DOCSLIB.ORG

Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 3 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES Original CSES file name: cses2_codebook_part3_appendices.txt (Version: Full Release - December 15, 2015) GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences Publication (pdf-version, December 2015) ============================================================================================= COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS (CSES) - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES APPENDIX I: PARTIES AND LEADERS APPENDIX II: PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS FULL RELEASE - DECEMBER 15, 2015 VERSION CSES Secretariat www.cses.org =========================================================================== HOW TO CITE THE STUDY: The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (www.cses.org). CSES MODULE 3 FULL RELEASE [dataset]. December 15, 2015 version. doi:10.7804/cses.module3.2015-12-15 These materials are based on work supported by the American National Science Foundation (www.nsf.gov) under grant numbers SES-0451598 , SES-0817701, and SES-1154687, the GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, the University of Michigan, in-kind support of participating election studies, the many organizations that sponsor planning meetings and conferences, and the many organizations that fund election studies by CSES collaborators. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in these materials are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organizations. =========================================================================== IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING FULL RELEASES: This dataset and all accompanying documentation is the "Full Release" of CSES Module 3 (2006-2011). Users of the Final Release may wish to monitor the errata for CSES Module 3 on the CSES website, to check for known errors which may impact their analyses. To view errata for CSES Module 3, go to the Data Center on the CSES website, navigate to the CSES Module 3 download page, and click on the Errata link in the gray box to the right of the page. =========================================================================== TABLE OF CONTENTS =========================================================================== ))) APPENDIX I: PARTIES AND LEADERS >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: AUSTRALIA (2007) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: AUSTRIA (2008) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: BELARUS (2008) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: BRAZIL (2006) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: BRAZIL (2010) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: CANADA (2008) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: CHILE (2009) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: CROATIA (2007) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: CZECH REPUBLIC (2006) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: CZECH REPUBLIC (2010) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: DENMARK (2007) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: ESTONIA (2011) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: FINLAND (2007) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: FINLAND (2011) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: FRANCE (2007) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: GERMANY (2005) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: GERMANY (2009) 1 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES Original CSES file name: cses2_codebook_part3_appendices.txt (Version: Full Release - December 15, 2015) GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences Publication (pdf-version, December 2015) ============================================================================================= >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: GREECE (2009) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: HONG KONG (2008) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: ICELAND (2007) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: ICELAND (2009) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: IRELAND (2007) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: ISRAEL (2006) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: JAPAN (2007) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: LATVIA (2010) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: MEXICO (2006) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: MEXICO (2009) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: NETHERLANDS (2006) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: NETHERLANDS (2010) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: NEW ZEALAND (2008) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: NORWAY (2005) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: NORWAY (2009) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: PERU (2011) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: PHILIPPINES (2010) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: POLAND (2005) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: POLAND (2007) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: PORTUGAL (2009) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: ROMANIA (2009) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: SLOVAKIA (2010) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: SLOVENIA (2008) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: SOUTH AFRICA (2009) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: SOUTH KOREA (2008) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: SPAIN (2008) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: SWEDEN (2006) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: SWITZERLAND (2007) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: TAIWAN (2008) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: THAILAND (2007) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: TURKEY (2011) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: URUGUAY (2009) >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: UNITED STATES (2008) ))) APPENDIX II: PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: AUSTRALIA (2007) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: AUSTRIA (2008) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: BELARUS (2008) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: BRAZIL (2006) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: BRAZIL (2010) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: CANADA (2008) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: CHILE (2009) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: CROATIA (2007) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: CZECH REPUBLIC (2006) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: CZECH REPUBLIC (2010) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: DENMARK (2007) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: ESTONIA (2011) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: FINLAND (2007) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: FINLAND (2011) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: FRANCE (2007) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: GERMANY (2005) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: GERMANY (2009) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: GREECE (2009) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: HONG KONG (2008) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: ICELAND (2007) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: ICELAND (2009) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: IRELAND (2007) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: ISRAEL (2006) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: JAPAN (2007) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: LATVIA (2010) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: MEXICO (2006) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: MEXICO (2009) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: NETHERLANDS (2006) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: NETHERLANDS (2010) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: NEW ZEALAND (2008) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: NORWAY (2005) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: NORWAY (2009) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: PERU (2011) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: PHILIPPINES (2010) 2 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES Original CSES file name: cses2_codebook_part3_appendices.txt (Version: Full Release - December 15, 2015) GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences Publication (pdf-version, December 2015) ============================================================================================= >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: POLAND (2005) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: POLAND (2007) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: PORTUGAL (2009) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: ROMANIA (2009) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: SLOVAKIA (2010) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: SLOVENIA (2008) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: SOUTH AFRICA (2009) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: SOUTH KOREA (2008) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: SPAIN (2008) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: SWEDEN (2006) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: SWITZERLAND (2007) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: TAIWAN (2008) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: THAILAND (2007) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: TURKEY (2011) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: URUGUAY (2009) >>> PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS: UNITED STATES (2008) =========================================================================== ))) APPENDIX I: PARTIES AND LEADERS =========================================================================== | NOTES: PARTIES AND LEADERS | | This appendix identifies parties active during a polity's | election and (where available) their leaders. | | The party labels are provided for the codes used in the | micro data variables. Parties A through F are the six | most popular parties, listed in descending order according | to their share of the popular vote in the "lowest" level | election held (i.e., wherever possible, the first segment | of the lower house). | | Leaders A through F are the corresponding party leaders or | presidential candidates referred to in the micro data items. | This appendix reports these names and party affiliations. | | Parties G, H, and I are supplemental parties and leaders | voluntarily provided by some election studies. However, | these are in no particular order. | | If parties are members of electoral blocs, the name of | the bloc is given in parentheses following the appropriate | party labels. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: AUSTRALIA (2007) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 01. PARTY B Liberal Party John Howard 0101 Peter Costello 02. PARTY A Australian Labor Party Kevin Rudd 0201 Julia Gillard 03. PARTY C National Party Mark Vaile 0301 04. PARTY D Greens Bob Brown 0401 05. Australian Democrats | ELECTION STUDY NOTES - AUSTRALIA (2007): PARTIES AND LEADERS | | C3010_E refers to Julia Gillard, member of the Australian Labor | Party (code 2) and Australian Prime minister since 2010. | | C3010_F refers to Peter Costello, the former Australian Minister | of Finance. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> PARTIES AND LEADERS: AUSTRIA (2008) 3 COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES Original CSES file name: cses2_codebook_part3_appendices.txt (Version: Full
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mandaterechner Wie Groß Wird Der Bundestag?
    #Mandaterechner Wie groß wird der Bundestag? Ausgabe 1 | 2021 Wie groß wird der Bundestag? Ergebnisse einer Projektionsrechnung Robert Vehrkamp WIE GROSS WIRD DER BUNDESTAG? – ERGEBNISSE EINER PROJEKTIONSRECHNUNG Impressum © Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh Juli 2021 Verantwortlich Dr. Robert Vehrkamp Christina Tillmann Inhaltliche Mitarbeit Lars Bischoff Matthias Moehl Autor Redaktionelle Unterstützung Gaëlle Beckmann Dr. Robert Vehrkamp Sandra Stratos ist Senior Advisor der Bertelsmann Stiftung im Programm „Zukunft der Demokratie“ und war Gast- Gestaltung wissenschaftler der Abteilung „Demokratie und Demo- Markus Diekmann, Bielefeld kratisierung“ am Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB). Im Juni 2021 wurde er als Sachverständiger in die Kommission des Deutschen Bundestages zur Reform des Bundeswahlrechts und zur Modernisierung der DOI 10.11586/2021065 Parlamentsarbeit berufen. [email protected] 2 WAS IST UND WAS KANN DER #MANDATERECHNER? Was ist und was kann der #Mandaterechner? Mit dem #Mandaterechner lassen sich Projek- Der #Mandaterechner erweitert damit bisher vor- tionsrechnungen zur Größe des Bundestages nach liegende Berechnungsmodelle um die Variable des der Bundestagswahl 2021 durchführen. Auf der Splittingverhaltens. Anstatt mit einer konkreten Grundlage des aktuellen Umfragetrends und in Annahme über das Splittingverhalten zu arbeiten Abhängigkeit von konkreten Annahmen über das und die Größe des Bundestages dann in Abhän- Splittingverhalten der Wähler:innen zwischen gigkeit vom Zweitstimmenergebnis zu berechnen,
    [Show full text]
  • Philippine Election ; PDF Copied from The
