DOCSLIB.ORG

990-PF Return of Private Foundation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Return of Private Foundation OMB No 1545-0052 Form 990-PF or Section 4947(aX1) Trust Treated as Private Foundation Do not enter D. partment of the Treasury ► Social Security numbers on this form as it may be made public. Internal Revenue Service ► Information about Form 990-PF and its separate instructions is at wwwirc nnv/form For calendar year 2013 or tax year beginning , and ending Name of foundation A Employer identification number CHEHEBAR FAMILY FOUNDATION INC. 13-3178015 Number and street (or P 0 box number if mad Is not delivered to street address) Room/suite B Telephone number 1000 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE (718) 485-3000 City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code C If exemption application is pending , check here ► BROOKLYN, NY 11207-8417 G Check all that apply: L_J Initial return L_J Initial return of former public a charity D 1. Foreign organizations, check here ► Final return 0 Amended return 85% test, Q Address change Name change 2 chec, her end attach computati on H Check type of organization: Section 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation E If private foundation status was terminated 0 Section 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust L Other taxable private foundation under section 507(b)(1)(A), check here I Fair market value of all assets at end of year. J Accounting method: LXJ Cash L_J Accrual F If the foundation is in a 60-month termination (from Part ll, col. (c), line 16) 0 Other (specify) under section 507(b)(1)(B), check here 9 ,692,3 10 (Part 1, column (d) must be on cash basis.) Analysis of Revenue and Expenses Part I (a) Revenue and (b) Net investment (c) Adjusted net ( d) Disbursements (The total of amounts in columns (b), (c), and ( d) may not for charitable purposes necessarily equal the amounts in column (a)) expenses per books income income (cash basis only) I Contributions, gifts, grants, etc., received 3,605,889 . N/A 2 if the foundation is not required lo attach Sch B y 3 Interest on savings and temporary cash in vestments 6 , 591. 6 , 591. STATEMENT Z f 4 Dividends and interest from securities ,-, 5a Gross rents ® b Net rental income or (loss) y 6a Net gain or (loss) from sale of assets not on line 10 = Gross sales price for all b assets on line 6a 7 Capital gain net income (from Part IV, line 2) 0. 8 Net short-term capital gain 9 Income modifications Gross sales less returns 1()a and allowances b Less Cost of goods sold c Gross profit or (loss) 11 Other income 12 Total. Add lines 1 through 11 3, 6 12,480. 6,591. 13 Compensation of officers, directors , trustees , etc 0. 0. 0. 14 Other employee salaries and wages 15 Pension plans, employee benefits (D 16a Legal fees STMT 2 6 0,000. 0. 6 0,000. a`) b Accou tin fees a. W c Other rofess fee% 17 I ntere t L; M 18 Taxes o •E 19 Deprgefat n and'd^ple n° 20}4 p E 20 TaOccxe an 4 21 Travel, con ces, a ^re 1 22 Prin an ubhcletto hs l' 'z 23 Other expenses TMT-'3 3 0. 3 40. M 24 Total operating and administrative a expenses . Add lines 13 through 23 60, 340. 0. 60, 340. 0 25 Contributions, gifts, grants paid . 3,302, 383. 3,302, 383. 26 Total expenses and disbursements. Add lines 24 and 25 3, 362, 723. 0. 3, 362, 723. 27 Subtract line 26 from line 12: a Excess of revenue over expenses and disbursements 249,757. b Net investment income (if negative, enter -0-) , 5 9 c Adjusted net income (if negative. enter -0-) N / A rurru -rr (cu 1,31 2 14501111 715668 51782 2013.05000 CHEHEBAR FAMILY F UNDATION 517821 Form990.PF 2013 CHEHEBAR FAMILY FOUNDATION INC. 13-3178015 Paget Beginning of year End of year Part ii Balance Sheets Attached schedules and amounts in the descnplson column should be for end-of-year amounts only (a) Book Value (b) Book Value (c) Fair Market Value 1 Cash - non-interest-bearing 2 Savings and temporary cash investments 6 35,705. 5 1, 7 4. 5 7. 3 Accounts receivable ► Less: allowance for doubtful accounts ► 4 Pledges receivable ► Less: allowance for doubtful accounts ► 5 Grants receivable 6 Receivables due from officers, directors, trustees, and other disqualified persons 7 Other notes and loans receivable ► Less: allowance for doubtful accounts ► 8 Inventories for sale or use y 9 Prepaid expenses and deferred charges 2,504. 2,503. 2,503. a 10a Investments -U.S. and state government obligations STMT 4 8,0 6 0,038. 8 , 0 6 6 , 10 7 . 