DOCSLIB.ORG

Thomas Mitchell: Rebuilding Labor

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Thomas Mitchell: Rebuilding Labor Thomas Mitchell: Rebuilding Labor In a previous article, I wrote about lessons from the Northern Ireland peace process for the Middle East. I wrote that Israel’s parliamentary peace camp will need rebuilding in order to implement those lessons and make peace with the Palestinians. Since the formation of the second Rabin government in June 1992, Israel’s parliamentary peace camp—Labor and Meretz—has lost half of its representation. The rebuilding of Labor—or a new center-left party—is more critical than the fate of Meretz, because the latter is the junior partner. Meretz is the missionary party that has already succeeded in selling the concept of the two-state solution to Labor. But unless Labor rebuilds to the point that it can head a coalition government without Likud or other right-wing elements, there will not be peace in the Middle East. Labor is a middle-aged party suffering from several problems. First, it is overly dependent on former generals to fill the upper slots on its Knesset list. This has been the situation since Labor was formed in 1968 and the problem has only gotten worse over time. Second, it allowed itself to become too dependent on a few key leaders and did not replace them as they retired and left the party. Third, it has served in too many national-unity governments and so has not sufficiently differentiated itself from the center-right parties, Kadima and Likud. Fourth, it is suffering from the fallout of both a failed peace process and a failed war. A major characteristic of Labor is its dependence on former generals. There are two key dates in the militarization of the Labor movement, June 1967 and June 1974. Before June 1967 Israel’s prime ministers, namely David Ben-Gurion and Levi Eshkol, served as their own defense ministers. Ben-Gurion also served temporarily as a defense minister under Moshe Sharret after another civilian defense minister, Pinhas Lavon, was forced to resign due to a scandal. This was during Ben-Gurion’s temporary retirement from politics in1954 and 1955. On the eve of the Six Day War, Eshkol bowed to popular pressure and appointed former chief of staff General Moshe Dayan as his defense minister. Ever since then, only defense technocrats, one for each of the two main parties, and former generals have served as defense ministers with two minor exceptions. Menahem Begin served temporarily as his own defense minister in 1980-81, after ex-general Ezer Weizman. During his second term, he quickly made room for first Arik Sharon and then (defense industry engineer) Moshe Arens as defense ministers. The latest failed Labor head, Amir Peretz, was a civilian defense minister in 2006 and 2007; everyone has judged him a failure due to his and the IDF’s poor performance in the Second Lebanon War. In June 1974, after Golda Meir and Dayan were forced to resign, former chief of staff General Yitzhak Rabin replaced Meir as prime minister. Since then Shimon Peres has been Labor’s only “civilian” prime minister. Peres served three times as prime minister: after Rabin suddenly resigned in February 1977 for two months, after Rabin’s assassination in November 1995 for seven months, and from 1984 to 1986 after being elected in a close election with the Likud. Peres was forced to change positions with Foreign Minister Yitzhak Shamir halfway through his term by previous agreement. Since Rabin’s death, Peres has rotated with three former generals, Ehud Barak, Binyamin Ben- Eliezer and Amram Mitzna, as leader of the Labor Party. Labor has gone from a record high of 56 seats the year after its creation (1969), to between 35 and 45 seats from 1981 to 1996, to 26 seats under Barak in1999, to 21 seats in 2003 and 19 seats today. This is less than the 44 seats it held under Rabin in 1992. I believe that this shrinkage is due to three factors. First, the rise of smaller parties as the result of direct elections for prime minister from 1996 to 2001. Second, a backlash against the peace camp as a result of the failure of the Oslo Process. Third, the substitution of generals for a program and ideology has left the party without a real identity. The Labor Party has probably had two dozen or more generals on its lists in the last forty years. Since 1974, Labor has had only one civilian, Shimon Peres, elected as prime minister. From 1974 to 1996 two individuals monopolized the Labor Party leadership. One is now dead and the other left the party after losing the leadership to another civilian. Labor is in definite danger of echoing right-wing parties, permanently losing the Mizrahi and Russian populations and relying on an aging Sabra Ashkenazi population. Unless it attracts a significant number of new voters it