    Senatorial Candidates’ Matrices Philippine Election 2010 Name: Nereus “Neric” O. Acosta Jr. Political Party: Liberal Party Agenda Public Service Professional Record Four Pillar Platform: Environment Representative, 1st District of Bukidnon – 1998-2001, 2001-2004, Livelihood 2004-2007 Justice Provincial Board Member, Bukidnon – 1995-1998 Peace Project Director, Bukidnon Integrated Network of Home Industries, Inc. (BINHI) – 1995 seek more decentralization of power and resources to local Staff Researcher, Committee on International Economic Policy of communities and governments (with corresponding performance Representative Ramon Bagatsing – 1989 audits and accountability mechanisms) Academician, Political Scientist greater fiscal discipline in the management and utilization of resources (budget reform, bureaucratic streamlining for prioritization and improved efficiencies) more effective delivery of basic services by agencies of government. Website: www.nericacosta2010.com TRACK RECORD On Asset Reform and CARPER -supports the claims of the Sumilao farmers to their right to the land under the agrarian reform program -was Project Director of BINHI, a rural development NGO, specifically its project on Grameen Banking or microcredit and livelihood assistance programs for poor women in the Bukidnon countryside called the On Social Services and Safety Barangay Unified Livelihood Investments through Grameen Banking or BULIG Nets -to date, the BULIG project has grown to serve over 7,000 women in 150 barangays or villages in Bukidnon,
    [Show full text]
  • Senatorial Candidates 2016
    SENATORIAL CANDIDATES 2016 POST NAME PARTY NAME IN BALLOT Senator Albani, Ibrahim Independent Albani, Shariff (IND) Senator Ali, Alexander Alimmudin Partido ng Manggagawa at Ali, Aldin (WPPPMM) Magsasaka Senator Alunan, Rafael III Independent Alunan, Raffy (IND) Senator Ambolodto, Nariman Liberal Party Ambolodto, Ina (LP) Senator Aquino, Antonio Independent Aquino, Tonyboy (IND) Senator Arquiza, Godofredo Independent Arquiza, Godofredo (IND) Senator Baligod, Levito Independent Baligod, Levito (IND) Senator Belgica, Greco Antonious Independent Belgica, Greco (IND) Beda Senator Bello, Walden Independent Bello, Walden (IND) Senator Cam, Sandra Pwersa ng Masang Pilipino Cam, Sandra (PMP) Senator Catmon, Joel Philippine Green Republican Catmon, Joel (PGRP) Party Senator Chavez, Melchor Partido ng Manggagawa at Chavez, Mel (WPPPMM) Magsasaka Senator Colmenares, Neri Makabayan Colmenares, Neri (MKBYN) Senator De Lima, Leila Norma Liberal Party De Lima, Leila (LP) Eulalia Josefa Senator Domagoso, Francisco Pwersa ng Masang Pilipino Domagoso, Isko Moreno (PMP) Senator Dorona, Ray Independent Dorona, Ray (IND) Senator Drilon, Franklin Liberal Party Drilon, Frank (LP) Senator Gadon, Lorenzo Kilusang Bagong Lipunan Gadon, Larry (KBL) Senator Gatchalian, Sherwin Nationalist People's Coalition Gatchalian, Win (NPC) Senator Gordon, Richard Independent Gordon, Dick (IND) Senator Guingona, Teofisto III Liberal Party Guingona, TG (LP) Senator Hontiveros, Ana Theresia Akbayan Hontiveros, Risa (AKBYN) Senator Jaafar, Jay Angelique Independent Jaafar, Princess Angel (IND) Senator Kabalu, Mustapha Independent Kabalu, Eid (IND) Senator Kapunan, Lorna Aksyon Demokratiko Kapunan, Atty. Lorna (AKSYON) Senator Kiram, Princess Jacel United Nationalist Alliance Kiram, Princess Jacel (UNA) Senator Lacsamana, Venesa United Nationalist Alliance Lacsamana, Alma Moreno (UNA) Senator Lacson, Panfilo Independent Lacson, Panfilo (IND) Senator Lagare, Sixto Independent Lagare, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001
    ICPSR 2683 Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001 Virginia Sapiro W. Philips Shively Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 4th ICPSR Version February 2004 Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research P.O. Box 1248 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 www.icpsr.umich.edu Terms of Use Bibliographic Citation: Publications based on ICPSR data collections should acknowledge those sources by means of bibliographic citations. To ensure that such source attributions are captured for social science bibliographic utilities, citations must appear in footnotes or in the reference section of publications. The bibliographic citation for this data collection is: Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Secretariat. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS, 1996-2001 [Computer file]. 4th ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer], 2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2004. Request for Information on To provide funding agencies with essential information about use of Use of ICPSR Resources: archival resources and to facilitate the exchange of information about ICPSR participants' research activities, users of ICPSR data are requested to send to ICPSR bibliographic citations for each completed manuscript or thesis abstract. Visit the ICPSR Web site for more information on submitting citations. Data Disclaimer: The original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for uses of this collection or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses. Responsible Use In preparing data for public release, ICPSR performs a number of Statement: procedures to ensure that the identity of research subjects cannot be disclosed. Any intentional identification or disclosure of a person or establishment violates the assurances of confidentiality given to the providers of the information.
