DOCSLIB.ORG

Kamloops Chinúk Wawa, Chinuk Pipa, and the Vitality of Pidgins

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kamloops Chinúk Wawa, Chinuk Pipa, and the Vitality of Pidgins Kamloops Chinúk Wawa, Chinuk pipa, and the vitality of pidgins by David Douglas Robertson B.A., Columbia University, 1988 A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of Linguistics © David Douglas Robertson, 2011 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This dissertation may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopying or other means, without the permission of the author. ii Kamloops Chinúk Wawa, Chinuk pipa, and the vitality of pidgins by David Douglas Robertson B.A., Columbia University, 1988 Supervisory Committee Dr. Ewa Czaykowska-Higgins, Supervisor (Department of Linguistics, University of Victoria) Dr. Sarah Grey Thomason, Departmental Member (Department of Linguistics, University of Victoria; University of Michigan) Dr. Wendy Wickwire, Outside Member (Department of History, University of Victoria) iii Supervisory Committee Dr. Ewa Czaykowska-Higgins, Supervisor (Department of Linguistics, University of Victoria) Dr. Sarah Grey Thomason, Departmental Member (Department of Linguistics, University of Victoria; University of Michigan) Dr. Wendy Wickwire, Outside Member (Department of History, University of Victoria) Abstract This dissertation presents the first full grammatical description of unprompted (spontaneous) speech in pidgin Chinook Jargon [synonyms Chinúk Wawa, Chinook]. The data come from a dialect I term ‘Kamloops Chinúk Wawa’, used in southern interior British Columbia circa 1900. I also present the first historical study and structural analysis of the shorthand-based ‘Chinuk pipa ’ alphabet in which Kamloops Chinúk Wawa was written, primarily by Salish people. This study is made possible by the discovery of several hundred such texts, which I have transliterated and analyzed. The Basic Linguistic Theory-inspired (cf. Dixon 2010a,b) framework used here interprets Kamloops Chinúk Wawa as surprisingly ramified in morphological and syntactic structure, a finding in line with recent studies reexamining the status of pidgins by Bakker (e.g. 2003a,b, forthcoming) among others. Among the major findings: an unusually successful pidgin literacy including a widely circulated newspaper Kamloops Wawa , and language planning by the missionary J.M.R. Le Jeune, O.M.I. He planned both for the use of Kamloops Chinúk Wawa and this alphabet, and for their pre-planned replacement by English. Additional sociolinguistic factors determining how Chinuk pipa was written included Salish preferences for learning to write by whole-word units (rather than letter by letter), and toward informal intra-community teaching of this first group literacy. In addition to compounding and conversion of lexical roots, Kamloops Chinúk Wawa morphology exploited three types of preposed grammatical morphemes—affixes, clitics, and particles. Virtually all are homonymous with and grammaticalized from demonstrably lexical morphs. Newly identified categories include ‘out-of-control’ transitivity marking and discourse markers including ‘admirative’ and ‘inferred’. Contrary to previous claims about Chinook Jargon (cf. Vrzi ć 1999), no overt passive voice exists in Kamloops Chinúk Wawa (nor probably in pan-Chinook Jargon), but a previously unknown ‘passivization strategy’ of implied agent demotion is brought to light. A realis-irrealis modality distinction is reflected at several scopal levels: phrase, clause and sentence. Functional differences are observed between irrealis clauses before and after main clauses. Polar questions are restricted to subordinate clauses, while alternative questions are formed by simple juxtaposition of irrealis clauses. Main-clause interrogatives are limited