will continue to see its share of the electorate shrink and its caucus in the Knesset as well. An over-reliance on former generals as leaders lead to a substitution of imagined military charisma for real popular policies and leadership. Israel is suffering from the same problem. There is precedent from Labor’s own history for a political penalty for a failed war. The Likud first came to power in 1977 in a delayed reaction to Israel being caught by surprise in the Yom Kippur War in October 1973. The next elections took place in December, too soon for Israelis to take stock of the responsibility for the failure and exact a price at the polls. A price will be exacted for Israel’s poor showing in the Second Lebanon War in the next election. The Likud will probably return to power in a coalition with Israel Beitenu and religious parties. Labor needs to go into opposition, develop new policies including a social agenda, and develop a close working relationship if not a Ma’arakh-style joint list with Meretz. Because of Israel’s PR franchise system a full merger might not be necessary and could even be counterproductive. But the two parties could found a joint think tank to develop a new peace initiative, new social policies, and new military policies. This will be difficult to implement as the two parties are competitors for some of the same electorate. But such a new relationship will probably take an outside stimulus to create. It will probably take balanced outside pressure on both Israel and the Palestinians through a dual mediation peace process to achieve this. I do not go into detailed demographic election marketing strategy. I’m an historian, not a professional campaign manager or pollster. Labor has plenty of these that it can hire in Israel or from America. But that is short term and tactical. Labor needs major strategic changes. So far its biggest innovation has been to have an “aluf” competing for the leadership whose title translates into admiral in English rather than general. In Israel’s situation it is natural that generals play a role in politics, they just should not dominate it and the party should not hold its electoral fortunes hostage to them. In this respect. Labor should be more like the Likud. Making Amir Peretz its leader was a step in the right direction. His mistake was to accept the defense ministry rather than the finance ministry or another economic post. Given more time, Peretz might well have become a skilled war leader, but Peretz could not count on that time in Israel’s strategic environment. Labor must also conduct a detailed demographic analysis of its electorate since December 1973. It should examine which sectors have left and why. It should then determine which demographic sectors are recoverable and build an integrated package of policies that will attract them. This combined with a principled peace strategy of peace with reliable Arab leaders will help it regain and sustain power. Labor has substituted tactical election policies at the expense of strategic thinking and its dramatic shrinkage has been the result. It is not too late to reverse this trend..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Amir Peretz Begins As Defense Minister by J. Zel Lurie
    Amir Peretz Begins as Defense Minister by J. Zel Lurie While this three-day symposium [at AJ Committee — with Yehoshua] was going on in Washington, Ehud Olmert was introducing his new government in Jerusalem. Most newsworthy are the two of the five new Labor ministers, Amir Peretz, minister of defense and Yuli Tamir, minister of education. Peretz confronts a large group of army officers and bureaucrats who have been coddling and cooperating with the settlers for decades They are accustomed to running the West Bank arbitrarily and no one dared question their decisions. Here is one small example of what Peretz is up against: A couple of Saturdays ago, the Jewish settlers in Maon, south of Hebron, wearing masks, attacked Israeli soldiers who were escorting 18 Arab kids to the regional school in at-Tawani. On the following Saturday, Peace Now received the army’s permission to send two busloads of peaceniks to a demonstration in at-Tawani. At Gush Etzion junction the buses were stopped. “Since we gave permission, the area has been declared a closed military zone,” the Peace Now demonstrators were told. “You cannot proceed.” Ran Cohen, a Meretz M.K., was on one of the buses. He called Peretz who must have raised the roof with his army subordinates. After an hour the buses were allowed to continue on their journey and hold their demonstration. Brigadier General Ilan Paz, who recently retired after 28 years in the army, seven of which were in the West Bank. commented: “For 18 months the settlers in Maon have been harassing kids passing their farm on their way to school.