    [Show full text]
  • ISSP Background Variable Documentation in the Philippines
    1 ISSP Background Variable Documentation in the Philippines ISSP 2005 Module on Work Orientations III SEX - Sex of respondent National Language English Translation Question no. ISSP1/Sex. Gender of PR ISSP1/Sex. Gender of PR and text Codes/ 1 Male 1 Male Categories 2 Female 2 Female Interviewer Instruction Translation Note Note Construction/Recoding: Country Variable Codes (in translation) SEX 1. Male 1. Male 2. Female 2. Female -not used- 9. No answer, refused Documentation for ISSP background variables © ZA/ZUMA-GESIS 2 AGE - Age of respondent National Language English Translation Question no. ISSP2/AGE. Actual Age ISSP2/AGE. Actual Age and text Interviewer Instruction Translation Note Note Construction/Recoding: (list lowest, highest, and ‘missing’ codes only, replace terms in [square brackets] with real numbers) Country Variable Codes/Construction Rules AGE Construction Codes 18 years old [18] 89 years old [89] 97. No answer, 99. Refused 99. No answer, refused Optional: Recoding Syntax Documentation for ISSP background variables © ZA/ZUMA-GESIS 3 MARITAL - R: Marital status National Language English Translation Question no. ISSP3. Marital Status of PR ISSP3. Marital Status of PR and text 1 May asawa 1 Married 2 Balo 2 Widowed 3 Diborsyado 3 Divorced Codes/ 4 Hiwalay 4 Separated/Married but separated/ not Categories living with legal spouse 5 Walang asawa 5 Single/never married 9 No answer 9 No answer Interviewer Instruction Translation Note Note Construction/Recoding: Country Variable Codes/Construction Rules Marital 1. Married 1. Married, living with legal spouse 2. Widowed 2. Widowed 3. Divorced 3. Divorced 4. Separated/Married but separated/ not living with 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Bundestagswahl 2017
    B UU NN DD EE SS TT AA GG SS WW AA HH LL B A M 2 4 . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 7 Endgültige Ergebnisse für den Kreis Borken ● Ergebnisse nach Wahlkreisen ● Ergebnisse für den Kreis Borken insgesamt ● Ergebnisse nach Städten und Gemeinden im Kreis Borken - 2 - BUNDESTAGSWAHL 2017 HERAUSGEBER: KREIS BORKEN – DER LANDRAT – BURLOER STR. 93 46325 BORKEN INTERNET: WWW.KREIS-BORKEN.DE REDAKTION: 15 – STABSSTELLE BEARBEITUNG: MARKUS WYDERA TELEFON: 02861/ 82 2114 TELEFAX: 02861 / 82 271 2114 E-MAIL: [email protected] ZIMMER: 2114 (FLUR 1A) DRUCK: EIGENDRUCK BORKEN IM OKTOBER 2017 - 3 - BUNDESTAGSWAHL 2017 BUNDESTAGSWAHL AM 24. SEPTEMBER 2017 INHALTSVERZEICHNIS INHALT SEITE KARTE DER BUNDESTAGSWAHLKREISE 124 UND 126 ............................................................. 4 BEVÖLKERUNGSSTRUKTUR IN DEN STÄDTEN UND GEMEINDEN DES KREISES BORKEN IN DEN WAHLKREISEN 124 UND 126 .................................................................................................. 5 ERGEBNISSE DER BUNDESTAGSWAHL AM 24. SEPTEMBER 2017 NACH WAHLKREISEN TABELLE: ERSTSTIMMEN IN DEN WAHLKREISEN 124 UND 126 UND VERGLEICHSERGEBNISSE GRAFIKEN: DER BUNDESTAGSWAHL 2013 ............................................................................................................ 6-7 TABELLEN: ZWEITSTIMMEN IN DEN WAHLKREISEN UND VERGLEICHSERGEBNISSE DER BUNDESTAGSWAHL 2013 WAHLKREIS 124 (STEINFURT I - BORKEN I) ....................................................................... 8 WAHLKREIS 126 (BORKEN II) ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Emily Edmonds-Poli and David A. Shirk 2009- Contemporary Mexican Politics