to content-question forms, optionally with irrealis marking. Positive imperatives are normally signaled by a mood particle on a realis clause, negative ones by a negative particle. Aspect is marked in a three-part ingressive-imperfective- completive system, with a marginal fourth ‘conative’. One negative operator has iv characteristically clausal, and another phrasal, scope. One copula is newly attested. Degree marking is largely confined to ‘predicative’ adjectives (copula complements). Several novel features of pronoun usage possibly reflect Salish L1 grammatical habits: a consistent animacy distinction occurs in third-person pronouns, where pan-Chinook Jargon iaka (animate singular) and klaska (animate plural) contrast with a null ( ∅ ) inanimate object/patient; this null and iaka are non-specified for number; in intransitives, double exponence (repetition) of pronominal subjects is common; and pan-Chinook Jargon klaksta (originally ‘who?’) and klaska (originally ‘they’) vary freely with each other. Certain etymologically content-question forms are used also as determiners. Kamloops Chinúk Wawa’s numeral system is unusually regular and small for a pidgin; numerals are also used ordinally in a distinctly Chinook Jargon type of personal name. There is a null allomorph of the preposition kopa . This preposition has additionally a realis complementizer function (with nominalized predicates) distinct from irrealis pus (with verbal ones). Conjunction pi also has a function in a syntactic focus-increasing and -reducing system. v Table of contents Abstract ……………………………………………………………… iii Table of contents ……………………………………………………… v List of tables ……………………………………………………………… xii List of figures ……………………………………………………………… xiv Acknowledgments ……………………………………………………… xv Abbreviations and conventions used in this study ……………………… xvii Chapter 1: Introduction ……………………………………………… 1 1.1 Acknowledging previous work: Chinúk Wawa ……………… 3 1.1.1 Birth: how CW came to be ……………………………… 4 1.1.2 Growth: pan-CW ……………………………………… 6 1.1.3 Elaboration: creolized CW ……………………………… 10 1.2 Building on previous work: an under-described CW variety and writing system ……………………………………………………… 11 1.2.1 Chinuk pipa shorthand ……………………………… 11 1.2.2 Kamloops Chinúk Wawa (KCW) ……………………… 13 1.2.3 How KCW and Chinuk pipa are unusual ……………… 18 1.3 Methodology …………………………………………………........ 19 Chapter 2: The Chinuk pipa script …………................................ 25 2.1 Introduction ……………………………………………………… 25 2.2 History ……………………………………………………… 25 2.3 Structural description ……………………………………………… 37 2.3.1 Rationality ……………………………………………… 39 2.3.2 Broad phoneticity ……………………………………… 41 2.3.3 Alphabeticity ……………………………………………… 43 2.3.4 Cursiveness ……………………………………………… 43 2.3.5 Direction of writing ……………………………………… 45 2.3.6 Subdivisions in Chinuk pipa text ……………………… 46 2.3.6.1 Syllabification ……………………………………… 47 2.3.6.2 Word spacing ……………………………………… 47 2.3.6.3 Larger units: punctuation ……………………… 47 2.3.6.4 Other symbols ……………………………................ 59 2.4 Epilogue: Adapting Chinuk pipa to latter-day technology ……… 50 Chapter 3: How extensive is KCW morphology? ……………… 52 3.1 Unproductive affixes ……………………………………………… 54 3.1.1 Externally-sourced affixal material ……………………… 55 3.1.1.1 Foreign morphological material subject to KCW syntax 55 3.1.1.2 KCW material subject to Salish syntax and morphology 60 3.1.1.3 Summary of externally-sourced unproductive forms 61 3.1.2 Unproductive forms native to KCW ……………………… 61 vi 3.1.2.1 Suffixoidal localisms ……………………………… 62 3.1.2.2 Possible suppletion ……………………………… 63 3.1.2.3 Summary of unproductive forms native to KCW 63 3.1.3 Summary of unproductive forms ……………… 64 3.2 Productive grammatical morphology ……………………………… 64 3.2.1 Word-formation: conversion and compounding ……… 64 3.2.1.1 Conversion (‘zero-derivation’) ……………… 65 3.2.1.1.1 