    [Show full text]
  • JABOTINSKY on CANADA and the Unlted STATES*
    A CASE OFLIMITED VISION: JABOTINSKY ON CANADA AND THE UNlTED STATES* From its inception in 1897, and even earlier in its period of gestation, Zionism has been extremely popular in Canada. Adherence to the movement seemed all but universal among Canada's Jews by the World War I era. Even in the interwar period, as the flush of first achievement wore off and as the Canadian Jewish community became more acclimated, the movement in Canada functioned at a near-fever pitch. During the twenties and thirties funds were raised, acculturatedJews adhered toZionism with some settling in Palestine, and prominent gentile politicians publicly supported the movement. The contrast with the United States was striking. There, Zionism got a very slow start. At the outbreak of World War I only one American Jew in three hundred belonged to the Zionist movement; and, unlike Canada, a very strong undercurrent of anti-Zionism emerged in the Jewish community and among gentiles. The conversion to Zionism of Louis D. Brandeis-prominent lawyer and the first Jew to sit on the United States Supreme Court-the proclamation of the Balfour Declaration, and the conquest of Palestine by the British gave Zionism in the United States a significant boost during the war. Afterwards, however, American Zionism, like the country itself, returned to "normalcy." Membership in the movement plummeted; fundraising languished; potential settlers for Palestine were not to be found. One of the chief impediments to Zionism in America had to do with the nature of the relationship of American Jews to their country. Zionism was predicated on the proposition that Jews were doomed to .( 2 Michuel Brown be aliens in every country but their own.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Politics and Diplomacy
    Hoover Press : Zelnick/Israel hzeliu ch7 Mp_119 rev1 page 119 7. Politics and Diplomacy as israeli forces were clearing recalcitrant settlers from their Gaza homes on August 16, 2005, Khalil Shikaki, director of the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research (PSR) in Ra- mallah, published a column in the Jerusalem Post headlined, “How Sharon and Abbas Can Both Win.”1 Shikaki, a pollster and political analyst respected in Israel and the west, questioned the wisdom of Israeli unilateralism in Gaza and on the West Bank as opposed to Lebanon, where no one on the other side wanted to talk. Here, he argued, Hamas may be as close-minded as Hez- bollah, preferring to paint Israel’s withdrawal as a victory for Pal- estinian resistance, but Abu Mazen, supported by Palestinian pub- lic opinion, wanted to reduce tensions and negotiate. Make him look good by easing restrictions on Palestinian trade and move- ment, and he will help Sharon and Israel by defeating Hamas and talking about the terms for settling the conflict. In other words, let the PA rather than Hamas control the Palestinian narrative of withdrawal. Shakaki updated his survey data two months later for a con- ference at Brandeis University hosted by Shai Feldman, director of the Crown Center for Middle East Studies and former director of the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies in Tel Aviv. By that October conference, 84 percent of Palestinians were convinced that violence had played a role in the Israeli withdrawal. Irre- 1. Khalil Shikaki, “How Sharon and Abbas Can Both Win,” Jerusalem Post, August 16, 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • The Labor Party and the Peace Camp
    The Labor Party and the Peace Camp By Uzi Baram In contemporary Israeli public discourse, the preoccupation with ideology has died down markedly, to the point that even releasing a political platform as part of elections campaigns has become superfluous. Politicians from across the political spectrum are focused on distinguishing themselves from other contenders by labeling themselves and their rivals as right, left and center, while floating around in the air are slogans such as “political left,” social left,” “soft right,” “new right,” and “mainstream right.” Yet what do “left” and “right” mean in Israel, and to what extent do these slogans as well as the political division in today’s Israel correlate with the political traditions of the various parties? Is the Labor Party the obvious and natural heir of The Workers Party of the Land of Israel (Mapai)? Did the historical Mapai under the stewardship of Ben Gurion view itself as a left-wing party? Did Menachem Begin’s Herut Party see itself as a right-wing party? The Zionist Left and the Soviet Union As far-fetched as it may seem in the eyes of today’s onlooker, during the first years after the establishment of the state, the position vis-à-vis the Soviet Union was the litmus test of the left camp, which was then called “the workers’ camp.” This camp viewed the centrist liberal “General Zionists” party, which was identified with European liberal and middle-class beliefs in private property and capitalism, as its chief ideological rival (and with which the heads of major cities such as Tel Aviv and Ramat Gan were affiliated)­.