    CONTEMPORARY MEXICAN POLITICS EMILY EDMONDS-POLI and DAVID A. SHIRK ContempMexPolPBK.indd 1 10/16/08 12:23:29 PM #/.4%-0/2!29 -%8)#!.0/,)4)#3 CONTEMPORARY MEXIC AN POLITICS Emily Edmonds-Poli and David A. Shirk ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD PUBLISHERS, INC. Lanham • Boulder • New York • Toronto • Plymouth, UK ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD PUBLISHERS, INC. Published in the United States of America by Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. A wholly owned subsidiary of The Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc. 4501 Forbes Boulevard, Suite 200, Lanham, Maryland 20706 www.rowmanlittlefield.com Estover Road, Plymouth PL6 7PY, United Kingdom Copyright © 2009 by Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Information Available Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Edmonds, Emily. Contemporary Mexican politics / Emily Edmonds-Poli and David A. Shirk. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-7425-4048-4 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-7425-4048-0 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978-0-7425-4049-1 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-7425-4049-9 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Mexico--Politics and government--2000- I. Shirk, David A., 1971- II. Title. F1236.7.E36 2009 320.972--dc22 2008031594 Printed in the United States of America ™ The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Schriftliche Anfrage
    Drucksache 17 / 13 586 Schriftliche Anfrage 17. Wahlperiode Schriftliche Anfrage der Abgeordneten Susanne Graf (PIRATEN) vom 08. April 2014 (Eingang beim Abgeordnetenhaus am 09. April 2014) und Antwort Auf die Plätze, Kitas, Stopp! – Abgelehnte und wartende Projekte im Kita- Ausbauprogramm Im Namen des Senats von Berlin beantworte ich Ihre fordernissen ausschlaggebend für die Entscheidung, Schriftliche Anfrage wie folgt: welchen Vorhaben der Vorrang gegeben worden ist. Anträge wurden von Seiten der Antragstellerinnen 1. Wie viele und welche Träger haben in den Jahren und Antragsteller zurückgezogen. 2012 und 2013 für welche Kita-Ausbau- und Neubau- projekte Mittel aus dem Landesprogramm “Auf die Plät- Die Vergabeentscheidungen basieren auf der Förder- ze, Kitas, los” in welcher Höhe beantragt, aber nicht be- richtlinie über die Gewährung von Zuwendungen für willigt bekommen (bitte nach Bezirken aufschlüsseln)? Maßnahmen zum bedarfsgerechten Ausbau der Kinderta- a) Was waren jeweils die konkreten Gründe für die gesbetreuung in Berlin (Förderrichtlinie – Kitaausbaupro- Ablehnung der Bewilligung der Mittel? gramm). Danach müssen folgende Voraussetzungen für eine Förderung erfüllt sein: 3. Nach welchen konkreten Kriterien entscheidet der Senat über die Vergabe der Mittel aus dem Landes- Das beantragte Projekt muss einen Beitrag zur Ge- programm “Auf die Plätze, Kitas, los!”? währleistung eines bedarfsgerechten Versorgungs- netzes leisten bzw. zu entsprechenden Versorgungs- Zu 1. und 3.: Die Veröffentlichung der abgelehnten strukturen aus gesamtstädtischer Sicht beitragen. Anträge ist nach Sozialgesetzbuch (SGB) §§ 35 SGB I, 61 Das Vorhaben muss notwendig und dringlich sein ff SGB VIII, 67 SGB X rechtlich nicht zulässig, da Rück- und zum Defizitabbau beitragen. schlüsse auf Geschäftsgeheimnisse der Träger gezogen Das Vorhaben muss den Prinzipien der Wirtschaft- werden können.
    [Show full text]
  • The Electoral Geography of European Radical Left Parties Since 1990
    ‘Red Belts’ anywhere? The electoral geography of European radical left parties since 1990 Petar Nikolaev Bankov, BA, MSc Submitted in the fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Social and Political Sciences College of Social Sciences University of Glasgow January 2020 Abstract European radical left parties (RLPs) are on the rise across Europe. Since 1990 they became an integral part of the party systems across the continent and enjoy an increased level of government participation and policy clout. The main source for this improved position is their increasing electoral support in the past three decades, underpinned by a diversity of electoral geographies. Understood as the patterns of territorial distribution of electoral support across electoral units, the electoral geographies are important, as they indicate the effects of the socio-economic and political changes in Europe on these parties. This thesis studies the sources of the electoral geographies of European RLPs since 1990. The existing literature on these parties highlighted the importance of their electoral geographies for understanding their electoral and governmental experiences. Yet, to this date, it lacks systematic research on these territorial distributions of electoral support in their own right. Such research is important also for the general literature on the spatial distribution of electoral performance. In particular, these works paid limited attention to the relevance of their theories for individual political parties, as they
    [Show full text]
  • Wahlkreise Nach Parteien Und Zweitstimmenanteil