Treating KCW conversion as morphological in nature ……………………… 65 3.2.1.1.2 Frequency and distribution ……… 67 3.2.1.1.3 Summary of conversion ……… 68 3.2.1.2 Compounding ……………………………………… 68 3.2.1.2.1 Identifying compounds in KCW 69 3.2.1.2.2 Characteristics of KCW compounds 71 3.2.1.2.3 Summary of compounding ……… 74 3.2.1.3 Summary of word-formation ……………………… 75 3.2.2 Other forms ……………………………………………… 75 3.2.2.1 Prefix: negative w͡ik- ……………………………… 77 3.2.2.2 Proclitics ……………………………………… 81 3.2.2.2.1 The range of proclitics ……… 83 3.2.2.2.1.1 Diminutive tanas= ……… 83 3.2.2.2.1.2 Causative mamuk= ……… 85 3.2.2.2.1.3 Aspectual proclitics ……… 88 3.2.2.2.1.3.1 Imperfective aj ͡u= 88 3.2.2.2.1.3.2 Ingressive tʃ͡ako= 91 3.2.2.2.1.3.3 Summary of aspectual proclitics ……… 93 3.2.2.2.1.4 Out-of-control (transitivity) tlap= 93 3.2.2.2.1.5 Subject/agent agreement: iaka= , klaska= ……………… 94 3.2.2.2.1.6 Summary of the range of proclitics 96 3.2.2.2.2 Summary of proclitics ……………… 96 3.2.2.3 Notes on ‘grammatical particles’ ……………… 96 3.2.2.3.1 Defining KCW grammatical particles 97 3.2.2.3.2 Functions of the grammatical particles 99 3.2.2.3.2.1 Transitivity (permissive): patlat ͡ʃ 100 3.2.2.3.2.2 Mood and modality particles 101 3.2.2.3.2.2.1 Irrealis pus ……… 101 3.2.2.3.2.2.2 Imperative tlus 103 3.2.2.3.2.2.3 (Negative) potential w͡ik-kata 104 3.2.2.3.2.2.4 Summary of mood and modality particles 105 3.2.2.3.2.3 Aspect particles ……… 105 3.2.2.3.2.3.1 Completive kopit 105 3.2.2.3.2.3.2 Conative trai ……… 107 vii 3.2.2.3.2.3.3 Summary of aspect particles 108 3.2.2.3.2.4 Polarity (negative) particles 108 3.2.2.3.2.4.1 ilo ……………… 108 3.2.2.3.2.4.2 w͡ik ……………… 119 3.2.2.3.2.4.3 Summary of polarity particles 110 3.2.2.3.2.5 Summary of grammatical-particle functions ……………… 110 3.2.2.3.3 Summary of grammatical particles 110 3.2.2.4 Summary of overt, productive grammatical forms 110 3.2.3 Summary of overt grammatical forms ……………… 110 3.3 Summary of morphology ……………………………………… 111 Chapter 4: Syntax 1: phrases and simple clauses ……………… 113 4.1 Predicates
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spirits of Our Whaling Ancestors
    Spirits of Our Whaling Ancestors SpiritS of our Whaling anceStorS Revitalizing Makah and Nuu-chah-nulth Traditions charlotte coté Foreword by MiCah MCCarty A Capell Family Book University of Washington Press Seattle & London UBC Press Vancouver & Toronto the CaPell faMily endoWed Book Fund supports the publication of books that deepen the understanding of social justice through historical, cultural, and environmental studies. Preference is given to books about the American West and to outstanding first books in order to foster scholarly careers. © 2010 by the University of Washington Press Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publica- Printed in the United States of America tion Data and Library and Archives Canada Design by Thomas Eykemans Cataloging in Publication can be found at the 15 14 13 12 11 10 5 4 3 2 1 end of the book. All rights reserved. No part of this publica- The paper used in this publication is acid-free tion may be reproduced or transmitted in and 90 percent recycled from at least 50 per- any form or by any means, electronic or cent post-consumer waste. It meets the mini- mechanical, including photocopy, record- mum requirements of American National ing, or any information storage or retrieval Standard for Information Sciences—Perma- system, without permission in writing from nence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, the publisher. ANSI Z39.48–1984.∞ Published in the United States of America by frontisPieCe: Whaler photograph by University of Washington Press Edward S. Curtis; Courtesy Royal British P.o. Box 50096, Seattle, Wa 98145 U.s.a. Columbia Museum, Victoria. www.washington.edu/uwpress Published in Canada by UBC Press University of British Columbia 2029 West Mall, Vancouver, B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheets French, Arabic, Simplified and Traditional Chinese, Somali, Spanish
