DOCSLIB.ORG

Anti-Olmert Rally, Part 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Anti-Olmert Rally, Part 1 Anti-Olmert Rally, Part 1 In the May 1 visit to Meretz USA of Meretz MK Avshalom (Abu) Vilan, he told us of imploring Gen. Uzi Dayan (the organizer of this past weekend’s oust- Olmert rally) to press the goal of Olmert’s resignation but not of a new election, for two reasons: 1. Frequent elections are making Israel’s government unstable; the last election was little more than a year ago. 2. More importantly, Netanyahu would be returned to power at the head of about 35 Likud MKs. Abu feels that it would be far better that Peres or Livni replace Olmert with a new Kadima-led coalition and that with Meretz’s support, embark upon new avenues toward peace, via the Saudis, the US, Abbas and the European Union. He personally trusts Peres more than Livni, feeling that Livni’s not experienced enough and that her right-wing Likud roots make her suspect. But I find Peres ultimately untrustworthy because of his habit as a political intriguer. Hence, I think that Livni might be better, but either one as PM would be a source of new hope. Below is an abbreviated description of last week’s oust-Olmert rally from the MideastWeb for Coexistence site, by one Joseph M. Hochstein of Tel Aviv: What made this demonstration different from others was the crowd’s diversity. Members of opposing political factions shared the square. Young men wearing National Religious knitted skullcaps prayed in groups alongside secular Tel Aviv residents. … The closest the audience came to a display of vocal unanimity was when Eliad Shraga, a reserve paratroop officer who heads the Movement for Quality Government, exhorted them to act as judge and jury and answer whether Olmert was guilty. They found the Prime Minister guilty, of course, but the performance lacked spontaneity. … Cheerleading aside, the only words that seemed to evoke a genuinely spontaneous reaction were uttered by Meir Shalev, the novelist. He mentioned 40 years of occupation in a disparaging way, and some people in the northwest part of the square started booing. Later, the Council of Jewish Communities in Judea and Samaria (Yesha) commented that Shalev’s remark showed his hate of settlers. Someone I know refused to attend the demonstration. He said he did not want to help Benjamin Netanyahu become Prime Minister. His meaning became clear from the scene at Rabin Square. Dark-blue signs calling for Elections now were everywhere. They competed against the red-and-black logo that displayed the demonstration organizers’ motto, Bunglers, go home. Many members of the crowd wore dark-blue Elections now stickers on hats and shirts. Young demonstrators displaying Elections now signs took over the top of a Holocaust monument that dominates the southern part of the square. Elections now was clearly a message from the organized political Right. Despite the Elections now infiltration, people did seem to be making a real effort to keep the non-partisan spirit of the demonstration. Political parties refrained from displaying party signs, and few people in the crowd wore t-shirts with party slogans or symbols. No partisan politicians were invited to speak (unless you include Uzi Dayan, the demonstration organizer, whose Tafnit movement failed to win a Knesset seat in the last election). … – Joseph M. Hochstein, Tel Aviv [Cross-posted from Israel Like This, As If] http://israel-like-this-as-if.blogspot.com/2007/05/notes-from-may-3-rally-in- rabin-square.html Original text copyright by the author and MidEastWeb for Coexistence, RA. Posted at MidEastWeb Middle East Web Log.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Return of Private Foundation
    l efile GRAPHIC p rint - DO NOT PROCESS As Filed Data - DLN: 93491015004014 Return of Private Foundation OMB No 1545-0052 Form 990 -PF or Section 4947( a)(1) Nonexempt Charitable Trust Treated as a Private Foundation Department of the Treasury 2012 Note . The foundation may be able to use a copy of this return to satisfy state reporting requirements Internal Revenue Service • . For calendar year 2012 , or tax year beginning 06 - 01-2012 , and ending 05-31-2013 Name of foundation A Employer identification number CENTURY 21 ASSOCIATES FOUNDATION INC 22-2412138 O/o RAYMOND GINDI ieiepnone number (see instructions) Number and street (or P 0 box number if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite U 22 CORTLANDT STREET Suite City or town, state, and ZIP code C If exemption application is pending, check here F NEW YORK, NY 10007 G Check all that apply r'Initial return r'Initial return of a former public charity D 1. Foreign organizations, check here (- r-Final return r'Amended return 2. Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test, r Address change r'Name change check here and attach computation H Check type of organization FSection 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation r'Section 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust r'Other taxable private foundation J Accounting method F Cash F Accrual E If private foundation status was terminated I Fair market value of all assets at end und er section 507 ( b )( 1 )( A ), c hec k here F of y e a r (from Part 77, col. (c), Other (specify) _ F If the foundation is in a 60-month termination line 16)x$ 4,783,143
    [Show full text]
  • The Purpose of This Paper Is to Assess Various Unilateral Evacuation