    [Show full text]
  • AMIR PERETZ Member of Parliament, State of Israel
    SESSION 3 • Saturday, October 16, 2010 page 1 AMIR PERETZ Member of Parliament, State of Israel First of all I would like to thank the IFRI organization for the conference that is taking place here in Morocco. Here with me, are two other members of the Israeli parlimant - Meir Sheetrit, former minister of justice and Ahmad Tibi who represents the Arab – Israeli citizens. I was born in Morocco and feel that a big part of my values as a person were acquired here. Even though I left as a young boy, the strengths that I received here have been a part of me all through the way. I want to send a message of peace to his Majesty the king of Morocco and wish him all the very best. For a big part of Israeli citizens his majesty and the Kingdom of Morocco, remains a lasting symbol and example of possible coexistence, rooted deep in our hearts. Ladies and gentlemen, I could have talked about many issues which occupy many countries around the world - Financial crisis, human rights and poverty. I could have talked about security threats, Iran and it’s race for obtaining unconventional weapons, sources of terror and their effect on personal security in each and every country. But today I want to focus in the chance for an optimist future in all the Middle East states, especially a better future between Israel and the Palestinians. Members of the conference, Some of us are experienced in war, and we all know that war comes at a heavy price for all sides.
    [Show full text]
  • The Saban Forum 2005
    The Saban Forum 2005 A U.S.–Israel Dialogue Dealing with 21st Century Challenges Jerusalem, Israel November 11–13, 2005 The Saban Forum 2005 A U.S.–Israel Dialogue Dealing with 21st Century Challenges Jerusalem, Israel November 11–13, 2005 Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies Tel Aviv University Speakers and Chairmen Shai Agassi Shimon Peres Stephen Breyer Itamar Rabinovich David Brooks Aviezer Ravitzky William J. Clinton Condoleezza Rice Hillary Rodham Clinton Haim Saban Avi Dicter Ariel Sharon Thomas L. Friedman Zvi Shtauber David Ignatius Strobe Talbott Moshe Katsav Yossi Vardi Tzipi Livni Margaret Warner Shaul Mofaz James Wolfensohn Letter from the Chairman . 5 List of Participants . 6 Executive Summary . 9 Program Schedule . 19 Proceedings . 23 Katsav Keynote Address . 37 Clinton Keynote Address . 43 Sharon Keynote Address . 73 Rice Keynote Address . 83 Participant Biographies . 89 About the Saban Center . 105 About the Jaffee Center . 106 The ongoing tumult in the Middle East makes continued dialogue between the allied democracies of the United States and Israel all the more necessary and relevant. A Letter from the Chairman In November 2005, we held the second annual Saban Forum in Jerusalem. We had inaugurated the Saban Forum in Washington DC in December 2004 to provide a structured, institutional- ized annual dialogue between the United States and Israel. Each time we have gathered the high- est-level political and policy leaders, opinion formers and intellectuals to define and debate the issues that confront two of the world’s most vibrant democracies: the United States and Israel. The timing of the 2005 Forum could not have been more propitious or tragic.
    [Show full text]
  • Exporting Zionism
    Exporting Zionism: Architectural Modernism in Israeli-African Technical Cooperation, 1958-1973 Ayala Levin Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2015 © 2015 Ayala Levin All rights reserved ABSTRACT Exporting Zionism: Architectural Modernism in Israeli-African Technical Cooperation, 1958-1973 Ayala Levin This dissertation explores Israeli architectural and construction aid in the 1960s – “the African decade” – when the majority of sub-Saharan African states gained independence from colonial rule. In the Cold War competition over development, Israel distinguished its aid by alleging a postcolonial status, similar geography, and a shared history of racial oppression to alleviate fears of neocolonial infiltration. I critically examine how Israel presented itself as a model for rapid development more applicable to African states than the West, and how the architects negotiated their professional practice in relation to the Israeli Foreign Ministry agendas, the African commissioners' expectations, and the international disciplinary discourse on modern architecture. I argue that while architectural modernism was promoted in the West as the International Style, Israeli architects translated it to the African context by imbuing it with nation-building qualities such as national cohesion, labor mobilization, skill acquisition and population dispersal. Based on their labor-Zionism settler-colonial experience,
    [Show full text]
  • Withdrawal from the Withdrawal Plan?
