DOCSLIB.ORG

Extreme Makeover? (I): Israel's Politics of Land and Faith in East Jerusalem

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Extreme Makeover? (I): Israel's Politics of Land and Faith in East Jerusalem EXTREME MAKEOVER? (I): ISRAEL’S POLITICS OF LAND AND FAITH IN EAST JERUSALEM Middle East Report N°134 – 20 December 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................. i I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 A. JERUSALEM TODAY ..................................................................................................................... 1 B. ISRAELI OBJECTIVES: TERRITORY AND DEMOGRAPHY ................................................................. 4 C. JERUSALEM TOMORROW .............................................................................................................. 5 II. JERUSALEM’S THREE BELTS .................................................................................... 7 A. THE OUTER BELT: CONSOLIDATING GREATER JERUSALEM........................................................ 10 B. THE MIDDLE BELT: JERUSALEM’S RESIDENTIAL SETTLEMENTS ................................................ 13 C. THE INNER BELT: ISRAEL’S HOLY BASIN ................................................................................... 15 III. TEMPLE MOUNT ACTIVISM .................................................................................... 21 IV. TERRITORIAL CHANGES AND THE CONCEPT OF VIABILITY .................... 25 V. CONCLUSION: CAN THE EGG BE UNSCRAMBLED? ........................................ 27 APPENDICES A. MAP OF ISRAEL AND THE OCCUPIED TERRITORIES ........................................................................... 31 The following additional maps are included in the main text: Jerusalem and Its Environs ........................................................................................................................ 2 Occupied East Jerusalem .......................................................................................................................... 9 Jerusalem’s Inner Core ........................................................................................................................... 16 B. ABOUT THE INTERNATIONAL CRISIS GROUP .................................................................................... 32 C. CRISIS GROUP REPORTS AND BRIEFINGS ON THE MIDDLE EAST AND NORTH AFRICA SINCE 2009 ... 33 D. CRISIS GROUP BOARD OF TRUSTEES ................................................................................................ 35 Middle East Report N°134 20 December 2012 EXTREME MAKEOVER? (I): ISRAEL’S POLITICS OF LAND AND FAITH IN EAST JERUSALEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Jerusalem no longer is the city it was in 2000, when Israe- lution. Part II, Extreme Makeover? (II): The Withering Away lis and Palestinians first negotiated its fate. In the interval, of East Jerusalem, looks at the emaciation of Palestinian much has changed, complicating the task of unscrambling political life in the city. the Jerusalem egg based on the formula presented by Pres- ident Clinton in December of that year: what is Jewish There are several critical territorial flashpoints. Particularly would be Israeli; what is Arab would be Palestinian; and significant are two horizontal bands – one each in central a special regime would govern sites holy to the three mon- and southern Jerusalem – that would extend a Jewish con- otheistic religions. It has become commonplace in some tinuum from west to east across the entire municipality quarters to decree that partitioning is now unfeasible giv- and beyond. Planning for residential units in the central en the pace and shape of settlement construction. Feasi- band (dubbed “E-1”) and in the southern band (including bility is an inexact science and, in theory at least, willing a new settlement, the first in Jerusalem since Har Homa mapmakers and determined policymakers still could im- in 1997, known as Givat HaMatos) – both of which have plement the same principle, if not draw precisely the same been on hold for several years owing to international line, as twelve years ago. pressure – has now resumed. E-1 is widely perceived as particularly damaging, because it would all but disconnect Yet, two things are incontrovertible. First, expansion of East Jerusalem from a Palestinian state and sever its urban Jewish settlements or neighbourhoods in East Jerusalem expanse. In southern Jerusalem, new Israeli construction raises the political price of partition and thus lowers its threatens to completely envelope some Arab neighbour- likelihood. The upshot is that the international community, hoods. These are only two of the disquieting settlement and notably the U.S., will have to pressure Israel to limit projects that the Israeli government has pushed forward further alteration to Jerusalem’s physical landscape; this following the 29 November 2012 UN General Assembly challenge is particularly acute today in light of recent set- resolution declaring Palestine a non-member observer state. tlement announcements that many see as potentially fatal Whether international pressure will stop these develop- to any two-state solution. The second, less tangible but ments, and for how long, is yet unclear. equally consequential reality is that changes in Israel and the region have intensified religious and historical claims Of all developments in the city, potentially the most ex- to the city. Whenever negotiations resume, each side will plosive lie within the inner core, where Jewish settlement need to acknowledge the other’s ties to Jerusalem and its within dense Palestinian neighbourhoods has accelerated. religious sites, and both