    Translated COVID-19 Resources – September 24, 2020 Page 1 of 4 COVID-19 Resources Available in Multiple Languages Please note that not all resources will be appropriate for the local context. Government of Canada (all webpages available in French) Awareness resources are available in the following languages: Arabic, Bengali, Simplified or Traditional Chinese, Cree, Dene, Farsi, German, Greek, Gujarati, Hindi, Innu-Aimun, Inuinnaqtun, Inuktitut (Nunavik), Italian, Korean, Michif, Mikmaq, Ojibwe Eastern and Western, Oji-Cree, Polish, Portuguese, Punjabi, Romanian, Russian, Somali, Spanish, Tagalog, Tamil, Ukrainian, Urdu, Vietnamese Relevant Resources (selected) Languages About COVID-19 All Reduce the spread of COVID-19: Wash All your hands infographic How to care for a child with COVID-19 at All home: Advice for caregivers Physical distancing: How to slow the All except Bengali, Romanian or spread of COVID-19 Vietnamese COVID-19: How to safely use a non- All except Bengali, Traditional Chinese, medical mask or face covering (poster) Greek, Gujarati, Polish, Romanian, Urdu or Vietnamese How to quarantine (self-isolate) at home All except Bengali, Traditional Chinese, when you may have been exposed and Greek, Gujarati, Polish, Romanian, Urdu have no symptoms or Vietnamese Government of Ontario (all webpages available in French) Relevant Resources Languages COVID-19: Reopening schools and child French, Simplified and Traditional care Chinese, Farsi, Greek, Gujarati, Hindi, Italian, Korean, Polish Punjabi, Spanish, Tamil, Ukrainian, Urdu 519-822-2715
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Languages
    INDIGENOUS LANGUAGES PRE-TEACH/PRE-ACTIVITY Have students look at the Indigenous languages and/or language groups that are displayed on the map. Discuss where this data came from (the 2016 census) and what biases or problems this data may have, such as the fear of self-identifying based on historical reasons or current gaps in data. Take some time to look at how censuses are performed, who participates in them, and what they can learn from the data that is and is not collected. Refer to the online and poster map of Indigenous Languages in Canada featured in the 2017 November/December issue of Canadian Geographic, and explore how students feel about the number of speakers each language has and what the current data means for the people who speak each language. Additionally, look at the language families listed and the names of each language used by the federal government in collecting this data. Discuss with students why these may not be the correct names and how they can help in the reconciliation process by using the correct language names. LEARNING OUTCOMES: • Students will learn about the number and • Students will learn about the importance of diversity of languages and language groups language and the ties it has to culture. spoken by Indigenous Peoples in Canada. • Students will become engaged in learning a • Students will learn that Indigenous Peoples local Indigenous language. in Canada speak many languages and that some languages are endangered. INDIGENOUS LANGUAGES Foundational knowledge and perspectives FIRST NATIONS “One of the first acts of colonization and settlement “Our languages are central to our ceremonies, our rela- is to name the newly ‘discovered’ land in the lan- tionships to our lands, the animals, to each other, our guage of the colonizers or the ‘discoverers.’ This is understandings, of our worlds, including the natural done despite the fact that there are already names world, our stories and our laws.” for these places that were given by the original in- habitants.