    One Hundred Days After the Elections: Withdrawal from the Withdrawal Plan? Lars Hänsel / Katharina von Münster Executive Summary Israel's one-sided withdrawal from Gaza in the summer of 2005 has brought the country a period of profound changes. The evacuation of Israeli settlements on the West Bank, the historic motherland of Eretz Israel, which was initiated by the Sharon administration, constituted for many a breach of a national and religious taboo for which, however, there were reasons. On the one hand, the failure of the Oslo process had destroyed the trust between Israelis and Palestinians; on the other, demographic forecasts had already prognosticated that the Jewish population would lose its numerical majority in the region between the Mediterranean and the Jordan. After Sharon's retirement from policy, the subject of withdrawal – Tochnit HaHitkansut – became the central campaign issue under his successor, Ehud Olmert. Mr Olmert's convergence plan not only envisaged a complete evacuation of the settlements scattered all over the West Bank, but also the integration of all settlements situated close to the border into blocks belonging to Israel. The withdrawal has also changed the country's party landscape for good. At the end of November 2005, Ariel Sharon announced his resignation from the Likud and the foundation of his own party called Kadima, resulting in the collapse of the Likud. When the 73-year-old retired from politics after an apoplexy in January, Mr Olmert, a former mayor of Jerusalem who was little known until that day, took over the business of government– an administrator who represented a political style which differed greatly from that of the general.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraqi Jews: a History of Mass Exodus by Abbas Shiblak, Saqi, 2005, 215 Pp
    Iraqi Jews: A History of Mass Exodus by Abbas Shiblak, Saqi, 2005, 215 pp. Rayyan Al-Shawaf The 2003 toppling of Saddam Hussein’s Baath regime and the occupation of Iraq by Allied Coalition Forces has served to generate a good deal of interest in Iraqi history. As a result, in 2005 Saqi reissued Abbas Shiblak’s 1986 study The Lure of Zion: The Case of the Iraqi Jews. The revised edition, which includes a preface by Iraq historian Peter Sluglett as well as minor additions and modifications by the author, is entitled The Iraqi Jews: A History of Mass Exodus. Shiblak’s book, which deals with the mass immigration of Iraqi Jews to Israel in 1950-51, is important both as one of the few academic studies of the subject as well as a reminder of a time when Jews were an integral part of Iraq and other Arab countries. The other significant study of this subject is Moshe Gat’s The Jewish Exodus from Iraq, 1948-1951, which was published in 1997. A shorter encapsulation of Gat’s argument can be found in his 2000 Israel Affairs article Between‘ Terror and Emigration: The Case of Iraqi Jewry.’ Because of the diametrically opposed conclusions arrived at by the authors, it is useful to compare and contrast their accounts. In fact, Gat explicitly refuted many of Shiblak’s assertions as early as 1987, in his Immigrants and Minorities review of Shiblak’s The Lure of Zion. It is unclear why Shiblak has very conspicuously chosen to ignore Gat’s criticisms and his pointing out of errors in the initial version of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Manchesterhive.Com at 09/26/2021 04:35:42AM Via Free Access DEF3 7/31/02 10:33 PM Page 42
    DEF3 7/31/02 10:33 PM Page 41 3 Between militarism and moderation in Israel: constructing security in historical perspective Jonathan B. Isacoff his chapter examines the concept of security through discursive contestation at the leadership level in a critical Middle Eastern case – that Tof Israel. The approach adopted here can be called historical constructivism in that it traces the fractured construction of security as a phenomenon that changes dramatically, and with significant political implications, over time. This historical constructivist approach is predicated on two fundamental claims. The first is that concepts such as ‘state’, ‘security’ and ‘nation’ are socially con- structed and thus will hold different meanings in different spatial and temporal contexts. The second is that the meaning of any socially constructed phenom- enon is perpetually