sides will have to be open to cre- A ring of national parks, which open lands to Israeli usage ative solutions in tune with this new, emerging climate. and limits it for Palestinians, is being built around the city’s historic core. Within these parks, Israel has licensed ––––––––––––– archaeological and educational projects; the largest, the City Since Clinton offered his parameters, the Jewish popula- of David in the Palestinian neighbourhood of Silwan, has tion of East Jerusalem has grown significantly in each of become one of Israel’s most successful tourist attractions, the three belts – an outer belt that defines Greater Jerusa- with over 400,000 visitors a year. At the centre of contesta- lem, a middle belt that surrounds the city centre, and an tion stands the Holy Esplanade – Har HaBayit (The Tem- inner belt that runs through the city’s core – that structure ple Mount) to Jews and al-Haram al-Sharif (The Noble Israeli settlement in and around the city. The good news Sanctuary) to Muslims – which has an outsized effect on is that, so far, much of the increase has been in previously the conflict. Potent political-cum-theological developments built-up areas. The bad news is that settlement construction in Israel over the past fifteen years have prompted de- over the past 45 years has been so extensive as to make even mands for Jewish worship on the plateau, a potentially minor developments in strategic locations highly detrimen- explosive issue that will constrain the kinds of political tal to prospects of one day dividing the city. This report, solutions Israel someday might pursue. the first of two issued simultaneously, examines this evo- Extreme Makeover? (I): Israel’s Politics of Land and Faith in East Jerusalem Crisis Group Middle East Report N°134, 20 December 2012 Page ii A parallel evolution has taken place on the Palestinian side. vent settlement construction in E-1, protect the territorial The weakening of the non-Islamist national movement foundations for Jerusalem’s ultimate soft partition and coupled with Hamas’s greater influence almost certainly prepare the ground for a mutual recognition of claims. will hamper the search for an accommodation on this matter. It is early days still, but there is reason to suspect A negative diplomatic agenda of this sort – preventing that the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood – notably in Egypt harmful developments – is important but cannot suffice. – and the enhanced role of public opinion throughout the Nor is it likely to be sustainable; over time, it will erode. region will make it more difficult for Arab leaders to en- Also needed is a more positive vision. It is not too early to dorse solutions that opponents can portray as inconsistent dust off old proposals for the city, updating them in light with Islamic principles. of what did not work over a decade ago and what has changed since. Nor is it too late to more assertively sup- The implication of all this is not clear. Some critics of port the Arab presence and specifically residential con- Israel’s Jerusalem policy believe that accelerating settle- struction in the eastern part of the city, as opposed to ment in the inner core, the encroachment of Jewish settle- simply opposing Jewish building there. The international ments into Arab areas in the middle belt and the quicken- community, including Jordan, should push for an increase ing of planning for E-1 and its corresponding belt along in Arab residential development, in the form of both new the southern rim threaten the viability of a Palestinian neighbourhoods – not a single one has been permitted in state. Others contend that whatever has been built by acts the past 45 years – and new housing in existing ones. This of political will ultimately can be un-built by acts of polit- is not simply a matter of housing rights, but rather a fun- ical will. damental political issue of improving Palestinians’ ability to remain
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rapport Des Chefs De Mission Diplomatiques De L'union
    Rapport des Chefs de Mission Diplomatiques de l’Union Européenne sur Jérusalem 2017 Note de synthèse Les Chefs de Mission à Jérusalem et à Ramallah soumettent par le présent document au Comité Politique et de Sécurité le rapport sur Jérusalem pour 2017 (annexe 1) et une série de recommandations pour discussion pour renforcer la politique de l’Union Européenne sur Jérusalem Est (Annexe 2). L’annexe 3 contient des faits supplémentaires et des chiffres sur Jérusalem. Les développements intervenus en 2017 ont encore accéléré les difficultés de la solution « des deux Etats » en l’absence de processus de paix significatif. Les tendances précédentes, observées et décrites par les Chefs de Mission Diplomatiques depuis plusieurs années, se sont empirées. La mise à l’écart des Palestiniens de la vie ordinaire, politique, économique et sociale de la ville sont largement inchangées. Le développement d’un nombre record de plans de colonisation s’est poursuivi, y compris dans des zones identifiées par l’Union Européenne et ses Etats membres comme clés pour une solution « des deux Etats ». En même temps, les démolitions de logements palestiniens se sont poursuivies, et plusieurs familles palestiniennes ont été expulsées de leurs logements au bénéfice de colons. Les tensions autour du Dôme du Rocher / Mont du Temple continuent. Au cours de cette année, plusieurs projets de lois à la Knesset ont poursuivi leur avancée législative, qui, s’ils étaient adoptés, apporteraient des changements unilatéraux au statut et aux frontières de Jérusalem, en violation du droit international. En fin d’année, les Etats Unis ont annoncé leur reconnaissance de Jérusalem comme capitale d’Israël.