    [Show full text]
  • An Early St'at'imcets-Chinook Jargon Bilingual' Text 1 Introduction 1 2 About the Newspaper
    "Fox and Cayooty": an early St'at'imcets-Chinook Jargon bilingual' text Henry Davis and David Robertson University of British Columbia and CHINOOK List This paper contains a transliteration (from the original Duployan shorthand) and . translation of an early bilingual St'at'imcets-Chinook Jargon text, with accompanying historical, orthographical and grammatical notes. The story was first published in 1892 in the Kamloops Wawa newspaper by the oblate priest J-M.R. Le Jeune; it thus counts as one of the earliest texts in either language. 1 Introduction 1 It is well known to the student of Salishan languages and cultures that before the time of Franz Boas, extremely few coherent texts, as opposed to relatively numerous fragmentary word-lists, of northwest Native American languages were collected and published. The nascent modern disciplines of anthropology and linguistics demanded such documentation. However, another force besides science played a considerable role in the earliest recordings of indigenous languages of this region: The activities of Christian missionaries, which led to work allowing in some cases (viz. Joseph Giorda, S1's 1871 dictionary of Kalispel) an excellent view of historical stages in the lives of these languages otherwise lost to us.2 An example of the same phenomenon is available to us also in the Kamloops Wawa newspaper published by Oblate father J.-M.R. Le Jeune from 1891 to about 19043, primarily in the Chinook Jargon, of which it is an extensive and often overlooked document. In volume 2, Issue 47 of Kamloops Wawa, dated October 16 [sic], 18924, we find under the English heading "Recreative" the following: Kopa Pavilion ilihi nsaika tlap ukuk hloima syisim kopa Lilwat wawa[:] Fox and Cayooty.~.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of the Least Documented Language Families in the World
    Vol. 4 (2010), pp. 177-212 http://nflrc.hawaii.edu/ldc/ http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4478 The status of the least documented language families in the world Harald Hammarström Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen and Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig This paper aims to list all known language families that are not yet extinct and all of whose member languages are very poorly documented, i.e., less than a sketch grammar’s worth of data has been collected. It explains what constitutes a valid family, what amount and kinds of documentary data are sufficient, when a language is considered extinct, and more. It is hoped that the survey will be useful in setting priorities for documenta- tion fieldwork, in particular for those documentation efforts whose underlying goal is to understand linguistic diversity. 1. InTroducTIon. There are several legitimate reasons for pursuing language documen- tation (cf. Krauss 2007 for a fuller discussion).1 Perhaps the most important reason is for the benefit of the speaker community itself (see Voort 2007 for some clear examples). Another reason is that it contributes to linguistic theory: if we understand the limits and distribution of diversity of the world’s languages, we can formulate and provide evidence for statements about the nature of language (Brenzinger 2007; Hyman 2003; Evans 2009; Harrison 2007). From the latter perspective, it is especially interesting to document lan- guages that are the most divergent from ones that are well-documented—in other words, those that belong to unrelated families. I have conducted a survey of the documentation of the language families of the world, and in this paper, I will list the least-documented ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Languages of Flores