8 , 0 0 7 . b Investments - corporate stock c Investments - corporate bonds 11 Investments • land, buildings , andequipment basis ► - - - _ - j Less accumulated depreciation ► 12 Investments - mortgage loans 13 Investments - other S TMT 5 735, 305. 923, 025. 932,02 6 . 14 Land, buildings, and equipment: basis ► Less accumulated depreciation ► 15 Other assets (describe ► LOAN RECEIVABLE ) 5 0 , 0 07 5 , TTUT 16 Total assets (to be completed by all filers - see the instructions. Also, see page 1, item 1 ) 9,433,552. 9,683,309. 9,692,310. 17 Accounts payable and accrued expenses 18 Grants payable u) 19 Deferred revenue _ 20 Loans from officers , directors , trustees, and other disqualified persons 20 21 Mortgages and other notes payable 22 Other liabilities (describe ► 23 Total liabilities (add lines 17 through 22) 0. 0. Foundations that follow SFAS 117, check here ► and complete lines 24 through 26 and lines 30 and 31. 24 Unrestricted 25 Temporarily restricted m 26 Permanently restricted c Foundations that do not follow SFAS 117, check here ► LL and complete lines 27 through 31. to 27 Capital stock, trust principal, or current funds 0. 0 y 28 Paid-in or capital surplus, or land, bldg., and equipment fund 0. 0 a 29 Retained earnings, accumulated income, endowment, or other funds 9, 473 , 55 2. 9 . Z" 30 Total net assets or fund balances 9,433,752. 9, 6 83,30 9 31 Total liabilities and net assets/fund balances 9,433,552. 9,683,309 . Part Ill Analysis of Changes in Net Assets or Fund Balances 1 Total net assets or fund balances at beginning of year - Part II, column (a), line 30 (must agree with end-of-year figure reported on prior year's return) 9,433,552. 2 Enter amount from Part I, line 27a 249,757. 3 Other increases not included in line 2 (itemize) ► 3 0. 4 Add lines 1, 2, and 3 4 9, 6 83,309. 5 Decreases not included in line 2 (itemize) ► 0. 6 Total net assets or fund balances at end of year (line 4 minus line 5) - Part II, column (b), line 30 9,683,309. Form 990-PF (2013) 323511 10-10-13 3 14501111 715668 51782 2013.05000 CHEHEBAR FAMILY FOUNDATION 517821 Form 990,PF(2013) CHEHEBAR FAMILY FOUNDATION INC. 13-3178015 Page3 Part IV Capital G ains and Losses for-Tax on Investment Income (a) List and describe the kind(s) of property sold (e.g., real estate, ow acquire (c) Date acquired (d) Date sold Purchase 2-story brick warehouse; or common stock, 200 shs. MLC Co.) D Donation (mo., day, yr.) (mo ,day, yr.) 1a b NONE C d e (e) Gross sales price (f) Depreciation allowed (g) Cost or other basis (h) Gain or (loss) (or allowable) plus expense of sale (e) plus (f) minus (g) a b c d e Complete only for assets showing gain in column (h) and owned by the foundation on 12/31/69 (I) Gains (Col. (h) gain minus (j) Adjusted basis (k) Excess of col. (i) col. (k), but not less than -0-) or Losses (from col. (h)) (i) F.M.V. as of 12/31/69 as of 12/31/69 over col. (j), if any a b C d e If gain, also enter in Part I, line 7 2 Capital gain net income or (net capital loss) If (loss), enter -0- in Part I, line 7 2 3 Net short-term capital gain or (loss) as defined in sections 1222(5) and (6). If gain, also enter in Part I, line 8, column (c). If ( loss ), enter -0- in Part I, line 8 3 Partrt V Qualification Under Section 4940(e) for Reduced Tax on Net Investment Income (For optional use by domestic private foundations subject to the section 4940(a) tax on net investment income.) It section 4940(d)(2) applies, leave this part blank. Was the foundation liable for the section 4942 tax on the distributable amount of any year in the base period? Yes ® No If'Yes; the foundation does not qualify under section 4940 (e). Do not complete this part. 1 Enter the appropriate amount in each column for each year; see the instructions before making any entries. (a) Bas( perioy years ) (c) ( D istribution ratio ( )) Calendar year or tax year beginning in Adjusted qualifying(m distributions Net value of noncharitable - use assets col. b ) divide d by col. c 2012 2,674, 882. 9 ,0 2,271. .295820 2011 3,506,250. 9, 4 13,8 6 8. .372 4 5 6 2010 3,50 07. 1 0,0 14,6 63. 350147 2009 ,005,0 2. 0,01 ,383. .399849 2008 3,902,303. 10,09 4 ,3 T 9. ___-_3_8T5 83 2 Total of line 1 , column (d) 2 1.804855 3 Average distribution ratio for the 5-year base period - divide the total on line 2 by 5, or by the number of years the foundation has been in existence if less than 5 years _ 3 .360971 4 Enter the net value of noncharitable - use assets for 2013 from Part X, line 5 _ 4 8 ,965,985.
Recommended publications
  • Israel's National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict

    Israel's National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict

    Leap of Faith: Israel’s National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict Middle East Report N°147 | 21 November 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iv I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Religious Zionism: From Ascendance to Fragmentation ................................................ 5 A. 1973: A Turning Point ................................................................................................ 5 B. 1980s and 1990s: Polarisation ................................................................................... 7 C. The Gaza Disengagement and its Aftermath ............................................................. 11 III. Settling the Land .............................................................................................................. 14 A. Bargaining with the State: The Kookists ................................................................... 15 B. Defying the State: The Hilltop Youth ........................................................................ 17 IV. From the Hills to the State ..............................................................................................
  • Return of Private Foundation

    Return of Private Foundation

    l efile GRAPHIC p rint - DO NOT PROCESS As Filed Data - DLN: 93491015004014 Return of Private Foundation OMB No 1545-0052 Form 990 -PF or Section 4947( a)(1) Nonexempt Charitable Trust Treated as a Private Foundation Department of the Treasury 2012 Note . The foundation may be able to use a copy of this return to satisfy state reporting requirements Internal Revenue Service • . For calendar year 2012 , or tax year beginning 06 - 01-2012 , and ending 05-31-2013 Name of foundation A Employer identification number CENTURY 21 ASSOCIATES FOUNDATION INC 22-2412138 O/o RAYMOND GINDI ieiepnone number (see instructions) Number and street (or P 0 box number if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite U 22 CORTLANDT STREET Suite City or town, state, and ZIP code C If exemption application is pending, check here F NEW YORK, NY 10007 G Check all that apply r'Initial return r'Initial return of a former public charity D 1. Foreign organizations, check here (- r-Final return r'Amended return 2. Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test, r Address change r'Name change check here and attach computation H Check type of organization FSection 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation r'Section 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust r'Other taxable private foundation J Accounting method F Cash F Accrual E If private foundation status was terminated I Fair market value of all assets at end und er section 507 ( b )( 1 )( A ), c hec k here F of y e a r (from Part 77, col. (c), Other (specify) _ F If the foundation is in a 60-month termination line 16)x$ 4,783,143
  • Anti-Olmert Rally, Part 1