    [Show full text]
  • The Next Jerusalem
    The Next Introduction1 Jerusalem: Since the beginning of the Israeli-Palestinian Potential Futures conflict, the city of Jerusalem has been the subject of a number of transformations that of the Urban Fabric have radically changed its urban structure. Francesco Chiodelli Both the Israelis and the Palestinians have implemented different spatial measures in pursuit of their disparate political aims. However, it is the Israeli authorities who have played the key role in the process of the “political transformation” of the Holy City’s urban fabric, with the occupied territories of East Jerusalem, in particular, being the object of Israeli spatial action. Their aim has been the prevention of any possible attempt to re-divide the city.2 In fact, the military conquest in 1967 was not by itself sufficient to assure Israel that it had full and permanent The wall at Abu Dis. Source: Photo by Federica control of the “unified” city – actually, the Cozzio (2012) international community never recognized [ 50 ] The Next Jerusalem: Potential Futures of the Urban Fabric the 1967 Israeli annexation of the Palestinian territories, and the Palestinians never ceased claiming East Jerusalem as the capital of a future Palestinian state. So, since June 1967, after the overtly military phase of the conflict, Israeli authorities have implemented an “urban consolidation phase,” with the aim of making the military conquests irreversible precisely by modifying the urban space. Over the years, while there have been no substantial advances in terms of diplomatic agreements between the Israelis and the Palestinians about the status of Jerusalem, the spatial configuration of the city has changed constantly and quite unilaterally.
    [Show full text]
  • The-Legal-Status-Of-East-Jerusalem.Pdf
    December 2013 Written by: Adv. Yotam Ben-Hillel Cover photo: Bab al-Asbat (The Lion’s Gate) and the Old City of Jerusalem. (Photo by: JC Tordai, 2010) This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position or the official opinion of the European Union. The Norwegian Refugee Council (NRC) is an independent, international humanitarian non- governmental organisation that provides assistance, protection and durable solutions to refugees and internally displaced persons worldwide. The author wishes to thank Adv. Emily Schaeffer for her insightful comments during the preparation of this study. 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 5 2. Background ............................................................................................................................ 6 3. Israeli Legislation Following the 1967 Occupation ............................................................ 8 3.1 Applying the Israeli law, jurisdiction and administration to East Jerusalem .................... 8 3.2 The Basic Law: Jerusalem, Capital of Israel ................................................................... 10 4. The Status
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict
    Leap of Faith: Israel’s National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict Middle East Report N°147 | 21 November 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iv I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Religious Zionism: From Ascendance to Fragmentation ................................................ 5 A. 1973: A Turning Point ................................................................................................ 5 B. 1980s and 1990s: Polarisation ................................................................................... 7 C. The Gaza Disengagement and its Aftermath ............................................................. 11 III. Settling the Land .............................................................................................................. 14 A. Bargaining with the State: The Kookists ................................................................... 15 B. Defying the State: The Hilltop Youth ........................................................................ 17 IV. From the Hills to the State ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Marah Al-Bakri (Website of 48Arab)