    Are the Central Flores languages really typologically unusual? Alexander Elias January 13, 2020 1 Abstract The isolating languages of Central Flores (Austronesian) are typologically distinct from their nearby relatives. They have no bound morphology, as well elaborate numeral clas- sifier systems, and quinary-decimal numeral system. McWhorter (2019) proposes that their isolating typology is due to imperfect adult language acquisition of a language of Sulawesi, brought to Flores by settlers from Sulawesi in the relatively recent past. I pro- pose an alternative interpretation, which better accounts for the other typological features found in Central Flores: the Central Flores languages are isolating because they have a strong substrate influence from a now-extinct isolating language belonging to the Mekong- Mamberamo linguistic area (Gil 2015). This explanation better accounts for the typological profile of Central Flores and is a more plausible contact scenario. Keywords: Central Flores languages, Eastern Indonesia, isolating languages, Mekong- Mamberamo linguistic area, substrate influence 2 Introduction The Central Flores languages (Austronesian; Central Malayo-Polynesian) are a group of serialising SVO languages with obligatory numeral classifier systems spoken on the island of Flores, one of the Lesser Sunda Islands in the east of Indonesia. These languages, which are almost completely lacking in bound morphology, include Lio, Ende, Nage, Keo, Ngadha and Rongga. Taken in their local context, this typological profile is unusual: other Austronesian languages of eastern Indonesia generally have some bound morphology and non-obligatory numeral classifier systems. However, in a broader view, the Central Flores languages are typologically similar to many of the isolating languages of Mainland Southeast Asia and Western New Guinea, many of which are also isolating, serialising SVO languages with obligatory numeral classifier systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Lillooet Between Sechelt and Shuswap Jan P. Van Eijk First
    Lillooet between Sechelt and Shuswap Jan P. van Eijk First Nations University of Canada Although most details of the grammatical and lexical structure of Lillooet put this language firmly within the Interior branch of the Salish language family, Lillooet also shares some features with the Coast or Central branch. In this paper we describe some of the similarities between Lillooet and one of its closest Interior relatives, viz., Shuswap, and we also note some similarities be­ tween Lillooet and Sechelt, one of Lillooet' s western neighbours but belonging to the Coast branch. Particular attention is paid to some obvious loans between Lillooet and Sechelt. 1 Introduction Lillooet belongs with Shuswap to the Interior branch of the Salish language family, while Sechelt belongs to the Coast or Central branch. In what follows we describe the similarities and differences between Lillooet and both Shuswap and Sechelt, under the following headings: Phonology (section 2), Morphology (3), Lexicon (4), and Lillooet-Sechelt borrowings (5). Conclusions are given in 6. I omit a comparison between the syntactic patterns of these three languages, since my information on Sechelt syntax is limited to a brief text (Timmers 1974), and Beaumont 1985 is currently unavailable to me. Although borrowings between Lillooet and Shuswap have obviously taken place, many of these will be impossible to trace due to the close over-all resemblance between these two languages. Shuswap data are mainly drawn from the western dialects, as described in Kuipers 1974 and 1975. (For a description of the eastern dialects I refer to Kuipers 1989.) Lillooet data are from Van Eijk 1997, while Sechelt data are from Timmers 1973, 1974, 1977.
    [Show full text]
  • Linguistics 181: SENĆOŦEN Fall 2010 Leonard and Werle 3 Handout 2
    Linguistics 181: SENĆOŦEN Fall 2010 Leonard and Werle Handout 2: Language families of British Columbia Terminology ‣ language : a natural system of human communication that includes sounds, words, and rules for combining these to express a variety of meanings. ‣ native language , first language : a language that one speaks from a very young age. ‣ indigenous , aboriginal : these terms refer to people or languages that live in or are associated with a particular place, are the first or among the first to be associated with that place, and have historical and cultural roots from that place. ‣ dialect : a regional or social variety of a language. Everyone speaks a dialect! ‣ idiolect : the speech variety of a particular person. One’s individual dialect. ‣ jargon : vocabulary associated with a particular activity (example: carvers’ jargon). ‣ pidgin : a simplified language used by speakers of different languages to communicate (example: Chinook Jargon). No one’s native language. ‣ creole : a pidgin that has developed into a full language (example: Hawaiian Creole). ‣ language family : a