of that freeway plan continues today. As early as 1980, transportation planners envisioned the use of the former Atchison Topeka-Santa Fe Railroad’s Pasadena Subdivision alignment as part of a countywide rapid rail network. The first outgrowth of this vision was the initiation of planning for Phase I of the Gold Line in the late 1980’s. Local governments have been keenly interested in how that right-of-way might be best used to improve mobility. In light of the pending acquisition of the former Atchison Topeka-Santa Fe railroad right-of- way (completed in 1992 with Proposition C funds), the Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LACMTA), in cooperation with the Foothill Cities Transportation Task Force and the San Bernardino Associated Governments prepared a study that resulted in issuance of the Northern San Gabriel-San Bernardino Valley Transportation Corridor Preliminary Planning Study in 1992. In 1993, LACMTA and the Foothill Task Force Cities commissioned an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to evaluate the impacts of light rail and commuter rail east of the planned Sierra Madre Villa LRT station.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Service Councils All-Regions Public Hearing August 2020 + 25-30 % +15-20 %
    Regional Service Councils All-Regions Public Hearing August 2020 + 25-30 % +15-20 % Secure Future Funding Create a Transit First Full buildout of LA County consistent frequencies Reconnect by service tiers with our customers Invest in speed and reliability infrastructure Create all lines all day all > Create service tiers based week Reduce E operating resources R on projected demand Create safe & comfortable A waiting environments Schedule to current E W Connect the dots demand E R Establish facilities to E Coordinate with Muni optimize layovers Reduce duplication H W Simplify routes and Discontinue unproductive Reinvest resources to schedules segments improve lifeline services Reallocate duplicative & No reallocation of unproductive service resources 1 Minimized discontinued segments 84% of LA County residents have used transit at least once in the past year Creating a competitive transit network Fast/Frequent/Reliable service is key Building a network that reflects travel today & tomorrow Metro’s current system is not always competitive to get people where they want to go Improving midday, evening & weekend service The greatest opportunity to grow ridership is between midday & evening when many trips are short distance Providing better service in equity- focused areas Need to integrate Metro’s Equity Framework into the planning process 2 Transit First The full network complements Muni lines, Metro Rail, & Metrolink services 5-10 Min 83% of Metro’s bus riders 12-15 Min would have frequent service 20-30 Min all-day (compared with 48%
    [Show full text]
  • San Gabriel Valley Connections
    metro.net San Gabriel Valley Connections N E W Y O R V V K A A D R A A T T I I V V V V MOUNT SIERRA MADRE BL L L N N RE BL A A A SIERRA MAD A A IN ST L B B B O O V V V A A R R V V B B E E A A A A N N E E A V V I I R A A T T A A L L D N T AN R L S S C V Y V V A A B L O L L A E N R E A E E T A A T T E GROVE BL I I N S L L R L G E D E M R I I ORAN H H A A R A I A A L N C B C C C C H H I L S D LL A A I SIERRA A L H A R W G N T I I R VILLA ST V D V N L E I A N A A I E T Lake Station MADRE AL S H S S S R D MAPLE ST D B C N I A A AD E M R T M G S A CORSON ST L R Allen A FOOTHILL BL R R H D E FOOTHILL BL I V Station o OOTHIL S S A F L A BL 210 R M E O COLORADO ST L W V PASADENA C LEMON AV V S O O A SIERRA MADRE AV A D SIERRA MA R E A L L V COLORADO BL L COLORADO BL Arcadia COLORADO BL A V H L V O L A A L T B Sierra Madre Villa RA F o Y E Station V I 5 A A B E A A V V D R C o C R Station V L MONROVIA E V M A A V V O B R T A V V N N D E A D A A I ROYAL OAKS DR V ROYAL OAKS DR A S D P D A A A A A S A V I A T N E R L A G Santa Anita Park V V M V V A A I V N R N R R A V A RA S M R R L S B LA County CHESTNUT AV A A LARA ST A A DEL MAR BL DEL MAR BL C A T A A A N N R R W A N E E U V V B I I I A K A V A E T S R D R A A Z A T T A N Arboretum & A E N A A I L L D C N A I I G R D N DUARTE L G G S S B B S A S D E V A A L O V L L N R Botanic Garden A RR D A E E E A N L O T T HUNTINGTON DR N SA APU/Citrus College T A L L O R A E O A N E NGTO I TI D A HUN L B HUNTINGTON DR R I I L H H A A I A R V L F N N L T N M D I M S M H A C C C C S I R o A M Station H Azusa
    [Show full text]