    November 2, 2015 Initial Findings of the Profile of Palestinian Terrorists Who Carried Out Attacks in Israel in the Current Wave of Terrorism (Updated to October 25, 2015) The contagious effect of stabbing attacks: a notice posted to the Palestinian social networks, some of them affiliated with Hamas, reading "If you don't stand up for Jerusalem, who will?" It features recent postings written by terrorist operatives Muhannad Shafiq and Fadi Aloun, who were killed carrying out stabbing attacks in Jerusalem and became role models for terrorists who followed in their footsteps. Overview 1. The wave of Palestinian violence and terrorism currently plaguing Israel began during the most recent Jewish High Holidays. In retrospect, the ITIC has concluded it began with the stones thrown at the vehicle of Alexander Levlowitz near the Armon Hanatziv neighborhood of Jerusalem on September 14, 2015. Initially the wave of violence and terrorism focused on the Temple Mount and east Jerusalem and later spread throughout Jerusalem and to other sites inside Israel and various hotspots in Judea and Samaria (especially the region around Hebron). So far 12 1 Israelis and more than 70 Palestinians have been killed. 1 According to a spokesman of the Palestinian ministry of health so far 61 Palestinians have been killed (Voice of Palestine Radio, October 26, 2015). According to the written Palestinian media 71 Palestinians 179-15 2 2. The current wave of violence and terrorism is part of the overall "popular resistance" strategy adopted by the Palestinian Authority (PA) and Fatah at the Sixth Fatah Conference in August 2009.2 It is manifested by rising and falling levels of popular terrorism.
    [Show full text]
  • Sur Bahir & Umm Tuba Town Profile
    Sur Bahir & Umm Tuba Town Profile Prepared by The Applied Research Institute – Jerusalem Funded by Spanish Cooperation 2012 Palestinian Localities Study Jerusalem Governorate Acknowledgments ARIJ hereby expresses its deep gratitude to the Spanish agency for International Cooperation for Development (AECID) for their funding of this project. ARIJ is grateful to the Palestinian officials in the ministries, municipalities, joint services councils, village committees and councils, and the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS) for their assistance and cooperation with the project team members during the data collection process. ARIJ also thanks all the staff who worked throughout the past couple of years towards the accomplishment of this work. 1 Palestinian Localities Study Jerusalem Governorate Background This report is part of a series of booklets, which contain compiled information about each city, village, and town in the Jerusalem Governorate. These booklets came as a result of a comprehensive study of all villages in Jerusalem Governorate, which aims at depicting the overall living conditions in the governorate and presenting developmental plans to assist in developing the livelihood of the population in the area. It was accomplished through the "Village Profiles and Needs Assessment;" the project funded by the Spanish Agency for International Cooperation for Development (AECID). The "Village Profiles and Needs Assessment" was designed to study, investigate, analyze and document the socio-economic conditions and the needed programs and activities to mitigate the impact of the current unsecure political, economic and social conditions in the Jerusalem Governorate. The project's objectives are to survey, analyze, and document the available natural, human, socioeconomic and environmental resources, and the existing limitations and needs assessment for the development of the rural and marginalized areas in the Jerusalem Governorate.