    Anti-Olmert Rally, Part 1

    Anti-Olmert Rally, Part 1 In the May 1 visit to Meretz USA of Meretz MK Avshalom (Abu) Vilan, he told us of imploring Gen. Uzi Dayan (the organizer of this past weekend’s oust- Olmert rally) to press the goal of Olmert’s resignation but not of a new election, for two reasons: 1. Frequent elections are making Israel’s government unstable; the last election was little more than a year ago. 2. More importantly, Netanyahu would be returned to power at the head of about 35 Likud MKs. Abu feels that it would be far better that Peres or Livni replace Olmert with a new Kadima-led coalition and that with Meretz’s support, embark upon new avenues toward peace, via the Saudis, the US, Abbas and the European Union. He personally trusts Peres more than Livni, feeling that Livni’s not experienced enough and that her right-wing Likud roots make her suspect. But I find Peres ultimately untrustworthy because of his habit as a political intriguer. Hence, I think that Livni might be better, but either one as PM would be a source of new hope. Below is an abbreviated description of last week’s oust-Olmert rally from the MideastWeb for Coexistence site, by one Joseph M. Hochstein of Tel Aviv: What made this demonstration different from others was the crowd’s diversity. Members of opposing political factions shared the square. Young men wearing National Religious knitted skullcaps prayed in groups alongside secular Tel Aviv residents. … The closest the audience came to a display of vocal unanimity was when Eliad Shraga, a reserve paratroop officer who heads the Movement for Quality Government, exhorted them to act as judge and jury and answer whether Olmert was guilty.
  • The Purpose of This Paper Is to Assess Various Unilateral Evacuation

    The Purpose of This Paper Is to Assess Various Unilateral Evacuation

    CONFIDENTIAL NOT FOR CIRCULATION MEMORANDUM TO: DR. SAEB ERAKAT FROM: NSU SETTLEMENTS FILE SUBJECT: PRE-PERMANENT STATUS SETTLEMENT EVACUATIONS (PART I): AN ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING PROPOSALS DATE: 30 APRIL 2006 The purpose of this paper is to assess various unilateral evacuation proposals put forth thus far, including Kadima’s “convergence” plan, and their implications for Palestinian interests. I. BACKGROUND Since the evacuation of some 8,500 Israeli settlers from Gaza and four small West Bank settlements as part of Sharon’s unilateral “disengagement” plan, there are growing indications that Israel may seek to carry out further settlement evacuations (as distinct from military withdrawals or redeployments) on a unilateral basis. While a negotiated settlement evacuation remains the preferred strategic option for Palestinians, the growing acceptability of Israeli unilateralism in Israel and abroad suggests that Palestinians may be forced to prepare for the possibility of further disengagement-type evacuations prior to (or instead of) permanent status negotiations, most likely in the context of a “state with provisional borders”. Many in Israel and elsewhere appear to view further unilateral settlement evacuations with increasing favor, particularly if Israeli and/or international confidence in the PA continues to wane. A recent poll shows that a slight majority of Israelis (51%) would favor further unilateral ‘disengagement-type’ evacuations by Israel in the event of the Palestinian leadership’s inability to negotiate or deliver a permanent status deal.1 Indeed, Israeli and international support for unilateralism may now be even higher following Hamas’s recent election victory. A number of unilateral evacuation proposals have already been put forward since the Gaza evacuation, by both the Israeli “left” and “center”.
  • International Human Rights Instruments