    CONFIDENTIAL NOT FOR CIRCULATION MEMORANDUM TO: DR. SAEB ERAKAT FROM: NSU SETTLEMENTS FILE SUBJECT: PRE-PERMANENT STATUS SETTLEMENT EVACUATIONS (PART I): AN ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING PROPOSALS DATE: 30 APRIL 2006 The purpose of this paper is to assess various unilateral evacuation proposals put forth thus far, including Kadima’s “convergence” plan, and their implications for Palestinian interests. I. BACKGROUND Since the evacuation of some 8,500 Israeli settlers from Gaza and four small West Bank settlements as part of Sharon’s unilateral “disengagement” plan, there are growing indications that Israel may seek to carry out further settlement evacuations (as distinct from military withdrawals or redeployments) on a unilateral basis. While a negotiated settlement evacuation remains the preferred strategic option for Palestinians, the growing acceptability of Israeli unilateralism in Israel and abroad suggests that Palestinians may be forced to prepare for the possibility of further disengagement-type evacuations prior to (or instead of) permanent status negotiations, most likely in the context of a “state with provisional borders”. Many in Israel and elsewhere appear to view further unilateral settlement evacuations with increasing favor, particularly if Israeli and/or international confidence in the PA continues to wane. A recent poll shows that a slight majority of Israelis (51%) would favor further unilateral ‘disengagement-type’ evacuations by Israel in the event of the Palestinian leadership’s inability to negotiate or deliver a permanent status deal.1 Indeed, Israeli and international support for unilateralism may now be even higher following Hamas’s recent election victory. A number of unilateral evacuation proposals have already been put forward since the Gaza evacuation, by both the Israeli “left” and “center”.
    [Show full text]
  • International Human Rights Instruments
    UNITED NATIONS HRI International Distr. Human Rights GENERAL Instruments HRI/CORE/ISR/2008 21 November 2008 Original: ENGLISH CORE DOCUMENT FORMING PART OF THE REPORTS OF STATES PARTIES ISRAEL* [25 July 2008] * In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services. GE.08-45727 (E) 261208 HRI/CORE/ISR/2008 page 2 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page Part 1. General information about the State of Israel ....................................................... 6 Chapter I. DEMOGRAPHIC, ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS ....................................................................... 1 - 25 6 A. Geography ................................................................................... 1 - 3 6 B. Demographics ............................................................................. 4 - 9 6 C. Culture and religion .................................................................... 10 - 11 9 D. Indicators on the political system ............................................... 12 9 E. Languages ................................................................................... 13 - 15 11 F. Social economic indicators ......................................................... 16 - 20 12 G. Science and technology .............................................................. 21 16 H. Health care .................................................................................. 22 16
    [Show full text]
  • 990-PF Return of Private Foundation
    Return of Private Foundation OMB No 1545-0052 Form 990-PF or Section 4947(aX1) Trust Treated as Private Foundation Do not enter D. partment of the Treasury ► Social Security numbers on this form as it may be made public. Internal Revenue Service ► Information about Form 990-PF and its separate instructions is at wwwirc nnv/form For calendar year 2013 or tax year beginning , and ending Name of foundation A Employer identification number CHEHEBAR FAMILY FOUNDATION INC. 13-3178015 Number and street (or P 0 box number if mad Is not delivered to street address) Room/suite B Telephone number 1000 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE (718) 485-3000 City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code C If exemption application is pending , check here ► BROOKLYN, NY 11207-8417 G Check all that apply: L_J Initial return L_J Initial return of former public a charity D 1. Foreign organizations, check here ► Final return 0 Amended return 85% test, Q Address change Name change 2 chec, her end attach computati on H Check type of organization: Section 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation E If private foundation status was terminated 0 Section 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust L Other taxable private foundation under section 507(b)(1)(A), check here I Fair market value of all assets at end of year. J Accounting method: LXJ Cash L_J Accrual F If the foundation is in a 60-month termination (from Part ll, col. (c), line 16) 0 Other (specify) under section 507(b)(1)(B), check here 9 ,692,3 10 (Part 1, column (d) must be on cash basis.) Analysis of Revenue and Expenses Part I (a) Revenue and (b) Net investment (c) Adjusted net ( d) Disbursements (The total of amounts in columns (b), (c), and ( d) may not for charitable purposes necessarily equal the amounts in column (a)) expenses per books income income (cash basis only) I Contributions, gifts, grants, etc., received 3,605,889 .