    [Show full text]
  • Return of Private Foundation
    l efile GRAPHIC p rint - DO NOT PROCESS As Filed Data - DLN: 93491015004014 Return of Private Foundation OMB No 1545-0052 Form 990 -PF or Section 4947( a)(1) Nonexempt Charitable Trust Treated as a Private Foundation Department of the Treasury 2012 Note . The foundation may be able to use a copy of this return to satisfy state reporting requirements Internal Revenue Service • . For calendar year 2012 , or tax year beginning 06 - 01-2012 , and ending 05-31-2013 Name of foundation A Employer identification number CENTURY 21 ASSOCIATES FOUNDATION INC 22-2412138 O/o RAYMOND GINDI ieiepnone number (see instructions) Number and street (or P 0 box number if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite U 22 CORTLANDT STREET Suite City or town, state, and ZIP code C If exemption application is pending, check here F NEW YORK, NY 10007 G Check all that apply r'Initial return r'Initial return of a former public charity D 1. Foreign organizations, check here (- r-Final return r'Amended return 2. Foreign organizations meeting the 85% test, r Address change r'Name change check here and attach computation H Check type of organization FSection 501(c)(3) exempt private foundation r'Section 4947(a)(1) nonexempt charitable trust r'Other taxable private foundation J Accounting method F Cash F Accrual E If private foundation status was terminated I Fair market value of all assets at end und er section 507 ( b )( 1 )( A ), c hec k here F of y e a r (from Part 77, col. (c), Other (specify) _ F If the foundation is in a 60-month termination line 16)x$ 4,783,143
    [Show full text]
  • The Palestinian Economy in East Jerusalem, Some Pertinent Aspects of Social Conditions Are Reviewed Below
    UNITED N A TIONS CONFERENC E ON T RADE A ND D EVELOPMENT Enduring annexation, isolation and disintegration UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT Enduring annexation, isolation and disintegration New York and Geneva, 2013 Notes The designations employed and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of authorities or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. ______________________________________________________________________________ Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. Mention of such a symbol indicates a reference to a United Nations document. ______________________________________________________________________________ Material in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted, but acknowledgement is requested, together with a copy of the publication containing the quotation or reprint to be sent to the UNCTAD secretariat: Palais des Nations, CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland. ______________________________________________________________________________ The preparation of this report by the UNCTAD secretariat was led by Mr. Raja Khalidi (Division on Globalization and Development Strategies), with research contributions by the Assistance to the Palestinian People Unit and consultant Mr. Ibrahim Shikaki (Al-Quds University, Jerusalem), and statistical advice by Mr. Mustafa Khawaja (Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics, Ramallah). ______________________________________________________________________________ Cover photo: Copyright 2007, Gugganij. Creative Commons, http://commons.wikimedia.org (accessed 11 March 2013). (Photo taken from the roof terrace of the Austrian Hospice of the Holy Family on Al-Wad Street in the Old City of Jerusalem, looking towards the south. In the foreground is the silver dome of the Armenian Catholic church “Our Lady of the Spasm”.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerusalem: City of Dreams, City of Sorrows
    1 JERUSALEM: CITY OF DREAMS, CITY OF SORROWS More than ever before, urban historians tell us that global cities tend to look very much alike. For U.S. students. the“ look alike” perspective makes it more difficult to empathize with and to understand cultures and societies other than their own. The admittedly superficial similarities of global cities with U.S. ones leads to misunderstandings and confusion. The multiplicity of cybercafés, high-rise buildings, bars and discothèques, international hotels, restaurants, and boutique retailers in shopping malls and multiplex cinemas gives these global cities the appearances of familiarity. The ubiquity of schools, university campuses, signs, streetlights, and urban transportation systems can only add to an outsider’s “cultural and social blindness.” Prevailing U.S. learning goals that underscore American values of individualism, self-confidence, and material comfort are, more often than not, obstacles for any quick study or understanding of world cultures and societies by visiting U.S. student and faculty.1 Therefore, international educators need to look for and find ways in which their students are able to look beyond the veneer of the modern global city through careful program planning and learning strategies that seek to affect the students in their “reading and learning” about these fertile centers of liberal learning. As the students become acquainted with the streets, neighborhoods, and urban centers of their global city, their understanding of its ways and habits is embellished and enriched by the walls, neighborhoods, institutions, and archaeological sites that might otherwise cause them their “cultural and social blindness.” Jerusalem is more than an intriguing global historical city.