    Endgültiges Ergebnis der Bundestagswahl 2009 9 Wahlkreise nach Parteien und Zweitstimmenanteil Lfd. Wahlkreis Länder- Zweitstimmen in % Nr. kennzeichen 2009 2005 SPD 001 124 Gelsenkirchen NW 42,0 53,8 002 117 Duisburg II NW 40,7 55,3 003 142 Herne - Bochum II NW 40,2 54,0 004 118 Oberhausen - Wesel III NW 39,4 53,9 005 120 Essen II NW 39,0 51,5 006 025 Aurich - Emden NI 38,8 55,9 007 145 Unna I NW 37,6 50,3 008 126 Bottrop - Recklinghausen III NW 37,1 50,4 009 123 Recklinghausen II NW 36,8 51,4 010 141 Bochum I NW 36,3 49,2 011 116 Duisburg I NW 36,3 49,9 012 144 Dortmund II NW 35,6 50,8 013 119 Mülheim - Essen I NW 35,6 47,6 014 122 Recklinghausen I NW 35,5 50,7 015 140 Ennepe-Ruhr-Kreis II NW 34,9 47,2 016 136 Lippe I NW 34,5 43,1 017 170 Werra-Meißner - Hersfeld-Rotenburg HE 34,4 45,3 018 050 Salzgitter - Wolfenbüttel NI 34,2 47,7 019 171 Schwalm-Eder HE 33,9 45,0 020 146 Hamm - Unna II NW 33,4 47,9 021 047 Hameln-Pyrmont - Holzminden NI 33,4 47,4 022 168 Waldeck HE 33,0 44,1 023 053 Goslar - Northeim - Osterode NI 33,0 45,9 024 143 Dortmund I NW 33,0 48,2 025 041 Nienburg II - Schaumburg NI 33,0 47,0 026 134 Herford - Minden-Lübbecke II NW 32,9 40,7 027 139 Hagen - Ennepe-Ruhr-Kreis I NW 32,9 45,8 028 049 Hildesheim NI 32,9 47,0 029 046 Gifhorn - Peine NI 32,9 46,4 030 048 Hannover-Land II NI 32,8 46,8 Endgültiges Ergebnis der Bundestagswahl 2009 9 Wahlkreise nach Parteien und Zweitstimmenanteil Lfd.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Athenian Democracy.Pdf
    Rethinking Athenian Democracy A dissertation presented by Daniela Louise Cammack to The Department of Government in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Political Science Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts January 2013 © 2013 Daniela Cammack All rights reserved. Professor Richard Tuck Daniela Cammack Abstract Conventional accounts of classical Athenian democracy represent the assembly as the primary democratic institution in the Athenian political system. This looks reasonable in the light of modern democracy, which has typically developed through the democratization of legislative assemblies. Yet it conflicts with the evidence at our disposal. Our ancient sources suggest that the most significant and distinctively democratic institution in Athens was the courts, where decisions were made by large panels of randomly selected ordinary citizens with no possibility of appeal. This dissertation reinterprets Athenian democracy as “dikastic democracy” (from the Greek dikastēs, “judge”), defined as a mode of government in which ordinary citizens rule principally through their control of the administration of justice. It begins by casting doubt on two major planks in the modern interpretation of Athenian democracy: first, that it rested on a conception of the “wisdom of the multitude” akin to that advanced by epistemic democrats today, and second that it was “deliberative,” meaning that mass discussion of political matters played a defining role. The first plank rests largely on an argument made by Aristotle in support of mass political participation, which I show has been comprehensively misunderstood. The second rests on the interpretation of the verb “bouleuomai” as indicating speech, but I suggest that it meant internal reflection in both the courts and the assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • International Human Rights Instruments
    UNITED NATIONS HRI International Distr. Human Rights GENERAL Instruments HRI/CORE/ISR/2008 21 November 2008 Original: ENGLISH CORE DOCUMENT FORMING PART OF THE REPORTS OF STATES PARTIES ISRAEL* [25 July 2008] * In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services. GE.08-45727 (E) 261208 HRI/CORE/ISR/2008 page 2 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page Part 1. General information about the State of Israel ....................................................... 6 Chapter I. DEMOGRAPHIC, ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS ....................................................................... 1 - 25 6 A. Geography ................................................................................... 1 - 3 6 B. Demographics ............................................................................. 4 - 9 6 C. Culture and religion .................................................................... 10 - 11 9 D. Indicators on the political system ............................................... 12 9 E. Languages ................................................................................... 13 - 15 11 F. Social economic indicators ......................................................... 16 - 20 12 G. Science and technology .............................................................. 21 16 H. Health care .................................................................................. 22 16
    [Show full text]