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Olim Survey Findings Report
    MONAMONASH SH AUSTRALAUSTRALIAN IAN CENTRECENT FORRE FOR JEWISJEH WCIIVSIHLI CSAIVTILIIOSNA TION GEN17 AUSTRALIAN JEWISH COMMUNITY SURVEY AUSSIESJEWISH EDUCATION IN THE IN PROMISEDMELBOURNE LAND:ANDREW MARKUS , MIRIAM MUNZ AND TANYA MUNZ FINDINGS FROM THE AUSTRALIAN OLIM SURVEY (2018- 19) Building S,Bu Caildiunlgfi eS,ld Cacampulfieulsd campus 900 Dandenong900 Dandenong Road Road Caulfield CaEausltf iVIeldC Ea31s4t5 VI C 3145 www.monwww.ash.emodun/aarstsh/.aecdjuc / arts/acjc DAVID MITTELBERG AND ADINA BANKIER-KARP All rights reserved © David Mittelberg and Adina Bankier-Karp First published 2020 Australian Centre for Jewish Civilisation Faculty of Arts Monash University Victoria 3800 https://arts.monash.edu/acjc ISBN: 978-0-6486654-9-6 The photograph on the cover of this report was taken by David Bankier and has been used with his written permission. This work is copyright. Apart for any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of it may be reproduced without written permission from the publisher. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction rights should be directed to the publisher. CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................................. 1 AUTHORS ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019
    WID.world WORKING PAPER N° 2020/17 Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019 Yonatan Berman August 2020 Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949{2019 Yonatan Berman∗ y August 20, 2020 Abstract This paper draws on pre- and post-election surveys to address the long run evolution of vot- ing patterns in Israel from 1949 to 2019. The heterogeneous ethnic, cultural, educational, and religious backgrounds of Israelis created a range of political cleavages that evolved throughout its history and continue to shape its political climate and its society today. De- spite Israel's exceptional characteristics, we find similar patterns to those found for France, the UK and the US. Notably, we find that in the 1960s{1970s, the vote for left-wing parties was associated with lower social class voters. It has gradually become associated with high social class voters during the late 1970s and later. We also find a weak inter-relationship between inequality and political outcomes, suggesting that despite the social class cleavage, identity-based or \tribal" voting is still dominant in Israeli politics. Keywords: Political cleavages, Political economy, Income inequality, Israel ∗London Mathematical Laboratory, The Graduate Center and Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality, City University of New York, [email protected] yI wish to thank Itai Artzi, Dror Feitelson, Amory Gethin, Clara Mart´ınez-Toledano, and Thomas Piketty for helpful discussions and comments, and to Leah Ashuah and Raz Blanero from Tel Aviv-Yafo Municipality for historical data on parliamentary elections in Tel Aviv.