    [Show full text]
  • An Examination of Israeli Municipal Policy in East Jerusalem Ardi Imseis
    American University International Law Review Volume 15 | Issue 5 Article 2 2000 Facts on the Ground: An Examination of Israeli Municipal Policy in East Jerusalem Ardi Imseis Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/auilr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Imseis, Ardi. "Facts on the Ground: An Examination of Israeli Municipal Policy in East Jerusalem." American University International Law Review 15, no. 5 (2000): 1039-1069. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FACTS ON THE GROUND: AN EXAMINATION OF ISRAELI MUNICIPAL POLICY IN EAST JERUSALEM ARDI IMSEIS* INTRODUCTION ............................................. 1040 I. BACKGROUND ........................................... 1043 A. ISRAELI LAW, INTERNATIONAL LAW AND EAST JERUSALEM SINCE 1967 ................................. 1043 B. ISRAELI MUNICIPAL POLICY IN EAST JERUSALEM ......... 1047 II. FACTS ON THE GROUND: ISRAELI MUNICIPAL ACTIVITY IN EAST JERUSALEM ........................ 1049 A. EXPROPRIATION OF PALESTINIAN LAND .................. 1050 B. THE IMPOSITION OF JEWISH SETTLEMENTS ............... 1052 C. ZONING PALESTINIAN LANDS AS "GREEN AREAS".....
    [Show full text]
  • The Springs of Gush Etzion Nature Reserve Nachal
    What are Aqueducts? by the Dagan Hill through a shaft tunnel some 400 meters long. In addition to the two can see parts of the “Arub Aqueduct”, the ancient monastery of Dir al Banat (Daughters’ settlement was destroyed during the Bar Kochba revolt. The large winepress tells of around. The spring was renovated in memory of Yitzhak Weinstock, a resident of WATER OF GUSH ETZION From the very beginning, Jerusalem’s existence hinged on its ability to provide water aqueducts coming from the south, Solomon’s pools received rainwater that had been Monastery) located near the altered streambed, and reach the ancient dam at the foot THE SPRINGS OF GUSH ETZION settlement here during Byzantine times. After visiting Hirbat Hillel, continue on the path Alon Shvut, murdered on the eve of his induction into the IDF in 1993. After visiting from which you \turned right, and a few meters later turn right again, leading to the Ein Sejma, descend to the path below and turn left until reaching Dubak’s pool. Built A hike along the aqueducts in the "Pirim" (Shafts) for its residents. Indeed, during the Middle Canaanite period (17th century BCE), when gathered in the nearby valley as well as the water from four springs running at the sides of the British dam. On top of the British dam is a road climbing from the valley eastwards Start: Bat Ayin Israel Trail maps: Map #9 perimeter road around the community of Bat Ayin. Some 200 meters ahead is the Ein in memory of Dov (Dubak) Weinstock (Yitzhak’s father) Dubak was one of the first Jerusalem first became a city, its rulers had to contend with this problem.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Modern Sacred Geography: Jerusalem's Holy Basin
    Electronic Working Papers Series www.conflictincities.org/workingpapers.html Divided Cities/Contested States Working Paper No. 19 The Development of Modern Sacred Geography: Jerusalem’s Holy Basin Wendy Pullan and Maximilian Gwiazda Department of Architecture University of Cambridge Conflict in Cities and the Contested State: Everyday life and the possibilities for transformation in Belfast, Jerusalem and other divided cities UK Economic and Social Research Council Large Grants Scheme, RES-060-25-0015, 2007-2012. Divided Cities/Contested States Working Paper Series www.conflictincities.org/workingpapers.html Editor: Prof James Anderson Associate Editors: Prof Mick Dumper, Prof Liam O'Dowd and Dr Wendy Pullan Editorial Assistant: Dr Milena Komarova Correspondence to: [email protected]; [email protected] [Comments on published Papers and the Project in general are welcomed at: [email protected] ] THE SERIES 1. From Empires to Ethno-national Conflicts: A Framework for Studying ‘Divided Cities’ in ‘Contested States’ – Part 1, J. Anderson, 2008. 2. The Politics of Heritage and the Limitations of International Agency in Divided Cities: The role of UNESCO in Jerusalem’s Old City, M. Dumper and C. Larkin, 2008. 3. Shared space in Belfast and the Limits of A Shared Future, M. Komarova, 2008. 4. The Multiple Borders of Jerusalem: Implications for the Future of the City, M. Dumper, 2008. 5. New Spaces and Old in ‘Post-Conflict’ Belfast, B. Murtagh, 2008. 6. Jerusalem’s City of David’: The Politicisation of Urban Heritage, W. Pullan and M. Gwiazda, 2008. 7. Post-conflict Reconstruction in Mostar: Cart Before the Horse, Jon Calame and Amir Pasic, 2009.
    [Show full text]