contested. That is, one cannot allude to a single ‘objective’ understanding of security at any point in time. From these basic assumptions the chapter argues that it is both possible and necessary to distinguish between security – a state of protected existence – and the referent object of security – that which is to be protected.1 Related to this point is the contemporary Israeli notion of national or strategic security versus individual or ‘current’ security.2 All states and peoples want to be secure. In the case of Israel, however, the lines between these various and otherwise distinct concepts – security v. referent object; and state v. individual as referent object – have been constructed in an increasingly blurred fashion over time so as to advance the political agendas of specific political groups. In order to explain how and why this is the case, the chapter examines the specific discourses of secu- rity employed by opposing political groups during key periods in the history of the Arab–Israeli conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lavon Affair
    Israel Military Intelligence: The Lavon Affair jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/lavon.html Best choice for browsing Browse from Czech Republic Browse from France Browse from Sweden Browse from Canada (Summer 1954) Military Intelligence: Table of Contents | The Mossad | Targeted Assassinations The Lavon Affair is a spy story in Israel's early years that left a nasty mark on the young state, with reverberations for the following 20 years. It's name derived from Israeli Defense Minister Pinhas Lavon, though it is also referred to as " Esek HaBish" or "The Mishap". Revolving around nearly a dozen young Egyptian Jews who agreed to spy for Israel against their home country, the affair taps into a story of idealism and self-sacrifice as well as abandonment and an unwillingness to take responsibility. Due to strict censorship in Israel in the early 1950's, few knew that in the year 1954 Israeli underground cells that had been operating in Egypt were uncovered by the Egyptian police. A number of young Jews were arrested and forced to undergo a show trial. Two of them - Yosef Carmon and Max Binnet - committed suicide in prison due to the brutal interrogation methods of the Egyptian police. Two more - Dr. Moshe Marzouk of Cairo and Shmuel Azar of Alexandria - were sentenced to death and hanged in a Cairo prison. Israel glorified them as martyrs. Their memory was sanctified. Neighborhoods and gardens were named after them in Israel, as were dozens of children born in the year 1955. At the same time it was not publicly conceded that they died in the service of Israel.
    [Show full text]
  • No Public Enthusiasm in Israel Elections
    • " ........... _ . ,.".,.,,~, "1 . Thursday, July 20, 1961 Page Twelve THE JEWISH POST '.roggestions for setting up this type I A meeting of those interested will Wanted - Exchange MTC Grows Up of an organization. All enquiries be called within the next two weeks, Baby-sitter Manitoba Theatre Centre has regarding the proposal should be at which time a committee will be d Wanted - Baby-sitter for two taken its first step on the road to­ sent in writing to Tom Hendry, formed to study the I?robJ.;m, :m children in exchange for free holi­ Man ito b a Theatre Centre, 419 to make recommendations m Vlew ward becoming a professional thea­ By REUBEN SLONIM day (room and board) at Detroit tre with the adoption of a poliey Avenue building, 265 Portage ave- of the experience of the people Lakes. Phone JUstice 64624. guaranteeing its actors weekly fees nue, Winnipeg 2. concerned. I Associate Editor of The Telegram, " Board and Room Wanted rather than expense allowances, J. Toronto IWanted: Board and room for Ogden Turner, president of the Mr. Ben-Gurion explained his "ir­ Vol. XXXVII WINNIPEG, THUHSDAY, JULY 27, 1961 No, 30 A series written for ten newspapers girl university student in River Centre, said this week. 'But, he rev.ocable" stand which had led to Reject Stand his resignation and the subsequent in The Telegram News Service Heights district. Reply to Box 0, added, "it creates a concern within The Jewish Post, 1244 Main St., (Cant. from page 1) fall of the Government, That step, (Published by permission) MTC for the person not making FOR SALE Winnipeg 4, Man.
    [Show full text]