    [Show full text]
  • Return of Private Foundation
    Return of Private Foundation OMB No 1545-0052 Form 990- PF or Section 4947(ax1) Trust Treated as Private Foundation 10, Do not enter Social Security numbers on this form as it may be made public. Deparunent of the Treasury 2013 Internal Revenue Service Information about Form 990-PF and its sep arate instructions is at yvyvwj,' ov/form990 f. n to Publ ic I nspect ion For calendar year 2013 or tax year beginning , and ending Name of foundation A Employer identification number RALPH J. HARAR Y FOUNDATION, INC. 22-2457455 Number and street (or P O box number if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/surte B Telephone number C/O MORET GROUP 212-736-0041 City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code C If exemption application is pending, check here NEW YORK , NY 10018 G Check all that apply. Initial return 0 Initial return of a former public charity D 1. Foreign organizations, check here 0 Final return 0 Amended return 2. Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test, Address change Name chan g e check here and attach computation ► Check H type of organization : ® Section 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation E If private foundation status was terminated Section 4947(a )( 1 ) nonexempt charitable trust Other taxable private foundation under section 507(b)(1)(A), check here Fair I market value of all assets at end of year J Accounting method: ® Cash 0 Accrual F If the foundation is in a 60-month termination (from Part ll, col. (c), line 16) 0 Other ( specify) under section 507(b)(1)(B), check here $ 2 0 5 , 0 9 4 .
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 3
    COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES Original CSES file name: cses2_codebook_part3_appendices.txt (Version: Full Release - December 15, 2015) GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences Publication (pdf-version, December 2015) ============================================================================================= COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS (CSES) - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES APPENDIX I: PARTIES AND LEADERS APPENDIX II: PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS FULL RELEASE - DECEMBER 15, 2015 VERSION CSES Secretariat www.cses.org =========================================================================== HOW TO CITE THE STUDY: The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (www.cses.org). CSES MODULE 3 FULL RELEASE [dataset]. December 15, 2015 version. doi:10.7804/cses.module3.2015-12-15 These materials are based on work supported by the American National Science Foundation (www.nsf.gov) under grant numbers SES-0451598 , SES-0817701, and SES-1154687, the GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, the University of Michigan, in-kind support of participating election studies, the many organizations that sponsor planning meetings and conferences, and the many organizations that fund election studies by CSES collaborators. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in these materials are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organizations. =========================================================================== IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING FULL RELEASES: This dataset and all accompanying documentation is the "Full Release" of CSES Module 3 (2006-2011). Users of the Final Release may wish to monitor the errata for CSES Module 3 on the CSES website, to check for known errors which may impact their analyses. To view errata for CSES Module 3, go to the Data Center on the CSES website, navigate to the CSES Module 3 download page, and click on the Errata link in the gray box to the right of the page.
    [Show full text]
  • Soldiers in Legitimate Politics: the Israeli Case the Israeli Politics: Legitimate in Soldiers
    KAAN AKSOY KAAN SOLDIERS IN LEGITIMATE POLITICS: THE ISRAELI CASE A Master’s Thesis SOLDIERS IN LEGITIMATE POLITICS: THE ISRAELI CASE THE ISRAELI POLITICS: LEGITIMATE SOLDIERS IN by Kaan Aksoy Bilkent 2021 University Department of International Relations İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University July 2021 To my mother, Neşe SOLDIERS IN LEGITIMATE POLITICS: THE ISRAELI CASE The Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences of İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University By Kaan Aksoy In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS The Department of International Relations İhsan Doğramacı Bilkent University Ankara July 2021 I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts in Intemational Relations. (Asst. Prof. Tuaor A. Onea) Supervisor I certify thati hav~ adı1:J:ıis thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, ~ a thesı 1 tor ı.tı!ı'degree of Master of Arts in Intemational Relations. (Asst Jl>rof Rtfeml(dernir) Exannrımg lL omınittee Member I certify that I have read this thesis and have found that it is fully adequate, in scope and in quality, asa ti is for the degree of Master of Arts in Intemational Relations. (As rof. Berk Esen) Ex mining Committee Member Approval ofthe Graduate School of Economics and Social Sciences - (Prof. Df. Refet S. Gürkaynak) Director ABSTRACT SOLDIERS IN LEGITIMATE POLITICS: THE ISRAELI CASE Aksoy, Kaan M.A., Department of International Relations Supervisor: Asst. Prof. Tudor A.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Election Results in Israel, 1949-2019