group of languages whose similarities indicate that they come from a common parent language. Such languages are said to be genetically related (whether or not the speakers of these languages are related by blood). ‣ language area ( Sprachbund ): a group of languages whose similarities result from geographical contact. Such languages may or may not be genetically related. Notes The aboriginal languages of British Columbia form about seven language families (see map). SENĆOŦEN, or Saanich, is a member of the Salish family. language family examples ‣ Algonquian Cree, Ojibway ‣ Haida X̱aad Kil, X̱aaydaa Kil ‣ Kutenai Ktunaxa ‣ Na-Dene Nicola, Tsilhqot’in, Dakelh, Łingít ‣ Salishan SENĆOŦEN, Halq’eméylem, Secwepemctsin, Nuxalk ‣ Tsimshianic S’m̓algya̱x, Nisg ̱a’a ‣ Wakashan Nuu-chah-nulth, Kwak wala,̓ Haisla Salish is one of the largest indigenous language families of North America, in terms of number of languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Jtc1/Sc2/Wg2 N3427 L2/08-132
    JTC1/SC2/WG2 N3427 L2/08-132 2008-04-08 Universal Multiple-Octet Coded Character Set International Organization for Standardization Organisation Internationale de Normalisation Международная организация по стандартизации Doc Type: Working Group Document Title: Proposal to encode 39 Unified Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics in the UCS Source: Michael Everson and Chris Harvey Status: Individual Contribution Action: For consideration by JTC1/SC2/WG2 and UTC Date: 2008-04-08 1. Summary. This document requests 39 additional characters to be added to the UCS and contains the proposal summary form. 1. Syllabics hyphen (U+1400). Many Aboriginal Canadian languages use the character U+1428 CANADIAN SYLLABICS FINAL SHORT HORIZONTAL STROKE, which looks like the Latin script hyphen. Algonquian languages like western dialects of Cree, Oji-Cree, western and northern dialects of Ojibway employ this character to represent /tʃ/, /c/, or /j/, as in Plains Cree ᐊᓄᐦᐨ /anohc/ ‘today’. In Athabaskan languages, like Chipewyan, the sound is /d/ or an alveolar onset, as in Sayisi Dene ᐨᕦᐣᐨᕤ /t’ąt’ú/ ‘how’. To avoid ambiguity between this character and a line-breaking hyphen, a SYLLABICS HYPHEN was developed which resembles an equals sign. Depending on the typeface, the width of the syllabics hyphen can range from a short ᐀ to a much longer ᐀. This hyphen is line-breaking punctuation, and should not be confused with the Blackfoot syllable internal-w final proposed for U+167F. See Figures 1 and 2. 2. DHW- additions for Woods Cree (U+1677..U+167D). ᙷᙸᙹᙺᙻᙼᙽ/ðwē/ /ðwi/ /ðwī/ /ðwo/ /ðwō/ /ðwa/ /ðwā/. The basic syllable structure in Cree is (C)(w)V(C)(C).
    [Show full text]
  • Halkomelem Denominal Verbs' 1 Denominal Verbs
    Halkomelem denominal verbs' Donna B. Gerdts and Thomas E. Hukari Simon Fraser University and University of Victoria Halkomelem has four denominal verb prefixes: c- 'have, get, make, do', I-'ingest, partake', txW- 'buy', i- 'go to'. These prefixes attach to nominal bases to form intransitive verbs. The noun to which the prefix attaches is usually unspecified, generic, or non-individuated and can be doubled with a free­ standing nominal of more specific meaning. Syntactically, this nominal is an oblique object, parallel to patients of antipassive or applicative constructions. Denominal verb constructions are widely used, especially for denoting possession. As in the case of denominal verbs in other languages, they can be formed­ quite freely, as long as the situation allows for an interpretation. 1 Denominal verbs Some intransitive verbs in Halkomelem are composed of a noun base, such as stiqiw 'horse', 8X wimel 'store', or sqew8 'potato', together with a verbalizing prefix.2 These forms appear in a denominal verb construction, where the derived form serves as an intransitive verb.3 I We would like to express our appreciation to the speakers of Island Halkomelem who have provide data for this paper, especially Arnold Guerin, Ruby Peter, and Theresa Thome. We appreciate editorial assistance from Kaoru Kiyosawa, Todd Peterson, and Charles Ulrich. Thanks to audiences at BLS, CLA, and WSCLA for comments on earlier versions of this paper. Funding for our research comes from a Jacobs Fund Grant and SSHRC Standard Research Grants #410-2001-1335 and #410-96-1247. 2 The nominal prefix s- disappears after c- and /- but not after tx w_ and i-.