    International Human Rights Instruments

    UNITED NATIONS HRI International Distr. Human Rights GENERAL Instruments HRI/CORE/ISR/2008 21 November 2008 Original: ENGLISH CORE DOCUMENT FORMING PART OF THE REPORTS OF STATES PARTIES ISRAEL* [25 July 2008] * In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services. GE.08-45727 (E) 261208 HRI/CORE/ISR/2008 page 2 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page Part 1. General information about the State of Israel ....................................................... 6 Chapter I. DEMOGRAPHIC, ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS ....................................................................... 1 - 25 6 A. Geography ................................................................................... 1 - 3 6 B. Demographics ............................................................................. 4 - 9 6 C. Culture and religion .................................................................... 10 - 11 9 D. Indicators on the political system ............................................... 12 9 E. Languages ................................................................................... 13 - 15 11 F. Social economic indicators ......................................................... 16 - 20 12 G. Science and technology .............................................................. 21 16 H. Health care .................................................................................. 22 16
  • The Redemptive Scenario of Rabbi Zvi Tau

    The Redemptive Scenario of Rabbi Zvi Tau

    Philistines and the Future of Zionism The redemptive scenario of Rabbi Zvi Tau That the Bible has played a central role in the history of Zionism is an indisputable fact. But how does it influence Israel’s current political reality? Is it a source of inspiration? Is it an historical testimony? Or could it be that Scripture is also scripting our very present? { By YOSEF ACHITUV 70 | Vol. 1 Spring 2008 Philistines and the Future of Zionism /// The Redemptive Scenario of Rabbi Zvi Tau HAVRUTA | 71 he Orthodox nationalism of the eternal warmongers in God’s historical Rabbi Zvi Tau, an important plan, and must be dealt with accordingly. World War II veteran and his grandson in figure in contemporary Tau’s argument is all the more fascinating their sukkah religious Zionist circles, blends because of the Jewish sources that underlie /// Margelan, Fergana allT three of these ideas. Born in 1936, Tau it. He relies on a very specific reading of Valley, Uzbekistan, USSR, 1987 was a disciple of Rabbi Zvi Yehuda Kook, biblical commentaries by Elijah, the Gaon of the predominant religious ideologue of Vilna (known as “the GRA”), the towering the Greater Land of Israel movement after 18th-century sage famed for his fierce the Six-Day War. In 1997, Rabbi Tau led a opposition to Hasidism. Tau interprets the walkout of rabbis and students from the Vilna Gaon within the spiritual framework famous Merkaz Harav Yeshiva to found a of Rav Kook, who taught that the renewal competing institute, Yeshivat Har Hamor. of Jewish sovereignty in the Holy Land The rift followed bitter disagreements constitutes one of the final stages in the regarding adherence to the teachings of attainment of Redemption.
  • Australian Olim Survey Findings Report

    Australian Olim Survey Findings Report

    MONAMONASH SH AUSTRALAUSTRALIAN IAN CENTRECENT FORRE FOR JEWISJEH WCIIVSIHLI CSAIVTILIIOSNA TION GEN17 AUSTRALIAN JEWISH COMMUNITY SURVEY AUSSIESJEWISH EDUCATION IN THE IN PROMISEDMELBOURNE LAND:ANDREW MARKUS , MIRIAM MUNZ AND TANYA MUNZ FINDINGS FROM THE AUSTRALIAN OLIM SURVEY (2018- 19) Building S,Bu Caildiunlgfi eS,ld Cacampulfieulsd campus 900 Dandenong900 Dandenong Road Road Caulfield CaEausltf iVIeldC Ea31s4t5 VI C 3145 www.monwww.ash.emodun/aarstsh/.aecdjuc / arts/acjc DAVID MITTELBERG AND ADINA BANKIER-KARP All rights reserved © David Mittelberg and Adina Bankier-Karp First published 2020 Australian Centre for Jewish Civilisation Faculty of Arts Monash University Victoria 3800 https://arts.monash.edu/acjc ISBN: 978-0-6486654-9-6 The photograph on the cover of this report was taken by David Bankier and has been used with his written permission. This work is copyright. Apart for any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part of it may be reproduced without written permission from the publisher. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction rights should be directed to the publisher. CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................................. 1 AUTHORS ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................
  • Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019

    Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019

    WID.world WORKING PAPER N° 2020/17 Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019 Yonatan Berman August 2020 Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949{2019 Yonatan Berman∗ y August 20, 2020 Abstract This paper draws on pre- and post-election surveys to address the long run evolution of vot- ing patterns in Israel from 1949 to 2019. The heterogeneous ethnic, cultural, educational, and religious backgrounds of Israelis created a range of political cleavages that evolved throughout its history and continue to shape its political climate and its society today. De- spite Israel's exceptional characteristics, we find similar patterns to those found for France, the UK and the US. Notably, we find that in the 1960s{1970s, the vote for left-wing parties was associated with lower social class voters. It has gradually become associated with high social class voters during the late 1970s and later. We also find a weak inter-relationship between inequality and political outcomes, suggesting that despite the social class cleavage, identity-based or \tribal" voting is still dominant in Israeli politics. Keywords: Political cleavages, Political economy, Income inequality, Israel ∗London Mathematical Laboratory, The Graduate Center and Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality, City University of New York, [email protected] yI wish to thank Itai Artzi, Dror Feitelson, Amory Gethin, Clara Mart´ınez-Toledano, and Thomas Piketty for helpful discussions and comments, and to Leah Ashuah and Raz Blanero from Tel Aviv-Yafo Municipality for historical data on parliamentary elections in Tel Aviv.
  • Return of Private Foundation

    Return of Private Foundation

    Return of Private Foundation OMB No 1545-0052 Form 990- PF or Section 4947(ax1) Trust Treated as Private Foundation 10, Do not enter Social Security numbers on this form as it may be made public. Deparunent of the Treasury 2013 Internal Revenue Service Information about Form 990-PF and its sep arate instructions is at yvyvwj,' ov/form990 f. n to Publ ic I nspect ion For calendar year 2013 or tax year beginning , and ending Name of foundation A Employer identification number RALPH J. HARAR Y FOUNDATION, INC. 22-2457455 Number and street (or P O box number if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/surte B Telephone number C/O MORET GROUP 212-736-0041 City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code C If exemption application is pending, check here NEW YORK , NY 10018 G Check all that apply. Initial return 0 Initial return of a former public charity D 1. Foreign organizations, check here 0 Final return 0 Amended return 2. Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test, Address change Name chan g e check here and attach computation ► Check H type of organization : ® Section 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation E If private foundation status was terminated Section 4947(a )( 1 ) nonexempt charitable trust Other taxable private foundation under section 507(b)(1)(A), check here Fair I market value of all assets at end of year J Accounting method: ® Cash 0 Accrual F If the foundation is in a 60-month termination (from Part ll, col. (c), line 16) 0 Other ( specify) under section 507(b)(1)(B), check here $ 2 0 5 , 0 9 4 .
  • Vertientes Del Judaismo #3

    Vertientes Del Judaismo #3

    CLASES DE JUDAISMO VERTIENTES DEL JUDAISMO #3 Por: Eliyahu BaYonah Director Shalom Haverim Org New York Vertientes del Judaismo • LA ORTODOXIA MODERNA • La Ortodoxia moderna comprende un espectro bastante amplio de movimientos, cada extracción toma varias filosofías aunque relacionados distintamente, que en alguna combinación han proporcionado la base para todas las variaciones del movimiento de hoy en día. • En general, la ortodoxia moderna sostiene que la ley judía es normativa y vinculante, y concede al mismo tiempo un valor positivo para la interacción con la sociedad contemporánea. Vertientes del Judaismo • LA ORTODOXIA MODERNA • En este punto de vista, el judaísmo ortodoxo puede "ser enriquecido" por su intersección con la modernidad. • Además, "la sociedad moderna crea oportunidades para ser ciudadanos productivos que participan en la obra divina de la transformación del mundo en beneficio de la humanidad". • Al mismo tiempo, con el fin de preservar la integridad de la Halajá, cualquier área de “fuerte inconsistencia y conflicto" entre la Torá y la cultura moderna debe ser evitada. La ortodoxia moderna, además, asigna un papel central al "Pueblo de Israel " Vertientes del Judaismo • LA ORTODOXIA MODERNA • La ortodoxia moderna, como una corriente del judaísmo ortodoxo representado por instituciones como el Consejo Nacional para la Juventud Israel, en Estados Unidos, es pro-sionista y por lo tanto da un estatus nacional, así como religioso, de mucha importancia en el Estado de Israel, y sus afiliados que son, por lo general, sionistas en la orientación. • También practica la implicación con Judíos no ortodoxos que se extiende más allá de "extensión (kiruv)" a las relaciones institucionales y la cooperación continua, visto como Torá Umaddá.
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 3

    Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Module 3

    COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES Original CSES file name: cses2_codebook_part3_appendices.txt (Version: Full Release - December 15, 2015) GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences Publication (pdf-version, December 2015) ============================================================================================= COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS (CSES) - MODULE 3 (2006-2011) CODEBOOK: APPENDICES APPENDIX I: PARTIES AND LEADERS APPENDIX II: PRIMARY ELECTORAL DISTRICTS FULL RELEASE - DECEMBER 15, 2015 VERSION CSES Secretariat www.cses.org =========================================================================== HOW TO CITE THE STUDY: The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (www.cses.org). CSES MODULE 3 FULL RELEASE [dataset]. December 15, 2015 version. doi:10.7804/cses.module3.2015-12-15 These materials are based on work supported by the American National Science Foundation (www.nsf.gov) under grant numbers SES-0451598 , SES-0817701, and SES-1154687, the GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, the University of Michigan, in-kind support of participating election studies, the many organizations that sponsor planning meetings and conferences, and the many organizations that fund election studies by CSES collaborators. Any opinions, findings and conclusions, or recommendations expressed in these materials are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the funding organizations. =========================================================================== IMPORTANT NOTE REGARDING FULL RELEASES: This dataset and all accompanying documentation is the "Full Release" of CSES Module 3 (2006-2011). Users of the Final Release may wish to monitor the errata for CSES Module 3 on the CSES website, to check for known errors which may impact their analyses. To view errata for CSES Module 3, go to the Data Center on the CSES website, navigate to the CSES Module 3 download page, and click on the Errata link in the gray box to the right of the page.
  • The Country the Capital & the Crown Yom Haazmaut 5777/2017 Danny

    The Country the Capital & the Crown Yom Haazmaut 5777/2017 Danny

    The Country the Capital & the Crown Yom Haazmaut 5777/2017 Danny Myers 1 2 1. Introduction On September 1, 1947, UNSCOP, the U.N. Committee on Palestine, recommended to partition Palestine into two states. Remarkably, it was 50 years to the day (1/9/1897) that Herzl wrote in his diary that within 50 years, a Jewish State would be created! On May 14, 1948, the British left Palestine, and on that very day David Ben Gurion proclaimed the State of Israel. Seven Arab armies attacked the new State, and, in arguably the greatest miracle in 2 millennia, the Jews emerged victorious! However, less than 2 decades later, the Arab world again was poised to destroy the Jewish Nation, with Nasser declaring an end to the Jewish State. 6 days later, the results were mystifying, with the State tripling its size! In addition to the jubilation, two major issues took center stage, and are still points of major contention until this very day: 1) how to deal with the re-conquered land, and 2) how to relate to the Har Habayit/Mikdash site, Judaism‘s holiest area. With the upcoming celebration of the 50th year since Jerusalem's reunification, it is most appropriate to analyze the topic of the Har Habayit. (Technically, the Har Habayit is a specific Halachik area measuring 500 by 500 Amot, which has a certain level of Kedusha, while The Temple Mount, as it is referred to today, is a much larger area which contains the Har Habayit, and is considered Halachically equal to Jerusalem, according to most Poskim.