    Chapter 19. "Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019" Yonatan Berman Appendix: Figures, tables and raw results Main figures and tables Figure 1 Legislative election results in Israel, 1949-2019 Figure 2 Class cleavages in Israel, 1969-2019 Figure 3 Vote for right and left in Tel Aviv, Israel, 1949-2019 Figure 4 Residual identity component in Tel Aviv, Israel, 1981-2015 Figure 5 Vote for right-wing and left-wing parties among unemployed and inactive voters in Israel, 2003-2015 Figure 6 The educational cleavage in Israel, 1969-2019 Figure 7 Vote for right-wing parties among Sepharadic voters in Israel, 1969-2019 Figure 8 The religious cleavage in Israel, 1969-2019 Figure 9 The gender cleavage in Israel, 1969-2019 Appendix figures and tables Figure A1 General election results in Israel by bloc, 1949-2019 Figure A2 Income inequality in Israel, 1979-2015 Figure A3 Vote for left by social class (excluding center and Arab parties), 1969-2019 Figure A4 Vote for the Republican and Democratic candidates in New York City, 1948-2016 Figure A5 The effect of the 2003 reforms on left and right vote Figure A6 Share of voters by ethnicity and religiosity, 1969-2019 Table A1 Division of parties to blocks Table A2 The effect of the 2003 reforms on right vote Figure 18.1 - Legislative election results in Israel, 1949-2019 100% Right (Likud, Israel Beitenu, etc.) Left (Labor, Meretz, etc.) 90% Center (Kahol Lavan, etc.) Arab parties (Joint Arab List, etc.) 80% Ultra-orthodox (Shas, Yahadut HaTora, etc.) 70% 60% 50% 40% Share of votes (%) votes of Share 30% 20% 10% 0% 1949 1954 1959 1964 1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019 Source: author's computations using official election results (see wpid.world).
    [Show full text]
  • EL AL Israel Airlines Ltd. Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2014-2015
    EL AL Israel Airlines Ltd. Corporate Social Responsibility Report 2014-2015 1 This document was composed by EL AL Israel Airlines Ltd. (“the Company”) solely for the purpose of presenting the subject of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in relation to its own operation as well as the operations of its subsidiaries. This is the third report to be published by the Company on CSR issues, and naturally does not exhaust the entirely of issues addressed by the Company. The report includes several issues that the Company chose to emphasize, but the inclusion of any specific detail in this report or the exclusion of others do not indicate whether such details are essential or inessential, and do not suffice as any kind of representation on behalf of the Company with regard to the entirety of its operations. It should be emphasized that the report is based on business data pertinent to Company operations, and this data cannot substitute any data published in financial reports by the Company and/or its subsidiaries. Accordingly, with regard to financial data or data concerning volume of operations, profitability, forecasting and so forth, only data detailed in financial reports are binding, and in any case of contradiction, data detailed in financial reports shall supersede. This document does not constitute a representation or explicit or implicit undertaking, and the accuracy, integrity or verity of the information or any opinions included herein are not to be based upon. Neither the Company nor any of its employees or representative will be held liable (whether due to negligence or any other reason) to any loss ensuing in any way from the use of this document or its content or any other manner concerning this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Shiron 1..242
    3 .........................................................................................................שירון Песенник ........................................................................................... 161 Songbook .............................................................................................. 235 שירים בעברית Песни на иврите Songs in Hebrew תוכן עניינים שירי שבת .................................... The Shabbat Songs .......................... 9 9 1. מה ידידות מנוחתך .................. Ma yedidut menuhatech ............. 9 9 .1 2. יה ריבון עלם ........................ Ya Ribbon Alam ..................... 12 12 .2 3. צמאה נפשי .......................... Tsama Nafshi ......................... 14 14 .3 4. ברוך אל עליון ....................... Baruch El Elyon ..................... 17 17 .4 5. כי אשמרה שבת .................... Ki eshmera Shabbat ................. 20 20 .5 6. דרור יקרא ........................... Deror ikra ............................. 22 22 .6 7. בני היכלא ............................ Bnei Eichala .......................... 23 23 .7 8. מזמור לדוד .......................... Mizmor le-David ...................... 24 24 .8 9. ידיד נפש ............................. Yedid nefesh ............................ 25 25 .9 10. אל המסתתר ....................... El hamistater .......................... 26 26 .10 11. למען אחי ורעי .................... Le maan achai ve re-ay ........... 28 28 .11 12. והאר עינינו בתורתך ............. Ve haer eineinu betoratecha ....... 28 28.12 13. כי חלצת נפשי ....................
    [Show full text]