    [Show full text]
  • Typotheque North American Syllabics Proposed Revisions to The
    Typotheque Prepared by Kevin King Typotheque [email protected] www.typotheque.com 04/06/21 North American Syllabics Proposed revisions to the representative characters of the Unified Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics code charts Typotheque Proposed representative character revisions of the Unified Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics 2 CONTENTS 1 Summary of proposed character revisions 3 2 Revisions for Carrier 9 3 Revisions for Sayisi 36 4 Revisions for Ojibway 46 Bibliography 52 Acknowledgements 54 Typotheque Proposed representative character revisions of the Unified Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics 3 1 Summary of proposed character revisions The following proposal requests 120 revisions to the representative char- acters in the official code charts of Unified Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics main and extended blocks. The proposed characters for revision have been summarized below with representative glyphs and corresponding character names with annotations where applicable. Additionally, revised code charts for UCAS main and extended has been provided in the following section with the proposed revised representative characters marked in pink, imple- mented into their corresponding code point locations. The author has prepared a style-matched font for the purpose of imple- menting into the code chart: 144B ᑋ CANADIAN SYLLABICS carrier H 160D ᘍ CANADIAN SYLLABICS carrier ma 14D1 ᓑ CANADIAN SYLLABICS carrier NG 160E ᘎ CANADIAN SYLLABICS carrier yu 1506 ᔆ CANADIAN SYLLABICS athapascan s 160F ᘏ CANADIAN SYLLABICS carrier yO 15C0 ᗀ CANADIAN SYLLABICS Sayisi
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructing Proto-Sahaptian Sounds
    Reconstructing Proto-Sahaptian Sounds Noel Rude Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation Sahaptin and the mutually unintelligible Nez Perce comprise the Sahaptian language family. This paper attempts to reconstruct the sound system of the parent language of that family. There is little dialect variation in the available data for Nez Perce, whereas Sahaptin divides into three definable dialect clusters: Columbia River (Umatilla, Tenino, Celilo, etc.); Northwest (Klickitat, Upper Cowlitz, Yakima, etc.); Northeast (Priest Rapids, Walla Walla, Palouse, etc.). Various features distinguish the dialects, e.g., long vowels derived from certain VCV sequences are more common in the Northern dialects and in Nez Perce, the Northeast dialects and Nez Perce are more likely to preserve the glottal stop, and the palatalization of *k is most extensive in the Columbia River dialects. The reconstructions proposed here are, as always, more or less tentative. Unless otherwise indicated the examples labeled Sahaptin (S) are from Umatilla.1 Figure 1. The Sahaptian language family Proto-Sahaptian Nez Perce Sahaptin Columbia River Northern Northwest Northeast 1 For the connection between Sahaptin and Nez Perce, see Aoki (1962), Rigsby (1965), Rigsby and Silverstein (1969), and Rude (1996, 2006). For the relationship with Plateau Penutian, see Aoki (1963), Rude (1987), and Pharis (2006). For a possible relationship within the broader Penutian macro-family, see DeLancey & Golla (1979) and Mithun (1999), also Rude (2000) for a possible connection with Uto-Aztecan. For Sahaptin grammars, see Jacobs (1931), Millstein (ca. 1990a), Rigsby and Rude (1996), Rude (2009), and for published NW Sahaptin texts, see Jacobs (1929, 1934, 1937). Beavert and Hargus (2010) provide a dictionary of Yakima Sahaptin, Millstein (ca.
    [Show full text]